Next Article in Journal
What Drives the Ionized Gas Outflows in Radio-Quiet AGN?
Next Article in Special Issue
From Vision to Instrument: Creating a Next-Generation Event Horizon Telescope for a New Era of Black Hole Science
Previous Article in Journal
Searching for Phase-Locked Variations of the Emission-Line Profiles in Binary Be Stars
Previous Article in Special Issue
Key Science Goals for the Next-Generation Event Horizon Telescope
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Probing Neutrino Production in Blazars by Millimeter VLBI

by
Yuri Y. Kovalev
1,2,*,
Alexander V. Plavin
3,
Alexander B. Pushkarev
3,4 and
Sergey V. Troitsky
5,6
1
Max–Planck–Institut für Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hügel 69, 53121 Bonn, Germany
2
Black Hole Initiative, Harvard University, 20 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
3
Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Prospekt 53, 119991 Moscow, Russia
4
Crimean Astrophysical Observatory, Crimea, 298409 Nauchny, Russia
5
Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 60th October Anniversary Prospect 7a, 117312 Moscow, Russia
6
Faculty of Physics, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, 1-2 Leninskie Gory, 119991 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Galaxies 2023, 11(4), 84; https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies11040084
Submission received: 17 April 2023 / Revised: 1 July 2023 / Accepted: 5 July 2023 / Published: 10 July 2023

Abstract

:
The advancement of neutrino observatories has sparked a surge in multi-messenger astronomy. Multiple neutrino associations among blazars are reported while neutrino production sites are located within their central (sub)parsecs. Yet, many questions remain on the nature of those processes. The next generation Event Horizon Telescope (ngEHT) is uniquely positioned for these studies, as its high frequency and resolution can probe both the accretion disk region and the parsec-scale jet. This opens up new opportunities for connecting the two regions and unraveling the proton acceleration and neutrino production in blazars. We outline observational strategies for ngEHT and highlight what it can contribute to the multi-messenger study of blazars.

1. Introduction: Current Status of High-Energy Neutrino Studies, Blazar–Neutrino Connections

Neutrino observatories, such as IceCube, ANTARES (Astronomy with a Neutrino Telescope and Abyss environmental RESearch project), and Baikal-GVD (Gigaton Volume Detector) have been convincingly detecting astrophysical neutrinos at TeV to PeV energies [1,2,3,4]. Despite these observations, little was known about the origin of energetic astrophysical neutrinos until recently.
Blazars, a class of active galactic nuclei (AGN), have been considered as potential neutrino sources since the very early days of multi-messenger astronomy [5]. Observational evidence for a blazar–neutrino connection has started to emerge in recent years. First, the blazar TXS 0506+056 was associated with a high-energy neutrino, which coincided with a gamma-ray flare in 2017 [6]. This association was in contrast with a lack of systematic connection between gamma-ray-loud blazars and neutrinos (see, e.g., [7,8]). Then, numerous radio-bright blazars were shown to emit neutrinos with energies from TeVs to PeVs [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. The detection of this correlation is driven by the unique capabilities of very-long-baseline interferometry (VLBI): the only technique able to directly probe and resolve central (sub)parsecs in AGNs at cosmological distances. Blazars emit neutrinos preferentially at the times of their flares (Figure 1), visible in radio bands [10,12,15,17]. Still, the neutrino production mechanism and the physical regions where it occurs remain unclear. The observed connection of neutrinos with radio emission from compact jet regions emphasizes the importance of high-resolution studies in answering these questions. VLBI is the best direct visual evidence we can obtain in astronomy.
For a general discussion of multi-wavelength and multi-messenger studies with the ngEHT, see Lico et al. [18]. In this paper, we present the progress in multi-messenger astronomy studies of cosmic neutrinos, their probable association with blazars, challenges and a critical role to be played by ngEHT [19,20,21] in addressing exciting open questions of high-energy neutrino production.
Figure 1. Radio and gamma-ray light curves of TXS 0506+056. Top: Fermi LAT weekly binning light curve [22] of the gamma-ray source 4FGLJ0509.4+0542 positionally associated with the quasar TXS 0506+056. The gray horizontal line denotes the median gamma-ray flux. Bottom: RATAN-600 light curve at 11 GHz. The radio light curve is decomposed of three radio flares depicted by the blue dashed lines, the sum of which is represented by a blue thick line [23]. The vertical lines denote the times of neutrino arrival [6,23].
Figure 1. Radio and gamma-ray light curves of TXS 0506+056. Top: Fermi LAT weekly binning light curve [22] of the gamma-ray source 4FGLJ0509.4+0542 positionally associated with the quasar TXS 0506+056. The gray horizontal line denotes the median gamma-ray flux. Bottom: RATAN-600 light curve at 11 GHz. The radio light curve is decomposed of three radio flares depicted by the blue dashed lines, the sum of which is represented by a blue thick line [23]. The vertical lines denote the times of neutrino arrival [6,23].
Galaxies 11 00084 g001

2. Neutrino Production in Blazars: Open Questions

Assuming no particle physics beyond the standard model, astrophysical neutrinos with energies above TeV can only be produced in interactions of relativistic hadrons—protons or nuclei—with ambient matter or radiation, see, e.g., [24] for a recent review. This fits the observational evidence discussed in Section 1 because the non-thermal radiation of blazars gives a clear signal that particles are accelerated there. However, both the amount of relativistic hadrons in AGN, and the degree to which these hadrons contribute to the observed electromagnetic radiation, are uncertain. Population studies suggest [24,25,26] that their contribution is small, and neutrino luminosities of blazars are orders of magnitude lower than photon luminosities. Consequently, one may imagine neutrino production in various places in a blazar and by means of different mechanisms.
The main challenge is to explain the production of neutrinos of very different energies, from a few TeV [11,27] to sub-PeV [6,10], in sources of the same class. For the p γ mechanism, expected to dominate in blazars [28], the wide neutrino energy range requires the presence of target photons with a very broad distribution of energies. Conventional models of high-energy neutrino production in AGN, known for decades, e.g., [29,30,31], as well as their modern versions, e.g., [32,33,34], often experience problems in explaining the lower-energy part of the observed neutrino flux, particularly because the target photons from the accretion disk are expected to have energies ∼ ( 10 100 ) eV, while ∼10 keV are required for the intense production of ∼10 TeV neutrinos.
While neutrinos have already been associated with VLBI-bright blazars [11,15] and with their radio flares [10,12], these results were based on observations at centimeter wavelengths. There, synchrotron self-absorption prevents one from obtaining detailed spatio-temporal studies of the AGN central sub-parsec parts, e.g., [35]. To summarize, the open questions of the blazar–neutrino astrophysics are the following: (i) how are protons accelerated; (ii) what is the neutrino production process, p γ or p p ; (iii) from where do seed (X-ray) photons originate from in case of p γ ; (iv) where are neutrinos produced? Note that (ii) and (iv) can be different, and multi-zone models may be required to explain all observations consistently.

3. Neutrino Astronomy in the ngEHT Era

Currently, studies of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos and their sources are limited by the sensitivity and resolution of neutrino observatories. The situation is rapidly changing, as their capabilities are increasingly improving. The next-generation IceCube-Gen2 will grow the telescope volume ten-fold, from 1 to 10 km 3 , aiming at a corresponding increase in detection rates by 2033 [36]. The Baikal-GVD detector has already reached the effective volume of 0.5 km 3 and continues to grow and improve event reconstruction algorithms [37]. KM3Net (Cubic Kilometer Neutrino Telescope), a neutrino observatory in the Mediterranean, is being constructed and has already started yielding its first results [38]. Together, these instruments will provide a qualitative leap in both the number of detected astrophysical neutrinos and their precise localization.
An increasing number of well-localized neutrinos will lead to reliable identification of individual blazars as neutrino sources. Moreover, it should be possible to highlight specific time periods with more prominent neutrino emission. This brings new challenges and opportunities to the EM counterpart of such multi-messenger studies.
The planned ngEHT array [19,20,21] will provide superior angular resolution, dynamic range and sensitivity in Stokes I and polarization at 3, 1.3, and 0.7 mm. This will allow scientists to observe and monitor the central (sub)parsecs of neutrino-emitting blazars at the highest resolution and frequency possible, significantly alleviating the synchrotron opacity problem of the current centimeter-wavelength VLBI. The ngEHT will be able to probe both the accretion disk region and the parsec-scale jet base, opening new opportunities for connecting the two regions and unraveling the proton acceleration and neutrino production in blazars.

4. Planning ngEHT Experiments

Below, we discuss several approaches to study and understand the physics behind the connection between neutrino production and EM activity from the jet upstream of the central engine—a possibility which will be realized by ngEHT. Before elaborating on observational campaigns, we note the following important complications of neutrino astrophysics that affect the suggested scenarios below. A typical probability of a neutrino with an energy above 100 TeV to be of an astrophysical origin is around 50%, and it drops significantly for lower energies [39,40]. A typical 90% error region of a highly probable high-energy neutrino is several square degrees [40,41]. Some neutrinos might arrive from nearby non-jetted AGNs [42] or even from our Galaxy and its relativistic objects [43,44,45,46,47,48]. On top of this, we know very little about the mechanisms of neutrino production in blazars; therefore, there is no streetlight under which we can plan our search.
We expect that a variety of blazars could be associated with neutrinos, allowing us to select optimal ngEHT targets by accounting for both their physical properties and technical or observational limitations. Within our current understanding and the experience accumulated from observational searches for high-energy neutrino counterparts, the following three scenarios for monitoring observations are suggested.
Scenario 1: Observation of blazars associated with selected new high-energy neutrino alerts immediately after neutrino arrival. Several blazar-associated high-energy alerts per year are expected. When two or three neutrino telescopes become fully operational, one might conservatively require two alerts for a given target to arrive within several days.
Pros:
The most efficient strategy since it is linked to a specific event.
Cons:
It will only be able to probe the state of an associated object after neutrino arrival.
Scenario 2: Observation of a sample of selected blazars reliably identified previously as neutrino sources. See Table 1 for the current most probable neutrino candidates.
Pros:
This strategy is optimal in terms of the observed sample and complete temporal coverage of events.
Cons:
so far, a very limited number of cases are known with repeated neutrino detection from the same source (Table 1, column 5), but this list could grow.
Scenario 3: Observations of a complete VLBI-flux-density limited sample of 50–100 of the brightest blazars with a 3 mm VLBI flux density above 1 Jy [49,50].
Pros:
Offers full temporal coverage of the expected events, with the possibility to compare neutrino-emitting and neutrino-non-emitting blazars to calculate the robust significance of a coincidence [15,51]. Furthermore, the strategy provides the option to combine such observations with other ngEHT cases [20].
Cons:
Observationally expensive.
Table 1. Most probable neutrino candidates among the VLBI-selected bright blazars.
Table 1. Most probable neutrino candidates among the VLBI-selected bright blazars.
Blazar Namez S 86 GHz VLBI Number of High-EnergyReferences
B1950Alias (Jy)Neutrinos (and Dates)
0506+056 0.340.6 2 (2017-09-22, 2021-04-18)[6,23]
0735+178OI 1580.450.61–4 (2021-12-04&08)[15,49]
1253−0553C 2790.5422.71 (2015-09-26)[10,50]
1502+106OR 1031.840.61 (2019-07-30)[10,49]
1730−130NRAO 5300.901.9 1 (2016-01-28)[10,52]
1741−038 1.053.22 (2011-09-30, 2022-02-05)[15,49]
1749+096OT 0810.322.41 (2022-03-03)[15,49]
2145+0674C +06.691.003.6 1 (2015-08-12)[10,52]
Notes: Publications that selected each blazar as a highly probable neutrino-emitter and measured their flux densities are referenced in the last column. The 0506+056 blazar was the first and only blazar distinguished by the IceCube, while the others were found by statistical analysis of complete VLBI-selected samples. The dates for high-energy neutrinos are shown in the format YYYY-MM-DD. Estimated from nearby VLBI measurements at 15 and 43 GHz of MOJAVE and Boston University VLBA programs.
Tracing changes in the compact structure of blazars during and around periods of increased neutrino emission requires multi-epoch monitoring at the high resolution provided by ngEHT. To roughly estimate the required observation time, we expect that one imaging epoch per target will take 4–8 h. The observations should happen with a cadence between two weeks and one month (an estimate based on experience gained by the 7 mm blazar VLBA-monitoring program [53]) and produce polarization images with Stokes I dynamic range or better than 1000:1, preferably multi-frequency with a possibility for Faraday rotation measurements (RMs) and spectral analysis. From this, we will be able to constrain the following source properties.
  • Jet kinematic measurements will allow us to better estimate Doppler boosting and jet viewing angle following, e.g., [53,54], constrain plasma acceleration, e.g., [53,55]. Jet geometry profile studies will constrain jet formation and collimation [56,57].
  • Jet kinematics will also deliver information about newborn jet features, e.g., [53,58], measure ejection epochs of features possibly associated with neutrino events, compare these with neutrino arrival times and locate the neutrino production zone from the measured delay. Comparison with similar analyses for VLBI- γ -ray studies [59,60].
  • Faraday RM, reconstructed EVPAs and analysis of radio spectra together with core-shift measurements will deliver information on the magnetic field structure, its strength and changes, e.g., [61,62,63], which might be related to the physical conditions required for neutrino production.
  • Monitoring the overall changes in the millimeter parsec- and sub-parsec-scale structure of blazars at the extreme resolution of ngEHT will allow us to distinguish between flares in disks and in jets, e.g., [64,65] related to neutrino production if the resolution, sensitivity, and opacity permit. Observing in this regime, we will be able to overcome significant delays related to synchrotron self-absorption at lower radio frequencies (see Figure 1 and [60]).
We underline that studying a complete sample of AGN with understandable properties will allow us to not only relate the observed changes to detected neutrinos but also set a robust significance on that association, following the approach suggested by Plavin et al. [15].

5. Synergy with Other Facilities

The Square Kilometer Array, SKA [66] and especially the next-generation Very Large Array, ngVLA [67,68] going as high as 100 GHz will allow the monitoring of much larger samples of VLBI-selected AGNs as well as the faster imaging of neutrino arrival fields, and pre-selecting probable neutrino candidates for targeted ngEHT studies. Wide-field telescopes such as the optical Legacy Survey of Space and Time, LSST [69] will allow scientists to better associate blazars with neutrinos in cases where flaring activity is confirmed as a valid indicator, e.g., [6,15,70]. Moreover, optical and UV telescopes can separate flares occurring in jets and accretion disks, analyzing the optical color and polarization. Seed photons are expected from X-rays [11,64,71], where current and new-generation space X-ray telescopes will be very helpful. High energies, e.g., the Cherenkov Telescope Array, CTA [72,73], will continue to support gamma-ray/TeV–neutrino analyses and identify whether neutrino production zones are opaque to gamma-rays.

6. Summary

The ngEHT will revolutionize VLBI-imaging capabilities by bringing together the power of very high resolution, advanced dynamic range, and sensitive polarization data. What makes it unique, however, is its remarkable immunity to synchrotron absorption. It will allow for regions to be extensively probed from the accretion disk to the parsec-scale jet, e.g., [74], and study the most probable sources of high-energy neutrinos.
When ngEHT is fully operational, three large high-energy neutrino telescopes will be fully functional: IceCube, KM3NeT, and Baikal-GVD. This paper formulates the case, presents eight most probable associations to date, and suggests observational strategies to address very exciting and open questions concerning proton acceleration and neutrino production.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, Y.Y.K.; writing—original draft preparation as well as review and editing, Y.Y.K., A.V.P., A.B.P. and S.V.T.; visualization, A.B.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This publication was funded in part by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. It was also made possible through the support of a grant from the John Templeton Foundation. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of these foundations.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank the ngEHT team for discussions, Eduardo Ros as well as anonymous referees for useful comments on the manuscript, and Elena Bazanova for language editing. The VLBA is an instrument of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory. The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the National Science Foundation operated by Associated Universities, Inc.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kopper, C.; Whitehorn, N.; Kurahashi Neilson, N.; IceCube Collaboration. Evidence for High-Energy Extraterrestrial Neutrinos at the IceCube Detector. Science 2013, 342, 1242856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Aartsen, M.G.; Abraham, K.; Ackermann, M.; Adams, J.; Aguilar, J.A.; Ahlers, M.; Ahrens, M.; Altmann, D.; Andeen, K.; Anderson, T.; et al. Observation and Characterization of a Cosmic Muon Neutrino Flux from the Northern Hemisphere Using Six Years of IceCube Data. Astrophys. J. 2016, 833, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Albert, A.; André, M.; Anghinolfi, M.; Anton, G.; Ardid, M.; Aubert, J.J.; Aublin, J.; Avgitas, T.; Baret, B.; Barrios-Martí, J.; et al. All-flavor Search for a Diffuse Flux of Cosmic Neutrinos with Nine Years of ANTARES Data. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2018, 853, L7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Allakhverdyan, V.A.; Avrorin, A.D.; Avrorin, A.V.; Aynutdinov, V.M.; Bardačová, Z.; Belolaptikov, I.A.; Borina, I.V.; Budnev, N.M.; Dik, V.Y.; Domogatsky, G.V.; et al. Diffuse neutrino flux measurements with the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope. Phys. Rev. D 2023, 107, 042005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Berezinsky, V. Extraterrestrial neutrino sources and high energy neutrino astrophysics. In Proceedings of the Neutrino-77 Conference, Moscow, Russia, 18–24 June 1977; p. 177. [Google Scholar]
  6. Aartsen, M.G.; Ackermann, M.; Adams, J.; Aguilar, J.A.; Ahlers, M.; Ahrens, M.; Al Samarai, I.; Altmann, D.; Andeen, K.; Anderson, T.; et al. Multimessenger observations of a flaring blazar coincident with high-energy neutrino IceCube-170922A. Science 2018, 361, aat1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Neronov, A.; Semikoz, D.V.; Ptitsyna, K. Strong constraints on hadronic models of blazar activity from Fermi and IceCube stacking analysis. Astron. Astrophys. 2017, 603, A135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Murase, K.; Oikonomou, F.; Petropoulou, M. Blazar Flares as an Origin of High-energy Cosmic Neutrinos? Astrophys. J. 2018, 865, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kadler, M.; Krauß, F.; Mannheim, K.; Ojha, R.; Müller, C.; Schulz, R.; Anton, G.; Baumgartner, W.; Beuchert, T.; Buson, S.; et al. Coincidence of a high-fluence blazar outburst with a PeV-energy neutrino event. Nat. Phys. 2016, 12, 807–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Plavin, A.; Kovalev, Y.Y.; Kovalev, Y.A.; Troitsky, S. Observational Evidence for the Origin of High-energy Neutrinos in Parsec-scale Nuclei of Radio-bright Active Galaxies. Astrophys. J. 2020, 894, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Plavin, A.V.; Kovalev, Y.Y.; Kovalev, Y.A.; Troitsky, S.V. Directional Association of TeV to PeV Astrophysical Neutrinos with Radio Blazars. Astrophys. J. 2021, 908, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hovatta, T.; Lindfors, E.; Kiehlmann, S.; Max-Moerbeck, W.; Hodges, M.; Liodakis, I.; Lähteemäki, A.; Pearson, T.J.; Readhead, A.C.S.; Reeves, R.A.; et al. Association of IceCube neutrinos with radio sources observed at Owens Valley and Metsähovi Radio Observatories. Astrophys. J. 2021, 650, A83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Illuminati, G.; ANTARES Collaboration. ANTARES search for neutrino flares from the direction of radio-bright blazars. In Proceedings of the 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference, Barcelona, Spain, 4–8 July 2022; p. 972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Allakhverdyan, V.A.; Avrorin, A.D.; Avrorin, A.V.; Aynutdinov, V.M.; Bannasch, R.; Bardačová, Z.; Zaborov, D.N. The Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope: Search for high-energy cascades. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2108.01894. [Google Scholar]
  15. Plavin, A.V.; Kovalev, Y.Y.; Kovalev, Y.A.; Troitsky, S.V. Growing evidence for high-energy neutrinos originating in radio blazars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2023, 523, 1799–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Buson, S.; Tramacere, A.; Oswald, L.; Barbano, E.; Fichet de Clairfontaine, G.; Pfeiffer, L.; Azzollini, A.; Baghmanyan, V.; Ajello, M. Extragalactic neutrino factories. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2305.11263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Britzen, S.; Zajaček, M.; Popović, L.Č.; Fendt, C.; Tramacere, A.; Pashchenko, I.N.; Jaron, F.; Pánis, R.; Petrov, L.; Aller, M.F.; et al. A ring accelerator? Unusual jet dynamics in the IceCube candidate PKS 1502+106. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2021, 503, 3145–3178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lico, R.; Jorstad, S.G.; Marscher, A.P.; Gómez, J.L.; Liodakis, I.; Dahale, R.; Alberdi, A.; Gold, R.; Traianou, E.; Toscano, T.; et al. Multi-Wavelength and Multi-Messenger Studies Using the Next-Generation Event Horizon Telescope. Galaxies 2023, 11, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Raymond, A.W.; Palumbo, D.; Paine, S.N.; Blackburn, L.; Córdova Rosado, R.; Doeleman, S.S.; Farah, J.R.; Johnson, M.D.; Roelofs, F.; Tilanus, R.P.J.; et al. Evaluation of New Submillimeter VLBI Sites for the Event Horizon Telescope. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2021, 253, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Johnson, M.D.; Akiyama, K.; Blackburn, L.; Bouman, K.L.; Broderick, A.E.; Cardoso, V.; Fender, R.P.; Fromm, C.M.; Galison, P.; Gómez, J.L.; et al. Key Science Goals for the Next-Generation Event Horizon Telescope. Galaxies 2023, 11, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Doeleman, S.S.; Barrett, J.; Blackburn, L.; Bouman, K.; Broderick, A.E.; Chaves, R.; Fish, V.L.; Fitzpatrick, G.; Fuentes, A.; Freeman, M.; et al. Reference Array and Design Consideration for the next-generation Event Horizon Telescope. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2306.08787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Abdollahi, S.; Ajello, M.; Baldini, L.; Ballet, J.; Bastieri, D.; Becerra Gonzalez, J.; Bellazzini, R.; Berretta, A.; Bissaldi, E.; Bonino, R.; et al. The Fermi-LAT Lightcurve Repository. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2023, 265, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Erkenov, A.K.; Kosogorov, N.A.; Kovalev, Y.A.; Kovalev, Y.Y.; Plavin, A.V.; Popkov, A.V.; Pushkarev, A.B.; Semikoz, D.V.; Sotnikova, Y.V.; Troitsky, S.V.; et al. High-energy neutrino-induced cascade from the direction of the flaring radio blazar TXS 0506+056 observed by the Baikal Gigaton Volume Detector in 2021. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2210.01650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Troitsky, S. Constraints on models of the origin of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos. Usp. Fiz. Nauk 2021, 191, 1333–1360. [Google Scholar]
  25. Neronov, A.; Semikoz, D. Self-consistent model of extragalactic neutrino flux from evolving blazar population. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 2020, 158, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Capel, F.; Mortlock, D.J.; Finley, C. Bayesian constraints on the astrophysical neutrino source population from IceCube data. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 101, 123017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Aartsen, M.G.; Ackermann, M.; Adams, J.; Aguilar, J.A.; Ahlers, M.; Ahrens, M.; Al Samarai, I.; Altmann, D.; Andeen, K.; Anderson, T.; et al. Neutrino emission from the direction of the blazar TXS 0506+056 prior to the IceCube-170922A alert. Science 2018, 361, 147–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Böttcher, M. Progress in Multi-wavelength and Multi-Messenger Observations of Blazars and Theoretical Challenges. Galaxies 2019, 7, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Berezinskii, V.S.; Ginzburg, V.L. On high-energy neutrino radiation of quasars and active galactic nuclei. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1981, 194, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Eichler, D. High-energy neutrino astronomy: A probe of galactic nuclei? Astrophys. J. 1979, 232, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Stecker, F.W.; Done, C.; Salamon, M.H.; Sommers, P. High-energy neutrinos from active galactic nuclei. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1991, 66, 2697–2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Neronov, A.Y.; Semikoz, D.V. Which blazars are neutrino loud? Phys. Rev. 2002, D66, 123003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Stecker, F.W. PeV neutrinos observed by IceCube from cores of active galactic nuclei. Phys. Rev. 2013, D88, 047301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Kalashev, O.; Semikoz, D.; Tkachev, I. Neutrinos in IceCube from active galactic nuclei. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 2015, 120, 541–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Boccardi, B.; Krichbaum, T.P.; Ros, E.; Zensus, J.A. Radio observations of active galactic nuclei with mm-VLBI. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 2017, 25, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Aartsen, M.G.; Abbasi, R.; Ackermann, M.; Adams, J.; Aguilar, J.A.; Ahlers, M.; Ahrens, M.; Alispach, C.; Allison, P.; Amin, N.M.; et al. IceCube-Gen2: The window to the extreme Universe. J. Phys. Nucl. Phys. 2021, 48, 060501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Belolaptikov, I.; Dzhilkibaev, Z.A.M.; Allakhverdyan, V.A.; Avrorin, A.D.; Avrorin, A.V.; Aynutdinov, V.M.; Bannasch, R.; Bardacová, Z.; Belolaptikov, I.A.; Borina, I.V.; et al. Neutrino Telescope in Lake Baikal: Present and Nearest Future. In Proceedings of the 37th International Cosmic Ray Conference, Berlin, Germany, 12–23 July 2022; p. 2. [Google Scholar]
  38. Aiello, S.; Akrame, S.E.; Ameli, F.; Anassontzis, E.G.; Andre, M.; Androulakis, G.; Anghinolfi, M.; Anton, G.; Ardid, M.; Aublin, J.; et al. Sensitivity of the KM3NeT/ARCA neutrino telescope to point-like neutrino sources. Astropart. Phys. 2019, 111, 100–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ahlers, M.; Halzen, F. Opening a new window onto the universe with IceCube. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 2018, 102, 73–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Abbasi, R.; Ackermann, M.; Adams, J.; Agarwalla, S.K.; Aguilar, J.A.; Ahlers, M.; Alameddine, J.M.; Amin, N.M.; Andeen, K.; Anton, G.; et al. IceCat-1: The IceCube Event Catalog of Alert Tracks. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2304.01174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Aartsen, M.G.; Ackermann, M.; Adams, J.; Aguilar, J.A.; Ahlers, M.; Ahrens, M.; Altmann, D.; Andeen, K.; Anderson, T.; Ansseau, I.; et al. The IceCube Realtime Alert System. Astropart. Phys. 2017, 92, 30–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Abbasi, R.; Ackermann, M.; Adams, J.; Aguilar, J.A.; Ahlers, M.; Ahrens, M.; Alameddine, J.M.; Alispach, C.; Alves Jr, A.A.; Amin, N.M.; et al. Evidence for neutrino emission from the nearby active galaxy NGC 1068. Science 2022, 378, 538–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kovalev, Y.Y.; Plavin, A.V.; Troitsky, S.V. Galactic Contribution to the High-energy Neutrino Flux Found in Track-like IceCube Events. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2022, 940, L41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Troitsky, S.V. Constraints on models of the origin of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos. Phys. Uspekhi 2021, 64, 1261–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bykov, A.M.; Petrov, A.E.; Kalyashova, M.E.; Troitsky, S.V. PeV Photon and Neutrino Flares from Galactic Gamma-Ray Binaries. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2021, 921, L10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Koljonen, K.I.I.; Satalecka, K.; Lindfors, E.J.; Liodakis, I. Microquasar Cyg X-3—A unique jet-wind neutrino factory? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2023, 524, L89–L93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Abbasi, R.; Ackermann, M.; Adams, J.; Agarwalla, S.K.; Aguilar, J.A.; Ahlers, M.; Alameddine, J.M.; Amin, N.M.; Andeen, K.; Anton, G.; et al. Constraining High-energy Neutrino Emission from Supernovae with IceCube. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2023, 949, L12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Abbasi, R.; Ackermann, M.; Adams, J.; Aguilar, J.A.; Ahlers, M.; Ahrens, M.; Alameddine, J.M.; Alves, A.A., Jr.; Amin, N.M.; Andeen, K.; et al. Observation of high-energy neutrinos from the Galactic plane. Science 2023, 380, 1338–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Lee, S.S.; Lobanov, A.P.; Krichbaum, T.P.; Witzel, A.; Zensus, A.; Bremer, M.; Greve, A.; Grewing, M. A Global 86 GHz VLBI Survey of Compact Radio Sources. Astron. J. 2008, 136, 159–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Nair, D.G.; Lobanov, A.P.; Krichbaum, T.P.; Ros, E.; Zensus, J.A.; Kovalev, Y.Y.; Lee, S.S.; Mertens, F.; Hagiwara, Y.; Bremer, M.; et al. Global millimeter VLBI array survey of ultracompact extragalactic radio sources at 86 GHz. Astrophys. J. 2019, 622, A92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Liodakis, I.; Hovatta, T.; Pavlidou, V.; Readhead, A.C.S.; Blandford, R.D.; Kiehlmann, S.; Lindfors, E.; Max-Moerbeck, W.; Pearson, T.J.; Petropoulou, M. The hunt for extraterrestrial high-energy neutrino counterparts. Astrophys. J. 2022, 666, A36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Agudo, I.; Thum, C.; Wiesemeyer, H.; Krichbaum, T.P. A 3.5 mm Polarimetric Survey of Radio-loud Active Galactic Nuclei. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2010, 189, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Weaver, Z.R.; Jorstad, S.G.; Marscher, A.P.; Morozova, D.A.; Troitsky, I.S.; Agudo, I.; Gómez, J.L.; Lähteenmäki, A.; Tammi, J.; Tornikoski, M. Kinematics of Parsec-scale Jets of Gamma-Ray Blazars at 43 GHz during 10 yr of the VLBA-BU-BLAZAR Program. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 2022, 260, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Homan, D.C.; Cohen, M.H.; Hovatta, T.; Kellermann, K.I.; Kovalev, Y.Y.; Lister, M.L.; Popkov, A.V.; Pushkarev, A.B.; Ros, E.; Savolainen, T. MOJAVE. XIX. Brightness Temperatures and Intrinsic Properties of Blazar Jets. Astrophys. J. 2021, 923, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Homan, D.C.; Lister, M.L.; Kovalev, Y.Y.; Pushkarev, A.B.; Savolainen, T.; Kellermann, K.I.; Richards, J.L.; Ros, E. MOJAVE. XII. Acceleration and Collimation of Blazar Jets on Parsec Scales. Astrophys. J. 2015, 798, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Asada, K.; Nakamura, M. The Structure of the M87 Jet: A Transition from Parabolic to Conical Streamlines. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2012, 745, L28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Kovalev, Y.Y.; Pushkarev, A.B.; Nokhrina, E.E.; Plavin, A.V.; Beskin, V.S.; Chernoglazov, A.V.; Lister, M.L.; Savolainen, T. A transition from parabolic to conical shape as a common effect in nearby AGN jets. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2020, 495, 3576–3591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lister, M.L.; Homan, D.C.; Kellermann, K.I.; Kovalev, Y.Y.; Pushkarev, A.B.; Ros, E.; Savolainen, T. Monitoring of Jets in Active Galactic Nuclei with VLBA Experiments. XVIII. Kinematics and Inner Jet Evolution of Bright Radio-loud Active Galaxies. Astrophys. J. 2021, 923, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jorstad, S.G.; Marscher, A.P.; Morozova, D.A.; Troitsky, I.S.; Agudo, I.; Casadio, C.; Foord, A.; Gómez, J.L.; MacDonald, N.R.; Molina, S.N.; et al. Kinematics of Parsec-scale Jets of Gamma-Ray Blazars at 43 GHz within the VLBA-BU-BLAZAR Program. Astrophys. J. 2017, 846, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kramarenko, I.G.; Pushkarev, A.B.; Kovalev, Y.Y.; Lister, M.L.; Hovatta, T.; Savolainen, T. A decade of joint MOJAVE-Fermi AGN monitoring: Localization of the gamma-ray emission region. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2022, 510, 469–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lobanov, A.P. Spectral distributions in compact radio sources. I. Imaging with VLBI data. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 1998, 132, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kravchenko, E.V.; Kovalev, Y.Y.; Sokolovsky, K.V. Parsec-scale Faraday rotation and polarization of 20 active galactic nuclei jets. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2017, 467, 83–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Martí-Vidal, I.; Muller, S.; Vlemmings, W.; Horellou, C.; Aalto, S. A strong magnetic field in the jet base of a supermassive black hole. Science 2015, 348, 311–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Murase, K. Active Galactic Nuclei as High-Energy Neutrino Sources. In Neutrino Astronomy: Current Status, Future Prospects; Gaisser, T., Karle, A., Eds.; World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.: Singapore, 2017; pp. 15–31. ISBN 9789814759410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Kalashev, O.E.; Kivokurtseva, P.; Troitsky, S. Neutrino production in blazar radio cores. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2212.03151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Paragi, Z.; Godfrey, L.; Reynolds, C.; Rioja, M.J.; Deller, A.; Zhang, B.; Gurvits, L.; Bietenholz, M.; Szomoru, A.; Bignall, H.E.; et al. Very Long Baseline Interferometry with the SKA. In Proceedings of the Advancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array (AASKA14), Giardini Naxos, Italy, 9–13 June 2014; p. 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Murphy, E.J.; Bolatto, A.; Chatterjee, S.; Casey, C.M.; Chomiuk, L.; Dale, D.; de Pater, I.; Dickinson, M.; Francesco, J.D.; Hallinan, G.; et al. The ngVLA Science Case and Associated Science Requirements. In Science with a Next Generation Very Large Array; Murphy, E., Ed.; Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series; ASP: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2018; Volume 517, p. 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Selina, R.J.; Murphy, E.J.; McKinnon, M.; Beasley, A.; Butler, B.; Carilli, C.; Clark, B.; Durand, S.; Erickson, A.; Grammer, W.; et al. The ngVLA Reference Design. In Science with a Next Generation Very Large Array; Murphy, E., Ed.; Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series; ASP: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2018; Volume 517, p. 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ivezić, Ž.; Kahn, S.M.; Tyson, J.A.; Abel, B.; Acosta, E.; Allsman, R.; Alonso, D.; AlSayyad, Y.; Anderson, S.F.; Andrew, J.; et al. LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products. Astrophys. J. 2019, 873, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lipunov, V.M.; Kornilov, V.G.; Zhirkov, K.; Gorbovskoy, E.; Budnev, N.M.; Buckley, D.A.H.; Rebolo, R.; Serra-Ricart, M.; Podesta, R.; Tyurina, N.; et al. Optical Observations Reveal Strong Evidence for High-energy Neutrino Progenitor. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2020, 896, L19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Plavin, A.V.; Burenin, R.A.; Kovalev, Y.Y.; Lutovinov, A.A.; Starobinsky, A.A.; Troitsky, S.V.; Zakharov, E.I. Hard X-ray emission from blazars associated with high-energy neutrinos. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2306.00960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Actis, M.; Agnetta, G.; Aharonian, F.; Akhperjanian, A.; Aleksić, J.; Aliu, E.; Allan, D.; Allekotte, I.; Antico, F.; Antonelli, L.A.; et al. Design concepts for the Cherenkov Telescope Array CTA: An advanced facility for ground-based high-energy gamma-ray astronomy. Exp. Astron. 2011, 32, 193–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Cherenkov Telescope Array Consortium; Acharya, B.S.; Agudo, I.; Al Samarai, I.; Alfaro, R.; Alfaro, J.; Alispach, C.; Alves Batista, R.; Amans, J.P.; Amato, E.; et al. Science with the Cherenkov Telescope Array; World Scientific: Singapore, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Lu, R.S.; Asada, K.; Krichbaum, T.P.; Park, J.; Tazaki, F.; Pu, H.Y.; Nakamura, M.; Lobanov, A.; Hada, K.; Akiyama, K.; et al. A ring-like accretion structure in M87 connecting its black hole and jet. Nature 2023, 616, 686–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kovalev, Y.Y.; Plavin, A.V.; Pushkarev, A.B.; Troitsky, S.V. Probing Neutrino Production in Blazars by Millimeter VLBI. Galaxies 2023, 11, 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies11040084

AMA Style

Kovalev YY, Plavin AV, Pushkarev AB, Troitsky SV. Probing Neutrino Production in Blazars by Millimeter VLBI. Galaxies. 2023; 11(4):84. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies11040084

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kovalev, Yuri Y., Alexander V. Plavin, Alexander B. Pushkarev, and Sergey V. Troitsky. 2023. "Probing Neutrino Production in Blazars by Millimeter VLBI" Galaxies 11, no. 4: 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies11040084

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop