Next Article in Journal
Tribological Investigation of Polymer Composite Dynamic Shaft Seals in Extraterrestrial Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Brake Wear Particles on Eukaryotic Cell Viability and Associated Oxidative Stress Responses
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigation of Tribological Performance of Ti:WS2/PFPE Composite Lubricating System Under Proton Radiation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Friction and Wear Properties of AgCuNi Alloy/Au-Electroplated Layer Sliding Electrical Contact Material

1
College of Agricultural Equipment Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471003, China
2
College of Mechatronics Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471003, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Tribology in Advanced Equipment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
4
China Academy of Space Technology (Xi’an), Xi’an 710100, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Lubricants 2024, 12(12), 450; https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants12120450
Submission received: 9 November 2024 / Revised: 11 December 2024 / Accepted: 12 December 2024 / Published: 16 December 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Space Tribology)

Abstract

:
Understanding the tribological properties of alloy-based sliding electrical contacts is crucial for both fundamental research and practical applications. Here, to explore the friction, wear, and contact resistance of a AgCuNi alloy/Au-electroplated layer during sliding, a ball-on-disk tribometer was coupled with a source meter. The experiments were conducted under various conditions including a current ranging from 0 to 1.0 A, a normal load ranging from 0.5 to 3.0 N, and a sliding speed of 40 mm/s. The results indicate that the wear of the friction pair is aggravated by both the current and the increase in the normal load. When the current was 0.5 A, the wear loss reached its lowest point. However, as the current increased from 0.5 A to 1.0 A, there was an intensification in Ag transfer from the alloy ball to the Au-electroplated layer, resulting in an increase in wear loss. Both the normal load and current have significant effects on both friction coefficient and contact resistance. The variation in contact resistance over time follows a similar pattern to that of the friction coefficient over time. The formation of a transfer film plays a crucial role in determining contact resistance, wear resistance, and friction coefficient. The experiment demonstrates that optimizing the normal load and current can adjust both the contact resistance and friction coefficient, thereby prolonging service life and ensuring the stability of contacts.

1. Introduction

With the rapid development of aerospace technology and industrial technology, the demand for conductive slip ring electrical contact materials is constantly increasing [1,2]. Sliding electrical contact usually refers to a sliding pair under the action of current [3,4,5], and the friction and wear of electrical contact materials under current (i.e., the friction behavior of a sliding pair under the influence of current) is the main problem that restricts the service performance of electrical contact materials [4,5,6,7]. The study of sliding electrical contact is directly related to the service life and stability of the corresponding friction pair components, being of great significance for improving the service life and reducing the failure of components.
In recent years, many scholars have carried out extensive research on the sliding electrical contact friction behavior in the abovementioned fields. Some scholars have taken the pantograph catenary of railway locomotives as the research object and studied the current-carrying friction properties of copper, carbon, and other related materials [8,9]. It has been found that the wear of materials is affected by current intensity, normal load, sliding speed, and other parameters, providing a scientific basis for reducing wear and improving the service life of components [10,11,12,13]. In the early stages of research, the brush was made up of bundles of copper wire [14,15,16,17]. In the later stages, brushes composed of graphite and other materials appeared [18,19,20]. With the development of science and technology, to improve the performance of the slip ring, metal was added to the brush material [21,22,23]. Therefore, some scholars have conducted research on the sliding electrical contact behavior of some materials, especially graphite, carbon, and copper. At the same time, some scholars have also carried out corresponding research from the perspective of design and processing [24,25,26,27].
Shobert’s research shows that slip ring materials are usually made of Au, Ag, or noble metal alloys [28,29,30,31]. Some scholars have studied the sliding electrical contact friction of slip rings composed of precious metals or precious metal alloys, such as AuAgCu, brass, and Au plating [32,33,34]. AgCuNi alloy is an excellent brush material with good wear resistance and conductivity, and it is widely used in spacecraft [35,36,37,38]. Studying the electrical friction behavior and mechanisms of workpieces with AgCuNi alloy is crucial for component design and application. However, there are few studies on the sliding electrical contact friction of AgCuNi alloy.
In this study, a self-made AgCuNi25-1 alloy was examined to reveal its friction and wear mechanisms, along with those of a Au-electroplated layer, providing a reference to improve the service life and reliability of conductive slip ring friction pairs. The AgCuNi25-1 alloy and Au-electroplated layer were used to carry out ball-on-disk reciprocating sliding friction tests in an atmospheric environment. By studying the effects of current and normal load on the contact resistance, friction, and wear behavior of the friction pair, the tribological behavior of the AgCuNi25-1 alloy and Au electroplated layer in the process of sliding electrical contact was revealed.

2. Experiments

2.1. Materials

A ball-on-disk reciprocating sliding tribometer (Bruker, Penang, Malaysia, UMT3) was used to measure the tribological performance of the alloy ball and Au-electroplated layer, and the system resistance was measured with a source meter (Keithley 2401,Shanghai, China) (Figure 1).
The material of the ball was a AgCuNi alloy (74% Ag, 25% Cu, and 1% Ni), with a diameter of 12.7 mm. The substrate of the disk was brass (62% Cu, 38% Zn), which was plated with Au using the electroplating method. The type of electroplated gold was hard gold (containing traces of cobalt), and nickel was used as an underplate for the gold layer. The dimensions of the disk were ϕ20 × 3 mm, the thickness of the Au-electroplated layer was 3 μm, and the surface roughness of the disk was 0.5 μm. The Vickers hardness of the alloy ball was 200 HV and that of the Au-electroplated disk was 180 HV.
The process used for plate friction pairs is Au plating on the surface of brass. Due to the bonding problem between brass and Au, the surface roughness value cannot be too low. This is caused by the processing technology, and the thickness of the Au coating is relatively large, which can to some extent reduce the impact of roughness on the test results.

2.2. Tests Set-Up and Procedure

Before the test, all tribo-pairs were fully rinsed with ethanol ultrasonically. The friction and electrical contact tests were conducted in a reciprocating mode, with the disk reciprocating with a stroke length of 5 mm. All the tests were conducted in an atmospheric environment at 25 °C (±1 °C) with a relative humidity of 38 ± 2%. The tribology and electrical contact tests were investigated under normal load values of 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 N and current values of 0, 0.5, and 1.0 A, and the sliding speed was 40 mm/s (the reciprocating frequency is 4 Hz). During the experiment, the change in the friction coefficient in the whole process of the friction pair was recorded by a tribometer, and the total resistance of the system was recorded by a source meter. Among them, the source meter provided voltage under a constant current mode (voltage is allowed to change with the change in contact resistance). The contact resistance value was calculated according to Ohm’s law through the measured current and voltage drop through the friction pair [34]. The two wires were, respectively, connected to the ball holder for fixing the sample alloy ball and the lower sample disk, as shown in Figure 1b.
During the experiment, the source meter outputted a constant current (direct current) to the system, and the total resistance of the system was obtained through the I–V curve. In the experiment process, the total resistance of the system was composed of wire resistance, ball holder resistance, and the contact resistance of the friction pair. Except for the contact resistance, the resistance of other parts was fixed. Therefore, in this study, the change in system resistance reflected the change in contact resistance. After the experiment, the electrical contact friction behavior of the friction pair was analyzed by means of white light interference profilometry. In addition, to ensure the repeatability of the measurements, all tests were repeated at least three times.

3. Results

3.1. Friction Coefficient

The corresponding friction coefficient of the friction pair under different normal loads and currents is shown in Figure 2. When the normal load was 0.5 N, 1.0 N, or 2.0 N, with the increase in time, the friction coefficient first increased, then decreased, and finally became stable. For the friction coefficient in the latter two cases, however, the sudden drop was less obvious and it fluctuated greatly after rising. When the normal load was 3.0 N, the characteristics of a sudden drop after the increase in the friction coefficient were not very obvious. The friction coefficient fluctuated greatly initially. With the increase in time, the fluctuation of the friction coefficient gradually decreased and became stable. At the same time, the maximum value of the friction coefficient initially gradually decreased with the increase in normal load. Specifically, for a normal load of 0.5 N, 1.0 N, 2.0 N, and 3.0 N, the maximum values of the friction coefficient were 1.0, 0.9, 0.8, and 0.75, respectively.
When the normal load was 0.5 N, Figure 2a shows the friction coefficients corresponding to different currents. In all cases, the friction coefficient presented the characteristics of a typical running-in curve—that is, the friction coefficient first increased, then suddenly decreased, and then became stable. However, when there was no current, the friction coefficient after stabilization was about 0.51, which was smaller than that with a current. In the cases with a current, although the friction coefficient showed a stable trend after a sudden drop, with the gradual increase in sliding duration, the friction coefficient tended to rise slowly at the final moment. When the normal load was 1.0 N, the corresponding friction coefficient under different currents is shown in Figure 2b, which is similar to the characteristic when the load is 0.5 N.
However, differing from a normal load of 0.5 N, with or without a current, with the gradual increase in time, the friction coefficient showed a slow upward trend right after the drop. When the normal load was 2.0 N, differing from the first two groups, the friction coefficient after stabilization was similar, about 0.65, whether there was a current or not. When the normal load was 3.0 N, the corresponding friction coefficient under different currents is shown in Figure 2d. Differing from the previous three groups, the variation law of this group of friction coefficients is not very obvious. With or without a current, the friction coefficient increased slightly at the initial time point, then decreased, and fluctuated around 0.70. With the increase in time, the fluctuation of the friction coefficient decreased gradually.

3.2. Electrical Contact Performance

The corresponding system resistance under different normal loads and currents is shown in Figure 3. It can be seen from the figure that no matter how large the normal load was, when the current was 0.5 A, the system resistance was greater than that when the current was 1.0 A, and the fluctuation range of the system resistance when the current was 0.5 A was larger than that when the current was 1.0 A.
For system with a small current (0.5 A), the variation in system resistance is not obvious. When the normal load was 0.5 N and 3.0 N, the system resistance increased slowly. When the normal load was 1.0 N and 2.0 N, the system resistance decreased slowly and finally became stable. When the current was 0.5 A, the fluctuation range of system resistance decreased gradually with the increase in normal load.
For system with a large current (1.0 A), the system resistance under different loads gradually decreases and flattens with the friction time, and the resistance of the system resistance increases with the increase in load. When the load is 0.5 N, 1.0 N and 2.0 N, the system resistance finally stabilizes at about 1.4 Ω with the increase in friction time. However, when the load is 3.0 N, the system resistance after stabilization is about 1.47 Ω.
Compared with the variation in friction coefficient, it is found that the change in system resistance with sliding duration is similar to that of friction coefficient, that is, it fluctuates greatly at the initial time. With the increase in sliding duration, the system resistance tends to be stable—that is, the contact resistance of the friction pair remains unchanged in the later period.

4. Discussion

4.1. Friction Coefficient and Transfer Film

To understand the variation law of the friction coefficient as depicted in Figure 2 and Figure 3, we examined the micromorphology of wear scars and wear tracks under corresponding conditions, as shown in Figure 4. When the normal load was 0.5 N, as shown in Figure 4a, a transfer film appeared on the alloy ball—that is, Au on the Au-electroplated layer was transferred to the alloy ball. At the same time, silver spots appeared on the transfer film, and narrow silver banded parts also appeared on the wear tracks—that is, during the reciprocating sliding process of the alloy ball and the Au-electroplated layer, wear debris dominated by Ag was generated on the Au-electroplated layer. With the accumulation of wear debris, this part of the wear debris gradually adhered to the Au transfer film of the alloy ball. When there was no current, the transfer film on the alloy ball was uniform and dense. When there was current, however, the transfer film on the alloy ball had several pits. Therefore, the friction coefficient without a current was lower than that with a current, and this result is similar to that of Grandin [14].
When the normal load was 1.0 N, the micro morphology characteristics of wear scars and wear tracks corresponding to different currents were similar to those when the normal load was 0.5 N, as shown in Figure 4b. Similarly, as shown in Figure 4e, from the profiles of the transfer film, for the transfer film formed by Au adhering to the alloy ball, it can be seen that the end part of the transfer film was smoother when there was no current than when there was a current. Therefore, when there was no current, the transfer film formed on the alloy ball was more uniform; this made the friction coefficient in the case of no current lower than that in the case of a current. However, the amount of Ag adhering to the transfer film was significantly greater than that when the normal load was 0.5 N. Therefore, when the normal load was 1.0 N, the friction coefficient after stabilization with or without a current was greater than that when the load was 0.5 N. At the same time, because of the accumulation of Ag on the transfer film and the widening of the silver band on the wear track compared with the normal load of 0.5 N, the friction coefficient after stabilization tended to rise slowly in the end when there was no current.
When the normal load was 2.0 N, it could be found that compared with a load of 0.5 N and 1.0 N, the width of the wear track and diameter of the wear scar increased with the increase in normal load, as shown in Figure 4c. In the case of no current, it can be observed that Au still existed in the transfer film formed on the alloy ball. In the case of a current being present, the transfer film was covered with a large amount of Ag, and the wear was more severe. Therefore, for the friction coefficient without a current, the initial time presents typical running-in characteristics. After the friction coefficient was stable, with the continuous increase in time, the friction coefficient increased sharply at the final time point, which was close to the stable friction coefficient with a current.
When the normal load was 3.0 N, the corresponding micromorphology of wear scars and wear tracks is shown in Figure 4d. It can be observed that there was no obvious difference between wear scars and wear tracks with or without a current, and there was less distribution of Au on the transfer film. Compared with the smaller normal load, the surface of the transfer film was uneven under a normal load of 3.0 N, as shown in Figure 4f.
From the above discussion, it can be seen that when the normal loads were 0.5 N, 1.0 N and 2.0 N, and there was no current, the friction coefficient after stabilization was lower than that with a current. The introduction of a current and the increase in normal load aggravate the wear of the friction pair. At the same time, this is consistent with the research conclusions of Grandin [13]—that is, the appearance and composition of the transfer film will be affected by the load and current, which in turn will also affect the friction coefficient.
Via the preliminary experiments involving a current-carrying friction test, it was found that both the friction test without a current and the current-carrying friction processes are accompanied by the generation of a transfer film. According to the results of the optical microscope shown in Figure 4a–d, it can be seen that there is a layer of golden transfer film on the surface of the alloy ball, and as the normal load increases, a larger area of silver transfer film gradually appears on the golden transfer film. The above pattern can be inferred from macroscopic experimental results showing that when the normal load is constant, with the increase in current, more silver is transferred to the alloy ball, and the transfer film gradually fails. When the current is constant, the larger the load, the more silver there is in the transfer film, and the friction film gradually fails. Based on this experimental pattern, taking the experimental conditions of a load of 0.5 N, a current of 0.5 A, a sliding speed of 40 mm/s, and a running-in time of 60 min as an example, the transfer film and wear marks were characterized. The results are shown in Figure 5a–d.
Based on these macroscopic observation results and EDS analysis, it can be concluded that the main component of the gold transfer film on the wear spot (balls) is Au, while the main element in the silver transfer film on the surface of the gold transfer film is Ag. The components of the experimental materials used in this study are as follows: ball friction pair (74% Ag, 25% Cu, 1% Ni), Au-plated plate, base brass (62% Cu, 38% Zn), surface Au-plated plate. There is no Ag on the surface of the Au-plated plate. At the beginning of the experiment, the Ag on the alloy ball is transferred to the Au-plated plate to form the wear debris, and the Au on the Au-plated plate is transferred to the surface of the alloy ball to form the Au transfer film. As the wear intensifies, the Ag on the Au-plated plate transfers to the Au transfer film of the alloy ball.
In this experiment, both the current and the load have an effect on the friction transfer film formation, and from the experimental results (Figure 2 and Figure 4), the load has a dominant role. When the load remains the same and the current increases (Figure 2a, when the current is 0.5 A), the friction pair will experience a longer running-in time to form a relatively stable transfer film, and the friction coefficient will decrease. When the current is large enough, the formation of transfer film is accelerated, and the friction pair quickly displays a stable friction coefficient. When the current is constant and the load increases, the failure of the transfer film will be aggravated. When the load is sufficiently large, such as 3 N, increasing the current does not cause significant differences in the friction performance.
It can be concluded that the failure of the transfer film will cause a change in the friction coefficient. Therefore, the analysis of the friction coefficient can reflect the change rule of the transfer film from the beginning to the stable formation to the failure of the transfer film to a certain extent, and the fluctuation degree of the friction coefficient can reflect the evolution process of the transfer film.

4.2. Wear Loss

The friction coefficient after stabilization and the wear loss of the plate corresponding to different loads and currents are shown in Figure 6. Under the condition of no current, the friction coefficient after stabilization gradually increases with the increase in load. This is because under a load of 0.5 N and no current, the transfer film on the alloy ball is the most dense and uniform, while the Ag element adhering to the transfer film is the least, resulting in the lowest friction coefficient after stabilization under this condition. According to the analysis in Figure 4, under the conditions of 0.5 N normal load and no current, the transfer film on the alloy ball is the most dense and uniform, while the Ag element adhered to the transfer film is the least, meaning that the friction coefficient after stabilization is the lowest under this condition. When the normal load is 0.5 N and 1.0 N and a current is applied, the friction coefficient after stabilization is greater than that without a current. When the normal load is 2.0 N and 3.0 N, due to the failure of the transfer film on the alloy ball, there are no significant differences in the stable friction coefficient with or without a current.
As the normal load increases, the wear loss increases with or without a current. From Figure 6a–c, it can be seen that under a normal load of 0.5 N, 1.0 N and 2.0 N, when the current is 0.5 A, the transfer film does not disappear, and the corresponding wear loss is the lowest, which indicates that the anti-wear effect of the material is better when the current is 0.5 A. During the process of loading from 0.5 N to 3.0 N, as the current increases from 0 A to 0.5 A, a decrease in wear loss is observed. This is due to the application of an electric current. In the process of friction shear, a large amount of abrasive particles are accumulated, which causes the shear resistance to increase, so the friction coefficient is high. However, the accumulated abrasive particles rapidly form a transfer film under continuous current and shear, and a solid friction transfer film is formed between the two contact surfaces. At this time, the transfer film is stably formed, and during the subsequent experiments, wear occurs on the transfer film, which protects the friction pair to a certain extent, so the wear loss of the contact surface is reduced.
As the current increases from 0.5 A to 1.0 A, the wear loss increases. This is because with the increase in current, the possible Joule heat also increases [13]. Under the joint action of current and machinery, the wear loss increases. From Figure 4a–d, it can be seen that when the current is 0.5 A, the content of Ag on the wear track is less than that when the current is 1.0 A, which indicates that the increase in current intensifies the transfer of Ag on the alloy ball to the Au-electroplated layer. The increase in Ag content on the Au-electroplated layer leads to the increase in Ag content adhering to the transfer film, which intensifies the wear loss. When the normal load is 3.0 N, due to the intensification of wear, more grooves appear on the transfer film, and the Au-electroplated layer on the plate basically fails. Therefore, under this load condition, the change in wear with current has no obvious law.

4.3. Contact Resistance

Contact resistance is one of the common indicators used to reflect the electrical contact performance [39], which includes constriction resistance and a film resistance [35]. The detection of contact resistance can reflect the wear of friction pairs to a certain extent [36]. In this test system, the current is generated by the source meter and passes through the wire, ball holder, alloy ball, and Au-plated plate. Therefore, in this testing system, the resistance values of the wire and ball holder remain constant during testing. The sliding friction between the alloy ball and the Au-plated plate causes changes in the contact point, which in turn causes changes in the resistance of the ball–plate contact pair, resulting in changes in the resistance value of the testing system. Therefore, the change in the resistance value of the testing system can reflect the change in resistance of the ball–plate contact pair—that is, the change in contact resistance.
As shown in Figure 3, under lower loads, the transfer film can be densely formed with a larger contact area and lower contact resistance. As the load increases to 3 N, the Au-plated plate in the friction pair has already experienced the failure of the Au plating layer. At this time, friction occurs on the substrate and steel ball, and the transfer film changes from a uniformly dense Au-based to a Ag-based transfer film. Therefore, it leads to significant wear on the contact surface, and the contact elements are the brass substrate and Ag, resulting in very high contact resistance under 3 N.
It can be seen from Figure 2 and Figure 3 (when the current is 1.0 A) that the friction coefficient and resistance fluctuate greatly at the initial time point, and then gradually become stable. So, the variation law of the friction coefficient with time is similar to that of contact resistance with time. Therefore, there is a certain correlation between the contact resistance and friction coefficient between the AgCuNi alloy and the Au-electroplated layer, which is similar to the test results of Beake [37]. To further explore the relationship between friction coefficient and contact resistance, their variation in relation to time with current being 1.0 A is shown in Figure 7.
From Figure 7a, it can be seen that when the normal load is 0.5 N, the system resistance rapidly decreases to the lowest value at 700 s, about 1.38 Ω, and then remains stable, so the contact resistance decreases rapidly from the maximum value to the minimum value at about 700 s with the increase in time, and then remains stable. At the same time, the variation law of the friction coefficient with time is similar. At the initial moment, the friction coefficient increases from low to high. At about 700 s, the friction coefficient decreases to its minimum with the formation of a dense and uniform transfer film. At about 2800 s, with the accumulation of wear debris gradually adhering to the transfer film of the alloy ball, the friction coefficient begins to rise slowly, and the contact resistance fluctuates greatly. At the initial time point, due to the contact between the alloy ball and the plate, the contact area is small. With the reciprocating sliding of the friction pair and the running-in of the friction pair, the transfer film on the alloy ball gradually forms, which makes the contact area between the ball and the plate larger, so the conductive area increases [34], while the contact resistance decreases to the minimum value and remains constant. Due to the accumulation and adhesion of wear debris on the transfer film in the later stage, the contact area changes and the contact resistance fluctuates.
When the normal load is 1.0 N and 2.0 N, as shown in Figure 7b,c, the change law of friction coefficient and contact resistance is basically the same. Similarly, the contact resistance changes due to the change in the transfer film.
When the normal load is 3.0 N, as shown in Figure 7d, the friction coefficient does not rise at first and then decreases at the initial time point, but then directly decreases at about 100 s and then rises slowly. This is due to the rapid formation of a transfer film at 3.0 N. However, because of the high contact stress, serious wear, and more wear debris being produced, the transfer film breaks rapidly due to the adhesion of the wear debris after the formation of the transfer film, meaning that the friction coefficient increases slowly after decreasing. At about 500 s, the friction coefficient remains basically stable and fluctuates slightly. Similarly, the contact resistance also tends to rise slowly after 100 s, rather than continuing to decline. This is due to the rupturing of the transfer film, the plastic deformation of the transfer film, and the formation of pits and grooves on its surface, which reduces the contact area and increases the contact resistance. With the accumulation of wear debris, the contact area increases, the conductive area increases, and the contact resistance decreases, after which it finally fluctuates around 1.47 Ω.
As shown in Figure 7, at the beginning of the friction process, the contact resistance suddenly decreases from a larger value and then tends to stabilize. This indicates that at the beginning of the friction process, the two friction pairs are in the running-in process, and the transfer film has not yet formed. The contact surface between the two friction pairs is a rough peak contact with a small contact area, resulting in a higher contact resistance value. As the running-in process progresses, a transfer film gradually forms, and the contact area between the two friction pairs changes from rough peak contact to a uniform and dense transfer film. Therefore, the contact area increases, while the contact resistance decreases and then stabilizes.
It can be seen from the above discussion that, consistent with the research conclusions of Grandin [39] and Jacobson [38], the normal load and current have significant effects on the friction coefficient and contact resistance. The contact resistance is closely related to the contact surface area of the friction pair. At the same time, the friction coefficient is related to the contact area between the two friction pairs. Therefore, the changing trend of the contact resistance is related to the changing law of the friction coefficient. So, the change in contact resistance can directly reflect the formation of a transfer film, while the friction coefficient is the experimental result of the whole system, which cannot directly reflect the formation process of the transfer film. The transfer film determines not only the contact resistance but also the wear resistance and friction coefficient.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, the friction and electrical contact characteristics of a AgCuNi alloy and a Au-electroplated layer under normal load and current were studied. By comparing the friction, wear, and contact resistance under different loads and currents, the following conclusions are obtained:
(1)
When the normal load is less than 3 N and there is no current, the friction coefficient after stabilization is lower than that with a current, and the introduction of a current and the increase in the normal load aggravate the wear of the friction pair.
(2)
Both current and load have an effect on the friction transfer film formation, and the load has a dominant role. When the load is sufficiently large, increasing the current does not cause significant differences in the friction performance.
(3)
When the current is about 1.0 A, there is a certain correlation between the contact resistance and friction coefficient between the AgCuNi alloy and the Au-electroplated layer. The variation law of contact resistance with time is similar to that of the friction coefficient with time.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Z.; Software, H.W. and H.L.; Validation, H.C.; Formal analysis, Q.J.; Investigation, H.W., H.C., H.L. and M.M.; Resources, Y.Z.; Data curation, H.W. and Y.Z.; Writing—original draft, H.W., H.L. and M.M.; Funding acquisition, Y.Z. and M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the State Administration of Science, Technology and Industry for National Defense, PRC (No. B0203), the Science and Technology Research and Development Program Project of Henan Province (No. 242102110362), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52305190), the Science and Technology Research and Development Program Project of Henan Province (No. 242102221007), and the 3rd HeLuo Youth Talent Nurturing Engineering Project (No. 2024HLTJ06).

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude for the financial support provided by State Administration of Science, Technology and Industry for National Defense, PRC, project No. B0203 and the Reliability Improvement and Verification Project for Slip Ring Instantaneous Breaking Problem of China Academy of Space Technology (Xi’an).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ma, Y.; Lei, Q.; Cheng, J.; Gao, Y.; Meng, X.; Agbedor, S.-O.; Xiao, Z. Microstructure and properties of a Cu-6Cr alloy with high friction and wear resistance. Wear Int. J. Sci. Technol. Friction. Lubr. Wear 2023, 2, 514–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Huang, W.; Yu, H.; Wang, L.; Wu, X.; Ouyang, C.; Zhang, Y.; He, J. State of the art and prospects in sliver- and copper-matrix composite electrical contact materials. Mater. Today Commun. 2023, 37, 107256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Huang, S.; Feng, Y.; Liu, H.; Ding, K.; Qian, G. Electrical sliding friction and wear properties of Cu–MoS2–graphite–WS2 nanotubes composites in air and vacuum conditions. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2013, 560, 685–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wu, T.; Chen, W.; Wangye, L.; Wang, Y.; Wu, Z.; Ma, M.; Zheng, Q. Ultrahigh Critical Current Density across Sliding Electrical Contacts in Structural Superlubric State. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2024, 132, 096201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhou, T.; Wang, X.; Qin, L.-X.; Qiu, W.-T.; Li, S.-F.; Jiang, Y.-B.; Jia, Y.-L.; Li, Z. Electrical sliding friction wear behaviors and mechanisms of Cu–Sn matrix composites containing MoS2/graphite. Wear 2024, 548, 205388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. McNab, I. Recent advances in electrical current collection. Wear 1980, 59, 259–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sun, Y.; Li, J.; Yang, H.; Kang, X.; Zhang, L. Effect of electric current on the microstructural evolution and tribological behavior of highly oriented pyrolytic graphite. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 7283–7294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kubota, Y.; Nagasaka, S.; Miyauchi, T.; Yamashita, C.; Kakishima, H. Sliding wear behavior of copper alloy impregnated C/C composites under an electrical current. Wear 2013, 302, 1492–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, P.; Zhang, H.; Yin, J.; Xiong, X.; Tan, C.; Deng, C.; Yan, Z. Wear and friction behaviours of copper mesh and flaky graphite- modified carbon/carbon composite for sliding contact material under electric current. Wear 2017, 380, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Senouci, A.; Frene, J.; Zaidi, H. Wear mechanism in graphite–copper electrical sliding contact. Wear 1999, 225–229, 949–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Poljanec, D.; Kalin, M.; Kumar, L. Influence of contact parameters on the tribological behaviour of various graphite/graphite sliding electrical contacts. Wear 2018, 406, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Robert, F.; Csapo, E.; Zaïdi, H.; Paulmier, D. Influence of the current and environment on the superficial structure of a graphite electrical collector. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 1995, 35, 259–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Paulmier, D.; El Mansori, M.; Zaïdi, H. Study of magnetized or electrical sliding contact of a steel XC48/graphite couple. Wear 1997, 203, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Grandin, M.; Wiklund, U. Wear phenomena and tribofilm formation of copper/copper-graphite sliding electrical contact materials. Wear 2018, 398, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yasar, I.; Canakci, A.; Arslan, F. The effect of brush spring pressure on the wear behaviour of copper–graphite brushes with electrical current. Tribol. Int. 2007, 40, 1381–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lin, X.-Z.; Zhu, M.-H.; Mo, J.-L.; Chen, G.-X.; Jin, X.-S.; Zhou, Z.-R. Tribological and electric-arc behaviors of carbon/copper pair during sliding friction process with electric current applied. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2011, 21, 292–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Toth, G.; Mäklin, J.; Halonen, N.; Palosaari, J.; Juuti, J.; Jantunen, H.; Kordas, K.; Sawyer, W.G.; Vajtai, R.; Ajayan, P.M. Carbon-Nanotube-Based Electrical Brush Contacts. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 2054–2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zeng, Y.; He, F.; Wang, Q.; Yan, X.; Xie, G. Friction and wear behaviors of molybdenum disulfide nanosheets under normal electric field. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 455, 527–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pittala, R.K.; Sharma, P.; Anne, G.; Patil, S.; Varghese, V.; Das, S.R.; Kumar, C.S.; Fernandes, F. Development and Mechanical Characterization of Ni-Cr Alloy Foam Using Ultrasonic-Assisted Electroplating Coating Technique. Coatings 2023, 13, 1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jena, P.C.; Pradhan, B.; Das, S.R.; Dhupal, D. Experimental Investigation on ECMM with Nimonic 75 Alloy for Prosthetic Component. In Design, Development, and Optimization of Bio-Mechatronic Engineering Products; Kaushik Kumar, J., Davim, P., Eds.; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2019; Chapter 6; ISBN 9781522582359. [Google Scholar]
  21. Mahapatra, S.; Das, A.; Jena, P.C.; Das, S.R. Turning of hardened AISI H13 steel with recently developed S3P-AlTiSiN coated carbide tool using MWCNT mixed nanofluid under minimum quantity lubrication. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2023, 237, 843–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Barsarani, P.; Pankaj, C.J.; Dhupal, D. Design, Development, and Optimization of Bio-Mechatronic Engineering Products: Chapter-10: Modeling and Numerical analysis of advanced Machining for Orthotic Compo-nents (300818-053554). In Design, Development, and Optimization of Bio-Mechatronic Engineering Products; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2019; Chapter 6; ISBN 9781522582359. [Google Scholar]
  23. Pradhan, S.; Das, S.R.; Jena, P.C.; Dhupal, D. Investigations on Surface Integrity in Hard Turning of Functionally Graded Specimen under Nano Fluid Assisted Minimum Quantity Lubrication. Adv. Mater. Process. Technol. 2021, 8, 1714–1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jena, J.; Panda, A.; Behera, A.K.; Jena, P.C.; Das, S.R.; Dhupal, D. Modeling and optimization of surface roughness in hard turning of AISI 4340 steel with coated ceramic tool. In Innovation in Materials Science and Engineering: Proceedings of ICEMIT 2017; Springer: Singapore, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  25. Das, S.R.; Jena, P.C.; Behura, A.K.; Nayak, R.P. Experimental investigation and modelling of cutting parameters on surface finish during machining of hardened AISI 4340 steel using coated carbide insert. In Proceedings of the 4th International & 25th All India Manufacturing Technology, Design and Research Conference (AIMTDR 2012), Kolkata, India, 14 December 2014. [Google Scholar]
  26. Deepak, B.B.V.L.; Parhi, D.R.K.; Biswal, B.B.; Jena, P.C. Applications of Computational Methods in Manufacturing and Product Design. 2021. Available online: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-19-0296-3 (accessed on 27 October 2024).
  27. Deepak, B.B.V.L.; Parhi, D.; Jena, P.C. Innovative Product Design and Intelligent Manufacturing Systems: Select Proceedings of ICIPDIMS 2019; Springer: Singapore, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  28. Shobert, E.I. Carbon Brushes, The Physics and Chemistry of Sliding Contacts; Chemical Publishing Company Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1965. [Google Scholar]
  29. Goodman, S.J.; Page, T.F. The contact resistance and wear behaviour of separable electrical contact materials. Wear 1989, 131, 177–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xie, X.-L.; Zhang, L.; Xiao, J.-K.; Qian, Z.-Y.; Zhang, T.; Zhou, K.-C. Sliding electrical contact behavior of AuAgCu brush on Au plating. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2015, 25, 3029–3036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xiao, J.-K.; Liu, L.-M.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, K.-C. Sliding electrical contact behavior of brass fiber brush against coin-silver and Au plating. Wear 2016, 368–369, 461–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lu, S.P.; Yang, H.M.; Yang, F.T.; Yu, J.S.; Liu, Q.; Wang, J. The Effect of Zn on the Properties of AgCuNi4–0.5 Alloy. Precious Met. 2013, 34, 21–24. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  33. Wei, M.X.; Liu, Q.; Gao, Q.Q.; Zhao, T.M.; Zheng, X.Y.; Long, X.Q.; Xie, M.; Chen, Y.T. Study the Influence of Rare Earth Elements on Microstructure and Property of AgCuNi Alloy. Precious Met. 2019, 40, 31–34. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  34. Argibay, N.; Sawyer, W.G. Low wear metal sliding electrical contacts at high current density. Wear 2012, 274–275, 229–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Holm, R. Electric Contacts, Theory and Applications, 4th ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1967. [Google Scholar]
  36. Echeverrigaray, F.; de Mello, S.; Leidens, L.; Boeira, C.; Michels, A.; Braceras, I.; Figueroa, C. Electrical contact resistance and tribological behaviors of self-lubricated dielectric coating under different conditions. Tribol. Int. 2020, 143, 106086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Beake, B.D.; Harris, A.J.; Liskiewicz, T.W.; Wagner, J.; McMaster, S.J.; Goodes, S.R.; Neville, A.; Zhang, L. Friction and electrical contact resistance in reciprocating nano-scale wear testing of metallic materials. Wear 2021, 474–475, 203866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jacobson, S.; Hogmark, S. Tribofilms—On the Crucial Importance of Tribologically Induced Surface Modifications; Research Signpost: Trivandrum, India, 2010; pp. 197–225. [Google Scholar]
  39. Grandin, M.; Wiklund, U. Friction, wear and tribofilm formation on electrical contact materials in reciprocating sliding against silver-graphite. Wear 2013, 302, 1481–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram and the experimental device: (a) schematic diagram; (b) experimental device.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram and the experimental device: (a) schematic diagram; (b) experimental device.
Lubricants 12 00450 g001
Figure 2. Variation in friction coefficient with time under different loads and currents: (a) Friction coefficient under different currents at 0.5 N load; (b) Friction coefficient under different currents at 1.0 N load; (c) Friction coefficient under different currents at 2.0 N load; (d) Friction coefficient under different currents at 3.0 N load.
Figure 2. Variation in friction coefficient with time under different loads and currents: (a) Friction coefficient under different currents at 0.5 N load; (b) Friction coefficient under different currents at 1.0 N load; (c) Friction coefficient under different currents at 2.0 N load; (d) Friction coefficient under different currents at 3.0 N load.
Lubricants 12 00450 g002
Figure 3. Variation in resistance with time under different normal loads and currents: (a) Resistance under different loads at 0.5 A; (b) Resistance under different loads at 1.0 A.
Figure 3. Variation in resistance with time under different normal loads and currents: (a) Resistance under different loads at 0.5 A; (b) Resistance under different loads at 1.0 A.
Lubricants 12 00450 g003
Figure 4. Three-dimensional optical micrograph images and profiles of wear scars under different normal loads and currents for the wear scars of the ball and wear tracks on the plate: (ad) different normal loads and currents; (e,f) three-dimensional optical micrograph images and profiles of wear scars under normal loads of 0.5 N and 3.0 N at different currents.
Figure 4. Three-dimensional optical micrograph images and profiles of wear scars under different normal loads and currents for the wear scars of the ball and wear tracks on the plate: (ad) different normal loads and currents; (e,f) three-dimensional optical micrograph images and profiles of wear scars under normal loads of 0.5 N and 3.0 N at different currents.
Lubricants 12 00450 g004aLubricants 12 00450 g004bLubricants 12 00450 g004c
Figure 5. Composition of transfer film and wear marks. (a) EDS diagram of the plate; (b) elemental analysis diagram of the plate; (c) EDS diagram of the ball; (d) elemental analysis diagram of the ball.
Figure 5. Composition of transfer film and wear marks. (a) EDS diagram of the plate; (b) elemental analysis diagram of the plate; (c) EDS diagram of the ball; (d) elemental analysis diagram of the ball.
Lubricants 12 00450 g005aLubricants 12 00450 g005b
Figure 6. Friction coefficient and wear loss of the plate under different normal loads and currents: (a) 0.5 N; (b) 1.0 N; (c) 2.0 N; (d) 3.0 N.
Figure 6. Friction coefficient and wear loss of the plate under different normal loads and currents: (a) 0.5 N; (b) 1.0 N; (c) 2.0 N; (d) 3.0 N.
Lubricants 12 00450 g006
Figure 7. Friction coefficient (black curve) and resistance (red curve) under different normal loads: (a) 0.5 N; (b) 1.0 N; (c) 2.0 N; (d) 3.0 N.
Figure 7. Friction coefficient (black curve) and resistance (red curve) under different normal loads: (a) 0.5 N; (b) 1.0 N; (c) 2.0 N; (d) 3.0 N.
Lubricants 12 00450 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, H.; Li, H.; Jia, Q.; Ma, M. Friction and Wear Properties of AgCuNi Alloy/Au-Electroplated Layer Sliding Electrical Contact Material. Lubricants 2024, 12, 450. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants12120450

AMA Style

Wu H, Zhang Y, Cao H, Li H, Jia Q, Ma M. Friction and Wear Properties of AgCuNi Alloy/Au-Electroplated Layer Sliding Electrical Contact Material. Lubricants. 2024; 12(12):450. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants12120450

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Hongjian, Yanan Zhang, Hui Cao, Han Li, Qingjian Jia, and Ming Ma. 2024. "Friction and Wear Properties of AgCuNi Alloy/Au-Electroplated Layer Sliding Electrical Contact Material" Lubricants 12, no. 12: 450. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants12120450

APA Style

Wu, H., Zhang, Y., Cao, H., Li, H., Jia, Q., & Ma, M. (2024). Friction and Wear Properties of AgCuNi Alloy/Au-Electroplated Layer Sliding Electrical Contact Material. Lubricants, 12(12), 450. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants12120450

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop