Next Article in Journal
The Anatomy of the Stylohyoid Chain: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Analytical Validation of MyProstateScore 2.0
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

An Incidental Finding of Appendiceal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor with Abundant Skeinoid Fibers: A Rare Case Report with Insights from a Comprehensive Literature Review

Department of Pathology, LSUHSC School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2025, 15(7), 924; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15070924
Submission received: 17 February 2025 / Revised: 29 March 2025 / Accepted: 1 April 2025 / Published: 3 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics)

Abstract

:
Background and Clinical Significance: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract but are exceedingly rare in the appendix, with only 20 cases reported in the literature. Due to their rarity, clinical behavior, histopathologic features, and management of appendiceal GISTs remain poorly understood. Case Presentation: We present the case of a 74-year-old man who underwent a right hemicolectomy for colonic adenocarcinoma, during which an incidental 1.2 cm appendiceal GIST was discovered. Histopathological examination revealed spindle cell morphology with abundant skeinoid fibers (SF), minimal mitotic activity (<1/50 HPF), and no nuclear atypia. Immunohistochemical staining confirmed positivity for CD117, DOG1, and CD34. The tumor was classified as low risk based on its size and mitotic count, and the patient remained recurrence-free at a 4-month follow-up. Conclusions: Our case expands the limited literature on appendiceal GISTs by demonstrating their histopathological and immunohistochemical features, favorable prognostic outcomes, and potential for incidental detection during surgeries for unrelated conditions. However, additional studies are needed to further elucidate their molecular characteristics and overall clinical behavior.

1. Introduction

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract, typically arising in the stomach, small intestine, or rectum, with fewer cases reported in the esophagus, colon, omentum, and mesentery [1]. They originate from the interstitial cells of Cajal and are primarily driven by activating mutations in the KIT or PDGFRA genes, leading to uncontrolled cell proliferation via constitutive activation of tyrosine kinase signaling pathways. The introduction of imatinib mesylate, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting both KIT and PDGFRA receptors, has significantly improved outcomes in patients with advanced GISTs [2]. In contrast, GISTs originating from the appendix are exceedingly rare, with only 20 cases reported in the literature to date. Due to their rarity, their clinical behavior, histopathologic features, and management remain poorly understood. In this report, we describe a rare case of an incidental appendiceal GIST with abundant skeinoid fibers, discovered during surgery for colonic adenocarcinoma. We also provide a comprehensive review of the literature to further elucidate the clinicopathologic, molecular, and prognostic features of this uncommon entity.

2. Case Presentation

A 74-year-old African American man with a history of diabetes mellitus and hypertension underwent a routine screening colonoscopy, which revealed a colonic mass near the hepatic flexure. Biopsy findings confirmed at least high-grade dysplasia/intramucosal adenocarcinoma. An abdominal CT scan demonstrated a 3.7 cm mass in the hepatic flexure of the colon, with a normal appendix.
The patient subsequently underwent a right hemicolectomy. Gross examination revealed a red–tan, firm, polypoid mass measuring 3.7 × 1.8 × 1.6 cm in the colon at the hepatic flexure, with invasion into the muscularis propria and involvement of the pericolonic adipose tissue. The histopathological evaluation confirmed the diagnosis of moderately differentiated invasive adenocarcinoma (pT3N2a), with four out of twenty-nine lymph nodes positive for metastatic carcinoma.
Incidentally, serial sectioning of the appendix revealed a firm, white–tan area surrounding the pinpoint lumen in the proximal portion, measuring 1.2 × 1.1 × 0.9 cm. Histopathological examination of the appendiceal lesion identified spindle cells (Figure 1) with PAS-positive extracellular collagen globules (Figure 2, consistent with skeinoid fibers. No nuclear atypia or necrosis was observed, and mitotic activity was less than 1 per 50 high-power fields. Immunohistochemical analysis (Figure 3) demonstrated that the lesional cells were positive for CD117, DOG1, CD34, and vimentin, while negative for SMA, Desmin, and S100. These findings supported the diagnosis of a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) of the appendix, of spindle cell type with skeinoid fibers. There were no microscopic signs of appendicitis, and all margins of the appendix were negative for tumor involvement.
The patient remained alive and well at the 4-month follow-up.

3. Discussion and Literature Review

Appendiceal GISTs are extremely rare, accounting for only 0.1% of all GISTs in the dataset [1]. To date, only 20 cases originating from the appendix have been described in the literature (Table 1). The majority of appendiceal GISTs occur in older adults, with a mean age of 63.7 years (ranging from 6 to 86 years), including our case, although a single pediatric case has been reported in a 6-year-old boy [3]. There is a marked male predominance, with a male-to-female ratio of approximately 3:1. Our case contributes valuable evidence to the limited understanding of appendiceal GISTs and provides additional insight into this rare clinical entity.
Although 55% of patients initially present with symptoms mimicking acute appendicitis, in most reported cases the histopathologic examination does not confirm acute inflammation. Instead, 30% of appendiceal GISTs are instead detected incidentally during surgeries for unrelated pathologies. Approximately 30% of patients with appendiceal GIST have concurrent malignancies, such as bladder carcinoma, cervical cancer, pulmonary adenocarcinoma, endometrial carcinoma, or mantle cell lymphoma [4,5,6,7,8]. In our case, the appendiceal GIST coexisted with colonic adenocarcinoma and was discovered incidentally during grossing examination after surgery. However, due to the limited number of reported cases, the clinical significance of these associations remains unclear and warrants further investigation. One unique case [6] involved simultaneous appendiceal and gastric GISTs. The appendiceal GIST exhibited a spindle cell morphology with involvement of the muscular wall, whereas the gastric GIST displayed an epithelioid phenotype and subsequently metastasized to the liver. These distinct histological differences strongly suggested that the two GISTs were entirely independent tumors. Another case [8] described an appendiceal GIST coexisting with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2). In contrast, neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is more frequently associated with GIST; however, appendiceal involvement has not been discovered. A study by Miettinen and Fetsch et al. [9], which analyzed 45 patients with NF1-associated GISTs, found that the majority of tumors arose in the jejunum, ileum, or duodenum, with 28 patients presenting with multiple GISTs. None of these cases involved the appendix. No clear relationship has been established between NF2 and appendiceal GIST. Given that only one instance of appendiceal GIST coexisting with NF2 has been identified among the 20 reported cases, this co-occurrence is likely coincidental.
With respect to anatomical distribution, appendiceal GISTs can arise anywhere along the appendix, including the tip (5/20), the proximal portion (6/20), the mid-portion (4/20), or the mesoappendix (1/20). Their sizes range from very small lesions (<1 cm) to tumors exceeding 10 cm in their greatest dimension. Histologically, most appendiceal GISTs exhibit a spindle cell pattern, with occasional epithelioid components (2/20). Of the twenty reported cases, only five specifically mention the presence of skeinoid fibers [4,6,10]. Our case also demonstrates a substantial presence of skeinoid fibers. All six appendiceal GISTs with skeinoid fibers (6/21), including our case, were classified as low risk or very low risk according to modified NIH risk classification [11]. The average patient age was 65.3 years (range: 56–78 years), with a male predominance (M:F ratio of 5:1). Four cases were located in the proximal portion of the appendix, one at the tip, and one case had an unspecified location. A comprehensive study by Miettinen and Makhlouf et al. [12], which analyzed 906 small intestinal GISTs, identified skeinoid fibers in 44% of cases. Their presence was linked to a more favorable clinical course, suggesting that these fibers might serve as a beneficial prognostic marker. However, further research is needed to confirm this potential correlation and clarify its clinical significance in appendiceal GISTs.
Consistent with classic GIST phenotypes, nearly all appendiceal GISTs are immunoreactive for CD117 (c-KIT) and/or DOG1, with frequent co-expression of CD34. Muscle and neural markers (SMA, Desmin, S-100) are typically negative, although focal S-100 positivity has been noted in two cases [7,8]. This distinct immunohistochemical profile allows for confident differentiation of GISTs from more common appendiceal tumors, such as neuroendocrine tumors, leiomyomas, schwannomas, and mucinous epithelial neoplasms. Among the 20 reported cases of appendiceal GISTs, mutation analysis has been performed in only five [4,5,7,13]. In the present case, gene mutation testing was not performed. Of the five analyzed cases, three tumors revealed heterozygous KIT exon 11 mutations in the juxtamembrane region: Case 1 exhibited a missense mutation (K558R), Case 2 harbored an in-frame deletion (I571_R588), and Case 3 had a deletion/inversion mutation (K588_V559). The remaining two tumors were wild-type for KIT. However, non-appendiceal gastrointestinal GISTs are typically sporadic and exhibit a broader mutation spectrum, including alterations in KIT (exons 2, 9, 11, 13, 14, and 17) and PDGFRA (exons 12 and 14), as well as less common mutations involving SDH, NF1, BRAF, and KRAS [2,5,14,15]. In contrast, pediatric GISTs arising outside the appendix more frequently occur in syndromic or familial contexts, such as Carney–Stratakis syndrome or Carney’s triad, and are often associated with deficiencies in the succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) complex. KIT or PDGFRA mutations are identified in only about 15% of pediatric and young adult cases [16,17]. However, no familial syndrome or genetic mutation has been identified in the single reported pediatric case of appendiceal GIST. This likely reflects the limited number of appendiceal GISTs both in adults and children that have been studied at the molecular level.
Risk stratification of appendiceal GISTs generally follows the same principles applied to small bowel GISTs, where size and mitotic rate are the primary determinants of malignant potential. Smaller tumors (<2 cm) with low mitotic activity (<5 mitoses per 50 HPF) typically fall into the low- or very-low-risk categories and generally respond well to local resection alone. In contrast, larger tumors (≥5 cm) and/or those with high mitotic counts tend to exhibit more aggressive behavior. Among the twenty reported cases, three presented with malignant features: one involving a six-year-old patient with increased mitosis (12/50 HPF) [3], another with peritoneal metastasis [18], and a third case of appendiceal GIST invading locally and perforating adjacent bowel [19]. In these cases, neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as imatinib effectively reduced tumor burden and prevented recurrence.
Table 1. Clinicopathologic and molecular features of reported appendiceal GISTs.
Table 1. Clinicopathologic and molecular features of reported appendiceal GISTs.
Case No.ReferenceAgeGenderSymptomsLocationSize (cm)HistologyRisk ClassificationCoexisting MalignancyGenotypeOutcome
1Markku Miettinen et al., 2001 [6]64MIncidental
(autopsy)
Tip1.4Spindle cell:
SF+
Low riskMetastatic pulmonary adenocarcinoma N/ADied (unrelated)
2Markku Miettinen et al., 2001 [6]56MAppendicitis-like Proximal1.2Spindle cell;
SF+
Low riskNoneN/AAlive at 8 Y
3Markku Miettinen et al., 2001 [6]59MIncidental N/A0.9Spindle cell;
SF+
Low riskGastric epithelioid GIST N/ADied at 15 Y (liver metastasis from gastric GIST)
4Markku Miettinen et al., 2001 [6]72MAppendicitisProximal1.3Spindle cellN/ANoneN/ADied at 4 Y
(COPD)
5W. M. Yap et al., 2005 [8]66FAppendicitis-like Mid portion0.25Spindle cell Low riskNF2N/AN/A
6Kyu-Jong Kim et al., 2007 [20]56MGI bleedingMid portion<1 Spindle cell Low riskNoneN/ANo recurrence at 3 M
7A. Agaimy et al., 2008 [4]72MIncidental Tip2.5Spindle cell; focal epithelioidLow riskUrinary bladder carcinomaKIT inframe deletion I571_R588 (Exon 11)No recurrence at 4 M
8A. Agaimy et al., 2008 [4]78FAppendicitis-like Proximal0.5Spindle cell;
SF+
Very low riskEndometrial adenocarcinomaKIT K558R (Exon11)N/A
9A. Agaimy et al., 2008 [5]86FN/AN/A<1Spindle cellVery low riskNoneWild typeN/A
10Kurosh Rahimi et al., 2009 [7]65FIncidental N/A1.1Epithelioid and spindle cell; nerve differentiationVery low riskMantle cell lymphoma with appendiceal involvementWild typeNo recurrence at 24 M
11Ram Elazary et al. [19]57MAbdominal pain and peri-appendiceal abscessTip 20Spindle cells Malignant (invading adjacent bowel)NoneN/AN/A
12Wenhua Li et al., 2012 [3]6MAbdominal pain and hard massMesoappendix6.7Spindle and epithelioid cell MalignantNoneN/ANo recurrence at 9 M
13M. Bouassida et al., 2013 [21]75MAppendicitis, perforation, and acute peritonitisMid portion2.0Spindle cellLow riskNoneN/ANo recurrence at 48 M
14Nikolaos Vassos et al., 2013 [13]48MAppendicitis-like N/A3.0Spindle cellHigh risk (tumor rupture)NoneKIT 558-559del and 559-560ins (Exon11)No recurrence at 27 M
15J. M. Chun and K. H. Lim, 2016 [22]68MAppendicitisProximal3.0Spindle cell Low riskNoneN/ANo recurrence at 35 M
16M. Kaneko et al., 2017 [18]67MLarge abdominal mass Tip22.0Spindle cellMalignant
(peritoneal metastasis)
NoneN/ANo recurrence at 6 M
17Bao Zhang et al., 2018 [23]59FIncidental N/A10N/AHigh riskCervical cancerN/AN/A
18N. Mourra et al., 2020 [10]61MAppendicitis-like symptomsProximal1.0Spindle cell;
SF+
Very low riskNoneN/AN/A
19Ahmad Elnassasra et al., 2022 [24] 75MAppendicitisTip<1 Spindle cell Low riskNoneN/AN/A
20Jacob D. Williams et al., 2024 [25]74MAbdominal pain; appendiceal massMid portion1.5Spindle cellLow riskNoneN/ANo recurrence at 2 M
Our case74MIncidentalProximal1.2Spindle cell;
SF+
Very low riskColonic adenocarcinomaN/ANo recurrence at 4 M

4. Conclusions

Appendiceal GISTs are exceptionally rare gastrointestinal stromal tumors, with 30% of cases being detected incidentally. Skeinoid fibers have been identified in only six cases to date and may serve as a favorable prognostic marker for these tumors, similar to small bowel GISTs. Although molecular studies have identified KIT exon 11 mutations in appendiceal GISTs, further research is needed to elucidate their broader genetic landscape and biological behavior.

Author Contributions

Y.L. drafted the manuscript. A.F. and Y.C. collected clinical data. Z.F. revised the manuscript and is the author guarantor. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This case report is exempt from Institutional Review Board approval.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Miettinen, M.; Lasota, J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Pathology and prognosis at different sites. Semin. Diagn. Pathol. 2006, 23, 70–83. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Kalfusova, A.; Linke, Z.; Kalinova, M.; Krskova, L.; Hilska, I.; Szabova, J.; Vicha, A.; Kodet, R. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors—Summary of mutational status of the primary/secondary KIT/PDGFRA mutations, BRAF mutations and SDH defects. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2019, 215, 152708. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Li, W.; Cui, Y.; Ren, G.; Wang, J.; Wu, X. Extragastrointestinal stromal tumor of the mesoappendix: CT findings and a review of the literature. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2012, 10, 211. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Agaimy, A.; Pelz, A.F.; Wieacker, P.; Roessner, A.; Wunsch, P.H.; Schneider-Stock, R. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the vermiform appendix: Clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular study of 2 cases with literature review. Hum. Pathol. 2008, 39, 1252–1257. [Google Scholar]
  5. Agaimy, A.; Wunsch, P.H.; Dirnhofer, S.; Bihl, M.P.; Terracciano, L.M.; Tornillo, L. Microscopic gastrointestinal stromal tumors in esophageal and intestinal surgical resection specimens: A clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular study of 19 lesions. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2008, 32, 867–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Miettinen, M.; Sobin, L.H. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the appendix: A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of four cases. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2001, 25, 1433–1437. [Google Scholar]
  7. Rahimi, K.; Gologan, A.; Haliotis, T.; Lamoureux, E.; Chetty, R. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor with autonomic nerve differentiation and coexistent mantle cell lymphoma involving the appendix. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2009, 2, 608–613. [Google Scholar]
  8. Yap, W.M.; Tan, H.W.; Goh, S.G.; Chuah, K.L. Appendiceal gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2005, 29, 1545–1547. [Google Scholar]
  9. Miettinen, M.; Fetsch, J.F.; Sobin, L.H.; Lasota, J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors in patients with neurofibromatosis 1: A clinicopathologic and molecular genetic study of 45 cases. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2006, 30, 90–96. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mourra, N.; Matalka, I.; Arrive, L. Incidental Finding of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor in the Appendix. Appl. Immunohistochem. Mol. Morphol. 2020, 28, e31–e32. [Google Scholar]
  11. Joensuu, H. Risk stratification of patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Hum. Pathol. 2008, 39, 1411–1419. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Miettinen, M.; Makhlouf, H.; Sobin, L.H.; Lasota, J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the jejunum and ileum: A clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 906 cases before imatinib with long-term follow-up. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2006, 30, 477–489. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Vassos, N.; Agaimy, A.; Gunther, K.; Hohenberger, W.; Schneider-Stock, R.; Croner, R.S. A novel complex KIT mutation in a gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the vermiform appendix. Hum. Pathol. 2013, 44, 651–655. [Google Scholar]
  14. Comandone, A.; Boglione, A. The importance of mutational status in prognosis and therapy of GIST. Recenti Prog. Med. 2015, 106, 17–22. [Google Scholar]
  15. Astolfi, A.; Indio, V.; Nannini, M.; Saponara, M.; Schipani, A.; De Leo, A.; Altimari, A.; Vincenzi, B.; Comandini, D.; Grignani, G.; et al. Targeted Deep Sequencing Uncovers Cryptic KITMutations in KIT/PDGFRA/SDH/RAS-PWild-Type GIST. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 504. [Google Scholar]
  16. Benesch, M.; Wardelmann, E.; Ferrari, A.; Brennan, B.; Verschuur, A. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) in children and adolescents: A comprehensive review of the current literature. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2009, 53, 1171–1179. [Google Scholar]
  17. Min, V.; Corradini, N.; Macagno, N.; Orbach, D.; Reguerre, Y.; Petit, P.; Blay, J.-Y.; Verschuur, A. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) in children: An update of this orphan disease. Bull. Cancer 2025, 112, 348–357. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kaneko, M.; Kawai, K.; Murono, K.; Nishikawa, T.; Sasaki, K.; Otani, K.; Yasuda, K.; Tanaka, T.; Kiyomatsu, T.; Hata, K.; et al. Giant gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the vermiform appendix: A case report. Mol. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 7, 399–403. [Google Scholar]
  19. Elazary, R.; Schlager, A.; Khalaileh, A.; Appelbaum, L.; Bala, M.; Abu-Gazala, M.; Khatib, A.; Neuman, T.; Rivkind, A.I.; Almogy, G. Malignant appendiceal GIST: Case report and review of the literature. J. Gastrointest. Cancer 2010, 41, 9–12. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kim, K.J.; Moon, W.; Park, M.I.; Park, S.J.; Lee, S.H.; Chun, B.K. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor of appendix incidentally diagnosed by appendiceal hemorrhage. World J. Gastroenterol. 2007, 13, 3265–3267. [Google Scholar]
  21. Bouassida, M.; Chtourou, M.F.; Chalbi, E.; Chebbi, F.; Hamzaoui, L.; Sassi, S.; Charifi, L.; Mighri, M.M.; Touinsi, H.; Sassi, A. Appendiceal GIST: Report of an exceptional case and review of the literature. Pan Afr. Med. J. 2013, 15, 85. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Chun, J.M.; Lim, K.H. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the vermiform appendix mimicking Meckel’s diverticulum: Case report with literature review. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2016, 21, 20–22. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Zhang, B.; Zheng, G.L.; Zhu, H.T.; Zhao, Y.; Zheng, Z.C. Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of primary appendiceal stromal tumors. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2018, 16, 225. [Google Scholar]
  24. Elnassasra, A.; Hershkovitz, Y.; Zager, Y.; Lavy, R. Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor of the Appendix. Isr. Med. Assoc. J. 2022, 24, 677–678. [Google Scholar]
  25. Williams, J.D.; Kong, C.Y.; Schmigylski, R.; Nale, K.; Mirza, M. Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumour of the Appendix: A Very Rare Entity. Cureus 2024, 16, e59780. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (A) Low-power view reveals a cellular nodule within the muscularis propria layer of the appendix (H&E, 20×). (B) High-power view shows the appendiceal GIST as a spindle cell tumor infiltrating between the smooth muscle fibers, without nuclear atypia or mitosis (H&E, 200×).
Figure 1. (A) Low-power view reveals a cellular nodule within the muscularis propria layer of the appendix (H&E, 20×). (B) High-power view shows the appendiceal GIST as a spindle cell tumor infiltrating between the smooth muscle fibers, without nuclear atypia or mitosis (H&E, 200×).
Diagnostics 15 00924 g001
Figure 2. (A) H&E staining at 400× magnification reveals abundant extracellular collagen globules (skeinoid fibers) in the appendiceal GIST. (B) Periodic acid–Schiff (PAS) staining demonstrates scattered PAS-positive collagen globules, consistent with skeinoid fibers.
Figure 2. (A) H&E staining at 400× magnification reveals abundant extracellular collagen globules (skeinoid fibers) in the appendiceal GIST. (B) Periodic acid–Schiff (PAS) staining demonstrates scattered PAS-positive collagen globules, consistent with skeinoid fibers.
Diagnostics 15 00924 g002
Figure 3. Immunohistochemical staining at 200× magnification demonstrates strong positivity of tumor cells for DOG1 (A), CD117 (B), CD34 (C), and Vimentin (D).
Figure 3. Immunohistochemical staining at 200× magnification demonstrates strong positivity of tumor cells for DOG1 (A), CD117 (B), CD34 (C), and Vimentin (D).
Diagnostics 15 00924 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Feroze, A.; Fu, Z. An Incidental Finding of Appendiceal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor with Abundant Skeinoid Fibers: A Rare Case Report with Insights from a Comprehensive Literature Review. Diagnostics 2025, 15, 924. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15070924

AMA Style

Liu Y, Chen Y, Feroze A, Fu Z. An Incidental Finding of Appendiceal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor with Abundant Skeinoid Fibers: A Rare Case Report with Insights from a Comprehensive Literature Review. Diagnostics. 2025; 15(7):924. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15070924

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Yu, Yaomin Chen, Asra Feroze, and Zhiyan Fu. 2025. "An Incidental Finding of Appendiceal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor with Abundant Skeinoid Fibers: A Rare Case Report with Insights from a Comprehensive Literature Review" Diagnostics 15, no. 7: 924. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15070924

APA Style

Liu, Y., Chen, Y., Feroze, A., & Fu, Z. (2025). An Incidental Finding of Appendiceal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor with Abundant Skeinoid Fibers: A Rare Case Report with Insights from a Comprehensive Literature Review. Diagnostics, 15(7), 924. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15070924

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop