Next Article in Journal
Neutrophile-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) Identifies Patients with Coronavirus Infectious Disease 2019 (COVID-19) at High Risk for Deterioration and Mortality—A Retrospective, Monocentric Cohort Study
Previous Article in Journal
Design of Gold Nanoparticle Vertical Flow Assays for Point-of-Care Testing
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 12
Issue 5
10.3390/diagnostics12051108
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Uremic Pruritus: From Diagnosis to Treatment

by
An-Yu Cheng
and
Lai-San Wong
*
Department of Dermatology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2022, 12(5), 1108; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051108
Submission received: 31 March 2022 / Revised: 22 April 2022 / Accepted: 26 April 2022 / Published: 28 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Uremic pruritus, or chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus, is common, bothersome, and sometimes debilitating in patients with chronic kidney disease or end-stage renal disease. Due to its variable clinical manifestations, the diagnosis of uremic pruritus requires exquisite evaluation. Excluding itch resulting from other dermatological causes as well as other systemic conditions is essential for a proper diagnosis. The pathophysiology of uremic pruritus remains uncertain. Hypotheses including toxin deposition, immune system dysregulation, peripheral neuropathy, and opioid imbalance are supposed. This review summarizes the way to accurately diagnose uremic pruritus and describes the latest treatment options.

1. Introduction

Uremic pruritus, also known as chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP), is a common, bothersome, and sometimes debilitating symptom in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) or end-stage renal disease (ESRD).
One large international cohort study of adult dialysis patients (Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS)) reported that around 70% of hemodialysis patients suffered from pruritus and 40% of them were bothered by at least moderate pruritus. Notably, not only in patients with dialysis, the prevalence of moderate to severe pruritus in non-dialysis CKD patients was around 25% [1]. The prevalence of moderate to severe pruritus decreased from 46% in 1996 to 37% in 2015 [2,3], supposedly associated with the refinement of dialysis adequacy.
Risk factors of uremic pruritus in hemodialysis patients have been reported to be old age, gender, calcium–phosphate imbalance, longer duration of dialysis, and comorbidities such as concurrent cardiovascular disease, congestive cardiac failure, lung disease, liver disease, neurological disease, hepatitis C infection, and anemia [4]. However, some results were inconsistent in different studies [5,6,7,8]. Risk factors of developing pruritus in non-dialysis CKD patients include old age, female sex, advanced stage of CKD, lung disease, diabetes mellitus, and depression [1].
Pruritus in these patients dramatically affects their quality of life. Around half of them were bothered by pruritus all day long, and one-third were most bothered at night. The high percentage of night-time pruritus may lead to sleep disturbance. Sixty percent of patients with severe pruritus also frequently suffered from restless sleep [3]. Patients with pruritus also reported poor quality of life by appearance, mental distress, decreasing desire for social interaction, and ability to work. Notably, the bothersome symptoms not only decrease quality of life but also cause poorer medical outcomes. Pruritus in these patients was associated with significantly higher mortality, with a 13% higher risk in DOPPS phase I (1996–2001), a 21% higher risk in DOPPS phase II (2002–2004), and 37% higher risk in Japanese patients, and was suggested to be related to poor sleep quality [2,9]. One recent study using Taiwan’s national health insurance database revealed a higher risk of all-cause death and long-term morbidities including infection-associated hospitalization and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in patients with uremic pruritus [10,11].
Despite its high prevalence, disease burden, and even higher risk of mortality, pruritus is often underreported by patients and is underestimated by health care providers. Some 69% of medical facilities directors underestimated the prevalence of pruritus in their facilities, and 17% of patients who were frequently bothered by itchiness never reported their symptoms to any member of the medical facility. Among those who did report, they were more likely to report to nephrologists and staff of the dialysis facility, followed by dermatologists [3].
Therefore, raising awareness of uremic pruritus is crucial for both patients and health care providers. Health care providers should also be careful about making an accurate diagnosis in CKD patients with chronic pruritus. At the same time, understanding its pathophysiology to develop proper treatment is essential to improve patients’ quality of life and medical outcomes. In this review, we focus on current advances in diagnosis and treatment to overcome the unmet needs of patients with uremic pruritus.

2. Clinical Features

The clinical manifestations of uremic pruritus are variable. The severity varies from somewhat uncomfortable to extremely disturbing and inducing restlessness. About 20% of patients experienced being very much and extremely itchy in the DOPPS study [3]. The distribution is usually generalized and symmetric, but may be localized and is more common on the back, face, and shunt arm [12]. However, there is no dermatomal distribution. Pruritus is aggravated by dryness, heat, cold, stress, and showering. The skin is often lacking prominent lesions in the affected patients. However, in addition to xerosis, there may be skin lesions secondary to repetitive scratching, such as excoriation, crusts, impetigo, and prurigo nodularis. Most patients (61%) reported that pruritus has no relation to the timing of dialysis, but some reported that the pruritus was more severe during dialysis (15%), or soon after dialysis (9%), or on non-dialysis days (14%) [3].
Chronic pruritus also developed in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis, although it is less studied compared to patients with hemodialysis. A meta-analysis study showed comparable prevalence of CKD-aP in patients with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis (55% vs. 56%) [13]. However, Min et al. reported a higher prevalence of pruritus in patients with peritoneal dialysis compared to patients with hemodialysis (62.6% vs. 48.3%) [14]. The intensity of pruritus was higher in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis and was associated with lower total weekly Kt/V, longer duration of dialysis, higher dietary protein intake, higher parathyroid hormone, and higher high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [13,15].
Several observations have shown that the prevalence of pruritus declined after renal transplantation [16,17]. A recent large study revealed that pruritus resolved completely in 73.7% (56/76) of renal transplant recipients [18]. Furthermore, pruritus improved or totally resolved in 97.3% of patients (74/76) with renal transplantation. Intriguingly, new onset of pruritus was found in 18.2% (22/121) of patients with renal transplantation with undetermined reasons [18].

3. Diagnosis

Uremic pruritus is defined by itching directly resulting from CKD, without other explainable conditions [19]. Due to its variability and the lack of specific skin lesions, there are no well-established criteria nor laboratory tests for the diagnosis of uremic pruritus. Accurate diagnosis of uremic pruritus may be challenging. Diagnosis requires thorough consideration including dermatologic, renal, hepatobiliary, endocrine, rheumatologic, hematologic or oncologic, neuropathic, and psychogenic causes. The initial approach is to evaluate whether there is primary or inflamed skin lesions to exclude other dermatological causes of pruritus. Common dermatological causes of chronic pruritus include atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, chronic urticaria, dermatophytosis, scabies infestations, and bullous pemphigoid [20]. To be noted, skin lesions secondary to scratching and rubbing, such as crusts, erosions, ulcerations, and prurigo nodularis, should not be counted. Personal drug history should also be reviewed to exclude drug-induced pruritus without visible skin lesions. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, clonidine, calcium antagonists, beta blockers, diuretics, and allopurinol may induce itch by activating mu-opioid receptors [21]. Whether patients have chronic pruritus before deteriorating renal function helps to clarify the diagnosis of uremic pruritus. Referring to dermatologists may help to reach an appropriate diagnosis of uremic pruritus.

4. Pathogenesis

Generally, itch transmission can be defined as histaminergic and non-histaminergic pathways [22]. Due to the insufficient response to antihistamine treatment in uremic pruritus, the non-histaminergic pathway is suggested to be important in uremic pruritus. The pathogenesis of uremic pruritus is not completely understood. The possible pathogenesis of uremic pruritus is multifactorial and includes uremic toxins, immune dysregulation, neuropathy, and opioid imbalance [19,23,24,25,26,27].
The most studied potential pruritogens in the pathogenesis of uremic pruritus include histamine, calcium, phosphate, magnesium, parathyroid hormone, and vitamin A [28,29,30,31]. Uremic toxins, substances accumulating due to impaired renal function, are supposed to participate in uremic pruritus. This is supported by evidence of decreased severity and prevalence of uremic pruritus with the improvement in dialysis efficiency [18,19]. Uremic toxins are further classified as water-soluble small molecules, protein-bound compounds, and middle molecules [32]. Among them, beta-2 microglobulin, indoxyl sulfate, and p-Cresyl sulfate draw researchers’ attention to their possible roles in uremic pruritus [33]. However, a recent metabolomic analysis failed to show different concentrations of water-soluble small molecules in hemodialysis patients with and without itch [34].
The immune system may also participate in the pathogenesis of uremic pruritus. Studies comparing hemodialysis patients with and without uremic pruritus showed significantly enhanced T helper 1 cells and serum interleukin (IL)-6, IL-2, and IL-31 levels in patients with uremic pruritus [23,24,25,35]. Partial responses with immunomodulatory treatments such as calcineurin inhibitors, phototherapy, and mast cell stabilizers in uremic pruritus indicate the role of subclinical inflammation in uremic pruritus [26,36].
Both peripheral neuropathy and central neuropathy are believed to participate in uremic pruritus. One study showed a reduction in innervation in the skin of patients with uremic pruritus [37]. The association of uremic pruritus and restless leg syndrome in dialysis patients and successful treatment with gabapentin implies the role of neuropathy in uremic pruritus [19]. In addition, increasing evidence suggests that both central and peripheral opioid receptors contribute to uremic pruritus. Among three types of opioid receptors, mu-opioid receptor agonists induce itching, and kappa-opioid receptor agonists attenuate itching. Delta-opioid receptor has a limited impact on itching [27]. Recent successful trials of nalbuphine, nalfurafine, and difelikefalin support the hypothesis of opioid system imbalance in uremic pruritus [38,39,40].

5. Treatment

Due to the limited understanding of the pathogenesis of uremic pruritus, current treatments for uremic pruritus remain elusive. There was no Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatment for uremic pruritus until difelikefalin was approved in the United States in 2021 [41,42]. Conventional treatments including emollient, topical agents, antihistamine, dialysis modification, phototherapy, and serotonin receptor antagonists are reviewed here. Recently, more evidence suggests that gabapentin, pregabalin, opioid receptor agonists and antagonists, and biologics play roles in uremic pruritus. We summarize updated treatment options for uremic pruritus in this review. (Table 1)

5.1. Moisturizers

Xerosis is found in 50–85% of patients with uremic pruritus and is an aggravating factor of pruritus [43]. Multiple trials using different emollients including glycerol and paraffin, 10% urea and dexpanthenol, physiological lipids, and baby oil decrease xerosis and pruritus in patients with uremic pruritus [44,45,46,47,48]. Emollient is suggested as first-line therapy in patients with uremic pruritus, especially for those with less severity [19].

5.2. Topical Calcineurin Inhibitor (Tacrolimus, Pimecrolimus)

Tacrolimus, a calcineurin inhibitor, is used for its anti-inflammatory effects in atopic dermatitis and vitiligo [49,50]. A case study reported that 0.03% tacrolimus ointment reduced pruritus intensity in three cases with severe uremic pruritus [51]. However, a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study demonstrated that 0.1% tacrolimus applied twice daily for 4 weeks was not more efficacious than the vehicle [52]. Another 8-week, randomized, double-blind study of 1% pimecrolimus also revealed a lack of efficacy compared to the placebo group [53].

5.3. Other Topical Agents

Capsaicin, a compound found in chili pepper and transient receptor potential vanilloid member 1 (TRPV1) agonist, was used to relieve pain and neuropathy [54]. Three randomized controlled trials of capsaicin cream for uremic pruritus showed limited efficacy [55]. Pramoxine is a topical anesthetic with antipruritic effects. A randomized, double-blind, controlled comparative trial with 28 patients using 1% pramoxine lotion showed a 61% decrease in pruritus intensity compared to 12% in the placebo group [56].

5.4. High Quality of Dialysis

Since uremic toxins are suggested as potential pruritogens, increasing the efficiency of dialysis and modification of hemodialysis prescription is a potential strategy for the treatment of uremic pruritus. One randomized trial found that increased dialysis efficiency with mean Kt/V up to 1.28 resulted in pruritus improvement compared to mean Kt/V of around 1.09 [57]. Dialysis modification to remove more middle molecules also showed improvement in pruritus intensity. Hemodialysis modifications including high-flux hemodialysis [58], hemodiafiltration with hemodialysis [59], and high-permeability hemodialysis [60] have shown significant decreases in pruritus intensity. Therefore, increasing dialysis efficiency as well as modulating dialysis parameters are suggested as first-line treatments in patients with uremic pruritus [12].

5.5. Phototherapy

Phototherapy has been widely used in inflammatory skin diseases such as psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, and vitiligo [49,50,61] by modulating Th1 and Th2 lymphocyte differentiation and attenuating Th1-mediated responses [62,63]. Broadband ultraviolet B phototherapy was found to be effective in patients with uremic pruritus compared to ultraviolet A phototherapy [64]. One single-blind, randomized, controlled trial of 21 patients with uremic pruritus showed a significant improvement in pruritus by narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy and long-wave ultraviolet A phototherapy compared to the non-treated group [62]. A recent controlled trial of narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy revealed a significant reduction in visual analog scale (VAS) from 9.1 to 1.9 compared to treatment with antihistamine and emollients. In addition, the effect was sustained for up to 6 months in most of the study group [65]. Due to its wide adoption in pruritic dermatoses, narrowband ultraviolet B is considered an efficacious treatment in uremic pruritus.

5.6. Antihistamine

Antihistamine, mainly targeting histamine H1 receptor, has been widely used for anti-pruritus. It has been reported that over half of physicians prescribed an oral anti-histamine and one-fourth of them prescribed a topical anti-histamine as first-line therapy for uremic pruritus; however, anti-histamines were generally unsatisfactory for the treatment of uremic pruritus [3,19,66]. In addition, side effects of anti-histamines such as dizziness, sedation, and urine retention are concerns in patients with CKD [19].

5.7. Gabapentin, Pregabalin

Both pregabalin and gabapentin, analogs of gamma-aminobutyric acid, are modulators of neurotransmitters, acting possibly by decreasing neurotransmitter release [67]. The neuropathic role was implicated in the pathogenesis of various pruritic disorders such as brachioradial pruritus and pruritus in patients with diabetic neuropathic pain [68]. Several clinical trials of gabapentin and pregabalin have shown them to be statistically significant in the reduction in pruritus intensity in patients with uremic pruritus [69,70,71,72]. One recent systematic review showed decreased severity of pruritus after treatment with gabapentin in four out of seven studies (n = 171). Incidences of adverse effects with gabapentin including dizziness, drowsiness, and somnolence were higher but not significant in a pooled analysis (n = 290) [73]. Another clinical trial demonstrated that pruritus was relieved in 85% of 71 patients by gabapentin or pregabalin and that patients intolerant to gabapentin might tolerate pregabalin [74]. One study comparing the effects of gabapentin after each dialysis session and pregabalin daily showed a significant improvement in the reduction in pruritus and neuropathic pain in both groups [72]. A systematic review concluded that gabapentin is the most reliable and effective treatment as an off-label treatment for uremic pruritus [75].

5.8. Opioid Receptor Agonist/Antagonist

5.8.1. Naloxone

Intravenous injection of naloxone, a mu-receptor antagonist, was firstly reported to be efficacious in treating uremic pruritus in 1984 [76]. However, inconsistent results were found in subsequent large studies of oral naltrexone for uremic pruritus. In addition, some studies revealed frequent adverse effects such as nausea and sleep disturbance [77,78,79].

5.8.2. Nalfurafine

Nalfurafine, a selective kappa agonist, was found to be effective in uremic pruritus in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study [80]. A phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 337 patients also revealed that nalfurafine significantly reduce the itch severity in intractable uremic pruritus [38]. Nalfurafine was officially approved for clinical use for uremic pruritus in Japan.

5.8.3. Difelikefalin

Recently, difelikefalin, a peripheral restricted and selective kappa opioid receptor agonist, proved its efficacy in the treatment of uremic pruritus in a large double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase III trial [40]. A total of 378 hemodialysis patients with moderate to severe pruritus were randomly treated with intravenous difelikefalin at the dose of 0.5 μg per kilogram or placebo for 12 weeks. Difelikefalin significantly decreased the intensity of pruritus (at least 3 points from baseline according to a 24-h worst itching intensity numerical rating scale) in 51.9% of patients compared to 30.9% of patients in the placebo group. Itch-related quality of life also improved significantly compared to the placebo group. Common adverse events include diarrhea, dizziness, and vomiting, but no adverse events of dysphoria, hallucination, euphoria, or discontinuation-related discomfort were reported in the difelikefalin group. Based on the successful results of the phase III trial, difelikefalin was approved by the FDA in the United States in 2021. A regulatory review is ongoing in Europe and a phase III trial is in progress in Japan. Oral difelikefalin is under investigation [41].

5.8.4. Nalbuphine

Nalbuphine, a combination of kappa-opioid receptor antagonist and mu-opioid receptor agonist, has been reported to be beneficial for morphine-related itch [81]. In addition, nalbuphine also decreased the intensity of uremic pruritus [39]. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 373 hemodialysis patients with moderate to severe pruritus demonstrated that the group receiving nalbuphine 120 mg twice daily for 8 weeks reported significantly decreased pruritus. However, there was no significant difference between nalbuphine at the dose of 60 mg twice daily and the placebo group.

5.9. Mast Cell Stabilizer

Mast cell stabilizers, which prevent degranulation of inflammatory mediators from mast cells, have been shown to be effective in uremic pruritus, and include topical cromolyn sodium [82], oral cromolyn sodium [83], ketotifen [70], and zinc sulfate [84]. One double-blind, randomized clinical trial of 52 patients revealed similar efficacy in decreasing pruritus severity and no significant difference in adverse effect with gabapentin and ketotifen [70]. However, one randomized control trial of 36 patients with 4-week duration of zinc sulfate showed non-significant reduction in pruritus in hemodialysis patients [85]. Mast cell stabilizer is safe and potentially efficacious in uremic pruritus, but more studies are needed.

5.10. Montelukast

Leukotriene B4, primarily released by macrophage and leukocytes, is involved in itch and may induce scratching [86,87]. Montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, is used in atopic dermatitis, asthma, allergic rhinitis, and idiopathic urticaria. One randomized double-blind controlled trial of 80 hemodialysis patients receiving 10 mg montelukast daily for 30 days revealed that montelukast significantly decreased pruritus compared to the placebo group. The authors concluded that montelukast might serve as an add-on treatment in intractable uremic pruritus [88].

5.11. Serotonin Receptor Antagonist: Ondansetron

5-HT3 receptor antagonists have been studied for their treatment efficacy in uremic pruritus. Ondansetron, a selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, had an insignificant effect on uremic pruritus in two randomized controlled trials [89,90].

5.12. Nemolizumab

Due to the higher concentration of IL-31 in hemodialysis patients with uremic pruritus, the role of nemolizumab, an IL-31 receptor alpha antibody, in the treatment of uremic pruritus is suggested [23]. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIB trial of a single dose of nemolizumab was conducted in 69 patients with uremic pruritus but failed to meet the primary efficacy endpoint [91].

5.13. Dupilumab

As the possible involvement of IL-31 was implicated in uremic pruritus, the role of T-helper 2, which is the upstream regulator of IL-31, in uremic pruritus has been suggested. Dupilumab, an IL-4 receptor alpha-blocker, was reported to successfully treat cases with intractable uremic pruritus [92,93]. More studies are necessary.

5.14. Acupuncture, Acupressure

Acupuncture, defined by acupuncture needle insertion into specific points of the skin as treatment, has long been used for a variety of symptoms, such as acute or chronic pain, sleep disturbance, and poor quality of life in East Asia [94]. Acupuncture was believed to act through modulating the endogenous opioid system [95], which accounts for the hypothesis of it treating uremic treatment. Similarly, acupressure stimulates the acupuncture points with body parts of practitioners or designed equipment. A systematic review including six trials showed that acupuncture and acupressure were effective for uremic pruritus [96]. Recent studies comparing Zolpidem and acupressure revealed that both improved sleep quality and quality of life in patients with uremic pruritus-associated sleep disturbance [97,98]. However, more evidence is needed to affirm this as a recommended treatment for uremic pruritus.

5.15. Charcoal

Given the hypothesis of non-dialyzable uremic toxins as possible pruritogens, the adequate removal of potential toxins by charcoal is a reasonable therapeutic option. Activated charcoal, a non-selective absorbent, is usually used for detoxication in certain kinds of poisoning. An 11-patient, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study showed that a daily dose of 6 g of activated charcoal for 8 weeks decreased pruritus in most patients with uremic pruritus [99]. In addition, coated charcoal in extracorporeal techniques showed decreased levels of parathyroid hormone and pruritus in a study of 12 patients [100]. Although evidence with large case numbers and well-designed studies are lacking, a recent review showed a promising role of charcoal in uremic pruritus [101].

5.16. Other Treatment

Early studies have proposed the association of uremic pruritus with hyperthyroidism, calcium, and phosphate. It is reported that the level of calcium multiplied by phosphate is correlated with the extent of pruritus after parathyroidectomy, and intractable pruritus improved after parathyroidectomy in some cases [102,103].
Thalidomide, an immunomodulator and neuromodulator, was initially observed to reduce pruritus in dialysis patients with leprosy [104]. One early randomized, crossover study with 29 patients found a statistically significant decrease in pruritus in the thalidomide group [105].
Gamma-linolenic acid (GLA), an essential acid, is thought to modulate T lymphocytes and lymphokines. In one small-sized, randomized control trial, GLA-enriched cream significantly improved the pruritus severity in dialysis patients [106].
Cannabinoids act on the endocannabinoid system to modulate pruritus and shed light on the treatment of chronic and refractory pruritus with legalized medical marijuana [107]. In a study of 21 patients applying topical cream containing structured physiological lipids, anandamide, and palmitoylethanoamine twice daily for 3 weeks, 8 out of 21 patients with uremic pruritus were completely free from pruritus [45]. However, randomized trials for cannabinoids are lacking [108].
Kidney transplantation, a kidney replacement therapy, largely decreased or cured chronic pruritus in patients with uremic pruritus [12,18,109]. Other medical considerations remain issues due to the shortage of human kidneys.
Catabolism of exogenous protein may lead to the retention of protein-bound molecules. Therefore, protein-restrictive diets and probiotics may serve as a potential treatments for uremic pruritus [101]. Omega-3 supplements were found to be effective to decrease pruritus in a cross-randomized trial [110].
Table
Table 1. Summary of studies of interventions for uremic pruritus.
Table 1. Summary of studies of interventions for uremic pruritus.
AuthorsStudy DesignParticipantsEnrollmentInterventionComparatorEfficacy
Duque et al. (2005) [52]Randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled studyHDN = 220.1% tacrolimus ointment twice daily for 4 weeksVehicleNo significant effect.
Ghorbani et al. (2011) [53]Randomized double-blind studyNot mentionedN = 60Pimecrolimus 1% twice daily for 8 weeksPlaceboNo significant effect.
Ko et al. (2011) [62]Single-blind, randomized, controlled trialHD, PD, CKDN = 21NB-UVB phototherapy three times a week for 6 weeksLong-wave UVA radiationSignificant and comparable improvement in the VAS scores in both groups.
Sherjeena et al. (2017) [65]Controlled trialCKD, stage IV, VN = 30NBUVB phototherapy every 3 days for 15 sessionsTopical liquid paraffin, 10 mg oral cetirizine dailySignificant effect.
VAS 9.13 to 1.9 at 3 months (NBUVB).
VAS 9.1 to 8.8 at 3 months (control).
Mapar et al. (2015) [85]Pilot randomized, triple-blind studyHDN = 36Zinc sulfate 220 mg daily for 4 weeksPlaceboNo significant effect.
Mahmudpour et al. (2017) [88]Randomized double-blind controlled trialHDN = 80Montelukast 10 mg daily for 30 daysPlaceboReduction in VAS score was significantly greater in the montelukast group (2.73) compared to placebo group (5.47).
Amirkhanlou (2016) [70]Double-blind randomized clinical trialHDN = 52Gabapentin 100 mg daily for 2 weeksKetotifen 1 mg twice daily for 2 weeksSignificant reduction in both groups (88.4% in gabapentin group vs. 76.9% in group ketotifen group).
Eusebio-Alpapara et al. (2020) [73]Meta-analysisHDN = 315Gabapentin 100 mg daily, 100–400 mg 2–4 times per weekAntihistamine, pregabalin, placeboGabapentin decreased the pruritus severity compared to the placebo (n = 171).
Kumagai et al. (2010) [38]Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studyHDN = 337Nalfurafine hydrochloride 5 μg, 2.5 μg for 14 daysPlaceboSignificant reduction in VAS in both dosages of nalfurafine
compared to placebo.
Mathur et al. (2017) [39]Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trialHDN = 373Nalbuphine 120 mg, 60 mg twice daily for 8 weeksPlaceboSignificant effect with nalbuphine 120 mg, but not with nalbuphine 60 mg.
Fishbane et al. (2020) [40]Double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trialHDN = 378Intravenous difelikefalin 0.5 μg per kilogram
per week for 12 weeks		PlaceboA decrease of at least 3 points (WI-NRS score) in 49.1% of the difelikefalin group (27.9% of the placebo group).
Kinugasa et al. (2021) [91]Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical studyHDN = 69Nemolizumab
0.125, 0.5, 2.0 mg/kg on day 1		PlaceboNo significant effect.
HD, hemodialysis; PD, peritoneal dialysis; CKD, chronic kidney disease; VAS, visual analog scale; NB, narrow band; WI-NRS, worst itch numeric rating scale. The data were retrieved by 25 March 2022.

6. Proposed Algorithm from Diagnosis to Treatment

Based on the updated evidence, we propose the diagnosis and treatment algorithm in CKD patients (Figure 1). Firstly, any pruritus and skin condition should be evaluated in patients with CKD every visit. If primary skin lesions or acute pruritus are present, physicians may refer patients to dermatologists to exclude other common causes of itch. Screening laboratory examinations including complete blood count, differential count, liver function test, renal function test, thyroid function, and electrolytes should also be arranged to exclude other systemic etiologies. Once an accurate diagnosis of uremic pruritus is made, physicians may initiate an emollient for skin rehydration. The dialysis efficacy should also be re-evaluated to increase efficiency and correct electrolytes in case of imbalance. Modification with dialysis membrane is suggested to remove middle molecules and protein-bound molecules [111]. Difelikefalin was the first FDA-approved medicine for uremic pruritus in the United States. Gabapentin, NBUVB, and difelikefalin may be considered as first-line treatments. Mast cell stabilizers, montelukast, nalbuphine, nalfurafine, acupuncture or acupressure, and activated charcoal may be considered as alternative therapies. Diet adjustment with low protein and probiotics also serve as potential treatment strategies. Treatment options are listed and classified according to potential targeted etiologies (Figure 2). Kidney transplantation is considered in extreme cases.

7. Conclusions

In this review, we summarized the current evidence on diagnosis and treatment of uremic pruritus. Given the limitations of proper diagnosis of uremic pruritus, we proposed an algorithm for more accurate diagnosis of uremic pruritus. In summary, a complete assessment to exclude occult itch origin and early diagnosis of uremic pruritus are essential. Emollients and dialysis modification are general preventive guidance in the treatment of uremic pruritus. Gabapentin, phototherapy, and FDA-approved difelikefalin are promising treatment options for recalcitrant uremic pruritus. Other developing treatments are opioid mediators, neural transmission mediators, and biologics targeting IL-31. Due to the high prevalence and unsatisfactory treatment response, more research on uremic pruritus should be prioritized.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.-Y.C. and L.-S.W.; writing—original draft preparation, A.-Y.C.; writing—review and editing, A.-Y.C. and L.-S.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by grants from the Chang Gung Medical Research Program (CMRPG8K0731 and CMRPG8L0831) of Taiwan.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the grant support from the Chang Gung Medical Research Program (CMRPG8K0731 and CMRPG8L0831).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sukul, N.; Speyer, E.; Tu, C.; Bieber, B.A.; Li, Y.; Lopes, A.A.; Asahi, K.; Mariani, L.; Laville, M.; Rayner, H.C.; et al. Pruritus and Patient Reported Outcomes in Non-Dialysis CKD. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2019, 14, 673–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pisoni, R.L.; Wikström, B.; Elder, S.J.; Akizawa, T.; Asano, Y.; Keen, M.L.; Saran, R.; Mendelssohn, D.C.; Young, E.W.; Port, F.K. Pruritus in haemodialysis patients: International results from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 2006, 21, 3495–3505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Rayner, H.C.; Larkina, M.; Wang, M.; Graham-Brown, M.; van der Veer, S.N.; Ecder, T.; Hasegawa, T.; Kleophas, W.; Bieber, B.A.; Tentori, F.; et al. International Comparisons of Prevalence, Awareness, and Treatment of Pruritus in People on Hemodialysis. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2017, 12, 2000–2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Kim, D.; Pollock, C. Epidemiology and burden of chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus. Clin. Kidney J. 2021, 14, i1–i7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ramakrishnan, K.; Bond, T.C.; Claxton, A.; Sood, V.C.; Kootsikas, M.; Agnese, W.; Sibbel, S. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of end-stage renal disease patients with self-reported pruritus symptoms. Int. J. Nephrol. Renovasc. Dis. 2013, 7, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Weiss, M.; Mettang, T.; Tschulena, U.; Passlick-Deetjen, J.; Weisshaar, E. Prevalence of chronic itch and associated factors in haemodialysis patients: A representative cross-sectional study. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2015, 95, 816–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Weisshaar, E.; Weiss, M.; Passlick-Deetjen, J.; Tschulena, U.; Maleki, K.; Mettang, T. Laboratory and dialysis characteristics in hemodialysis patients suffering from chronic itch--results from a representative cross-sectional study. BMC Nephrol. 2015, 16, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Mathur, V.S.; Lindberg, J.; Germain, M.; Block, G.; Tumlin, J.; Smith, M.; Grewal, M.; McGuire, D. A longitudinal study of uremic pruritus in hemodialysis patients. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2010, 5, 1410–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Kimata, N.; Fuller, D.S.; Saito, A.; Akizawa, T.; Fukuhara, S.; Pisoni, R.L.; Robinson, B.M.; Akiba, T. Pruritus in hemodialysis patients: Results from the Japanese Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (JDOPPS). Hemodial. Int. 2014, 18, 657–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ting, S.W.; Fan, P.C.; Lin, Y.S.; Lin, M.S.; Lee, C.C.; Kuo, G.; Chang, C.H. Uremic pruritus and long-term morbidities in the dialysis population. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0241088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ting, S.W.; Fan, P.C.; Lin, Y.S.; Lin, M.S.; Lee, C.C.; Kuo, G.; Chang, C.H. Association between uremic pruritus and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing dialysis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2020, 83, 924–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mettang, T.; Kremer, A.E. Uremic pruritus. Kidney Int. 2015, 87, 685–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Hu, X.; Sang, Y.; Yang, M.; Chen, X.; Tang, W. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus among adult dialysis patients: A meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies. Medicine 2018, 97, e10633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Min, J.W.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, Y.O.; Jin, D.C.; Song, H.C.; Choi, E.J.; Kim, Y.L.; Kim, Y.S.; Kang, S.W.; Kim, N.H.; et al. Comparison of uremic pruritus between patients undergoing hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Res. Clin. Pract. 2016, 35, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Wu, H.Y.; Huang, J.W.; Tsai, W.C.; Peng, Y.S.; Chen, H.Y.; Yang, J.Y.; Hsu, S.P.; Pai, M.F.; Ko, M.J.; Hung, K.Y.; et al. Prognostic importance and determinants of uremic pruritus in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis: A prospective cohort study. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0203474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Schricker, S.; Weisshaar, E.; Kupfer, J.; Mettang, T. Prevalence of Pruritus in a Single Cohort of Long-term Kidney Transplant Recipients. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2020, 100, adv00066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Krajewski, P.K.; Krajewska, M.; Szepietowski, J.C. Pruritus in renal transplant recipients: Current state of knowledge. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2020, 29, 769–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Krajewski, P.K.; Olczyk, P.; Krajewska, M.; Krajewski, W.; Szepietowski, J.C. Clinical Characteristics of Itch in Renal Transplant Recipients. Front. Med. 2021, 7, 615334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Verduzco, H.A.; Shirazian, S. CKD-Associated Pruritus: New Insights into Diagnosis, Pathogenesis, and Management. Kidney Int. Rep. 2020, 5, 1387–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Roh, Y.S.; Choi, J.; Sutaria, N.; Kwatra, S.G. Itch: Epidemiology, clinical presentation, and diagnostic workup. J. Am. Acad Dermatol. 2022, 86, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Manenti, L.; Leuci, E. Do you feel itchy? A guide towards diagnosis and measurement of chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus in dialysis patients. Clin. Kidney J. 2021, 14, i8–i15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sutaria, N.; Adawi, W.; Goldberg, R.; Roh, Y.S.; Choi, J.; Kwatra, S.G. Itch: Pathogenesis and treatment. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2022, 86, 17–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Oweis, A.O.; Al-Qarqaz, F.; Bodoor, K.; Heis, L.; Alfaqih, M.A.; Almomani, R.; Obeidat, M.A.; Alshelleh, S.A. Elevated interleukin 31 serum levels in hemodialysis patients are associated with uremic pruritus. Cytokine 2021, 138, 155369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fallahzadeh, M.K.; Roozbeh, J.; Geramizadeh, B.; Namazi, M.R. Interleukin-2 serum levels are elevated in patients with uremic pruritus: A novel finding with practical implications. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 2011, 26, 3338–3344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Kimmel, M.; Alscher, D.M.; Dunst, R.; Braun, N.; Machleidt, C.; Kiefer, T.; Stülten, C.; van der Kuip, H.; Pauli-Magnus, C.; Raub, U.; et al. The role of micro-inflammation in the pathogenesis of uraemic pruritus in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 2006, 21, 749–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Schricker, S.; Kimmel, M. Unravelling the pathophysiology of chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus. Clin. Kidney J. 2021, 14, i23–i31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Melo, H.; Basso, L.; Iftinca, M.; MacNaughton, W.K.; Hollenberg, M.D.; McKay, D.M.; Altier, C. Itch induced by peripheral mu opioid receptors is dependent on TRPV1-expressing neurons and alleviated by channel activation. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 15551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yatzidis, H.; Digenis, P.; Fountas, P. Hypervitaminosis A accompanying advanced chronic renal failure. Br. Med. J. 1975, 3, 352–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Dugas-Breit, S.; Schöpf, P.; Dugas, M.; Schiffl, H.; Ruëff, F.; Przybilla, B. Baseline serum levels of mast cell tryptase are raised in hemodialysis patients and associated with severity of pruritus. J. Dtsch. Dermatol. Ges. 2005, 3, 343–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bencini, P.L.; Pravettoni, G.; Crosti, C. Cutaneous divalent ions and uremic pruritus. G. Ital. Dermatol. Venereol. 1988, 123, 143–145. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ståhle-Bäckdahl, M.; Hägermark, O.; Lins, L.E.; Törring, O.; Hilliges, M.; Johansson, O. Experimental and immunohistochemical studies on the possible role of parathyroid hormone in uraemic pruritus. J. Intern. Med. 1989, 225, 411–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Vanholder, R.; De Smet, R.; Glorieux, G.; Argilés, A.; Baurmeister, U.; Brunet, P.; Clark, W.; Cohen, G.; De Deyn, P.P.; Deppisch, R.; et al. Review on uremic toxins: Classification, concentration, and interindividual variability. Kidney Int. 2003, 63, 1934–1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Vanholder, R.; Schepers, E.; Pletinck, A.; Nagler, E.V.; Glorieux, G. The uremic toxicity of indoxyl sulfate and p-cresyl sulfate: A systematic review. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2014, 25, 1897–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bolanos, C.G.; Pham, N.M.; Mair, R.D.; Meyer, T.W.; Sirich, T.L. Metabolomic analysis of uremic pruritus in patients on hemodialysis. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0246765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ko, M.J.; Peng, Y.S.; Chen, H.Y.; Hsu, S.P.; Pai, M.F.; Yang, J.Y.; Wen, S.Y.; Jee, S.H.; Wu, H.Y.; Chiu, H.C. Interleukin-31 is associated with uremic pruritus in patients receiving hemodialysis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2014, 71, 1151–1159.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Arzhan, S.; Roumelioti, M.E.; Unruh, M.L. Itch and Ache on Dialysis: New Approaches to Manage Uremic Pruritus and Restless Legs. Blood Purif. 2020, 49, 222–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fantini, F.; Baraldi, A.; Sevignani, C.; Spattini, A.; Pincelli, C.; Giannetti, A. Cutaneous innervation in chronic renal failure patients. An immunohistochemical study. Acta Derm. Venereol. 1992, 72, 102–105. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kumagai, H.; Ebata, T.; Takamori, K.; Muramatsu, T.; Nakamoto, H.; Suzuki, H. Effect of a novel kappa-receptor agonist, nalfurafine hydrochloride, on severe itch in 337 haemodialysis patients: A Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 2009, 25, 1251–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Mathur, V.S.; Kumar, J.; Crawford, P.W.; Hait, H.; Sciascia, T. A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Nalbuphine ER Tablets for Uremic Pruritus. Am. J. Nephrol. 2017, 46, 450–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fishbane, S.; Jamal, A.; Munera, C.; Wen, W.; Menzaghi, F. A Phase 3 Trial of Difelikefalin in Hemodialysis Patients with Pruritus. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 222–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Deeks, E.D. Difelikefalin: First Approval. Drugs 2021, 81, 1937–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lipman, Z.M.; Yosipovitch, G. An evaluation of difelikefalin as a treatment option for moderate-to-severe pruritus in end stage renal disease. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2021, 22, 549–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Szepietowski, J.C.; Reich, A.; Schwartz, R.A. Uraemic xerosis. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 2004, 19, 2709–2712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Balaskas, E.; Szepietowski, J.C.; Bessis, D.; Ioannides, D.; Ponticelli, C.; Ghienne, C.; Taberly, A.; Dupuy, P. Randomized, double-blind study with glycerol and paraffin in uremic xerosis. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2011, 6, 748–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Szepietowski, J.C.; Szepietowski, T.; Reich, A. Efficacy and tolerance of the cream containing structured physiological lipids with endocannabinoids in the treatment of uremic pruritus: A preliminary study. Acta Dermatovenerol. Croat. 2005, 13, 97–103. [Google Scholar]
  46. Okada, K.; Matsumoto, K. Effect of skin care with an emollient containing a high water content on mild uremic pruritus. Ther. Apher. Dial. 2004, 8, 419–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Morton, C.A.; Lafferty, M.; Hau, C.; Henderson, I.; Jones, M.; Lowe, J.G. Pruritus and skin hydration during dialysis. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 1996, 11, 2031–2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Singh, V.S.; Vinayadev, V. Effectiveness of Baby Oil Therapy for Uremic Pruritus in Hemodialysis Patients. Saudi J. Kidney Dis. Transpl. 2021, 32, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rodrigues, M.; Ezzedine, K.; Hamzavi, I.; Pandya, A.G.; Harris, J.E. Current and emerging treatments for vitiligo. J. Am. Acad Dermatol. 2017, 77, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Langan, S.M.; Irvine, A.D.; Weidinger, S. Atopic dermatitis. Lancet 2020, 396, 345–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pauli-Magnus, C.; Klumpp, S.; Alscher, D.M.; Kuhlmann, U.; Mettang, T. Short-term efficacy of tacrolimus ointment in severe uremic pruritus. Perit. Dial. Int. 2000, 20, 802–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Duque, M.I.; Yosipovitch, G.; Fleischer, A.B., Jr.; Willard, J.; Freedman, B.I. Lack of efficacy of tacrolimus ointment 0.1% for treatment of hemodialysis-related pruritus: A randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2005, 52, 519–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ghorbani, A.R.; Feily, A.; Khalili, A.; Dormanesh, B. Lack of efficacy of topical calcineurin inhibitor pimecrolimus 1% on pruritus of severely uremic patients: A randomized double-blind study in 60 patients. Dermatitis 2011, 22, 167–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Blair, H.A. Capsaicin 8% Dermal Patch: A Review in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain. Drugs 2018, 78, 1489–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gooding, S.M.; Canter, P.H.; Coelho, H.F.; Boddy, K.; Ernst, E. Systematic review of topical capsaicin in the treatment of pruritus. Int. J. Dermatol. 2010, 49, 858–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Young, T.A.; Patel, T.S.; Camacho, F.; Clark, A.; Freedman, B.I.; Kaur, M.; Fountain, J.; Williams, L.L.; Yosipovitch, G.; Fleischer, A.B., Jr. A pramoxine-based anti-itch lotion is more effective than a control lotion for the treatment of uremic pruritus in adult hemodialysis patients. J. Dermatol. Treat. 2009, 20, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hiroshige, K.; Kabashima, N.; Takasugi, M.; Kuroiwa, A. Optimal dialysis improves uremic pruritus. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 1995, 25, 413–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jiang, X.; Ji, F.; Chen, Z.W.; Huang, Q.L. Comparison of high-flux hemodialysis with hemodialysis filtration in treatment of uraemic pruritus: A randomized controlled trial. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2016, 48, 1533–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, J.; Yuan, Y.; An, X.; Ouyang, C.; Ren, H.; Yang, G.; Yu, X.; Lv, X.; Zhang, B.; Wang, N.; et al. Comparison of combined blood purification techniques in treatment of dialysis patients with uraemic pruritus. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2016, 9, 8563–8568. [Google Scholar]
  60. Chen, Z.J.; Cao, G.; Tang, W.X.; Lv, X.Y.; Huang, S.M.; Qin, W.; Ping, F.; Ye, T. A randomized controlled trial of high-permeability haemodialysis against conventional haemodialysis in the treatment of uraemic pruritus. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 2009, 34, 679–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Armstrong, A.W.; Read, C. Pathophysiology, Clinical Presentation, and Treatment of Psoriasis: A Review. JAMA 2020, 323, 1945–1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ko, M.J.; Yang, J.Y.; Wu, H.Y.; Hu, F.C.; Chen, S.I.; Tsai, P.J.; Jee, S.H.; Chiu, H.C. Narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy for patients with refractory uraemic pruritus: A randomized controlled trial. Br. J. Dermatol. 2011, 165, 633–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Garssen, J.; Vandebriel, R.J.; De Gruijl, F.R.; Wolvers, D.A.; Van Dijk, M.; Fluitman, A.; Van Loveren, H. UVB exposure-induced systemic modulation of Th1- and Th2-mediated immune responses. Immunology 1999, 97, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Gilchrest, B.A.; Rowe, J.W.; Brown, R.S.; Steinman, T.I.; Arndt, K.A. Relief of uremic pruritus with ultraviolet phototherapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 1977, 297, 136–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sherjeena, P.B.; Binitha, M.P.; Rajan, U.; Sreelatha, M.; Sarita, S.; Nirmal, C.; Deepthi, N.S. A controlled trial of narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy for the treatment of uremic pruritus. Indian J. Dermatol. Venereol. Leprol. 2017, 83, 247–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Weisshaar, E.; Dunker, N.; Röhl, F.W.; Gollnick, H. Antipruritic effects of two different 5-HT3 receptor antagonists and an antihistamine in haemodialysis patients. Exp. Dermatol. 2004, 13, 298–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Robertson, K.; Marshman, L.A.G.; Plummer, D.; Downs, E. Effect of Gabapentin vs Pregabalin on Pain Intensity in Adults With Chronic Sciatica: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2019, 76, 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Gunal, A.I.; Ozalp, G.; Yoldas, T.K.; Gunal, S.Y.; Kirciman, E.; Celiker, H. Gabapentin therapy for pruritus in haemodialysis patients: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 2004, 19, 3137–3139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Foroutan, N.; Etminan, A.; Nikvarz, N.; Shojai Shahrokh Abadi, M. Comparison of pregabalin with doxepin in the management of uremic pruritus: A randomized single blind clinical trial. Hemodial. Int. 2017, 21, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Amirkhanlou, S.; Rashedi, A.; Taherian, J.; Hafezi, A.A.; Parsaei, S. Comparison of Gabapentin and Ketotifen in Treatment of Uremic Pruritus in Hemodialysis Patients. Pak. J. Med. Sci. 2016, 32, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Nofal, E.; Farag, F.; Nofal, A.; Eldesouky, F.; Alkot, R.; Abdelkhalik, Z. Gabapentin: A promising therapy for uremic pruritus in hemodialysis patients: A randomized-controlled trial and review of literature. J. Dermatol. Treat. 2016, 27, 515–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Solak, Y.; Biyik, Z.; Atalay, H.; Gaipov, A.; Guney, F.; Turk, S.; Covic, A.; Goldsmith, D.; Kanbay, M. Pregabalin versus gabapentin in the treatment of neuropathic pruritus in maintenance haemodialysis patients: A prospective, crossover study. Nephrology 2012, 17, 710–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Eusebio-Alpapara, K.M.V.; Castillo, R.L.; Dofitas, B.L. Gabapentin for uremic pruritus: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Int. J. Dermatol. 2020, 59, 412–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Rayner, H.; Baharani, J.; Smith, S.; Suresh, V.; Dasgupta, I. Uraemic pruritus: Relief of itching by gabapentin and pregabalin. Nephron Clin. Pract. 2012, 122, 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Simonsen, E.; Komenda, P.; Lerner, B.; Askin, N.; Bohm, C.; Shaw, J.; Tangri, N.; Rigatto, C. Treatment of Uremic Pruritus: A Systematic Review. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2017, 70, 638–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Andersen, L.W.; Friedberg, M.; Lokkegaard, N. Naloxone in the treatment of uremic pruritus: A case history. Clin. Nephrol. 1984, 21, 355–356. [Google Scholar]
  77. Peer, G.; Kivity, S.; Agami, O.; Fireman, E.; Silverberg, D.; Blum, M.; Laina, A. Randomised crossover trial of naltrexone in uraemic pruritus. Lancet 1996, 348, 1552–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Pauli-Magnus, C.; Mikus, G.; Alscher, D.M.; Kirschner, T.; Nagel, W.; Gugeler, N.; Risler, T.; Berger, E.D.; Kuhlmann, U.; Mettang, T. Naltrexone Does Not Relieve Uremic Pruritus: Results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-control crossover study. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2000, 11, 514–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Legroux-Crespel, E.; Clèdes, J.; Misery, L. A comparative study on the effects of naltrexone and loratadine on uremic pruritus. Dermatology 2004, 208, 326–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wikström, B.; Gellert, R.; Ladefoged, S.D.; Danda, Y.; Akai, M.; Ide, K.; Ogasawara, M.; Kawashima, Y.; Ueno, K.; Mori, A.; et al. Kappa-opioid system in uremic pruritus: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical studies. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2005, 16, 3742–3747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Liao, C.C.; Chang, C.S.; Tseng, C.H.; Sheen, M.J.; Tsai, S.C.; Chang, Y.L.; Wong, S.Y. Efficacy of intramuscular nalbuphine versus diphenhydramine for the prevention of epidural morphine-induced pruritus after cesarean delivery. Chang. Gung Med. J. 2011, 34, 172–178. [Google Scholar]
  82. Feily, A.; Dormanesh, B.; Ghorbani, A.R.; Moosavi, Z.; Kouchak, M.; Cheraghian, B.; Mousavi, S.S.; Mehrabian, A.; Ranjbari, N. Efficacy of topical cromolyn sodium 4% on pruritus in uremic nephrogenic patients: A randomized double-blind study in 60 patients. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2012, 50, 510–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Rosner, M.H. Cromolyn sodium: A potential therapy for uremic pruritus? Hemodial. Int. 2006, 10, 189–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Najafabadi, M.M.; Faghihi, G.; Emami, A.; Monghad, M.; Moeenzadeh, F.; Sharif, N.; Davarpanah Jazi, A.H. Zinc sulfate for relief of pruritus in patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Ther. Apher. Dial. 2012, 16, 142–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Mapar, M.A.; Pazyar, N.; Siahpoosh, A.; Latifi, S.M.; Beladi Mousavi, S.S.; Khazanee, A. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of zinc sulfate vs. placebo in the treatment of pruritus of hemodialytic patients: A pilot randomized, triple-blind study. G. Ital. Dermatol. Venereol. 2015, 150, 351–355. [Google Scholar]
  86. Kremer, A.E.; Feramisco, J.; Reeh, P.W.; Beuers, U.; Oude Elferink, R.P. Receptors, cells and circuits involved in pruritus of systemic disorders. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1842, 869–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Toyama, S.; Tominaga, M.; Takamori, K. Connections between Immune-Derived Mediators and Sensory Nerves for Itch Sensation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Mahmudpour, M.; Roozbeh, J.; Raiss Jalali, G.A.; Pakfetrat, M.; Ezzat Zadegan, S.; Sagheb, M.M. Therapeutic Effect of Montelukast for Treatment of Uremic Pruritus in Hemodialysis Patients. Iran J. Kidney Dis. 2017, 11, 50–55. [Google Scholar]
  89. Wang, W.; Zhou, L.; Sun, L. Ondansetron for neuraxial morphine-induced pruritus: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 2017, 42, 383–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. To, T.H.; Clark, K.; Lam, L.; Shelby-James, T.; Currow, D.C. The role of ondansetron in the management of cholestatic or uremic pruritus—A systematic review. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 2012, 44, 725–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Kinugasa, E.; Igawa, K.; Shimada, H.; Kondo, M.; Funakoshi, S.; Imada, N.; Itami, N.; Fukazawa, N.; Takubo, R.; Kawata, Y.; et al. Anti-pruritic effect of nemolizumab in hemodialysis patients with uremic pruritus: A phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study. Clin. Exp. Nephrol. 2021, 25, 875–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Silverberg, J.I.; Brieva, J. A successful case of dupilumab treatment for severe uremic pruritus. JAAD Case Rep. 2019, 5, 339–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Zhai, L.L.; Savage, K.T.; Qiu, C.C.; Jin, A.; Valdes-Rodriguez, R.; Mollanazar, N.K. Chronic Pruritus Responding to Dupilumab-A Case Series. Medicines 2019, 6, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Kim, K.H.; Lee, M.S.; Choi, S.M. Acupuncture for treating uremic pruritus in patients with end-stage renal disease: A systematic review. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 2010, 40, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Chen, T.; Zhang, W.W.; Chu, Y.X.; Wang, Y.Q. Acupuncture for Pain Management: Molecular Mechanisms of Action. Am. J. Chin. Med. 2020, 48, 793–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Badiee Aval, S.; Ravanshad, Y.; Azarfar, A.; Mehrad-Majd, H.; Torabi, S.; Ravanshad, S. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Using Acupuncture and Acupressure for Uremic Pruritus. Iran J. Kidney Dis. 2018, 12, 78–83. [Google Scholar]
  97. Rehman, I.U.; Wu, D.B.; Ahmed, R.; Khan, N.A.; Rahman, A.U.; Munib, S.; Lee, L.H.; Chan, K.G.; Khan, T.M. A randomized controlled trial for effectiveness of zolpidem versus acupressure on sleep in hemodialysis patients having chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus. Medicine 2018, 97, e10764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Rehman, I.U.; Ahmed, R.; Rahman, A.U.; Wu, D.B.C.; Munib, S.; Shah, Y.; Khan, N.A.; Rehman, A.U.; Lee, L.H.; Chan, K.G.; et al. Effectiveness and safety profiling of zolpidem and acupressure in CKD associated pruritus: An interventional study. Medicine 2021, 100, e25995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Pederson, J.A.; Matter, B.J.; Czerwinski, A.W.; Llach, F. Relief of idiopathic generalized pruritus in dialysis patients treated with activated oral charcoal. Ann. Intern. Med. 1980, 93, 446–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Morachiello, P.; Landini, S.; Fracasso, A.; Righetto, F.; Scanferla, F.; Toffoletto, P.; Genchi, R.; Bazzato, G. Combined hemodialysis-hemoperfusion in the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism of uremic patients. Blood Purif. 1991, 9, 148–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Cupisti, A.; Piccoli, G.B.; Gallieni, M. Charcoal for the management of pruritus and uremic toxins in patients with chronic kidney disease. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2020, 29, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Massry, S.G.; Popovtzer, M.M.; Coburn, J.W.; Makoff, D.L.; Maxwell, M.H.; Kleeman, C.R. Intractable pruritus as a manifestation of secondary hyperparathyroidism in uremia. Disappearance of itching after subtotal parathyroidectomy. N. Engl. J. Med. 1968, 279, 697–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Chou, F.F.; Ho, J.C.; Huang, S.C.; Sheen-Chen, S.M. A study on pruritus after parathyroidectomy for secondary hyperparathyroidism. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2000, 190, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Sharma, D.; Kwatra, S.G. Thalidomide for the treatment of chronic refractory pruritus. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2016, 74, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Silva, S.R.; Viana, P.C.; Lugon, N.V.; Hoette, M.; Ruzany, F.; Lugon, J.R. Thalidomide for the treatment of uremic pruritus: A crossover randomized double-blind trial. Nephron 1994, 67, 270–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Chen, Y.C.; Chiu, W.T.; Wu, M.S. Therapeutic effect of topical gamma-linolenic acid on refractory uremic pruritus. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2006, 48, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Avila, C.; Massick, S.; Kaffenberger, B.H.; Kwatra, S.G.; Bechtel, M. Cannabinoids for the treatment of chronic pruritus: A review. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2020, 82, 1205–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Rein, J.L.; Wyatt, C.M. Marijuana and Cannabinoids in ESRD and Earlier Stages of CKD. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2018, 71, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Mettang, T. Uremic Itch Management. Curr. Probl. Dermatol. 2016, 50, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Forouhari, A.; Moghtaderi, M.; Raeisi, S.; Shahidi, S.; Parin Hedayati, Z.; Zaboliyan, J.; Ani, S.; Moeinzadeh, F.; Mortazavi, M. Pruritus-reducing effects of omega-3 fatty acids in hemodialysis patients: A cross-over randomized clinical trial. Hemodial. Int. 2022. online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Lipman, Z.M.; Paramasivam, V.; Yosipovitch, G.; Germain, M.J. Clinical management of chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus: Current treatment options and future approaches. Clin. Kidney J. 2021, 14, i16–i22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Diagnostics 12 01108 g001 550
Figure 1. Proposed diagnosis and treatment algorithm of uremic pruritus.
Figure 1. Proposed diagnosis and treatment algorithm of uremic pruritus.
Diagnostics 12 01108 g001
Diagnostics 12 01108 g002 550
Figure 2. Treatment options for uremic pruritus classified by possible targeted etiologies. The bold ones have greater evidence in current literature.
Figure 2. Treatment options for uremic pruritus classified by possible targeted etiologies. The bold ones have greater evidence in current literature.
Diagnostics 12 01108 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cheng, A.-Y.; Wong, L.-S. Uremic Pruritus: From Diagnosis to Treatment. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 1108. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051108

AMA Style

Cheng A-Y, Wong L-S. Uremic Pruritus: From Diagnosis to Treatment. Diagnostics. 2022; 12(5):1108. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051108

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cheng, An-Yu, and Lai-San Wong. 2022. "Uremic Pruritus: From Diagnosis to Treatment" Diagnostics 12, no. 5: 1108. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051108

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop