Next Article in Journal
Fusion of Graph and Tabular Deep Learning Models for Predicting Chronic Kidney Disease
Next Article in Special Issue
The Usefulness of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Management of Acute Phlegmonous Esophagitis
Previous Article in Journal
Role of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) in Patients with Mycosis Fungoides
Previous Article in Special Issue
Acute Ileal Diverticulitis: Computed Tomography and Ultrasound Findings
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 13
Issue 11
10.3390/diagnostics13111980
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Retrospective Cohort Study of Shear-Wave Elastography and Computed Tomography Enterography in Crohn’s Disease

by
Minping Zhang
1,2,
Enhua Xiao
1,*,
Minghui Liu
2,
Xilong Mei
1 and
Yinghuan Dai
3
1
Department of Radiology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410011, China
2
Department of Ultrasound Diagnosis, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410011, China
3
Department of Pathology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410011, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2023, 13(11), 1980; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13111980
Submission received: 12 April 2023 / Revised: 24 May 2023 / Accepted: 29 May 2023 / Published: 5 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnostic Imaging in Gastrointestinal Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Distinguishing between inflammatory and fibrotic lesions drastically influences treatment decision-making regarding Crohn’s disease. However, it is challenging to distinguish these two phenotypes before surgery. This study investigates the diagnostic yield of shear-wave elastography and computed tomography enterography to distinguish intestinal phenotypes in Crohn’s disease. Thirty-seven patients (mean age, 29.51 ± 11.52; 31 men) were evaluated with average value of shear-wave elastography (Emean) and computed tomography enterography (CTE) scores. The results demonstrated that a positive correlation between the Emean and fibrosis (Spearman’s r = 0.653, p = 0.000). The cut-off value for fibrotic lesions was 21.30 KPa (AUC: 0.877, sensitivity: 88.90%, specificity: 89.50%, 95% CI:0.755~0.999, p = 0.000). The CTE score showed a positive correlation with inflammation (Spearman’s r = 0.479, p = 0.003), and a 4.5-point grading system was the optimal cut-off value for inflammatory lesions (AUC: 0.766, sensitivity: 73.70%, specificity: 77.80%, 95% CI: 0.596~0.936, p = 0.006). Combining these two metrics improved the diagnostic performance and specificity (AUC: 0.918, specificity: 94.70%, 95% CI: 0.806~1.000, p = 0.000). In conclusion, shear-wave elastography can be used to help detect fibrotic lesions and the computed tomography enterography score emerged as a feasible predictor of inflammatory lesions. The combination of these two imaging techniques is proposed to distinguish intestinal predominant phenotypes.

1. Introduction

Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder that has shown an increasing incidence and prevalence [1,2]. The characteristic transmural inflammation of CD can result in an inflammatory or fibrostenotic phenotype. The assessments of intestinal phenotypes have become a key point in CD patient management. Anti-inflammatory drugs are effective in patients with inflammatory bowel walls [3]. However, effective targeted drugs have not been developed for fibrosis [4]; therefore, endoscopic dilation therapy, or surgical resection are reasonable treatment options [5,6]. Currently, a method of distinguishing inflammation from fibrosis before surgery has not been developed.
In recent years, new cross-sectional imaging techniques that study CD have evolved, and have high accuracy [7]. Ultrasound imaging and computed tomography (CT) have high sensitivity and specificity in the identification of small bowel and colon lesions [8]. Histopathological assessments of inflammation and fibrosis in surgically resected specimens have been performed to validate noninvasive imaging modalities [9]. Research has shown that these two imaging techniques may help distinguish between inflammatory and fibrotic intestines [10]. Ultrasound imaging, a noninvasive method for intestinal lesions, is recommended to be used to detect CD at its first presentation, and to assess CD location, activity and possible complications [11]. A novel ultrasonic imaging technology called shear-wave elastography (SWE) has also evolved. SWE can quantitatively analyze tissue stiffness by measuring shear wave velocity [12]. This technology expands the application of ultrasound to distinguish CD intestinal wall phenotypes, especially real-time two-dimensional shear wave ultrasound elastography (2D-SWE). Compared with traditional strain elastography, 2D-SWE has a lower operational dependence, higher repeatability and relatively objective results [13,14]. Several studies on CD in animal models and human specimens demonstrated that SWE can differentiate between inflammatory and fibrotic lesions [15,16,17]. Computed tomography enterography (CTE) is sensitive to the detection of small bowel disease in CD, and is comparable to magnetic resonance enterography [18]. The studies have found an association between CT findings and inflammatory lesions, including bowel wall thickening, mural hyperenhancement, and comb signs [19,20]. The American College of Radiology has used CTE as an important method for the diagnosis of CD [21]. Several CTE scoring systems have been proposed to study inflammation [22].
The ability of shear-wave elastography and of CT enterography to detect inflammation and fibrosis have not been determined. Moreover, the prior studies have been limited to one of the independent technologies in differentiating intestinal phenotypes. The present study was designed to investigate the diagnostic yield and accuracy of CTE and SWE separately, and the combination of these two techniques, in differentiating inflammatory lesions from fibrotic lesions in CD.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

We reviewed the radiology and ultrasonic image and electronic medical records for patients with CD from our institution between January 2016 and October 2021. The inclusion criteria were as follows: age > 17 years; terminal ileum lesions; no previous intestinal surgery; and patients who underwent both SWE and CTE examinations within 3 months before surgical resection. The exclusion criteria were as follows: SWE technical failure; and inconsistent segmental positioning of the intestine on ultrasonography, CT and pathology. Figure 1 shows the flow of patients through the study. Of the 114 CD patients with clinical characteristics who underwent bowel surgery, 38 patients underwent both CTE and SWE examinations before surgery. One patient was excluded due to SWE technique failure. The baseline characteristics of the 37 patients with CD are shown in Table 1. Surgical indications included 22 cases of complete intestinal obstruction, 8 cases of fistula and/or abscess formation, and 7 cases of perforation. A histopathologic review of the resected intestines identified 19 inflammatory and 18 fibrotic segments that were finally included for analysis. The number of cases of abscess, fistula, or perforation was greater in inflammatory lesions (inflammation vs fibrosis: 52.63% vs. 28%), and obstruction was more common in fibrotic lesions (inflammation vs fibrosis: 47.00% vs. 72.72%).

2.2. Traditional Intestinal Ultrasound and 2D-SWE Imaging

All transabdominal ultrasounds were performed by ultrasonographers who had more than 10 years of experience in bowel ultrasound. Patients were asked to fast for a period of at least 8 h before the ultrasound examinations, which were performed using an Aixplorer US system (SuperSonic Imagine, Aix-en-Provence, France). A convex broadband probe SC6-1 (3.5~5.5 MHz) was used to observe the whole intestine and locate the lesion. A linear array probe SL15-4 (4~15 MHz) was then used to evaluate the bowel wall thickness and blood flow patterns. Limberg grading [23] of bowel vascularization in the lesions was recorded by color doppler imaging: grade I, bowel wall thickening (>3 mm) without vascularization; grade II, bowel wall thickening with spot vascular signals; grade III, bowel wall thickening with longer vascular signals; and grade IV, bowel wall thickening with longer vascular signals extending from the mesentery. In the longitudinal section of intestinal segments, the probe was fixed in position and then switched to SWE mode, with Young’s modulus set in kPa. In addition, the patients were required to breath hold for 3~5 s. After the elastogram was uniform and stable, the frame was fixed and stored. The Q-box region of interest was placed in the elastogram to measure Emean (the average values of SWE) with 3 times, and averaged values were used for final data analysis.

2.3. CT Enterographic Techniques

Patients were asked to fast for a period of at least 8 h before the CT scan. Intestinal cleansing was performed by oral administration of a 1500 mL compound polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder solution (Wang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China) four hours prior to the scan. One hour prior to the scan, 2000 mL of 2.5% isotonic mannitol (administered in 4 doses of 500 mL/time) was given orally to maintain the filled state of the small intestine [24]. After the third 500 mL dose (30 min before the scan), the patient was administered an intramuscular injection of anisodamine 10 mg to promote and maintain gastrointestinal muscle relaxation. The remaining 500 mL was administered before examination. CT scanning ranged from the top of the diaphragm to the pubic symphysis using dual-source CT (Siemens Somatom Force system, Erlangen, Germany). One hundred milliliters of nonionic contrast agent was injected intravenously at 4 mL/s (Lopamiro370, Bracco S.P. A, Shanghai, China), and 50 mL of normal saline was added at the same flow rate to obtain enhanced CT images. By adopting advanced modeled iterative reconstruction, the fast double energy method was used to reconstruct 5 mm layer thicknesses, and a layer spacing of 5 mm was used for daily imaging of abdominal window images. Reconstruction of a 1~1.5 mm window and incremental reconstruction of a 0.7~1 mm thin abdominal soft tissue window were performed and delivered to the workstation. Coronal and sagittal images were reconstructed on the workstation to display the lesion and its surrounding tissues in multiple directions. Radiologists with more than 10 years of experience in abdominal CT who were blinded to both the clinical history and the pathologic findings retrospectively reviewed all CT scans. The CTE findings that were scored included mural hyperenhancement, bowel wall thickening (>3 mm), comb sign, perienteric fat stranding, upstream dilation (small bowel ≥ 30 mm, colon > 60 mm), and lymphadenopathy (short-axis diameter >15 mm) (Figure 2) [25]. Each of these CTE findings was scored 0 or 1. The total CTE scoring was the accumulation of each score (range: 0~6).

2.4. Histological Evaluation

The surgical specimens were examined and processed in a standard routine clinical protocol, including tissue fixation in formalin and paraffin-embedded intestinal tissues. Hematoxylin and eosin [H and E]-stained sections were selected for the histological analysis. For each layer of the bowel wall, the possibility of histological abnormalities was assessed individually by a pathologist who was blinded to the results of other examinations. The assessment of inflammation included neutrophil infiltrate, cryptitis, crypt abscess, erosion, and ulcer, while that of fibrosis included hyperplasia of fibrous tissue and hypertrophic nerves [10,26,27]. In the present study, the basic criterion for determining inflammatory segments was inflammation without fibrosis in any layer. Fibrotic segments were defined as pronounced areas of submucosal fibrosis or hypertrophic nerves.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was applied to test for a normal distribution. For a normal distribution, continuous variables were presented as the mean ± SD and T tests were used. For nonnormal distributions, the Mann–Whitney U test was used. Categorical variables were tested by the chi-square test. The Spearman product moment correlation coefficient was used to determine the relationship between the CTE score or Emean and intestinal wall phenotypes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the diagnostic yield, sensitivity, and specificity of the CTE score, Emean, and the combination of these two metrics to distinguish intestinal phenotypes in CD. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS 19.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The results were considered significant at a p value less than 0.05. Graphing was performed using GraphPad Prism 6.0. The statistical review of the study was performed by a biomedical statistician.

3. Results

3.1. Conventional Ultrasound and Two-Dimensional Shear-Wave Elastography (2D-SWE)

Increased bowel wall thickening at multiple segments with a maximum thickness ranging 4.00~21.00 mm and an average thickness of 9.80 ± 3.91 mm was observed. The study also compared the Doppler US of mesenteric blood flow. The analysis of the data revealed no difference in intestinal wall thickness or Limberg grading between the inflammatory and fibrotic bowel segments (p > 0.05). However, the Emean was notably higher for fibrotic bowel segments than inflammatory segments (p < 0.05) (Figure 3, Table 2). A positive correlation was observed between the Emean and fibrosis (Spearman’s r = 0.653, p = 0.000). To assess the role of the Emean in distinguishing inflammatory from fibrotic segments, pathological tissue was used as the gold standard. The results indicated that Emean > 21.3 kPa could be used for fibrotic lesions. The sensitivity and specificity were 88.90% and 89.50%, respectively, with an AUC of 0.877 (95% CI: 0.755~0.999, p = 0.000).

3.2. CTE Findings and Diagnostic Yield of CD Phenotypes

The single most striking observations to emerge from the CT findings comparison were comb signs and perienteric fat stranding between the inflammatory and fibrotic bowel segments (p < 0.05) (Table 2, Figure 4). Moreover, the CTE score was calculated based on careful evaluation of the CTE findings in each bowel segment. The CTE score was notably higher for inflammatory segments versus fibrotic bowel segments (Table 2). A positive correlation was observed between the CTE score and pathology findings with regard to inflammation (Spearman’s r = 0.479, p = 0.003). Furthermore, an ROC curve was generated to assess the role of the CTE score in CD. Using a 4.5-point grading system for inflammatory lesions, the sensitivity and specificity of the CTE score were 73.70% and 77.80%, respectively, with an AUC of 0.766 (95% CI: 0.596~0.936, p = 0.006).

3.3. CTE Combined with 2D-SWE to Distinguish between Inflammatory and Fibrotic Lesions

Based on the predictor identified in this study for inflammatory and fibrotic lesions of CD, the yield and accuracy of the combination of CTE score and Emean in distinguishing inflammation from fibrotic lesions were determined. Interestingly, when these two metrics were combined to discriminate between inflammation and fibrotic lesions, the sensitivity and specificity were 83.30% and 94.70%, respectively, with an AUC of 0.918 (95% CI: 0.806~1.000, p = 0.000) (Figure 5).

4. Discussion

The distinction between inflammation and fibrotic lesions drastically influences treatment decision-making regarding Crohn’s disease. Patients with prominent inflammation can potentially be managed with medical agents and biological therapies, whereas patients with prevalent fibrosis, in particular if associated with obstructive symptoms, frequently require endoscopic balloon dilatation or surgery [3,28,29]. However, both types had been resected in this study. It is hoped that this differentiation will be valuable in the clinical field, highlighting the need for an accurate and noninvasive method of characterizing intestinal phenotypes before surgery. Cross-sectional imaging techniques such as shear-wave elastography and CT enterography are suited for this task. In this present study, the two methods were both used in the assessment, and their diagnostic accuracies were compared. The average values of the SWE (Emean) and CT enterography scores showed excellent diagnostic yield for fibrotic or inflammatory lesions, respectively. Although the sensitivity of the combination of these two metrics tended to be lower than that of the Emean, the specificity was outstanding in differentiating intestinal phenotypes in Crohn’s disease.
To distinguish intestinal inflammation and fibrotic lesions, the direct detection of intestinal wall tissue should be the most intuitive and reliable method. 2D-SWE provides a real-time elastogram of the inflammation and fibrous intestinal segment regions, and can perform quantitative detection of intestinal wall stiffness. The Emean were higher for fibrous bowel segments versus inflammatory segments, which is consistent with previous studies [15,30]. Mesenchymal cells, such as fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, and smooth muscle cells, increase in fibrotic intestinal segments, resulting in the accumulation of a collagen-rich extracellular matrix [31]. The extracellular matrix is a storage site for fibrotic growth factors [32,33], which can be released to promote the deposition and cross-linking of extracellular matrix components, thereby changing the local mechanical properties and increasing the stiffness [34]. In addition, the contraction of mesenchymal cells can further increase stiffness, independent of inflammation [35]. In clinical practice, intestinal wall fibrosis is a serious issue. Among the predictors for fibrosis intestinal segments, the Emean value was prominent. These findings demonstrate the reliability of the SWE technique in assessing intestinal wall fibrosis, but not inflammatory lesions [36]. Regarding the reference value of fibrosis, liver ultrasound elasticity guidelines recommend using the mean value for liver stiffness assessments [14]. This value was also applied in our study. The present study revealed that using 21.30 KPa as the cutoff value could discriminate between inflammation and fibrosis, and showed excellent sensitivity. Although the specificity tended to be lower than that of prior studies that used 22.55 kPa to discriminate between mild/moderate and severe fibrosis [16], this difference was not significant (89.5% vs. 91.7%). Notably, this study only distinguished between inflammation and fibrotic lesions and did not grade the severity of fibrosis. Therefore, regarding the accuracy of the threshold, a larger sample should be included and further study is warranted in the future. CTE is a novel and potentially useful radiological technique for evaluating the intestine in CD, and has a high accuracy in detecting active inflammation [37]. A previous study showed that CTE may reliably differentiate between inflammatory and fibrotic lesions in patients with CD [26]. In addition, several CTE variables were associated with the pathological findings of inflammation, including mucosal enhancement, comb signs, and perienteric fat stranding can predict tissue inflammation [27]. A prior study noted the importance of perienteric fat in the pathogenesis of inflammatory and fibrotic lesions in CD [38]. Indeed, in the present study, the comb sign was prominent in inflammatory bowel segments, but only 22.22% in fibrotic bowel segments. Perienteric fat stranding was also found to be associated with characteristics of the intestinal wall phenotype. When the bowel is in active inflammation, a series of inflammatory reactions may occur around the diseased bowel. Intestinal ulcers associated with CD are primarily located at the mesenteric margin, and increased TNF-α production by fat cells in mesenteric fat may contribute to transmural inflammation [38]. To some extent, CTE reflects the histopathological state of CD inflammation. However, in this study, mural hyperenhancement was found in all intestinal segments. In fact, pure fibrotic lesions in CD are rare, and inflammation and fibrosis often coexist [27]. The establishment of the CTE scoring system provides an objective tool for disease assessment [39]. The CTE score represents an accumulation of intestinal CT findings. The present study implies that the CTE score represents a reliable predictor of inflammatory lesions, but has little predictive value for tissue fibrosis lesions, which confirms the view of a previous study [27]. For a threshold of predicting inflammatory lesions of 4.5 points, the sensitivity and specificity was 73.70% and 77.80%, respectively. However, a prior study indicated that a threshold of 3.5 points has a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 86% for active inflammation [40]. The difference between the results is related to the CT findings and the number of reference indicators included in the CTE scoring system. In the present study, the total score range was 0 to 6, while that in the previous study was 0 to 5. Prestenotic dilation and lymphadenopathy were included in the study, while fat in the layers of the bowel wall was absent. The other four CTE findings were the same. Therefore, the application scoring value varies with the scoring system. Our study revealed the role of SWE in detecting fibrotic bowel segments and CTE in evaluating CD inflammatory lesions, and investigated the combination of the two imaging techniques. Interestingly, a finding to emerge from this study is that the combination of SWE with CTE contributed to a better diagnostic performance in distinguishing inflammation from fibrotic lesions, and the specificity was significantly improved. Although SWE and CTE have their own shortcomings, by combining the two technologies to assess the intestinal wall phenotypes of CD, they can compensate for each other’s shortcomings, and the advantages are more prominent.
This study had several potential limitations. This makes intuitive sense given that blood flow correlates with active inflammation. Despite the fact that there is a combination of active inflammation and fibrotic lesions in the intestine, we expect to be able to better distinguish which phenotype is predominant in intestinal lesions. The comprehensive assessment of CTE and SWE is more suitable for this task, and contributes to optimizing care for patients with CD. In addition, there is a selection bias. Patients who had resection and two types of imaging were retrospectively selected. These are preliminary results from a small study, so larger prospective studies are needed for verification. Finally, the same morphologic changes also vary by different imaging techniques, and challenges remain regarding differentiating inflammation and fibrosis.

5. Conclusions

Shear-wave elastography helps detect intestinal fibrosis lesions, and the CT enterography score represents a feasible and accurate predictor of inflammatory lesions in Crohn’s disease. Moreover, combining shear-wave elastography and the CT enterography score can more reliably differentiate intestinal predominant phenotypes in Crohn’s disease. Either technique or a combination of one with intestinal ultrasound is important. Further validation on a wide-scale population is needed.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.X. and M.Z.; Methodology, M.Z., M.L. and X.M.; Software, M.Z., X.M. and Y.D.; Validation, E.X., X.M. and M.L.; Formal Analysis, Resources and Supervision, E.X. and M.L.; Investigation and Data Curation, M.Z., M.L. and Y.D.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, M.Z.; Writing—Review and Editing, All authors; Project Administration, E.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (Approved Number, 2021044, Approval date 3 November 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived due to the following reasons. In this retrospective study, medical records obtained from previous clinical treatment were used, which met the minimum risk standard, and patients could not be contacted, so informed consent was not feasible. All relevant information of the subjects will be removed from the identification, without revealing their privacy, and the exemption of informed consent will not adversely affect the rights and health of the subjects. In addition, both the research site and the researchers complied with the Measures for Ethical Review of Biomedical Research Involving Humans issued by the National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People’s Republic of China in 2016, and the study did not increase the risk of the subjects, so the Institutional Review Board of the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University waived informed consent.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the doctors of gastroenterology and general surgery in our institution for their contributions to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ng, S.C.; Shi, H.Y.; Hamidi, N.; Underwood, F.E.; Tang, W.; Benchimol, E.I.; Panaccione, R.; Ghosh, S.; Wu, J.C.Y.; Chan, F.K.L.; et al. Worldwide incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease in the 21st century: A systematic review of population-based studies. Lancet 2017, 390, 2769–2778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gajendran, M.; Loganathan, P.; Catinella, A.P.; Hashash, J.G. A comprehensive review and update on Crohn’s disease. Dis. Mon. 2018, 64, 20–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Torres, J.; Bonovas, S.; Doherty, G.; Kucharzik, T.; Gisbert, J.P.; Raine, T.; Adamina, M.; Armuzzi, A.; Bachmann, O.; Bager, P.; et al. ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Crohn’s Disease: Medical Treatment. J. Crohns Colitis 2020, 14, 4–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Rieder, F.; Bettenworth, D.; Ma, C.; Parker, C.E.; Williamson, L.A.; Nelson, S.A.; van Assche, G.; Di Sabatino, A.; Bouhnik, Y.; Stidham, R.W.; et al. An expert consensus to standardise definitions, diagnosis and treatment targets for anti-fibrotic stricture therapies in Crohn’s disease. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2018, 48, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Rieder, F.; Latella, G.; Magro, F.; Yuksel, E.S.; Higgins, P.D.; Di Sabatino, A.; de Bruyn, J.R.; Rimola, J.; Brito, J.; Bettenworth, D.; et al. European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation Topical Review on Prediction, Diagnosis and Management of Fibrostenosing Crohn’s Disease. J. Crohns Colitis 2016, 10, 873–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Bruining, D.H.; Zimmermann, E.M.; Loftus, E.V., Jr.; Sandborn, W.J.; Sauer, C.G.; Strong, S.A. Consensus Recommendations for Evaluation, Interpretation, and Utilization of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Enterography in Patients with Small Bowel Crohn’s Disease. Gastroenterology 2018, 154, 1172–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Panés, J.; Bouzas, R.; Chaparro, M.; García-Sánchez, V.; Gisbert, J.P.; Martínez de Guereñu, B.; Mendoza, J.L.; Paredes, J.M.; Quiroga, S.; Ripollés, T.; et al. Systematic review: The use of ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis, assessment of activity and abdominal complications of Crohn’s disease. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2011, 34, 125–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bettenworth, D.; Bokemeyer, A.; Baker, M.; Mao, R.; Parker, C.E.; Nguyen, T.; Ma, C.; Panés, J.; Rimola, J.; Fletcher, J.G.; et al. Stenosis Therapy and Anti-Fibrotic Research (STAR) Consortium. Assessment of Crohn’sdisease-associated small bowel strictures and fibrosis on cross-sectional imaging: A systematic review. Gut 2019, 68, 1115–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Gordon, I.O.; Bettenworth, D.; Bokemeyer, A.; Srivastava, A.; Rosty, C.; de Hertogh, G.; Robert, M.E.; Valasek, M.A.; Mao, R.; Kurada, S.; et al. Stenosis Therapy and Anti-Fibrotic Research (STAR) Consortium. Histopathology Scoring Systems of Stenosis Associated With Small Bowel Crohn’s Disease: A Systematic Review. Gastroenterology 2020, 158, 137–150.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gomollón, F.; Dignass, A.; Annese, V.; Tilg, H.; Van Assche, G.; Lindsay, J.O.; Peyrin-Biroulet, L.; Cullen, G.J.; Daperno, M.; Kucharzik, T.; et al. ECCO. 3rd European Evidence-based Consensus on the Diagnosis and Management of Crohn’s Disease 2016: Part 1: Diagnosis and Medical Management. J. Crohns Colitis 2017, 11, 3–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Maconi, G.; Nylund, K.; Ripolles, T.; Calabrese, E.; Dirks, K.; Dietrich, C.F.; Hollerweger, A.; Sporea, I.; Saftoiu, A.; Maaser, C.; et al. EFSUMB Recommendations and Clinical Guidelines for Intestinal Ultrasound (GIUS) in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Ultraschall Der Med. 2018, 39, 304–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Bamber, J.; Cosgrove, D.; Dietrich, C.F.; Fromageau, J.; Bojunga, J.; Calliada, F.; Cantisani, V.; Correas, J.M.; D’Onofrio, M.; Drakonaki, E.E.; et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 1: Basic principles and technology. Ultraschall Der Med. 2013, 34, 169–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Cosgrove, D.O.; Berg, W.A.; Doré, C.J.; Skyba, D.M.; Henry, J.P.; Gay, J.; Cohen-Bacrie, C.; BE1 Study Group. Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible. Eur. Radiol. 2012, 22, 1023–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Ferraioli, G.; Wong, V.W.; Castera, L.; Berzigotti, A.; Sporea, I.; Dietrich, C.F.; Choi, B.I.; Wilson, S.R.; Kudo, M.; Barr, R.G. Liver Ultrasound Elastography: An Update to the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology Guidelines and Recommendations. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2018, 44, 2419–2440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Dillman, J.R.; Stidham, R.W.; Higgins, P.D.R.; Moons, D.S.; Johnson, L.A.; Rubin, J.M. US elastography-derived shear wave velocity helps distinguish acutely inflamed from fibrotic bowel in a Crohn disease animal model. Radiology 2013, 267, 757–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Chen, Y.-J.; Mao, R.; Li, X.-H.; Cao, Q.-H.; Chen, Z.-H.; Liu, B.-X.; Chen, S.-L.; Chen, B.-L.; He, Y.; Zeng, Z.-R.; et al. Real-Time Shear Wave Ultrasound Elastography Differentiates Fibrotic from Inflammatory Strictures in Patients with Crohn’s Disease. Inflamm. Bowel. Dis. 2018, 24, 2183–2190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Thimm, M.A.; Cuffari, C.; Garcia, A.; Sidhu, S.; Hwang, M. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Shear Wave Elastography Evaluation of Crohn’s Disease Activity in Three Adolescent Patients. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Nutr. 2019, 22, 282–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. SLichtenstein, G.R.; Loftus, E.V.; Isaacs, K.L.; Regueiro, M.D.; Gerson, L.B.; Sands, B.E. ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Crohn’s Disease in Adults. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2018, 113, 481–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Choi, D.; Lee, S.J.; Cho, Y.A.; Lim, H.K.; Kim, S.H.; Lee, W.J.; Lim, J.H.; Park, H.; Lee, Y.R. Bowel wall thickening in patients with Crohn’s disease: CT patterns and correlation with inflammatory activity. Clin. Radiol. 2003, 58, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Paulsen, S.R.; Huprich, J.E.; Fletcher, J.G.; Booya, F.; Young, B.M.; Fidler, J.L.; Johnson, C.D.; Barlow, J.M.; Earnest, F., 4th. CT enterography as a diagnostic tool in evaluating small bowel disorders: Review of clinical experience with over 700 cases. Radiographics 2006, 26, 641–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal Imaging; Kim, D.H.; Chang, K.J.; Fowler, K.J.; Cash, B.D.; Garcia, E.M.; Kambadakone, A.R.; Levy, A.D.; Liu, P.S.; Mace, S.E.; et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Crohn Disease. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 2020, 17, S81–S99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bruining, D.H.; Bhatnagar, G.; Rimola, J.; Taylor, S.; Zimmermann, E.M.; Fletcher, J.G. CT and MR enterography in Crohn’s disease: Current and future applications. Abdom. Imaging 2015, 40, 965–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Limberg, B. Diagnosis of chronic inflammatory bowel disease by ultrasonography. Z. Gastroenterol. 1999, 37, 495–508. [Google Scholar]
  24. Li, X.; Feng, S.; Huang, L.; Zhou, J.; Zhou, Z.; Huang, S.; Mao, R.; He, Y.; Liu, W.; Xue, H.; et al. Expert guideline on imaging examination and report specification of inflammatory bowel disease in China. Chin. J. Inflamm. Bowel. Dis. 2021, 5, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Guglielmo, F.F.; Anupindi, S.A.; Fletcher, J.G.; Al-Hawary, M.M.; Dillman, J.R.; Grand, D.J.; Bruining, D.H.; Chatterji, M.; Darge, K.; Fidler, J.L.; et al. Small Bowel Crohn Disease at CT and MR Enterography: Imaging Atlas and Glossary of Terms. Radiographics 2020, 40, 354–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chiorean, M.V.; Sandrasegaran, K.; Saxena, R.; Maglinte, D.D.; Nakeeb, A.; Johnson, C.S. Correlation of CT enteroclysis with surgical pathology in Crohn’s disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2007, 102, 2541–2550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Adler, J.; Punglia, D.R.; Dillman, J.R.; Polydorides, A.D.; Dave, M.; Al-Hawary, M.M.; Platt, J.F.; McKenna, B.J.; Zimmermann, E.M. Computed tomography enterography findings correlate with tissue inflammation, not fibrosis in resected small bowel Crohn’s disease. Inflamm. Bowel. Dis. 2012, 18, 849–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Macaluso, F.S.; Papi, C.; Orlando, A.; Festa, S.; Pugliese, D.; Bonovas, S.; Pansieri, C.; Piovani, D.; Fiorino, G.; Fantini, M.C.; et al. Italian Group for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD); Working panel; Review panel. Use of biologics for the management of Crohn’s disease: IG-IBD clinical guidelines based on the GRADE methodology. Dig. Liver Dis. 2023, 55, 442–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Adamina, M.; Bonovas, S.; Raine, T.; Spinelli, A.; Warusavitarne, J.; Armuzzi, A.; Bachmann, O.; Bager, P.; Biancone, L.; Bokemeyer, B.; et al. ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Crohn’s Disease: Surgical Treatment. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2020, 14, 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Lu, C.; Gui, X.; Chen, W.; Fung, T.; Novak, K.; Wilson, S.R. Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography and Contrast Enhancement: Effective Biomarkers in Crohn’s Disease Strictures. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2017, 23, 421–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rieder, F.; Zimmermann, E.M.; Remzi, F.H.; Sandborn, W.J. Crohn’s disease complicated by strictures: A systematic review. Gut 2013, 62, 1072–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Munger, J.S.; Harpel, J.G.; Gleizes, P.E.; Mazzieri, R.; Nunes, I.; Rifkin, D.B. Latent transforming growth factor-beta: Structural features and mechanisms of activation. Kidney Int. 1997, 51, 1376–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Vaday, G.G.; Hershkoviz, R.; Rahat, M.A.; Lahat, N.; Cahalon, L.; Lider, O. Fibronectin-bound TNF-alpha stimulates monocyte matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression and regulates chemotaxis. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2000, 68, 737–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wells, R.G. The role of matrix stiffness in regulating cell behavior. Hepatology 2008, 47, 1394–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ura, H.; Obara, T.; Yokota, K.; Shibata, Y.; Okamura, K.; Namiki, M. Effects Of Transforming Growth-Factor-Beta Relasead From Gastric-Carcinoma Cells On The Contraction Of Collagen-Matrix Gels Containing Fibroblasts. Cancer Res. 1991, 51, 3550–3554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Dillman, J.R.; Stidham, R.W.; Higgins, P.D.; Moons, D.S.; Johnson, L.A.; Keshavarzi, N.R.; Rubin, J.M. Ultrasound shear wave elastography helps discriminate low-grade from high-grade bowel wall fibrosis in ex vivo human intestinal specimens. J. Ultrasound Med. 2014, 33, 2115–2123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Siddiki, H.A.; Fidler, J.L.; Fletcher, J.G.; Burton, S.S.; Huprich, J.E.; Hough, D.M.; Johnson, C.D.; Bruining, D.H.; Loftus, E.V.; Sandborn, W.J.; et al. Prospective comparison of state-of-the-art MR enterography and CT enterography in small-bowel Crohn’s disease. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2009, 193, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Peyrin-Biroulet, L.; Chamaillard, M.; Gonzalez, F.; Beclin, E.; Decourcelle, C.; Antunes, L.; Gay, G.; Neut, C.; Colombel, J.-F.; Desreumaux, P. Mesenteric fat in Crohn’s disease: A pathogenetic hallmark or an innocent bystander? Gut 2007, 56, 577–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Ma, L.; Shen, X.; Chen, Y.J.; Zhang, Q.; Li, B.; Zhang, W. Computed tomography enterography for crohn’s disease: Correlation between the imaging findings and histopathologic scoring system. Abdom. Radiol. 2021, 46, 4121–4129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Higgins; Peter, D.R.; Joel, P.; Paul, S.; Ellen, Z. Inflammation vs. fibrosis: Evaluation of small bowel narrowing in Crohn’s disease with CT enterography. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2003, 98, S241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Diagnostics 13 01980 g001 550
Figure 1. The flow diagram of patients through the study.
Figure 1. The flow diagram of patients through the study.
Diagnostics 13 01980 g001
Diagnostics 13 01980 g002 550
Figure 2. CT enterography findings in Crohn’s disease. (a) A male, 29 years old. Axial CT enterography in a patient with Crohn’s disease shows bowel wall thickening (10.9 mm), mural hyperenhancement and perienteric fat stranding (arrows); (b) Coronal CT image shows the mesenteric straight small vessels are increased, presenting as comb sign. The enlarged mesenteric lymphadenopathy, bowel wall thickening, and mural hyperenhancement also can be clearly seen (arrows); (c) A male, 41 years old. Coronal CT image shows the lesion and upstream dilation (39.7 mm) (arrows).
Figure 2. CT enterography findings in Crohn’s disease. (a) A male, 29 years old. Axial CT enterography in a patient with Crohn’s disease shows bowel wall thickening (10.9 mm), mural hyperenhancement and perienteric fat stranding (arrows); (b) Coronal CT image shows the mesenteric straight small vessels are increased, presenting as comb sign. The enlarged mesenteric lymphadenopathy, bowel wall thickening, and mural hyperenhancement also can be clearly seen (arrows); (c) A male, 41 years old. Coronal CT image shows the lesion and upstream dilation (39.7 mm) (arrows).
Diagnostics 13 01980 g002
Diagnostics 13 01980 g003a 550Diagnostics 13 01980 g003b 550
Figure 3. Real-time shear-wave elastography and histopathology of intestinal wall in patients with CD. (a) A male, 29 years old, Emean = 54.9 Kpa; (b) Haematoxylin and eosin [H and E]-stained sections of the same patient; the histological findings of intestinal wall showed the areas of submucosal fiber hyperplasia were pronounced; (c) A female, 55 years old, Emean = 13.0 Kpa; (d) Haematoxylin and eosin [H and E]-stained sections; the histologically confirmed inflammatory lesion.
Figure 3. Real-time shear-wave elastography and histopathology of intestinal wall in patients with CD. (a) A male, 29 years old, Emean = 54.9 Kpa; (b) Haematoxylin and eosin [H and E]-stained sections of the same patient; the histological findings of intestinal wall showed the areas of submucosal fiber hyperplasia were pronounced; (c) A female, 55 years old, Emean = 13.0 Kpa; (d) Haematoxylin and eosin [H and E]-stained sections; the histologically confirmed inflammatory lesion.
Diagnostics 13 01980 g003aDiagnostics 13 01980 g003b
Diagnostics 13 01980 g004 550
Figure 4. CT enterography findings to differentiate inflammation from fibrotic segments in Crohn’s disease. The observation to emerge from the CT findings showed comb sign and perienteric fat stranding were notably higher for inflammatory segments versus fibrous bowel segments.
Figure 4. CT enterography findings to differentiate inflammation from fibrotic segments in Crohn’s disease. The observation to emerge from the CT findings showed comb sign and perienteric fat stranding were notably higher for inflammatory segments versus fibrous bowel segments.
Diagnostics 13 01980 g004
Diagnostics 13 01980 g005 550
Figure 5. The metrics in discriminating between inflammation and fibrosis lesions. The ROC curve shows the combination of CT enterography score (CTE) and the average value of Shear-wave elastography (Emean) is superior to either one alone in discriminating between inflammation and fibrosis lesions in Crohn’s disease.
Figure 5. The metrics in discriminating between inflammation and fibrosis lesions. The ROC curve shows the combination of CT enterography score (CTE) and the average value of Shear-wave elastography (Emean) is superior to either one alone in discriminating between inflammation and fibrosis lesions in Crohn’s disease.
Diagnostics 13 01980 g005
Table
Table 1. The demographics characteristics in patients with Crohn’s disease.
Table 1. The demographics characteristics in patients with Crohn’s disease.
ParametersValue
Age, Mean (SD), Years29.51 (11.52)
Gender, M/F (n)31/6
Clinical characteristics
Lower abdominal pain37
Diarrhea22
Abdominal mass16
Weight loss11
Fever7
Hematochezia10
White blood cell (109/L)7.89 ± 3.89
Hemoglobin (g/L)109.84 ± 22.25
Platelet (109/L)349.73 ± 122.64
Neutrophil (109/L)6.53 ± 4.00
Lymphocyte (109/L)0.96 ± 0.63
Total protein (g/L)59.16 ± 9.41
Albumin (g/L)31.38 ± 8.58
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (μg/g)33.70 ± 20.62
C-reactive protein (mg/L)53.42 ± 39.10
Table
Table 2. Ultrasound and CTE findings in differentiating intestinal inflammation and fibrosis lesions.
Table 2. Ultrasound and CTE findings in differentiating intestinal inflammation and fibrosis lesions.
InflammationFibrosisp-Value
Bowel wall thickness (mm)9.07 ± 4.1410.53 ± 3.66NS
Limberg grading, n (%) NS
I0 (0.00)1 (5.56)
Ⅱ2 (10.53)8 (44.44)
Ⅲ12 (63.16)7 (38.89)
Ⅳ5 (26.32)2 (11.11)
2D-SWE, Emean, Kpa17.59 ± 7.2135.24 ± 13.310.000 *
CTE findings, n (%)
Bowel wall thickening19 (100.00)18 (100.00)NS
Mural hyperenhancement19 (100.00)18 (100.00)NS
Comb sign11 (57.89)4 (22.22)0.020 *
Lymphadenopathy13 (68.42)12 (66.67)NS
Perienteric fat stranding19 (100)9 (50.00)0.000 *
Upstream dilation11 (57.89)8 (44.44)NS
CTE score4.84 ± 0.773.83 ± 1.150.004 *
2D-SWE: two-dimensional shear wave ultrasound elastography; CTE: computed tomography enterography; *: p < 0.05, significance; NS: p > 0.05, no significance.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, M.; Xiao, E.; Liu, M.; Mei, X.; Dai, Y. Retrospective Cohort Study of Shear-Wave Elastography and Computed Tomography Enterography in Crohn’s Disease. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 1980. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13111980

AMA Style

Zhang M, Xiao E, Liu M, Mei X, Dai Y. Retrospective Cohort Study of Shear-Wave Elastography and Computed Tomography Enterography in Crohn’s Disease. Diagnostics. 2023; 13(11):1980. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13111980

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Minping, Enhua Xiao, Minghui Liu, Xilong Mei, and Yinghuan Dai. 2023. "Retrospective Cohort Study of Shear-Wave Elastography and Computed Tomography Enterography in Crohn’s Disease" Diagnostics 13, no. 11: 1980. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13111980

APA Style

Zhang, M., Xiao, E., Liu, M., Mei, X., & Dai, Y. (2023). Retrospective Cohort Study of Shear-Wave Elastography and Computed Tomography Enterography in Crohn’s Disease. Diagnostics, 13(11), 1980. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13111980

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop