Next Article in Journal
The Influence of Temperature and Host Gender on Bacterial Communities in the Asian Citrus Psyllid
Previous Article in Journal
A New Genus and Species of Lophocateridae from Mid-Cretaceous Amber of Myanmar (Coleoptera)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 12
Issue 12
10.3390/insects12121053
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Impact of Ultraviolet-B Radiation on the Sugar Contents and Protective Enzymes in Acyrthosiphon pisum

by
Chunchun Li
1,
Weining Yuan
1,
Yuping Gou
1,
Kexin Zhang
1,
Qiangyan Zhang
1,
Jing-Jiang Zhou
1,2 and
Changzhong Liu
1,*
1
Biocontrol Engineering Laboratory of Crop Diseases and Pests of Gansu Province, College of Plant Protection, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide and Agricultural Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, Guizhou University, Huaxi District, Guiyang 550025, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2021, 12(12), 1053; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12121053
Submission received: 19 October 2021 / Revised: 20 November 2021 / Accepted: 23 November 2021 / Published: 25 November 2021
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The decrease of stratospheric ozone contributes to a significant increase in solar ultraviolet (UV-B) radiation. This effect has led to investigation on the impact of increased UV-B radiation on insect physiology. Pea aphid is a worldwide important agricultural pest and is difficult to control due to its small size, high fecundity, and non-sexual reproduction. As such, there is a need for study of the effects of UV-B radiation on aphid physiology, to raise awareness of the mechanisms of aphid responses to UV-B stress. The results reported here revealed that UV-B radiation can lead to an increase in sugar contents in both red and green morphs of this aphid species, and confirmed the effects of UV-B radiation on aphid physiology by means of influencing protective enzyme activity.

Abstract

Natural and anthropogenic changes have been altering many environmental factors. These include the amount of solar radiation reaching the Earth’s surface. However, the effects of solar radiation on insect physiology have received little attention. As a pest for agriculture and horticulture, aphids are one of the most difficult pest groups to control due to their small size, high fecundity, and non-sexual reproduction. Study of the effects of UV-B radiation on aphid physiology may provide alternative control strategies in pest management. In this study, we examined the effects of UV-B radiation on protein and sugar contents, as well as the activities of protective enzymes, of the red and green morphs of the pea aphid over eight generations. The results indicated a significant interaction between UV-B radiation and aphid generations. Exposure of the pea aphids to UV-B radiation caused a significant decrease in the protein content and a significant increase in the glycogen and trehalose contents at each generation as measured in whole aphid bioassays. The enzyme activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and catalase (CAT) of the pea aphids changed significantly at each generation with UV-B treatments. The SOD activity increased over eight generations to the highest level at G7 generation. However, the enzyme activity of CAT first increased and then decreased with UV-B treatments, and POD mostly gradually decreased over the eight generations. Therefore, UV-B radiation is an environmental factor that could result in physiological changes of the pea aphid. Moreover, our study discovered that red and green aphids did not display a significant consistent difference in the response to the UV-B treatments. These results may prove useful in future studies especially for assessing their significance in the adaptation and management against UV-B radiation.

1. Introduction

The decrease of stratospheric ozone makes solar ultraviolet (UV-B) radiation increase significantly [1], and has great and sometimes adverse effects on the carbon and nitrogen cycle of the whole biosphere [2], living habitat [3], biological characteristics [4], physiology, and biochemistry [5], and this is likely to affect aphids.
In recent years, the destruction of the stratospheric ozone layer in the Earth’s atmosphere by the emission of anthropogenically generated pollutants [6,7] has greatly increased interest in the effects of solar ultraviolet radiation, especially ultraviolet-B (UV-B) radiation, which is considerably more harmful to living organisms than UV-A because of its shorter wavelength and consequently higher energy levels [8]. UV-B has a wide range of effects on the growth, biochemistry, physiology, and population structure of organisms. There is a consensus that gradual UV-B radiation intensity can result in serious climate change, including increase in global temperature, imbalances in natural ecosystems, and risks for the survival of living organisms [7]. An increasing body of evidence suggests that UV irradiation is one of the most ubiquitous environmental hazards affecting every organism [9]. It is considered to be an environmental factor that induces oxidative damages to organisms through the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and causes damage to DNA, membrane lipids, and proteins [10,11,12,13,14]. UV-B radiation has been reported to affect the metabolic rates of both Aedes albopictus and Culex pipiens, whose survival rate were also significantly lower in full-sun compared to shade and no UV-B conditions [5]. However, information about oxidative stress induced by UV irradiation in insects is scarce, including for aphids, and relatively few studies have examined the responses of protective enzymes in insects under UV irradiation.
The protective enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and catalase (CAT) are an important component of innate insect immunity. The main functions of these enzymes are to clear the free radicals from the body, and protect insects against the damage caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS) or other peroxide free radicals [15]. In addition, the activity of protective enzymes is often used as a measure of insect physiological state [16]. Under normal physiological conditions, these enzymes, and free radicals are maintained in a state of equilibrium in insects. However, when insects are exposed to UV-B [17,18], heat stress [19], insecticides [20,21], pathogens [22,23], the levels of the enzymes and free radical changes, and the protective enzymes are activated to decompose and metabolize free radicals, to maintain normal physiological activities in the body [24]. It has been reported that UV light irradiation induced superoxide radical and intensified the activity of protein oxidation processes in Helicoverpa armigera adults [17], and raised the activities of protective enzymes in its body to resist the damage of the radicals in the aphid Sitobion avenae [25].
The pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris), is a soft-bodied hemimetabolous insect that is distributed globally. Furthermore, A. pisum has red and green body colour polymorphisms. The green pea aphid is widely distributed all over the world and has been reported since 1776 [26], while the red pea aphid was first reported by Harrington in 1945 [27]. Laboratory crosses between red and green morphs indicates that the body colour assay of pea aphids is genetically determined, and its morphs remain distinct between generations because the aphids reproduce parthenogenetically [28,29]. However, some environmental factors (e.g., symbiotic microorganisms) are also considered to affect aphid body colour [30].
A. pisum lives year-round under direct sunlight and is not capable of escaping from UV-B [5,31]. The aphids voraciously suck fluid from plants and secret honeydew, causing the leaves of plants to mould, wither, and even die, therefore reducing crop yields [32]. They can also transmit 25 types of viruses by sap-feeding, causing enormous production losses of cash crops [33]. In recent years, because of the influence of many factors (e.g., UV radiation), the pea aphid population has become one of the dominant pests in alfalfa (Medicago sativa), and the importance of the red pea aphid has gradually increased in China [34]. This has enhanced the research on the pea aphids [35,36,37,38], and on the effects of UV-B treatment on biological characteristics of aphids. Yuan et al., [39,40] showed that ultraviolet radiation inhibited the growth and reproduction of pea aphids, and the effect of this inhibition was proportional to the radiation intensity and time. Moreover, with prolonged exposure to UV-B radiation over time, the average body length of red pea aphids was shortened, and the average weight reduced [40].
In the current study, we aimed to elucidate the effect of UV-B treatment on the sugar contents and protective enzyme activity in the red and green morphs of the pea aphid over eight generations. We compared the effect of UV-B treatments on the contents of protein, glycogen and trehalose, and the activity of SOD, POD, and CAT in the red and green morphs. This study helps to inform approaches for further study of the defense mechanism of the pea aphids to environmental changes and support the development of new approaches for pest management.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Insect Culture

The initial population of the pea aphids Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris used in this study was established from a single parthenogenetic female collected from an alfalfa field in Gansu Province, China, and maintained in Biocontrol Engineering Laboratory of Crop Diseases and Pests. The pea aphids were reared on the fava bean plant (Vicia faba L.) leaves in the laboratory for eight generations. Briefly, leaves of fava bean were placed on a Petri dish (9 cm in diameter) with a piece of moist absorbent cotton around the petioles and the back side of the leaf facing up. The red and green aphids sourced from these leaves were then separately introduced into the additional Petri dishes with bean leaves and reared separately in two incubators at 25 ± 1 °C, 70% relative humidity and a photoperiod of 16L: 8D. Adult pea aphids that molted within 12 h from 4th instar aphids were used for tests.

2.2. Mode of UV-B Treatment

A UV-B lamp (Hebei Zhonglian Qitong Information Technology Co., Ltd., ZW40D17W, Hebei, China) was used as the source of artificial UV-B radiation. The nymphs (<12 h) produced by the adult aphids were fed on bean leaves for 12 h and then treated at 4 W/m2 intensity of UV-B radiation for 20 min, 30 min, 40 min, and 50 min. The distance between the aphids and the UV-B lamp was 30 cm. The aphids treated under an incandescent lamp at 4 W/m2 intensity (New Light Source Lighting Technology Co., Ltd., ST58, Haining, China) were served as control. The UV-B treatment and the control treatment were performed with 20 either red or green aphid morphs in a Petri dish with leaves for each exposure duration. The aphids were irradiated once a day for the specific exposure duration until the adult stage (about 6 days). All treatments were repeated 3 times.
After 6-day exposure, five red aphids and five green adult aphids were collected as G0 treated aphids from each dish and stored at −80 °C for the following experiments. Then the newly emerged (<12 h) nymphs from the remaining adult aphids were transferred to new Petri dishes with fresh leaves and used for next run of the UV-B treatments. This test procedure was repeated 8 times, and produced aphids were used to the treatment for 8-generation (G0–G7). A total of 2400 nymphs (20 nymphs × 5 treatments × 3 replicates × 8 generations) was used in this experiment.

2.3. Determination of Trehalose and Glycogen Content

The measurements of trehalose and glycogen contents in the red and green aphid morphs were determined mainly following the method used by Handel & Day [41]. Five adult aphids from each generation stored at −80 °C were rinsed with sterile distilled water and placed on filter paper to absorb the moisture on the surface of the aphids. After the aphids were weighed, they were put together in a 1.5 mL centrifuge tube containing 50 μL of 10% trichloroacetic acid. The aphids were then ground with a grinding stick in the centrifuge tube. A total of 350 μL of 10% trichloroacetic acid solution was used to wash the grinding stick twice and added into the centrifuge tube. The aphid homogenate was then centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 5 min at 20 °C. The supernatant was transferred to a new 1.5 mL centrifuge tube, and the precipitate was discarded. Then, 800 μL of absolute ethanol was added to the supernatant, mixed and incubated at 4 °C overnight (about 16–17 h). Next day, the mixture was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 20 min. The resulting supernatant was transferred to a 1.5 mL centrifuge tube and used as the trehalose assay solution. The white precipitate was dissolved in 1000 μL of sterile distilled water and transferred to another 1.5 mL centrifuge tube as glycogen assay solution.
200 μL of the trehalose assay solution was mixed with 1000 μL of 0.15 N H2SO4 solution and heated in a boiling water bath for 10 min. After the mixture was cooled down, 1000 μL of 30% KOH was added. Then the mixture was boiled in a water bath for 10 min, and kept at room temperature for 20 min. The resulting solution (200 μL) was added to the microplate. The trehalose content and glycogen content were determined by measuring the absorbance value of the samples at 620 nm and 630 nm, respectively, with the spectrophotometer (Koromee Scientific Instruments Co., Ltd., UV-6100, Shanghai, China). The trehalose and glycogen contents were calculated from the absorbance value using D-glucose as standard. Each UV-B treatment was repeated three times.

2.4. Preparation of Enzyme Solution

The red and green adult aphids from each generation were collected as described above. The aphids (n = 5 for each colour morph) were weighed and together placed in a pre-cooled test tube, and then 1 mL of 50 mmol/L phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.8) was added to create a suspension. The suspension was ground using a glass homogenizer in an ice bath, homogenized by ultrasonic disruption for 10 min, and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm at 4 °C for 10 min. The supernatant was collected, stored at −80 °C and used as the enzyme solutions to measure the total amount of protein and the activity of protective enzymes.

2.5. Protein Content Determination

Protein content in red and green aphids were determined according to Lowry et al. methods [42]. Seven different concentrations (0, 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.10, and 0.12 mg/mL) of the bovine serum albumin (BSA) (99.5%, Hubei Jiufenglong Chemical Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China), were used to construct the standard curve. About 50 μL of the enzyme solution was transferred into a well of 96-well microplate and addition of 200 μL Coomassie brilliant blue G-250 to each well. The protein concentration was quantified spectrophotometrically at 595 nm. The protein contents were calculated based on the standard curve of BSA. Each UV-B treatment for each morph and each generation was repeated three times.

2.6. Protective Enzyme Activities of Pea Aphids

The superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was determined according to Beauchamp & Fridovich methods [43]. We mixed 125 μL of the reaction fluid with 5 μL of the enzyme solution and 50 μL of 13 mmol/L riboflavin. The 5 μL enzyme solution was replaced with 5 μL of 50 mM PBS in the control groups. After 15 min exposure to light at 4000 Lx and 25 °C, the solution was immediately protected from light and the absorbance at OD560 of the solution was determined immediately. The measurement was measured 3 times. The SOD enzyme activity was then measured as the OD560 value and calculated using the amount of enzyme required for 50% inhibition as an enzyme activity unit (U). Enzyme activity was expressed as the change in the OD560 value per unit of time and unit of protein.
The catalase (CAT) activity was determined according to Chance & Maehly methods [44]. In short, 100 μL of H2O2 (8%) solution mixed with to 190 μL of 50 mM PBS (pH 7.8). Then, 10 μL of the enzyme solution was added to the mixture. The OD240 was measured immediately at 25 °C every 1 min for 3 min. In the control group, the PBS buffer was used instead of the enzyme solution. The experiment was repeated 3 times. The amount of enzyme that reduces OD240 by 0.1 unit in 1 min is expressed as 1 unit of CAT activity.
The peroxidase (POD) activity was determined according to Shan et al. [45]. The sample mixture contained 235 μL of 50 mM PBS buffer (pH 7.8), 20 μL guaiacol and 15 μL of the enzyme solution. Subsequently, 15 μL of 26 mM H2O2 was quickly added. The samples were placed at room temperature for 5 min, and the colorimetry was measured at a wavelength of 470 nm every 1 min for 10 min. The reactions were measured 3 times. The POD activity was expressed as an increase of 0.01 of A470 per minute. The control consisted of the PBS buffer instead of enzyme solution.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Data were expressed as a mean ± standard deviation (S.D.) for the 3 replicates for the 2 colour morphs, 8 generations, and 4 treatment times. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 23.0 (Chicago, IL, USA), with UV-B treatment, and generation included as factors. The general linear model (GML) procedure of the Statistical Analysis System (SAS) (https://www.sas.com/en_us/home.html; accessed on 29 July 2021) was used to analyze the means when a significant interaction between generations and UV-B treatments. One-way ANOVA was conducted to examine the effects of UV-B radiation treatment and generation on the test parameters (protective enzyme activity, sugar and protein contents) followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test. In addition, these test parameters were compared between G0 and G7 on red and green morphs, respectively. Differences between the means were tested for significance at the 0.05 significance level.

3. Results

3.1. Interaction between UV-B Treatment and Generation

There was a statistically significant interaction between the UV-B treatment and growth generation on the glycogen content, the protein content, the SOD activity, and the CAT activity of both aphid colour morphs (p < 0.001) (Table 1). The interaction of the two factors (generation and UV-B treatment) was not significant only in the green aphids for the trehalose content (F = 1.48, df = 28, p > 0.05) and in the red aphids for the POD activity (F = 0.54, df = 28, p > 0.05). Therefore, we used one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test to separately compare the effect of UV-B treatment at G0–G7 generation and the effect of growth generation under different UV-B treatment.

3.2. Effects of UV-B Treatments on the Trehalose Content of Aphids

Overall, the trehalose content increased with the duration of the UV-B treatments (20–50 min) for each generation (G0–G7), and it peaked with the 50 min UV-B treatment at G7 generation (Figure 1A,B). During earlier generations (G0–G3) the trehalose content of the UV-B treated red aphids dropped with increasing generation, the lowest trehalose content was seen at G3 generation. Then, the trehalose content began to increase with the generation under most UV-B treatments (Figure 1A and Figure S1A). At G7 generation, the trehalose content was significantly higher in the 30 min–50 min treated red aphids than in untreated control aphids and increased significantly from 1.55 ± 0.05 μg/mg in the 30 min treated aphids to 1.65 ± 0.08 μg/mg and 1.95 ± 0.04 μg/mg in the 40 min and 50 min treated aphids, respectively, 1.74–2.19 times higher than that of the control aphids (Figure 1A). Like in the red aphids, the trehalose content in the UV-B treated green aphids was also highest in the 50 min treated aphids for each generation. However, unlike the U-shape response in the treated red aphids, the shape of the trehalose content is indeterminate over generations in the treated green aphids (Figure 1B and Figure S1B). There was no significant difference in the trehalose contents between the 20 min UV-B treated and untreated control aphids, but in the 30 min–50 min UV-B treated aphids, the change of trehalose content was significant, and the content was higher compared to that of untreated aphids (Figure S1A,B).

3.3. Effects of UV-B Treatments on the Glycogen Content of Aphids

For the red colour morph, Figure 2A reveals that the glycogen content increased as the UV-B treatment duration increased from 20 min to 50 min in each generation and was significantly higher than that of untreated aphids after G4 generation (Figure 2A). Moreover, the glycogen content in untreated aphid was relatively stable over generations, whereas it increased from G0 to G7 generation at each UV-B treatment in the UV-B treated aphids (Figure S2A). At G7 generation, the glycogen content had increased significantly by the UV-B treatment and ranged from 2.50 ± 0.13 μg/mg for the 20 min treatment to 3.39 ± 0.06 μg/mg for the 50 min treatment, which was 1.80–2.44 times higher than those of the untreated aphids (Figure 2A).
Figure 2B shows that the effect of UV-B treatments on the glycogen content in the green pea aphids. Like the red aphids after UV-B treatments, the glycogen content in the treated green aphids increased with the prolonged UV-B treatments at each generation and increased as the generation progressed at same UV-B treatment (Figure 2B and Figure S2B). The glycogen content at G7 generation was the highest under each UV-B treatment, which was 1.47–2.06 times higher that of the untreated control aphids (Figure 2B).

3.4. Effects of UV-B Treatments on the Protein Content of Aphids

The protein content of the red and green aphids before and after UV-B treatments is shown in Figure 3. It ranged from 23.75 ± 0.29 μg/mg to 46.28 ± 0.11 μg/mg in the red aphids, and 27.09 ± 0.24 μg/mg to 45.02 ± 0.28 μg/mg in the green aphids (Figure 3A,B). In both aphids, the protein content first increased, then decreased under the UV-B treatments in G0 to G4 generation (also Table S1). The highest protein content occurred in the 20 min treatment at G3 generation for both aphids. After G3 generation it gradually decreased with increasing generation with the lowest protein level recorded with UV-B treatment duration of the 50 min treatment at G7 generation. Compared with those of untreated aphids, the protein content was significantly reduced by 8.77–33.69% in the treated red aphids, and 12.56–25.70% in the treated green aphids at G6 and G7 generation. However, without the UV-B treatments (control), the protein content remained stable over generations in both aphids.

3.5. Effects of UV-B Treatment on SOD Activity of Aphids

Figure 4A shows the effect of UV-B treatments on the SOD activity of the red aphids. The SOD activity at G0, G1 and G2 generation was not significantly affected by the 20–40 min UV-B treatments and was significantly higher after G5 generation compared to those of the control aphids. It was significantly increased by the 50 min UV-B treatment compared to that of the control aphids at each generation (Figure 4A). The SOD activity was highest at G7 generation over the generations and increased as the UV-B treatment duration increased from 17.16 ± 0.41 μg/mg by the 20 min treatment to 24.75 ± 0.69 μg/mg by the 50 min treatment, which are 3.61 and 5.20 times higher than those of the control aphids (Figure 4A).
Similarly, the SOD activity at each generation of the green aphids increased with the UV-B treatment duration and over generations (Figure 4B and Figure S3B). At the G7 generation it increased by 2.73–3.28% from that of the control aphids to 17.39 ± 0.69 μg/mg, 16.98 ± 0.31 μg/mg, 18.11 ± 0.77 μg/mg and 19.47 ± 0.68 μg/mg under the UV-B treatments for 20 min, 30 min, 40 min, and 50 min, respectively.

3.6. Effects of UV-B Treatment on the POD Activity of Aphids

Unlike the activity of other enzymes, the POD activity was reduced by the UV-B treatments (Figure 4C,D). It was significantly lower than that of untreated aphids after G5 generation under the 30 min and 50 min treatments in the red aphids (Figure 4C) and in the green aphids (Figure 4D). At G7 generation, the POD activity of the red and green aphids was reduced by 22.93% and 43.07% than that of the control aphids by 50 min UV-B treatment, respectively. Moreover, the POD activity of the red aphids was not significantly changed by the 20–50 min UV-B treatments even at G7 generation, whereas the POD activity of the green aphids was significantly decreased from 8.60 ± 0.23 μg/mg·min to 4.85 ± 0.27 μg/mg·min after G3 generation by the UV-B treatments (Figure 4D and Figure S3C,D).

3.7. Effects of UV-B Treatment on the CAT Activity of Aphids

The CAT activity in both untreated red and green aphids remained unchanged over the generations (Figure 4E,F). However, the UV-B treatments resulted in an increase of the CAT activity between G0 to G2 generations in both colour morphs in a time-dependent fashion with the highest activity in the treated aphids treated for 50 min (Figure 4E,F). After G3 generation of the red aphids and G4 generation of the green aphids, the CAT activity decreased under the UV-B treatments. However, it was not reduced below the level of the untreated aphids at G3–G6 generation. At G6 and G7 generation of the green aphids, the CAT activity was still on average higher by 32.01%, and 21.31% in the 20 min to 50 min treated aphids than that of the control, respectively (Figure 4F). Only by the 50 min treatment at G7 generation was the CAT activity of the red aphid reduced below that of the untreated aphids, but they did not differ significantly (Figure 4E).

3.8. Comparison of UV-B Treatments on Sugar and the Enzyme Activity at G0 and G7 Generations

Figure 5 summarizes the effects of the UV-B treatments on the contents of total protein, glycogen and trehalose, and the activity of CAT, SOD, and POD at G0 and G7 generations. There was no significant difference in all measured parameters in the untreated aphids at G0 and G7 generations (Figure 5). The UV-B treatments caused an increase in the trehalose content, the glycogen content, the SOD activity, and the CAT activity, and a decrease in the protein content and the POD activity. The 20 min UV-B treatment caused a significant change in the glycogen content, total protein content, and the SOD activity between G0 and G7 generations (Figure 5B–D). However, the trehalose content, the POD activity, and the CAT activity between G0 and G7 generations were not changed significantly by the 20 min treatment (Figure 5A,E,F). In fact, the trehalose content between the generations was not significantly affected even under the 50 min treatment for both red and green aphids (Figure 5A). As the UV-B treatment duration increased, the total protein content and the POD activity decreased, while the glycogen content and the SOD activity significantly increased (Figure 5B,D).
At G7 generation, the protein content of the red aphid was lower than that of the green aphid under the 30 min to 50 min UV-B treatments, suggesting that the UV-B treatments may have a relatively greater impact on the protein content of the red pea aphids (Figure 5C). On the other hand, the UV-B treatments had a greater effect on the POD activity in the green aphids than in the red aphids (Figure 5E).

4. Discussion

The current study reports the long-term effects and possible mechanisms of UV-B on the protective enzyme activity and nutritional dynamics of the red and green morphs of pea aphids over eight generations.
Energy storage in arthropods has significant implications for survival and reproduction [46]. The primary energy sources are carbohydrates and proteins [47,48]. This study reveals a significant increase in the glycogen content after the UV-B treatments over eight generations (Figure 2) consistent with the response of insects to low temperature treatment [49,50]. The increase in glycogen content could be an adaptation mechanism of insects to adversity. In other research on A. pisum, the elevated CO2 levels also initiated aphid emergency responses by increasing glucose metabolism [51]. A similar trend was observed in the trehalose content of UV-B treated aphids (Figure 1), participating in the body’s energy supply as an energy substance as in diapausing pupae of the silkmoth, Philosamia cynthia [52]. Trehalose is a non-reducing sugar and the principal sugar circulating in the haemolymph of most insects. It also protects insects from the deleterious effects of osmotic, anoxic and other environmental treatments [53,54,55]. These results suggest that UV-B radiation is a negative environmental factor for A. pisum.
Our results revealed that the protein contents in the UV-B treated aphids were significantly lower than in control aphids between G0 and G3 generation, which is consistent with Ahsaei et al., who showed that the reproduction ability of the pea aphid was closely correlated with the protein contents in its body [56]. It is possible that more immune response-related proteins and enzymes were produced under the UV-B radiation. The protein content of insects is for development, maintenance, morphogenesis and reproduction, and cell osmotic pressure [57,58]. Based on previous research, protein supplements enhanced Bactrocera minax survival, mating, and fecundity [59]. More interesting, proteins may even be of more importance for aphids as there are three generations present within one viviparous female [60]. As the aphids grew, the long-term UV-B radiation resulted in the inhibition of protein synthesis and protein transportation, the protein content continuously declined from G4 to G7 generation (Figure 3 and Table S1). These results confirmed that a long period of UV-B treatment led to inhibitory effects on the development and population growth of the pea aphid [39,40].
The green aphid morphs accumulated higher protein than the red aphid morphs under the long-term UV-B radiation (Figure 3), which is in consistent with previous research that the green aphids produced more offspring than the red aphids [61] and that the green morph is considered to be batter adapted to cold conditions than red aphids, because they occur earlier in the vegetative season [62]. However, red aphids are more abundant than the green aphids during warmer months [63,64]. The red A. pisum aphids were more sensitive and showed a higher increase in the glycogen contents under the UV-B treatments (Figure 5B). They accumulated significantly more glycogen and trehalose than the green aphids as reported previously [61]. Proteins account for 42.14% of total energy reserves in the green aphids and 22.06% in the red aphids [56]. The mechanism for these physiological differences between the red and green aphids is not clear. An increase of energy reserve contents in A. pisum body led to their increased mobility [56]. Interestingly, winged aphids have a lower reproductive potential than apterous individuals [65]. It may be possible that the red pea aphids are more active than the green aphids in terms of dispersal both by walking and flying away from UV-B radiation.
We then further investigated the effects of UV-B treatment on the activities of three protective enzymes in the pea aphid and revealed that the activity of all the assayed protective enzyme was affected in the UV-B treated aphids compared to those in untreated aphids (Figure 4). These enzymes (SOD, POD and CAT), which can effectively inhibit the active oxygen species from damaging and play an important role in maintaining normal functions of living organisms [66]. These three enzymes contribute to keeping cellular free radicals at a normal level, thus abating the damage of free radicals and raising the resistance of in living organisms to exogenous substances [67,68,69,70]. The effect of the UV-B treatment on the SOD activity increased with generation, but only after G5 generation was the SOD activity significantly increased by all UV-B treatments and reached a maximum level at 50 min treatment (Supplementary Figure S3A). The UV-B radiation first increased and then decreased the activities of POD in A. pisum, and these decreases were greater with increasing UV-B treatment time (Figure 4C,D), consistent with the finding on Sitobion avenae. [25]. The short-term UV-B treatments promoted the CAT activity of both red and green aphid morphs (Figure 4E,F), probably as a response to overcome UV-B-induced oxidative impacts. However, the CAT activity then declined with increasing generation. After the G4 generation, the CAT activity was lower than in the control under 50 min treatments (Supplementary Figure S3E,F). Interestingly, we found that the CAT activity was higher in the green aphids than in the red aphids, but at G7 generation, the activity of SOD and POD was higher in the red aphids than in the green aphids after the UV-B treatments (Figure 5), which may be why the red aphids are more adaptable to UV-B radiation and the fecundity is still lower in the red aphids than in the green aphids.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we demonstrated that UV-B radiation can lead to increase sugar contents in both red and green morphs of A. pisum, and confirmed the effects of UV-B radiation on the aphid physiology by means of regulating the protective enzyme activity. More interestingly, our study discovered the differences between the red and green aphids in response of UV-B radiations. Moreover, the sugar content, and protective enzymes (SOD and POD) activity of the red pea aphid are greater than those of the green pea aphid in long-term UV-B radiation, indicating the red aphid may be more adaptable to ultraviolet radiation.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects12121053/s1, Table S1: Average content (μg/mg) of total protein, Figure S1: Effects of UV-B radiation on trehalose content of Acyrthosiphon pisum for eight (G0–G7) generations, Figure S2: Effects of UV-B radiation on glycogen content of Acyrthosiphon pisum for eight (G0–G7) generations, Figure S3: Effects of UV-B radiation on the protect enzyme activity of Acyrthosiphon pisum at each of eight generations(G0–G7).

Author Contributions

Author Contributions: Project conceptualisation and management: C.L. (Chunchun Li), W.Y. and C.L. (Changzhong Liu) Method-ology and sampling: C.L. (Chunchun Li), W.Y., Y.G., K.Z. and Q.Z. Data analysis: C.L. (Chunchun Li), W.Y., J.-J.Z. and C.L. (Changzhong Liu) Visualisation and validation: K.Z., Q.Z., J.-J.Z. and C.L. (Changzhong Liu) Writing and reviewing the manuscript: C.L. (Chunchun Li), W.Y., Y.G., K.Z., Q.Z., J.-J.Z. and C.L. (Changzhong Liu) All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science Foundation of China (No. 31960351, 31260433, 31960227). Gansu Province excellent graduate “Innovation Star” project of China (2021CXZX-379) to C.L. Program of Introducing Talents to Chinese Universities (111 Program no. D20023) to J.-J.Z.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the contributions made by Wang Lixiang, Li Yan in experimental data analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

  1. Madronich, S.; McKenzie, R.L.; Caldwell, M.M.; Bjorn, L.O.; Li, W. The changes of surface ultraviolet radiation. AMBIO J. Hum. Environ. 1995, 24, 143–152. [Google Scholar]
  2. Long, C.S.; Miller, A.J.; Lee, H.T.; Wild, J.D.; Przywarty, R.C.; Hufford, D. Ultraviolet index forecasts issued by the National Weather Service. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 1996, 77, 729–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Potter, K.A.; Woods, H.A. Immobile and tough versus mobile and weak: Effects of ultraviolet B radiation on eggs and larvae of Manduca sexta. Physiol. Entomol. 2013, 38, 246–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Osakabe, M. Biological impact of ultraviolet-B radiation on spider mites and its application in integrated pest management. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2021, 56, 139–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Villena, O.C.; Momen, B.; Sullivan, J.; Leisnham, P.T. Effects of ultraviolet radiation on metabolic rate and fitness of Aedes albopictus and Culex pipiens mosquitoes. PeerJ 2018, 6, e6133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Crutzen, P.J. Ultraviolet on the increase. Nature 1992, 356, 104–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Madronich, S.; McKenzie, R.L.; Bjorn, L.O.; Caldwell, M.M. Changes in biologically active ultraviolet radiation reaching the Earth’s surface. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 1998, 46, 5–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Andrady, A.L.; Hamid, H.S.; Hu, X.; Torikai, A. Effects of increased solar ultraviolet radiation on materials. J. Photochem. Photobiol. 1998, 46, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rebollar, E.; Valadez-Graham, V.; Vázquez, M.; Reynaud, E.; Zurita, M. Role of the p53 homologue from Drosophila melanogaster in the maintenance of histone H3 acetylation and response to UV-light irradiation. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580, 642–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Pitzschke, A.; Forzani, C.; Hirt, H. Reactive oxygen species signaling in plants. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2006, 8, 1757–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jenkins, G.I. Signal transduction in responses to UV-B radiation. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2009, 60, 407–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 909–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tuncbilek, A.S.; Ercan, F.S.; Canpolat, U. Effect of ionizing (gamma) and non-ionizing (UV) radiation on the development of Trichogramma euproctidis (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Arch. Biol. Sci. 2012, 64, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lidon, F.C.; Teixeira, M.; Ramalho, J.C. Decay of the chloroplast pool of ascorbate switches on the oxidative burst in UV-B-irradiated rice. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2012, 198, 130–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zeni-Graiff, M.; Rios, A.C.; Maurya, P.K.; Rizzo, L.B.; Sethi, S.; Yamagata, A.S.; Mansur, R.B.; Pan, P.M.; Asevedo, E.; Cunha, G.R.; et al. Peripheral levels of superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase in youths in ultra-high risk for psychosis: A pilot study. CNS Spectr. 2019, 24, 333–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lozinskaya, Y.L.; Slepneva, I.A.; Khramtsov, V.V.; Glupov, V.V. Changes of the antioxidant status and system of generation of free radicals in hemolymph of Galleria mellonella larvae at microsporidiosis. J. Evol. Biochem. Physiol. 2004, 40, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Meng, J.Y.; Zhang, C.Y.; Zhu, F.; Wang, X.P.; Lei, C.L. Ultraviolet light-induced oxidative stress: Effects on antioxidant response of Helicoverpa armigera adults. J. Insect Physiol. 2009, 55, 588–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kumar, J.; Ghosh, P.; Kumar, A. Ultraviolet-B radiation stress-induced toxicity and alterations in proteome of Deinococcus radiodurans. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 2020, 31, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lu, F.P.; Chen, Q.; Chen, Z.S.; Lu, H.; Xu, X.L.; Jing, F.L. Effects of heat stress on development, reproduction and activities of protective enzymes in Mononychellus mcgregori. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2014, 63, 267–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Qin, D.Q.; Liu, B.J.; Zhang, P.W.; Zheng, Q.; Luo, P.R.; Ye, C.Y.; Zhao, W.H.; Zhang, Z.X. Treating green pea aphids, Myzus persicae, with azadirachtin affects the predatory ability and protective enzyme activity of harlequin ladybirds, Harmonia axyridis. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 212, 111984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Huang, A.L.; Meng, L.Y.; Zhang, W.; Liu, J.Y.; Li, G.Y.; Tan, H.H.; Lu, W.; Zheng, X.L. Effects of five pesticides on toxicity, detoxifying and protective enzymes in Phauda flammans Walker (Lepidoptera: Zygaenidae). Pak. J. Zool. 2019, 51, 1457–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ding, J.N.; Zhang, H.H.; Chi, D.F. Effects of a pathogenic Beauveria bassiana (Hypocreales: Cordycipitaceae) strain on detoxifying and protective enzyme activities in Xylotrechus rusticus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) larvae. Fla. Entomol. 2015, 98, 1148–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dubovskiy, I.M.; Martemyanov, V.V.; Vorontsova, Y.L.; Rantala, M.J.; Gryzanova, E.V.; Glupov, V.V. Effect of bacterial infection on antioxidant activity and lipid peroxidation in the midgut of Galleria mellonella L. larvae (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C: Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2008, 148, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kayser, H.; Palivan, C.G. Stable free radicals in insect cuticles: Electron spin resonance spectroscopy reveals differences between melanization and sclerotization. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2006, 453, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhou, D.; Du, Y.M.; Yang, J.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, H.Y.; Hu, Z.Q.; Hu, X.S. Effects of UV-B radiation in successive generations on the activities of protective enzymes in the grain aphid, Sitobion avenae (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Acta Entomol. Sin. 2014, 57, 762–768. [Google Scholar]
  26. Bournoville, R. Insectes ravageurs des legumineuses. In Ennemiset Maladies des Prairies; Raynal, G., Gondran, J., Bournoville, R., Courtillot, M., Eds.; Editions Quae: Versailles, France, 1989; pp. 179–195. [Google Scholar]
  27. Harrington, C.D. Biological races of the pea aphid. J. Econ. Entomol. 1945, 38, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Losey, J.E.; Ives, A.R.; Harmon, J.; Browm, C.; Ballantyne, F. A polymorphism maintained by opposite patterns of parasitism and predation. Nature 1997, 388, 269–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Caillaud, M.C.; Losey, J.E. Genetics of color polymorphism in the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. J. Insect Sci. 2010, 10, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Tsuchida, T.; Koga, R.; Horikawa, M.; Tsunoda, T.; Maoka, T.; Matsumoto, S.; Simon, J.C.; Fukatsu, T. Symbiotic bacterium modifies aphid body color. Science 2010, 330, 1102–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sang, W.; Yu, L.; He, L.; Ma, W.H.; Zhu, Z.H.; Zhu, F.; Wang, X.P.; Lei, C.L. UVB radiation delays Tribolium castaneum metamorphosis by influencing ecdysteroid metabolism. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0151831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Ryalls, J.M.W.; Riegler, M.; Moore, B.D.; Johnson, S.N. Biology and trophic interactions of lucerne aphids. Agric. For. Entomol. 2013, 15, 335–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Makkouk, K. Viruses and virus diseases of pea, lentil, faba bean and chickpea. World Crops: Cool Seas. Food Legum. 1988, 5, 591–615. [Google Scholar]
  34. Du, J.L.; Wu, D.G.; Zhang, T.W.; Qian, X.J.; Liu, C.Z. Effect of UV-B for different radiation durations on biological characteristics of two color morphs of pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) offspring. Acta Agresti. Sin. 2012, 20, 961–966. [Google Scholar]
  35. Lv, N.; Wang, L.; Sang, W.; Liu, C.Z.; Qiu, B.L. Effects of endosymbiont disruption on the nutritional dynamics of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum. Insects 2018, 9, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Barberà, M.; Rubén, C.C.; David, M.T. Insulin-like peptides in volved in photoperiodism in the aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2019, 112, 103185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, G.; Guo, Y.P.; Guo, S.F.; Zhou, J.J.; Liu, C.Z. RNA interference of trehalose-6-phosphate synthase and trehalase genes regulates chitin metabolism in two color morphs of Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wang, G.; Zhou, J.J.; Li, Y.; Guo, Y.P.; Quandahor, P.; Liu, C.Z. Trehalose and glucose levels regulate feeding behavior of the phloem-feeding insect, the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 15864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yuan, W.N.; Lv, N.; Sun, X.L.; Liu, C.Z. Effects of continuous UV-B stress on biological characteristics of green pea aphid. Chin. J. Eco-Agric. 2015, 23, 1020–1025. [Google Scholar]
  40. Yuan, W.N.; Zhu, Y.Y.; Sun, X.L.; Yang, Q.Y.; Liu, C.Z. Effects of UV-B stress on biological characteristics of red pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris. Plant Prot. 2016, 42, 77–82. [Google Scholar]
  41. Handel, V.E.; Day, J.F. Assay of lipids, glycogen and sugars in individual mosquitoes: Correlations with wing length in field-collected Aedes vexans. J. Am. Mosq. Control. Assoc. 1988, 4, 549–550. [Google Scholar]
  42. Lowry, B.O.H.; Rosebroug, N.J.; Farr, A.L.; Randdall, R.J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 1951, 193, 256–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Beauchamp, C.; Fridovich, I. Superoxide dismutase: Improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Anal. Biochem. 1971, 44, 276–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chance, P.; Maehly, A.C. Assay of catalases and peroxidases. Meth. Enzymol. 1955, 11, 764–775. [Google Scholar]
  45. Shan, W.; Li, Y.L.; Zhu, J.J.; Liang, Y.H.; Wang, Z.M. Effect of different sulfur fumigation dosages on activity of browning enzymes and chemical constituents of Chrysanthemum morifolium cv. Boju. Chin. Med. J. 2019, 44, 4852–4856. [Google Scholar]
  46. Lease, H.M.; Wolf, B.O. Lipid content of terrestrial arthropods in relation to body size, phylogeny, ontogeny and sex. Physiol. Entomol. 2011, 36, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Beenakkers, A.M.T.; Van der Horst, D.J.; Van Marrewijk, W.J.A. Insect lipids and lipoproteins, and their role in physiological processes. Prog. Lipid Res. 1985, 24, 19–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. O’Brien, D.M. Fuel use in flight and its dependence on nectar feeding in the hawkmoth Amphion floridensis. J. Exp. Biol. 1999, 202, 441–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Tsonev, L.I.; Tihova, M.G.; Brain, A.P.R.; Yu, Z.W.; Quinn, P.J. The effect of the cryoprotective sugar trehalose on the phase behaviour of mixed dispersions of dioleoyl derivatives of phosphatidylethanolamine and phosphatidylcholine. Liq. Cryst. 1994, 17, 717–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Womersley, C.Z.; Higa, L.M. Trehalose: Its role in the anhydrobiotic survival of Ditylenchus myceliophagus. Nematologica 1998, 44, 269–292. [Google Scholar]
  51. Li, C.C.; Sun, Q.; Gou, Y.P.; Zhang, K.X.; Zhang, Q.Y.; Zhou, J.J.; Liu, C.Z. Long-term effect of elevated CO2 on the development and nutrition contents of the Pea Aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum). Front. Physiol. 2021, 12, 827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hawakawa, Y.; Chino, H. Temperature-dependent activation or inactivation of glycogen phosphorylase and synthase of fat body of the silkworm Philosamia cynthia: The possible mechanism of the temperature-dependent interconversion between glycogen and trehalose. Insect Biochem. 1982, 12, 361–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Storey, K.B.; Storey, J.M. Freeze tolerance in animals. Physiol. Rev. 1988, 68, 27–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Uritani, M.; Takai, M.; Yoshinaga, K. Protective effect of disaccharides on restriction endonucleases during drying under vacuum. J. Biochem. 1995, 117, 774–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Crowe, J.H.; Crowe, L.M.; Oliver, A.E.; Tsvetkova, N.; Wolkers, W.; Tablin, F. The trehalose myth revisited: Introduction to a symposium on stabilization of cells in the dry state. Cryobiology 2001, 43, 89–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ahsaei, S.M.; Tabadkani, S.M.; Hosseininaveh, V.; Allahyari, H.; Bigham, M. Differential accumulation of energy by the colour morphs of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Hemiptera: Aphididae) mirrors their ecological adaptations. Eur. J. Entomol. 2013, 110, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Wang, D.; Xuan, J.P.; Guo, H.L.; Liu, J.X. Seasonal changes of freezing tolerance and its relationship to the contents of carbohydrates, proline, and soluble protein of Zoysia. Acta Prataculturae Sin. 2011, 20, 98–107. [Google Scholar]
  58. Moeini, P.; Tahmasebi, A. Maize Iranian mosaic virus infection promotes the energy sources of its insect vector, Laodelphax striatellus. J. Appl. Entomol. 2018, 143, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, F.L.; Chambi, C.; Li, Z.Y.; Huang, C.; Ma, Y.K.; Li, C.R.; Tian, X.H.; Sangija, F.; Ntambo, M.S.; Kankonda, O.M.; et al. Influence of supplemental protein on the life expectancy and reproduction of the Chinese Citrus Fruit Fly, Bactrocera minax (Enderlein) (Tetradacus minax) (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Insect Sci. 2018, 18, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Stevens, N.M. A study of the germ cells of Aphis rosae and Aphis oenotherae. J. Exp. Zool. 1905, 2, 313–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Markkula, M. Studies on the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum, with special reference to the differences in the biology of the green and red forms. Ann. Agric. Fenn. 1963, 2, 1–30. [Google Scholar]
  62. Valmalette, J.C.; Dombrovsky, A.; Brat, P.; Mertz, C.; Capovilla, M.; Robichon, A. Light-induced electron transfer and ATP synthesis in a carotene synthesizing insect. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Weisser, W.W.; Braendle, C. Body color and genetic variation in winged morph production in the pea aphid. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2001, 99, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Jin, J.; Wang, S.S.; He, C.G. Genetic diversities of Acyrthosiphon pisum (harris) (pink form) populations from different geographic regions in the northwest of China. Acta Agrestia Sin. 2013, 21, 406–412. [Google Scholar]
  65. Raikhel, A.S.; Dhadialla, T.S. Accumulation of yolk proteins in insect oocytes. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1992, 37, 217–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wei, H.; Zhikuan, J.; Qingfang, H. Effects of herbivore stress by Aphis medicaginis Koch on the malondialdehyde contents and the activities of protective enzymes in different alfalfa varieties. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2007, 27, 2177–2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Orr, W.C.; Sohal, R.S. Extension of life span by overexpression of superoxide dismutase and catalase in Drosophila melanogaster. Science 1994, 263, 1128–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Orr, W.C.; Sohal, R.S. Does overexpression of Cu, Zn-SOD extend life span in Drosophila melanogaster? Exp. Gerontol. 2003, 38, 227–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sohal, R.S.; Agarwal, A.; Agarwal, S.; Orr, W.C. Simultaneous overexpression of copper- and Zinc-containing superoxide dismutase and catalase retards age-related oxidative damage and increases metabolic potential in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 15671–15674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Bruce, R.J.; West, C.A. Elicitation of lignin biosynthesis and isoperoxidase activity by pectic fragnents in suspension cultures caster bean. Plant Physiol. 1989, 91, 889–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Insects 12 01053 g001 550
Figure 1. Effects of UV-B radiation on the trehalose content of A. pisum at each generation(G0–G7). Different lowercase letters between UV-B radiation are statistically different at a same generation in red (A) and green (B) A. pisum (p < 0.05, Tukey-HSD test).
Figure 1. Effects of UV-B radiation on the trehalose content of A. pisum at each generation(G0–G7). Different lowercase letters between UV-B radiation are statistically different at a same generation in red (A) and green (B) A. pisum (p < 0.05, Tukey-HSD test).
Insects 12 01053 g001
Insects 12 01053 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of UV-B radiation on the glycogen content of A. pisum at each generation (G0–G7). Different lowercase letters between UV-B radiation are statistically different at a same generation in red (A) and green (B) A. pisum (p < 0.05, Tukey-HSD test).
Figure 2. Effects of UV-B radiation on the glycogen content of A. pisum at each generation (G0–G7). Different lowercase letters between UV-B radiation are statistically different at a same generation in red (A) and green (B) A. pisum (p < 0.05, Tukey-HSD test).
Insects 12 01053 g002
Insects 12 01053 g003 550
Figure 3. Effects of UV-B radiation on the protein content of A. pisum at each generation (G0–G7). Different lowercase letters between UV-B radiation are statistically different at a same generation in red (A) and green (B) A. pisum (p < 0.05, Tukey-HSD test).
Figure 3. Effects of UV-B radiation on the protein content of A. pisum at each generation (G0–G7). Different lowercase letters between UV-B radiation are statistically different at a same generation in red (A) and green (B) A. pisum (p < 0.05, Tukey-HSD test).
Insects 12 01053 g003
Insects 12 01053 g004 550
Figure 4. Effects of UV-B radiation on the protect enzyme activity of A. pisum at each generation (G0–G7). (A,B): Superoxide dismutase (SOD); (C,D): Peroxidase (POD); (E,F): Catalase (CAT). Different lowercase letters between UV-B radiation are statistically different at a same generation in red (A,C,E) and green (B,D,F) A. pisum (p < 0.05, Tukey-HSD test).
Figure 4. Effects of UV-B radiation on the protect enzyme activity of A. pisum at each generation (G0–G7). (A,B): Superoxide dismutase (SOD); (C,D): Peroxidase (POD); (E,F): Catalase (CAT). Different lowercase letters between UV-B radiation are statistically different at a same generation in red (A,C,E) and green (B,D,F) A. pisum (p < 0.05, Tukey-HSD test).
Insects 12 01053 g004
Insects 12 01053 g005 550
Figure 5. Comparison of UV-B treatment on sugar contents and the activity of protective enzymes of red (R) and green (G) pea aphids at G0 and G7 generations. (A): Trehalose content; (B): Glycogen content; (C): Protein content; (D): Superoxide dismutase (SOD); (E): Peroxidase (POD); (F): Catalase (CAT).
Figure 5. Comparison of UV-B treatment on sugar contents and the activity of protective enzymes of red (R) and green (G) pea aphids at G0 and G7 generations. (A): Trehalose content; (B): Glycogen content; (C): Protein content; (D): Superoxide dismutase (SOD); (E): Peroxidase (POD); (F): Catalase (CAT).
Insects 12 01053 g005
Table
Table 1. Summary of analysis of two factors ANOVA results for effects of UV-B and generation interaction on the sugar contents and protective enzymes in A. pisum.
Table 1. Summary of analysis of two factors ANOVA results for effects of UV-B and generation interaction on the sugar contents and protective enzymes in A. pisum.
MeasurementMorphType III Sum of SquaresDfMean SquareF-Valuep-Value
TrehaloseRed1.61280.062.85<0.001
Green0.80280.031.480.089
GlycogenRed4.62280.173.89<0.001
Green2.66280.104.88<0.001
ProteinRed489.782817.4912.09<0.001
Green352.132812.5812.91<0.001
SODRed701.472825.0554.56<0.001
Green300.342810.7331.71<0.001
PODRed3.28280.120.540.966
Green20.08280.721.780.024
CATRed36.92281.324.90<0.001
Green27.46280.982.88<0.001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, C.; Yuan, W.; Gou, Y.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, Q.; Zhou, J.-J.; Liu, C. The Impact of Ultraviolet-B Radiation on the Sugar Contents and Protective Enzymes in Acyrthosiphon pisum. Insects 2021, 12, 1053. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12121053

AMA Style

Li C, Yuan W, Gou Y, Zhang K, Zhang Q, Zhou J-J, Liu C. The Impact of Ultraviolet-B Radiation on the Sugar Contents and Protective Enzymes in Acyrthosiphon pisum. Insects. 2021; 12(12):1053. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12121053

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Chunchun, Weining Yuan, Yuping Gou, Kexin Zhang, Qiangyan Zhang, Jing-Jiang Zhou, and Changzhong Liu. 2021. "The Impact of Ultraviolet-B Radiation on the Sugar Contents and Protective Enzymes in Acyrthosiphon pisum" Insects 12, no. 12: 1053. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12121053

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop