Next Article in Journal
Impact of Donor Age on Graft Failure After Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation by Donor-Recipient Sex Combinations: An Analysis of the UNOS OPTN Database
Previous Article in Journal
Behavioural Cardiology: A Review on an Expanding Field of Cardiology—Holistic Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Lactate as a Preoperative Predictor of Mortality in Patients Undergoing Emergency Type A Aortic Dissection Repair
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Carotid Siphon as a Pulsatility Modulator for Brain Protection: Role of Arterial Calcification Formation

by
Pim A. de Jong
1,*,
Daniel Bos
2,3,4,
Huiberdina L. Koek
5,
Pieter T. Deckers
1,
Netanja I. Harlianto
1,
Ynte M. Ruigrok
6,
Wilko Spiering
7,
Jaco Zwanenburg
8 and
Willem P.Th.M. Mali
1
1
Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
2
Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
3
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
4
Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02138, USA
5
Department of Geriatric Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
6
Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
7
Department of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
8
Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Pers. Med. 2025, 15(8), 356; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15080356
Submission received: 18 June 2025 / Revised: 24 July 2025 / Accepted: 28 July 2025 / Published: 4 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Cardiothoracic Surgery)

Abstract

A healthy vasculature with well-regulated perfusion and pulsatility is essential for the brain. One vascular structure that has received little attention is the carotid siphon. The proximal portion of the siphon is stiff due to the narrow location in the skull base, whilst the distal portion is highly flexible. This flexible part in combination with the specific curves lead to lower pulsatility at the cost of energy deposition in the arterial wall. This deposited energy contributes to damage and calcification. Severe siphon calcification stiffens the distal part of the siphon, leading to less damping of the pulsatility. Increased blood flow pulsatility is a possible cause of stroke and cognitive disorders. In this review, based on comprehensive multimodality imaging, we first describe the anatomy and physiology of the carotid siphon. Subsequently, we review the in vivo imaging data, which indeed suggest that the siphon attenuates pulsatility. Finally, the data as available in the literature are shown to provide convincing evidence that severe siphon calcifications and the calcification pattern are linked to incident stroke and dementia. Interventional studies are required to test whether this association is causal and how an assessment of pulsatility and the siphon calcification pattern can improve personalized medicine, working to prevent and treat brain disease.

1. Introduction

The human carotid siphon is a highly curved part of the internal carotid artery, subdivided into seven segments (Figure 1). C1 is extracranial, while C2 and C3 are located in the skull base, fixed in the bone and unable to pulsate (Figure 1) [1,2]. C4 and C5 are intracranial within the cavernous sinus, allowing free movement and pulsation due to a lack of attachments. After crossing the dura mater, C6 and C7 lie intradurally before bifurcating into the anterior and middle cerebral arteries. The siphon wall is thin, lacking an external elastic lamina [3,4], and is densely innervated, partly by parasympathetic nerve fibers, but their function is unknown [5,6,7,8].
Several mechanisms exist to protect the brain against pulsatile flow, including aortic elasticity and pressure dissipation by the circle of Willis [9,10]. Hunter already postulated in 1793 that there is a specific role for the carotid siphon [11]. Arterial curves generally reduce pulsatility by converting the blood’s inertia into vessel wall strain through centrifugal forces, stretching the vessel longitudinally rather than radially (Windkessel effect) [12,13,14]. Both mechanisms reduce downstream pulsatility and the Pulsatility Index (PI), which can be measured via flow, area, or velocity. The PI is a reflection of flow pulsatility. Velocity PI (vPI) and area distensibility index (aPI) indicate local arterial stiffness and can be measured using 2D or 3D phase-contrast MRI (PCMRI) [15]. Schubert et al. [16] used 3D-PCMRI at 3 Tesla in 17 healthy volunteers and found PI decreases between levels C4 and C7 of the internal carotid artery (ICA), suggesting that curves in the cavernous sinus reduce pulsatility. A recent study [17] using 2D-flow PCMRI in 118 healthy individuals showed that vPI increased from C1 to C3, with no net change between C1 and C7, suggesting that the rigid carotid canal at C3 restricts wall motion and increases the vPI, while the siphon reabsorbs kinetic energy, reducing the vPI again. Thus, the canal and siphon function as a unit to redistribute energy, locally damping flow pulsatility.
Pulsatility attenuation in the carotid siphon declines with age and calcifications. In a study of 17 cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD) patients and 17 controls using 4D-PCMRI at 7T, both groups showed an increased vPI and a decreased aPI in the C3–C4 segment. However, the vPI attenuated from C1 to C7 in controls but not in cSVD patients; instead, the vPI increased from C1 to C7 in cSVD, indicating abnormal pulsatility regulation [18,19]. Another study of 50 pseudoxanthoma elasticum (PXE) patients and 40 controls using 2D-flow MRI at 3T found a higher vPI and reduced distensibility in PXE patients, but attenuation between C4 and the MCA was similar in both groups. Subsequent analysis showed that PXE patients had a higher flow PI, associated with severe siphon calcification, a reduced gray matter volume, more white matter lesions, and lacunar infarctions [19,20,21,22,23,24].
Overall, the healthy carotid siphon dampens kinetic energy pulsatility, but aging and calcifying diseases cause siphon stiffening, preventing this attenuation and transmitting harmful pulsatility to the cerebral tissue, contributing to cSVD-related damage [9,10,11].
Remarkably, internal elastic lamina calcification in the siphon can occur in children [25], reflecting the repair of damaged elastic fibers from energy deposition [7,26,27]. Early studies showed two types of siphon calcification: atherosclerotic intimal calcifications and elastic lamina or medial calcifications (diffuse, ring-like) [28,29]. On imaging, atherosclerotic calcifications were scattered and focal, while medial calcifications were diffuse and tended to form rings [30]. The degree of calcification is often graded as none, mild, moderate, or severe [28,29].
Woodcock et al. [31] proposed a qualitative CT grading scale based on continuity and thickness, later modified by Babiarz et al. [32] to include the circumferential extent (<90°, 90–270°, 270–360°) and thickness (0 to >3 mm). The Rotterdam Study introduced semi-automatic quantification, defining calcifications as pixels >130 HU (Figure 2) [33]. Calcification was defined as pixels above 130 HU localized in the arterial wall, as proposed for the coronary arteries by Agatston [34].
Recently, a CT-based scoring system has differentiated intimal from medial calcifications, as validated against histology [26]. In one study, 72% of siphon calcifications were medial (elastic lamina) and only 28% atherosclerotic intimal, suggesting that siphon calcifications in Caucasians are often non-atherosclerotic. The scoring system assesses circularity, thickness, and morphology, with ≥7 points indicating medial calcification dominance [35]. While it cannot differentiate limited calcifications, it reliably categorizes dominant patterns in cohorts.
Although, recently, the carotid siphon and its calcification have gotten more attention, and our knowledge of the hemodynamic meaning of the siphon and the effects of calcification have increased, little is known about the determinants of carotid siphon calcification and its association with clinical disease. This literature review aims to summarize the most up-to-date literature on the carotid siphon and to place the findings of risk factors and calcifications in perspective.

2. Literature Search Methods

The articles included in this narrative review were selected by means of author expertise, which was supplemented by searches in PubMed up to September 2024. Articles describing the carotid siphon and physiology, calcifications, or risk factors were included by the first and senior authors (P.A.d.J. and W.P.Th.M.). Case reports were excluded. A search was performed using a combination of the terms (“carotid siphon” OR “intracranial carotid”) AND (“pulsatility” OR “distensibility” OR “elasticity” OR “calcification” OR “risk factor”). In addition, we performed a citation review of the reference lists of included primary and review articles. Included articles were published in English, and no other languages were considered.

3. Determinants of Carotid Siphon Calcification

Studies have investigated determinants of siphon calcification presence, volume, and severity. Data on intimal versus medial calcification dominance are growing, though older studies remain hard to interpret due to differing risk factors [36,37,38].
Age is the most investigated determinant. Bos et al. [39] found calcification in up to 80% of a population (mean age 69.6 years). In a CT study of 1868 trauma patients, mild calcifications appeared in up to 10% before age 30, increasing to 30% by the fifth decade, then declining in the tenth. Moderate calcifications emerged in the fifth decade (12%), peaking at 55% in the ninth. Severe calcifications began in the sixth decade (3%), rising to 47% by the tenth decade [25].
The Rotterdam cohort applied CT scoring in 2391 stroke-free participants (mean age 69.6 years): intimal calcifications were present in 37% under age 65, decreasing to 13% over 85; medial calcifications increased from 27% under 65 to 79% over 85, with 98% having any calcification by age 85+ [38].
Beyond age, determinants include diabetes, renal dysfunction, hypertension, and aortic stiffness [40,41,42,43,44,45,46] (Table 1). Sex differences are minimal [47], the influence of race is largely unknown, and associations with obesity, smoking, and dyslipidemia are inconsistent [39,42,43,48,49,50]. More or less consistent positive associations are found with diabetes mellitus, renal dysfunction, hypertension, and aortic stiffening [49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56]. The heritability of siphon calcification was in one study estimated to be large [57], while less conventional risk factors, including aldosterone, 3-hydroxybutyrade, homocysteine, and missing teeth, remain underexplored [58,59,60,61,62,63].

4. Clinical Disease Associations of Carotid Siphon Calcification

A large number of studies have investigated siphon calcifications in relation to intracranial disease outcomes [64,65,66]. Most studies used the visual or quantitative calcification severity, but some determined whether there was atherosclerotic versus internal elastic lamina calcification (Table 2).

4.1. Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

The few available studies suggest that the siphon calcification burden is associated with poor outcomes in subarachnoid hemorrhage. Engel et al. observed in 716 patients that severe siphon calcifications were associated with poor outcomes, but less vasospasm [98]. The authors suggested that stiff arteries may prevent vasospasm, but apparently not a poor outcome [67]. One case–control study showed that siphon calcifications were not associated with a ruptured aneurysm status [68].

4.2. Prevalent and Incident Stroke

Many studies have demonstrated that siphon calcifications are independently associated with the stroke presence and incident strokes [38,69,70,72,73,74,76,77,79,81,84,86,88,90,92,93,94,95,97]. In 1975, Scotti et al. investigated over 5000 skull radiographs. They found siphon calcifications to be associated with stroke, and intimal and medial patterns had a similar effect size, but separation was suboptimal on the radiographs [97]. The early CT studies were often in small samples [95]. A study in 175 acute ischemic stroke patients and 182 controls found an odds ratio (OR) of 3.17 (95%CI: 1.25–8.04) for siphon calcification [93]. In 156 consecutive TIA patients, the calcium score was significantly higher in those with recurrence after multivariable adjustment (aOR 1.25, 1.01–1.55) [81]. In 2014, Bos et al. [88] demonstrated in 2323 stroke-free persons that larger siphon calcification volumes were related to a higher risk of incident stroke. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) per SD increase in calcification volume was 1.43 (95%CI: 1.04–1.96). Later, the calcifications were visually scored and associated with incident stroke (aHR for intimal: 2.11, lamina: 2.66, and mixed subtype: 2.57) [38]. Some data suggest sex-specific effects. In a study with 1184 women and 983 men, siphon calcification was associated with a higher risk of stroke (aHR 1.40, 95%CI: 1.03–1.90) in women, but not in men [76]. The overall conclusion is that there is substantial evidence that siphon calcification is independently associated with stroke [69,70,73,79,84,90,92,94], especially for lamina calcifications [72,74,77,86].

4.3. White Matter Disease, Cortical Atrophy, Cognition, and Dementia

Several studies have investigated the association between siphon calcification and damage to brain tissue and/or cognitive function [36,37,49,75,80,86,87,91,92,96,99]. Siphon calcification is associated with cerebral atrophy, white matter lesions, impaired cognitive function, and incident dementia [99].
In 1977, in 173 patients with Parkinson’s disease, cerebral atrophy was shown to be associated with siphon medial calcification [96]. In 2008, in 65 consecutive patients, severe siphon calcification was associated with central atrophy [92]. In 159 ischemic stroke patients, Chung et al. [91] observed that siphon calcification was associated with periventricular white matter lesions (aOR 2.62, 95%CI: 1.24–5.53) and deep white matter lesions (aOR 3.25, 95%CI: 1.53–6.89). In 1458 stroke-free participants of the Rotterdam Study, it was shown that internal elastic lamina calcification, considered a proxy for arterial stiffness, was the leading mechanism explaining the link between blood pressure and cSVD [36].
Regarding cognition and clinical disease, in a large population study, Van den Beukel et al. showed that non-atherosclerotic siphon calcification increased the risk of incident dementia (the hazard more than doubled in the upper tertile), while atherosclerotic calcifications did not increase the risk of dementia [37]. Mediation analysis indicated that the risk of non-atherosclerotic calcification for dementia was mediated via white matter lesions. In 1992, this could not be confirmed among memory clinic patients, as siphon calcification was not associated with dementia [49], but the high prevalence of calcifications (95%) and selection bias (71% had mild cognitive impairment or dementia) may have played a role. Many other studies on siphon calcification severity support the association with a loss of cognition and dementia independent of beta amyloid [75,80,86,87,99].

4.4. Siphon Calcification and Clinical Interventions

In the MR CLEAN trial, including 500 stroke patients, post hoc analyses were performed that specifically focused on siphon calcification. It was found that stroke patients with a predominant medial calcification subtype benefited more from endovascular treatment that than those with intimal calcification [82]. An important explanation for this, at first sight, paradoxical finding may be found in the presence or absence of good cerebral collaterals. Indeed, the same investigators showed in 2701 stroke patients that patients with a predominant medial calcification subtype showed a collateral status that was comparable to patients without calcification [77], and that patients with intimal calcification were more likely to have good collaterals, which has been confirmed by some (e.g., [83]), but not all studies (e.g., [78]). Studies on whether siphon calcification is associated with recanalization success are inconclusive [71,85]. Overall, there is some evidence that the effect of stroke therapy is better in medial siphon calcification.

5. Therapeutic Options for Siphon Calcification

Under the assumption that siphon calcification plays a causal role in the development of brain diseases, it could be useful to slow calcification development. Theoretically, treatment and prevention of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and renal dysfunction may help, but trials are disappointing [100,101,102,103]. Another option is targeting the calcification itself, as already performed by Kramsch et al.’s study in monkeys, reported in Science in 1981 [104]. A recent meta-analysis showed that first-generation bisphosphonates had a beneficial effect on vascular calcification [105]. The most promising bisphosphonate is etidronate, for which two small RCTs are available [106,107]. The first study concerns 74 PXE patients, who were randomized to etidronate or a placebo. Etidronate slowed arterial calcification progression, which was further supported during post-trial access [108]. The second RCT [109] concerned 109 patients with hypercholesterolemia randomized for atorvastatin, etidronate, or both. The endpoint was the percentage change in maximal vessel wall thickness in the thoracic and abdominal aorta. In a post hoc analysis, it was shown that etidronate primarily reduced calcified abdominal aortic plaques.

6. Conclusions

Our proposal is that the bends of the siphon and the flexible distal part function to protect the brain, as suggested by Hunter in 1793 [11]. In the siphon, the most common structural abnormality is elastic lamina calcification, which is linked to an altered physiology and multiple adverse outcomes, such as stroke and dementia. Severe calcification of the distal carotid siphon may thus be an often-overlooked causal step in the process leading to cerebrovascular disease (Figure 3), in addition to upstream (aortic stiffening) [9] and downstream factors [110], such as pressure dissipation by the circle of Willis [10]. As it is possible that siphon calcification plays a causal role in the vicious circle of vascular stiffening, stroke and dementia research requires intervention studies that slow, prevent, or reverse siphon calcification.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.A.d.J., D.B., J.Z. and W.P.T.M.M.; methodology, P.A.d.J., D.B., J.Z., N.I.H. and W.P.T.M.M.; software, none; validation, none; formal analysis, none; investigation, none; resources, none; data curation, P.A.d.J.; writing—original draft preparation, P.A.d.J., D.B., J.Z. and W.P.T.M.M.; writing—review and editing, P.A.d.J., D.B., H.L.K., P.T.D., N.I.H., Y.M.R., W.S., J.Z. and W.P.T.M.M.; visualization, P.A.d.J.; supervision, W.P.T.M.M.; project administration, P.A.d.J. and N.I.H.; funding acquisition, none. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable for a review article.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable for a review article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable for a review article.

Conflicts of Interest

Pim A. de Jong declares that the Department of Radiology of the UMC Utrecht receives research support from Philips Healthcare. That support is not related to this review. Other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, C.; Pu, F.; Li, S.; Xie, S.; Fan, Y.; Li, D. Geometric classification of the carotid siphon: Association between geometry and stenoses. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 2013, 35, 385–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Stehbens, W.E. Pathology of the Cerebral Blood Vessels; C. V. Mosby: Maryland Heights, MO, USA, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  3. Masuoka, T.; Hayashi, N.; Hori, E.; Kuwayama, N.; Ohtani, O.; Endo, S. Distribution of internal elastic lamina and external elastic lamina in the internal carotid artery: Possible relationship with atherosclerosis. Neurol. Med. Chir. 2010, 50, 179–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hayashi, K.; Handa, H.; Nagasawa, S.; Okumura, A.; Moritake, K. Stiffness and elastic behavior of human intracranial and extracranial arteries. J. Biomech. 1980, 13, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bleys, R.L.; Cowen, T.; Groen, G.J.; Hillen, B. Perivascular nerves of the human basal cerebral arteries: II. Changes in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 1996, 16, 1048–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bleys, R.L.; Janssen, L.M.; Groen, G.J. The lateral sellar nerve plexus and its connections in humans. J. Neurosurg. 2001, 95, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. de Jong, P.A.; Bos, D.; Mali, W. Calcification Formation for Development, Defense, and Repair of the Human Body? J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 5691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Suzuki, N.; Hardebo, J.E. Anatomical basis for a parasympathetic and sensory innervation of the intracranial segment of the internal carotid artery in man. Possible implication for vascular headache. J. Neurol. Sci. 1991, 104, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chirinos, J.A.; Segers, P.; Hughes, T.; Townsend, R. Large-Artery Stiffness in Health and Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019, 74, 1237–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vrselja, Z.; Brkic, H.; Mrdenovic, S.; Radic, R.; Curic, G. Function of circle of Willis. J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 2014, 34, 578–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hunter, J. The Works of John Hunter, F.R.S. with Notes; Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green, and Longman: London, UK, 1837. [Google Scholar]
  12. Schubert, T.; Pansini, M.; Bieri, O.; Stippich, C.; Wetzel, S.; Schaedelin, S.; von Hessling, A.; Santini, F. Attenuation of blood flow pulsatility along the Atlas slope: A physiologic property of the distal vertebral artery? AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2015, 36, 562–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Carraro, M.; Negandhi, J.; Kuthubutheen, J.; Propst, E.J.; Kus, L.; Lin, V.Y.; Harrison, R.V. Attenuating Cardiac Pulsations within the Cochlea: Structure and Function of Tortuous Vessels Feeding Stria Vascularis. ISRN Otolaryngol. 2013, 2013, 941757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Aghilinejad, A.; Amlani, F.; King, K.S.; Pahlevan, N.M. Dynamic Effects of Aortic Arch Stiffening on Pulsatile Energy Transmission to Cerebral Vasculature as A Determinant of Brain-Heart Coupling. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 8784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chirinos, J.A. Textbook of Arterial Stiffness and Pulsatile Hemodynamics in Health and Disease; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  16. Schubert, T.; Santini, F.; Stalder, A.F.; Bock, J.; Meckel, S.; Bonati, L.; Markl, M.; Wetzel, S. Dampening of blood-flow pulsatility along the carotid siphon: Does form follow function? AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2011, 32, 1107–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. van Tuijl, R.J.; Ruigrok, Y.M.; Velthuis, B.K.; van der Schaaf, I.C.; Rinkel, G.J.E.; Zwanenburg, J.J.M. Velocity Pulsatility and Arterial Distensibility Along the Internal Carotid Artery. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2020, 9, e016883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. van Tuijl, R.J.; Ruigrok, Y.M.; Geurts, L.J.; van der Schaaf, I.C.; Biessels, G.J.; Rinkel, G.J.E.; Velthuis, B.K.; Zwanenburg, J.J.M. Does the Internal Carotid Artery Attenuate Blood-Flow Pulsatility in Small Vessel Disease? A 7 T 4D-Flow MRI Study. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2022, 56, 527–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bartstra, J.W.; van Tuijl, R.J.; de Jong, P.A.; Mali, W.; van der Schaaf, I.C.; Ruigrok, Y.M.; Rinkel, G.J.E.; Velthuis, B.K.; Spiering, W.; Zwanenburg, J.J.M. Pulsatility Attenuation along the Carotid Siphon in Pseudoxanthoma Elasticum. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2021, 42, 2030–2033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kranenburg, G.; de Jong, P.A.; Mali, W.P.; Attrach, M.; Visseren, F.L.; Spiering, W. Prevalence and severity of arterial calcifications in pseudoxanthoma elasticum (PXE) compared to hospital controls. Novel insights into the vascular phenotype of PXE. Atherosclerosis 2017, 256, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Harmsen, I.M.; Kok, M.; Visseren, F.L.; Spiering, W.; de Jong, P.A. High prevalence of breast arterial calcification in pseudoxanthoma elasticum (PXE)—A nationwide study in the Netherlands. Vasc. Med. 2024, 29, 716–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kauw, F.; Kranenburg, G.; Kappelle, L.J.; Hendrikse, J.; Koek, H.L.; Visseren, F.L.J.; Mali, W.P.T.; de Jong, P.A.; Spiering, W. Cerebral disease in a nationwide Dutch pseudoxanthoma elasticum cohort with a systematic review of the literature. J. Neurol. Sci. 2017, 373, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sunmonu, N.A. Multiple Cerebrovascular Insults in Pseudoxanthoma Elasticum. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2021, 30, 105524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bartstra, J.W.; van den Beukel, T.; Kranenburg, G.; Geurts, L.J.; den Harder, A.M.; Witkamp, T.; Wolterink, J.M.; Zwanenburg, J.J.M.; van Valen, E.; Koek, H.L.; et al. Increased Intracranial Arterial Pulsatility and Microvascular Brain Damage in Pseudoxanthoma Elasticum. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2024, 45, 386–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kockelkoren, R.; De Vis, J.B.; de Jong, P.A.; Vernooij, M.W.; Mali, W.; Hendrikse, J.; Schiestl, T.; Pellikaan, K.; van der Lugt, A.; Bos, D. Intracranial Carotid Artery Calcification From Infancy to Old Age. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018, 72, 582–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Vos, A.; Van Hecke, W.; Spliet, W.G.; Goldschmeding, R.; Isgum, I.; Kockelkoren, R.; Bleys, R.L.; Mali, W.P.; de Jong, P.A.; Vink, A. Predominance of Nonatherosclerotic Internal Elastic Lamina Calcification in the Intracranial Internal Carotid Artery. Stroke 2016, 47, 221–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Stehbens, W.E. Experimental arterial loops and arterial atrophy. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 1986, 44, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fisher, C.M.; Gore, I.; Okabe, N.; White, P.D. Calcification of the carotid siphon. Circulation 1965, 32, 538–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Di Chiro, G.; Libow, L.S. Carotid siphon calcification and cerebral blood flow in the healthy aged male. Radiology 1971, 99, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lindbom, A. Arteriosclerosis and arterial thrombosis in the lower limb; a roentgenological study. Acta Radiol. Suppl. 1950, 80, 1–80. [Google Scholar]
  31. Woodcock, R.J., Jr.; Goldstein, J.H.; Kallmes, D.F.; Cloft, H.J.; Phillips, C.D. Angiographic correlation of CT calcification in the carotid siphon. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 1999, 20, 495–499. [Google Scholar]
  32. Babiarz, L.S.; Yousem, D.M.; Wasserman, B.A.; Wu, C.; Bilker, W.; Beauchamp, N.J., Jr. Cavernous carotid artery calcification and white matter ischemia. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2003, 24, 872–877. [Google Scholar]
  33. Bos, D.; Ikram, M.A.; Elias-Smale, S.E.; Krestin, G.P.; Hofman, A.; Witteman, J.C.; van der Lugt, A.; Vernooij, M.W. Calcification in major vessel beds relates to vascular brain disease. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2011, 31, 2331–2337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Agatston, A.S.; Janowitz, W.R.; Hildner, F.J.; Zusmer, N.R.; Viamonte, M., Jr.; Detrano, R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1990, 15, 827–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kockelkoren, R.; Vos, A.; Van Hecke, W.; Vink, A.; Bleys, R.L.; Verdoorn, D.; Mali, W.P.; Hendrikse, J.; Koek, H.L.; de Jong, P.A.; et al. Computed Tomographic Distinction of Intimal and Medial Calcification in the Intracranial Internal Carotid Artery. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0168360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Melgarejo, J.D.; Vernooij, M.W.; Ikram, M.A.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Bos, D. Intracranial Carotid Arteriosclerosis Mediates the Association Between Blood Pressure and Cerebral Small Vessel Disease. Hypertension 2023, 80, 618–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. van den Beukel, T.C.; Wolters, F.J.; Siebert, U.; Spiering, W.; Ikram, M.A.; Vernooij, M.W.; de Jong, P.A.; Bos, D. Intracranial arteriosclerosis and the risk of dementia: A population-based cohort study. Alzheimers Dement. 2024, 20, 869–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. van den Beukel, T.C.; van der Toorn, J.E.; Vernooij, M.W.; Kavousi, M.; Akyildiz, A.C.; de Jong, P.A.; van der Lugt, A.; Ikram, M.K.; Bos, D. Morphological Subtypes of Intracranial Internal Carotid Artery Arteriosclerosis and the Risk of Stroke. Stroke 2022, 53, 1339–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bos, D.; van der Rijk, M.J.; Geeraedts, T.E.; Hofman, A.; Krestin, G.P.; Witteman, J.C.; van der Lugt, A.; Ikram, M.A.; Vernooij, M.W. Intracranial carotid artery atherosclerosis: Prevalence and risk factors in the general population. Stroke 2012, 43, 1878–1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Peeters, M.T.J.; Houben, R.; Postma, A.A.; van Oostenbrugge, R.J.; Schurgers, L.J.; Staals, J. Vitamin K Antagonist Use and Risk for Intracranial Carotid Artery Calcification in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Front. Neurol. 2019, 10, 1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lucci, C.; Rissanen, I.; van den Beukel, T.C.; Takx, R.; de Jong, P.A.; Hendrikse, J.; Geerlings, M.I. Risk Factors for Medial and Intimal Intracranial Internal Carotid Artery Calcification in Men and Women with Cardiovascular Disease: The UCC-SMART Study. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2024, 53, 734–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gozdalski, J.; Nowicki, T.K.; Kwarciany, M.; Kowalczyk, K.; Narkiewicz, K.; Gasecki, D. Aortic Stiffness Is Independently Associated with Intracranial Carotid Artery Calcification in Patients with Ischemic Stroke. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2024, 53, 216–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Oge, D.D.; Topcuoglu, M.A.; Gultekin Zaim, O.B.; Gumeler, E.; Arsava, E.M. The relationship between bone health and type of intracranial internal carotid calcifications in patients with ischemic stroke. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2024, 243, 108360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Singh, S.S.; van der Toorn, J.E.; Sijbrands, E.J.G.; de Rijke, Y.B.; Kavousi, M.; Bos, D. Lipoprotein(a) is associated with a larger systemic burden of arterial calcification. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2023, 24, 1102–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Del Brutto, O.H.; Del Brutto, V.J.; Mera, R.M.; Pérez, P.; Recalde, B.Y.; Costa, A.F.; Romano, J.G.; Sedler, M.J. Prevalence and Correlates of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults of Amerindian Ancestry. The Three Villages Study. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2020, 29, 105135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Del Brutto, O.H.; Mera, R.M.; Costa, A.F.; Peñaherrera, E.; Peñaherrera, R.; Zambrano, M. Arterial Stiffness is Independently Associated with Severity of Carotid Siphon Calcifications in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: The Atahualpa Project. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2018, 27, 2494–2499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Voigt, S.; van Os, H.; van Walderveen, M.; van der Schaaf, I.C.; Kappelle, L.J.; Broersen, A.; Velthuis, B.K.; de Jong, P.A.; Kockelkoren, R.; Kruyt, N.D.; et al. Sex differences in intracranial and extracranial atherosclerosis in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Int. J. Stroke 2021, 16, 385–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. de Weert, T.T.; Cakir, H.; Rozie, S.; Cretier, S.; Meijering, E.; Dippel, D.W.; van der Lugt, A. Intracranial internal carotid artery calcifications: Association with vascular risk factors and ischemic cerebrovascular disease. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2009, 30, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Golüke, N.M.S.; de Brouwer, E.J.M.; de Jonghe, A.; Claus, J.J.; Staekenborg, S.S.; Emmelot-Vonk, M.H.; de Jong, P.A.; Koek, H.L. Intracranial artery calcifications: Risk factors and association with cardiovascular disease and cognitive function. J. Neuroradiol. 2022, 49, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Vos, A.; Kockelkoren, R.; de Vis, J.B.; van der Schouw, Y.T.; van der Schaaf, I.C.; Velthuis, B.K.; Mali, W.; de Jong, P.A. Risk factors for atherosclerotic and medial arterial calcification of the intracranial internal carotid artery. Atherosclerosis 2018, 276, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Olatunji, R.B.; Adekanmi, A.J.; Ogunseyinde, A.O. Intracranial Arterial Calcification in Black Africans with Acute Ischaemic Stroke. Cerebrovasc. Dis. Extra 2018, 8, 26–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Del Brutto, O.H.; Mera, R.M. The Role of Brachial Pulse Pressure as an Indicator of Intracranial Atherosclerosis: The Atahualpa Project. High. Blood Press. Cardiovasc. Prev. 2017, 24, 419–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sedaghat, S.; Hoorn, E.J.; Ikram, M.A.; Koop-Nieuwelink, C.; Kavousi, M.; Franco, O.H.; van der Lugt, A.; Vernooij, M.W.; Bos, D. Kidney Function and Arterial Calcification in Major Vascular Beds. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2019, 8, e010930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yilmaz, A.; Akpinar, E.; Topcuoglu, M.A.; Arsava, E.M. Clinical and imaging features associated with intracranial internal carotid artery calcifications in patients with ischemic stroke. Neuroradiology 2015, 57, 501–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Iwasa, Y.; Otsubo, S.; Nomoto, K.; Yashiro, N.; Yajima, A.; Kimata, N.; Akiba, T.; Nitta, K. Prevalence of intracranial artery calcification in hemodialysis patients--a case-control study. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2012, 44, 1223–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mak, H.K.; Wong, C.W.; Yau, K.K.; Wong, W.M.; Gu, J.; Khong, P.L.; Chan, B.P. Computed tomography evaluation of intracranial atherosclerosis in Chinese patients with transient ischemic attack or minor ischemic stroke--its distribution and association with vascular risk factors. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2009, 18, 158–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Adams, H.H.; Ikram, M.A.; Vernooij, M.W.; van Dijk, A.C.; Hofman, A.; Uitterlinden, A.G.; van Duijn, C.M.; Koudstaal, P.J.; Franco, O.H.; van der Lugt, A.; et al. Heritability and Genome-Wide Association Analyses of Intracranial Carotid Artery Calcification: The Rotterdam Study. Stroke 2016, 47, 912–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. de Onofre, N.M.L.; Vizzotto, M.B.; Wanzeler, A.M.V.; Tiecher, P.; Arús, N.A.; Arriola Guillén, L.E.; da Silveira, H.L.D. Association between internal carotid artery calcifications detected as incidental findings and clinical characteristics associated with atherosclerosis: A dental volumetric tomography study. Eur. J. Radiol. 2021, 145, 110045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. AlSakr, A.; Blanchard, S.; Wong, P.; Thyvalikakath, T.; Hamada, Y. Association between intracranial carotid artery calcifications and periodontitis: A cone-beam computed tomography study. J. Periodontol. 2021, 92, 1402–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Zhang, S.; Wang, N.; Chen, L.; Zhang, P.; Shen, L.; Huang, S.; Zhang, C.; Deng, B. Serum Aldosterone Is Associated with Cerebral Artery Atherosclerosis and Calcification. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2019, 28, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Vojinovic, D.; van der Lee, S.J.; van Duijn, C.M.; Vernooij, M.W.; Kavousi, M.; Amin, N.; Demirkan, A.; Ikram, M.A.; van der Lugt, A.; Bos, D. Metabolic profiling of intra- and extracranial carotid artery atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 2018, 272, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kim, J.M.; Park, K.Y.; Shin, D.W.; Park, M.S.; Kwon, O.S. Relation of serum homocysteine levels to cerebral artery calcification and atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 2016, 254, 200–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chen, X.Y.; Lam, W.W.; Ng, H.K.; Fan, Y.H.; Wong, K.S. The frequency and determinants of calcification in intracranial arteries in Chinese patients who underwent computed tomography examinations. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2006, 21, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. van der Toorn, J.E.; Rueda-Ochoa, O.L.; van der Schaft, N.; Vernooij, M.W.; Ikram, M.A.; Bos, D.; Kavousi, M. Arterial calcification at multiple sites: Sex-specific cardiovascular risk profiles and mortality risk-the Rotterdam Study. BMC Med. 2020, 18, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Mazzacane, F.; Del Bello, B.; Ferrari, F.; Persico, A.; Rognone, E.; Pichiecchio, A.; Padovani, A.; Cavallini, A.; Morotti, A.; Arba, F. Intracranial carotid artery calcification morphology differs in patients with lacunar and nonlacunar acute ischemic strokes. Eur. J. Neurol. 2023, 30, 963–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. He, X.W.; Zhao, R.; Li, G.F.; Zheng, B.; Wu, Y.L.; Shi, Y.H.; Liu, Y.S.; Zhuang, M.T.; Yin, J.W.; Cui, G.H.; et al. Lack of Correlation Between Intracranial Carotid Artery Modified Woodcock Calcification Score and Prognosis of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke After Intravenous Thrombolysis. Front. Neurol. 2019, 10, 696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Engel, A.; Song, L.; Rauschenbach, L.; Gümüs, M.; Santos, A.N.; Dinger, T.F.; Darkwah Oppong, M.; Li, Y.; Gembruch, O.; Ahmadipour, Y.; et al. Impact of Carotid Siphon Calcification on the Course and Outcome of Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Stroke 2024, 55, 2305–2314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Kamphuis, M.J.; van der Kamp, L.T.; Lette, E.; Rinkel, G.J.E.; Vergouwen, M.D.I.; van der Schaaf, I.C.; de Jong, P.A.; Ruigrok, Y.M. Intracranial arterial calcification in patients with unruptured and ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Eur. Radiol. 2024, 34, 7517–7525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhu, J.; Liu, Q.; Zhuang, Y.; Wei, R.; Sun, Y.; Wang, H.; Song, B. Intracranial Carotid Artery Calcification Subtype in Patients with Anterior Circulation Acute Ischemic Stroke Undergoing Intravenous Thrombolysis. Neurol. India 2023, 71, 1205–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Shimoyama, T.; Gaj, S.; Nakamura, K.; Kovi, S.; Man, S.; Uchino, K. Quantitative CTA vascular calcification, atherosclerosis burden, and stroke mechanism in patients with ischemic stroke. J. Neurol. Sci. 2023, 449, 120667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Xia, J.; Gao, H.; Zhang, K.; Gao, B.; Li, T.; Wang, Z. Effects of endovascular recanalization on symptomatic non-acute occlusion of intracranial arteries. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 4550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Del Brutto, O.H.; Mera, R.M. Carotid siphon calcifications are associated with all-cause mortality: Results from the Atahualpa Project. Vasc. Med. 2022, 27, 487–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hou, D.; Yang, X.; Wang, Y.; Huang, S.; Tang, Y.; Wu, D. Carotid Siphon Calcification Predicts the Symptomatic Progression in Branch Artery Disease With Intracranial Artery Stenosis-Brief Report. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2022, 42, 1094–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Shen, Y.; Dong, Z.; Xu, G.; Zhong, J.; Pan, P.; Chen, Z.; Shi, H. Correlation Between Intracranial Carotid Artery Calcification and Prognosis of Acute Ischemic Stroke After Intravenous Thrombolysis. Front. Neurol. 2022, 13, 740656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Rahmani, F.; Nguyen, M.; Chen, C.D.; McKay, N.; Dincer, A.; Joseph-Mathurin, N.; Chen, G.; Liu, J.; Orlowski, H.L.P.; Morris, J.C.; et al. Intracranial internal carotid artery calcification is not predictive of future cognitive decline. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 2022, 14, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. van der Toorn, J.E.; Bos, D.; Arshi, B.; Leening, M.J.G.; Vernooij, M.W.; Ikram, M.A.; Ikram, M.K.; Kavousi, M. Arterial calcification at different sites and prediction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease among women and men. Atherosclerosis 2021, 337, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Luijten, S.P.R.; van der Donk, S.C.; Compagne, K.C.J.; Yo, L.S.F.; Sprengers, M.E.S.; Majoie, C.; Roos, Y.; van Zwam, W.H.; van Oostenbrugge, R.; Dippel, D.W.J.; et al. Intracranial carotid artery calcification subtype and collaterals in patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy. Atherosclerosis 2021, 337, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kauw, F.; de Jong, P.A.; Takx, R.A.P.; de Jong, H.; Kappelle, L.J.; Velthuis, B.K.; Dankbaar, J.W. Effect of intravenous thrombolysis in stroke depends on pattern of intracranial internal carotid artery calcification. Atherosclerosis 2021, 316, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Pektezel, M.Y.; Arsava, E.M.; Gocmen, R.; Topcuoglu, M.A. Intracerebral hematoma expansion and intracranial internal carotid artery calcifications. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2021, 200, 106361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Cho, N.J.; Park, S.; Lee, E.Y.; Oh, S.W.; Oh, H.G.; Gil, H.W. Association of Intracranial Artery Calcification with Cognitive Impairment in Hemodialysis Patients. Med. Sci. Monit. 2019, 25, 5036–5043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kong, W.Y.; Tan, B.Y.; Ellis, E.S.; Ngiam, N.J.; Goh, W.G.; Sharma, V.K.; Chan, B.P.; Yeo, L.L. Intracranial Artery Calcium Burden Predicts Recurrent Cerebrovascular Events in Transient Ischaemic Attack Patients. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2019, 28, 2332–2336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Compagne, K.C.J.; Clephas, P.R.D.; Majoie, C.; Roos, Y.; Berkhemer, O.A.; van Oostenbrugge, R.J.; van Zwam, W.H.; van Es, A.; Dippel, D.W.J.; van der Lugt, A.; et al. Intracranial Carotid Artery Calcification and Effect of Endovascular Stroke Treatment. Stroke 2018, 49, 2961–2968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Gocmen, R.; Arsava, E.M.; Oguz, K.K.; Topcuoglu, M.A. Atherosclerotic intracranial internal carotid artery calcification and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Atherosclerosis 2018, 270, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Tábuas-Pereira, M.; Sargento-Freitas, J.; Silva, F.; Parra, J.; Mendes, P.; Seara, V.; Mesquita, M.; Baptista, M.; Cordeiro, G.; Cunha, L. Intracranial Internal Carotid Artery Wall Calcification in Ischemic Strokes Treated with Thrombolysis. Eur. Neurol. 2018, 79, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Hernández-Pérez, M.; Bos, D.; Dorado, L.; Pellikaan, K.; Vernooij, M.W.; López-Cancio, E.; Pérez de la Ossa, N.; Gomis, M.; Castaño, C.; Munuera, J.; et al. Intracranial Carotid Artery Calcification Relates to Recanalization and Clinical Outcome After Mechanical Thrombectomy. Stroke 2017, 48, 342–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Del Brutto, O.H.; Mera, R.M.; Sullivan, L.J.; Zambrano, M.; King, N.R. Calcifications in the carotid siphon inversely associate with cognitive performance in stroke-free community dwellers living in rural Ecuador (The Atahualpa Project). Int. J. Stroke 2016, 11, 935–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Kao, H.W.; Liou, M.; Chung, H.W.; Liu, H.S.; Tsai, P.H.; Chiang, S.W.; Chou, M.C.; Peng, G.S.; Huang, G.S.; Hsu, H.H.; et al. High Agatston Calcium Score of Intracranial Carotid Artery: A Significant Risk Factor for Cognitive Impairment. Medicine 2015, 94, e1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Bos, D.; Portegies, M.L.; van der Lugt, A.; Bos, M.J.; Koudstaal, P.J.; Hofman, A.; Krestin, G.P.; Franco, O.H.; Vernooij, M.W.; Ikram, M.A. Intracranial carotid artery atherosclerosis and the risk of stroke in whites: The Rotterdam Study. JAMA Neurol. 2014, 71, 405–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Lin, T.C.; Chao, T.H.; Shieh, Y.; Lee, T.H.; Chang, Y.J.; Lee, J.D.; Peng, T.I.; Chang, K.C.; Liou, C.W.; Chang, T.Y.; et al. The impact of intracranial carotid artery calcification on the development of thrombolysis-induced intracerebral hemorrhage. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2013, 22, e455–e462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hong, N.R.; Seo, H.S.; Lee, Y.H.; Kim, J.H.; Seol, H.Y.; Lee, N.J.; Suh, S.I. The correlation between carotid siphon calcification and lacunar infarction. Neuroradiology 2011, 53, 643–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Chung, P.W.; Park, K.Y.; Moon, H.S.; Kim, Y.B.; Youn, Y.C.; Byun, J.S.; Kwon, O.S. Intracranial internal carotid artery calcification: A representative for cerebral artery calcification and association with white matter hyperintensities. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2010, 30, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Erbay, S.; Han, R.; Aftab, M.; Zou, K.H.; Polak, J.F.; Bhadelia, R.A. Is intracranial atherosclerosis an independent risk factor for cerebral atrophy? A retrospective evaluation. BMC Neurol. 2008, 8, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Chen, X.Y.; Lam, W.W.; Ng, H.K.; Fan, Y.H.; Wong, K.S. Intracranial artery calcification: A newly identified risk factor of ischemic stroke. J. Neuroimaging 2007, 17, 300–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Erbay, S.; Han, R.; Baccei, S.; Krakov, W.; Zou, K.H.; Bhadelia, R.; Polak, J. Intracranial carotid artery calcification on head CT and its association with ischemic changes on brain MRI in patients presenting with stroke-like symptoms: Retrospective analysis. Neuroradiology 2007, 49, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Taoka, T.; Iwasaki, S.; Nakagawa, H.; Sakamoto, M.; Fukusumi, A.; Takayama, K.; Wada, T.; Myochin, K.; Hirohashi, S.; Kichikawa, K. Evaluation of arteriosclerotic changes in the intracranial carotid artery using the calcium score obtained on plain cranial computed tomography scan: Correlation with angiographic changes and clinical outcome. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 2006, 30, 624–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Schneider, E.; Fischer, P.A.; Becker, H.; Hacker, H.; Pencz, A.; Jacobi, P. Relationship between arteriosclerosis and cerebral atrophy in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurol. 1977, 217, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Scotti, G.; De Grandi, C. Intimal and medial calcifications of the carotid siphon and cerebrovascular disease. Radiology 1975, 116, 667–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Hussein, H.M.; Zacharatos, H.; Cordina, S.; Lakshminarayan, K.; Ezzeddine, M.A. Intracranial vascular calcification is protective from vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2014, 23, 2687–2693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Streiber, A.M.; van den Beukel, T.C.; Vom Hofe, I.; Neitzel, J.; Vernooij, M.W.; Bos, D.; Vinke, E.J. Arterial calcification in the heart-brain axis and cognitive performance over time. Alzheimers Dement. 2025, 21, e14374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Eggink, E.; Moll van Charante, E.P.; van Gool, W.A.; Richard, E. A Population Perspective on Prevention of Dementia. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Nasrallah, I.M.; Pajewski, N.M.; Auchus, A.P.; Chelune, G.; Cheung, A.K.; Cleveland, M.L.; Coker, L.H.; Crowe, M.G.; Cushman, W.C.; Cutler, J.A.; et al. Association of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control With Cerebral White Matter Lesions. Jama 2019, 322, 524–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Moll van Charante, E.P.; Richard, E.; Eurelings, L.S.; van Dalen, J.W.; Ligthart, S.A.; van Bussel, E.F.; Hoevenaar-Blom, M.P.; Vermeulen, M.; van Gool, W.A. Effectiveness of a 6-year multidomain vascular care intervention to prevent dementia (preDIVA): A cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016, 388, 797–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Webb, A.J.S.; Lawson, A.; Wartolowska, K.; Mazzucco, S.; Rothwell, P.M. Aortic Stiffness, Pulse Pressure, and Cerebral Pulsatility Progress Despite Best Medical Management: The OXVASC Cohort. Stroke 2022, 53, 1310–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Kramsch, D.M.; Aspen, A.J.; Rozler, L.J. Atherosclerosis: Prevention by agents not affecting abnormal levels of blood lipids. Science 1981, 213, 1511–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Xu, W.; Lu, G.; Gong, L.; Tang, W.; Liu, X.; Yang, Q.; Jiang, W.; Liu, X.; Li, X. Non-nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates and nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates for the treatment of atherosclerosis and vascular calcification: A meta-analysis. Medicine 2024, 103, e38404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Kranenburg, G.; de Jong, P.A.; Bartstra, J.W.; Lagerweij, S.J.; Lam, M.G.; Ossewaarde-van Norel, J.; Risseeuw, S.; van Leeuwen, R.; Imhof, S.M.; Verhaar, H.J.; et al. Etidronate for Prevention of Ectopic Mineralization in Patients With Pseudoxanthoma Elasticum. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018, 71, 1117–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Bartstra, J.W.; de Jong, P.A.; Kranenburg, G.; Wolterink, J.M.; Isgum, I.; Wijsman, A.; Wolf, B.; den Harder, A.M.; Mali, W.; Spiering, W. Etidronate halts systemic arterial calcification in pseudoxanthoma elasticum. Atherosclerosis 2020, 292, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Harmsen, I.M.; van den Beukel, T.; Kok, M.; Visseren, F.L.J.; de Jong, P.A.; Papapoulos, S.E.; Spiering, W. Cyclical Etidronate Reduces the Progression of Arterial Calcifications in Patients with Pseudoxanthoma Elasticum: A 6-Year Prospective Observational Study. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 4612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Kawahara, T.; Nishikawa, M.; Kawahara, C.; Inazu, T.; Sakai, K.; Suzuki, G. Atorvastatin, etidronate, or both in patients at high risk for atherosclerotic aortic plaques: A randomized, controlled trial. Circulation 2013, 127, 2327–2335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Arts, T.; Onkenhout, L.P.; Amier, R.P.; van der Geest, R.; van Harten, T.; Kappelle, J.; Kuipers, S.; van Osch, M.J.P.; van Bavel, E.T.; Biessels, G.J.; et al. Non-Invasive Assessment of Damping of Blood Flow Velocity Pulsatility in Cerebral Arteries With MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2022, 55, 1785–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Structure of the carotid siphon. This illustrates the general shape of the siphon, although there is personal variation and even individual shapes, such as C, V, and S-shapes, which have been recognized. Please note that C2 and C3 are in the skull base and cannot distend, while C4 and C5 are within venous blood without attachment and thus more flexible. In addition to the form (bends), the C4 and C5 parts may dampen pulsatility.
Figure 1. Structure of the carotid siphon. This illustrates the general shape of the siphon, although there is personal variation and even individual shapes, such as C, V, and S-shapes, which have been recognized. Please note that C2 and C3 are in the skull base and cannot distend, while C4 and C5 are within venous blood without attachment and thus more flexible. In addition to the form (bends), the C4 and C5 parts may dampen pulsatility.
Jpm 15 00356 g001
Figure 2. Bilateral circular calcifications of the carotid siphon.
Figure 2. Bilateral circular calcifications of the carotid siphon.
Jpm 15 00356 g002
Figure 3. From siphon arteriosclerosis to symptomatic disease. A schematic overview of the literature on siphon calcification and a hypothesized temporal link. Siphon calcifications are associated with increased arterial pulsatility, lacunar infarctions, white matter disease and loss of cognition, incident dementia, and stroke. This suggests that targeting calcific arteriosclerosis of the siphon could aid personalized medicine of brain diseases.
Figure 3. From siphon arteriosclerosis to symptomatic disease. A schematic overview of the literature on siphon calcification and a hypothesized temporal link. Siphon calcifications are associated with increased arterial pulsatility, lacunar infarctions, white matter disease and loss of cognition, incident dementia, and stroke. This suggests that targeting calcific arteriosclerosis of the siphon could aid personalized medicine of brain diseases.
Jpm 15 00356 g003
Table 1. Determinants of carotid siphon calcification.
Table 1. Determinants of carotid siphon calcification.
AuthorPopulationAssociation with Calcification Presence, Calcification Severity, or Calcification Pattern
Lucci C, 2024 [41]475 cardiovascular patientsIntimal calcification: older age, systolic blood pressure (women), glucose levels (women), current smoking (men), eGFR ≤60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (men). Medial calcification: older age, vitamin K antagonists (women), lipid-lowering drugs (women)
Gozdalski J, 2024 [42]65 patients with ischemic strokeAge, diabetes, smoking, carotid-femoral PWV (higher in medial compared to intimal pattern)
Oge DD, 2024 [43]250 stroke patientsLower bone density (T-score) only with intimal calcification pattern. Intimal: age, male, diabetes, albumin. Medial: age, male, diabetes, coronary artery disease, albumin
Singh SS, 2023 [44]2354-member general population sampleLipoprotein A
Del Brutto OH, 2020 [45]581 Amerindian community members aged ≥60 years Increasing age, high fasting blood glucose, >10 enlarged basal ganglia-perivascular spaces and non-lacunar strokes
Voigt S, 2021 [47]1397 stroke patientsMale gender only for intimal pattern
Golüke NMS, 2022 [49]1992 memory clinic patientsAge, male (intima), diabetes mellitus (medial), hypertension (intimal), smoking (intimal), stroke
Peeters MTJ, 2019 [40]376 patients with nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhageAge
Sedaghat S, 2019 [53]2241-member general populationLower eGFR and a higher albumin-to-creatinine ratio
de Onofre NML, 2021 [58]284 dental clinic patients aged >40 yearsMore missing teeth, older age, hypertension, diabetes, coagulation disorders, antihypertensive drugs, C4 segment
AlSakr A, 2021 [59]208 dental clinic patients aged <30 yearsPeriodontitis, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, increasing age, male gender, cardiovascular history
Kockelkoren R, 2018 [25]1868 trauma patientsAge
Zhang S, 2019 [1]207 acute ischemic stroke patientsAldosterone
Vos A, 2018 [50]1132 stroke patientsAge, pulse pressure, and family history (any calcification). Intimal: smoking, hypertension. Medial: diabetes, previous vascular disease
Del Brutto OH, 2018 [46]437 Amerindian community members aged ≥60 years Carotid-femoral PWV
Vojinovic D, 2018 [61]1111-member general population3-hydroxybutyrate
Olatunji RB, 2018 [51]130 adults with acute ischemic strokeAge, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, alcohol use
Del Brutto OH, 2017 [52]663 adults from general populationBrachial pulse pressure
Kim JM, 2016 [62]1193 patients with infarction or TIASerum homocysteine
Adams HH, 2016 [57]2034-member general population47% heritability, locus 9p21.3 (rs1537372), 11p11.2 (rs11038042)
Yilmaz A, 2015 [54]319 ischemic stroke patientsAge, diabetes, coronary artery disease (univariate hypertension and inverse relation with smoking)
Bos D, 2012 [39]2495-member general populationAge, cardiovascular history, excessive alcohol intake (men), smoking (men), diabetes (women), hypertension (women), less obesity (women)
Iwasa Y, 2012 [55]107 hemodialysis patients, 43 controlsHemodialysis
Mak HK, 2009 [56]60 Chinese patients with TIA or minor strokeAge, diabetes
de Weert TT, 2009 [48]406 patients with ischemic cerebrovascular diseaseAge, male, smoking, hypercholesterolemia, history of cardiovascular disease
Chen XY, 2006 [63]490 patients referred for brain CTAge, history of ischemic stroke, white blood cell count
Table 2. Outcomes associated with carotid siphon calcification.
Table 2. Outcomes associated with carotid siphon calcification.
AuthorPopulationAssociation with Calcification Presence, Calcification Severity, or Calcification Pattern
Engel 2024 [67]716 patients with subarachnoid hemorrhageCalcification score was related to adverse outcome (aOR 4.06) and early ischemia (aOR 1.58). Calcification score was protective for vasospasm.
van der Toorn JE, 2020 [64]1239 females and 1118 males, general populationAll-cause mortality in males (aHR 1.34) and cardiovascular mortality in males (aHR 2.11) and females (aHR 1.95).
Kamphuis MJ, 2024 [68]150 with unruptured and 150 with ruptured aneurysmsSiphon calcifications are not associated with rupture status.
Zhu J, 2023 [69]207 patients with anterior circulation strokeMedial siphon calcification pattern is associated with poor stroke outcome (sOR: 7.418).
Van den Beukel T, 2024 [37]2339-member general population, stroke- and dementia-free Siphon calcification presence increased risk of incident dementia (aHR 1.53).
Shimoyama T, 2023 [70]375 acute ischemic stroke patientsCalcification volumes in the siphon associated with large artery stroke in younger patients (aOR; 2.89).
Xia J, 2023 [71]177 patients with non-acute occlusionSiphon calcification was associated with successful recanalization.
Mazzacane F, 2023 [65]485 ischemic stroke patientsIntimal calcification was associated with lacunar stroke etiology (aOR 2).
Del Brutto OH, 2022 [72]778 persons who underwent head CTVisual calcification score of moderate or severe was associated with all-cause mortality (aHR 1.82).
Hou D, 2022 [73]310 stroke patientsSiphon calcification presence and lower density was independently associated with stroke progression (aOR density 1.23).
Shen Y, 2022 [74]156 stroke patients who received IVTModified Woodcock score associated with poor stroke outcome (aOR = 1.35) and death (aOR = 2.41).
Rahmani F, 2022 [75]Case–control of 230 subjects who underwent PET/CTAgatston score of the siphon was not associated with cognitive decline.
Van den Beukel TC, 2022 [38]Population-based cohort of 2391 stroke-free participantsAll siphon calcification subtypes were associated with a higher risk of stroke (aHR intimal: 2.11, elastic lamina: 2.66, mixed 2.57).
Van der Toorn JE, 2021 [76]1184 women and 983 men, population cohortEspecially in women, siphon calcification score was associated with myocardial infarction (MI), other coronary heart disease mortality, and stroke (aHR women 1.62, men 1.26).
Luijten SPR, 2021 [77]2701 stroke patients who underwent EVTPatients with intimal siphon calcification pattern benefit more from an extensive collateral circulation in terms of outcome.
Kouw F, 2021 [78]982 stroke patientsIntravenous thrombolysis was significantly associated with favorable clinical outcome in medial siphon calcifications.
Pektezel MY [79]201 patients with intracerebral hematomaNo clear association with hematoma expansion, mortality, or adverse outcome.
Golüke N, 2021 [49]1992 memory clinic patientsNo independent association between siphon calcification (pattern or severity) and cognitive function.
He XW, 2019 [66]32 acute ischemic stroke patientsSiphon calcification severity was not independently associated with stroke severity, hemorrhagic transformation, functional outcome, or mortality.
Cho N, 2019 [80]69 patients with chronic kidney diseaseSiphon calcium score was not significantly associated with cognitive impairment (aOR 2.65 (0.49–16.04), but power was limited.
Kong WY, 2019 [81]156 consecutive TIA patientsA higher CT calcium score was significantly associated with recurrent ischemic events (aOR 1.25).
Compagne K, 2018 [82]500 stroke patients included in the MR CLEAN studySiphon medial calcification patients had better functional outcome with endovascular therapy (aOR 2.32) compared to those with intimal calcifications (aOR 0.82).
Gocmen R, 2018 [83]91 consecutive acute anterior circulation stroke patientsMedial dominance of siphon calcification tended to be associated with less early response to intravenous thrombolysis (p = 0.052), but not to later outcome or hemorrhagic transformation.
Tábuas-Pereira M, 2018 [84]396 consecutive ischemic stroke patientsSiphon calcification score was only associated with mortality (aOR 1.10), not with other adverse outcomes.
Hernández-Pérez M, 2017 [85]194 patients admitted to a stroke unitSiphon calcification associated with incomplete revascularization (aOR 0.73) and with poor outcome (aOR 1.31).
Del Brutto, 2016 [86]584 persons without previous strokeInverse relation between siphon calcification severity and cognition (adjusted Beta −2.04, −3.76 to −0.33).
Kao HW, 2015 [87]579 patients scanned for multiple indicationsLower cognitive function association with 100-point increment of siphon Agatston score (aOR 1.06).
Bos D, 2014 [88]2323 stroke-free persons Siphon calcification volume was related to incident stroke (aHR per SD 1.43).
Lin TC, 2013 [89]297 stroke patients Moderate to severe siphon calcification risk factor for hemorrhagic transformation (aOR 2.52).
Hong NR, 2011 [90]445 patients who underwent CT and MRI Carotid siphon calcification severity with lacunar infarcts (aOR 1.29, 1.15–1.45).
Chung PW, 2010 [91]159 acute ischemic stroke patientsSiphon calcification was associated with periventricular white matter lesions (aOR 2.62), deep white matter lesions (aOR 3.25), and lacunar infarcts (aOR 3.09).
Erbay S, 2008 [92]65 acute patients who underwent CT and MRISiphon calcification was associated with central atrophy (after adjustment for age), but not with cortical atrophy.
Chen XY, 2007 [93]175 stroke cases and 182 controlsAssociation between siphon calcification and ischemic stroke (aOR = 3.172).
Erbay S, 2007 [94]65 acute patients who underwent CT and MRISevere siphon calcification was associated with acute small vessel infarcts after multivariable adjustment (p = 0.002).
Taoka T, 2006 [95]72 patients with unenhanced CT and angiography N = 7 experienced a stroke. Mean calcium score of the no-stroke group was 88 (SD 171) and of the stroke group was 312 (SD 539).
Schneider E, 1977 [96]173 treated and untreated Parkinsonian patientsMedial calcification is associated with brain atrophy, but not with Parkinsonism.
Scotti G, 1975 [97]5570 patients who underwent skull radiographyBoth intimal and medial calcifications were associated with stroke occurrence, with a similar effect size.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

de Jong, P.A.; Bos, D.; Koek, H.L.; Deckers, P.T.; Harlianto, N.I.; Ruigrok, Y.M.; Spiering, W.; Zwanenburg, J.; Mali, W.P.T.M. The Carotid Siphon as a Pulsatility Modulator for Brain Protection: Role of Arterial Calcification Formation. J. Pers. Med. 2025, 15, 356. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15080356

AMA Style

de Jong PA, Bos D, Koek HL, Deckers PT, Harlianto NI, Ruigrok YM, Spiering W, Zwanenburg J, Mali WPTM. The Carotid Siphon as a Pulsatility Modulator for Brain Protection: Role of Arterial Calcification Formation. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2025; 15(8):356. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15080356

Chicago/Turabian Style

de Jong, Pim A., Daniel Bos, Huiberdina L. Koek, Pieter T. Deckers, Netanja I. Harlianto, Ynte M. Ruigrok, Wilko Spiering, Jaco Zwanenburg, and Willem P.Th.M. Mali. 2025. "The Carotid Siphon as a Pulsatility Modulator for Brain Protection: Role of Arterial Calcification Formation" Journal of Personalized Medicine 15, no. 8: 356. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15080356

APA Style

de Jong, P. A., Bos, D., Koek, H. L., Deckers, P. T., Harlianto, N. I., Ruigrok, Y. M., Spiering, W., Zwanenburg, J., & Mali, W. P. T. M. (2025). The Carotid Siphon as a Pulsatility Modulator for Brain Protection: Role of Arterial Calcification Formation. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 15(8), 356. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15080356

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop