Next Article in Journal
Radio Telemetry and Harmonic Radar Tracking of the Spotted Lanternfly, Lycorma delicatula (White) (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae)
Previous Article in Journal
Habitat Characteristics, Distribution, and Abundance of Cicindelidia haemorrhagica (LeConte) (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) in Yellowstone National Park
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 15
Issue 1
10.3390/insects15010016
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Mutagenesis of Antennapedia in Spodoptera frugiperda

by
Congke Wang
1,2,3,†,
Te Zhao
1,2,3,*,†,
Xiaolong Liu
1,2,3,
Tianliang Li
1,2,3,
Leiming He
1,2,3,
Qinqin Wang
1,2,3,
Li Wang
1,2,3 and
Lin Zhou
1,2,3,*
1
College of Plant Protection, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China
2
Key Laboratory of New Pesticide Development and Application, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China
3
Green Pesticide Creation Engineering Technology Research Center, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Insects 2024, 15(1), 16; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15010016
Submission received: 15 November 2023 / Revised: 25 December 2023 / Accepted: 28 December 2023 / Published: 29 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Molecular Biology and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Spodoptera frugiperda, a significant pest affecting various crops, has been the focus of study to understand the role of Antennapedia (Antp), essential for insect thorax and wing development. We investigated Antp in S. frugiperda using RT-qPCR and CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing. We found that Antp is highly similar across Lepidoptera and is expressed throughout the life cycle of S. frugiperda, with the highest expression in the egg stage and significant expression between 12 to 48 h. The gene was primarily active in the thorax and legs. By knocking out Antp by CRISPR/Cas9, we observed abnormal development of the thoracic legs of the larvae and abnormal pupation. After the expression of Antp decreased, the expression of other Hox genes, appendage development genes and cuticular protein genes decreased significantly.

Abstract

The homeotic gene Antennapedia (Antp) has been identified as playing a pivotal role in the morphogenesis of the thorax and wings across various insect species. Leveraging insights from previous studies, the functional characterization of Antp in S. frugiperda was undertaken using RT-qPCR and the CRISPR/Cas9 genome-editing system. Phylogenetic analyses indicate that Antp shares a high degree of sequence homology among Lepidoptera species. The expression profile of SfAntp was detected by RT-qPCR. The results showed that SfAntp was expressed in the whole growth cycle of S. frugiperda, the expression level was the highest in the egg stage, and the expression level was higher from 12 h to 48 h. Tissue-specific expression profiling demonstrated that SfAntp was most abundantly expressed in the thoracic segments and legs. To functionally disrupt SfAntp, two sgRNA sites were designed at the first exon of SfAntp and the gene was knocked out by CRISPR/Cas9 via microinjection. The results showed that the deletion of SfAntp produced a mutant phenotype of thoracic fusion, thoracic leg defect, leg-like protrusions between the head and thoracic segments and pupation deformity. In addition, deletion of SfAntp resulted in high embryo mortality. Through DNA sequencing, it was found that the target site of the SfAntp mutant had different degrees of frameshift mutations, indicating that the mutant phenotype was indeed caused by the knockout of SfAntp.

1. Introduction

Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Mith) belongs to Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, also known as fall armyworm [1]. It is native to tropical and subtropical regions of the Americas and has been marked by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) as a major global migratory pest [2,3]. It has characteristics such as fast migration speed, wide harm range, many host species and strong reproductive ability. S. frugiperda has now spread globally, in Africa, Asia, Europe, Oceania and other regions, and in January 2019, it spread rapidly in China’s Yunnan region and the surrounding provinces [4,5,6]. Now, S. frugiperda is still in a state of continuous outbreak in China [7].
Antp is a member of the Drosophila Antennapedia Complex (ANT-C) and is the earliest discovered Hox gene in Drosophila [8]. In 1915, a class of homologous heteromorphic mutations caused by Antp was found in Drosophila, which led to the phenotypic transformation of cranial antennae into thoracic legs, thus bestowing the designation “Antennapedia” [9]. In Drosophila, Antp expression commences during the nascent phases of embryonic development, predominantly within the thoracic region [10]. Initial expression unfolds from the posterior labial segment, pervading through the thoracic cavity, and into the first abdominal segment. As embryonic development progresses with concurrent shortening of the embryo, the expression domain becomes confined predominantly to the T1–T3 thoracic segments. This spatial restriction of expression may arise from the negative regulatory influences exerted by the Ultrabithorax (Ubx) [11]. Antp expression is tightly regulated during development, with two promoters (P1 and P2) targeting mid-thoracic tissue, each influenced by specific enhancers active in early embryogenesis, and various mechanisms modulating larval tissue expression [12].
In Drosophila, Antp plays a pivotal role in governing cell fate determination within the head and thoracic regions, somite differentiation, and the morphogenesis of tissues and organs [13]. Mutations in Antp give rise to an array of phenotypic manifestations. Specifically, the loss of Antp function in the embryo culminates in a homeotic transformation, such that the identities of the second and third thoracic segments are converted to that of the first thoracic segment [14]. Moreover, in imaginal discs of adult Drosophila, silencing of Antp induces the metamorphosis of central thoracic appendages into antennal structures [15]. Although the underlying mechanisms for these distinct phenotypic alterations remain enigmatic, they likely reflect the intricately specialized developmental stages of Drosophila embryos and larvae. Antp, together with other Hox proteins, is crucial for the proper development of embryonic musculature and subsequently contributes to the architecture of the adult thoracic musculature [16]. Furthermore, Antp is instrumental in the development of the visual system, nervous system, and midgut, underscoring its significance in the comprehensive development of Drosophila [17,18].
Recently, a novel type of Wedge eye-spot (Wes) mutation has been identified in Bombyx mori. Homozygous larvae display eye patterns with a wedge shape, thoracic fusion, and antennae-like appendages positioned between the head and thorax. The occurrence of these phenotypes can potentially be attributed to the loss of Antp functionality [19]. Antp is not necessary for wing development in Drosophila, and the silencing or overexpression of this gene will not affect the morphology of Drosophila wings [20]. However, in the Wes mutant of B. mori, both the fore and hind wings exhibit smaller or deformed structures, and the expression levels of Antp in these mutant wings are significantly higher compared to normal wings. These observations suggest that the role of Antp may differ across various insect species.
Previous investigations on Tribolium castaneum have revealed that mutations in ptl, an Antp homolog, can induce the transformation of three pairs of thoracic legs into antennae [21]. Similarly, disrupting Antp in the spider Achaearanea tepidariorum leads to the production of supernumerary legs in the thoracic region [22]. Notably, Dll represents a pivotal gene involved in leg development in both fruit flies and spiders [23,24]. In Tetranychus urticae, Scr, Ftz, and Antp exhibit significant upregulation during the first molt stage. RNA interference results in the curling of L3 and loss of L4, while these three genes also collaborate in maintaining leg development in T. urticae alongside Dll [25]. However, after interfering with Antp in spiders, the expression of Dll at the leg growth site does not show downregulation. This discrepancy may arise from the interaction of Antp with different cooperative factors and target genes during the course of species evolution [22].
Hox genes play a crucial role in the development and evolution of insect appendages [26]. Each Hox gene regulates the expression of a multitude of target genes and plays a pivotal role in the formation of the insect’s body axis, nervous system, and organs [27]. Antp is related to the development of insect thoracic segments and the formation of thoracic legs and plays a key role in the embryonic development of insects [28,29,30]. In view of its importance, this study carried out bioinformatics analysis, spatiotemporal expression pattern analysis and CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis of the S. frugiperda Antp (SfAntp) gene. The purpose is to obtain the somatic development mutants of different parts from the mutation of this Hox gene in S. frugiperda, and to explore its role in the development of appendages of S. frugiperda, so as to lay a theoretical basis for the population genetic control of S. frugiperda.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Insects

S. frugiperda used in this experiment were purchased from Henan Jiyuan Baiyun Industrial Co., Ltd (Jiyuan, China). They were reared in an artificial climate chamber (temperature 28 ± 1 °C, photoperiod L:D = 14:10, relative humidity 75%). The larvae were fed with fresh corn leaves planted in the laboratory, and the adults were fed with 10% sucrose solution for nutrition.

2.2. Phylogenetic Tree

We selected 28 Antp sequences on NCBI to align with SfAntp and establish a phylogenetic tree. Sequence alignment was constructed by using the maximum likelihood method based on CLUSTAL W2. The neighbor-joining method was used to create the tree from 29 available Antp sequences. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Poisson correction method and are displayed as the number of nucleotide substitutions per site.

2.3. Analysis of SfAntp Expression Profile

The analysis of expression profiles at different developmental stages required RNA extraction from samples, including eggs, larvae of stage 1–6, female and male pupae, and female and male adults.
Furthermore, for the expression profile of embryonic development, it was necessary to collect the eggs at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 36 h, 48 h and 60 h after oviposition for RNA extraction.
In addition, the expression profile analysis of different tissues required the extraction of RNA from different tissues of male and female adults, including head, thoracic segments, abdominal segments, external genitalia, legs, antennae, and wings.
RNA was extracted with the Trizol method; cDNA was synthesized by reverse transcription and stored at −80 °C.
The sequence of SfAntp (XM_035584826) was obtained from NCBI, and the primers for RT-qPCR were designed by Primer software (version 5). The specific sequences are shown in Table 1. The primers used for RT-qPCR were first tested for primer amplification efficiency. A series of diluted cDNAs (1×, 10×, 100×, 1000×, 10,000×) were used to construct a standard curve to calculate its correlation coefficient and slope value. The amplification efficiency was calculated with the equation [10(1/−slope) − 1] × 100%. The amplification efficiency needs to be between 90 and 110% before the next experiment can be performed.
RT-qPCR was performed on a 20 μL system. The content of each reaction component was 10 μL of Power UpTM SYBRTM Green Master Mix, 1 μg of cDNA, 1 μL of 10 μM forward and reverse primers each, plus RNase Free ddH2O to 20 μL. The reaction conditions were 50 °C for 2 min, 95 °C for 2 min; 40 × (95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 1 min); 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 1 min to 95 °C in 0.15 °C steps of 1 s for the dissolution curve. GAPDH was used as a reference gene, and three replicates were set for each sample. After the reaction, the collected data were analyzed by using the 2−ΔΔCt method in Excel.

2.4. Phenotypic Changes Caused by SfAntp Mutation

In this study, the first exon of SfAntp was selected as the target, and two SgRNAs were designed on it. The synthesized SfAntp-sgRNA1 (300 ng/μL), SfAntp-sgRNA2 (300 ng/μL) and Cas9 (600 ng/μL) proteins were mixed together. The eggs oviposited within 2 h were selected and injected with InjectMan 4 of Eppendorf. A biological repetition includes three technical repetitions. In each technical replicate, 147 eggs in the treatment group (KO-Antp) and 100 eggs in the control group (ddH2O) were used. Three biological replicates were performed in batches. After the injection was completed, the eggs were collected into a Petri dish, and a suitable amount of fresh corn leaves were placed in the Petri dish to moisturize, and the Petri dish was placed in a 27 °C incubator. The hatching rate was counted three days after injection. One-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s multiple test were performed on the hatching rates of the three biological replicates (p < 0.05). The larvae phenotype was observed and photographed. The mutant DNA was extracted according to the instructions of TIANGEN TIANamp Genomic DNA Kit. The specific amplification primers SfAntp-F and SfAntp-R containing the target were used as a template for PCR and then sequenced.

2.5. Expression Changes of SfAntp Mutant Related Genes

A mutant was randomly selected, RNA was extracted using the Trizol method, cDNA was synthesized by reverse transcription, and stored at −80 °C. We searched NCBI for sequences of other Hox genes (Lab, Pb, Dfd, Scr, Ubx, Abd-A, Abd-B) and used Primer software (version 5) to design RT-qPCR primers (Table 1).

3. Results

3.1. Phylogenetic Analysis of SfAntp

The coding sequence of SfAntp was 912 bases. Phylogenetic analysis based on Antp sequences of 28 other insects showed that SfAntp was clustered with homologs of other Lepidoptera species and had the closest relationship with Spodoptera litura and Trichoplusia ni, suggesting that they were structurally conserved (Figure 1).

3.2. SfAntp Expression Profile Analysis

3.2.1. Expression Profile Analysis of SfAntp at Different Developmental Stages

SfAntp was expressed in the whole growth cycle of S. frugiperda; the expression level was the highest in the embryonic stage, while the expression level was lower in the larval, pupal and adult stages (Figure 2A). In order to speculate the possible role of SfAntp in the embryonic stage, total RNA was extracted from embryos at different developmental stages for RT-qPCR analysis. The results showed that the relative expression of SfAntp was the lowest at 6 h post oviposition (hpo), and the relative expression was higher at 12–48 hpo (Figure 2B).

3.2.2. Expression Analysis of SfAntp in Different Tissues of Male and Female Adults

SfAntp was expressed in all tissues of S. frugiperda. The expression level of SfAntp was the highest in the leg and thorax of the female adult, while the expression level was lower in the wing, head, antennae, abdominal and external genitalia (Figure 2C). The expression of SfAntp in the male adult was similar to that in the female adult (Figure 2D).

3.3. Phenotypic Changes Caused by SfAntp Mutation

The hatching rate was 15.19% in the treatment group and 67.67% in the control group 3 days after injection (Table 2). There is a significant embryonic lethality after the knockout, suggesting that Antp is essential for embryonic development of S. frugiperda.
The results of three biological replicates’ data analysis showed no significant difference, so the hatching rate was expressed as the average of three biological replicates.
In this study, SfAntp was knocked out by CRISPR/Cas9. In order to identify that the mutant phenotype was caused by injection of SfAntp-sgRNA and Cas9 protein, five mutants were randomly selected to extract genomic DNA. After DNA purification, it was ligated with the vector and transferred into competent cells for ampicillin screening. The genotype of the mutants was verified by monoclonal sequencing. The results showed that two mutants had different degrees of frameshift mutations at both targets, and three mutants had a frameshift mutation occurring in one target (Figure 3A,B).
The wild-type S. frugiperda larvae have 1 head segment, 3 thoracic segments (T1–T3) and 10 abdominal segments (A1–A10). There are three pairs of thoracic legs on T1–T3 (Figure 4A), four pairs of abdominal legs on A3–A6, and one pair of tail legs on A10 in larvae. After SfAntp was knocked out, the development of the thoracic legs of S. frugiperda was significantly affected. At the larval stage, the phenotypes of less thoracic legs, thoracic leg fusion, the protuberance structure between the head and the thoracic segments, fusion of the head and the thoracic segments, and thoracic leg development defects were produced (Figure 4B–F). Most of the mutant larvae that could hatch normally died before the fifth instar, and only the larvae with one T2 segment lacking one thoracic leg survived to the pupal stage, which then showed abnormal leg and wing development at the corresponding position of the pupal stage (Figure 4G). In addition, some S. frugiperda which did not show obvious mutation in the larval stage showed structural abnormalities when they developed to pupal stage, such as the absence and abnormal development of the corresponding positions of the thoracic leg and wing, incision-like segments in A3–A5 abdominal segments, and the preservation of leg-like projections in A5–A7 abdominal segments (Figure 5B–E). These results indicate that Antp has an important effect on the development of thoracic tissue during the development of S. frugiperda, and the deletion will lead to mutations in this part.

3.4. Expression Changes of SfAntp Mutant Related Genes

In order to understand how Antp plays a regulatory role in the Hox gene family, a pupal mutant was randomly selected and the relative expression of the Hox gene family was analyzed by RT-qPCR. The knockout efficiency of SfAntp was verified first, and the results showed that its expression level decreased significantly (Figure 6A). Then the expression of related genes was detected, Hox genes were downregulated to varying degrees, among which Scr, Ubx, Abd-A and Abd-B were most significantly downregulated (Figure 6B). At the same time, according to the effect of SfAntp on the leg development of S. frugiperda, the relative expression levels of four genes related to leg development and two cuticular protein genes were detected. The results showed that the leg development related genes Dac, Dll, Hth, Exd and the cuticular protein genes CPG24, CPG9 were significantly downregulated (Figure 6C).

4. Discussion

Hox genes are pivotal in the morphogenesis and evolutionary diversification of insect appendages. In the current investigation, we focused on Antp from the Hox gene family. Employing a suite of methodologies, including phylogenetic analysis, RT-qPCR, and the CRISPR/Cas9 genome-editing system, we meticulously examined the temporal and spatial expression patterns of SfAntp throughout the developmental stages of S. frugiperda. Additionally, we assessed the impact of SfAntp on the developmental processes in S. frugiperda.
The expression dynamics of SfAntp throughout the ontogeny of S. frugiperda were interrogated using RT-qPCR. The assay elucidated that SfAntp transcript levels peaked during the oogenesis, implying its primary function during early embryogenesis. Therefore, this experiment also detected the expression of SfAntp in different stages of embryonic development. It was found that SfAntp had a higher expression level between 12 h and 48 h of embryonic development. At the same time, the relative expression of SfAntp in different tissues of male and female adults was also detected. The results showed that SfAntp was highly expressed in the thoracic segments and legs of male and female adults, indicating that Antp was indeed involved in the regulation of thoracic segment and thoracic leg development.
To further investigate the functional role of SfAntp, two distinct sgRNA target sites were engineered within the first exon of SfAntp. Utilizing microinjection techniques, Cas9 protein in conjunction with the designed sgRNAs were introduced into S. frugiperda embryos. This targeted gene disruption of SfAntp precipitated a premature cessation of embryonic development, manifesting as increased embryonic lethality. A scant number of embryos successfully hatched. However, none of these specimens was viable to maturity, underscoring the critical function of SfAntp throughout the life cycle, particularly during embryogenesis and larval development in S. frugiperda.
The experimental disruption of SfAntp resulted in a constellation of mutant characteristics, including the fusion of thoracic segments, impairments of the thoracic appendages, and anomalous protuberances reminiscent of legs between the head and thoracic segments. These phenotypic alterations in S. frugiperda mirror those previously documented in B. mori, where Antp loss-of-function mutations prompted comparable developmental aberrations: thoracic segment fusion, incomplete thoracic and appendage morphogenesis, and the emergence of antenna-like structures interfacing the head with the thorax [19]. Phylogenetic analyses further corroborated the closely allied nature of SfAntp to other lepidopteran species, intimating the putative conservation of Antp’s regulatory sphere concerning thoracic segmentation and tissue development within lepidopteran insects. Moreover, peculiarities were observed in the mutagenized pupae, such as incision-like indentations in the A3–A5 abdominal segments and persistent larval leg-like protuberances within the A5–A7 regions, suggesting Antp’s role in the larval–pupal metamorphosis. In addition, in Drosophila, inhibition of the function of Antp will lead to a homologous transformation from the mid-posterior thorax to the anterior thorax, and Antp is closely related to the morphological determination of the thoracic leg [14]. These insights collectively endorse the concept of a conserved regulatory mechanism orchestrated by Antp across insect thoracic development.
Antp function extends beyond thoracic development; it is implicated in influencing other complex structures such as wings and eyespots in various Lepidoptera. In B. mori, Antp mutations have led to compromised wing development, resulting in smaller or malformed wings [31]. Similarly, Antp has been identified as crucial for the formation of butterfly eyespots, specifically in Bicyclus anynana, where it contributes to eyespot patterning on the forewings and determines the size of those on the hindwings [32]. In this study, SfAntp mutants of S. frugiperda never reached adulthood due to lethality at larval or pupal stages, rendering it impossible to directly observe adult wing formation. However, signs of abnormal wing development could be discerned in the pupae, paralleling the wing development issues seen in B. mori. The expression patterns of SfAntp in wild-type S. frugiperda suggest that although the gene is expressed in adult wings, its expression is more pronounced in the thorax and legs. This expression profile hints at a more dominant role of SfAntp in thoracic and appendage development compared to wings in S. frugiperda. This differential expression suggests that while SfAntp is important for wing development, its regulatory functions are more crucial or perhaps more complex in the development of the thorax and legs. Further research is warranted to fully elucidate the specific regulatory mechanisms of SfAntp within these various tissues and developmental stages.

5. Conclusions

The study involving CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of SfAntp at the embryonic stage in S. frugiperda has yielded significant insights. The knockout manifestly induced embryonic lethality, suggesting that SfAntp is crucial for initial developmental processes. Besides hindering normal development and pupation, the mutation concurrently suppressed the expression of additional Hox genes, elucidating a possible regulatory network wherein SfAntp influences or is integrated with the broader Hox gene cascade. The persistence of larval leg-like protrusions in the abdominal segments of mutant pupae infers a specific role for SfAntp in the metamorphic process, seemingly promoting the transition from larval to adult stages. These results provide candidate genes for genetic control of Lepidoptera pests such as S. frugiperda.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.Z., L.Z. and Q.W.; methodology, L.H., Q.W. and C.W.; software, L.H. and L.W.; validation, C.W., X.L. and T.L.; formal analysis, L.W.; investigation, X.L. and T.L.; resources, L.Z. and T.Z.; data curation, X.L. and T.L.; writing—original draft preparation, C.W. and L.H.; writing—review and editing, C.W.; visualization, X.L., L.H. and L.W.; supervision, T.Z., L.Z. and Q.W.; project administration, T.Z.; funding acquisition, L.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the grants from National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFD2300900) and Technology system of peanut industry in Henan Province (S2012-05-G06).

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kebede, M.; Shimalis, T. Out-break, distribution and management of fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda JE Smith in Africa: The status and prospects. Acad. Agric. J. 2018, 3, 551–568. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sparks, A.N. A review of the biology of the fall armyworm. Fla. Entomol. 1979, 62, 82–87. [Google Scholar]
  3. Griebler, M.; Westerlund, S.A.; Hoffmann, K.H.; Meyering-Vos, M. RNA interference with the allatoregulating neuropeptide genes from the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda and its effects on the JH titer in the hemolymph. J. Insect Physiol. 2008, 54, 997–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Stokstad, E. New crop pest takes Africa at lightning speed. Science 2017, 356, 473–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sharanabasappa, S.D.; Kalleshwaraswamy, C.M.; Asokan, R.; Mahadeva Swamy, H.M.; Maruthi, M.S.; Pavithra, H.B.; Hegbe, K.; Navi, S.; Prabhu, S.Y.; Goergen, G.E. First report of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), an alien invasive pest on maize in India. Pest Manag. Hortic. Ecosyst. 2018, 24, 23–29. [Google Scholar]
  6. Jiang, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhu, X. Analysis of occurrence dynamics and future trend of Spodoptera frugiperda invasion in China. China Plant Prot. 2019, 39, 33–35. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wu, K. Control strategies of Spodoptera frugiperda in China. Plant Prot. 2020, 46, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  8. Carroll, S.B. Homeotic genes and the evolution of arthropods and chordates. Nature 1995, 376, 479–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Schneuwly, S.; Klemenz, R.; Gehring, W.J. Redesigning the body plan of Drosophila by ectopic expressionof the homoeotic gene Antennapedia. Nature 1987, 325, 816–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Uhl, J.D.; Arya, Z.; Brian, G.; Angelike, S. A Hox transcription factor collective binds a highly conserved Distal-less cis-regulatory module to generate robust transcriptional outcomes. PLoS Genet. 2016, 12, e1005981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Carroll, S.B.; DiNardo, S.; O’Farrell, P.H.; White, R.; Scott, M. Temporal and spatial relationships between segmentation and homeotic gene expression in Drosophila embryos: Distributions of the fushi tarazu, engrailed, Sex combs reduced, Antennapedia, and Ultrabithorax proteins. Genes Dev. 1988, 2, 350–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Marco, R.V.; Diana, R.P.; Martha, V. Antennapedia: The complexity of a master developmental transcription factor. Genesis 2023, e23561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mlodzik, M.; Fjose, A.; Gehring, W.J. Molecular structure and spatial expression of a homeobox gene from the labial region of the Antennapedia-complex. EMBO J. 1988, 7, 2569–2578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wakimoto, B.T.; Kaufman, T.C. Analysis of larval segmentation in lethal genotypes associated with the Antennapedia gene complex in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev. Biol. 1981, 81, 51–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Struhl, G. Genes controlling segmental specification in the Drosophila thorax. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1982, 79, 7380–7384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Poliacikova, G.; Maurel-Zaffran, C.; Graba, Y.; Saurin, A.J. Hox Proteins in the regulation of muscle development. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 731996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Plaza, S.; Prince, F.; Jaeger, J.; Kloter, U.; Flister, S.; Benassayag, C.; Cribbs, D.; Gehring, W. Molecular basis for the inhibition of Drosophila eye development by Antennapedia. EMBO J. 2001, 20, 802–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sprecher, S.G.; Müller, M.; Kammermeier, L.; Miller, D.F.; Kaufman, T.C.; Reichert, H.; Hirth, F. Hox gene cross-regulatory interactions in the embryonic brain of Drosophila. Mech. Dev. 2004, 121, 527–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, P.; Tong, X.L.; Li, D.D.; Fu, M.Y.; He, S.Z.; Hu, H.; Xiang, Z.H.; Lu, C.; Dai, F.Y. Antennapedia is involved in the development of thoracic legs and segmentation in the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Heredity 2013, 111, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Deutsch, J. Hox and wings. Bioessays 2005, 27, 673–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Beeman, R.W.; Stuart, J.J.; Haas, M.S.; Denell, R.E. Genetic analysis of the homeotic gene complex (HOM-C) in the beetle Tribolium castaneum. Dev. Biol. 1989, 133, 196–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Khadjeh, S.; Turetzek, N.; Pechmann, M.; Schwager, E.E.; Wimmer, E.A.; Damen, W.G.; Prpic, N.-M. Divergent role of the Hox gene Antennapedia in spiders is responsible for the convergent evolution of abdominal limb repression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 4921–4926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Emmons, R.B.; Duncan, D.; Duncan, I. Regulation of the Drosophila distal antennal determinant spineless. Dev. Biol. 2007, 302, 412–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Estella, C.; Mann, R.S. Logic of Wg and Dpp induction of distal and medial fates in the Drosophila leg. Development 2008, 135, 627–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Luo, X.; Xu, Y.Q.; Jin, D.C.; Guo, J.J.; Yi, T.C. Role of the Hox genes, Sex combs reduced, Fushi tarazu and Antennapedia, in leg development of the spider mite Tetranychus urticae. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Saenko, S.V.; Marialva, M.S.; Beldade, P. Involvement of the conserved Hox gene Antennapedia in the development and evolution of a novel trait. EvoDevo 2011, 2, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Abzhanov, A.; Kaufman, T.C. Embryonic expression patterns of the Hox genes of the crayfish Procambarus clarkii (Crustacea, Decapoda). Evol. Dev. 2000, 2, 271–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ronshaugen, M.; McGinnis, N.; McGinnis, W. Hox protein mutation and macroevolution of the insect body plan. Nature 2002, 415, 914–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Di-Poi, N.; Montoya-Burgos, J.I.; Miller, H.; Pourquie, O.; Milinkovitch, M.C.; Duboule, D. Changes in Hox genes’ structure and function during the evolution of the squamate body plan. Nature 2010, 464, 99–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mansfield, J.H.; Abzhanov, A. Hox expression in the American alligator and evolution of archosaurian axial patterning. J. Exp. Zool. Part B Mol. Dev. Evol. 2010, 314, 629–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fang, C.Y.; Xin, Y.Q.; Sun, T.; Monteiro, A.; Ye, Z.F.; Dai, F.Y.; Lu, C.; Tong, X.L. The Hox gene Antennapedia is essential for wing development in insects. Development 2022, 149, dev199841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Matsuoka, Y.; Monteiro, A. Hox genes are essential for the development of eyespots in Bicyclus anynana butterflies. Genetics 2021, 217, iyaa005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Insects 15 00016 g001
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of SfAntp. The evolutionary histories of Antp were inferred using the neighbor-joining method. The percentages of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) are shown next to the branches. Evolutionary distances were computed using the Poisson correction method and are listed as the number of nucleotide substitutions per site. SfAntp was highlighted in yellow.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of SfAntp. The evolutionary histories of Antp were inferred using the neighbor-joining method. The percentages of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) are shown next to the branches. Evolutionary distances were computed using the Poisson correction method and are listed as the number of nucleotide substitutions per site. SfAntp was highlighted in yellow.
Insects 15 00016 g001
Insects 15 00016 g002
Figure 2. Expression analysis of SfAntp. (A) Expression profile of SfAntp at different developmental stages. (B) Expression profile of SfAntp in different developmental stages of embryos. (C) Expression profile of SfAntp in different tissues of female adults. (D) Expression profile of SfAntp in different tissues of male adults. I: Instar; MP: Male pupae; FP: Female pupae; MA: Male adult; FA: Female adult; Ant: Antennae; Tho: Thorax; Abd: Abdomen; Feg: Female external genitalia; Meg: Male external genitalia. The test of normality was performed using the Shapiro–Wilk method in SPSS Statistics software 26, IBM. One-way analysis of variance was used, and then Tukey’s test was used for multiple tests (p < 0.05). The different letters on each bar represent the significant differences between the samples. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM.
Figure 2. Expression analysis of SfAntp. (A) Expression profile of SfAntp at different developmental stages. (B) Expression profile of SfAntp in different developmental stages of embryos. (C) Expression profile of SfAntp in different tissues of female adults. (D) Expression profile of SfAntp in different tissues of male adults. I: Instar; MP: Male pupae; FP: Female pupae; MA: Male adult; FA: Female adult; Ant: Antennae; Tho: Thorax; Abd: Abdomen; Feg: Female external genitalia; Meg: Male external genitalia. The test of normality was performed using the Shapiro–Wilk method in SPSS Statistics software 26, IBM. One-way analysis of variance was used, and then Tukey’s test was used for multiple tests (p < 0.05). The different letters on each bar represent the significant differences between the samples. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM.
Insects 15 00016 g002
Insects 15 00016 g003
Figure 3. Mutant genotype detection. (above) Peak map of SfAntp. The mutant had a deletion of 3 bases at the sgRNA1 site and an insertion of 1 base at the sgRNA2 site. (below) Genotype of SfAntp. In the red box are the target sites of gene knockout. Regarding the number behind the genotype, red represents insertion, blue represents deletion, and black represents substitution.
Figure 3. Mutant genotype detection. (above) Peak map of SfAntp. The mutant had a deletion of 3 bases at the sgRNA1 site and an insertion of 1 base at the sgRNA2 site. (below) Genotype of SfAntp. In the red box are the target sites of gene knockout. Regarding the number behind the genotype, red represents insertion, blue represents deletion, and black represents substitution.
Insects 15 00016 g003
Insects 15 00016 g004
Figure 4. Larval phenotypes of SfAntp mutants induced by CRISPR/Cas9. (A) Wild-type larvae. (B) Less thoracic legs. (C,F) Thoracic leg fusion. (D) Leg-like projections between the head and thoracic segment. (E) Head and thoracic segment fusion and thoracic leg development defects. Scale bar = 100 μm. (G) Lack of a thoracic leg and tissue loss at the corresponding position of the thoracic leg and wing after pupation. The red arrows point to the mutation phenotype site. Scale bar = 1 mm.
Figure 4. Larval phenotypes of SfAntp mutants induced by CRISPR/Cas9. (A) Wild-type larvae. (B) Less thoracic legs. (C,F) Thoracic leg fusion. (D) Leg-like projections between the head and thoracic segment. (E) Head and thoracic segment fusion and thoracic leg development defects. Scale bar = 100 μm. (G) Lack of a thoracic leg and tissue loss at the corresponding position of the thoracic leg and wing after pupation. The red arrows point to the mutation phenotype site. Scale bar = 1 mm.
Insects 15 00016 g004
Insects 15 00016 g005
Figure 5. Pupal phenotypes of SfAntp mutants induced by CRISPR/Cas9. (A) Wild-type pupa. (B) Lack of thoracic leg corresponding position tissue. (C) Lack of thoracic leg corresponding position tissue, and preservation of larval leg processes in A5–A7 abdominal segment. (D) Lack of thoracic leg corresponding position tissue, preservation of larval leg processes in A5–A7 abdominal segment, and incision-like segments in A3–A5 abdominal segments. (E) The head and thoracic segments were hypoplastic, incision-like segments in A3–A5 abdominal segments. Scale bar = 1 mm.
Figure 5. Pupal phenotypes of SfAntp mutants induced by CRISPR/Cas9. (A) Wild-type pupa. (B) Lack of thoracic leg corresponding position tissue. (C) Lack of thoracic leg corresponding position tissue, and preservation of larval leg processes in A5–A7 abdominal segment. (D) Lack of thoracic leg corresponding position tissue, preservation of larval leg processes in A5–A7 abdominal segment, and incision-like segments in A3–A5 abdominal segments. (E) The head and thoracic segments were hypoplastic, incision-like segments in A3–A5 abdominal segments. Scale bar = 1 mm.
Insects 15 00016 g005
Insects 15 00016 g006
Figure 6. Expression changes of SfAntp mutant related genes compared to wild-type (WT). (A) Expression changes of SfAntp after knockout. (B) Expression of Hox gene family after SfAntp knockout. (C) Expression changes of four leg development related genes and two cuticular protein genes after SfAntp knockout. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM of three independent technical replications. **, p < 0.01.
Figure 6. Expression changes of SfAntp mutant related genes compared to wild-type (WT). (A) Expression changes of SfAntp after knockout. (B) Expression of Hox gene family after SfAntp knockout. (C) Expression changes of four leg development related genes and two cuticular protein genes after SfAntp knockout. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM of three independent technical replications. **, p < 0.01.
Insects 15 00016 g006
Table 1. Primers used in this study.
Table 1. Primers used in this study.
Primer NamePrimer Sequence (5′-3′)Primer Purpose
SfAntp-sgF-1GAAATTAATACGACTCACTATAGATGCCAGACATGAGGAACGGGTTTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGCAAGPreparation of sgRNA templates
SfAntp-sgF-2GAAATTAATACGACTCACTATAGTATGGCGCTGTGCCACAACAGTTTTAGAGCTAGAAATAGCAAGPreparation of sgRNA templates
Sf-sgRNA-RAAAAGCACCGACTCGGTGCCACTTTTTCAAGTTGATAACGGACTAGCCTTATTTTAACTTGCTATTTCTAGCTCTAAAACPreparation of sgRNA templates
SfAntp-FGATGAGCGCCAATAACTGCGIdentification of somatic mutations
SfAntp-RTTTGAGATGGACTGTCGGGCIdentification of somatic mutations
Antp-FACAACCACCTCCACAACAGCCRT-qPCR
Antp-RATCCTTCTCCTCCGCGTCART-qPCR
Lab-FGACTCAGGTCAAGATATGGTTCCART-qPCR
Lab-RCCCTTCTTTGATCCGCTTCTTTRT-qPCR
Pb-FGCGGGAGCCCCACATCRT-qPCR
Pb-RCTGTTGATAAAGCCGGTTTCGRT-qPCR
Dfd-FGACACCGCATCACCTTCACART-qPCR
Dfd-RAAGCAGAGCCGGGTCCATRT-qPCR
ScrGCACAAGATGGCATCGATGART-qPCR
ScrGGGTGGCCGTACGGATTCRT-qPCR
Ubx-FGGGCTCAGGACTAGGTGCACTART-qPCR
Ubx-RTTCCTGGACTGGAGGACTCACTRT-qPCR
Abd-A-FAGTTCCACCACCAGAATTTGTTCRT-qPCR
Abd-A-RTCCCAGTCCGCCAGACART-qPCR
Abd-B-FTTCCTCTTTAACGCTTACRT-qPCR
Abd-B-RAGTTCTTCTTGTTCTTCATRT-qPCR
Dac-FGGCGGGCTGCACACART-qPCR
Dac-RGCACACCAGCGGCACTATGRT-qPCR
Dll-FCCAGTCTCGGCCTCACACART-qPCR
Dll-RACTGCGGCGGTTTTGGART-qPCR
Hth-FTCCACCCCCGATGTCAGART-qPCR
Hth-RTCACCGCTCCACCGTATGART-qPCR
Exd-FCAACACGCAAGAGGAGGART-qPCR
Exd-RGCCAACTTCGCACGGTAGRT-qPCR
CPG24ATGAAGTTTTTGGTTGTATTGGTCGRT-qPCR
CPG24CATAAATTCCTCTCTTCTCCTGCTTRT-qPCR
CPG9TCTGGACACCATCATCAAATTGRT-qPCR
CPG9GCTGTGCTCCTTCTTCACGTACRT-qPCR
GAPDH-FGAAGTCAAGTCCGTGGAGATGRT-qPCR
GAPDH-RGACCTGTGAAGTCGRT-qPCR
Table 2. CRISPR/Cas9 injection results.
Table 2. CRISPR/Cas9 injection results.
GeneCas9 Protein/sgRNA1/sgRNA2
Concentration (ng/μL)		Number of InjectionsNumber of Hatching
Antp600/300/30044167 (15.19%)
ddH2O-300203 (67.67%)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, C.; Zhao, T.; Liu, X.; Li, T.; He, L.; Wang, Q.; Wang, L.; Zhou, L. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Mutagenesis of Antennapedia in Spodoptera frugiperda. Insects 2024, 15, 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15010016

AMA Style

Wang C, Zhao T, Liu X, Li T, He L, Wang Q, Wang L, Zhou L. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Mutagenesis of Antennapedia in Spodoptera frugiperda. Insects. 2024; 15(1):16. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15010016

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Congke, Te Zhao, Xiaolong Liu, Tianliang Li, Leiming He, Qinqin Wang, Li Wang, and Lin Zhou. 2024. "CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Mutagenesis of Antennapedia in Spodoptera frugiperda" Insects 15, no. 1: 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15010016

APA Style

Wang, C., Zhao, T., Liu, X., Li, T., He, L., Wang, Q., Wang, L., & Zhou, L. (2024). CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Mutagenesis of Antennapedia in Spodoptera frugiperda. Insects, 15(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15010016

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop