Next Article in Journal
Functional Analysis of Amino Acid Transporter Genes ACYPI000536 and ACYPI004320 in Acyrthosiphon pisum
Previous Article in Journal
DNA Barcoding Unveils New Species of the Sexually Dimorphic Genus Anteon Jurine (Hymenoptera, Dryinidae) from China
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 15
Issue 1
10.3390/insects15010019
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparison of Predatory Performance among Three Ladybird Species, Harmonia axyridis, Coccinella septempunctata and Hippodamia variegata, Feeding on Goji Berry Psyllid, Bactericera gobica

by
Pengxiang Wu
1,
Jia He
2,
Yang Ge
3,
Zhanghui Liu
4 and
Runzhi Zhang
1,5,*
1
Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
2
Institute of Plant Protection, Academy of Ningxia Agriculture and Forestry Science, Yinchuan 750002, China
3
State Key Laboratory for Quality Ensurance and Sustainable Use of Dao-di Herbs, National Resource Center for Chinese Materia Medica, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China
4
MOA Key Lab of Pest Monitoring and Green Management, Department of Entomology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
5
College of Life Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2024, 15(1), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15010019
Submission received: 3 December 2023 / Revised: 22 December 2023 / Accepted: 29 December 2023 / Published: 31 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Pest and Vector Management)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The goji berry, Lycium barbarum L., is a prominent indigenous medicinal plant in Northern China. The high nutrient content of fruits may make goji berry plants susceptible to pests. The goji berry psyllid Bactericera gobica is an extensively prevalent and devastating pest. The current primary approaches employed for goji berry psyllid prevention involve the utilization of chemical pesticides, which may potentially pose risks to human health and the environment. The advantage of biological control, in contrast to alternative methods, lies in its provision of a cost-effective and sustainable control system with minimal adverse effects. By comparing the predatory performance of three ladybird species preying on psyllids, our study suggests that each species possesses distinct advantages as potential predators of psyllids. Further field studies are necessary to determine the most promising ladybird species for rapid impact through inundative biological control, considering the specific environmental adaptability of each ladybird species. This study is expected to provide evidence supporting the potential of promising ladybird species as an effective biological control agent against goji berry psyllids.

Abstract

The psyllid Bactericera gobica is a serious pest in goji berry orchards. The current primary psyllid control methods involve chemical pesticides, which pose potential risks to human health and the environment. The implementation and promotion of biological control agents should receive increased attention as an alternative approach to safeguarding goji berry orchards. To compare the predatory performance of three potential biocontrol agents of psyllids, including Harmonia axyridis, Coccinella septempunctata and Hippodamia variegata, the functional response and intraspecific interactions of adult ladybirds were studied under laboratory conditions. We observed a significantly higher searching efficiency (0.84 ± 0.09) in H. axyridis when preying on psyllids compared to H. variegata (0.55 ± 0.05), whereas the handling time for psyllids was considerably longer in H. axyridis (7.33 ± 0.83 min) than in H. variegata (5.67 ± 0.97 min). The impact of intraspecific interactions on H. variegata (0.44 ± 0.04) was significantly greater than that on C. septempunctata (0.29 ± 0.03), whereas the maximum consumption by C. septempunctata (223.35 ± 41.3) significantly exceeded that of H. variegata (133.4 ± 26.9). Our study suggests that each of these three ladybird species possesses distinct advantages as a potential predator of psyllids. However, further field studies are required to determine the most promising ladybird species for rapid impact through inundative biological control, taking into consideration the specific environmental adaptability of each ladybird species. The present study is expected to provide evidence that supports the potential of incorporating promising ladybird species as an effective biological control agent in goji berry orchard management programs.

1. Introduction

The goji berry, Lycium barbarum L. (Solanaceae: Lycium Linn.), is a prominent medicinal plant indigenous to China [1]. The efficacy of goji berries has been extensively investigated and substantiated in terms of their ability to augment energy levels, enhance sleep quality, and confer a diverse array of additional health benefits [2,3]. The high nutrient content of fruits may render goji berry plants vulnerable to pests. The vegetative growth of goji berry is nearly equivalent to its reproductive growth [4]. Deterring pests in goji berry cultivation presents a significant challenge due to the prolonged young fruit period and relatively short periods of fruit expansion and maturity [5]. The reckless employment of chemical control measures not only seldom attains the desired level of efficacy, but also readily engenders significant concerns such as pesticide residue and environmental contamination [6,7,8]. The decline in both the quantity and quality of goji berries can be partially attributed to the frequent occurrence of pests, which is likely influenced by recent climatic factors. The recent frequent observations of the psyllid Bactericera gobica Loginova (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), previously known as Paratrioza sinica Yang et Li, have been noted in goji berry orchards [9].
The psyllid B. gobica is an extensively prevalent and devastating pest infesting goji berries across the northern regions of China, which are major producers of this fruit [10]. The adult psyllids exhibit remarkable jumping abilities and demonstrate strong behavioral tendencies, displaying significant preferences for oviposition and feeding on fresh foliage [11]. The first instar nymphs exhibit heightened levels of activity, whereas nymphs from the second instar onwards tend to settle on leaves and engage in sap-sucking behavior, leading to aberrant leaf development and premature defoliation, and the honeydew secreted by nymphs frequently serves as a catalyst for the occurrence of sooty mold outbreaks [12]. The goji berry psyllid is characterized by its high fecundity, overlapping generations, and exceptional ability to develop resistance against pesticides. It completes four generations annually and overwinters as an adult in the goji berry region of northern China [13].
The primary methods currently employed for goji berry psyllid prevention involve the utilization of chemical pesticides, which may pose potential risks to human health and the environment [14,15]. The excessive utilization of chemicals not only results in the elimination of natural enemies, but also causes the emergence of pesticide-resistant pests, thereby facilitating the resurgence of pest populations [16]. Therefore, greater emphasis should be placed on the promotion of biocontrol agents as a viable alternative for protecting goji berry orchards. The utilization of natural enemies in biological control provides an ecologically sustainable and highly efficient approach to pest management, effectively reducing or mitigating the impact of pests [9]. The advantage of biological control, as opposed to other methods, lies in its provision of a cost-effective and sustainable control system with minimal adverse effects. Bio-control is both safe and environmentally friendly, while also possessing self-dispersing properties [17]. The foraging behavior of ladybird species Harmonia axyridis Pallas, Coccinella septempunctata Linnaeus, and Hippodamia Variegata Goeze (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) preying on psyllids is frequently observed in goji berry orchards. However, their potential for use as a biocontrol against psyllids, with the most promising ladybird species being used for rapid impact using an inundative biological control, is still unclear. We expect this study to provide evidence supporting the potential of incorporating promising ladybird species as an efficacious biological control agent in goji berry orchard management programs. In this study, we conducted a comparative analysis of their predatory performance, including (1) the functional response and (2) intraspecific interactions of three species of ladybirds preying on psyllids.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Insect Rearing

The colony of goji berry psyllid B. gobica was established using individuals collected from the greenhouse at the Institute of Plant Protection, Ningxia Academy of Agro-Forestry Sciences. The psyllids were reared under controlled conditions at 25 ± 2 °C, 65% ± 5% RH and 16:8 h L:D, using goji berry seedlings as their host plants. Our previous investigations indicated that adult ladybirds of three species exhibit a higher predation rate on psyllids compared to other developmental stages [18,19,20], so this study primarily focused on conducting an analysis of adult ladybirds. Adult individuals of three ladybird species, H. axyridis, C. septempunctata and H. variegata, were obtained from the experimental farm of Institute of Plant Protection, Academy of Ningxia Agriculture and Forestry Science, Ningxia, China. The ladybirds were raised alongside fresh psyllids under the same climatic conditions as previously described. Neonates of ladybirds were immediately separated upon hatching to mitigate the occurrence of sibling cannibalism. Plastic containers (16 cm × 22 cm × 8 cm) housed an average of 20 ladybirds belonging to the same species. Adult ladybirds that had recently emerged (<12 h) were selected and subjected to a 24 h period of starvation prior to the commencement of the experiments. During the experiments, ladybirds and fresh psyllids (<12 h) were introduced into Petri dishes (9 cm in diameter) maintained under the aforementioned climatic conditions.

2.2. Functional Response

To investigate the functional responses of ladybirds to psyllids, we conducted an experiment involving adult ladybirds from three species (H. axyridis, C. septempunctata and H. variegata), five levels of initial psyllid density (100, 150, 200, 250, and 300 individuals), and four developmental stages of psyllids (eggs, 1st–2nd instar nymphs, 3rd–5th instar nymphs, and adults). The treatments were set up by placing the appropriate number of psyllids on a moistened paper disc in a petri dish, followed by the introduction of a single adult ladybird to the same petri dish. The number of psyllids consumed was examined using a binocular microscope 24 h after introducing the ladybird to the petri dish. The evaluation of two parameters, searching efficiency and handling time, was conducted through the process of equation fitting. Control treatments without the introduction of ladybirds were implemented to account for the inherent mortality of psyllids, thereby adjusting for ladybird consumption of psyllids by eliminating the natural mortality of psyllids. The treatments were replicated 6 times each, with the ladybirds used at a 1:1 male-to-female ratio.

2.3. Intraspecific Interactions

The effects of intraspecific interactions on ladybird consumption of psyllids were evaluated by utilizing adult ladybirds from three species (H. axyridis, C. septempunctata and H. variegata) and four developmental stages of psyllids (eggs, 1st–2nd instar nymphs, 3rd–5th instar nymphs, and adults). In a Petri dish, 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 ladybirds were provided with 100, 200, 300, 400 or 500 psyllids at the same developmental stage, respectively, maintaining a prey-to-predator ratio of 100. Intraspecific interactions among ladybirds for space escalated as the abundance of both ladybirds and psyllids increased in a Petri dish. Parameters of intraspecific interactions and maximum consumption per capita were determined by quantifying the number of psyllids consumed within a 24 h period. Each treatment was replicated 6 times (male: female = 1:1).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

2.4.1. Functional Response

The functional responses of ladybirds to psyllids were assessed through a two-stage analysis [21]. The first step involved conducting a cubic logistic regression analysis to determine the shape (type II or type III) of functional responses by examining the proportion of prey consumed (Na/N0) as a function of initial density (Equation (1)) [22,23]:
N a N 0 = exp ( P 0 + P 1 N 0 + P 2 N 0 2 + P 3 N 0 3 ) 1 + exp ( P 0 + P 1 N 0 + P 2 N 0 2 + P 3 N 0 3 )
where Na is the number of psyllids consumed; N0 is the number of psyllids provided. P0, P1, P2 and P3 are intercept, linear, quadratic and cubic parameters, respectively. The type of functional response was determined by the direction (positive or negative) of the linear (P1) and quadratic (P2) parameters obtained from regression analysis. A type I response is characterized by a linear parameter with P1 = 0, whereas a type II response exhibits a negative value for P1, and, finally, a type III response demonstrates a positive value for P1 along with a negative quadratic parameter (P2) [24,25]. If the estimates of the linear parameter in the original model did not exhibit statistical significance, we iteratively simplified the model by excluding the cubic term until significant parameters were achieved [26]. The glm function was employed for logistic regression analysis to estimate the values of P0, P1, P2 and P3 [27].
The second step of the analysis involved employing Holling’s disc equation (Equation (2)) due to the consistent observation of a type II response. This equation was utilized for parameter estimation when quantifying the relationship between psyllid consumption (Na) and initial psyllid abundance (N0):
N a = a T N 0 1 + a T h N 0
where T is the total time, which, in this case, is 24 h, a is the searching efficiency (the area searched per unit time) of ladybird, and Th is the handling time required to process one psyllid [28]. Parameters a and Th are frequently utilized to estimate disparities in functional response, with both being estimated via non-linear least squares regression using the nls function [29]. The Shapiro–Wilk test was employed to evaluate the assumption of normality, while Levene’s test was utilized to assess the assumption of homogeneity of variances across different developmental stages of psyllids.
The distribution of both a and Th was analyzed following appropriate transformation. The parameters exhibited a positive correlation in all treatments (Pearson’s correlation coefficient r = 0.796, p < 0.0001, after reciprocal transformation for Th, Figure S1), within each ladybird species (r = 0.869 for H. axyridis, r = 0.765 for C. septempunctata, r = 0.855 for H. variegata). The differences between ladybird species were investigated for each parameter using ANCOVA, with the other trait as an independent variable and ladybird species as a factor. Prior to analysis, the response variable was transformed using Box–Cox transformation and one outlier was excluded. When the response variable was the searching efficiency (a), a significant interaction between handling time (Th) and ladybird species was observed (p of species * Th = 0.037, Table S1). The subsequent approach involved the adoption of the same methodology for conducting pairwise comparisons among different species of ladybirds (Table S2). The same protocol was employed with a reversed order of variables: when the response variable was the handling time (Th), a significant interaction between searching efficiency (a) and ladybird species was also observed (p of species * a = 0.038, Table S3). Relevant comparisons were subsequently conducted among pairs of ladybird species (Table S4).

2.4.2. Intraspecific Interactions

The experiment was conducted to evaluate the impact of intraspecific interactions on ladybirds during predation events. The parameter of intraspecific interactions was estimated through a nonlinear regression analysis (Equation (3); [30]):
y = qe−mx
where y = ladybird consumption per capita, ex = initial psyllid abundance, m = parameter of intraspecific interactions, q = maximum consumption per capita. The model was established to conduct regression analysis on a power function curve.
Similar to the analysis conducted for functional response, the distribution of both parameters q and m was analyzed following appropriate transformation. The parameters of all species treatments exhibited a positive correlation, both within each species treatment (r = 0.820 for H. axyridis, r = 0.939 for C. septempunctata, r = 0.764 for H. variegata; Figure S2) and across all treatments (Pearson’s correlation coefficient r = 0.815, p < 0.0001, after log-transformation for m and reciprocal transformation for q). Differences between species for each trait of q and m were examined using ANCOVA, with the other trait as the independent variable and ladybird species as a factor. Prior to analysis, the response variable was transformed using Box–Cox transformation and six outliers were removed. When the maximum consumption (q) was considered as the response variable, a significant correlation was observed between the intraspecific interaction parameter (m) and ladybird species (p of species * m = 0.015, Table S5). The subsequent step entailed pairwise comparisons among ladybird species, employing an identical methodology (Table S6). When considering the intraspecific interaction parameter (m) as the response variable, the correlation between the maximum consumption (q) and ladybird species remained significant (p of species * q = 0.048, Table S7). The next step involved conducting additional comparisons among various pairs of ladybird species (Table S8).
Descriptive statistics were presented as the mean values, accompanied by their corresponding standard errors of the mean. Disparities between the natural mortality rate and zero were evaluated through a one-sample t-test, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. The mean consumption of three ladybird species was assessed for normal distribution and homoscedasticity, followed by analysis using one-way ANOVA with the Tukey HSD test to determine statistical significance at the 5% level. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS 20.0 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Functional Response

The natural mortality rates of psyllids were not statistically significant (t119 = 1.952, p = 0.064), as their limited mortality during the experiments rendered the observed rates inconsequential throughout the experimental trials. The parameter estimates were obtained from the logistic model (Equation (1)) for the proportion of psyllids consumed by ladybirds within a 24 h period, in relation to psyllid density (Table S9). Negative linear parameter P1 values indicated that the psyllid consumption by all three ladybird species adhered to the type II functional response (Equation (2)). The mean psyllid consumption by H. axyridis (86.2 ± 4.3) and C. septempunctata (84.2 ± 4.4) exceeded that of H. variegata (72.8 ± 3) (F2, 357 = 3.389, p = 0.035). From the perspective of prey consumption, the highest mean number was observed for the 1st–2nd instar nymphs of psyllids (127.7 ± 4.1), followed by the 3rd–5th instar nymphs (94.9 ± 3.0), adults (68.5 ± 1.4), and eggs (33.2 ± 1.4) (F3, 356 = 212.332, p < 0.001).
The psyllid consumption by ladybirds increased proportionally with the number of psyllids supplied for all three ladybird species, reaching a plateau after a certain threshold was reached (Figure 1). Functional response data for psyllid consumption by ladybirds over a 24 h period exhibited a strong fit to Holling’s disc model (p < 0.05 for each test), thereby confirming a type II response across all treatments. The searching efficiency (a) of H. axyridis (0.84 ± 0.09) feeding on psyllids was markedly higher than that of H. variegata (0.55 ± 0.05), while the searching efficiency of both species did not differ from that of C. septempunctata (0.76 ± 0.10) (Figure 1, Tables S2 and S10). However, the handling time for psyllids (Th) in H. axyridis (7.33 ± 0.83 min) was much longer compared to H. variegata (5.67 ± 0.97 min), while there was little difference in handling time between C. septempunctata (6.42 ± 1.00 min) and the two species (Figure 1, Tables S4 and S10).

3.2. Intraspecific Interactions

When maintaining a constant psyllid-to-ladybird ratio of 100 in the introduction, the total consumption of psyllids by ladybirds in a Petri dish increased proportionally with the number of introduced ladybirds and psyllids. However, the consumption per ladybird declined as both ladybird and psyllid abundance increased (Figure 2), possibly due to the intraspecific interactions resulting from limited spatial availability. The per capita consumption by H. variegata (33.6 ± 1.7) under intraspecific interactions was significantly lower compared to that of H. axyridis (40.4 ± 1.9) and C. septempunctata (40.5 ± 1.9) (F2, 357 = 4.763, p = 0.009). The per capita ladybird consumption of the 1st–2nd instar psyllid nymphs (56.3 ± 1.8) exhibited the highest value among the developmental stages of psyllids, followed by the 3rd–5th instar nymphs (43.1 ± 1.6), adults (38.5 ± 1.4), and eggs (14.7 ± 0.6) (F3, 356 = 148.819, p < 0.001).
The intraspecific interaction equation (Equation (3)) fit all the data remarkably well (p < 0.05 for each test). The maximum consumption (q) exhibited by C. septempunctata (223.35 ± 41.3) significantly surpassed that of H. variegata (133.4 ± 26.9), whereas the maximum consumption demonstrated by both species did not differ from that of H. axyridis (165.4 ± 37.6) (Figure 2, Tables S6 and S11). The impact of intraspecific interactions (m) on H. variegata (0.44 ± 0.04) was significantly greater compared to C. septempunctata (0.29 ± 0.03), while the impact on both species did not differ from that observed in H. axyridis (0.33 ± 0.03) (Figure 2, Tables S8 and S11).

4. Discussion

This study presents a comparative analysis of functional responses to B. gobica among H. axyridis, C. septempunctata and H. variegata. The evidence from our laboratory studies demonstrates the potential of ladybirds in suppressing goji berry psyllids. In the study of functional response, the consumption by three adult ladybirds exhibited a curvilinear increase with the abundance of psyllids offered, followed by a saturation point. The disc model proposed by Holling provides a suitable framework for elucidating the consumption patterns of various psyllid species by ladybirds [31,32]. The mean consumption of H. axyridis and C. septempunctata was significantly higher compared to that of H. variegata. The variation in predation capabilities may be attributed to size differences between the predator and its prey. Moreover, the nutritional content of prey has also been acknowledged to impact ladybird consumption [33,34,35]. The selection of prey by predators is driven by the optimization of their intake of essential amino acids [36]. Prey with a higher nitrogen and protein content is typically regarded as a superior dietary choice for predatory ladybirds [37]. Young psyllids may better fulfill the nutritional requirements and intrinsic demands of ladybirds in comparison to mature psyllids. Additionally, the analysis of cuticle thickness and chitin content revealed that adult psyllids possess a more robust and thicker exoskeleton in comparison to nymphs [38,39]. The preference of predators often lies with prey that possess more pliable bodies, as they are more readily digestible and require less energy expenditure during predation [40,41]. The ladybird consumption of psyllid eggs was observed to be the lowest, possibly attributed to the presence of an egg stalk that functions as a protective mechanism against predation by ladybirds [42].
The size of predators also plays a crucial role in shaping their foraging traits, encompassing search efficiency and handling time [43]. The superior efficiency of H. axyridis in psyllid search can potentially be attributed to its invasive nature, which confers greater adaptability and enhanced flexibility [44]. The direction and angle of prey are typically perceived with exceptional acuity by predators, facilitating their target localization [45,46]. The rapid prey location recognition based on reference objects in its surroundings is more pronounced in H. axyridis compared to H. variegata [47]. Flight is the predominant mode of locomotion for H. axyridis during foraging, while crawling is the primary means of movement for H. variegata [48]. Therefore, the high mobility of H. axyridis is likely to enhance its detectability, potentially augmenting its efficacy in psyllid searches. The small-sized H. variegata may choose not to engage in hunting when it encounters prey of similar proportions, such as adult psyllids, resulting in a reduced searching efficiency. The decision of whether to engage in predatory behavior towards encountered prey depends on the potential benefits associated with searching for alternative prey items, as predators typically prioritize those that offer the greatest energy yield [49]. However, the handling time required for H. variegata to process one psyllid is the shortest once the prey is captured, potentially attributed to its exceptional flexibility resulting from its small size. Specifically, the efficiency of H. variegata in handling the stalked eggs of psyllids was notably higher than H. axyridis [42]. Overall, three ladybird species each possess distinct advantageous traits in their predation of goji berry psyllids. The larger ladybird H. axyridis demonstrates a higher efficiency in searching psyllids, whereas the smaller ladybird H. variegata exhibits a shorter handling time.
The investigation into intraspecific interactions revealed a progressive decline in per capita ladybird consumption with increasing ladybird and psyllid abundance. The per capita consumption of ladybirds was negatively impacted by high densities, likely due to the increased likelihood of intraspecific interactions resulting from spatial constraints [50]. The overall consumption sequence remained unchanged in the presence of intraspecific interactions. The intraspecific interaction model for ladybirds has been empirically validated to derive parameters q (maximum consumption) and m (intraspecific interaction parameter) [51,52]. The maximum consumption of C. septempunctata was significantly higher than that of H. variegata under intraspecific interactions, possibly due to the limited digestive capacity of H. variegata and the phenomenon of predator satiation [53,54,55,56]. The activity of ladybirds significantly increases as a result of consuming an adequate number of psyllids; thus, ladybirds belonging to low-satiation species may allocate a greater amount of additional time to intraspecific interactions [57,58]. The stronger intraspecific interactions observed in smaller H. variegata individuals may be attributed to their lower maximum consumption.
This study represents the initial phase in assessing the efficacy of three ladybird species as potential biological control agents against psyllids, focusing on the short-term functional response and intraspecific interaction experiments. The findings suggest that three species of ladybirds each possess unique advantages as potential predators of psyllids. The selection among them may be influenced by the specific ladybird’s environmental adaptability, so it is advisable to choose the dominant ladybird species based on the corresponding environmental conditions. However, the determination of the most promising ladybird species for rapid impact using inundative biological control requires further field studies. Field studies are essential for validating the functional response since the quantitative models developed in controlled laboratory environments seem to have restricted relevance when evaluating foraging capabilities under real-world conditions [59]. This limitation is attributed to variations in predator searching efficiency across diverse environmental contexts [60]. The disparity in outcomes between field and laboratory conditions can be attributed to their spatial complexity, which plays a pivotal role in natural environments and cannot be replicated under simplified laboratory conditions [61]. In fact, the functional responses analyzed in laboratory experiments often reflect the conditions of high pest abundance in the field [62,63]. In addition, the presence of intraspecific interactions can potentially disrupt the quantification of consumption levels, as determined by functional responses. Understanding both psyllid–ladybird and ladybird–ladybird interactions may provide valuable insight into psyllid management, as the existence of intraspecific interactions can potentially disrupt the foraging capacity quantified by functional responses.
During the experiments, we observed an escalation in partially consumed psyllid cadavers as the psyllid abundance escalated, implying that ladybirds demonstrated the capacity to eliminate more psyllids than they could consume due to saturation. The excessive killing and increased consumption indicate the adaptation of predators to environments with abundant food resources and limited food availability, respectively [64,65]. The temperature during the inundative release of ladybirds against psyllids in the field should be considered due to its significant impact on their predatory performance [66]. The consideration of plant characteristics is also valuable for future investigation owing to their impact on the predatory performance of ladybirds [31]. The host plant and its pollen can exert an influence on the palatability and suitability of prey, which may influence the predatory performance [67]. Additionally, considering the prevalence of ladybirds in goji berry orchards and their potential to control psyllids, it is imperative to further investigate the impact of ladybirds on other pests, such as aphids, in the goji berry field. The excessive utilization of chemical pesticides should be minimized, even subsequent to the goji berry fruit harvest, to promote the proliferation of ladybird populations. The implementation of these measures is expected to enhance the sustainability of goji berry production and address safety concerns from a socio-environmental perspective.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects15010019/s1, Figure S1: Relationship between the searching efficiency (a) and the handling time (Th) for three ladybird species; Table S1: Summary for boxcox (a)~ladybird species * Th via ANCOVA; Table S2: P value of factor ladybird species for searching efficiency (a) based on ANCOVA performed on pairs of ladybird species; Table S3: Summary for boxcox (Th)~ladybird species * a via ANCOVA; Table S4: P value of factor ladybird species for handling time (Th) via ANCOVA performed on pairs of ladybird species; Figure S2: Relationship between the maximum consumption (q) and the intraspecific interaction parameter (m) for three ladybird species; Table S5: Summary for boxcox (q)~ladybird species * m via ANCOVA; Table S6: P value of factor ladybird species for maximum consumption (q) based on ANCOVA performed on pairs of ladybird species; Table S7: Summary for boxcox (m)~ladybird species * q via ANCOVA; Table S8: P value of factor ladybird species for intraspecific interaction parameter (m) based on ANCOVA performed on pairs of ladybird species; Table S9: Maximum likelihood estimates (±SE) for parameters of the logistic model fit to the proportion of psyllids consumed versus the initial psyllid abundance; Table S10: Parameters estimated from individual nonlinear regression for functional responses (Mean ± SE); Table S11: Parameters estimated from individual nonlinear regression for intraspecific interactions (Mean ± SE).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.W. and R.Z.; methodology, P.W., Y.G. and Z.L.; investigation, P.W. and J.H.; writing—original draft preparation, P.W.; writing—review and editing, P.W., J.H., Y.G. and R.Z.; supervision, P.W. and R.Z.; funding acquisition, P.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2021YFC2600100) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32102206).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank Siqin Ge for providing the greenhouse. We thank Yanan Wang and Qiaoling Lin for greenhouse management, and Jiaqi Xu for formatting references. All individuals mentioned above are affiliated with the Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vidovi, B.B.; Milini, D.D.; Mareti, M.D.; Djuri, J.D.; Ilic, T.D.; Kosti, A.; Pesic, M.B. Health benefits and applications of goji berries in functional food products development: A review. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Magalhaes, V.; Silva, B.; Zhang, X.Y.; Silva, A.R.; Dias, A.C.P. Comparative studies on the anti-neuroinflammatory and antioxidant activities of black and red goji berries. J. Funct. Foods 2022, 92, 105038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Islam, T.; Yu, X.M.; Badwal, T.S.; Xu, B.J. Comparative studies on phenolic profiles, antioxidant capacities and carotenoid contents of red goji berry (Lycium barbarum) and black goji berry (Lycium ruthenicum). Chem. Cent. J. 2017, 11, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yu, J.; Yan, Y.M.; Zhang, L.T.; Mi, J.; Yu, L.M.; Zhang, F.F.; Lu, L.; Luo, Q.; Li, X.Y.; Zhou, X.; et al. A comprehensive review of goji berry processing and utilization. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 11, 7445–7457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chen, H.Y.; Shen, S.; Zhi, H.; Li, W. Pesticides residues on Goji berry: A characteristic minor crop in China. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2023, 120, 105342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gupta, S.; Gupta, R.; Sharma, S. Impact of chemical- and bio-pesticides on bacterial diversity in rhizosphere of Vigna radiata. Ecotoxicology 2013, 22, 1479–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mohamed, A.K.A.; Pratt, J.A.P.; Nelson, F.R.S. Compatability of Metarhizium Anisopliae Var. Anisopliae with chemical pesticides. Mycopathologia 1987, 99, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wilkinson, J.D.; Biever, K.D.; Ignoffo, C.M. Contact toxicity of some chemical and biological pesticides to several insect parasitoids and predators. Entomophaga 1975, 20, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wu, P.X.; Ma, B.X.; Wu, F.M.; Ouyang, H.Y.; Fan, J.Y.; Xu, J.; Zhang, R.Z. The hyperparasitoid Marietta picta mediates the coexistence of primary parasitoids of goji berry psyllid. Entomol. Gen. 2020, 2, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ge, Y.; Smith, O.M.; Chen, W.; Liu, P.; Yuan, Q.; Kang, C.; Wang, T.; Sun, J.; Yan, B.; Liu, X.; et al. Morphological characterization and sexual dimorphism of the antennal sensilla in Bactericera gobica Loginova (Hemiptera: Psyllidae)—A scanning and transmission electron microscopic study. PeerJ 2022, 10, e12888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, P.X.; Ma, B.X.; Wu, F.M.; Xu, J.; Zhang, R.Z. The endoparasitoid Psyllaephagus arenarius benefits from the ectoparasitic venom via multiparasitism with the ectoparasitoid Tamarixia lyciumi. Insect Sci. 2020, 27, 815–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Cho, G.; Burckhardt, D.; Lee, S. First record from Korea of the jumping plant-louse Bactericera gobica (Loginova) (Hemiptera: Triozidae), a pest on Lycium chinense Mill., with comments on psyllids associated with Lycium (Solanaceae). J. Asia Pac. Entomol. 2016, 19, 995–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wu, P.X.; Ge, Y.; He, J.; Haseeb, M.; Zhang, R.Z. Positive Interactions between Aceria pallida and Bactericera gobica on Goji Berry Plants. Insects 2022, 13, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gupta, S.; Gupta, R.; Sharma, S. Impact of pesticides on plant growth promotion of Vigna radiata and non-target microbes: Comparison between chemical- and bio-pesticides. Ecotoxicology 2014, 23, 1015–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bruce, N.A.; Margie, P.; Lois, S.G. Nature’s chemicals and synthetic chemicals: Comparative toxicology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1990, 87, 7782–7786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Steinmann, K.P.; Minghua, Z.; Grant, J.A. Does Use of Pesticides Known to Harm Natural Enemies of Spider Mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) Result in Increased Number of Miticide Applications? An Examination of California Walnut Orchards. J. Econ. Entomol. 2011, 104, 1496–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Smilanich, A.M.; Dyer, L.A. Effects of Banana Plantation Pesticides on the Immune Response of Lepidopteran Larvae and Their Parasitoid Natural Enemies. Insects 2012, 3, 616–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wu, P.X.; Ouyang, H.Y.; Xu, J.; Zhang, R.; He, J.; Zhang, R.Z. Predation of Poratrioza sinica Yang & Li by the adults of Coccinella septempunctata. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2016, 27, 3712–3718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wu, P.X.; Ouyang, H.Y.; Xu, J.; Zhang, R.; He, J.; Zhang, R.Z. Predation of Paratrioza sinica Yang & Li by adult Hippodamia variegata (Goeze). Chin. J. Appl. Entomol. 2016, 53, 1353–1360. [Google Scholar]
  20. Wu, P.X.; Ma, B.X.; Xu, J.; He, J.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, R.Z. Predation of Poratrioza sinica Yang & Li by Harmonia axyridis adults. Acta Phytophy. Sin. 2017, 44, 582–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Juliano, S.A. Nonlinear curve fitting: Predation and functional response curves. In Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments, 2nd ed.; Scheiner, S.M., Gurevitch, J., Eds.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2001; pp. 178–196. [Google Scholar]
  22. Timms, J.E.; Oliver, T.H.; Straw, N.A.; Leather, S.R. The effects of host plant on the coccinellid functional response: Is the conifer specialist Aphidecta obliterata (L.) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) better adapted to spruce than the generalist Adalia bipunctata (L.) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)? Biol. Control 2008, 47, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xiao, Y.; Fadamiro, H.Y. Functional responses and prey-stage preferences of three species of predacious mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on citrus red mite, Panonychus citri (Acari: Tetranychidae). Biol. Control 2010, 53, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Costa, J.F.; Matos, C.H.; de Oliveira, C.R.; Da Silva, T.G.; Lima Neto, I.F. Functional and numerical responses of Stethorus tridens Gordon (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) preying on Tetranychus bastosi Tuttle, Baker & Sales (Acari: Tetranychidae) on physic nut (Jatropha curcas). Biol. Control 2017, 111, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fathipour, Y.; Karimi, M.; Farazmand, A.; Talebi, A.A. Age-specific functional response and predation rate of Amblyseius swirskii (Phytoseiidae) on two-spotted spider mite. Syst. Appl. Acarol. 2017, 22, 159–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jalali, M.A.; Tirry, L.; De Clercq, P. Effect of temperature on the functional response of Adalia bipunctata to Myzus persicae. BioControl 2010, 55, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. De Clercq, P.; Mohaghegh, J.; Tirry, L. Effect of host plant on the functional response of the predator Podisus nigrispinus (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Biol. Control 2000, 18, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Poole, A.E.; Stillman, R.A.; Watson, H.K.; Norris, K.J. Searching efficiency and the functional response of a pause-travel forage. Funct. Ecol. 2007, 21, 784–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mondal, R.P.; Chandra, G.; Bandyopadhyay, S.; Ghosh, A. Effect of temperature and search area on the functional response of Anisops sardea (Hemiptera: Notonectidae) against Anopheles stephensi in laboratory bioassay. Acta Trop. 2017, 166, 262–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hassell, M.P. A Population model for the interaction between Cyzenis albicans (Fall.) (Tachinidae) and Operophtera brumata (L.) (Geometridae) at Wytham, Berkshire. J. Anim. Ecol. 1969, 38, 567–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sarkar, S.C.; Milroy, S.P.; Xu, W. Development and reproduction of a native generalist predator, Coccinella transversalis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), on the tomato potato psyllid, Bactericera cockerelli, with a greenhouse assay of biocontrol potential. Biol. Control 2022, 176, 105108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Huang, Z.D.; Qureshi, J.; Zhou, X.M.; Pu, Z.X.; Chen, G.Q.; Yu, J.H.; Zhang, H.Y. Predation and functional response of the multi-coloured Asian ladybeetle Harmonia axyridis on the adult Asian citrus psyllid Diaphorina citri. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2019, 29, 293–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mayntz, D.; Raubenheimer, D.; Salomon, M.; Toft, S.; Simpson, S. Nutrient-specific foraging in invertebrate predators. Science 2005, 307, 111–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wilder, S.M.; Holway, D.A.; Suarez, A.V.; Eubanks, M.D. Macronutrient content of plant-based food affects growth of a carnivorous arthropod. Ecology 2011, 92, 325–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Denno, R.F.; Fagan, W.F. Might nitrogen limitation promote omnivory among carnivorous arthropods? Ecology 2003, 84, 2522–2531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Schmidt, J.M.; Sebastian, P.; Wilder, S.M.; Rypstra, A.L. The nutritional content of prey affects the foraging of a generalist arthropod predator. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e49223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jensen, K.; Mayntz, D.; Toft, S.; Clissold, F.J.; Hunt, J.; Raubenheimer, D.; Raubenheimer, D.; Simpson, S.J. Optimal foraging for specific nutrients in predatory beetles. Proc. R. Soc. B 2012, 279, 2212–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Yu, H.Z.; Yi, L.; Lu, Z.J. Silencing of Chitin-Binding Protein with PYPV-Rich Domain Impairs Cuticle and Wing Development in the Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri. Insects 2022, 13, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ammar, E.D.; Hall, D.G.; Shatters, R.G. Ultrastructure and development of the new stylets inside pre-molting first instar nymphs of the asian citrus psyllid Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae). Fla. Entomol. 2015, 98, 373–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tkaczenko, G.K.; Fischer, A.C.; Weterings, R. Prey preference of the Common House Geckos Hemidactylus frenatus and Hemidactylus platyurus. Herpetol Notes 2014, 7, 483–488. [Google Scholar]
  41. Fisher, D.O.; Dickman, C.R. Diets of insectivorous marsupials in arid Australia: Selection for prey type, size or hardness? J. Arid Environ. 1993, 25, 397–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wu, P.X.; Ma, B.X.; Shuo, Y.; Xu, J.; He, J.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, R.Z. Protective effects of the egg stalk of Paratrioza sinica (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) at various angles and spacings against three predaceous coccinellids, Harmonia axyridis, Coccinella septempunctata and Hippodamia variegate (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Pest Manag. Sci. 2018, 74, 356–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Farhoudi, F.; Allahyari, H.; Tabadkani, S.M.; Gholizadeh, M. Prey preference of Aphidoletes aphidimyza on Acyrthosiphon pisum: Effect of Prey Color and Size. J. Insect Behav. 2014, 27, 776–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tayeh, A.; Hufbauer, R.A.; Estoup, A.; Ravigne, V.; Frachon, L.; Facon, B. Biological invasion and biological control select for different life histories. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Klarner, D.; Barth, F.G. Vibratory signals and prey capture in orb-weaving spiders (Zygiella x-notata, Nephila clavipes; Araneidae). J. Comp. Physiol. 1982, 148, 445–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hergenroder, R.; Barth, F.G. Vibratory signals and spider behavior: How do the sensory inputs from the eight legs interact in orientation? J. Comp. Physiol. 1983, 152, 361–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wu, P.X.; He, J.; Dong, H.; Zhang, R.Z. Functional response and intraspecific competition of three ladybird species feeding on aphids on goji berry plants in laboratory and semi-field conditions. Insects 2023, 14, 853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Liu, J.; Zhao, Z.; Yan, Y.; Zhao, Z. Effect of alfalfa habitat change on dispersal behavior of Harmonia axyridis Pallas and Hippodamia variegata Goeze (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). J. Asia Pac. Entomol. 2021, 24, 997–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Macfadyen, S.; Davies, A.P.; Zalucki, M.P. Assessing the impact of arthropod natural enemies on crop pests at the field scale. Insect Sci. 2015, 22, 20–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hattingh, V.; Samways, M.J. Absence of intraspecific interference during feeding by the predatory ladybirds Chilocorus spp. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Ecol. Entomol. 1990, 15, 385–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zaviezo, T.; Soares, A.O.; Grez, A.A. Interspecific exploitative competition between Harmonia axyridis and other coccinellids is stronger than intraspecific competition. Biol. Control 2019, 131, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Howe, A.G.; Ransijn, J.; Ravn, H.P. A sublethal effect on native Anthocoris nemoralis through competitive interactions with invasive Harmonia axyridis. Ecol. Entomol. 2015, 40, 639–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Rondoni, G.; Ielo, F.; Ricci, C.; Conti, E. Intraguild predation responses in two aphidophagous coccinellids identify differences among juvenile stages and aphid densities. Insects 2014, 5, 974–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Katsanis, A.; Babendreier, D.; Nentwig, W.; Kenis, M. Intraguild predation between the invasive ladybird Harmonia axyridis and non-target European coccinellid species. BioControl 2013, 58, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Papanikolaou, N.E.; Milonas, P.G.; Demiris, N.; Papachristos, D.P.; Matsinos, Y.G. Digestion limits the functional response of an aphidophagous coccinellid. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2014, 107, 468–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wu, P.X.; Zhang, J.; Haseeb, M.; Yan, S.; Kanga, L.; Zhang, R.Z. Functional responses and intraspecific competition in the ladybird Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) provided with Melanaphis sacchari (Homoptera: Aphididae) as prey. Eur. J. Entomol. 2018, 115, 232–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Van Gils, J.A.; Piersma, T. Digestively constrained predators evade the cost of interference competition. J. Anim. Ecol. 2004, 73, 386–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Papanikolaou, N.E.; Nikos, D.; Milonas, P.G.; Simon, P.; Theodore, K. Does mutual interference affect the feeding rate of aphidophagous coccinellids? A modeling perspective. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0146168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Michaud, J.P. Numerical response of Olla v-nigrum (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to infestations of Asian citrus psyllid, (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in Florida. Fla. Entomol. 2001, 84, 608–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Michaud, J.P. Biological control of Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in Florida: A preliminary report. Entomol. News 2002, 113, 216–222. [Google Scholar]
  61. O’Neil, R.J. Functional response and search strategy of Podisus maculiventris (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) attacking Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Environ. Entomol. 1997, 26, 1183–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Campos, V.; Araya, J.E. Functional response of Nabis punctipennis Blanchard to Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris in the laboratory. Chil. J. Agric. Anim. Sci. 2017, 33, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sun, G.Q.; Wang, S.L.; Ren, Q.; Jin, Z.; Wu, Y.P. Effects of time delay and space on herbivore dynamics: Linking inducible defenses of plants to herbivore outbreak. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 11246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Maupin, J.; Riechert, S. Superfluous killing in spiders: A consequence of adaptation to food-limited environments? Behav. Ecol. 2001, 12, 569–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Noriyuki, S.; Osawa, N. Intrinsic prey suitability in specialist and generalist Harmonia ladybirds: A test of the trade-off hypothesis for food specialization. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2012, 144, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ge, Y.; Zhang, L.; Qin, Z.; Wang, Y.; Liu, P.; Tan, S.; Fu, Z.; Smith, O.M.; Shi, W.P. Different predation capacities and mechanisms of Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) on two morphotypes of pear psylla Cacopsylla chinensis (Hemiptera: Psyllidae). PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0215834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zheng, X.M.; Tao, Y.L.; Chi, H.; Wan, F.H.; Chu, D. Adaptability of small brown planthopper to four rice cultivars using life table and population projection method. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Insects 15 00019 g001
Figure 1. Functional responses of (A) H. axyridis, (B) C. septempunctata, and (C) H. variegata to B. gobica. Colored points and curves depict the ladybird consumption of psyllids within 24 h after being introduced to different densities of psyllids. The data for each individual were fitted using the Holling type II functional response function with parameters a and Th. The average values of a and Th in each ladybird species were utilized to generate black curves. (D) Schematic representation of psyllid consumption by different ladybird species, with the curves derived from the black curves in (A–C).
Figure 1. Functional responses of (A) H. axyridis, (B) C. septempunctata, and (C) H. variegata to B. gobica. Colored points and curves depict the ladybird consumption of psyllids within 24 h after being introduced to different densities of psyllids. The data for each individual were fitted using the Holling type II functional response function with parameters a and Th. The average values of a and Th in each ladybird species were utilized to generate black curves. (D) Schematic representation of psyllid consumption by different ladybird species, with the curves derived from the black curves in (A–C).
Insects 15 00019 g001
Insects 15 00019 g002
Figure 2. Intraspecific interactions of (A) H. axyridis, (B) C. septempunctata, and (C) H. variegata. The per capita ladybird consumption of psyllids is visually represented through colored points and curves, with a fixed ratio of 100 for different psyllid and ladybird combinations. The data for each test were fitted using the intraspecific interaction function incorporating parameters q and m. The mean values of q and m for each ladybird species were employed to generate black curves. (D) Schematic representation of per capita consumption of psyllids by each ladybird species, with the curves derived from the black curves in (A–C).
Figure 2. Intraspecific interactions of (A) H. axyridis, (B) C. septempunctata, and (C) H. variegata. The per capita ladybird consumption of psyllids is visually represented through colored points and curves, with a fixed ratio of 100 for different psyllid and ladybird combinations. The data for each test were fitted using the intraspecific interaction function incorporating parameters q and m. The mean values of q and m for each ladybird species were employed to generate black curves. (D) Schematic representation of per capita consumption of psyllids by each ladybird species, with the curves derived from the black curves in (A–C).
Insects 15 00019 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, P.; He, J.; Ge, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, R. Comparison of Predatory Performance among Three Ladybird Species, Harmonia axyridis, Coccinella septempunctata and Hippodamia variegata, Feeding on Goji Berry Psyllid, Bactericera gobica. Insects 2024, 15, 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15010019

AMA Style

Wu P, He J, Ge Y, Liu Z, Zhang R. Comparison of Predatory Performance among Three Ladybird Species, Harmonia axyridis, Coccinella septempunctata and Hippodamia variegata, Feeding on Goji Berry Psyllid, Bactericera gobica. Insects. 2024; 15(1):19. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15010019

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Pengxiang, Jia He, Yang Ge, Zhanghui Liu, and Runzhi Zhang. 2024. "Comparison of Predatory Performance among Three Ladybird Species, Harmonia axyridis, Coccinella septempunctata and Hippodamia variegata, Feeding on Goji Berry Psyllid, Bactericera gobica" Insects 15, no. 1: 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15010019

APA Style

Wu, P., He, J., Ge, Y., Liu, Z., & Zhang, R. (2024). Comparison of Predatory Performance among Three Ladybird Species, Harmonia axyridis, Coccinella septempunctata and Hippodamia variegata, Feeding on Goji Berry Psyllid, Bactericera gobica. Insects, 15(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15010019

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop