Next Article in Journal
Visual Suppression is Impaired in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 6 but Preserved in Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo
Next Article in Special Issue
Natriuretic Peptides in Kawasaki Disease: the Myocardial Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Improving Accuracy for Image Fusion in Abdominal Ultrasonography
Open AccessArticle

Importance of Attenuation Correction (AC) for Small Animal PET Imaging

Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Faculty of Health Sciences & Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, Copenhagen DK-2200, Denmark
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2012, 2(4), 42-51;
Received: 17 August 2012 / Revised: 13 September 2012 / Accepted: 8 October 2012 / Published: 9 October 2012
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers)
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a correction for annihilation photon attenuation in small objects such as mice is necessary. The attenuation recovery for specific organs and subcutaneous tumors was investigated. A comparison between different attenuation correction methods was performed. Methods: Ten NMRI nude mice with subcutaneous implantation of human breast cancer cells (MCF-7) were scanned consecutively in small animal PET and CT scanners (MicroPETTM Focus 120 and ImTek’s MicroCATTM II). CT-based AC, PET-based AC and uniform AC methods were compared. Results: The activity concentration in the same organ with and without AC revealed an overall attenuation recovery of 9–21% for MAP reconstructed images, i.e., SUV without AC could underestimate the true activity at this level. For subcutaneous tumors, the attenuation was 13 ± 4% (9–17%), for kidneys 20 ± 1% (19–21%), and for bladder 18 ± 3% (15–21%). The FBP reconstructed images showed almost the same attenuation levels as the MAP reconstructed images for all organs. Conclusions: The annihilation photons are suffering attenuation even in small subjects. Both PET-based and CT-based are adequate as AC methods. The amplitude of the AC recovery could be overestimated using the uniform map. Therefore, application of a global attenuation factor on PET data might not be accurate for attenuation correction. View Full-Text
Keywords: attenuation correction; small animal; PET imaging; MicroPET; molecular imaging attenuation correction; small animal; PET imaging; MicroPET; molecular imaging
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

El Ali, H.H.; Bodholdt, R.P.; Jørgensen, J.T.; Myschetzky, R.; Kjaer, A. Importance of Attenuation Correction (AC) for Small Animal PET Imaging. Diagnostics 2012, 2, 42-51.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop