Next Article in Journal
Agri-Food Side-Stream Inclusions in the Diet of Alphitobius diaperinus Part 1: Impact on Larvae Growth Performance Parameters
Previous Article in Journal
Plant Abandonment by Busseola fusca (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Larvae: Do Bt Toxins Have an Effect?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 11
Issue 2
10.3390/insects11020078
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Endophytic Isolates of Cordyceps fumosorosea to Enhance the Growth of Solanum melongena and Reduce the Survival of Whitefly (Bemisia tabaci)

by
Tingfei Sun
1,2,
Zhang Shen
3,
Mobeen Shaukat
1,2,
Cailian Du
1,2 and
Shaukat Ali
1,2,*
1
Key Laboratory of Bio-Pesticide Innovation and Application, Guangzhou 510642, China
2
Engineering Research Center of Biological Control, Ministry of Education and Guangdong Province, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
3
Shaoyang Tobacco Company, Shaoyang 422100, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2020, 11(2), 78; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11020078
Submission received: 22 November 2019 / Revised: 7 January 2020 / Accepted: 17 January 2020 / Published: 22 January 2020
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study reports the effects of seed treatment with Cordyceps fumosorosea on seed germination, growth, colonization of eggplant (Solanum melongena), and growth of Bemisia tabaci (feeding on fungal colonized eggplant leaves). Germination rates of eggplant seeds were similar among different treatments. The growth parameters such as root length, shoot length, and number of leaves) differed significantly after 15, 30, and 60 days of seed treatment. The total dry weight of eggplant in response to treatment with C. fumosorosea isolates increased significantly when compared with the control. Both isolates of C. fumosorosea colonized different plant tissues, although the extent of colonization decreased during the experimental period. The colonization of eggplants by both C. fumosorosea isolates resulted in a significant reduction of B. tabaci incidence. This study possibly provides the first report of increased plant growth and increased insect mortality in eggplants inoculated with C. fumosorosea isolates.

1. Introduction

The development of sustainable strategies to improve crop protection is a major challenge facing agricultural scientists [1]. The use of entomopathogens for pest control can provide an environmentally friendly alternative to chemical pesticides [2]. Several species of entomopathogenic fungi are being used or developed as biopesticides against different insect pests [3]. Entomopathogenic fungi are normally applied in spray formulations as pest control agents for a short period of time [4]. Recent advances in research have shown that entomopathogenic fungi can play a role in plant–microbial symbioses by which they can protect plants against different insects and diseases [5]. Furthermore, there is growing evidence that entomopathogenic fungi enhance plant growth by improved nutrient uptake, hormone production, and tolerance to different abiotic as well as biotic stresses [2,6]. These entomopathogenic fungal endophytes are classified as non-clavicipitaceous because they are usually transmitted horizontally [7]. Different species of fungi are known to enhance plant growth as well reduce insect pest growth when colonized into plants [2,8,9,10]. For example, B. bassiana acted as an endophyte to wheat seedlings by increasing plant spike production and effectively controlling Spodoptera litura larvae [2].
Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae), also known as sweet potato whitefly, is a major crop pest worldwide [11]. Furthermore, B. tabaci acts as a vector of around 150 plant viruses [12]. In China, MEAM1 B. tabaci is well distributed across 31 provinces or municipalities where it causes huge economic crop losses [13]. Bemisia tabaci is considered to be one of the most destructive pests of eggplant [14]. Islam et al. [15] showed that B. tabaci infestation caused reduction in the leaf area (26.6%), leaf fresh weight (21.8%), and leaf dry weight (19.27%) of eggplant when compared to non-infested plants. Their study also reported a 9.7% reduction in chloprophyll content and a 65.9% reduction in the rate of photosynthesis in response to whitefly infestation when compared with the control. The management of whitefly is mainly carried out by using synthetic chemicals, which is causing harmful effects to our natural environment [16]. Therefore, efforts have been made to find an environmentally safer alternative to synthetic pesticides and the use of entomopathogenic fungi can be one of the potential alternatives [17]. The entomopathogenic fungus, Cordyceps fumosorosea Zare and Gams (Hyphomycetes) (formerly Isaria fumosorosea, designated as Cordyceps clade; Kepler et al. [18]), is a well known fungal species being used for whitefly management [19]. Strains of C. fumosorosea have also been proven to be pathogenic against various insect species in different regions of the world [20,21,22]. Huang et al. [21] studied the virulence of C. fumosorosea against B. tabaci. Their results indicate that strain PF01-N4 is virulent against B. tabaci, having a LC50 value of 2.16 × 106 and 1.10 × 104 conidiamL−1 after 6 and 12 days, respectively. Since the 1990s commercial preparations of C. fumosorosea have been used against whiteflies infesting different crops [23,24]. Cordyceps fumosorosea has received much attention because of its microbial potential, but this fungus can also show endophytic behavior [25]. To date, a few studies have been carried out to observe the endophytic behaviour of C. fumosorosea and its subsequent effects on plant growth as well as pest management. Therefore, this study was performed (a) to assess the effects of C. fumosorosea colonization on plant growth, and (b) to observe the influence of C. fumosorosea on the mortality of B. tabaci individuals feeding on eggplants.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Host Plant

Eggplant (Solanum melongena) was opted for this study due to its ability of adapting different climates, faster growth, and its dietary value. Seeds of eggplant variety, “Dafeng”, obtained from Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou, P.R. China were surface sterilized by following the method of Jaber and Enkerli [8]. Briefly, seeds were soaked in sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) solution (1%) for two minutes, followed by soaking in 70% ethanol for two minutes. The seeds were then rinsed thrice with sterile distilled water. The effectiveness of sterilization was confirmed through plating the sterilized seeds on potato dextrose agar (PDA) for 7 days in a biological incubator (26 ± 2 °C, 0:24 h L:D).

2.2. Fungal Inoculum

Cordyceps fumosorosea isolates SP502 and SP535 originally isolated from soil, obtained from the repository of the Key Laboratory of Biopesticides Innovation and Application of Guangdong Province, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, were used for the studies. The culturing, as well as basal concentration (1 × 107 conidia ml−1) preparation of both isolates, was performed by following the method of Ali et al. [26].

2.3. Effect of Fungal Inoculation on Germination of Seeds

Surface sterilized eggplant seeds (10 seeds) were soaked in fungal suspension (1 × 107 conidia ml−1 prepared in ddH2O having 0.1% Tween 80) of both isolates for 8 h. Seeds soaked in sterile ddH2O containing 0.1% Tween 80 served as control. The flasks containing seeds were placed in the dark at 25 ± 2 °C. After soaking, the seeds were moved to Petri dishes (9 cm ø) with moist filter paper. The filter paper was kept moist by the addition of sterile ddH2O at regular intervals. The Petri dishes were placed in the dark at 25 ± 2 °C. The whole experimental setup was repeated five times (n = 5) and a total of 50 seeds were used for each treatment. The number of germinated seeds was recorded on a daily basis.

2.4. Effect of Fungal Inoculation on Plant Growth

The effects of C. fumosorosea endophytic colonization on plant growth parameters were observed by planting the inoculated or control seeds (soaked in fungal suspension or distilled water, as described above) in disinfected pots. The planting substrate was prepared by following Jaber and Enkerli [8]. Seeds (2 seeds per pot) were sown for each treatment and ten pots were used per treatment. The whole experimental setup was repeated five times (n = 5). Potted plants were placed at 25 ± 2 °C, 60 ± 5% R.H, and 16 h L: 8 h D photoperiod. Plants were watered as needed throughout the experiment for 60 days. Five seedlings were carefully and randomly removed from the pots after 15, 30, and 60 days of fungal inoculation and roots were washed clean with tap water. Different plant parts (roots, shoots and leaves) were separated and the lengths of roots and shoots, as well as the number of leaves were measured. Different plant parts (roots, shoots and leaves) were then held at 70 °C until becoming constant dry weights.

2.5. Endophytic Colonization of Eggplants by C. fumosorosea.

The systemic colonization of eggplants by C. fumosorosea was observed by re-isolating the fungi from different plant parts at 30 days, 45, and 60 days post inoculation by following the method of Arnold et al. [27]. The plants used to observe the growth parameters were later used for re-isolation experiments. Plant roots, shoots, and leaves were separated, followed by surface sterilization with 0.5% NaOCl (for leaf and shoot tissues) or 1% NaOCl (for roots). The tissues were washed with 70% ethanol for 2 min, followed by three rinses of ddH2O. Plant materials were then air dried in laminar flow hood to remove the water droplets. Eight pieces of each of the different plant parts were prepared for inoculation on PDA plates by using the method described by Jaber and Enkerli [8]. Plates were placed at 25 ± 2 °C and fungal growth was recorded on a daily basis for 2 weeks. The whole experiment was repeated five times (n = 5). The colonization of different plant parts (%) by both C. fumosorosea isolates was calculated through the equation by Petrini and Fisher [28], as shown below;
P e r c e n t   c o l o n i z a t i o n = ( n u m b e r   o f   p l a n t   t i s s u e s   s h o w i n g   f u n g a l   g r o w t h T o t a l   n u m b e r   o f   p l a n t   t i s s u e s   p l a t e d ) × 100 %

2.6. Effect of C. fumosorosea Colonization on Growth of Bemisia tabaci

The Bemisia tabaci population, obtained from the stock cultures of Key Laboratory of Biopesticides Innovation and Application of Guangdong Province, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, was maintained on eggplants in cages placed under laboratory conditions at 25 ± 2 °C, 70 ± 5% R.H, and a photoperiod of 12 h L: 12 h D by following Ali et al. [29]. Newly emerged adults were directly collected from the cages and were used for the experiment.
Eggplants inoculated with both C. fumosorosea isolates or uninoculated plants were moved to bioassay cages (60 cm × 60 cm × 60 cm) by following Zhang et al. [30]. Micro-cages were attached to the under surface of eggplants inoculated with C. fumosorosea isolates 30 days post inoculation. Two pairs of whitefly adults (each pair consisting of one male and one female) were released in each cage for oviposition. The micro-cages were removed after 24 h and the number of eggs was adjusted to 10 eggs per leaf on 5 different leaves making up a total of 50 eggs per plant. In the control, eggs were inoculated on eggplant leaves without fungal inoculation. The whole experimental setup was repeated five times (n = 5). The leaves bearing eggs were monitored for the number of eggs hatched and the newly hatched B. tabaci immatures were circled for close monitoring by following Zhang et al. [31]. The survivorship of B. tabaci immature (nymphs and pupae) was recorded on a daily basis for 30 days and reduction in B. tabaci population was calculated by following Zhang et al. [31]. To survey the infective mortalities, cadavers were taken out and cultured separately at 25 ± 2 °C and >95% R.H. to stimulate sporulation. If conidia spores of C. fumosorosea were recovered from a cadaver, the cadaver was regarded as having died from infection by C. fumosorosea.

2.7. Data Analysis

The data regarding plant growth parameters, fungal colonization and reduction in whitefly population were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA-1) at a 5% level of significance. Treatment means were compared by Tukey’s HSD test. All the statistical analyses were performed using SAS ver 9.1 [32].

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Fungal Inoculation on Seed Germination

Germination of eggplant seeds soaked in conidial suspension of C. fumosorosea isolates and control were statistically similar to each other (F2,12 = 21.84; p = 0.056) (Figure 1).

3.2. Effect of Fungal Inoculation on Plant Growth Parameters

The plant growth parameters (root length, shoot length, number of fresh leaves, plant dry weight, root dry weight, shoot dry weight, and leaf dry weight) following the colonization of C. fumosorosea isolates showed significantly higher values after 30 (F2,12 =3 2.92; p < 0.01), 45 (F2,12 = 41.82; p < 0.01), and 60 days (F2,12 = 28.61; p < 0.01) of fungal treatment when compared to control (Figure 2 and Figure 3). The C. fumosorosea isolate SP535 proved to be a better inducer of plant growth when compared with C. fumosorosea isolate SP502 and control (Figure 2 and Figure 3). The root growth in response to C. fumosorosea SP535 treatment was 68%, 110%, and 147% higher than control after 30, 45, and 60 days of fungal treatment, respectively (Figure 2A). The shoot growth in response to C. fumosorosea SP535 treatment was 109%, 127%, and 103% higher than control after 30, 45, days and 60 days of fungal treatment, respectively (Figure 2B). The number of plant leaves in response to C. fumosorosea SP535 treatment were 100%, 125%, and 180% higher than control after 30, 45, and 60 days of fungal treatment, respectively (Figure 2C).
The C. fumosorosea SP535 treatment resulted in 118% higher plant dry weight compared with control, whereas plant dry weight in response to C. fumosorosea SP502 was 69% higher than the control (Figure 3D). Cordyceps fumosorosea SP535 treatment caused 166% higher root dry weight production compared with control, whereas root dry weight in response to C. fumosoroseaSP502 was 104% higher than control (Figure 3A). Cordyceps fumosorosea SP535 treatment resulted in 59% higher shoot dry weight compared with control, whereas shoot dry weight in response to C. fumosoroseaSP502 was 31% higher than control (Figure 3B). Cordyceps fumosoroseaSP535 treatment resulted in 116% higher leaf dry weight compared with control, whereas leaf dry weight in response to C. fumosorosea SP502 was 71% higher than control (Figure 3C).

3.3. Endophytic colonization of eggplant by C. fumosorosea.

The effect of fungal inoculation on percent colonization (%) of different plant regions (root, stem and leaf) by C. fumosorosea after 30 (F2,12 = 18.54; p < 0.01), 45 (F2,12 = 22.39; p < 0.01), and 60 days (F2,12 = 31.82; p < 0.01) of inoculation has been shown in Figure 4. The fungal colonization of eggplant roots varied significantly between both C. fumosorosea isolates after 30, 45, and 60 days of fungal treatment. Cordyceps fumosorosea SP535 treatment resulted in 58%, 51%, and 52% colonization of roots after 30, 45, and 60 days of fungal treatment, respectively whereas 43%, 39%, 38% of plant roots were colonized after 30, 45, and 60 days of treatment with C. fumosorosea SP502 (Figure 4A).
The fungal colonization of eggplant shoots varied significantly between different C. fumosorosea isolates and control after 30, 45, and 60 days of fungal treatment. Cordyceps fumosoroseaSP535 treatment resulted in 52%, 50%, and 49% colonization of shoots after 30, 45, and 60 days of fungal treatment, respectively, whereas 40%, 38%, and 37% of plant shoots were colonized after 30, 45, and 60 days of treatment with C. fumosorosea SP502 (Figure 4B).
The fungal colonization of eggplant leaves at different time intervals varied significantly among different C. fumosorosea isolates and control after 30, 45, and 60 days of fungal treatment. Cordyceps fumosorosea SP535 treatment resulted in 58%, 57%, and 56% colonization of leaves after 15, 30, and 60 days of fungal treatment, respectively, whereas 41%, 40%, and 40% of plant leaves were colonized after 30, 45, and 60 days of treatment with C. fumosorosea SP502 (Figure 4C).

3.4. Effect of C. fumosorosea Colonization on Growth of B. tabaci

The colonization of eggplants by both C. fumosorosea isolates significantly affected the egg hatchability (%) of B. tabaci when compared with control after 15 and 30 days of insect inoculation (Table 1). The egg hatchabilty (%) of B. tabaci in response to plant colonization by C. fumosorosea isolate SP535 at the end of experimental period was 73.10 ± 2.64%, whereas the percent hatchability of B. tabaci eggs following the colonization of C. fumosorosea isolate SP502 was 80.34 ± 3.56% (Table 1).
The colonization of eggplants by both C. fumosorosea isolates caused significantly different mortalities of B. tabaci pupa when compared with control after 15 days and 30 days of insect inoculation (Table 2). The percent pupal mortality in response to plant colonization by C. fumosorosea isolate SP535 at the end of experimental period was 33.19 ± 2.64%, whereas the percent pupal mortality following the colonization of C. fumosorosea isolate SP502 was 28.40 ± 3.56% (Table 2).
The colonization of eggplants by both C. fumosorosea isolates resulted in significant reduction of B. tabaci incidence when compared with control after 15 and 30 days of insect inoculation. The reduction in B. tabaci incidence in response to colonization by C. fumosorosea isolate SP535 was significantly higher than that observed for C. fumosorosea isolate SP502 (Figure 5).

4. Discussion

4.1. Effect of Fungal Inoculation on Plant Growth Parameters

Our results showed that plant growth and dry weight production was enhanced in response to seed treatment with C. fumosorosea (both isolates) when compared with control. These findings are consistent with the results of Jaber and Enkerli [8] who observed similar growth enhancement of broad bean when the seeds were treated with B. bassiana and M. brunneum. The variations among experimental replicates can be attributed to the number of biotic or abiotic factors. Our results are different from the findings of Akello et al. [33] who did not observe any change in the growth of banana plants treated with B. bassiana, whereas our results are at par with Gurulingappa et al. [34] and Lopez and Sword [35] who observed a significant increase in cotton and wheat growth in response to B. bassiana seed treatments. The above-mentioned inconsistencies of results can be related to the variations in the association of a particular fungal isolate with a plant species during the endophytic growth [10,36]. Our results are at par with Khan et al. [37] who observed a similar increase in plant dry weight of soybean in response to Metarhizium anisopliae treatment. The increase in plant dry weight can be explained by improvement in plant tolerance to herbivory and compensates for biomass lost due to insect attack [38,39].

4.2. Endophytic Colonization of Eggplant by C. fumosorosea

Overall both isolates of C. fumosorosea were found to endophytically colonize the root, stem, and leaves of eggplants. The extent or degree of fungal colonization was significantly similar during plant growth. Our results are similar to the findings of other researchers [8,36,40,41,42] who observed similar systemic plant colonization of endophytic fungi when fungi were applied as seed treatment. The decrease in percentage colonization with the passage of time may be caused by the responses of host plant to heterotrophic fungi, expansion of plant tissues with the maintenance of established colonies, or possible competition from other endophytes in the plant [43].

4.3. Effect of C. fumosorosea Colonization on Growth of B. tabaci

The colonization of eggplants by both isolates of C. fumosorosea caused a significant reduction in whitefly populations inoculated on plant leaves (after 15 and 30 days of whitefly inoculation) when compared with control. These results are similar to previous studies [2,33,34,44,45,46,47,48]. Based on the studies available to date, it has been well documented that endophytic entomopathogens can reduce the herbivore performance through production of secondary metabolites/compounds during the endophytic colonization of plants [49,50]. The reduction in insect populations on colonized plants can be related to the development stage of target pest or fungal species/strain being applied [47,51,52].

5. Conclusions

This study shows that seed treatment with C. fumosorosea solutions (two isolates) caused an increase in plant growth. C. fumosorosea isolate SP535 successfully colonized different plant parts and this colonization caused a reduction in whitefly populations on eggplant leaves. Our results provide basic information on enhanced plant growth and increased insect mortality in eggplants inoculated with two different isolates of C. fumosorosea in the absence of any imposed plant stress, which may be related to the possible production of secondary metabolites/compounds during the endophytic colonization of plants.

Author Contributions

S.A. designed the study T.S., Z.S., M.S. and D.C.L. performed the experiments and took pictures. C.D. did data curation and Investigation. S.A. analyzed data and wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript

Funding

This research was funded by grants from Key Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (2018B020205003), The Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, P.R. China (201807010019) and National Natural Science Foundation (31750110475).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Berg, G. Plant–microbe interactions promoting plant growth and health: Perspectives for controlled use of microorganisms in agriculture. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 84, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sanchez Rodriguez, A.R.; Raya Diaz, S.; Zamarreno, A.M.; Garcia-Mina, J.M.; Campilo, M.C.; Quesada Moraga, E. An endophytic Beauveria bassiana strain increases spike production in bread and durum wheat plants and effectively controls cotton leafworm (Spodoptera littoralis) larvae. Biol. Control 2017, 116, 90–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, X.S.; Xu, J.; Wang, X.M.; Qiu, B.L.; Cuthbertson, A.G.S.; Du, C.L.; Wu, J.H.; Ali, S. Isaria fumosorosea based zero-valent iron nanoparticles affect the growth and surival of sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius). Pest Mang. Sci. 2019, 75, 2174–2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Inglis, G.D.; Goettel, M.S.; Butt, T.M.; Strasser, H. Use of Hyphomycetous Fungi for Managing Insect Pests. Progress, Problems and Potential. In Fungi as Biocontrol Agents; Butt, T.M., Jackson, C.W., Magan, N., Eds.; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 2001; pp. 23–69. [Google Scholar]
  5. Jaber, L.R.; Ownley, B.H. Can we use entomopathogenic fungi as endophytes fordual biological control of insect pests and plant pathogens? Biol. Control 2017, 116, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sasan, R.K.; Bidochka, M.J. The insect-pathogenic fungus Metarhizium robertsii (Clavicipitaceae) is also an endophyte that stimulates plant root development. Am. J. Bot. 2012, 99, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Rodriguez, R.J.; White, J.F., Jr.; Arnold, A.E.; Redman, R.S. Fungal endophytes: Diversity and functional roles. New Phytol. 2009, 182, 314–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Jaber, L.R.; Enkerli, J. Fungal entomopathogens as endophytes: Can they promote plant growth? Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2017, 27, 28–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vega, F.E.; Goettel, M.S.; Blackwell, M.; Chandler, D.; Jackson, M.A.; Keller, S.; Koike, M.; Maniania, N.K.; Monzon, A.; Ownley, B.H.; et al. Fungal entomopathogens: new insights on their ecology. Fungal Ecol. 2009, 2, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Clifton, E.H.; Jaronski, S.T.; Coates, B.S.; Hodgson, E.W.; Gassmann, A.J. Effects of endophytic entomopathogenic fungi on soyabean aphid and identification of Metarhizium isolates from agricultural fields. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0194815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Naranjo, S.E.; Castle, S.J.; De Barro, P.J.; Liu, S.S. Population dynamics, demography, dispersal and spread of Bemisia tabaci. In Bemisia: Bionomics and Management of a Global Pest; Stansly, P.A., Naranjo, S., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 185–226. [Google Scholar]
  12. Stansly, P.A.; Naranjo, S.E. Bemisia: Bionomics and Management of a Global Pest; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands; New York, NY, USA, 2010; p. 528. [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu, Y.Q.; Liu, S.S. 2012. Species status of Bemisia tabaci complex and their distributions in China. J. Biosaf. 2010, 21, 247–255. [Google Scholar]
  14. Islam, M.T.; Qiu, B.L.; Ren, S.X. Host preference and influence of sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) on eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Acta Agric. Scandanivavica Sect. B Soil Plant Sci. 2010, 60, 320–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Islam, M.T.; Ren, S.X. Effect of sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) on eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) leaf. J. Pest Sci. 2009, 82, 211–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liang, P.; Tian, Y.A.; Biondi, A.; Desneux, N.; Gao, X.W. Shortterm and transgenerational effects of the neonicotinoid nitenpyram on susceptibility to insecticides in two whitefly species. Ecotoxicology 2012, 21, 1889–1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Cuthbertson, A.G.S.; Walters, K.F.A.; Northing, P. Susceptibility of Bemisia tabaci immature stages to the entomopathogenic fungus Lecanicillium muscarium on tomato and verbena foliage. Mycopathologia 2005, 159, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kepler, R.M.; Luangsa-ard, J.J.; Hywel-Jones, N.L.; Quandt, C.A.; Sung, G.H.; Rehner, S.A.; Aime, A.C.; Henkel, T.W.; Sanjuan, T.; Zare, R.; et al. A Phylogenetically-Based Nomencl. Cordcipitaceae (Hypocreales). Ima Fungus 2017, 8, 335–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ali, S.; Wu, J.H.; Huang, Z.; Ren, S.X. Production and regulation of extracellular chitinase from the entomopathogenic fungus Isaria fumosorosea. Biocontrol. Sci. Technol. 2010, 20, 723–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ali, S.; Huang, Z.; Ren, S.X. Production of cuticle degrading enzymes by Isaria fumosorosea and their evaluation as a biocontrol agent against diamondback moth. J. Pest Sci. 2010, 83, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Huang, Z.; Ali, S.; Ren, S.X.; Wu, J.H. The effect of Isaria fumosorosea on mortality and fecundity of Bemisia tabaci and Plutella xylostella. Insect Sci. 2010, 17, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pick, D.A.; Avery, P.B.; Hunter, W.B.; Powell, C.A.; Arthurs, S.P. Effect of Isaria fumosorosea (Hypocreales: Cordycipitaceae) and Lysiphlebus testaceipes, (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on the brown citrus aphid: Preliminary assessment of a compatibility study. Fla. Entomol. 2012, 95, 764–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Faria, M.; Wraight, S.P. Biological control of Bemisia tabaci with fungi. Crop Prot. 2001, 20, 767–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cuthbertson, A.G.S.; Blackburn, L.F.; Eyre, D.P.; Cannon, R.J.C.; Miller, J.; Northing, P. Bemisia tabaci: The current situation in the UK and the prospect of developing strategies for eradication using entomopathogens. Insect Sci. 2011, 18, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mantzoukas, S.; Chondrogiannis, C.; Grammatikopoulos, G. Effects of three endophytic entomopathogens on sweet sorghum and on the larvae of the stalk borer Sesamia nonagrioides. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2015, 154, 78–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ali, S.; Huang, Z.; Ren, S.X. Media composition influences on growth, enzyme activity and virulence of the entomopathogen hyphomycete Isaria fumosorosea. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2009, 131, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Arnold, A.E.; Maynard, Z.; Gilbert, G.S. Fungal endophytes in dicotyledonous neotropical trees: Patterns of abundance and diversity. Mycol. Res. 2001, 105, 1502–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Petrini, O.; Fisher, P.J. Fungal endophytes in Salicornia perennis. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1987, 87, 647–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ali, S.; Zhang, C.; Wang, Z.Q.; Wang, X.M.; Wu, J.H.; Cuthbertson, A.G.S.; Shao, Z.F.; Qiu, B.L. Toxicological and biochemical basis of synergism between the entomopathogenic fungus Lecanicillium muscarium and the insecticide matrine against Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius). Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 46558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, C.; Shao, Z.F.; Hen, Y.Y.; Wang, X.M.; Wang, Z.Q.; Musa, P.D.; Qiu, B.L.; Ali, S. Effects of Aschersonia aleyrodis on the life table and demographic parameters of Bemisia tabaci. J. Integr. Agric. 2018, 17, 60345–60347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, C.; Ali, S.; Musa, P.D.; Wang, X.M.; Qiu, B.L. Evaluation of the pathogenecity of Aschersonia aleyrodis on Bemisia tabaci in the laboratory and greenhouse. Biocontrol. Sci. Technol. 2017, 27, 210–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. SAS. SAS/GRAPH 9.1; SAS Institute: Cary, NC, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  33. Akello, J.; Dubois, T.; Coyne, D.; Kyamanywa, S. The effects of Beauveria bassiana dose and exposure duration on colonization and growth of tissue cultured banana (Musa sp.) plants. Biol. Control 2009, 49, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gurulingappa, P.; Sword, G.A.; Murdoch, G.; McGee, P.A. Colonization of crop plants by fungal entomopathogens and their effects on two insect pests when in planta. Biol. Control 2010, 55, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lopez, D.C.; Sword, G.A. The endophytic fungal entomopathogens Beauveria bassiana and Purpureocillium lilacinum enhance the growth of cultivated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and negatively affect survival of the cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa zea). Biol. Control 2015, 89, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Akutse, K.S.; Maniania, N.K.; Fiaboe, K.K.M.; Van Den Berg, J.; Ekesi, S. Endophytic colonization of Vicia faba and Phaseolus vulgaris (Fabaceae) by fungal pathogens and their effects on the life-history parameters of Liriomyza huidobrensis (Diptera: Agromyzidae). Fungal Ecol. 2013, 6, 293–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Khan, A.L.; Hamayun, M.; Khan, S.A.; Kang, S.M.; Shinwari, Z.K.; Kamran, M. Pur culture of Metarhizium anisopliae LHL07 reprograms to higher growth and mitigates salt stress. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 28, 1483–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Waller, F.; Achatz, B.; Baltruschat, H.; Fodor, J.; Becker, K.; Fischer, M.; Heier, T.; Hückelhoven, R.; Neumann, C.; Von Wettstein, D.; et al. The endophytic fungus Piriformospora indica reprograms barley to salt-stress tolerance, disease resistance and higher yield. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 13386–13391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. McKinnon, A.C.; Saari, S.; Moran-Diez, M.E.; Meyling, N.V.; Raad, M.; Glare, T.R. Beauveria bassiana as an endophyte: A critical review on associated methodology and biocontrol potential. BioControl 2017, 62, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tefera, T.; Vidal, S. Effect of inoculation method and plant growth medium on endophytic colonization of sorghum by the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana. Biocontrol 2009, 54, 663–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Brownbridge, M.; Reay, S.D.; Nelson TLGlare, T.R. Persistence of Beauveria bassiana (Ascomycota: Hypocreales) as an endophyte following inoculation of radiate pine seed and seedlings. Biol. Control 2012, 62, 194–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Quesada-Moraga, E.; López-Díaz, C.; Beatriz, B.B. The hidden habit of the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana: First demonstration of vertical plant transmission. PLoS ONE 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Posada, F.; Vega, F.E. Establishment of the fungal entomopathogen Beauveria bassiana (Ascomycota: Hypocreales) as an endophyte in cocoa seedlings (Theobroma cacao). Mycologia 2005, 97, 1195–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Reddy, N.P.; Khan, A.P.A.; Devi, U.K.; Sharma, H.C.; Reineke, A. Treatment of millet crop plant (Sorghum bicolor) with the entomopathogenic fungus (Beauveria bassiana) to combat infestation by the stem borer, Chilo partellus Swinhoe (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2009, 12, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Batta, Y.A. Efficacy of endophytic and applied Metarhizium anisopliae (Metch.) Sorokin (Ascomycota: Hypocreales) against larvae of Plutella xylostella L. (Yponomeutidae: Lepidoptera) infesting Brassica napus plants. Crop Prot. 2013, 44, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Guesmi-Jouini, J.; Garrido-Jurado, I.; López-Díaz, C.; Halima-Kamel, M.B.; QuesadaMoraga, E. Establishment of fungal entomopathogens Beauveria bassiana and Bionectria ochroleuca (Ascomycota: Hypocreales) as endophytes on artichoke Cynara scolymus. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2014, 119, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Vidal, S.; Jaber, L.R. Entomopathogenic fungi as endophytes: Plant-endophyte herbivore interactions and prospects for use in biological control. Curr. Sci. 2015, 109, 46–54. [Google Scholar]
  48. Gathage, J.W.; Lagat, Z.O.; Fiaboe, K.K.M.; Akutse, K.S.; Ekesi, S.; Maniania, N.K. Prospects of fungal endophytes in the control of Liriomyza leafminer flies in common bean Phaseolus vulgaris under field conditions. BioControl 2016, 61, 741–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lugtenberg, B.J.J.; Caradus, J.R.; Johnson, L.J. Fungal endophytes for sustainable crop production. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2016, 92, fiw194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rios-Moreno, A.; Resquin-Romero, G.; Arroyo-Manzanares, N.; Acre, L.; Quesada-Moraga, L. Destruxin A production by Metarhizium brunneum starins during transient endophyte colonization of Solanum tubersum. Biocontrol. Sci. Technol. 2016, 26, 1574–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Qayyum, M.A.; Wakil, W.; Arif, M.J.; Sahi, S.T.; Dunlap, C.A. Infection of Helicoverpa armigera by endophytic Beauveria bassiana colonizing tomato plants. Biol. Control 2015, 90, 200–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Barta, M. In planta bioassay on the effects of endophytic Beauveria strains against larvae of horse-chestnut leaf miner (Cameraria ohridella). Biol. Control 2018, 121, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Insects 11 00078 g001 550
Figure 1. Effect of Cordyceps fumosorosea isolates on percent germination of eggplant seeds. Error bars indicate the standard error of means based on five replicates (n = 5). Bars having different letters indicate that means are significantly different from each other at a 5% level of significance.
Figure 1. Effect of Cordyceps fumosorosea isolates on percent germination of eggplant seeds. Error bars indicate the standard error of means based on five replicates (n = 5). Bars having different letters indicate that means are significantly different from each other at a 5% level of significance.
Insects 11 00078 g001
Insects 11 00078 g002 550
Figure 2. Effect of Cordyceps fumosorosea isolates on growth parameters of eggplant after 30, 45, and 60 days of fungal treatment. (A) Root length; (B) shoot length; and (C,D) number of leaves. Error bars indicate the standard error of means based on five replicates (n = 5). Bars having different letters indicate that means are significantly different from each other at 5% level of significance.
Figure 2. Effect of Cordyceps fumosorosea isolates on growth parameters of eggplant after 30, 45, and 60 days of fungal treatment. (A) Root length; (B) shoot length; and (C,D) number of leaves. Error bars indicate the standard error of means based on five replicates (n = 5). Bars having different letters indicate that means are significantly different from each other at 5% level of significance.
Insects 11 00078 g002
Insects 11 00078 g003 550
Figure 3. Effect of Cordyceps fumosorosea isolates on dry weights of different plant parts after 60 days of fungal treatment. (A) Root dry weight; (B) shoot dry weight; (C) leaf dry weight; and (D) total plant dry weight. Error bars indicate the standard error of means based on five replicates (n = 5). Bars having different letters indicate that means are significantly different from each other at 5% level of significance.
Figure 3. Effect of Cordyceps fumosorosea isolates on dry weights of different plant parts after 60 days of fungal treatment. (A) Root dry weight; (B) shoot dry weight; (C) leaf dry weight; and (D) total plant dry weight. Error bars indicate the standard error of means based on five replicates (n = 5). Bars having different letters indicate that means are significantly different from each other at 5% level of significance.
Insects 11 00078 g003
Insects 11 00078 g004 550
Figure 4. Percent colonization of different plant parts by Cordyceps fumosorosea isolates after 30 days, 45 days and 60 days of fungal treatment. (A) Roots; (B) shoot; and (C) leaves. Error bars indicate the standard error of means based on five replicates (n = 5). Bars having different letters indicate that means are significantly different from each other at 5% level of significance.
Figure 4. Percent colonization of different plant parts by Cordyceps fumosorosea isolates after 30 days, 45 days and 60 days of fungal treatment. (A) Roots; (B) shoot; and (C) leaves. Error bars indicate the standard error of means based on five replicates (n = 5). Bars having different letters indicate that means are significantly different from each other at 5% level of significance.
Insects 11 00078 g004
Insects 11 00078 g005 550
Figure 5. Reduction in whitefly incidence by plants colonized by different Cordyceps fumosorosea isolates after 15 and 30 days whitefly inoculation.
Figure 5. Reduction in whitefly incidence by plants colonized by different Cordyceps fumosorosea isolates after 15 and 30 days whitefly inoculation.
Insects 11 00078 g005
Table
Table 1. Effect of C. fumosorosea colonization of egg hatchability (%) of B. tabaci.
Table 1. Effect of C. fumosorosea colonization of egg hatchability (%) of B. tabaci.
TreatmentsEgg Hatchability (%) at Different Intervals Post Treatment
15 Days30 Days
SP50282.97 ± 2.01 c80.34 ± 3.56 c
SP53575.45 ± 3.94 b73.10 ± 2.64 b
Control92.30 ± 1.32 a91.84 ± 1.23 a
F; df; P23.41; 2, 12; <0.00118.06; 2, 12; <0.001
Means in the same column followed by different letters are significantly different from each other at 5% level of significance. ± indicates the standard error of means based on five replicates (n = 5).
Table
Table 2. Percentage mortality of B. tabaci pupa in response to colonization of Cordyceps fumosorosea.
Table 2. Percentage mortality of B. tabaci pupa in response to colonization of Cordyceps fumosorosea.
TreatmentsPupal mortality (%) at Different Intervals Post Treatment
15 Days30 Days
SP50220.82 ± 2.01 b28.40 ± 3.56b
SP53525.97 ± 3.94 a33.19 ± 2.64 a
Control3.52 ± 1.32 c4.21 ± 1.23 c
F; df; P35.89;2,12;<0.00143.25;2,12;<0.001
Means in the same column followed by different letters are significantly different from each other at 5% level of significance. ± indicates the standard error of means based on five replicates (n = 5).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, T.; Shen, Z.; Shaukat, M.; Du, C.; Ali, S. Endophytic Isolates of Cordyceps fumosorosea to Enhance the Growth of Solanum melongena and Reduce the Survival of Whitefly (Bemisia tabaci). Insects 2020, 11, 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11020078

AMA Style

Sun T, Shen Z, Shaukat M, Du C, Ali S. Endophytic Isolates of Cordyceps fumosorosea to Enhance the Growth of Solanum melongena and Reduce the Survival of Whitefly (Bemisia tabaci). Insects. 2020; 11(2):78. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11020078

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Tingfei, Zhang Shen, Mobeen Shaukat, Cailian Du, and Shaukat Ali. 2020. "Endophytic Isolates of Cordyceps fumosorosea to Enhance the Growth of Solanum melongena and Reduce the Survival of Whitefly (Bemisia tabaci)" Insects 11, no. 2: 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11020078

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop