A Survey in Hawaii for Parasitoids of Citrus Whiteflies (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), for Introduction into Greece
by
, , , and
Maria-Vasiliki Giakoumaki
1, 
Panagiotis Milonas
1,
Spyridon Antonatos
1,
Vasiliki Evangelοu
1,
George Partsinevelos
1,
Dimitrios Papachristos
1 and
Mohsen M. Ramadan
2,* 1
Scientific Directorate of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology, Benaki Phytopathological Institute, 14561 Kifissia, Greece
2
Division of Plant Industry, Hawaii Department of Agriculture, Honolulu, HI 96814, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2023, 14(11), 858; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14110858
Submission received: 27 September 2023
/
Revised: 31 October 2023
/
Accepted: 3 November 2023
/
Published: 4 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection Balancing Nature: Biological Control Introductions for Invasive Insect Pests and Weeds)
Abstract
:Simple Summary
The orange spiny whitefly, Aleurocanthus spiniferus, has invaded Greece and expanded its distribution in other countries in the European Union since 2008. It is a polyphagous pest that includes several highly important crop plants, such as citrus. Damage symptoms and effects on plants are identical to those of the citrus blackfly, Aleurocanthus woglumi (both Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). The species also share a complex of natural enemies that were successfully introduced to Hawaii during 1974–1998. A short expedition to the islands of Oahu, Hawaii, and Kauai was conducted to retrieve the prominent natural enemies for introduction into Greece. Hawaii was chosen because it does not have citrus diseases and because of the existence of connections to facilitate research and export permits. Infested leaves were shipped to a quarantine facility in Greece for parasitoid emergence and evaluation. The identity of emerged parasitoids and host testing on the orange-spiny whitefly Greece strain were conducted. Only one parasitoid was abundant, characterized using molecular analysis as Encarsis perplexa. A summary of infestation records, parasitism rates, and localities on the Hawaiian Islands has been reported here for the first time since the release of parasitoids. Results showed that the infestations of citrus trees were minimal on the islands of Hawaii and Oahu, primarily on pummelo and sweet orange. Citrus whiteflies were not detected on the island of Kauai during this survey. E. perplexa had parasitism rates ranging from 0 to 28% on the island of Hawaii and 11 to 65% on the island of Oahu. A starter colony of the parasitoids has been colonized in the Greece Quarantine Facility for evaluation. This was the first field survey of Hawaii since the introduction and release of citrus whitefly natural enemies. Further surveys should be repeated in different countries to eliminate the risk of disease introduction.
Abstract
Whitefly species of Aleurocanthus spiniferus (Quaintance) and A. woglumi Ashby (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) are serious pests of citrus and other important fruit crops. The problem of citrus has initiated the successful introduction of several natural enemies for biocontrol programs in Hawaii and many other countries. Here, we summarized the history of infestation and biocontrol efforts of the two whiteflies in Hawaii for possible parasitoid importation into Greece. Two Platygasteridae (Amitus hesperidum Silvestri, A. spiniferus (Brethes), and three Aphelinidae (Encarsia clypealis (Silvestri), E. smithi (Silvestri), E. perplexa Huang, and Polaszek) were released in Hawaii for biocontrol of the citrus whiteflies during the period 1974–1999. The aphelinid Cales noacki Howard, purposely released for Aleurothrixus flococcus (Maskell) in 1982, was also reported to attack other whiteflies, including Aleurocanthus species, on citrus. An additional aphelinid parasitoid, Encarsia nipponica Silvestri, native to Japan and China, was accidentally introduced and found to attack both citrus whiteflies on the islands. Since the colonization of introduced parasitoids in infested fields on four Hawaiian Islands, no survey has been conducted to evaluate their potential impact. We conducted two short surveys during September–November 2022 on the islands of Kauai, Hawaii, and Oahu to introduce the dominant parasitoids to Greece for the biocontrol of A. spiniferus. Results showed that the infestation level was very low on Kauai, Hawaii, and Oahu Islands, with a mean infestation level range of 1.4–3.1 on Hawaii and Oahu Islands, mostly on pummelo and sweet orange, with no detection on the island of Kauai. The dominant parasitoid was characterized as Encarsia perplexa, using molecular analysis. Its parasitism rates ranged from 0 to 28% on the island of Hawaii and 11 to 65% on the island of Oahu. Emerged parasitoids have been reared in Greece for evaluation. This was the first field survey of Hawaii since the introduction and release of citrus whitefly natural enemies.
1. Introduction
The orange spiny whitefly, Aleurocanthus spiniferus (Quaintance), and citrus blackfly, A. woglumi Ashby (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), are two of the most important and hazardous citrus pests [1,2]. Both species are regulated as quarantine pests for the European Union [3]. Aleurocanthus woglumi has not invaded Europe yet. However, climatic modeling predicts that areas in the Mediterranean basin are suitable for establishment [4]. Aleurocanthus spiniferus has already invaded Europe, with the first record in Italy in 2008 [5]. Since then, its distribution in the European Union has expanded, including Albania [6], Croatia [7], Greece [1], and Montenegro [8]. Both species cause similar symptoms to the infested host plants. In Hawaii, during a heavily infested period in 1998, infested trees were not fruiting, with a range of 50–>600 citrus blackfly pupae per infested leaf ([2], Ramadan, Hawaii Department of Agriculture (HDOA) unpublished record). The main hosts are citrus species, but they are quite polyphagous, with a wide host range that includes mangoes and coffee [9]. Direct damage is caused by nymphs that suck the sap from the leaves, causing a lack of nutrients and water. Additionally, nymphs excrete honeydew drops that fall on the leaves, where the growth of sooty mold is promoted, which eventually covers the whole upper surface of the infested leaves. Both A. spiniferus and A. woglumi originate from Southeastern Asia [4,10]. In their native area, they are not considered major pests; however, during the 20th century, both species invaded other parts of the world, causing substantial damage, mainly to citrus crops [2,3,4]. Following their accidental introduction to new areas, biological control programs were initiated to mitigate the damage caused by the outbreaks of the two whiteflies [2,10,11,12,13,14].
In the early seventies, A. spiniferus was introduced in Hawaii on rose foliage in Honolulu, Oahu Island, in 1974. Subsequent surveys discovered it on navel orange, lime, tangerine, and pear, but infestations were reportedly low [15]. Two decades later, A. woglumi was also found being introduced on the main Hawaiian Islands [15,16]. In both cases, the introduction of citrus whitefly species followed the introduction of biological control agents to compact their population outbreaks. Specifically, the parasitoid Encarsia smithi Silvestri and E. clypealis (Silvestri) (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) were introduced in the islands of Oahu and Hawaii [17] to control A. spiniferus, and E. perplexa Huang and Polaszek (Hymenoptera, Aphelinidae) (misidentified at that time as Encarsia opulenta Silvestri) and Amitus hesperidum Silvestri (Hymenoptera: Platygastridae) were introduced to control A. woglumi [16], Table 1. Encarsia smithi was introduced to the island of Oahu from Japan in 1974, among three other Aphelinid species that were found to naturally parasitize A. spiniferus in Oahu. Encarsia smithi was the most important species, leading to a sufficient reduction of the A. spiniferus population [17]. It was also reported on A. woglumi (Table 1). In 1998, exploratory investigations were carried out in Central America in Guatemala, and two parasitoid species, E. perplexa and A. hesperidum, were introduced to Hawaii. The wasps were mass-reared on Oahu and released on other islands (Table 1). The two wasp species managed to disperse naturally and successfully controlled the population of A. woglumi in all releasing sites (Table 1) [18]. Another parasitoid, E. nipponica Silvestri, native to Japan and China, was discovered accidentally as a parasitoid of both whiteflies with low parasitism ranging from 0 to 11.5% (n = 103 infested leaves, Ramadan unpublished data). Similarly, the aphelind parasitoid, Cales noacki Howard, was released in 1981 for biological control of Aleurothrixus floccosus (Maskell), subsequently reported to attack Aleurocanthus species on citrus [19], HDOA records. There has been no field evaluation since the introduction and release of all the parasitoids, but citrus growers on the islands were content, and less chemical control was used in their fields [2].
The recent invasion of A. spiniferus in the European Union and Greece, in particular, has caused the initiation of a new biological control program against this pest by introducing exotic natural enemies. Moreover, since the introduction of these parasitoids in Hawaii, no surveys have been conducted to determine the status of A. woglumi or A. spiniferus in the islands and the presence and abundance of their introduced parasitoids. Thus, an exploratory investigation on the Hawaiian Islands was performed to investigate the current parasitism rate of A. woglumi and to identify the parasitoid assembly species that were present in the populations of the pests. The results of those short surveys will provide crucial information to examine the possibility of a successful introduction of those parasitoids, either in Greece or in any other area where those serious pests have been established.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Collection and Emergence of Parasitoids
Two surveys were performed in September and November 2022 on the islands of Hawaii, Kauai, and Oahu (Figure 1). A total of 62 sites located on the three Hawaiian Islands were surveyed (Hawaii Island with the GPS coordinates of 19°44′30.3180″ N, 155°50′39.9732″ W; Oahu Island GPS coordinates of 21°18′56.1708″ N, 157°51′29.1348″ W; Kauai Island GPS coordinates of 22°6′30.7548″ N, 159°29′48.3540″ W (https://www.latlong.net (accessed on accessed on 25 October 2023)).
Host plants (mainly citrus trees) were macroscopically surveyed for citrus whitefly infestation, and infested leaves were collected (Table 2 and Table 3). Citrus whiteflies have been very rare to be found in Hawaii in recent years. Sites were selected as orchards of citrus, trees in agriculture experimental stations, and local residential homes were examined with the permission of landlords. Sites were selected randomly for the survey team to enter property everywhere on the visited islands. Based on the presence of citrus trees, the survey team searched the trees for infestations and obtained permission to clip infested branches or leaves. Leaves with mature whiteflies were picked, not those with only eggs or small nymphs that would not produce parasitoids.
The infested leaves were placed in paper envelopes, which were sealed (AJM paper grocery, lunch bags, USA, of different sizes as needed for holding infested leaves). Plastic bags are not suitable for live insects, https://www.gofoodservice.com/brand/ajm (accessed on 10 September 2023). Infested leaves were picked according to the stage of the nymphs of the citrus blackfly. Leaves that carried all the stages and older nymphs were preferred. Leaves with mature nymphs (third and fourth nymphs) were preferred for collection. Leaves with eggs—second nymphs—were not collected since parasitoids from such leaves may not develop in the holding containers.
At the end of each collection day, all envelopes with leaf samples were transported to the insectary of the Hawaii Department of Agriculture, Plant Pest Control Branch in Honolulu. In the insectary, the leaves were carefully removed from the envelopes and placed in 70 mesh clear vinyl nylon screen collapsible lightweight aluminum cages (30 × 30 × 60 cm) appropriate for parasitic wasps′ emergence (https://www.bioquip.com (accessed on 20 October 2023)). Minute honey drops were placed on the inner surface of the mesh as food for adult wasps. We used smeared drops of SUE BEE® SPUN® honey on the inside cage sides and top for adult parasitoid feeding as indicated by HDOA insect rearing (https://siouxhoney.com/sue-bee-spun-honey/ (accessed on 20 July 2022)). Emerged adult parasitoids were aspirated and collected in falcon vials with tiny honey drops (Falcon 50 mL Conical Centrifuge Tubes; Fisher Scientific: A Thermo Fisher Scientific Brand (https://www.fishersci.com/shop/products/falcon-50ml-conical-centrifuge-tubes (accessed on 15 September 2023)).
Emerged parasitoids and remaining infested leaves were shipped to Greece and placed in the containment facility in the biosecurity greenhouse at the Scientific Directorate of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology, Benaki Phytopathological Institute (38°04′52.0″ N 23°48′47.9″ E). Emerged parasitoids were placed inside mesh cages with bitter orange Citrus aurantium L. (Rutaceae) seedlings infested by A. spiniferus in the biosecurity greenhouse under controlled environmental conditions of 25 °C ± 2 °C, R.H. 60–70%, and natural daylight photoperiod (daylight hours 6:40 a.m.–5:30 p.m.). Citrus aurantium seedlings were in mesh cages (45 × 45 × 45 cm), which were put inside larger ones (60 × 60 × 60 cm, 70 mesh). Polyester Chiffon white breathable fabric was used to cover cages for rearing delicate encyrtid-size parasitoids (https://www.moodfabrics.com/fashion-fabrics/polyester/chiffon (accessed on 10 October 2023)).
2.2. Identification of the Parasitoids
The identification of emergent parasitoids was based on morphological characteristics and molecular analyses. Morphological identification was performed according to appropriate keys and illustrations [20,21,22,23]. For distinguishing Amitus hesperidum: The female is shiny black (0.75 mm long). The female′s antenna is ten-segmented, with the last three segments forming a club. The male is like the female, with a filiform ten-segmented antenna and curved scape. A lateral plate-like process on the male fourth antennal segment is characteristic of the species, Figure 2D [20,21,23]. For identification of Encarsia perplexa, the mid lobe of the mesoscutum is dark, and T1 and T2 of the gaster are largely pale (Figure 2C). The male head is like that of the female. The mesosoma is orange–yellow except for the pronotum. The anterior half of the mid lobe of the mesoscutum, the propodeum, and the petiole are dark brown. The gaster is brown to dark (Figure 2C). Other characteristics for the differentiation of closely related species are explained in [22]. The specimens were prepared for slide mounting as described in slide preparation of chalcidoids by Noyes [24,25,26].
The insects that were destined for molecular analysis were stored in 1.5 mL microtubes with snap-cap RNase and DNase-free ClearLine®, filled with 98% ethanol (Analytical Grade, Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH, USA). The specimens were stored and coded separately. In total, DNA was extracted from 45 parasitoids by using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. At the beginning of the procedure, every single insect was left on a filter paper until the ethanol was completely removed and the final DNA volume reached 20 μL. Two sets of primers were used for species determination during the polymerase chain reaction, targeting the genes of Cytochrome Oxidase I (COI) and 28S ribosomal RNA, which can further investigate the species′ determination [27,28]. For the amplification of the barcoding gene, the primers LCO-1490 (5′-GGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTGG-3′) and HCO-2198 (5′-TAAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAATCA-3′) were used [29], while the sets 28S-D2-F (5′-AGAGAGAGTTCAAGAGTACGTG-3′) and 28S-D2-R (5′-TTGGTCCGTGTTTCAAGACGGG-3′) were used for the amplification of the 28S gene [30].
Each PCR reaction mixture for both primer sets contained 5 µL of 10× PCR buffer, 1.5 µL of MgCl2 (50 mM), 0.5 µL of dNTPs (10 mM), 1 µL of each primer (10 µM), 5 µL of template DNA (20–40 ng), 0.5 μL of the thermostable Taq DNA polymerase (Platinum, Invitrogen), and molecular-grade water (up to 50 µL). The thermocycling program included an initial denaturation step of 3 min at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 51 °C (LCO-HCO) or 58 °C (28S) for 45 s, and 72 °C for 1 min, and a final step of extension at 72 °C for 5 min.
The two template amplifications were confirmed separately by using 5 μL of the PCR products on 1.2% agarose gel electrophoresis, which finally resulted in the observation of an expected length product of 658 bp and 550 bp, respectively. The rest of the volume of 45 μL was purified according to the supplier’s instructions for the NucleoFast 96 PCR Clean-up kit (Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co. KG, Düren, Germany) and then forwarded to Macrogen Europe (Netherlands) for automated sequencing analysis. The obtained sequencing results were optimized, generated, and aligned through the software Geneious Prime 2023.0.1 (https://www.geneious.com/ (accessed on 10 June 2023)). The produced sequences were checked for their authenticity at the genus or species level according to the BLAST public interface of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI—https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (accessed on 10 June 2023).
2.3. Infestation and Parasitism Rate
The parasitism rate of Amitus sp. and Encarsia sp. to A. woglumi from the collected leaves was estimated from the exit holes on the body of the nymphs. The exit hole of A. woglumi adults differs from the exit hole of the parasitoids by the shape of exit holes on the shells. The holes due to the exit of the parasitoids are circular and placed at the back of the nymph, while those from the exit hole of A. woglumi adults are T-shaped slits (Figure 2A,E). To determine the parasitism rate, all nymphs on each leaf were counted under a Nikon SMZ-745 stereomicroscope in the laboratory. The nymphs were listed as “parasitized″ if the shells had parasitoid circular exit holes, as in Figure 2E. All the emerged parasitoids were Encarsia perplexa. The unparasitized nymphs had the T-shape exit slit of the A. woglumi, as in Figure 2A, while broken shells were excluded from the results. Finally, the leaf samples were frozen at −20 °C for 72 h before being discarded.
The level of infestation was determined by the population size of the citrus blackfly, which was categorized depending on the total number of nymphs per leaf and the total number of infested leaves collected per location. The infestation was scored as follows: 1 = 1–10 nymphs, 2 = 11–30 nymphs, 3 = 31–99 nymphs, and 4 = ≥100 nymphs per leaf. An average score was calculated for each location. Since we collected only infested leaves, there was no 0 score. The eggs of the citrus blackfly were excluded from the score.
The maps were made using ArcGIS Pro, Version 3.0.3 (Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., https://www.esri.com (accessed on 17 July 2023), ESRI, and Natural Earth (free vector and raster map data @ naturalearthdata.com).
3. Results and Discussion
Survey results indicated that A. woglumi populations are rare in the Hawaiian Islands. Out of the 62 locations inspected for A. woglumi populations, its presence was found in only 11 sites (Figure 1). On Kauai Island, no infestation was found, and on Hawaii Island, A. woglumi populations were found in just 3 sites out of the 23 inspected. Moreover, the infestation rate was quite low (level of infestation 1.37–3.14), and only isolated citrus trees either on Oahu or in the Hawaii Islands were found with a large number of infested leaves (≥10 leaves/tree). Throughout the survey, populations of other Aleyrodidae were very low, and only a few isolated populations of Aleurothrixus floccosus (Maskell) and Aleurodicus dispersus Russell were found.
Parasitism of A. woglumi nymphs was much higher on Oahu than on Hawaii Island. Parasitism rates ranged from 0 to 28% on Hawaii Island and 11 to 65% on Oahu Island (Table 2 and Table 3).
Based on the morphological and molecular data, the emerging parasitoids were identified as E. perplexa. A few emerging parasitoids were identified as Amitus spiniferus Brethes, a parasitoid introduced to Hawaii for A. floccosus.
Specifically, the molecular comparison via the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) database resulted in high similarity rates, suggesting that the analyzed parasitoids undoubtedly belong to the genus Encarsia. Most of the consensus sequence produced belongs to A. hesperidum. Our survey results were similar to those of E. perplexa, at a range of 98.6 to 99.5%. The NCBI contained only limited data for the genus Amitus for both genes, a fact that limited the determination of some individuals to the genus level. Sequencing data provided by the USDA supports the claim that these parasitoids are highly similar to the species Amitus spiniferus, much more so than to A. hesperidum.
Our survey results confirm that A. woglumi on the Hawaiian Islands is effectively controlled by the introduced natural enemies and that E. perplexa is the dominant parasitoid species [2]. We were not able to find A. hesperidum either due to competition with E. perplexa or because its population is at very low levels, not being detectable with our sampling effort during this short survey. In other locations where both E. perplexa and A. hesperidum have been released to control A. woglumi, soon after the reduction in the infestation, E. perplexa had become the dominant species. This is mainly due to its longer lifespan compared to A. hesperidum. The latter is considered an effective parasitoid at high densities of its host, whereas E. perplexa is more efficient at low host densities [11].
In 1997, the infestation by A. woglumi was so severe on Oahu Island that every citrus tree, including oranges, lemons, and pummelo, had a range of 50–>600 citrus blackfly pupae/leaf (Figure 2A). In 1998, all citrus trees on Oahu (urban trees and orchards) had been reduced to no fruiting from the high infestation. There were complaints from citrus growers on the Hawaii and Kauai Islands requesting parasitoid introductions. Recently, there have been no reports of damage incurred by the pest or reports of growers or stakeholders having issues with citrus blackflies.
Non-citrus trees and ornamental shrubs (orange jasmine, Murraya paniculate (L.), Rutaceae) were also utilized for oviposition but were not normally affected by this whitefly. The mean number of egg masses/leaflet was 16.4 ± 2.8 (n = 25, during June 1997, Oahu Island) and 22.4 ± 3.1 eggs/mass (n = 22). Citrus blackfly eggs hatched with no development beyond the first nymph on non-citrus trees.
The infestation in 1997 was the worst on lemon trees (419.4 ± 32.4 pupae/leaf). Pummelo Citrus maxima (Burm.) Merr., the infestation was even higher with 112.5 ± 14.0 nymphs/cm2 leaf, compared with Meyer lemon, Citrus meyeri Yu. Tanaka (45.8 ± 15.0 nymphs/cm2 leaf), pink tecoma, Tabebuia rosea DC., Bignoniaceae (13.8 ± 2.1 nymphs/cm2 leaf), and mango (5.5 ± 1.3 nymphs/cm2 leaf). These records demonstrated the potential of the citrus blackfly to infest the Hawaiian citrus and mango trees even faster than any other mainland state because of the favorite environmental conditions [2] and unpublished data.
From the adult parasitoids that emerged either in Hawaii and shipped into Greece or emerged as adults in the quarantine facility of Benaki Phytopathological Institute in Athens, >3000 adults were introduced into rearing cages with young Citrus aurantium plants infested with A. spiniferus. Parasitoids were introduced into the cages as they emerged from A. woglumi nymphs for a period of almost 20 days. Only E. perplexa adults emerged, and they did not parasitize A. spiniferus in Greece. Parasitoids remain alive even after 30 days without parasitizing any A. spiniferus nymphs. Encarsia perplexa is known to parasitize A. woglumi, Aleuroclava kuwani (Takahashi), and Aleuroplatus pectiniferus Quaintance and Baker [22]. Amitus hesperidum was not recovered from the shipments. The parasitoid A. hesperidum was difficult to record even soon after its initial release on the Hawaiian Islands due to extremely low population densities, which was also confirmed by the current surveys. Encarsia smithi, a known parasitoid of A. spiniferus, has been found in the past on Oahu Island [16] but was not recovered during the current surveys.
The current study confirms that A. woglumi is efficiently controlled by natural enemies on the Hawaiian Islands and that the dominant parasitoid is E. perplexa. Amitus hesperidum is either extinct or may have been present in extremely low populations due to the very low host density and scattered populations of A. woglumi. That parasitoid has a short adult life span, which limits its searching efficiency for new suitable hosts to parasitize. According to the results of the surveys and the laboratory experiments, we can conclude that the parasitoid E. perplexa, which was recovered on the Hawaiian Islands, is able to control A. woglumi but is not the appropriate species for A. spiniferus. Additional exploratory surveys are ongoing in Southeast Asia, aiming to locate A. hesperidum or other Encarsia species that are reported to parasitize the orange spiny whitefly.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, M.-V.G., P.M., M.M.R. and S.A.; methodology, M.-V.G., P.M., M.M.R. and S.A.; software, G.P., D.P. and V.E.; validation, M.-V.G., P.M., M.M.R. and S.A.; formal analysis, M.-V.G., P.M., M.M.R. and S.A.; investigation, M.-V.G., P.M., M.M.R., G.P. and S.A.; resources, P.M. and M.M.R.; data curation, M.-V.G., P.M., M.M.R., D.P., V.E. and S.A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.-V.G., P.M., M.M.R. and S.A.; writing—review and editing, M.-V.G., P.M., M.M.R., D.P., V.E. and S.A.; visualization, M.-V.G. and M.M.R.; supervision, M.-V.G., P.M., S.A. and G.P.; project administration, P.M. and M.M.R.; funding acquisition, P.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was partially funded by the Greek Ministry of Rural Development and Food, contract number 22SYMV010343981, 2022-04-07.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
Acknowledgments
Iro Georgopoulou (Benaki Phytopathological Institute, Greece) is thanked for creating the maps. We also thank Craig Kaneshige (Hawaii Department of Agriculture) for helping with the transportation of the team members during the Kauai Island survey. Photos are credited to Walter Nagamine and Ron Heu (Hawaii Department of Agriculture, Plant Pest Control Branch). The authors greatly value the reviewer’s comments.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Kapantaidaki, D.E.; Antonatos, S.; Kontodimas, D.; Milonas, P.; Papachristos, D.P. Presence of the invasive whitefly Aleurocanthus spiniferus (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in Greece. Bull. OEPP/EPPO Bull. 2019, 49, 127–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramadan, M.M.; Kaufman, L.V.; Wright, M.G. Insect and weed biological control in Hawaii: Recent case studies and trends. Biol. Control 2023, 179, 105170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- EFSA Plant Health Panel (EFSA PLH Panel); Bragard, C.; Dehnen-Schmutz, K.; Di Serio, F.; Gonthier, P.; Jacques, M.A.; Jaques Miret, J.A.; Justesen, A.F.; Magnusson, C.S.; Milonas, P.; et al. Scientific Opinion on the pest categorisation of Aleurocanthus spp. EFSA J. 2018, 16, e05436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Akrivou, A.; Georgopoulou, I.; Papachristos, D.P.; Milonas, P.G.; Kriticos, D.J. Potential global distribution of Aleurocanthus woglumi considering climate change and irrigation. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0261626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porcelli, F. First record of Aleurocanthus spiniferus (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) in Puglia, Southern Italy. EPPO Bull. 2008, 38, 516–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nugnes, F.; Laudonia, S.; Jesu, G.; Jansen, M.G.M.; Bernardo, U.; Porcelli, F. Aleurocanthus spiniferus (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in Some European Countries: Diffusion, Hosts, Molecular Characterization, and Natural Enemies. Insects 2020, 11, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Šimala, M.; Masten Milek, T. First record of the orange spiny whitefly, Aleurocanthus spiniferus Quaintance, 1903 (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), in Croatia. In Plant Zbornik predavanj in Referatov 11. Slovenskega Posvetovanja o Varstvu Rastlin z Mednarodno Udeležbo Bled; Plant Protection Society of Slovenia: Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Radonjic, S.; Hrncic, S.; Malumphy, C. First Record of Aleurocanthus spiniferus (Quaintance) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in Montenegro. CRA—Res. Cent. Agrobiol. Pedol. 2014, 97, 141–154. [Google Scholar]
- EFSA (European Food Safety Authority); Schrader, G.; Camilleri, M.; Ciubotaru, R.M.; Diakaki, M.; Vos, S. Pest survey card on Aleurocanthus spiniferus and Aleurocanthus woglumi. EFSA Support. Publ. 2019, 16, 1565E. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uesugi, R.; Yara, K.; Sato, Y. Changes in population density of Aleurocanthus camelliae (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and parasitism rate of Encarsia smithi (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) during the early invasion stages. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2016, 51, 581–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, R.; Brasil, J.R.; Poucher, C. Population density of the citrus blackfly, Aleurocanthus woglumi Ashby (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae), and its parasites in urban Florida in 1979–1981. Environ. Entomol. 1983, 12, 878–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dowell, R.V. Factors affecting the field effectiveness of Encarsia opulenta (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), a parasitoid of citrus blackfly, Aleurocanthus woglumi (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Trop. Agric. 1989, 66, 110–112. [Google Scholar]
- Lopez, V.F.; Kairo, M.T.; Pollard, G.V.; Pierre, C.; Commodore, N.; Dominique, D. Post-release survey to assess impact and potential host range expansion by Amitus hesperidum and Encarsia perplexa, two parasitoids introduced for the biological control of the citrus blackfly, Aleurocanthus woglumi in Dominica. BioControl 2009, 54, 497–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yamashita, K.; Kasai, A.; Suzuki, Y.; Yoshiyasu, Y. Population dynamics of the camellia spiny whitefly, Aleurocanthus camelliae (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), in tea fields during the early phase of invasion into Kyoto, Japan. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2016, 51, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United States Department of Agriculture. New United States records—Orange spiny whitefly (Aleurocanthus spiniferus (Quaintance)—Hawaii. Coop. Econ. Insect Rep. 1974, 24, 585. [Google Scholar]
- Culliney, T.W.; Nagamine, W.T.; Teramoto, K.K. Introductions for Biological Control in Hawaii 1997–2001. Proc. Hawaii. Entomol. Soc. 2003, 36, 145–153. [Google Scholar]
- Nakao, H.K.; Funasaki, G.Y. Introductions for biological control in Hawaii: 1975 and 1976. Proc. Hawaii. Entomol. Soc. 1979, 23, 125–128. [Google Scholar]
- Heu, R.A.; Nagamine, W.T. Citrus Blackfly Aleurocanthus woglumi Ashby (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). New Pest Advisory 2001, 99-03. Available online: https://hdoa.hawaii.gov/pi/files/2013/01/npa99-03_citrusbf.pdf (accessed on 10 July 2023).
- Rossato, V. Ocorrência de Parasitóides de Aleurocanthus woglumi Ashby, 1903 (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) e seu Parasitismo por Cales noacki Howard, 1907 (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) nos Municípios de Belém, Capitão Poço e Irituia no Estado do Pará. Master’s Thesis, Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia, Belém, Brazil, 2007; p. 40. [Google Scholar]
- MacGown, M.W.; Nebeker, T.E. Taxonomic review of Amitus (Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidae, Platygastridae). Can. Ent. 1978, 110, 275–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Viggiani, G.; Mazzone, P. The Amitus Hald. (Hym. Platygastridae) of Italy, with description of three new species. Boll. Lab. Entomol. Agrar. “Filippo Silvestri” Portici 1978, 39, 59–69. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, J.; Polaszek, A. A revision of the Chinese species of Encarsia Forster (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae): Parasitoids of whiteflies, scale insects and aphids (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae, Diaspididae, Aphidoidea). J. Nat. Hist. 1998, 32, 1825–1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, R. Amitus hesperidum (Hymenoptera: Platygasteridae), a parasite of the citrus blackfly (Aleurocanthus woglumi). Florida Department of Agricultural Consumer Services, Division Plant Industry. Entomol. Circular. 1988, 311, 1–2. [Google Scholar]
- Noyes, J.S. Universal Chalcidoidea Database. World Wide Web Electronic Publication. 2023. Available online: http://www.nhm.ac.uk/chalcidoids (accessed on 30 October 2023).
- Noyes, J.S. Collecting and preserving chalcid wasps (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). J. Nat. Hist. 1982, 16, 315–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noyes, J.S. Chapter 2.7.2.5. Chalcid parasitoids. In The Armored Scale Insects. Their Biology, Naural Enemies and Control; Rosen, D., Ed.; World Crop Pests; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Oxford, UK; New York, NY, USA; Tokyo, Japan, 1990; Volume 4B, pp. 247–262. [Google Scholar]
- Hebert, P.D.; Cywinska, A.; Ball, S.L.; deWaard, J.R. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2003, 270, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pentinsaari, M.; Salmela, H.; Mutanen, M.; Roslin, T. Molecular evolution of a widely-adopted taxonomic marker (COI) across the animal tree of life. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Folmer, O.; Black, M.; Hoeh, W.; Lutz, R.; Vrijenhoek, R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 1994, 3, 294–299. [Google Scholar]
- Dowton, M.; Austin, A.D. Simultaneous analysis of 16S, 28S, COI and morphology in the Hymenoptera: Apocrita–evolutionary transitions among parasitic wasps. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2001, 74, 87–111. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1.
Sampling locations for Aleurocanthus woglumi and its parasitoids in the Hawaiian Islands (red circle). Sampling locations with GPS coordinates are shown in Table 2 and Table 3.
Figure 2.
(A) Citrus blackflies, Alerocanthus woglumi (arrow showing unparasitized pupa and egg spirals); (B) orange spiny whiteflies, A. spiniferus, and their parasitoid assembly established in Hawaii. The pupal stage of the orange spiny whitefly with the white wax fringe that surrounds its margins is twice as large as the orange spiny whitefly; (C) Encaria perplexa, male and female, introduced from Guatemala in 1998; (D) Amitus hesperidum, introduced from Guatemala in 1998; (E) Citrus blackfly parasitized pupae, arrows showing parasitoid′s circular exit holes. The oval-shaped pupa is black and convex and has dark dorsal spines. The marginal wax tubes produce a cottony fringe on the pupal margin; (F) Encarsia nipponica adventive; (G) Encarsia smithi, introduced from Japan in 1975 and established on Oahu.
Figure 2.
(A) Citrus blackflies, Alerocanthus woglumi (arrow showing unparasitized pupa and egg spirals); (B) orange spiny whiteflies, A. spiniferus, and their parasitoid assembly established in Hawaii. The pupal stage of the orange spiny whitefly with the white wax fringe that surrounds its margins is twice as large as the orange spiny whitefly; (C) Encaria perplexa, male and female, introduced from Guatemala in 1998; (D) Amitus hesperidum, introduced from Guatemala in 1998; (E) Citrus blackfly parasitized pupae, arrows showing parasitoid′s circular exit holes. The oval-shaped pupa is black and convex and has dark dorsal spines. The marginal wax tubes produce a cottony fringe on the pupal margin; (F) Encarsia nipponica adventive; (G) Encarsia smithi, introduced from Japan in 1975 and established on Oahu.
Table 1.
Hymenopterous parasitoid assembly of Aleurocanthus spiniferus and A. woglumi confirmed on the Hawaiian Islands, 1974–2002.
Table 1.
Hymenopterous parasitoid assembly of Aleurocanthus spiniferus and A. woglumi confirmed on the Hawaiian Islands, 1974–2002.
| Target Whitefly (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidiae) | Introduced and Adventive Natural Enemies | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family | Species | Origin of Introduction | Year of Introduction and Release Period | Colonization Records (Total Numbers Released Per Island) | Establishment Records | Release Records | |
| Aleurocanthus spiniferus (Quaintance), citrus orange spiny whitefly | Platygastridae | Amitus hesperidum Silvestri | Mexico | 1974 | Recorded on Oahu | Only Oahu Island | |
| Platygastridae | Amitus spiniferus (Brethes) | California | 1979–1982 | Oahu (200) | Introduced for Aleurothrixus floccosus (Maskell). Established on Oahu Island. | Only on Oahu Island in 1982. | |
| Aphelinidae | Cales noacki Howard | California | February 1981–August 1982 | Lanai (275) Molokai (300) Oahu (12,149) | Introduced for Aleurothrixus floccosus (Maskell) Hawaii 1992 Kauai 1997 Oahu 1982 | Hawaii 1992 Lanai 1982 Molokai 1982 Oahu 1982 | |
| Aphelinidae | Encarsia clypealis (Silvestri) | Texas | 1975 | No recovery | Only on Oahu Island. | ||
| Aphelinidae | Encarsia perplexa Huang and Polaszek | Texas | 1975 | Oahu (165) | No recovery | Only on Oahu, released as Encarsia opulenta (Silvestri). | |
| Aphelinidae | Encarsia smithi (Silvestri) | Japan (Nagasaki) and Guam | September 1974 | Oahu (5330) | Established on Oahu September 1975, reported 1981, 1984, 1999 on Oahu. | Only on Oahu Island, some of the colonies from Guam in 1984 record (25 adults). | |
| Aleurocanthus woglumi Ashby, citrus blackfly | Platygastridae | Amitus hesperidum Silvestri | Guatemala | Introduced 1998, released May 1999 –August 2000 | Hawaii (20), Kauai (112), Maui (82), Oahu (8595) | Established | Hawaii, Kauai, Maui, Molokai, Oahu Islands |
| Aphelinidae | Cales noacki Howard | California | February 1981–August 1982 | Molokai (300) Oahu (12,149) | Introduced for Aleurothrixus floccosus (Maskell) | Only on Oahu Island in 1982. Recorded established on Oahu Island. | |
| Aphelinidae | Encarsia perplexa Huang and Polaszek | Guatemala | Introduced 1998, released April 1999–June 2002 | Hawaii (49,190) Kauai (17,090) Maui (47,025) Molokai (27,165) Oahu (5740) | Established | Hawaii, Kauai, Maui, Molokai, Oahu Islands. First identified as Encarsia opulenta (Silvestri) | |
| Aphelinidae | Encarsia nipponica Silvestri | Adventive, native to Japan and China | - | - | Hawaii 2000, Kauai 2001 Oahu 1997, 1999 | Fortuitous species | |
| Aphelinidae | Encarsia smithi (Silvestri) | Japan (Nagasaki) and Guam | September 1974 | Reported on Oahu 1989, 1999 on citrus | Established on Oahu September 1975 Reported in 1999 on Oahu | Only on Oahu Island. | |
Table 2.
Infestation rates and parasitization of A. woglumi infesting Citrus species on Oahu Island during September–November 2022. a residential house, roadside, highway service area, farmland, research station, community garden, cemetery, park, and church.
Table 2.
Infestation rates and parasitization of A. woglumi infesting Citrus species on Oahu Island during September–November 2022. a residential house, roadside, highway service area, farmland, research station, community garden, cemetery, park, and church.
| Survey Area and Habitat a | Citrus Plant | Coordinate and Elevation | Date | Total Number of Leaves Collected | Total Number of Nymphs | Level of Infestation | % Parasitism |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Hawaii at Manoa | Sour orange | 21°18′17.98″ N 157°48′51.87″ W, 40 m | 26 September 2022 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| University of Hawaii at Manoa | Sweet lime | 21°18′15.16″ N 157°48′48.99″ W, 38 m | “ | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Ala Wai Community Garden | Lime | 21°17′02.50″ N 157°49′37.15″ W, 1.5 m | “ | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Waimanalo Research Station | Citron, | 21°20′07.91″ N 157°42′55.01″ W, 23 m | “ | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Kapaakea Lane, Honolulu | Tangerine | 21°17′27.82″ N 157°49′25.95″ W, 4 m | “ | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Kapaakea Lane, Honolulu | Pummelo | 21°17′25.55″ N 157°49′26.61″ W, 3.6 m | “ | 9 | 118 | 1.44 ± 0.49 | 17.8% |
| Pearl City Urban Botanical Garden | Sweet orange | 21°23′38.76″ N 157°58′38.08″ W, 8.5 m | 27 September 2022 | 71 | 1471 | 1.76 ± 0.78 | 56.6% |
| Diamond Head Community Garden | Tangelo | 21°16′02.09″ N 157°58′59.55″ W, 0.9 m | “ | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Moanalua Gardens | Grapefruit | 21°20′52.68″ N 157°53′28.74″ W, 6.4 m | “ | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| North Shore. Poamoho Research Station | Sweet orange | 21°32′38.00″ N 158°05′16.28″ W, 189 m | 28 September 2022 | 345 | 11,981 | 2.17 ± 0.95 | 19.7% |
| Salt Lake Blvd | Sweet lime | 21°21′09.13″ N 157°55′30.36″ W, 29 m | “ | 75 | 158 | 1.37 ± 0.48 | 53.8% |
| North Shore, Hawaii Queen bees, Hinshaw Farms | Sour orange | 21°32′11.10″ N 158°05′16.82″ W, 226 m | “ | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| North Shore, Hawaii Queen bees, Hinshaw Farms | Lemon | 21°32′17.54″ N 158°05′14.90″ W, 225 m | “ | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Hawaii Agriculture Research Center, Kunia | Tangelo | 21°23′09.02″ N 158°02′14.67″ W, 82.6 m | 2 October 2022 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Hawaii Agriculture Research Center 2 | Lemon | 21°23′07.28″ N 158°02′17.16″ W, 84.4 m | “ | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Manoa valley community gardens | Citron | 21°18′53.77″ N 157°48′25.49″ W, 57 m | “ | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Nuuanu Mauna ala Royal mausoleum | Pummelo | 21°19′30.33″ N 157°50′49.81″ W, 64 m | 26 October 2022 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Nuuanu old Pali drive | Lemon | 21°21′14.24″ N 157°48′37.68″ W, 308 m | “ | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Tantalus lookout | Tangerine | 21°19′06.92″ N 157°49′48.23″ W, 277 m | “ | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Kailua | Lemon | 21°23′47.09″ N 157°44′44.49″ W, 0.6 m | “ | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Mahiole street, Moanaloa | Sour orange | 21°20′49.79″ N 157°53′21.81″ W, 11 m | 31 October 2022 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| North Shore Poamoho Research Station | Sweet orange and sweet lime | 21°32′38.00″ N 158°05′16.28″ W, 189 m | “ | 573 | 23,168 | 2.34 ± 0.81 | 24.9% |
| Waikele | Tangerine | 21°24′03.18″ N 158°00′13.75″ W, 60.6 m | 1 November 2022 | 13 | 389 | 2.00 ± 1.03 | 34.4% |
| Aloun farm | Pummelo | 21°22′28.47″ N 158°02′42.94″ W, 56.7 m | “ | 14 | 212 | 1.78 ± 0.67 | 11.5% |
| Royal Mausoleum of Hawaii | Lime | 21°19′30.33″ N 157°50′49.81″ W, 64 m | “ | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Table 3.
Infestation rates and parasitization of A. woglumi infesting Citrus species on Hawaii Island during October 2022. a residential house, roadside, highway service area, farmland, research station, community garden, cemetery, park, and church.
Table 3.
Infestation rates and parasitization of A. woglumi infesting Citrus species on Hawaii Island during October 2022. a residential house, roadside, highway service area, farmland, research station, community garden, cemetery, park, and church.
| Survey Area and Habitat a | Citrus Plant | GPS and Elevation | Date | Total Number of Leaves Collected | Total Number of Nymphs | Level of Infestation | % Parasitism |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waiakea | Sweet orange | 19°38′30.98″ N 155°04′51.67″ W, 194 m | 27 October 2022 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Waiakea Research station | Lime | 19°38′41.46″ N 155°04′37.82″ W, 173 m | “ | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Hawaii Department of Agriculture, Hilo | Lemon | 19°42′23.03″ N 155°04′26.25″ W, 11 m | “ | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Kurtistown 1 | Pummelo | 19°35′35.98″ N 155°03′30.41″ W, 206 m | “ | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Kurtistown 2 | Pummelo | 19°35′30.36″ N 155°03′29.91″ W, 199 m | “ | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Kurtistown 3 | Sweet orange | 19°35′00.29″ N 155°03′36.53″ W, 242 m | “ | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Kurtistown 4 | Sour orange | 19°34′38.83″ N 155°03′56.19″ W, 271 m | “ | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Hawaiian Paradise Park 1 | Grapefruit | 19°36′12.88″ N 154°56′51.46″ W, 13 m | 28 October 2022 | 173 | 17,848 | 3.14 ± 0.76 | 2.7% |
| Hawaiian Paradise Park 2 | Pummelo | 19°36′12.88″ N 154°56′51.46″ W, 13 m | “ | 7 | 423 | 3.00 ± 0.50 | 0.0% |
| Hawaiian Paradise Park 3 | Pummelo | 19°34′17.70″ N 154°57′21.50″ W, 50 m | “ | 6 | 212 | 2.50 ± 0.80 | 28.3% |
| Hawaiian Paradise Park 4 | Sweet orange | 19°34′35.47″ N 154°57′18.39″ W, 9 m | “ | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Hawaiian Paradise Park 5 | Citron | 19°34′52.95″ N 154°57′39.69″ W, 39 m | 29 October 2022 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Hawaiian Paradise Park 6 | Lime | 19°34′14.46″ N 154°57′45.16″ W, 40 m | 30 October 2022 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Hawaiian Paradise Park 7 | Lemon | 19°35′39.96″ N 154°57′21.77″ W, 28 m | 31 October 2022 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Keeau 1 | Sour orange | 19°37′06.79″ N 155°02′37.40″ W, 121 m | 29 October 2022 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Keeau 2 | Lemon | 19°36′52.38″ N 155°02′48.90″ W, 149 m | “ | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Keeau 3 | Tangerine | 19°36′23.02″ N 155°02′59.69″ W, 177 m | “ | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Keeau 4 | Sweet orange | 19°37′11.96″ N 155°02′32.56″ W, 117 m | “ | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Keeau 5 | Pummelo | 19°37′42.04″ N 155°02′19.12″ W, 123 m | “ | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Keeau 6 | Tangelo | 19°38′42.04″ N 155°02′32.56″ W, 79 m | “ | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Ainaloa 1 | Tangerine | 19°31′40.76″ N 154°59′35.89″ W, 217 m | “ | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Ainaloa 2 | Lime | 19°31′20.12″ N 155°00′05.43″ W, 226 m | “ | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Ainaloa 3 | Lemon | 19°31′47.83″ N 154°59′49.05″ W, 201 m | “ | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Giakoumaki, M.-V.; Milonas, P.; Antonatos, S.; Evangelοu, V.; Partsinevelos, G.; Papachristos, D.; Ramadan, M.M. A Survey in Hawaii for Parasitoids of Citrus Whiteflies (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), for Introduction into Greece. Insects 2023, 14, 858. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14110858
AMA Style
Giakoumaki M-V, Milonas P, Antonatos S, Evangelοu V, Partsinevelos G, Papachristos D, Ramadan MM. A Survey in Hawaii for Parasitoids of Citrus Whiteflies (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), for Introduction into Greece. Insects. 2023; 14(11):858. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14110858
Chicago/Turabian StyleGiakoumaki, Maria-Vasiliki, Panagiotis Milonas, Spyridon Antonatos, Vasiliki Evangelοu, George Partsinevelos, Dimitrios Papachristos, and Mohsen M. Ramadan. 2023. "A Survey in Hawaii for Parasitoids of Citrus Whiteflies (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), for Introduction into Greece" Insects 14, no. 11: 858. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14110858
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
