Next Article in Journal
Lesion Detection and Analysis Using Optical Imaging
Next Article in Special Issue
Perfusion Status in Lacunar Stroke: A Pathophysiological Issue
Previous Article in Journal
Computational Intelligence in Cancer Diagnostics: A Contemporary Review of Smart Phone Apps, Current Problems, and Future Research Potentials
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 13
Issue 9
10.3390/diagnostics13091564
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

CT Perfusion in Lacunar Stroke: A Systematic Review

by
Marialuisa Zedde
1,*,
Manuela Napoli
2,
Ilaria Grisendi
1,
Federica Assenza
1,
Claudio Moratti
2,
Franco Valzania
1 and
Rosario Pascarella
2
1
Neurology Unit, Stroke Unit, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, via Amendola 2, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy
2
Neuroradiology Unit, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, via Amendola 2, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2023, 13(9), 1564; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13091564
Submission received: 18 March 2023 / Revised: 7 April 2023 / Accepted: 25 April 2023 / Published: 27 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Imaging in Acute Stroke)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background. The main theory underlying the use of perfusion imaging in acute ischemic stroke is the presence of a hypoperfused volume of the brain downstream of an occluded artery. Indeed, the main purpose of perfusion imaging is to select patients for endovascular treatment. Computed Tomography Perfusion (CTP) is the more used technique because of its wide availability but lacunar infarcts are theoretically outside the purpose of CTP, and limited data are available about CTP performance in acute stroke patients with lacunar stroke. Methods. We performed a systematic review searching in PubMed and EMBASE for CTP and lacunar stroke with a final selection of 14 papers, which were examined for data extraction and, in particular, CTP technical issues and sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV values. Results. A global cohort of 583 patients with lacunar stroke was identified, with a mean age ranging from 59.8 to 72 years and a female percentage ranging from 32 to 53.1%.CTP was performed with different technologies (16 to 320 rows), different post-processing software, and different maps. Sensitivity ranges from 0 to 62.5%, and specificity from 20 to 100%. Conclusions. CTP does not allow to reasonable exclude lacunar infarct if no perfusion deficit is found, but the pathophysiology of lacunar infarct is more complex than previously thought.

1. Introduction

Advanced neuroimaging has been increasingly used in the last years for selecting acute stroke patients for revascularization treatment. Both Computed Tomography (CT)- based and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-based protocols have been validated for this purpose and practically applied as suggested by the guidelines, but multimodal CT is becoming the preferred imaging assessment for acute stroke patients [1,2]. Regardless of technique, the two main aims of advanced neuroimaging are the identifications of large vessel occlusion (LVO) or distal vessel occlusion (DVO) amenable for endovascular treatment and the assessment of tissue viability in the corresponding territory, particularly in the late time window. In particular, in the time window between 4.5 and 9 h. the identification of a core/penumbra mismatch is a mandatory requirement to administer rtPA, independently from the demonstration of vessel occlusion. Indeed, the perfusion thresholds were assessed with an automated processing software and mediated from the clinical trials and their meta-analysis [3] (i.e., an infarct core volume < 70 mL and a critically hypoperfused volume/infarct core volume > 1.2 with mismatch volume > 10 mL) allowed rtPA administration in patients for whom mechanical thrombectomy is either not indicated or not planned [4]. Moreover, in patients with unknown time onset of symptoms and wake-up stroke, who have CT or MRI core/perfusion mismatch within 9 h from the midpoint of sleep, and for whom mechanical thrombectomy is either not indicated or not planned, rtPA administration is recommended with a definition of mismatch threshold as previously detailed [5].
The premise of perfusion imaging in acute stroke is the presence of territorial ischemia due to LVO or DVO. Lacunar stroke, expression mainly of small vessel disease or atherothrombotic involvement of the parent artery occluding a perforating branch, is outside this purpose, so there is only scarce information on the use of perfusion techniques in the hyperacute phase for the identification of a mismatch in the territory of a perforating artery. Perfusion changes sized as lacunar infarcts are not visible on the post-processed core-penumbra maps because they are typically smoothed on automated software, including in the map only relatively large clusters of hypoperfused pixels. A few small studies [6,7,8] suggested that visual assessment of the mean transit time (MTT) map on CTP had reasonable sensitivity to detect lacunar infarction. Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) MRI has excellent sensitivity for lacunar stroke, but, unfortunately, it is not largely accessible in the management of hyperacute stroke. CTP has advantages in accessibility, but a couple of studies [9,10] found 50% of false negative cases could be attributed to lacunar stroke.
The aim of this systematic review is to define, according to the available data, the diagnostic yield of CTP in lacunar ischemic stroke in the hyperacute phase.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sources

This systematic review follows the Meta-Analyses and Systematic Reviews of Observational Studies (MOOSE) group guidelines [11].
We searched PubMed and EMBASE databases for studies addressing CTP findings in patients with acute lacunar stroke published from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2022. We used the following keywords respectively for PubMed and EMBASE: CTP OR “CT perfusion” AND (lacunar OR lacuna OR lacunar infarct*); (‘ct perfusion’/exp OR ‘ct perfusion’ OR ((‘ct’/exp OR ct) AND (‘perfusion’/exp OR perfusion))) AND (‘lacunar stroke’/exp OR ‘lacunar stroke’). In addition, we applied forward and backward citation tracking to improve the results.

2.2. Eligibility Criteria

All studies presenting original data that reported CTP performance in lacunar stroke identification were included. We limited the selection to English-language studies and excluded case reports and studies on nonhuman subjects. We also excluded studies evaluating CTP in acute stroke without explicitly including lacunar stroke and, in particular, studies on LVO and DVO. Abstracts presented at relevant scientific meetings were excluded because of the lack of relevant information. We avoided including duplicated datasets.
We relied on the definition and diagnostics provided in the original study for lacunar infarct definition and CTP maps and parameters descriptions and for automatic post-processing analysis. No limitation was predefined according to the number of rows of CT scanners.
Two investigators (MZ, RP) independently screened the papers retrieved in the literature search and performed them accordingly to the previously detailed criteria.

2.3. Data Extraction

The NIH Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies [12] was used to evaluate each eligible publication. The following information was extracted: authors, year publication, country, study design, population features, CTP technical details, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) in comparison with follow-up neuroimaging findings.
In case of missing values, we tried to derive them whenever it is possible [12]. Disagreements between the two reviewers were addressed and resolved by consensus.

3. Results

We identified 99 papers, and after the screening, we selected 14 publications (see PRISMA table in Figure 1).
According to the NIH Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional, all studies achieved a fair level of quality.
The selected studies cover a wide temporal range in enrolling patients from 2004 [9] to 2021 [13], and the main features of inclusion criteria and lacunar stroke definition were summarized in Table 1. Several countries on multiple continents are represented with missing studies/data for African and South American people. All studies were retrospective case series from comprehensive stroke centers.
Most studies made explicit the definition of lacunar infarction based on neuroimaging (mainly DWI-MRI at the follow-up), but a minority of papers did not provide this information. Only a few studies referred to standardized neuroimaging reporting for SVD stroke [7].
The demographic features of the enrolled patients and the neuroimaging technical details and findings, as extracted from the selected papers, are summarized in Table 2.
The selected papers provided data on a global sample of 583 patients with lacunar stroke (two papers did not specify the number of lacunar strokes within the study population). The mean age ranges from 59.8 [6] to 72 years [16], with a women percentage ranging from 32 [14] to 53.1% [6], but with the half of studies (7) not reporting the information. In three studies [9,14,17], CTP was performed with a 16 rows scanner; in one study [17], a 40 rows scanner was used; in five studies [6,9,15,16,18], a 128 rows scanner was declared; in two studies [15,21], a 320 rows scanner was used allowing a whole brain perfusion approach and in one study [20] no technical detail was provided. A great variety of post-processing software was reported, ranging from vendor machines tools [9,16,17,18,19,23,24,25] to commercially available tools not related to individual vendor machines, such as Vitrea [21,21], RAPID [14], MIStar [15,23], F-STROKE [13]. However, most studies relied on visual assessment of the CTP maps and not on the automatic identification of hypoperfused areas. A consistent variability was reported in the perfusion maps examined in the individual studies, as depicted in Table 3. Table 3 also reported the vertical coverage of CTP package acquisition as indicated in the individual studies, and Table 4 the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV values in the selected studies.

4. Discussion

The core-penumbra hypothesis has been well documented in acute ischemic stroke due to LVO and DVO, and it is the conceptual framework of perfusion imaging and reperfusion treatment. In lacunar stroke, where the presumed occluded vessel is a single small perforating artery, this hypothesis is still a matter of debate. Looking for RSSI by using CTP is based on the hypothesis that stroke due to small vessel occlusion has a perfusion deficit as stroke due to LVO and DVO. Addressing the role of CTP in RSSI diagnosis is the main aim of our systematic review, and the results are really heterogeneous among the studies. Several sources of variability can be identified, and they substantially belong to two categories: technical or methodological issues about CTP and the pathophysiological heterogeneity of RSSI. In particular, this last point has not been systematically considered, and it may potentially affect the CTP performance. The relevance of RSSI pathophysiology in interpreting the CTP results makes it the first issue to consider.
About the first issue, the presumed evolution of RSSIs into lacunes has led to the term lacunar infarction based on careful histopathologic examinations, but neuroimaging follow-up [28] provided the information that RSSIs do not always evolve into lacunes but can remain as mainly non-cavitated-white matter hyperintensities (WMH) or even disappear after several weeks or months. The underlying pathophysiology tells us something about the possible differences in tissue vulnerability and repair, and the eventual relation with perfusion status at baseline is still unknown.
Regarding the second issue, i.e., technical issues at CTP, we are proposing some considerations. The sensitivity of CTP varies considerably due to the heterogeneity in patient characteristics, CTP spatial and temporal resolution, and post-processing methods [29], being higher in atherothrombotic stroke [18]. TTP or Tmax maps are highly sensitive to LVO and collateral blood flow [23]. Some studies about detecting acute lacunar infarcts with CTP found a sensitivity of 48.7–56% and a specificity of 98.7–100% [6,9,14]. Nevertheless, CTP maps are not good enough to evaluate lacunar infarcts due to their lower resolution and may result in false-negative results [29]. CBF and CBV abnormalities were more frequent among patients with Branch Artery Disease (BAD) than in lacunar infarct patients [24], probably because of the larger size of BAD, usually involving more than one perforating artery [30].
Sensitivity and specificity data for CTP diagnosis of lacunar stroke, as shown in Table 3, are available from seven studies and four of them provided detailed information. All the available studies were retrospective, and this limitation may affect global findings. There are several other sources of heterogeneity: the definition of lacunar stroke, the site and size of lacunar infarction (or RSSI), the year of patients’ enrollment, the rate of rtPA administration, the DWI-MRI diagnosis and timing of MRI in follow-up, and finally the scanner’s technology (scanner, volume coverage, post-processing software, and visual assessment, perfusion maps).
The definition of lacunar stroke used in the selected studies ranged from the partially overlapping concept of RSSI to the more complicated diameter-based definition (higher threshold of 15 mm [23] to 25 mm [14]) to the combination of clinical lacunar syndromes, hyperintensity on DWI-MRI in a penetrating vessel territory and no visible vessel occlusion in that region [15]. The site of a lacunar stroke may affect the global accuracy of the CTP study (e.g., lesions outside the coverage volume of CTP, including infratentorial strokes). Some studies limited the evaluation to supratentorial strokes [13], but other studies considered infratentorial strokes, too [17,21]. The detection of infratentorial infarctions can be improved by assessing whole-brain CTP, but it remains a diagnostic challenge, and especially small volume infarctions in the brainstem are likely to be missed [25], being the sensitivity very low [28.1% (95% CI: 12.9; 53.4)]. Globally, the sensitivity for infratentorial infarction <19 mm is 22.9% [95% CI: 9.9; 45.0], even for whole brain CTP [25]. In Zhu [13], 11/29 (37.9%) lacunar strokes were infratentorial; in Eckert 2011 [17], 4/54 of false negative CTP had infratentorial infarction. In Garcia-Esperon [15], most of the lacunar syndromes had a supratentorial infarct on DWI MRI (92 patients, 86.8%), 59 (55.6% of the total) had an isolated subcortical lesion, and 33 (31.1%) had a lesion with cortical involvement. In Tan [8], 31 (17%) patients had infarcts located in the lentiform nucleus 9 (29%), corona radiata 9 (29%), posterior limb of the internal capsule 6 (19%), thalamus 5 (16%), corpus callosum 1 (3%), and brainstem 1 (3%); 55% of subjects had lacunar mechanism. In Das [16], the distribution of LI was lenticulostriate 34 (57.6%), thalamus/posterior internal capsule 11 (18.6%); and pons 14 (23.7%). Perfusion abnormality was seen in 36/59 (61%) LI. In Cao [14], 32 patients had MRI-confirmed lacunar stroke within CTP coverage (18 in the striatum, 10 in the thalamus, 4 in corona radiata).
The location of RSSI (internal/external capsule/lentiform nucleus vs centrum semiovale vs thalamus) may affect the sensitivity of CTP in identifying them also in the supratentorial areas and within the coverage area of the CTP slab. Valdés Hernández et al. [31] reported the volumes of RSSI in various locations in the acute phase: internal capsule/lentiform nucleus 1.23 mL [0.99–1.77], centrum semiovale 1.32 mL [1.05–1.86], thalamus 0.51 mL [0.32–0.81], brainstem 0.72 mL [0.56–0.98], optical radiation 1.60 mL [1.51–1.69]. It is possible that thalamic lesions may often be under the resolution of CTP because of the relatively low volume in comparison with other locations. Another issue is the relation between RSSI location and the rate of identified perfusion abnormalities. In an MRI study [32] the infarction localization is significantly associated with the frequency of a perfusion deficit: 10/13 (76.9%) in the basal ganglia, 15/27 (55.6%) in the internal capsule, 20/27 (74.1%) in the thalamus, 11/34 (32.4%) in the corona radiata, and 3/10 (30.0%) in the brainstem (p = 0.003).
RSSI, as currently defined, does not have a lower-size boundary. Therefore, this label may also include very small, punctate DWI hyperintense lesions in the subcortical white matter. In Tao et a. [33], a consecutive retrospective cohort of patients with DWI-diagnosed RSSI was separated into acute subcortical microinfarctions (diameter < 5 mm) versus the larger RSSI (diameter 5–20 mm). They found that 23/584 (3.9%) of ischemic lesions were in the first group and located in the basal ganglia (11/23), followed by the thalamus (5/23) and centrum semiovale (4/23).
The year of stroke ranged from 2004 [9] to 2021 [13], and this issue may directly affect the CTP technology (scanner and post-processing software), but this issue cannot be more deeply addressed because of the general heterogeneity of the technical equipment in individual studies.
Not all studies reported the rate of rtPA administration in the described cohort and the rate of “negative” DWI in patients receiving rtPA, but it is possible that this issue should be taken into account, in particular in old studies with late MRI assessment from the symptom’s onset and patients with long-lasting neurological deficit. Moreover, it is coherent with the previously detailed size issue [33]. Akhtar et al. [20] reported the administration of rtPA among RSSI patients as follows: 213 did not receive rtPA, and 45 received it. In Eckert [17], 84 patients were included <3 h and 23 >3 h; rtPA was administered in 51 patients, 30 ≤ 3 h and 11 > 3 h. Interestingly, Rudilosso [23] reported false negatives in 37.5% of treated patients vs 18.8% of not treated patients. In Zhu [13], 4 (13.8%) lacunar infarcts received rtPA before MRI. Old studies reported the disappearance of MRI perfusion and diffusion abnormalities in lacunar infarctions after thrombolysis [34].
The high sensitivity of DWI-MRI allows to detect very small infarcts (1–2 mm in diameter) [35], but the blooming effects may lead to an overestimation of the maximum diameter of acute DWI in comparison with the true infarct size [36]. Even patients with a transient neurological deficit (TIA) demonstrate DWI lesions at a rate of 1 in 6 to 2 in 3. Symptom duration, speech or motor symptoms, and etiology seem to correlate with the rate of DWI positivity [37]. However, the odds for detectable lesions on DWI seem to decline in the subacute stage with advancing latency between symptom onset and MR imaging [38]. Interestingly, the ADC decrease in the ischemic lesion (if present) was less pronounced in patients with complete recovery in less than 24 h compared to patients with completed strokes [22,39,40,41]. It is virtually unknown if rtPA administration in patients with long-lasting deficits may affect the DWI-ADC appearance of the lesion. In stroke patients, the DWI detection rate of ischemic lesions is >95% [26,27,42,43,44]. Nevertheless, there are reports on DWI-negative strokes [45,46] illustrating that the diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke cannot be excluded solely on the base of DWI without visible lesions.
In CTP studies, the timing of MRI in follow-up ranged from 2 [7,14,16] to 15 days [8]. This issue may have a great impact on the diagnosis of lacunar stroke if defined by DWI-MRI hyperintensity. In a retrospective analysis, [47] of acute stroke patients divided in DWI positive and DWI negative on MRI performed within 72 h from hospital admission, 15/33 (45.4%) of negative DWI patients had a lacunar syndrome according to Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project Classification (OCSPC) and 20/33 (60.6%) an SVD mechanism. It is possible to propose the hypothesis that using a different MRI technology with a lower sensitivity and extending the timing of scanning from admission can affect the diagnostic accuracy based on the follow-up comparator. The lack of DWI hyperintensity in the initial MRI of acute stroke was reported in 9.5% at 3T [47], 5.8% [45], and 25.6% [48] at lower field strengths. Considering that the clinical symptoms and signs poorly discriminate the size of subcortical infarcts and even the smallest lesions could cause overt neurological symptoms [33], it is likely that some of the DWI-negative stroke patients with long-lasting deficit may be included in this group in particular, if the MRI scanning time was not early.
The selected studies, as reported in Table 2 and Table 3, had a marked heterogeneity in several technical issues about the scanner, and each of them may affect the sensitivity and specificity of the findings. For example, the rows number ranges from 16 [14] to 320 [21], suggesting a completely different reliability of the findings in small subcortical infarctions, the latter a whole brain perfusion technique, covering from the infratentorial region to the vertex and including the entire subcortical white matter. The rows number has a direct impact on volume coverage with a single slab (see Table 3), ranging from 2.8 cm with 64 rows, 10 cm with 128 rows, and up to the entire brain with 256 and 320 rows.
The different technology (16 rows scanner) may have affected the finding from Lin [9] that small hyperacute infarcts, many of the lacunar types, were poorly discernible on CTP, which detected only 2 (15.4%) of the 13 that were within its coverage volume. Eckert [17], using a 40 rows scanner, reported that follow-up MRI detected brain infarcts in 23/54 patients with normal CTP, the majority being lacunar infarcts (16) within the CTP perfusion coverage. Hana [18], with a 64 rows scanner, reported a sensitivity of 0% for lacunar infarction. Campbell [25], with a 16 rows scanner, reported that the main reason for non-diagnostic CTP was lacunar infarction (28 pts—10%), followed by infarct outside slab coverage (21 pts—8%), technical failure (4 pts—1%) and reperfusion (2 pts—0.7%).
In Hana (64 rows scanner) [18], the toggling table CT technique was used to extend the volume coverage of the brain [49]. This technique was found to be useful as an initial imaging method in acute ischemic stroke in order to extend the volume coverage, although it had low sensitivity for detecting small acute infarctions. In particular, this technique provided higher lesion detection than 20-mm-coverage perfusion CT [50]. As a confirmation of these pitfalls, a 0% sensitivity was reported for lacunar infarction by the authors. The same consideration also applies to the shuttle mode used by Tan [8] for the same purpose, i.e., to extend the volume coverage of CTP [51], reducing the temporal resolution [28].
Another source of variability is the use of different (commercially available and vendor machines) software for post-processing CTP source images and generating perfusion maps. The majority of studies declared that visual inspection of the maps was used instead of the automatic output of the software, finding a higher sensitivity: 42% vs. 6% in Garcia-Esperon [15]. In general, the main problem is the relatively low sensitivity and specificity of CTP for lacunar strokes/RSSI; indeed, no false positive perfusion images were rated [14,17,18]. Table 3 summarizes the different perfusion maps assessed in the available studies, and Table 4 are reported the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV values provided by the individual studies. In Cao [14] MTT map showed 56% sensitivity, Tmax 25% (p < 0.001), CBV 9% (p = 0.021), and CBF 44% (p < 0.001). Using all maps gained 56% sensitivity with a specificity of 100%, PPV of 100%, and NPV of 68%. The better sensitivity of the MTT map was also found by Tan [8], with 12/31 (39%) lacunar infarcts patients having a perfusion deficit compared with those with any cortical infarction (120/142, 67%). In Rudilosso [7], with a 128 rows scanner and 98 mm of vertical coverage in CTP acquisition, sensitivity and PPV of CTP for lacunar stroke were higher than non-contrast CT (63% vs. 19%). Conversely, the specificity was low (20%) and influenced by low lacunar stroke prevalence. The most informative map for the identification of ischemic lesions was TTD. In Benson [6], TTP were the maps with the highest sensitivity (49%); specificity was high regardless of the map evaluated (all > 97%). In Garcia-Esperon [15], the automated core-penumbra CTP maps had a decreasing sensitivity for cortical lesions (56.1%), posterior infarcts (25%), and subcortical infarcts (5.9%) but with high specificity (between 87% and 99%). CBV and CBF maps showed low sensitivity for all regions (<20%) with high specificity (>95%). Conversely, MTT and DT maps performed with a low sensitivity for posterior lesions (<30%), moderate for subcortical (between 30% and 40%), and good for cortical lesions (DT 60.6% versus 51.5% for MTT). Assessing together all the CTP maps dramatically increased the detection of subcortical lesions compared to automated core-penumbra maps (42.4% versus 5.9%). Specificity values were over 80% for both modalities for all the regions. In Farooqui [21], increased TTP was observed in 23 (47%) patients, and it was a predictor of ND on multivariate analysis. In general, although the technical differences in the individual studies, time-based maps were found to be more sensitive than flow-based maps. These latter ones performed better in lesions larger than 20 mm caused by multiple perforating branches occlusion [13].
The CTP technique is performed with significant variability between different institutions, and the CTP parameters are affected by the generation of CT scanners, processing software, and optimization in a single institution in the setting of LVO-related stroke [51]. Another source of variability, besides image acquisition and post-processing techniques, is provided by the intrinsic features of cerebral perfusion [51]. In fact, both physiologically and in acute ischemia, brain perfusion is not the same in all areas because of the neuronal activity of different regions, leading to different perfusion patterns in patients with similar occlusion sites and times from stroke onset to imaging acquisition. The efficiency of intrinsic compensatory mechanisms (collateral blood supply, vasodilation, and oxygen extraction at capillary levels) influences this variability in perfusion.
Finally, there are other limitations that increase the heterogeneity and the transferability of the presented data. If a mild variability emerges in the timing of CTP study from symptom onset because most patients were enrolled within routine hyperacute stroke pathways management, the eligibility for CTP was not the same in all studies. In Akhtar [20], 92 + 38 patients were studied by CTP, and the main reason for not doing CTP was a clinical diagnosis of small vessel (lacunar) stroke. In Campbell [10], the rate of patients undergoing CTP increased during the enrollment period.
A potential issue affecting the sensitivity of CTP for small subcortical perfusion abnormalities is the coexistent leukoaraiosis, which in some grades is expected in patients with SVD-related stroke [7,52,53]. Consistent with the pathogenesis of leukoaraiosis, hypoperfusion detected with CTP was found to be associated with white matter disease severity [54,55]. It has been reported that leukoaraiosis mat confounds the CTP estimation of the final infarction in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy [56], but this issue has not been addressed for patients with non-territorial infarctions. The effect of leukoaraiosis has been compensated by the restriction of the core to voxels with both low rCBF and delayed TTP and by automatic detection and removal from the analysis by a Housfield unit threshold [57].
It is possible that a perfusion evaluation distinguishing the penumbra from the core is not possible for RSSI in the same way it is performed for small and large territorial infarctions. The resolution of CTP maps does not allow this task, and it is well described in Garcia-Esperon [15], where, in the lacunar group, the median core volume was 0 [0–0.9] mL [IQR], the median penumbra volume 0.4 [0–2.9] mL [IQR] and the median hypoperfused lesion volume 0.7 [0–4.6] mL [IQR]. These measures correspond to a median volume in DWI of 1.9 [0.8–5.5] mL [IQR], so DWI hyperintensity size is greater than the size of hypoperfused tissue in CTP. Indeed, CTP maps have a relatively low spatial resolution, and small infarcts can be omitted even when they are included in the covered volume. Areas of chronic infarction are generally obvious on NCCT; however, in perfusion, they can be confusing. Most of the tissues with chronic infarction show a low but persistent degree of metabolism and decreased but measurable perfusion parameters [58].
Moreover, gray and white matter do not have the same physiological perfusion features and thresholds. Indeed, gray matter presents higher values of CBF and CBV but lower values of MTT and venous drainage time (VDT), which is in direct relation to its higher energy consumption [58]. Conversely, time-dependent maps (MTT and DT) show higher values in white matter than in the gray matter. It is critical that the contralateral regions of interest used for normalization maintain the same gray matter/white matter ratio as the ipsilateral ischemic region. In fact, CBV and CBF have different baseline values in gray and white matter (CBV: gray matter CBV 4 mL/100 g/min, white matter CBV 2 mL/100 g/min; CBF: gray matter CBF 40–60 mL/100 g/min, white matter CBF 20–30 mL/100 g/min), [59].
CTP appears as an imperfect technique if the aim is to identify an RSSI in comparison to the more sensitive DWI-MRI, which is, in turn, a less imperfect technique but far to be 100% performant. The very low signal-to-noise ratio and the correspondent low contrast in CTP source images and perfusion maps may prevent to identify of small subcortical infarcts, but, as previously detailed, the potential reasons for not detecting a perfusion deficit are several, and in some cases, a perfusion deficit is not present at all. CTP and PWI-MRI studies tell us a different story about the pathophysiology of lacunar infarctions and the underlying mechanisms of tissue damage, growth, and long-term evolution and support the existence of a heterogeneous perfusion pattern in RSSI, as discussed in Zedde et al. [60].

5. Conclusions

Evolving techniques may complete the missing pieces of the unknown about the dynamics of RSSI, although the main aim of CTP in acute stroke pathway management is to identify viable tissue in large and medium vessel occlusions in order to select patients amenable to endovascular treatment. The main conclusion is that the heterogeneity and limitations of CTP techniques are associated with a previously neglected heterogeneity in RSSI perfusion and evolution. Now, RSSI cannot be reliably diagnosed using CTP because the rate of false negatives is still consistent, but it may support the clinical diagnosis in the early phase when a perfusion deficit is seen. Larger, technically homogeneous, and prospective studies are needed to better define the role of CTP in the diagnosis of RSSI.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.P. and M.Z.; methodology, M.Z. and R.P.; literature screening, M.Z. and R.P.; data extraction, M.Z., M.N. and I.G.; formal analysis, M.Z. and R.P.; writing—original draft preparation, M.Z. and R.P.; writing—review and editing, M.Z., M.N., I.G., F.A., C.M., F.V. and R.P.; supervision, F.V. and R.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nogueira, R.G.; Jadhav, A.P.; Haussen, D.C.; Bonafe, A.; Budzik, R.F.; Bhuva, P.; Yavagal, D.R.; Ribo, M.; Cognard, C.; Hanel, R.A.; et al. Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke with a Mismatch between Deficit and Infarct. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 378, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ma, H.; Campbell, B.C.; Parsons, M.W.; Churilov, L.; Levi, C.R.; Hsu, C.; Kleinig, T.J.; Wijeratne, T.; Curtze, S.; Dewey, H.M.; et al. Thrombolysis Guided by Perfusion Imaging up to 9 Hours after Onset of Stroke. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 380, 1795–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Campbell, B.C.V.; Ma, H.; A Ringleb, P.; Parsons, M.W.; Churilov, L.; Bendszus, M.; Levi, C.R.; Hsu, C.; Kleinig, T.J.; Fatar, M.; et al. Extending thrombolysis to 4·5–9 h and wake-up stroke using perfusion imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet 2019, 394, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Berge, E.; Whiteley, W.; Audebert, H.; De Marchis, G.M.; Fonseca, A.C.; Padiglioni, C.; de la Ossa, N.P.; Strbian, D.; Tsivgoulis, G.; Turc, G. European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines on intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Eur. Stroke J. 2021, 6, I–LXII. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Thomalla, G.; Boutitie, F.; Ma, H.; Koga, M.; Ringleb, P.; Schwamm, L.H.; Wu, O.; Bendszus, M.; Bladin, C.F.; Campbell, B.C.V.; et al. Intravenous alteplase for stroke with unknown time of onset guided by advanced imaging: Systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet 2020, 396, 1574–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Benson, J.; Payabvash, S.; Mortazavi, S.; Zhang, L.; Salazar, P.; Hoffman, B.; Oswood, M.; McKinney, A. CT Perfusion in Acute Lacunar Stroke: Detection Capabilities Based on Infarct Location. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2016, 37, 2239–2244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rudilosso, S.; Urra, X.; Román, L.S.; Laredo, C.; Lopez-Rueda, A.; Amaro, S.; Oleaga, L.; Chamorro, Á. Perfusion Deficits and Mismatch in Patients with Acute Lacunar Infarcts Studied with Whole-Brain CT Perfusion. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2015, 36, 1407–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tan, M.Y.Q.; Singhal, S.; Ma, H.; Chandra, R.V.; Cheong, J.; Clissold, B.B.; Ly, J.; Srikanth, V.; Phan, T.G. Examining Subcortical Infarcts in the Era of Acute Multimodality CT Imaging. Front. Neurol. 2016, 7, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lin, K.; Do, K.G.; Ong, P.; Shapiro, M.; Babb, J.S.; Siller, K.A.; Pramanik, B.K. Perfusion CT Improves Diagnostic Accuracy for Hyperacute Ischemic Stroke in the 3-Hour Window: Study of 100 Patients with Diffusion MRI Confirmation. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2009, 28, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Campbell, B.C.V.; Weir, L.; Desmond, P.M.; Tu, H.T.H.; Hand, P.J.; Yan, B.; Donnan, G.; Parsons, M.W.; Davis, S.M. CT perfusion improves diagnostic accuracy and confidence in acute ischaemic stroke. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2013, 84, 613–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Stroup, D.F.; Berlin, J.A.; Morton, S.C.; Olkin, I.; Williamson, G.D.; Rennie, D.; Moher, D.; Becker, B.J.; Sipe, T.A.; Thacker, S.B. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. JAMA 2000, 283, 2008–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hozo, S.P.; Djulbegovic, B.; Hozo, I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2005, 5, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hu, W.; Zhu, C.; Qin, W. Perfusion Deficits in Different Mechanisms of Two Subtypes of Acute Stroke with Diffusion MRI confirmation. Curr. Neurovasc. Res. 2022. preprint. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cao, W.; Yassi, N.; Sharma, G.; Yan, B.; Desmond, P.M.; Davis, S.M.; Campbell, B.C. Diagnosing acute lacunar infarction using CT perfusion. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2016, 29, 70–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Garcia-Esperon, C.; Visser, M.; Churilov, L.; Miteff, F.; Bivard, A.; Lillicrap, T.; Levi, C.R.; Spratt, N.J.; Parsons, M.W. Role of Computed Tomography Perfusion in Identification of Acute Lacunar Stroke Syndromes. Stroke 2021, 52, 339–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Das, T.; Settecase, F.; Boulos, M.; Huynh, T.; d’Esterre, C.D.; Symons, S.P.; Zhang, L.; Aviv, R.I. Multimodal CT provides improved per-formance for lacunar infarct detection. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2015, 36, 1069–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Eckert, B.; Küsel, T.; Leppien, A.; Michels, P.; Müller-Jensen, A.; Fiehler, J. Clinical outcome and imaging follow-up in acute stroke patients with normal perfusion CT and normal CT angiography. Neuroradiology 2010, 53, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hana, T.; Iwama, J.; Yokosako, S.; Yoshimura, C.; Arai, N.; Kuroi, Y.; Koseki, H.; Akiyama, M.; Hirota, K.; Ohbuchi, H.; et al. Sensitivity of CT perfusion for the diagnosis of cerebral infarction. J. Med. Investig. 2014, 61, 41–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rudilosso, S.; Laredo, C.; Mancosu, M.; Moya-Planas, N.; Zhao, Y.; Chirife, O.; Chamorro, Á.; Urra, X. Cerebral Perfusion and Compensatory Blood Supply in Patients with Recent Small Subcortical Infarcts. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2019, 39, 1326–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Akhtar, N.; Kamran, S.; Elkhider, H.; Al-Makki, S.; Mhjob, N.; ElShiekh, L.; AlHussain, H.; Ali, M.; Khodair, R.; Wadiwala, F.; et al. Progression of stroke deficits in patients presenting with mild symptoms: The underlying etiology determines outcome. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0231448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nagaraja, N.; Farooqui, A.; Albayram, M.S.; Reddy, V.B.N. Neurological deterioration and computed tomography perfusion changes with increased time to peak in lacunar stroke. Brain Circ. 2022, 8, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Oppenheim, C.; Lamy, C.; Touze, E.; Calvet, D.; Hamon, M.; Mas, J.L.; Méder, J.F. Do transient ischemic attacks with diffusion-weighted imaging abnormalities corre-spond to brain infarctions? Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2006, 27, 1782–1787. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. McVerry, F.; Dani, K.A.; MacDougall, N.J.; MacLeod, M.J.; Wardlaw, J.; Muir, K.W. Derivation and Evaluation of Thresholds for Core and Tissue at Risk of Infarction Using CT Perfusion. J. Neuroimaging 2014, 24, 562–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jiang, S.; Cui, J.-Y.; Yan, Y.-Y.; Yang, T.; Tao, W.-D.; Wu, B. Association of compromised cerebral perfusion with lenticulostriate artery impairments in the subacute phase of branch atheromatous disease. Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 2022, 15, 17562864221109746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bollwein, C.; Plate, A.; Sommer, W.H.; Thierfelder, K.M.; Janssen, H.; Reiser, M.F.; Straube, A.; von Baumgarten, L. Diagnostic accuracy of whole-brain CT perfusion in the detection of acute infratentorial infarctions. Neuroradiology 2016, 58, 1077–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ay, H.; Buonanno, F.; Rordorf, G.; Schaefer, P.; Schwamm, L.; Wu, O.; Gonzalez, R.; Yamada, K.; Sorensen, G.; Koroshetz, W. Normal diffusion-weighted MRI during stroke-like deficits. Neurology 1999, 52, 1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. González, R.G.; Schaefer, P.W.; Buonanno, F.S.; Schwamm, L.; Budzik, R.F.; Rordorf, G.; Wang, B.; Sorensen, A.G.; Koroshetz, W.J. Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging: Diagnostic Accuracy in Patients Imaged within 6 Hours of Stroke Symptom Onset. Radiology 1999, 210, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ghaznawi, R.; I Geerlings, M.; Jaarsma-Coes, M.; Zwartbol, M.H.; Kuijf, H.J.; Van Der Graaf, Y.; Witkamp, T.D.; Hendrikse, J.; De Bresser, J. The association between lacunes and white matter hyperintensity features on MRI: The SMART-MR study. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2019, 39, 2486–2496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Biesbroek, J.; Niesten, J.; Dankbaar, J.; Biessels, G.; Velthuis, B.; Reitsma, J.; van der Schaaf, I. Diagnostic Accuracy of CT Perfusion Imaging for Detecting Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2013, 35, 493–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Caplan, L.R. Lacunar Infarction and Small Vessel Disease: Pathology and Pathophysiology. J. Stroke 2015, 17, 2–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Hernández, M.D.C.V.; Grimsley-Moore, T.; Sakka, E.; Thrippleton, M.J.; Chappell, F.M.; Armitage, P.A.; Makin, S.; Wardlaw, J.M. Lacunar Stroke Lesion Extent and Location and White Matter Hyperintensities Evolution 1 Year Post-lacunar Stroke. Front. Neurol. 2021, 12, 640498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Förster, A.; Mürle, B.; Böhme, J.; Al-Zghloul, M.; Kerl, H.U.; Wenz, H.; Groden, C. Perfusion-weighted imaging and dynamic 4D angio-grams for the estimation of collateral blood flow in lacunar infarction. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2016, 36, 1744–1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tao, W.; Cheng, Y.; Guo, W.; Kwapong, W.R.; Ye, C.; Wu, B.; Zhang, S.; Liu, M. Clinical features and imaging markers of small vessel disease in symptomatic acute subcortical cerebral microinfarcts. BMC Neurol. 2022, 22, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chalela, J.A.; Ezzeddine, M.; Latour, L.; Warach, S. Reversal of perfusion and diffusion abnormalities after intravenous thrombo-lysis for a lacunar infarction. J. Neuroimaging 2003, 13, 152–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Keir, S.L.; Wardlaw, J.M. Systematic review of diffusion and perfusion imaging in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2000, 31, 2723–2731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Del Bene, A.; Makin, S.; Doubal, F.N.; Inzitari, D.; Wardlaw, J.M. Variation in Risk Factors for Recent Small Subcortical Infarcts with Infarct Size, Shape, and Location. Stroke 2013, 44, 3000–3006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Redgrave, J.N.; Coutts, S.B.; Schulz, U.G.; Briley, D.; Rothwell, P.M. Systematic Review of Associations Between the Presence of Acute Ischemic Lesions on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Clinical Predictors of Early Stroke Risk After Transient Ischemic Attack. Stroke 2007, 38, 1482–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Schulz, U.G.; Briley, D.; Meagher, T.; Molyneux, A.; Rothwell, P.M. Diffusion-Weighted MRI in 300 Patients Presenting Late with Subacute Transient Ischemic Attack or Minor Stroke. Stroke 2004, 35, 2459–2465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kidwell, C.S.; Alger, J.R.; Di Salle, F.; Starkman, S.; Villablanca, P.; Bentson, J.; Saver, J. Diffusion MRI in Patients with Transient Ischemic Attacks. Stroke 1999, 30, 1174–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Engelter, S.T.; Provenzale, J.M.; Petrella, J.R.; Alberts, M.J. Diffusion MR Imaging and Transient Ischemic Attacks. Stroke 1999, 30, 2759–2768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Winbeck, K.; Bruckmaier, K.; Etgen, T.; Von Einsiedel, H.G.; Röttinger, M.; Sander, D. Transient Ischemic Attack and Stroke Can Be Differentiated by Analyzing Early Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Signal Intensity Changes. Stroke 2004, 35, 1095–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Engelter, S.T.; Wetzel, S.G.; Radue, E.W.; Rausch, M.; Steck, A.J.; Lyrer, P.A. The clinical significance of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in infratentorial strokes. Neurology 2004, 62, 574–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lövblad, K.O.; Laubach, H.J.; E Baird, A.; Curtin, F.; Schlaug, G.; Edelman, R.R.; Warach, S. Clinical experience with diffusion-weighted MR in patients with acute stroke. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 1998, 19, 1061–1066. [Google Scholar]
  44. van Everdingen, K.; van der Grond, J.; Kappelle, L.; Ramos, L.; Mali, W. Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Acute Stroke. Stroke 1998, 29, 1783–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Oppenheim, C.; Stanescu, R.; Dormont, D.; Crozier, S.; Marro, B.; Samson, Y.; Rancurel, G.; Marsault, C. False-negative Diffusion-weighted MR Findings in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2000, 21, 1434–1440. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Wang, P.Y.-K.; Barker, P.B.; Wityk, R.J.; Uluğ, A.M.; Van Zijl, P.C.M.; Beauchamp, N.J. Diffusion-Negative Stroke: A Report of Two Cases. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 1999, 20, 1876–1880. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Zuo, L.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, X.; Li, Y.; Bao, H.; Hao, J.; Wang, X.; Li, G. A retrospective analysis of negative diffusion-weighted image results in patients with acute cerebral infarction. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, srep08910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Sylaja, P.; Coutts, S.B.; Krol, A.; Hill, M.D.; Demchuk, A.M. When to Expect Negative Diffusion-Weighted Images in Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack. Stroke 2008, 39, 1898–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Roberts, H.C.; Roberts, T.P.L.; Smith, W.S.; Lee, T.J.; Fischbein, N.J.; Dillon, W.P. Multisection Dynamic CT Perfusion for Acute Cerebral Ischemia: The “Toggling-table” Technique. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2001, 22, 1077–1080. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  50. Youn, S.W.; Kim, J.H.; Weon, Y.-C.; Kim, S.H.; Han, M.-K.; Bae, H.-J. Perfusion CT of the Brain Using 40-mm-Wide Detector and Toggling Table Technique for Initial Imaging of Acute Stroke. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2008, 191, W120–W126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Heit, J.J.; Wintermark, M. Perfusion computed tomography for the evaluation of acute ischemic stroke: Strengths and pitfalls. Stroke 2016, 47, 1153–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Wintermark, M.; Smith, W.S.; Ko, N.U.; Quist, M.; Schnyder, P.; Dillon, W.P. Dynamic perfusion CT: Optimizing the temporal resolu-tion and contrast volume for calculation of perfusion CT parameters in stroke patients. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2004, 25, 720–729. [Google Scholar]
  53. Yi, F.; Cai, M.; Jacob, M.A.; Marques, J.; Norris, D.G.; Duering, M.; Tuladhar, A.M.; de Leeuw, F.-E. Spatial Relation Between White Matter Hyperintensities and Incident Lacunes of Presumed Vascular Origin: A 14-Year Follow-Up Study. Stroke 2022, 53, 3688–3695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Huynh, T.; Murphy, B.; Pettersen, J.; Tu, H.; Sahlas, D.; Zhang, L.; Symons, S.; Black, S.; Lee, T.-Y.; Aviv, R. CT Perfusion Quantification of Small-Vessel Ischemic Severity. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2008, 29, 1831–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ramli, N.; Ho, K.; Nawawi, O.; Chong, H.; Tan, C. CT perfusion as a useful tool in the evaluation of leuko-araiosis. Biomed. Imaging Interv. J. 2006, 2, e16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Rudilosso, S.; Laredo, C.; Vivancos, C.; Urra, X.; Llull, L.; Renú, A.; Obach, V.; Zhao, Y.; Moreno, J.; Lopez-Rueda, A.; et al. Leukoaraiosis May Confound the Interpretation of CT Perfusion in Patients Treated with Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2019, 40, 1323–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Campbell, B.C.V.; Christensen, S.; Levi, C.; Desmond, P.M.; Donnan, G.; Davis, S.M.; Parsons, M.W. Comparison of Computed Tomography Perfusion and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Perfusion-Diffusion Mismatch in Ischemic Stroke. Stroke 2012, 43, 2648–2653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Leiva-Salinas, C.; Provenzale, J.M.; Wintermark, M. Responses to the 10 Most Frequently Asked Questions About Perfusion CT. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2011, 196, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Konstas, A.; Goldmakher, G.; Lee, T.-Y.; Lev, M. Theoretic Basis and Technical Implementations of CT Perfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke, Part 2: Technical Implementations. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2009, 30, 885–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zedde, M.; Napoli, M.; Grisendi, I.; Assenza, I.; Moratti, C.; Valzania, F.; Pascarella, R. The perfusion status in lacunar stroke: A pathophysiological issue. In preparation.
Diagnostics 13 01564 g001 550
Figure 1. PRISMA 2020 flow diagram. *, 10 case reports, 10 papers about nonlacunar stroke, seven studies not using CTP, four papers not pertinent to stroke, two replies, two pictorial or narrative reviews, two conference abstracts, one animal model. **. There are nine studies without data con CTP in lacunar stroke, six studies on nonlacunar stroke, five narrative reviews, three papers focused on technical protocol, two conference abstracts, two systematic reviews not focused on lacunar stroke, 1 study protocol, one letter without new data.
Figure 1. PRISMA 2020 flow diagram. *, 10 case reports, 10 papers about nonlacunar stroke, seven studies not using CTP, four papers not pertinent to stroke, two replies, two pictorial or narrative reviews, two conference abstracts, one animal model. **. There are nine studies without data con CTP in lacunar stroke, six studies on nonlacunar stroke, five narrative reviews, three papers focused on technical protocol, two conference abstracts, two systematic reviews not focused on lacunar stroke, 1 study protocol, one letter without new data.
Diagnostics 13 01564 g001
Table
Table 1. Main methodological data and definitions from the selected papers.
Table 1. Main methodological data and definitions from the selected papers.
ReferenceCountryStudy DesignStudy PeriodPopulationLacunar Stroke DefinitionNeuroimaging Comparator
Zhu 2022 [13]ChinaMonocenter retrospective cohortJanuary–December 2021599 CTP examinations in patients with acute stroke symptoms within 12 h and MRI within 7 days of symptom onsetIntracerebral lesions < 20 mm in diameter and fewer than 3 slices or a lesion within the pontine parenchyma on DWI-MRIMRI
Tan 2016 [8]AustraliaMonocenter retrospective cohortApril 2009–March 2013182 patients with ischemic stroke Single subcortical infarct ≤ 20 mm on follow-up MRIMRI (median time 15 days)
Cao 2016 [14]AustraliaRetrospective cohort2009–201363 patients (32 with RSSI and 30 without lesions on DWI)Ovoid DWI hyperintensities with maximum diameter ≤ 25 mm in the territory of small penetrating arteries (thalamus, striatum, or corona radiata)MRI (within 48 h)
García-Esperón
2021 [15]		AustraliaRetrospective analysisJanuary 2010–June 2018712 DWI-confirmed stroke patientsCombination of clinical lacunar syndromes, hyperintensity on DWI-MRI in a penetrating vessel territory and no visible vessel occlusion in that regionDWI-MRI
Rudilosso 2015 [7]SpainRetrospective analysisJanuary 2009–December 201233 patients with lacunar syndromeInfarct volume < 1.767 cm3 (the volume of a sphere with a diameter 1.5 cm) on DWIMRI; median delay 26 h (IQR 18–43 h)
Das, 2015 [16]UKRetrospective cohortMarch 2011–February 201388 patients with lacunar syndrome RSSI: 59/88 (67%).Solitary, subcortical lesions, ≤ 20 mm in greatest diameterMRI (median time 2d, IQR 1–4.25 d)
Benson 2016 [6]USARetrospective cohortJanuary 2006–July 2011113 patients: 37 (32.7%) lacunar Infarcts < 20 mm in maximum diameter on DWI (either cortical or subcortical)MRI within 7 days
Lin 2009 [9]GermanyRetrospective cohortJanuary 2004–May 200865 consecutive stroke patients < 3 h and receiving NCCT and CTP and follow-up DWI < 7 daysDWI < 15 mmDWI-MRI within 7 days
Eckert 2011 [17]GermanyRetrospective cohortApril 2007–April 2008107 stroke patients within 6 hNot statedMRI within 2 to 5 days
CT if contraindication to MRI
Campbell 2013 [10]AustraliaRetrospective cohortJanuary 2009–September 2011277/475 (58%) ischemic stroke patients < 9 h/wake-up onset studied by CTPNot statedCT or MRI
Hana 2014 [18]JapanRetrospective cohortOctober 2008–October 201187 patients with ischemic stroke with CTP at the admission and DWI-MRI post hospitalizationNot statedDWI-MRI
Rudilosso 2019 [19] SpainRetrospective cohortMay 2011–September 2016Acute stroke patients undergoing CTA + CTPRSSI according to the STRIVE definition (a symptomatic hyperintensity in the territory of one perforating arteriole measuring < 20 mm in its maximum diameter in the axial plane on DWI)DWI-MRI
Akhtar 2020 [20]QatarRetrospective cohortJanuary 2014–April 2017506 acute stroke patientsNot statedNA
Farooqui 2022 [21]USARetrospective cohortMarch 2015–June 2016Patients with lacunar stroke who had magnetic resonance imaging and CTP performedNot statedDWI-MRI
CTP: CT Perfusion; DWI: diffusion-weighted imaging; MRI: Magnetic Resonance Imaging; NCCT: noncontrast CT.
Table
Table 2. Main demographic and neuroimaging findings.
Table 2. Main demographic and neuroimaging findings.
ReferenceLacunar Stroke Patients (N)Women (%)Mean Age (years)CTP Technical NotesCTP Findings
Zhu 2022 [13]2937.966.9 ± 9.4Scanner: 64-section multidetector scanner (Revolution Frontier, GE Healthcare, Siemens)
Post-processing software: d fast-processing of ischemic stroke (F-STROKE) software [22]
Perfusion maps: TTP, CBF, CBV, MTT		5/18 (27.8%) in the lacunar stroke group had perfusion deficits in the supratentorial region
Tan 2016 [8]314466.4 ± 15.3Scanner: General Electric 750HD 64-slice CT scanner or a Philips 128-slice CT scanner
Post-processing software: Advantage Windows (GE Medical Systems) and Extended Brilliance Workspace (Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherlands)
Perfusion maps: MTT		12/31 (39%) lacunar stroke patients had a perfusion deficit compared with those with any cortical infarction (120/142, 67%)
Cao 2016 [14]323270 ([IQR] 56–79)Scanner: Somatom 16-slice scanner, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany)
Post-processing software: RAPID iSchemicView (Menlo Park, CA, USA)
Perfusion maps: CBF, CBV, MTT, and Tmax		The sensitivity of CTP vs. DWI-MRI was 56% for MTT, and significantly lower for Tmax (25%, p < 0.001), CBV (9%, p = 0.021) and CBF (44%, p < 0.001). Using all four maps gained 56% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% PPV and 68% NPV.
García-Esperón 2021 [15]59/106 (55.7%) (59 RSSI, 33 cortical and 14 infratentorial strokes)NA70 (59–79)Scanner: Aquilion 320-slice CT
scanner (Toshiba)
Post-processing software: MIStar (Apollo Medical Imaging Technology, Melbourne, Australia)
Perfusion maps: CBF, CBV, MTT, DT		42% SE, 80% SP for RSSI. Visual inspection of CTP maps had higher sensitivity than the automated method (42% vs. 6%).
Rudilosso 2015 [7]1637.562.6Scanner: Somatom definition Flash 128-slices dual-source CT system
Post-processing software: visual assessment by using CT Neuro Perfusion Syngo.via (Siemens Healthcare GmbH); core/penumbra threshold analysis by using MIStar (Apollo Medical Imaging Technology, Melbourne, Australia)
Perfusion maps: CBF, CBV, MTT, Tmax, TTP, TTD and MIP		The sensitivity and PPV of CTP were higher than NCCT (63% vs. 19%).
The sensitivity of CTP was higher for supratentorial than for infratentorial (65% vs. 16%). Specificity was low (20%).
TTD was the most informative map.
Das, 2015 [16]59 (14/59 pontine)NA72Scanner: 64-section CT scanner
Postprocessing software: CT Perfusion 4, GE Healthcare
Perfusion maps: CBV, CBF and MTT		36/59 (61%) with a concordant abnormal findings between DWI-MRI and CTP
Benson 2016 [6]37 (all supratentorial)53.159.8 ± 16.9Scanner: 64-section CT scanner
Post-processing software: Vitrea workstation (Vital Imaged, Minnetonka, Minnesota)
Perfusion maps: TTP, MTT, CBV and CBF		Sensitivity was highest for TTP (49%), and lowest for NCCT (3%). Specigicity mantained high with any map (all > 97%).
Lin 2009 [9]13/65NANAScanner: 16-slice scanners (Siemens Sensation, Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany)
Postprocessing software: Siemens Syngo Neuro Perfusion CT, Siemens AG
Perfusion maps: CBF, CBV, TTP		CTP detected 2/13 (15.4%) LI that were within its coverage volume
Eckert 2011 [17]54 with no occlusion on CTA NA68.4Scanner: 40-row multidetector CT scan, Brilliance 40 (Philips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands)
Post-processing software: Philips Medical System, Best, The Netherlands
Perfusion maps: MTT, CBF, CBV and TTP		23/54 (42.59%) patients had normal MMCT and positive follow-up MRI 16/23 (69.56%) were lacunar infarcts within the CTP perfusion maps, 4 were infratentorial infarcts and 3 were territorial infarcts beyond the perfusion maps.
Campbell 2013 [10]NANA Scanner: Siemens Somatom 16-slice multidetector scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany)
Postprocessing software: Siemens Syngo NeuroPCT, Siemens
Perfusion maps: TTP, CBF, CBV
Visual assessment of unthresholded TTP and CBV/CBF maps		Non-diagnostic CTP was due to lacunar infarction (28 (10%)), infarct outside slab coverage (21 (8%)), technical failure (4 (1%)) and reperfusion (2 (0.7%)).
Hana 2014 [18]NANA Scanner: 64 row detector CT scanner (LightSpeed VCT XT; GE)
Post-processing software: CTP software developed by GE Health care
Perfusion maps: MTT, CBV, CBF 		55/87 CTP deficit with highr sensitivity in infarcts < 3 cm; sensitivity 0% for lacunar infarction
Rudilosso 2019 [19] 74 RSSI4066.3 (12.1)Scanner: Somatom Definition Flash 128-section dual-source CT system (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany)
Postprocessing software: Syngo CT Neuro Perfusion VA20 (Siemens)
Perfusion maps: CBF, CBV, TTP and TTD 		On visual inspection, hypoperfusion on CTP was identified in 51 patients (76%), perfusion was normal in 12 patients (18%) and hyperperfusion was observed in the remaining 4 patients (6%).
Akhtar 2020 [20]130NANAScanner: NA
Postprocessing software: NA
Perfusion maps: NA		The main reason for not doing CTP was a clinical diagnosis of small vessel (lacunar) stroke.
Farooqui 2022 [21]49 (19 ND + 30 no ND)25 (10 + 15)/49 51.02%65 ± 13 vs. 62 ± 15Scanner: 320–detector row scanner (Toshiba
Aquilion One; Toshiba Medical Imaging, Tokyo Japan)
Postprocessing software: Vitrea; Vital Images Minnetonka, Minnesota, USA
Perfusion maps: CBF, CBV, MTT, TTP		63% of patients had stroke diameters < 10 mm. ND patients have a trend for increased TTP in the stroke area compared to the no ND patients [12 (63%) vs. 11 (37%), p = 0.07]. 8 patients had a change in CBV without difference between the two groups.
Increased TTP was a predictor of ND on multivariate analysis.
MTT was not assessed, considering TTP more sensitive.
CBF: cerebral blood flow; CBV: cerebral blood volume; CTP: CT perfusion; DT: delay time; DWI: diffusion-weighted imaging; MIP: maximum intensity projection; MTT: mean transient time; ND: neurological deterioration; NPV: negative predictive value; NCCT: noncontrast CT; PPV: positive predictive value; RSSI: recent small subcortical infarct; SE: sensitivity; SP: specificity; Tmax: time to maximum; TTD: time to drain; TTP: time to peak.
Table
Table 3. Perfusion maps were examined in the selected studies.
Table 3. Perfusion maps were examined in the selected studies.
ReferenceCBFCBVMTTDT 1TMaxTTPTTDVertical Coverage (mm)
Zhu 2022 [13]YYY Y NR
Tan 2016 [8] Y 80 2
Cao 2016 [14]YYY Y
García-Esperón 2021 [15]YYYY 160
Rudilosso 2015 [7]YYY YYY98
Das, 2015 [16]YYY NR
Benson 2016 [6]YYY Y 80 4
Lin 2009 [9]YY Y 24
Eckert 2011 [17]YYY Y 40
Campbell 2013 [10]YY Y 24 4
Hana 2014 [18]YYY 80 3
Rudilosso 2019 [19] YY YY98
Akhtar 2020 [20]NANANANANANANANR
Farooqui 2022 [21]YYY Y 160
1 DT maps are calculated very similarly to Tmax (time to maximum) and are used to define the perfusion lesion, with slightly better accuracy; 2 shuttle mode; 3 toggling table CT technique [26,27]; 4 Two slabs; NR: not reported; NA: not assessed. CBF: cerebral blood flow; CBV: cerebral blood volume; CTP: CT perfusion; DT: delay time; MTT: mean transient time; Tmax: time to maximum; TTD: time to drain; TTP: time to peak. Y: yes.
Table
Table 4. Sensitivity and specificity data of CTP for RSSI.
Table 4. Sensitivity and specificity data of CTP for RSSI.
ReferenceSensitivitySpecificityPPVNPV
García-Esperón
2021 [15]		CTP core/pen: 5.9%CTP core/pen: 93.6%CTP core/pen: 53.8%CTP core/pen: 44.2%
CBV 2.5%CBV 97.9%CBV 60%CBV 44.4%
CBF 5.1%CBF 97.9%CBF 75%CBF 45.1%
MTT 39.8%MTT 90.4%MTT 83.9%MTT 54.5%
DT 33.9%DT 91.5%DT 83.9%DT 52.4%
Any positive map: 42.4%Any positive map: 89.4%Any positive map 83.3%Any positive map: 55.3%
Rudilosso 2015 [7]62.5%20%
Das, 2015 [16]9.3–42.5%91.9–95.3%
Benson 2016 [6]All sites: 18.9% (CBV), 48.7% (TTP)
CSWM 65.2%
PWM: 12.5–37.5%
BGT: 0%		All sites: 97.4% (CBF-TTP), 98.7% (CBV-MTT)81.8% (CBF), 92.9% (MTT)71.4% (CBV), 80% (TTP)
Lin 2009 [9]15.4%100%100%82.5%
Eckert 2011 [17]0%100%0%100%
Hana 2014 [18]0%100%0%100%
Cao 2016 [14]MTT 56%
Tmax 25%
CBV 9%
CBF 44%
All maps 56% 		All maps 100%All maps 100%All maps: 68%
CBF: cerebral blood flow; CBV: cerebral blood volume; CTP: CT perfusion; DT: delay time; MTT: mean transient time; PPV: positive predictive value; Tmax: time to maximum; TTP: time to peak.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zedde, M.; Napoli, M.; Grisendi, I.; Assenza, F.; Moratti, C.; Valzania, F.; Pascarella, R. CT Perfusion in Lacunar Stroke: A Systematic Review. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 1564. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13091564

AMA Style

Zedde M, Napoli M, Grisendi I, Assenza F, Moratti C, Valzania F, Pascarella R. CT Perfusion in Lacunar Stroke: A Systematic Review. Diagnostics. 2023; 13(9):1564. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13091564

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zedde, Marialuisa, Manuela Napoli, Ilaria Grisendi, Federica Assenza, Claudio Moratti, Franco Valzania, and Rosario Pascarella. 2023. "CT Perfusion in Lacunar Stroke: A Systematic Review" Diagnostics 13, no. 9: 1564. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13091564

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop