Next Article in Journal
Clinical Characterization and Outcomes of Culture- and Polymerase Chain Reaction-Negative Cases of Infectious Keratitis
Next Article in Special Issue
The Prevalence of Liver Fibrosis Stages on More than 23,000 Liver Stiffness Measurements by Vibration-Controlled Transient Elastography: A Single Center Study
Previous Article in Journal
Echocardiographic Evaluation of Aortic Stenosis: A Comprehensive Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Laparoscopic Extended Left Lateral Sectionectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Patient with Right-Sided Ligamentum Teres: A Case Report and Literature Review

Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asahikawa Medical University, 2-1-1 Midorigaoka Higashi, Asahikawa 078-8510, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2023, 13(15), 2529; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13152529
Submission received: 7 June 2023 / Revised: 21 July 2023 / Accepted: 24 July 2023 / Published: 29 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnostic Imaging of Liver Diseases)

Abstract

:
Right-sided ligamentum teres (RSLT) is a rare anatomic variant in which the fetal umbilical vein connects to the right portal vein. Patients with RSLT frequently have hepatic vasculature and bile duct anomalies, which increase the risk of complications with hepatectomy. Most patients with RSLT undergo open hepatectomy. Herein, we describe a patient with RSLT and hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy. The patient was a 69-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma located in the left liver based on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging. Imaging also demonstrated RSLT. Three-dimensional CT analysis revealed independent right lateral type anomalies of the portal vein and bile duct. A laparoscopic extended left lateral sectionectomy was performed after careful surgical planning. Ultrasonography was used frequently during surgery to avoid damaging the right hepatic vasculature. The left lateral and partial left median sections were removed as planned. The patient’s postoperative recovery was uneventful. Avoiding injury to the right hepatic vasculature is essential when performing left lobectomy, including left lateral sectionectomy, in patients with RSLT. Laparoscopic hepatectomy can be performed safely in patients with RSLT, provided that careful surgical planning is conducted using preoperative three-dimensional CT analysis and intraoperative ultrasonography.

1. Introduction

Right-sided ligamentum teres (RSLT) is a rare anatomical variant in which the fetal umbilical vein is connected to the right paramedian trunk of the portal vein instead of the left portal vein [1]. The reported incidence rates of RSLT range between 0.2% and 1.2% [1,2]. The ligamentum teres is the remnant of the functioning fetal umbilical vein. RSLT is thought to result from obstruction of the left umbilical vein during development, which causes persistence of the right umbilical vein; normally, the right umbilical vein obliterates and the left one persists [3]. In the past, many cases of RSLT were reported as a left-sided gallbladder because the ligamentum teres and gallbladder often assumed the opposite position to normal [1,2]. However, a left-sided gallbladder associated with RSLT is actually an abnormality of the position of the ligamentum teres and should be distinguished from a “true” left-sided gallbladder, which is an abnormality of the position of the gallbladder itself [2,4]. Liver resection in patients with RSLT should be performed cautiously because this variant is associated with a high frequency of portal vein, hepatic vein, and bile duct abnormalities [5]. For this reason, most liver tumor patients with RSLT undergo open hepatectomy [6]. Herein, we report a patient with RSLT who successfully underwent laparoscopic extended lateral sectionectomy for the resection of hepatocellular carcinoma.

2. Case Report

A 69-year-old man was referred for an evaluation of a liver tumor detected on abdominal ultrasonography performed for a nonalcoholic steatohepatitis follow-up. Blood testing showed elevations in concentrations of aspartate transaminase (56 U/L), alanine transaminase (51 U/L), and protein induced by vitamin K absence-II (224 mAU/mL). Other tumor markers and hepatitis virus markers were negative. The indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min was 15.2% and the Child–Pugh score was 5 points (class A), suggesting good hepatic function. Computed tomography (CT) showed a 2.4 × 2.0 cm hypodense mass in the left lobe of the liver (segment 2/3/4b) which exhibited early arterial enhancement and washout (Figure 1). Hepatocellular carcinoma was highly suspected. In addition, the ligamentum teres was connected to the right anterior branch of the portal vein, and the gallbladder was located to its left, indicating RSLT (Figure 2). On magnetic resonance imaging, the mass had low signal intensity on T1-weighted images and high signal intensity on T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted images; contrasted imaging using gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid revealed a perfusion defect in the mass in the liver phase (Figure 3). Three-dimensional CT (Synapse Vincent® Fujifilm Medical, Tokyo, Japan) demonstrated the right posterior, right anterior, and left branches of the portal vein. The left branch branched into a lateral superior branch (P2) and a lateral inferior branch (P3) after two medial branches (P4a,b) separated. A right inferior hepatic vein and a hepatic vein of an anterior superior segment (V8) were present (Figure 4). Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography revealed that the bile duct system was trifurcated into the right posterior, right anterior branch, and left branches (Figure 5). After the pertinent anatomy was clarified and the preoperative evaluation was completed, we elected to perform laparoscopic extended lateral sectionectomy.
Surgery was performed with the patient in the supine position using a 2K high-definition/three-dimensional monitor. Five laparoscopy ports were placed: a 12 mm camera port at the umbilicus, 12 mm ports below the xiphoid process and the right rib arch, and 5 mm ports outside the right and left rib arches. After confirming the RSLT and the location of the gallbladder (Figure 6A), the falciform ligament and left triangular ligament were dissected. The tumor was then located using ultrasonography. To determine the extent of resection while avoiding damage to the right-sided vasculature, the head side was marked at the boundary between the segment 4b and the right anterior section (Figure 6B), and the caudal side was marked at the line where the segment 4a remained (Figure 6C). The liver resection was performed using a cavitational ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA® Excel; Integra, Princeton, NJ, USA) and ultrasonic scalpel (Harmonic® HD 1000i shears; Ethicon, Raritan, NJ, USA). The medial inferior, medial superior, lateral inferior, and lateral superior branches of Glisson and left hepatic vein were individually double-clipped using a polymer locking ligation system (Hem-o-lok®; Teleflex, Wayne, PA, USA) and resected. Thin vein branches were clipped using a metallic clip applier (Endo Clip®; Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) and cut. Finally, the left lateral section, including the partial left median section, was resected (Figure 6D–F). The operation time was 7 h and 35 min. The blood loss volume was 109 mL. The patient’s postoperative recovery was uneventful and he was discharged on postoperative day 7. The final pathological diagnosis was well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma.

3. Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, laparoscopic sectionectomy for a malignant liver tumor in a patient with RSLT has been reported only once previously [6]. Most patients with RSLT are treated using open surgery because of the high frequency of vascular and bile duct abnormalities [5]. However, the laparoscopic approach can be safe and effective with adequate preoperative and intraoperative imaging evaluations.
Our patient exhibited an independent posterior branch of the portal venous system, which is present in more than half of patients with RSLT [1,2,5]. Shindoh et al. classified RSLT into three types based on the portal branching pattern: bifurcation, trifurcation, and independent right lateral (posterior) type [1]. In contrast, Terasaki et al. classified patients into four types: one bilateral ligamentum teres group and three RSLT groups (bifurcation, trifurcation, and independent posterior branch types) [5,7]. The newer Terasaki system may become the standard in the future. Regarding hepatic veins in patients with RSLT, a thick vein running along the ventral–dorsal segment border of the anterior sector and a developed V8 are likely to be present [1,5]. Our patient exhibited a developed V8. Because the middle hepatic vein (MHV) in patients with RSLT tends to be atrophic and displaced medially, the V8 may be misidentified as the MHV and should be treated with caution [5]. As for the hepatic artery, most bifurcate and branch normally in patients with an RSLT, as in our patient [1,8].
The bile duct system frequently does not bifurcate normally in patients with RSLT. Nishitai et al. classified the biliary architecture in such patients into four types: the symmetrical type, in which the right umbilical portion (RUP) is the watershed between the right and left branches of the bile duct; the independent right lateral type, in which the right posterior branch is independent and the right anterior sector branch comes around from the left side of the RUP; and the total left and total right types, in which the entire liver is drained only by the bile duct coming around the RUP from one direction [8]. In their study, half were symmetrical and 28% were the independent right lateral type, as in our patient.
The presence of these vascular and bile duct system abnormalities can lead to unexpected complications [6,8]. In our patient, both the portal vein and the bile duct had a bifurcation type in which the right posterior branch independently diverged; this branch then diverged into the right anterior and left branches. In such cases, caution is required when performing a left lobectomy, including left lateral sectionectomy, because an incision that is too deep or more right-sided than planned may result in injury to the right anterior branch. In addition, the ligamentum teres and the falciform ligament do not represent landmarks for the P2 and P3 origins in patients with LSRT [6]. Furthermore, the misidentification of a developed V8 as MHV may lead to a situation in which a planned left lobectomy must be converted to a left trisectionectomy. These possibilities were all considered in our case. However, the points to keep in mind will vary depending on the particular combination of anatomical anomalies and the type of surgery planned.
Fifteen cases of hepatectomy for malignant tumors in patients with RSLT have been reported in the English literature: thirteen open and two laparoscopic (Table 1) [2,6,7,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Three-dimensional liver anatomy simulation systems using CT images allow a detailed and easy evaluation of tumor location and vasculature. Several reports have shown that such an evaluation is quite useful in RSLT cases characterized by many anatomical abnormalities [6,15,16]. Compared with open surgery, many operations are more difficult when performed laparoscopically because of instrument angle limitations and the inability to directly observe the intraperitoneal cavity. Therefore, a careful preoperative evaluation of tumor location, progression, and anatomy is necessary. With a thorough evaluation and frequent use of ultrasonography during surgery, laparoscopic hepatectomy can be performed safely in many patients.

4. Conclusions

RSLT is frequently associated with abnormalities of the liver vasculature and bile duct system. These abnormalities can lead to complications when performing hepatectomy. With left lobectomy, including left lateral sectionectomy, it is important to avoid injury to the right liver vasculature. Laparoscopic hepatectomy can be performed safely in patients with RSLT, provided that careful surgical planning is conducted using preoperative three-dimensional CT analysis and intraoperative ultrasonography.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.A. and H.Y.; image analysis, Y.A., H.T., M.H., T.Y. and K.I.; data curation, Y.A., H.T., M.H., T.Y. and K.I.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.A. and H.T.; writing—review and editing, Y.A. and H.Y.; visualization, Y.A.; supervision, H.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Publication of case reports that do not contain personally identifiable information does not require the approval of our Institutional Review Board.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The original data presented in the study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to [email protected].

Acknowledgments

We thank Liwen Bianji (Edanz) for editing the language of a draft of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shindoh, J.; Akahane, M.; Satou, S.; Aoki, T.; Beck, Y.; Hasegawa, K.; Sugawara, Y.; Ohtomo, K.; Kokudo, N. Vascular architecture in anomalous right-sided ligamentum teres: Three-dimensional analyses in 35 patients. HPB 2012, 14, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nagai, M.; Kubota, K.; Kawasaki, S.; Takayama, T.; Bandai, Y.; Makuuchi, M. Are left-sided gallbladders really located on the left side? Ann. Surg. 1997, 225, 274–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Maetani, Y.; Itoh, K.; Kojima, N.; Tabuchi, T.; Shibata, T.; Asonuma, K.; Tanaka, K.; Konishi, J. Portal vein anomaly associated with deviation of the ligamentum teres to the right and malposition of the gallbladder. Radiology 1998, 207, 723–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Saafan, T.; Hu, J.Y.; Mahfouz, A.E.; Abdelaal, A. True left-sided gallbladder: A case report and comparison with the literature for the different techniques of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for such anomalies. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2018, 42, 280–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Terasaki, F.; Yamamoto, Y.; Sugiura, T.; Okamura, Y.; Ito, T.; Ashida, R.; Ohgi, K.; Aramaki, T.; Uesaka, K. Analysis of right-sided ligamentum teres: The novel anatomical findings and classification. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci. 2021, 28, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Terasaki, F.; Yamamoto, Y.; Ohgi, K.; Sugiura, T.; Okamura, Y.; Ito, T.; Ashida, R.; Uesaka, K. Laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy for a patient with right-sided ligamentum teres. Surg. Case Rep. 2019, 5, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Terasaki, F.; Yamamoto, Y.; Sugiura, T.; Okamura, Y.; Ito, T.; Ashida, R.; Ohgi, K.; Akamoto, S.; Uesaka, K. A case of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma with bilateral ligamentum teres hepatis treated with hepatopancreatoduodenectomy. Surg. Case Rep. 2020, 6, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Nishitai, R.; Shindoh, J.; Yamaoka, T.; Akahane, M.; Kokudo, N.; Manaka, D. Biliary architecture of livers exhibiting right-sided ligamentum teres: An indication for preoperative cholangiography prior to major hepatectomy. HPB 2016, 18, 929–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Uesaka, K.; Yasui, K.; Morimoto, T.; Torii, A.; Kodera, Y.; Hirai, T.; Yamamura, Y.; Kato, T.; Kito, T. Left-Sided gallbladder with intrahepatic portal venous anomalies. J. Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat. Surg. 1995, 2, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kaneoka, Y.; Yamaguchi, A.; Isogai, M.; Harada, T. Hepatectomy for cholangiocarcinoma complicated with right umbilical portion: Anomalous configuration of the intrahepatic biliary tree. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Surg. 2000, 7, 321–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tashiro, H.; Itamoto, T.; Nakahara, H.; Ohdan, H.; Kobayashi, T.; Asahara, T. Resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in a patient with congenital anomaly of the portal system. Dig. Surg. 2003, 20, 163–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sakaguchi, T.; Suzuki, S.; Morita, Y.; Oishi, K.; Suzuki, A.; Fukumoto, K.; Inaba, K.; Takehara, Y.; Baba, S.; Nakamura, S.; et al. Hepatectomy for metastatic liver tumors complicated with right umbilical portion. Hepatogastroenterology 2011, 58, 984–987. [Google Scholar]
  13. Abe, T.; Kajiyama, K.; Harimoto, N.; Gion, T.; Shirabe, K.; Nagaie, T. Resection of metastatic liver cancer in a patient with a left-sided gallbladder and intrahepatic portal vein and bile duct anomalies: A case report. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2012, 3, 147–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Almodhaiberi, H.; Hwang, S.; Cho, Y.J.; Kwon, Y.; Jung, B.H.; Kim, M.H. Customized left-sided hepatectomy and bile duct resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in a patient with left-sided gallbladder and multiple combined anomalies. Korean J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Surg. 2015, 19, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ome, Y.; Kawamoto, K.; Park, T.B.; Ito, T. Major hepatectomy using the glissonean approach in cases of right umbilical portion. World J. Hepatol. 2016, 8, 1535–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hai, S.; Hatano, E.; Hirano, T.; Asano, Y.; Suzumura, K.; Sueoka, H.; Fujimoto, J. Hepatectomy for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma with Right-Sided Ligamentum Teres Using a Hepatectomy Simulation System. Case Rep. Gastroenterol. 2017, 11, 576–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Goto, T.; Terajima, H.; Yamamoto, T.; Uchida, Y. Hepatectomy for gallbladder-cancer with unclassified anomaly of right-sided ligamentum teres: A case report and review of the literature. World J. Hepatol. 2018, 10, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (A) Computed tomography showing a 2.4 × 2.0 cm hypodense mass in the left liver. In arterial (B), portal (C), and delayed (D) phase contrast-enhanced images, the mass exhibited early arterial enhancement and washout. The arrows indicate the location of the tumor in each phase.
Figure 1. (A) Computed tomography showing a 2.4 × 2.0 cm hypodense mass in the left liver. In arterial (B), portal (C), and delayed (D) phase contrast-enhanced images, the mass exhibited early arterial enhancement and washout. The arrows indicate the location of the tumor in each phase.
Diagnostics 13 02529 g001
Figure 2. Axial (A,A’) and coronal (B) contrast-enhanced computed tomography demonstrated that the ligamentum teres (arrowhead) was connected to the right anterior (RA) branch of the portal vein (PV) and the gallbladder (GB) was located to its left, indicating right-sided ligamentum teres.
Figure 2. Axial (A,A’) and coronal (B) contrast-enhanced computed tomography demonstrated that the ligamentum teres (arrowhead) was connected to the right anterior (RA) branch of the portal vein (PV) and the gallbladder (GB) was located to its left, indicating right-sided ligamentum teres.
Diagnostics 13 02529 g002
Figure 3. Magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid contrast agent revealed a mass that exhibited low signal intensity in T1-weighted images (A) and high signal intensity in T2-weighted (B) and diffusion-weighted images (C). Contrasted images showed a perfusion defect in the mass in the liver phase (D). The arrows indicate the location of the tumor in each condition.
Figure 3. Magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid contrast agent revealed a mass that exhibited low signal intensity in T1-weighted images (A) and high signal intensity in T2-weighted (B) and diffusion-weighted images (C). Contrasted images showed a perfusion defect in the mass in the liver phase (D). The arrows indicate the location of the tumor in each condition.
Diagnostics 13 02529 g003
Figure 4. Three-dimensional computed tomography. The tumor (2.4 × 2.0 cm) was in the left lobe of the liver (segment 2/3/4b). The portal vein had a right posterior branch (PRP), right anterior branch (PRA), and left branch. The PRP branched independently. The left branch branched into a lateral superior branch (P2) and a lateral inferior branch (P3) after two medial branches (P4a,b) separated. The PRA was connected to the right umbilical portion (RUP). A right inferior hepatic vein (IRHV) and a hepatic vein branch of an anterior superior segment (V8) were present. The middle hepatic vein (MHV) and left hepatic vein (LHV) were normal. The planned resection line is indicated by the yellow dotted line.
Figure 4. Three-dimensional computed tomography. The tumor (2.4 × 2.0 cm) was in the left lobe of the liver (segment 2/3/4b). The portal vein had a right posterior branch (PRP), right anterior branch (PRA), and left branch. The PRP branched independently. The left branch branched into a lateral superior branch (P2) and a lateral inferior branch (P3) after two medial branches (P4a,b) separated. The PRA was connected to the right umbilical portion (RUP). A right inferior hepatic vein (IRHV) and a hepatic vein branch of an anterior superior segment (V8) were present. The middle hepatic vein (MHV) and left hepatic vein (LHV) were normal. The planned resection line is indicated by the yellow dotted line.
Diagnostics 13 02529 g004
Figure 5. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography revealed that the bile duct system was trifurcated into right posterior (RP), right anterior (RA), and left branches. GB indicates the gallbladder.
Figure 5. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography revealed that the bile duct system was trifurcated into right posterior (RP), right anterior (RA), and left branches. GB indicates the gallbladder.
Diagnostics 13 02529 g005
Figure 6. Intraoperative photography. (A) The ligamentum teres was positioned on the right and the gallbladder is on the left. (B) After the locations of the tumor and middle hepatic vein (MHV) were confirmed using ultrasonography, the resection line was planned to avoid damaging the MHV. The hepatic attachments of the falciform ligament (black arrowhead) were located more to the right than normal. P4a and P4b indicate the medial inferior and medial superior branches of the portal vein, respectively. (C) The planned resection line on the undersurface of the liver was marked. (D,E) The extent and depth of resection (white arrowhead) were confirmed using ultrasonography. The medial inferior (G4a) and medial superior branches of Glisson (G4b) were clipped and cut. (F) Resection of the liver parenchyma advanced in a left dorsal direction, clipping and cutting the lateral superior (G2) and lateral inferior branches of Glisson (G3) and the left hepatic vein (LHV). Finally, the left lateral section, including the partial left median section, was resected.
Figure 6. Intraoperative photography. (A) The ligamentum teres was positioned on the right and the gallbladder is on the left. (B) After the locations of the tumor and middle hepatic vein (MHV) were confirmed using ultrasonography, the resection line was planned to avoid damaging the MHV. The hepatic attachments of the falciform ligament (black arrowhead) were located more to the right than normal. P4a and P4b indicate the medial inferior and medial superior branches of the portal vein, respectively. (C) The planned resection line on the undersurface of the liver was marked. (D,E) The extent and depth of resection (white arrowhead) were confirmed using ultrasonography. The medial inferior (G4a) and medial superior branches of Glisson (G4b) were clipped and cut. (F) Resection of the liver parenchyma advanced in a left dorsal direction, clipping and cutting the lateral superior (G2) and lateral inferior branches of Glisson (G3) and the left hepatic vein (LHV). Finally, the left lateral section, including the partial left median section, was resected.
Diagnostics 13 02529 g006
Table 1. Previously reported cases of hepatectomy for malignant tumors in patients with right-sided ligamentum teres.
Table 1. Previously reported cases of hepatectomy for malignant tumors in patients with right-sided ligamentum teres.
NoAuthorYearAgeSexDiseaseOperationOpen/LapComplicationPortal Vein Branching Type
1Uesaka et al. [9]199553MLiver metastasis of CCRight hemihepatectomyOpen-Independent right lateral
2Nagai et al. [2]199767MHCCSegmentectomy 8, and partial resection of segment 1Open-Independent right lateral
3Nagai et al. [2] 67MHilar CCHPDOpen-Independent right lateral
4Kaneoka et al. [10]200053MHilar CCExtended left hemihepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resectionOpen-Independent right lateral
5Kaneoka et al. [10] 61MExtrahepatic CCHPDOpen-Independent right lateral
6Tashiro et al. [11]200353MHCCPartial hepatectomyOpen-Independent right lateral
7Sakaguchi et al. [12]201176MCRLMExtended right posterior sectionectomyOpen-Independent right lateral
8Abe et al. [13]201270FCRLMRight hemihepatectomyOpen-Bifurcation
9Almodhaiberi et al. [14]201567MHilar CCExtended left lateral sectionectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resectionOpen-Trifurcation
10Ome et al. [15]201670MICCRight anterior sectionectomyOpen-Trifurcation
11Ome et al. [15] 70FHilar CCLeft trisectionectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resectionOpen-Trifurcation
12Hai et al. [16]201778MHilar CCExtended left hemihepatectomyOpenBile leakageIndependent right lateral
13Goto et al. [17]201870sMGCRight hemihepatectomyOpen-other
14Terasaki et al. [6]201963MCRLMLeft lateral sectionectomyLap-Bifurcation
15Terasaki et al. [8]202072MHilar CCHDPOpen-Bilateral
16Our case202169MHCCExtended left lateral sectionectomyLap-Independent right lateral
RSLT, right-sided ligamentum teres; CC, cholangiocarcinoma; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; CRLM, colorectal liver metastasis; HPD, hepatopancreatoduodenectomy; Lap, laparoscopic surgery; Open, laparotomy.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Adachi, Y.; Takahashi, H.; Yamamoto, T.; Hagiwara, M.; Imai, K.; Yokoo, H. Laparoscopic Extended Left Lateral Sectionectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Patient with Right-Sided Ligamentum Teres: A Case Report and Literature Review. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 2529. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13152529

AMA Style

Adachi Y, Takahashi H, Yamamoto T, Hagiwara M, Imai K, Yokoo H. Laparoscopic Extended Left Lateral Sectionectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Patient with Right-Sided Ligamentum Teres: A Case Report and Literature Review. Diagnostics. 2023; 13(15):2529. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13152529

Chicago/Turabian Style

Adachi, Yuki, Hiroyuki Takahashi, Tomohiro Yamamoto, Masahiro Hagiwara, Koji Imai, and Hideki Yokoo. 2023. "Laparoscopic Extended Left Lateral Sectionectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Patient with Right-Sided Ligamentum Teres: A Case Report and Literature Review" Diagnostics 13, no. 15: 2529. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13152529

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop