Next Article in Journal
Blood-Pressure-Monitoring Smartphone Applications: Ushering in a New Era of Wearable Cardiac Devices? Comment on Vischer et al. Comparability of a Blood-Pressure-Monitoring Smartphone Application with Conventional Measurements—A Pilot Study. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 749
Next Article in Special Issue
SARS-CoV-2 Detection via RT-PCR in Matched Saliva and Nasopharyngeal Samples Reveals High Concordance in Different Commercial Assays
Previous Article in Journal
Prediction of HELLP Syndrome Severity Using Machine Learning Algorithms—Results from a Retrospective Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Soluble ST2 as a Useful Biomarker for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Health Research and Education during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Australian Clinician and Researcher Perspective

Diagnostics 2023, 13(2), 289; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13020289
by Dennis J. Cordato 1,2,3,†, Kaneez Fatima Shad 2,4,5,6,†, Wissam Soubra 2,4,7 and Roy G. Beran 1,2,3,8,9,10,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Diagnostics 2023, 13(2), 289; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13020289
Submission received: 25 November 2022 / Revised: 23 December 2022 / Accepted: 9 January 2023 / Published: 12 January 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The article is written in not proper manner. It’s lack of creation a hypothesis,  methodology part, discussion part, comparison with other research results. More is lack of    the theoretical and practical implications of the research results,   the research limits further research directions.

 

Author Response

Thank you for your advice, please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear authors,

The submitted manuscript is well-written and its topic (the impact of the COVID pandemic on health education and research- the Australian perspective) is quite interesting.

I do not have anyhting to add or propose. 

 

Author Response

Thank you for your advice, please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

I would like to thank the editor for giving me the opportunity to review the manuscript. I commend the authors for the review ‘Health research and education during and after the COVID pandemic…’. The manuscript is well written. I have a couple of comments which I understand will benefit the general reader and improve the quality of the manuscript.

 

1.     Page 4, paragraph 5, first line: Pls change ‘Competency Medical Based Education (CBME)’ to ‘Competency-Based…’.

2.     For the benefit of the reader, pls elaborate in brief on ‘Competency-based Medical Based Education’ and ‘Augmented Reality’, and how they were implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic.

3.     Page 9: Pls delete the DOI of reference number 35.

Author Response

Thank you for your advice, please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I did review and decided to reject an article on 7'th December. I can't change my decision.

Back to TopTop