Next Article in Journal
Effects of Endophytic Entomopathogenic Ascomycetes on the Life-History Traits of Aphis gossypii Glover and Its Interactions with Melon Plants
Previous Article in Journal
Functional Morphology and Defensive Behavior in a Social Aphid
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 10
Issue 6
10.3390/insects10060164
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

RNAi-Mediated Knockdown of Tssk1 and Tektin1 Genes Impair Male Fertility in Bactrocera dorsalis

by
Summar Sohail
1,
Kaleem Tariq
2,
Weiwei Zheng
1,
Muhammad Waqar Ali
1,
Wei Peng
1,
Muhammad Fahim Raza
1 and
Hongyu Zhang
1,*
1
Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology (MOE), State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, China-Australia Joint Research Centre for Horticultural and Urban Pests, Institute of Urban and Horticultural Entomology, College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China
2
Department of Agriculture, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 23200, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2019, 10(6), 164; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10060164
Submission received: 10 May 2019 / Revised: 3 June 2019 / Accepted: 5 June 2019 / Published: 10 June 2019
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The genetic-based sterile insect technique (SIT) is an effective and environmentally safe strategy to diminish populations of agricultural and horticultural insect pests. Functional characterization of genes related to male fertility can enhance the genetic-based SIT. Tssk1 has been involved to control male fertility in both mammals and insects. Moreover, Tektin1 has also been revealed to influence male fertility in both human and mammals. These findings suggested that Tssk1 and Tektin1 identified from Bactrocera dorsalis could be required for male fertility in B. dorsalis. In this study, expression profiles of these two genes were studied at different developmental stages and in various tissues of adult males. Remarkably, it was found that Tssk1 and Tektin1 were highly expressed in the testis of mature adult males of B. dorsalis. Furthermore, Tssk1 and Tektin1 genes were downregulated by using the RNA interference (RNAi) method. Fertility assays including egg laying, hatching, and spermatozoa count were also performed to investigate male fertility of B. dorsalis. Results showed that knockdown of Tssk1 and Tektin1 caused male sterility up to 58.99% and 64.49%, respectively. As expected, the total numbers of spermatozoa were also significantly reduced by 65.83% and 73.9%, respectively. These results suggested that male sterility was happened wing to the low number of spermatozoa. In conclusion, we demonstrate that Tssk1 and Tektin1 are the novel agents that could be used to enhance the genetic-based SIT, or their double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) can be used as biopesticides to control the population of B. dorsalis.

1. Introduction

The oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) is one of the most damaging invasive pest species that attacks more than 250 horticultural crops [1,2,3]. The infestation of B. dorsalis has imposed serious losses on the production of fruits and vegetables [4]. Currently, chemical insecticides are being used to control the population of B. dorsalis [5,6]. Chemical insecticides have a detrimental impact on human health, wildlife, the environment, and the further development of insecticide-resistant populations [7]. Therefore, there is an urgent need for an alternative control method that can effectively control the insect pest population without using chemical insecticides. An example of such a nonchemical insect control method is the sterile insect technique (SIT).
The SIT is one of the most environmentally friendly insect pest control methods and can be employed to control multiple insect pests. Irradiation-based SIT has been used to control agricultural insect pests, including fruit flies [8,9]. Ionizing radiation sources have been utilized to sterilize the male insects, and these sterile males were afterward introduced into the field [10], although irradiation can potentially exert a negative impact on the fitness of male insects due to which male insects mating competitiveness is reduced. Mating competitiveness of sterile males is required to enable wild males to mate with wild females [10]. Currently, genetic-based SIT is proving very effective at overcoming the pest population without disrupting male insect competitiveness. Functional characterization of more genes related to spermatogenesis of B. dorsalis can help to improve the genetic-based SIT.
Spermatogenesis is a series of molecular and biochemical processes by which spermatogonia undergo a series of proliferations, differentiations, and deformations in the testis, which ultimately forms functional sperm [11,12]. Spermiogenesis is the final stage of spermatogenesis, during which spermatids experience numerous morphological changes, for example, acrosomes formation, nuclear condensation, development of the flagellum, and reorganization of cytoplasm; finally, mature spermatozoa are formed. These significant changes are regulated by gene transcription [13] and protein translation during spermatogenesis. It is recognized that down regulation of spermatogenesis-related genes causes sterility in males of B. dorsalis [14].
A variety of protein kinases play critical roles in the regulation of spermatogenesis. One major group of such protein kinases is testis-specific serine/threonine kinases (TSSKs). Until now, five members of the TSSK family have been recognized, and all are significantly expressed in the testis [15]. Different members of the TSSK gene family have been known to be expressed at various stages of spermatogenesis [16,17,18,19]. Tssk1 was identified as the first member of the TSSKs family [20]. Subsequently, the Tssk1 gene was used as a probe to clone and describe the molecular characteristics of the Tssk2 gene in mice [21]. Earlier studies displayed that Tssk1 was expressed in mature spermatozoa, and many research reports have revealed its multiple roles in mammalian spermatogenesis [22]. Moreover, the expression of Tssk1 has been identified in the testis of the Bactrocera tryoni. Double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) feeding of Tssk1 in B. tryoni significantly silenced the gene and caused male sterility, suggesting its role in the male reproduction of tephritid insects [23].
Tektins are another family of proteins that play an important role in the formation of flagella, cilia, and centrioles [24,25,26,27], and stabilize axonemal microtubules. Tektins were initially cloned in sea urchins [25]. Tektins have been identified in various animals, including humans, silk worms, and mice [28,29,30]. Tektins are highly coiled-coiled proteins that constitute filaments in ciliary and flagellar microtubules [31,32]. Tektin1 is expressed in the human testis and mouse flagella [33]. The evidence for Tektin1 expression in sperm flagella supports the hypothesis that Tektin1 plays an important role in the movement of sperm flagella [34]. RNA interference (RNAi), which is a robust and powerful research tool, has been widely used to sterilize males for genetic-based SIT through gene silencing in various insects, including B. dorsalis [35,36,37].
Evidence from the previous studies shows that Tssk1 and Tektin1 are important genes for male fertility. Transcriptomic analysis from the testis of B. dorsalis has revealed that Tssk1 and Tektin1 are up-regulated in the testis, but their functions remain unknown [38]. Therefore, we hypothesized that these genes may play important roles in spermatogenesis and can be promising candidates to enhance the genetic-based SIT to control B. dorsalis population. We measured the expression profiles and used the RNAi technique combined with fertility bioassays to investigate gene silencing effects on male fertility.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Flies Rearing

The strains of B. dorsalis were reared in the laboratory according to previously described method [39]. Population of adult flies were kept in cages at 28 °C under a 12 h light. The flies were further kept under dark photoperiod for 12 h on artificial diets. The diets consisted of 2.5% yeast extract, 7.5% sugar, 2.5% honey, 0.5% agar, and 87% ddH2O. Newly hatched larvae were nourished periodically on banana pulp [40].

2.2. Selection of Target Genes for RNAi

Selection of two target genes was made based on previous studies [23,38]. Sequences of Tssk1 (GenBank accession number: XM_011212727.2) and Tektin1 (GenBank accession number: XM_011202998.1) were chosen as target genes. Gene-specific primers were prepared for chosen genes using the database of NCBI Primer BLAST (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/ (Table 1). Sequence similarity of target genes with other insect species was determined by sequence alignment through ClustalW, and phylogenetic tree was constructed by using Mega 5.1 software. Neighborhood joining method along with 1000 bootstrap was used to construct the tree.

2.3. Expression Profile Analysis

The gene expression was evaluated at all developmental stages, and different body tissues were evaluated through quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis. For expression analysis at different stages, insects at different developmental stages were collected and washed using DEPC water, including eggs, larva, and pupa. Immature insects were collected 5 h after ecolosion. Adult insects were collected 14 days after emergence. 20 individuals were used for each treatment. For tissue expression analysis, 30 adult insects were dissected under microscope (Olympus SZX12, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and immediately collected in DEPC water. Different tissues (head, abdomen, midgut, Malpighian tubules, fat body, and testis) were collected, and total RNA was isolated. Single strand cDNA was prepared by using the cDNA kit (ThermoScientific, USA, Catalog No. k1641). Tssk1 and Tektin1 gene expression was analyzed at different developmental stages, and different tissues were analyzed through qRT-PCR.

2.4. Preparation of Double Stranded RNAs

Double stranded RNAs were synthesized using open reading frame (ORF) of Tssk1 and Tektin1 of 380 bp and 320 bp fragments. Control EGFP–dsRNA with 495 bp was prepared using the EGFP primers. All dsRNAs of desired genes (Tssk1 and Tektin1) and control dsRNA were prepared using the T7 RiboMAXM Express RNAi System (Promega, Catalog No. P1700). The newly prepared dsRNA was purified by MEGAclear (Ambion) and kept at −80 °C for further use.

2.5. Feeding of dsRNA

The newly emerged male and female flies of B. dorsalis were employed as experimental materials. Male and females were separated in rearing cages (18 cm × 9 cm × 9 cm). Male insects were starved for 24 h, and then fed 1.0 mL dsRNA of three different concentrations (500 ng/µL, 700 ng/µL, 1000 ng/µL) for 6 h as in our previous study [35]. After 6 h of dsRNA feeding, insects were shifted on normal diet. The dsRNA-egfp was selected as control. 100 insects were used for each treatment. Each treatment set was replicated three times. After 12 days, hatching percentage and sperm count were recorded.

2.6. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR) Analysis

Impact of various concentrations of dsRNA on gene transcription was investigated using a quantitative real-time PCR. Every 24 h, total RNA was periodically isolated from 10 adult male insects. The commercially available kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was employed to prepare single strand cDNA. qRT-PCR analysis was carried out on a Bio-Rad iCycler using Universal SYBR Green iTaq™ Supermix (BioRad, Catalog No. 172-5124, Hercules, CA, USA) as per company instructions [41]. Target primers of Tssk1 and Tektin1 were prepared for qRT-PCR analysis. Total used 20 μL reaction volume consisted of 0.8 μL of forward and reverse primers; 2 μL cDNA, 6.4 μL ddH2O and 10 μL of SYBR Master Mix were used for quantification. The reaction was carried out under optimized thermal cycler amplification conditions for RT-qPCR [14]. The obtained data was examined according to Ali et al. [35].

2.7. Reproduction Bioassays

The twenty pairs of dsRNA-treated males and untreated females were separately nourished on a normal artificial diet for 13 days. Afterward, these insects were transferred into a new container for mating. After 24 h, eggs were picked up within 20 min of egg laying from the paper cup placed on banana. The collected eggs were carefully placed and counted manually on A4-sized black paper sheet. Thereafter, hatching efficiency was estimated by placing eggs on banana pulp under controlled environmental conditions. The number of hatched larvae of aged 3–5 days were manually counted. The reproductive capacity of adult males was determined using online calculator compared to those with a control group [42].

2.8. Spermatozoa Counts and Sperm Viability Assays

Testis of 12 days old male flies were dissected in a petri dish containing Hayes solution (added mixture of 0.2 g CaCl2, 9.0 g NaCl, 0.1 g NaHCO3, and 0.2 g KCl in 1000 mL H2O). Immediately after being punctured with forceps, 2 μL of flowing sperm was collected. These sperm were diluted with 250 μL of Hayes solution. Sperm numbers were counted with previously described method [43]. In brief, sperm were fixed carefully in ethanol and air dried. Finally, air dried sperm were stained with DAPI for 15 min. Spermatozoa were counted by using a fluorescence microscope. Sperm viability was observed by using the sperm viability kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Catalog No. L-7011), which contains two luminous dyes that assisted us to distinguish between dead (red propidium iodide gives red emission) and live sperm (SYBR-14, gives green emission dye) cells. 5 μL of diluted sperm was first incubated with 5 μL of SYBR-14 working solution (2 μL SYBR-14 stock in 98 μL Hayes solution) on a glass microscope slide in the dark room at 25 °C for 10 min, followed by 7 min incubation with propidium iodide. UMNG2 microscope was used (Olympus) to measure sperm viability. Microscope was set at 400 × magnifications, and at least 400 live and dead sperm cells per slide were counted. Dual-stained sperm cells were not included in the data. Sperm viability was obtained for each sample by calculating the percentage of live sperm in the total number of sperms counted. To validate our experimental procedure, we killed the sperm in a sample by placing the sample at −80 °C for 8 h. The viability of all sperm was calculated and observed as stained red.

2.9. Data Analyses

Statistical analyses for data of gene expression in various developmental stages and tissues were carried out using statistical software SPSS 19.00 (SPSS. Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Experimental data of all replicates were analyzed through one-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) using GraphPad prism 5.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). For qRT-PCR, an independent Tukey test was performed, and for egg laying and hatching data student t-test was performed. The data was normalized as described previously [44].

3. Results

3.1. Selection of Genes Related to Spermatogenesis

We have selected two genes, Tssk1 (XM_011212727.2) and Tektin1 (XM_011202998.1), which are related to male fertility based on previous studies [23,33]. Partial nucleotide sequences of Tssk1 and Tektin1 were 1761 and 1607 bp long. ORF of these two genes encodes amino acids of 900 and 1266bp, respectively. Nucleotide sequence of Tssk1 gene shares more than 95% identity with B. tryoni [23]. Amino acid sequence of Tssk1 also aligned with other insects (Figure S1). The alignment results indicate that Tssk1 of B. dorsalis shares 70–95% identity with other insects, whereas the sequence alignment of Tektin1 sequence with the Tektin genes of other insects shows identity 60–95% with other insects (Figure S2). The sequence analysis through multiple alignments suggests that these are naturally conserved genes. Phylogenetic analysis of Tektin gene family shows that Tektin1 gene of B. dorsalis is closely related to Tektin1 gene of Bactrocera Latifrons (Figure 1A), whereas phylogenetic analysis of Tssk protein family indicates that Tssk1 of B. dorsalis is closely located to Tssk1 gene of Cerattis Capitata (Figure 1B).

3.2. Expression Profiles of Target Genes

Previously transcriptomic analysis [38] of cDNA library identified testis-specific genes, of which two genes (Tssk1 and Tektin1) were upregulated in mature male adults. To verify the putative mRNA expression pattern of these two genes (Tssk1 and Tektin1) in the sexual maturation of male adults, expression profiles of target genes Tssk1 & Tektin1 were measured through qRT-PCR at different developmental stages of male insects. Results demonstrated that Tssk1 mRNA was expressed in immature and mature adults, whereas Tektin1 gene was detected in pupae, immature, and mature adults (Figure 2A,B). Both genes were more highly expressed in mature adults than immature adults.
Expression profiles of Tssk1 and Tektin1 were also investigated in different body tissues of the male adults of B. dorsalis. qRT-PCR results indicated that Tssk1 and Tektin1 were expressed in all body tissues, but their expression was much higher in testis than in other tissues (Figure 3A,B).

3.3. Effect of dsRNA Feeding on Tssk1 and Tektin1 Expression

The highest expression of Tssk1 and Tektin1 in the testis of male adults indicated their important functions in male fertility. Therefore, knockdown experiments using RNAi were carried out to investigate the functions of these two genes (Tssk1 and Tektin1) in the male fertility of B. dorsalis. Real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis was performed after oral feeding of dsRNA of Tssk1 and Tektin1 genes for 6 h on newly emerged male adults. The results showed successful delivery of dsRNA, as evidenced by the fold change in the gene expression. Fold change in the gene expression was measured for five consecutive days. The results showed that highest down-regulation effect was found in the 1st day with the feeding of dsTssk1 at concentrations of 500 ng/μL, 700 ng/ΜL, and 1000 ng/μL, which was about 31%, 50%, and 62%, respectively (Figure 4A). With the feeding of dsTektin1 at concentrations of 500 ng/μL, 700 ng/ μL, and 1000 ng/μL, maximum downregulation in the gene transcription was also found on the first day, at approximately 33%, 50%, and 71%, respectively (Figure 4B).
Further, mRNA level of Tssk1 and Tektin1 was measured in testis after 24 h of dsRNA feeding. Reduction in mRNA level was also observed in testis with dsRNA feeding of both genes (Figure 5A,B).

3.4. Effect of Genes Silencing on the Reproductive Capacity of Males

To investigate the effects of gene silencing of Tssk1 and Tektin1 on the reproductive capacity of male flies of B. dorsalis and daily numbers of eggs laid, hatching assays were carried out. Results indicated that there was no significant difference in the numbers of eggs laid between dsRNA feeding of target genes and control (ds-egfp) group (Figure 6A). The same genes (Tssk1 and Tektin1) were chosen, and the effect of the dsRNA feeding on male fertility was analyzed. The target genes exhibited significant impact on the hatching rate of eggs. Sterility in Tssk1 and Tektin1 knockdown males was observed up to 58.99% and 64.49%, respectively, compared to the control (ds-egfp) group (Figure 6B,C).

3.5. Effects of Gene Silencing on the Quantity and Quality of Spermatozoa

To explore the reason for male sterility, we further measured the number of spermatozoa in the testis of 14 days old males treated with dsTssk1, dsTektin1, and ds-egfp (control) group. Significant decrease in the numbers of spermatozoa was noticed in dsTssk1- and dsTektin1-treated males, comprising 65.83% and 73.9%, respectively, compared to control (Figure 7A,B). It is not confirmed whether decrease in the number of sperms is the main reason for sterility in males (64.49%). We assumed that there are multiple reasons for reduced fertility. Thus, the viability of sperm in the treated and control flies was examined. Interestingly, more dead sperm were found than live sperm in the Tektin1-treated males than control males. Total live sperm in treated flies were reduced up to 55% compared to control group (Figure 8A,B). These results suggested that disruption of Tssk1 and Tektin1 genes affects male fertility by affecting the production of mature spermatozoa and their viability.

4. Discussion

Sterile insect technique (SIT) is an environmentally friendly pest control approach that has already been employed in B. dorsalis [45]. Up till now, successful implementation of SIT at commercial level has been very critical to creating a vast number of high-quality sterile males. In the present study, Tssk1 and Tektin1 were knocked down using RNAi to enhance the genetic-based SIT for the management of B. dorsalis. Firstly, we detected the expression profiles of Tssk1 and Tektin1 at different developmental stages and in different tissues of the males of B. dorsalis. Highest expression of both genes was observed in testis of mature male adults of B. dorsalis. These results were consistent with the studies indicating that Tssk1 and Tektin1 are essential for male fertility [23,29]. We may suggest that these genes have important functions in spermatogenesis of target insect B. dorsalis. To our knowledge, we have identified for the first time the mRNA expression of two genes (Tssk1 and Tektin1) throughout the life span of male of B. dorsalis and studied their silencing effects on reproductive capacity of male flies.
Further detailed study on the expression pattern of Tssk1 and Tektin1 in different tissues of B. dorsalis revealed that both genes were expressed in all tested tissues. It is suggested that Tssk1 and Tektin1 might be involved in several physiological processes and regulate the protein stability in insects [22,26,32,33]. During sexual maturation, important changes happen at the transcriptional level in insects [46]. In the present study, both genes exhibited different expression patterns between immature and mature male adults. This kind of different expression pattern suggests that they may play multiple roles in the reproductive development of male adults of B. dorsalis.
RNAi in our current study have reduced the efficacy of target genes, which is consistent with the previous studies of RNAi in B. dorsalis [3]. In contrast, RNAi in some lepidopteran insects proved ineffective [47], which might be due to inappropriate dsRNA concentration or due to environmental effects. We used the dsRNA feeding method because it was more convenient than microinjection. It is evident from the previous study that feeding of dsRNA is effective for gene functional study or gene screening on a large scale [48]. Nucleotide sequence selection, appropriate concentration, and suitable application methods are prerequisites to attain the careful silencing effects of dsRNA. Considerably long-lasting effects of Tssk1 and Tektin1 deficiency were examined on male fertility of B. dorsalis, which ultimately resulted in reduced egg hatching rate compared to their controls (Figure 5). Males of B. dorsalis typically take two weeks to reach sexual maturity [38,49], which provided us with sufficient time to deliver enough dsRNA to impact the maturing male’s reproductive capacity. To our surprise, when insects were fed with dsRNA of target genes before sexual maturation, it resulted in a decreased egg hatching rate.
The present results demonstrated that dsRNA application of Tssk1 gene reduced mRNA expression and reproductive capacity in male flies of B. dorsalis (Figure 5B). These results are consistent with previous studies that showed that dsRNA of Tssk1 in Bactrocera tryoni silenced the gene effectively and caused male sterility [23]. In insect spermatogenesis, a Tssk1 protein is involved in post-meiotic chromatin remodeling, which is encoded by Tssk1 gene [38]. Mutation or knockdown of Tssk1 gene caused male sterility in mice, drosophila, and Queensland fruit fly [22,50]. In our Tssk1 knock-down experiments, the impaired male fertility of B. dorsalis might be due to the defects in post-meiotic chromatin remodeling. Tektin is a microtubule specific protein identified in different animals including silkworm and is indispensable for sperm motility [29]. Knock-down of Tektin1 gene impaired male fertility of B. dorsalis due to decreased number of spermatozoa and their viability. The defects in sperm motility could be the possible cause of decrease in number of spermatozoa.

5. Conclusions

The present study reveals that Tssk1 and Tektin1 play important roles in male fertility of B. dorsalis. Our results help illuminate the molecular mechanism regulating spermatogenesis in males. Interestingly, feeding dsRNA of Tssk1 and Tektin1 genes significantly downregulated the expression of Tssk1 and Tektin1 in males of B. dorsalis. The disrupted expression of Tssk1 and Tektin1 affected the reproductive capacity significantly, resulting in a reduced number of spermatozoa. The reduced quantity and quality of spermatozoa ultimately resulted in male sterility. It is believed that Tssk1 and Tektin1 may be promising targets for the development of genetic-based SIT, or that their dsRNA could potentially be used to eliminate the population of B. dorsalis.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/10/6/164/s1, Figure S1: Sequence analysis of Tssk1. Multiple alignment of Tssk1 proteins from B. dorsalis and 15 other insect species were performed using clustalW method. Mega 5.1 software was used. Blue, orange, red, and green indicate 70%, 80%, 90%, and 100% sequence similarity, Figure S2: Sequence analysis of Tektin1. Multiple alignment of Tektin1 proteins from B. dorsalis and 14 other insect species were performed using ClustalW method. Mega 5.1 software was used. Blue, orange, red, and green indicate 60%, 80%, 90%, and 100% sequence similarity.

Author Contributions

S.S. and H.Z. conceived and designed the study; S.S. performed designed experiments; and S.S., M.W.A., W.P. and M.F.R. analyzed the data. S.S. prepared the manuscript. H.Z., W.Z. and K.T. revised the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Key R & D Program of China (Nos. 2017YFD0200904 and 2017YFD0202000), the earmarked fund for the China Agricultural Research System (No. CARS-26), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31572008 and 31872931) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2662019PY055).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders were not involved in the design of the study, the interpretation of the data, or the writing of the manuscript.

References

  1. Clarke, A.R.; Armstrong, K.F.; Carmichael, A.E.; Milne, J.R.; Raghu, S.; Roderick, G.K.; Yeates, D.K. Invasive Yeates. phytophagous pests arising through a recent tropical evolutionary radiation: The Bactrocera dorsalis complex of fruit flies. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2005, 50, 293–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, A.; Zheng, W.; Zheng, W.; Zhang, H. The effects of RNA interference targeting Bactrocera dorsalis ds-Bdrpl19 on the gene expression of rpl19 in non-target insects. Ecotoxicology 2015, 24, 595–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, X.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, H. RNA interference of four genes in adult Bactrocera dorsalis by feeding their dsRNAs. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e17788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, H.Y; Li, H.Y. Photographic Guide to Key Control Techniques for Citrus Disease and Insect Pests; Chinese Agricultural Press: Beijing, China, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  5. Jin, T.; Zeng, L.; Lin, Y.; Lu, Y.; Liang, G. Insecticide resistance of the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae), in mainland China. Pest Manag. Sci. 2011, 67, 370–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lu, X.-P.; Wang, L.-L.; Huang, Y.; Dou, W.; Chen, C.-T.; Wei, D.; Wang, J.-J. The epsilon glutathione S-transferases contribute to the malathion resistance in the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2016, 180, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Colborn, T.; Vom Saal, F.S.; Soto, A.M. Developmental effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in wildlife and humans. Environ. Health Perspect. 1993, 101, 378–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Leftwich, P.T.; Bolton, M.; Chapman, T. Evolutionary biology and genetic technique for insect control. Evol. Appl. 2016, 9, 212–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lees, R.S.; Gilles, J.R.; Hendrichs, J.; Vreysen, M.J.; Bourtzis, K. Back to the future: The sterile insect technique against mosquito disease vectors. Curr. Opin. Insect. Sci. 2015, 10, 156–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lance, D.; McInnis, D. Biological Basis of the Sterile Insect Technique, in Sterile Insect Technique; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2005; pp. 69–94. [Google Scholar]
  11. Fuller, M.T. Spermatogenesis. In The Development of Drosophila melanogaster; Martinez-Arias, M., Bate, M., Eds.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 1993; pp. 71–147. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lindsley, D.L.; Tokuyasu, K. The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1980; pp. 225–294. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hake, L.E.; Alcivar, A.A.; Hecht, N.B. Changes in mRNA length accompany translational regulation of the somatic and testis-specific cytochrome c genes during spermatogenesis in the mouse. Development 1990, 110, 249–257. [Google Scholar]
  14. Tariq, K.; Metzendorf, C.; Peng, W.; Sohail, S.; Zhang, H. miR-8-3p regulates mitoferrin in the testes of Bactrocera dorsalis to ensure normal spermatogenesis. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, Y.; Sosnik, J.; Brassard, L.; Reese, M.; Spiridonov, N.A.; Bates, T.C.; Salicioni, A.M. Expression and localization of five members of the testis-specific serine kinase (Tssk) family in mouse and human sperm and testis. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2010, 17, 42–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Li, H.H.; Kong, L.F.; Yu, R.; Yu, H.; Li, Q. Characterization, expression, and functional analysis of testis-specific serine/threonine kinase 1 (Tssk1) in the pen shell Atrina pectinata. Invertebr. Reprod. Dev. 2016, 60, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zuercher, G.; Rohrbach, V.; Andres, A.-C.; Ziemiecki, A. A novel member of the testis specific serine kinase family, tssk-3, expressed in the Leydig cells of sexually mature mice. Mech. Dev. 2000, 93, 175–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, X.; Lin, G.; Wei, Y.; Hexige, S.; Niu, Y.; Liu, L.; Yu, L. TSSK5, a novel member of the testis-specific serine/threonine kinase family, phosphorylates CREB at Ser-133, and stimulates the CRE/CREB responsive pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 333, 742–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Spiridonov, N.A.; Wong, L.; Zerfas, P.M.; Starost, M.F.; Pack, S.D.; Paweletz, C.P.; Johnson, G.R. Identification and characterization of SSTK, a serine/threonine protein kinase essential for male fertility. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005, 25, 4250–4261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bielke, W.; Blaschke, R.; Miescher, G.; Zürcher, G.; Andres, A.-C.; Ziemiecki, A. Characterization of a novel murine testis-specific serine/threonine kinase. Gene 1994, 139, 235–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kueng, P.; Nikolova, Z.; Djonov, V.; Hemphill, A.; Rohrbach, V.; Boehlen, D.; Ziemiecki, A. A novel family of serine/threonine kinases participating in spermiogenesis. J. Cell. Biol. 1997, 139, 1851–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xu, B.; Hao, Z.; Jha, K.N.; Zhang, Z.; Urekar, C.; Digilio, L.; Herr, J.C. Targeted deletion of Tssk1 and 2 causes male infertility due to haploinsufficiency. Dev. Biol. 2008, 319, 211–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Cruz, C.; Tayler, A.; Whyard, S. RNA Interference-Mediated Knockdown of Male Fertility Genes in the Queensland Fruit Fly Bactrocera tryoni (Diptera: Tephritidae). Insects 2018, 9, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Larsson, M.; Norrander, J.; Gräslund, S.; Brundell, E.; Linck, R.; Ståhl, S.; Höög, C. The spatial and temporal expression of Tekt1, a mouse tektin C homologue, during spermatogenesis suggest that it is involved in the development of the sperm tail basal body and axoneme. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2000, 79, 718–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Linck, R.; Amos, L.; Amos, W. Localization of tektin filaments in microtubules of sea urchin sperm flagella by immunoelectron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 1985, 100, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Norrander, J.; Larsson, M.; Ståhl, S.; Höög, C.; Linck, R. Expression of ciliary tektins in brain and sensory development. J. Neurosci. 1998, 18, 8912–8918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Steffen, W.; Linck, R. Evidence for tektins in centrioles and axonemal microtubules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1988, 85, 2643–2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ota, A.; Kusakabe, T.; Sugimoto, Y.; Takahashi, M.; Nakajima, Y.; Kawaguchi, Y.; Koga, K. Cloning and characterization of testis-specific tektin in Bombyx mori. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2002, 133, 371–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Oiki, S.; Hiyama, E.; Gotoh, T.; Iida, H. Localization of Tektin 1 at both acrosome and flagella of mouse and bull spermatozoa. Zool. Sci. 2014, 31, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Iguchi, N.; Tanaka, H.; Nakamura, Y.; Nozaki, M.; Fujiwara, T.; Nishimune, Y. Cloning and characterization of the human Tektin-T gene. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2002, 8, 525–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Linck, R.; Fu, X.; Lin, J.; Ouch, C.; Schefter, A.; Steffen, W.; Nicastro, D. Insights into the Structure and Function of Ciliary and Flagellar Doublet Microtubules TEKTINS, Ca2+-BINDING PROTEINS, AND STABLE PROTOFILAMENTS. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 17427–17444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Norrander, J.M.; Perrone, C.A.; Amos, L.A.; Linck, R.W. Structural comparison of tektins and evidence for their determination of complex spacings in flagellar microtubules. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 257, 385–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xu, M.; Zhou, Z.; Cheng, C.; Zhao, W.; Tang, R.; Huang, Y.; Xie, Y. Cloning and characterization of a novel human TEKTIN1 gene. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2001, 33, 1172–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tanaka, H.; Iguchi, N.; Toyama, Y.; Kitamura, K.; Takahashi, T.; Kaseda, K.; Nishimune, Y. Mice deficient in the axonemal protein Tektin-t exhibit male infertility and immotile-cilium syndrome due to impaired inner arm dynein function. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2004, 24, 7958–7964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ali, M.W.; Zheng, W.; Sohail, S.; Li, Q.; Zheng, W.; Zhang, H. A genetically enhanced sterile insect technique against the fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) by feeding adult double stranded RNAs. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 4063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ant, T.; Koukidou, M.; Rempoulakis, P.; Gong, H.-F.; Economopoulos, A.; Vontas, J.; Alphey, L. Control of the olive fruit fly using genetics-enhanced sterile insect technique. BMC Biol. 2012, 10, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Whyard, S.; Erdelyan, C.N.; Partridge, A.L.; Singh, A.D.; Beebe, N.W.; Capina, R. Silencing the buzz: A new approach to population suppression of mosquitoes by feeding larvae double-stranded RNAs. Parasit. Vectors 2015, 8, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wei, D.; Li, H.M.; Yang, W.J.; Wei, D.D.; Dou, W.; Huang, Y.; Wang, J.J. Transcriptome profiling of the testis reveals genes involved in spermatogenesis and marker discovery in the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis. Insect Mol. Biol. 2015, 24, 41–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Peng, W.; Zheng, W.; Handler, A.M.; Zhang, H. The role of the transformer gene in sex determination and reproduction in the tephritid fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel). Genetica 2015, 143, 717–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, G.; Wu, Q.; Li, J.; Zhang, G.; Wan, F. RNAi-mediated knock-down of transformer and transformer 2 to generate male-only progeny in the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel). PLoS ONE 2015, 10, 0128892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yao, Z.; Wang, A.; Li, Y.; Cai, Z.; Lemaitre, B.; Zhang, H. The dual oxidase gene BdDuox regulates the intestinal bacterial community homeostasis of Bactrocera dorsalis. ISME J. 2016, 10, 1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Find Percentage with Percent Increase Online Calculator. Available online: https://www.marshu.com/articles/calculate-percentage-increase-decrease-percent-calculator.php (accessed on 31 January 2018).
  43. Bressac, C.; Chevrier, C. Offspring and sex ratio are independent of sperm management in Eupelmus orientalis females. J. Insect. Physiol. 1998, 44, 351–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Orankanok, W.; Chinvinijkul, S.; Thanaphum, S.; Sitilob, P.; Enkerlin, W. Area-wide integrated control of oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis and guava fruit fly Bactrocera correcta in Thailand. In Area-Wide Control of Insect Pests; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 517–526. [Google Scholar]
  46. Zheng, Z.; Guan, M.; Jia, Y.; Wang, D.; Pang, R.; Lv, F.; Xue, Y. The coordinated roles of miR-26a and miR-30c in regulating TGFβ1-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in diabetic nephropathy. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 37492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kupferschmidt, K. A lethal dose of RNA. Science 2013, 341, 732–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kamath, R.S.; Martinez-Campos, M.; Zipperlen, P.; Fraser, A.G.; Ahringer, J. Effectiveness of specific RNA-mediated interference through ingested double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genome Biol. 2000, 2, research0002.1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xie, Q.; Zhang, R.J. Study advance on biology and ecology of Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) and its control. Ecol. Sci. 2005, 24, 52–56. [Google Scholar]
  50. Perezgasga, L.; Jiang, J.; Bolival, B.J.; Hiller, M.; Benson, E.; Fuller, M.T.; White-Cooper, H. Regulation of transcription of meiotic cell cycle and terminal differentiation genes by the testis-specific Zn-finger protein matotopetli. Development 2004, 131, 1691–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Insects 10 00164 g001 550
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of Tektin, and Tssk gene family of B. dorsalis and different insect species. I41 proteins of Tssk and 63 proteins of Tektin family were analyzed. Different colors indicate different orders of insects. Black color indicates B. dorsalis (A) mehroon (Diptera), blue (Coloeopltera), yellow (Lepidoptera), green (Hymenoptera), purple (Siphonaptera), and red (Blattodae). (B) Mehroon (Diptera), green (Hymenoptera), blue (Lepidopters), and orange (Coleoptera). Names of different insects are Aaeg (Aedes aegypti), Acer (Apis cerana), Agla (Anoplophora glabripennis), Amel (Apis mellifera), Apla (Agrilus planipennis), Aroz (Athalia rosae), Aver (Asbolus verrucosus), Bdor (Bactrocera dorsalis), Bimp (Bombus impatiens), Blat (Bactrocera latifrons), Bole (Bactrocera olea), Bter (Bombus terrestris), Bmor (Bombyx mori), Ccal (Ceratina calcarata), Ccap (Ceratitis capitata), Ccin (Cephus cinctus), Ccos (Cyphomyrmex costatus), Cfel (Ctenocephalides felis), Cflo (Camponotus floridanus) Clec (Cimex lectularius), Csec (Cryptotermes secundus), Dall (Diachasma alloeum), Dbip (Drosophila bipectinata), Dbus (Drosophila busckii), Dele (Drosophila elegans), Dere (Drosophila erecta), Deug (Drosophila eugracilis), Dfic (Drosophila ficusphila), Dgua (Drosophila guanche), Dhyd (Drosophila hydei), Dkik (Drosophila kikkawai), Dmir (Drosophila miranda), Dnav (Drosophila navojoa), Dobs (Drosophila obscura), Dqua (Drosophila guanche), Dnov (Dufourea novaeangliae), Drho (Drosophila rhopaloa), Dser (Drosophila serrata), Dsuz (Drosophila suzukii, Dtak (Drosophila takahashii), Dwil (Drosophila willistoni), Dobs (Drosophila obscura), Dpon (Dendroctonus ponderosae), Dser (Drosophila serrata), Dnav (Drosophila navojoa), Dalb (Aedes albopictus), Deug (Drosophila eugracilis), Dbia (Drosophila biarmipes), Emex (Eufriesea mexicana), Fari (Fopius arisanus), Harm (Helicoverpa armigera), Hlab (Habropoda laboriosa), Lcup (Lucilia cuprina), Mdem (Microplitis demolitor), Ldec (Leptinotarsa decemlineata), Mdom (Musca domestica), Mrot (Megachile rotundata), Mpha (Monomorium pharaonis), Nlec (Neodiprion lecontei), Nvit (Nasonia vitripennis), Nlug (Nilaparvata lugens), Nves (Nicrophorus vespilloides), Oabi (Orussus abietinus), Otau (Onthophagus taurus) Prap (Pieris rapae), Pcan (Polistes canadensis), Pdom (Polistes dominula), Pgra (Pseudomyrmex gracilis), Scal (Stomoxys calcitrans) Slit (Spodoptera litura), Tcas (Tribolium castaneum), Vtam (Vanessa tameamea), Tni (Trichoplusia ni), Waur (Wasmannia auropunctata), and Zcuc (Zeugodacus cucurbitae). Neighborhood joining method along with 1000 bootstraps was used to construct the tree.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of Tektin, and Tssk gene family of B. dorsalis and different insect species. I41 proteins of Tssk and 63 proteins of Tektin family were analyzed. Different colors indicate different orders of insects. Black color indicates B. dorsalis (A) mehroon (Diptera), blue (Coloeopltera), yellow (Lepidoptera), green (Hymenoptera), purple (Siphonaptera), and red (Blattodae). (B) Mehroon (Diptera), green (Hymenoptera), blue (Lepidopters), and orange (Coleoptera). Names of different insects are Aaeg (Aedes aegypti), Acer (Apis cerana), Agla (Anoplophora glabripennis), Amel (Apis mellifera), Apla (Agrilus planipennis), Aroz (Athalia rosae), Aver (Asbolus verrucosus), Bdor (Bactrocera dorsalis), Bimp (Bombus impatiens), Blat (Bactrocera latifrons), Bole (Bactrocera olea), Bter (Bombus terrestris), Bmor (Bombyx mori), Ccal (Ceratina calcarata), Ccap (Ceratitis capitata), Ccin (Cephus cinctus), Ccos (Cyphomyrmex costatus), Cfel (Ctenocephalides felis), Cflo (Camponotus floridanus) Clec (Cimex lectularius), Csec (Cryptotermes secundus), Dall (Diachasma alloeum), Dbip (Drosophila bipectinata), Dbus (Drosophila busckii), Dele (Drosophila elegans), Dere (Drosophila erecta), Deug (Drosophila eugracilis), Dfic (Drosophila ficusphila), Dgua (Drosophila guanche), Dhyd (Drosophila hydei), Dkik (Drosophila kikkawai), Dmir (Drosophila miranda), Dnav (Drosophila navojoa), Dobs (Drosophila obscura), Dqua (Drosophila guanche), Dnov (Dufourea novaeangliae), Drho (Drosophila rhopaloa), Dser (Drosophila serrata), Dsuz (Drosophila suzukii, Dtak (Drosophila takahashii), Dwil (Drosophila willistoni), Dobs (Drosophila obscura), Dpon (Dendroctonus ponderosae), Dser (Drosophila serrata), Dnav (Drosophila navojoa), Dalb (Aedes albopictus), Deug (Drosophila eugracilis), Dbia (Drosophila biarmipes), Emex (Eufriesea mexicana), Fari (Fopius arisanus), Harm (Helicoverpa armigera), Hlab (Habropoda laboriosa), Lcup (Lucilia cuprina), Mdem (Microplitis demolitor), Ldec (Leptinotarsa decemlineata), Mdom (Musca domestica), Mrot (Megachile rotundata), Mpha (Monomorium pharaonis), Nlec (Neodiprion lecontei), Nvit (Nasonia vitripennis), Nlug (Nilaparvata lugens), Nves (Nicrophorus vespilloides), Oabi (Orussus abietinus), Otau (Onthophagus taurus) Prap (Pieris rapae), Pcan (Polistes canadensis), Pdom (Polistes dominula), Pgra (Pseudomyrmex gracilis), Scal (Stomoxys calcitrans) Slit (Spodoptera litura), Tcas (Tribolium castaneum), Vtam (Vanessa tameamea), Tni (Trichoplusia ni), Waur (Wasmannia auropunctata), and Zcuc (Zeugodacus cucurbitae). Neighborhood joining method along with 1000 bootstraps was used to construct the tree.
Insects 10 00164 g001
Insects 10 00164 g002 550
Figure 2. Expression profiles of Tssk1 and Tektin1 at different developmental stages of B. dorsalis male insects. (A) Expression profiles of Tssk1 at different developmental stages. (B) Expression profiles of Tektin1 at different developmental stages. Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences (least significant difference) in one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Expression profiles of Tssk1 and Tektin1 at different developmental stages of B. dorsalis male insects. (A) Expression profiles of Tssk1 at different developmental stages. (B) Expression profiles of Tektin1 at different developmental stages. Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences (least significant difference) in one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (p < 0.05).
Insects 10 00164 g002
Insects 10 00164 g003 550
Figure 3. Expression profiles of two genes in different body tissues of B. dorsalis males. (A) Expression profiles of Tssk1 in different body tissues. (B) Expression profiles of Tektin1 in different body tissues. Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences (least significant difference) in one-way ANOVA at p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Expression profiles of two genes in different body tissues of B. dorsalis males. (A) Expression profiles of Tssk1 in different body tissues. (B) Expression profiles of Tektin1 in different body tissues. Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences (least significant difference) in one-way ANOVA at p < 0.05.
Insects 10 00164 g003
Insects 10 00164 g004 550
Figure 4. Gene silencing of Tssk1 and Tektin1 gene in males of B. dorsalis caused by oral feeding of different concentrations of their dsRNAs. The control was treated with ds-egfp. (A) Fold change in Tssk1 gene transcription. (B) Fold change in Tektin1 gene transcription. One-way ANOVA was used to analyze the results (p < 0.0001, Tukey test).
Figure 4. Gene silencing of Tssk1 and Tektin1 gene in males of B. dorsalis caused by oral feeding of different concentrations of their dsRNAs. The control was treated with ds-egfp. (A) Fold change in Tssk1 gene transcription. (B) Fold change in Tektin1 gene transcription. One-way ANOVA was used to analyze the results (p < 0.0001, Tukey test).
Insects 10 00164 g004
Insects 10 00164 g005 550
Figure 5. Gene silencing of Tssk1 and Tektin1 in testis of males of B. dorsalis caused by oral feeding of dsRNA at the concentration of 1000 ng/uL. The control was treated with ds-egfp. (A) Fold change in Tssk1 gene transcription. (B) Fold change in Tektin1 gene transcription. One-way ANOVA was used to analyze the results. * shows significant difference at p < 0.05.
Figure 5. Gene silencing of Tssk1 and Tektin1 in testis of males of B. dorsalis caused by oral feeding of dsRNA at the concentration of 1000 ng/uL. The control was treated with ds-egfp. (A) Fold change in Tssk1 gene transcription. (B) Fold change in Tektin1 gene transcription. One-way ANOVA was used to analyze the results. * shows significant difference at p < 0.05.
Insects 10 00164 g005
Insects 10 00164 g006 550
Figure 6. Reduced expression of Tssk1 and Tektin1 in testis have decreased the male fertility in B. dorsalis. (A) Average number of eggs laid per female per day after crossing with males treated with dsTssk1, dsTektin, and control (ds-egfp) group. (B) Average number of eggs hatched per day obtained from females crossed with dsTssk1-treated males, compared to control (ds-egfp) group. (C) Average number of eggs hatched per day obtained from females crossed with dsTektin1 treated males, compared to control (ds-egfp). (D) Accumulative eggs hatching rate. One-way ANOVA along with student T-test was used to analyze the effects of treatments (p < 0.05).
Figure 6. Reduced expression of Tssk1 and Tektin1 in testis have decreased the male fertility in B. dorsalis. (A) Average number of eggs laid per female per day after crossing with males treated with dsTssk1, dsTektin, and control (ds-egfp) group. (B) Average number of eggs hatched per day obtained from females crossed with dsTssk1-treated males, compared to control (ds-egfp) group. (C) Average number of eggs hatched per day obtained from females crossed with dsTektin1 treated males, compared to control (ds-egfp). (D) Accumulative eggs hatching rate. One-way ANOVA along with student T-test was used to analyze the effects of treatments (p < 0.05).
Insects 10 00164 g006
Insects 10 00164 g007 550
Figure 7. Reduced expressions of Tssk1 and Tektin1 in testis have affected the average number of spermatozoa. (A) Average number of spermatozoa in males treated with dsTssk1, compared to control (ds-egfp) group. (B) Average number of spermatozoa in males treated with dsTektin1, compared to control (ds-egfp) group. The data were analyzed using T-test. *** indicates p < 0.001.
Figure 7. Reduced expressions of Tssk1 and Tektin1 in testis have affected the average number of spermatozoa. (A) Average number of spermatozoa in males treated with dsTssk1, compared to control (ds-egfp) group. (B) Average number of spermatozoa in males treated with dsTektin1, compared to control (ds-egfp) group. The data were analyzed using T-test. *** indicates p < 0.001.
Insects 10 00164 g007
Insects 10 00164 g008 550
Figure 8. Reduced number of live sperms in the Tektin1 knockdown males (A) Percentage of live sperm significantly decreased in flies fed with dsTektin, compared to the control (ds-egfp) group. (B) Represents the percentage of live spermatozoa per male. Red indicates dead sperms; green indicates live sperms. One-way ANOVA, along with student t-test, was used to analyze the results. ** indicates p < 0.01.
Figure 8. Reduced number of live sperms in the Tektin1 knockdown males (A) Percentage of live sperm significantly decreased in flies fed with dsTektin, compared to the control (ds-egfp) group. (B) Represents the percentage of live spermatozoa per male. Red indicates dead sperms; green indicates live sperms. One-way ANOVA, along with student t-test, was used to analyze the results. ** indicates p < 0.01.
Insects 10 00164 g008
Table
Table 1. Primer used for gene expression analysis and RNA interference (RNAi).
Table 1. Primer used for gene expression analysis and RNA interference (RNAi).
Primer NamePrimer Sequences for qRT-PCR
Tssk1-FCTCCAATCGCCAACTGAATA
TSSK1-RATTTGTGTACGAAATCCGAG
Tektin1-FTGTGGATGAAACCAAAGACA
Tektin1-RCCAACGATTTCTCCTTCAGA
16S-FCTCGTCCAACCGTTCATACC
16S-RCTGACCTGCCCACTGAAGTT
Primer NamePrimer Sequence for dsRNA Synthesis
dstssk1-FGGATCCTAATACGACTCACTATAGGATCACCCAAACATCATACAGA
dstssk1-RGGATCCTAATACGACTCACTATAGGCAATTTCGGATCGTATGGC
dstektin1-FGGATCCTAATACGACTCACTATAGGAGACATGCAAAATCAAACGG
dstektin1-RGGATCCTAATACGACTCACTATAGGCGTGTAGCAAATAGCGTAAC
dsGFP-F GGATCCTAATACGACTCACTATAGGATACGGCGTGCAGTGCT
dsGFP-RGGATCCTAATACGACTCACTATAGGATGATCGCGCTTCTCG

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sohail, S.; Tariq, K.; Zheng, W.; Ali, M.W.; Peng, W.; Raza, M.F.; Zhang, H. RNAi-Mediated Knockdown of Tssk1 and Tektin1 Genes Impair Male Fertility in Bactrocera dorsalis. Insects 2019, 10, 164. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10060164

AMA Style

Sohail S, Tariq K, Zheng W, Ali MW, Peng W, Raza MF, Zhang H. RNAi-Mediated Knockdown of Tssk1 and Tektin1 Genes Impair Male Fertility in Bactrocera dorsalis. Insects. 2019; 10(6):164. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10060164

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sohail, Summar, Kaleem Tariq, Weiwei Zheng, Muhammad Waqar Ali, Wei Peng, Muhammad Fahim Raza, and Hongyu Zhang. 2019. "RNAi-Mediated Knockdown of Tssk1 and Tektin1 Genes Impair Male Fertility in Bactrocera dorsalis" Insects 10, no. 6: 164. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10060164

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop