Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The shows the results of a new endoscopic technique for ab interno surgery of the trabecular meshwork

The title should be changed because they are not preliminary results but cases series

Fig 5 is difficult to understand: it should be better clarified in the text and in the legend

Author Response

Dear Reviewer, 

Thank you for your precious comments

We changed the title of the manuscript, as you considered and we corrected the figure 5 with the legend

We hope it is sufficient for you

Thank you once again for your time, we appreciate your remarks in improving our work

Kind regards, 

Dr Kirkova

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear authors.

If you consider the following, the manuscript becomes more valuable:

 

1. The title is inconsistent with the rest of the paper.

 

2. The abstract is vague and does not adhere to the journal style.

 

3. The results could be improved to make them more understandable to readers.

 

4. The conclusion is uninformative.with regards,

 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

I would want to thank you for your precious comments on our manuscript

We corrected the title and the abstract. We restructured the results to make them more understandable for readers. 

We revised the conclusions.

Thank you once again for your time, we appreciate your remarks in improving our work

Best regards,

Dr Kirkova

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear authors,

the manuscript still not consistent and needs rewriting.

with regards,