Next Article in Journal
Addendum: Cohen, M.H. OJ 287 as a Rotating Helix. Galaxies 2017, 5, 12
Next Article in Special Issue
Sliding along the Eddington Limit—Heavy-Weight Central Stars of Planetary Nebulae
Previous Article in Journal
Probing Black Hole Magnetic Fields with QED
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Planets, Planetary Nebulae, and Intermediate Luminosity Optical Transients (ILOTs)

1
Department of Physics, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel
2
Guangdong Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Shantou 515069, China
Galaxies 2018, 6(2), 58; https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies6020058
Submission received: 16 April 2018 / Revised: 24 May 2018 / Accepted: 24 May 2018 / Published: 28 May 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Asymmetric Planetary Nebulae VII)

Abstract

:
I review some aspects related to the influence of planets on the evolution of stars before and beyond the main sequence. Some processes include the tidal destruction of a planet on to a very young main sequence star, on to a low-mass main sequence star, and on to a brown dwarf. This process releases gravitational energy that might be observed as a faint intermediate luminosity optical transient (ILOT) event. I then summarize the view that some elliptical planetary nebulae are shaped by planets. When the planet interacts with a low-mass, upper asymptotic giant branch (AGB) star, it both enhances the mass-loss rate and shapes the wind to form an elliptical planetary nebula, mainly by spinning up the envelope and by exciting waves in the envelope. If no interaction with a companion, stellar or substellar, takes place beyond the main sequence, the star is termed a Jsolated star, and its mass-loss rates on the giant branches are likely to be much lower than what is traditionally assumed.

1. Introduction

Planetary nebulae (PNe) can be shaped by stellar and substellar companions (see Jones & Boffin 2017 for a recent review [1]). One open question that has been with us for more than two decades (e.g., Soker 1996 [2]) is to what extent substellar objects, and in particular, planets, also shape PNe (see De Marco & Izzard 2017 for a recent review [3]). De Marco & Soker [4] took that about one-quarter of all stars in the initial mass range 1 8 M do form PNe, and estimate that about 20% of all PNe were shaped via planets and brown dwarfs. This amounts to about 5% of all 1 8 M stars. In light of the general interest in the manner by which planets can influence stellar evolution (e.g., [5,6,7,8,9,10]), I discuss some issues related to star–planet interaction. The paper is based on a talk I gave at the Asymmetrical Planetary Nebulae (APN) VII meeting (Hong Kong, December 2017), and all figures are from my presentation at the meeting.

2. Engulfment of Planets by Asymptotic Giant Branch (AGB) Stars

For a planet to influence the envelope of an asymptotic giant branch (AGB) star, the envelope cannot be too massive. This implies a low-mass star. However, for traditionally used mass-loss rates, low-mass stars reach very large radii already on their red giant branch (RGB; Figure 1 [11]) and are likely to swallow close planets before they even reach the AGB. The way to have planets interact with their host star on the AGB is if the mass-loss rate on the giant branches is lower than what traditional values are. In that case, the stellar core on the AGB and consequently the stellar radius are larger than in standard theoretical calculations, and the star is much more likely to swallow a planet on its upper AGB. Sabach & Soker [12,13] assume that Jsolated stars, i.e., those that are not spun up in their post-main-sequence evolution, lose mass at a rate that is less than about one-third of the traditional one (for justification see [12]). They then show that in that case, low-mass AGB stars reach much larger radii and are much more likely to swallow planets than in standard theoretical calculations. The assumption of lower mass-loss rates of Jsolated stars needs further examination by future observations and theoretical studies.

3. The Fate of a Planet: Tidal Destruction versus Engulfment

The fate of the planet as it comes close to the envelope of a star depends on the density ratio. If the density of the planet is larger than that of the star, it dives in to the envelope as one entity and starts a common envelope evolution [14,15]. It will later be destroyed near the core by either tidal forces or evaporation. Light planets are evaporated before they reach the core. Planets that are more massive can reach closer to the core and then suffer tidal destruction with part of their material accreted onto the core (marked “destruction on core” in Figure 3). If the density of the planet is lower than that of the star, it is tidally destroyed and forms an accretion belt (or a disk) around the star. In Figure 2, I present a schematic evolution of the planet and the stellar radii and densities, and mark which of the two outcomes takes place. I give more details of the outcomes in Figure 3.

4. Intermediate Luminosity Optical Transients (ILOTs) with Planets

ILOTs are outbursts of a star or a binary system with a peak luminosity mostly between those of novae and supernovae (other names for these events are red novae, luminous red novae, and intermediate luminous red transients). Several studies have proposed that the interaction of a planet with a star can account for a minority of ILOTs. Retter & Marom (2003 [16]) proposed that V838 Mon was a result of planets entering a common envelope with a star. Bear et al. (2011 [17]) proposed that the destruction of a planet by a brown dwarf or a low-mass main sequence star can result in an ILOT event. Kashi & Soker (2017 [18]) proposed that the outburst of the young stellar object ASASSN-15qi was an ILOT event where a sub-Jupiter young planet was tidally destroyed by a young main sequence star. Because the system was young, the density of the planet was smaller than that of the star (Figure 3) and the planet was tidally destroyed. This, they suggested, resulted in the formation of an accretion disc and a gravitationally powered ILOT. The mass of the planet was too small to inflate a giant envelope and hence the ILOT was hot, rather than red. As well, its energy was below that of classical novae.
Bear et al. (2013 [19]) discussed the possibility of observing the transient event that might result from the tidal destruction process of an asteroid near a WD. However, this event is much weaker than typical ILOTs.

5. Intermediate Luminosity Optical Transients (ILOTs)

In Figure 4, I present the energy–time diagram of ILOTs that Amit Kashi and I have been developing in the last several years (see http://phsites.technion.ac.il/soker/ilot-club/ for an updated diagram).
We suggest ([18] and references therein) that these ILOTs are powered by gravitational energy in one of several types of processes: (1) The secondary star is completely destroyed and part of its mass is accreted onto the primary star, e.g., as a planet destruction onto a brown dwarf; (2) the secondary star enters the envelope of a companion but stays intact and forms a common envelope, e.g., as Retter & Marom (2003 [16]) suggested; (3) the secondary star accretes mass while outside the envelope of the primary star, e.g., as in our model for the Great Eruption of Eta Carinae or our suggested scenario for some PNe [18].
With Amit Kashi [20], we suggest that the binary progenitors of some bipolar PNe experienced ILOT events that shaped the PN. The several-months-long to several-years-long outbursts were powered by mass transfer from an AGB star onto a main sequence companion that orbits outside the AGB envelope. Jets launched by an accretion disk around the main sequence companion shaped the bipolar lobes. Four such bipolar PNe are marked on Figure 4. They are marked with a long horizontal line because we know more or less the kinetic energy of the nebulae, which is about the same as the ILOT energy, but we cannot tell how long the mass ejection phase lasted.

6. Planet-Shaped Planetary Nebulae

When a planet spirals in inside the loosely bound envelope of an upper AGB star, it can excite waves in the envelope and spin up the envelope, both of which can cause asymmetrical mass loss. Finally, when the planet is destroyed near the core, it might lead to further asymmetrical mass loss from inside the envelope, e.g., jets that might be launched by the core. For example, a Jupiter-like planet might form a disk that launches jets with about a few percent of the mass of the planet. This amounts to the jets’ mass of about few × 10 5 M . This mass is sufficient to form two opposite bullets (‘ansae’) along the symmetry axis of the nebula.
I started the paper with the discussion of the general interaction of planets with evolving stars, I then moved to discuss the formation of ILOTs with planet companions, and in Section 5, I mentioned some bipolar PNe that can be shaped by ILOT events with a stellar companion to the AGB progenitor of the PN. I now end the discussion of planet-shaped PNe by listing the evolutionary channels and the resulting PN types. For that I use a table from De Marco & Soker (2011 [4]), which I present here as Figure 5.

7. Discussion

I discussed some aspects of the influence of planets on late stellar evolution and its relation to some aspects of stellar binary interaction. The main claim of this presentation is that planets can influence the evolution of low-mass stars in, e.g., enhancing the mass-loss rate of RGB and AGB stars (that without any companion are Jsolated stars that have low mass-loss rates, lower than what is usually assumed), forming some ILOTs, and shaping PNe. There are other aspects I did not get into, such as the strength of the tidal interaction between the planet and the star, some aspects of which can be found in reviews from earlier related meetings (e.g., [21,22]).

Acknowledgments

I thank the referees for useful comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jones, D.; Boffin, H.M.J. Binary stars as the key to understanding planetary nebulae. Nat. Astron. 2017, 1, 0117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Soker, N. What Planetary Nebulae Can Tell Us about Planetary Systems. Astrophys. J. Lett. 1996, 460, L53–L56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. De Marco, O.; Izzard, R.G. Dawes Review 6: The Impact of Companions on Stellar Evolution. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 2017, 34, e001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. De Marco, O.; Soker, N. The Role of Planets in Shaping Planetary Nebulae. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 2011, 123, 402–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nordhaus, J.; Spiegel, D.S. On the orbits of low-mass companions to white dwarfs and the fates of the known exoplanets. Mon. Notices R. Astron. Soc. 2013, 432, 500–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Villaver, E.; Livio, M.; Mustill, A.J.; Siess, L. Hot Jupiters and Cool Stars. Astrophys. J. 2014, 794, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Aguilera-Gomez, C.; Chaname, J.; Pinsonneault, M.H.; Carlberg, J.K. On Lithium-rich Red Giants. I. Engulfment of Substellar Companions. Astrophys. J. 2016, 829, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Staff, J.E.; De Marco, O.; Wood, P.; Galaviz, P.; Passy, J.C. Hydrodynamic simulations of the interaction between giant stars and planets. Mon. Notices R. Astron. Soc. 2016, 458, 832–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Schaffenroth, V.; Barlow, B.; Geier, S.; Vučković, M.; Kilkenny, D.; Schaffenroth, J. News from the Erebos Project. Open Astron. 2017, 26, 208–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mustill, A.J.; Villaver, E.; Veras, D.; Gansicke, B.T.; Bonsor, A. Unstable low-mass planetary systems as drivers of white dwarf pollution. Mon. Notices R. Astron. Soc. 2018, 476, 3939–3955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Iben, I., Jr.; Tutukov, A.V. On the evolution of close binaries with components of initial mass between 3 solar masses and 12 solar masses. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 1985, 58, 661–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sabach, E.; Soker, N. The Class of Jsolated Stars and Luminous Planetary Nebulae in old stellar populations. arXiv, 2017; arXiv:1704.05395. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sabach, E.; Soker, N. Accounting for planet-shaped planetary nebulae. Mon. Notices R. Astron. Soc. 2018, 473, 286–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Soker, N. Can Planets Influence the Horizontal Branch Morphology? Astrophys. J. 1998, 116, 1308–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Geier, S.; Kupfer, T.; Schaffenroth, V.; Heber, U. Hot subdwarf stars in the Galactic halo Tracers of prominent events in late stellar evolution. Proc. Int. Astron. Union 2015, 11, 302–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Retter, A.; Marom, A. A model. Astron. Soc. 2003, 345, L25–L28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bear, E.; Kashi, A.; Soker, N. Mergerburst transients of brown dwarfs with exoplanets. Mon. Notices R. Astron. Soc. 2011, 416, 1965–1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kashi, A.; Soker, N. An intermediate luminosity optical transient (ILOTs) model for the young stellar object ASASSN-15qi. Mon. Notices R. Astron. Soc. 2017, 468, 4938–4943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bear, E.; Soker, N. Transient outburst events from tidally disrupted asteroids near white dwarfs. New Astron. 2013, 19, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Soker, N.; Kashi, A. Formation of Bipolar Planetary Nebulae by Intermediate-luminosity Optical Transients. Astrophys. J. 2012, 746, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Villaver, E. Planets, evolved stars, and how they might influence each other. Proc. Int. Astron. Union 2012, 283, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Villaver, E. The Fate of Planets. AIP Conf. Proc. 2011, 1331, 21. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Maximum radii stars reach on their RGB and AGB as function of their initial mass for traditional mass-loss rates (from [11]).
Figure 1. Maximum radii stars reach on their RGB and AGB as function of their initial mass for traditional mass-loss rates (from [11]).
Galaxies 06 00058 g001
Figure 2. A schematic evolution of the radii and densities of planets and stars from the pre-main-sequence phase to the WD phase. Upper panel: the ratio of the planet density to the stellar density. If the ratio is above 1, the planet dives in to the envelope as one entity. If the density ratio is below 1, the planet is tidally destroyed and forms an accretion belt/disk around the star. Lower panel: The planet and stellar radii as function of time.
Figure 2. A schematic evolution of the radii and densities of planets and stars from the pre-main-sequence phase to the WD phase. Upper panel: the ratio of the planet density to the stellar density. If the ratio is above 1, the planet dives in to the envelope as one entity. If the density ratio is below 1, the planet is tidally destroyed and forms an accretion belt/disk around the star. Lower panel: The planet and stellar radii as function of time.
Galaxies 06 00058 g002
Figure 3. Outcomes of planet–star interaction.
Figure 3. Outcomes of planet–star interaction.
Galaxies 06 00058 g003
Figure 4. Observed transient events on the energy–time diagram. Blue empty circles represent the total (radiated plus kinetic) energy of the observed transients as a function of the duration of their eruptions, i.e., usually the time for the visible luminosity to decrease by 3 magnitudes. The Optical Transient Stripe is populated by ILOT events that we [18] suggest are powered by gravitational energy of complete merger events or vigorous mass-transfer events. For details of this figure, see http://phsites.technion.ac.il/soker/ilot-club/.
Figure 4. Observed transient events on the energy–time diagram. Blue empty circles represent the total (radiated plus kinetic) energy of the observed transients as a function of the duration of their eruptions, i.e., usually the time for the visible luminosity to decrease by 3 magnitudes. The Optical Transient Stripe is populated by ILOT events that we [18] suggest are powered by gravitational energy of complete merger events or vigorous mass-transfer events. For details of this figure, see http://phsites.technion.ac.il/soker/ilot-club/.
Galaxies 06 00058 g004
Figure 5. The evolutionary channels and the PN types that result from them (based on De Marco & Soker 2011 [4]).
Figure 5. The evolutionary channels and the PN types that result from them (based on De Marco & Soker 2011 [4]).
Galaxies 06 00058 g005

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Soker, N. Planets, Planetary Nebulae, and Intermediate Luminosity Optical Transients (ILOTs). Galaxies 2018, 6, 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies6020058

AMA Style

Soker N. Planets, Planetary Nebulae, and Intermediate Luminosity Optical Transients (ILOTs). Galaxies. 2018; 6(2):58. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies6020058

Chicago/Turabian Style

Soker, Noam. 2018. "Planets, Planetary Nebulae, and Intermediate Luminosity Optical Transients (ILOTs)" Galaxies 6, no. 2: 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies6020058

APA Style

Soker, N. (2018). Planets, Planetary Nebulae, and Intermediate Luminosity Optical Transients (ILOTs). Galaxies, 6(2), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies6020058

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop