Identification of Hotspot Mutations in the N Gene of SARS-CoV-2 in Russian Clinical Samples That May Affect the Detection by Reverse Transcription-PCR
1
Federal State Budget Institution “National Research Centre for Epidemiology and Microbiology Named after Honorary Academician N.F. Gamaleya” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 123098 Moscow, Russia
2
OOO “DNA-Technology”, 117587 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2022, 12(1), 147; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010147
Submission received: 8 December 2021
/
Revised: 28 December 2021
/
Accepted: 4 January 2022
/
Published: 8 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease)
Abstract
:Sensitive and reliable diagnostic test systems based on real-time PCR are of great importance in the fight against the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The genetic variability of the SARS-CoV-2 virus leads to the accumulation of mutations, some of which may affect the sensitivity of modern PCR assays. The aim of this study was to search in Russian clinical samples for new mutations in SARS-CoV-2 gene N that can affect the detection by RT-PCR. In this study, the polymorphisms in the regions of the target gene N causing failed or poor detection of the target N in the RT-PCR assay on 12 selected samples were detected. Sequencing the entire N and E genes in these samples along with other 195 samples that were positive for both target regions was performed. Here, we identified a number of nonsynonymous mutations and one novel deletion in the N gene that affected the ability to detect a target in the N gene as well a few mutations in the E gene of SARS-CoV-2 that did not affect detection. Sequencing revealed that majority of the mutations in the N gene were located in the variable region between positions 193 and 235 aa, inside and nearby the phosphorylated serine-rich region of the protein N. This study highlights the importance of the further characterization of the genetic variability and evolution of gene N, the most common target for detecting SARS-CoV-2. The use of at least two targets for detecting SARS-CoV-2, including one for the E gene, will be necessary for reliable diagnostics.
1. Introduction
The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, is still a major threat to health. In the laboratory testing for detecting SARS-CoV-2, reverse transcriptase real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) assays have played a pivotal role in combating the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (SARS-COVID-19) spread. Since the start of the COVID-19 outbreak, various RT-qPCR assays have been developed. Commercial assays targeting mainly SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N), small envelope (E), and RdRp genes have been developed [1].
Gene N is the most commonly used SARS-CoV-2 detection target for viral diagnosis [2,3]. The nucleocapsid protein (N) involved in the viral assembly, replication, and regulation of host immune response plays important roles in the viral life cycle. The N protein is 419 amino acid (aa) long and composed of three distinct domains: an N-terminal domain (NTD)/RNA-binding domain (46–176 aa), a serine/arginine-rich (SR-rich; 184–204 aa) linker region (LKR; 182–247 aa), and a C-terminal domain (CTD; 247–364 aa) [4]. The targets for the detection of the N gene were introduced to all three domains. Gene N is expressed at a high level compared with other viral protein genes after infection with SARS-CoV-2 [5], which also makes it a preferred target for the detection of SARS-CoV-2.
The multifunctional E protein is the smallest of the structural proteins encoded by the SARS-CoV-2 genome [6]. It is abundantly expressed inside the infected cell; however, only a small portion is incorporated into the virion envelope [7,8]. E protein monomers form pentameric ion channels similar to viroporins. The highly conserved E protein possesses a C-terminal PDZ-binding motif that induces immunopathology by overexpression of inflammatory cytokines [9]. These features of the E protein play a critical role in the exacerbated immune response, causing acute respiratory syndrome, the leading cause of death in SARS-CoV-2 [10]. Therefore, the E protein appears to be an attractive target for SARS-CoV-2 detection.
The genetic variability of the SARS-CoV-2 virus leads to the accumulation of mutations in the target regions used in modern diagnostic test systems for detecting SARS-CoV-2. In particular, it was noted that the N gene is one of the most nonconserved genes in the SARS-CoV-2 genome, and it accumulates a larger number of mutations, whereas the gene encoded envelope protein is mostly conserved [10,11,12,13]. The N and E gene assays are recommended by the WHO for first-line screening of COVID-19 cases [14,15], and are applied in many countries, including Russia. For example, DNA-Technology (Moscow, Russia) targets the SARS-specific sequences in the N and E genes.
Here, we report the identification of a number of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the N gene of SARS-CoV-2 and single deletion in 12 Russian isolates that were associated with the failure of the qRT-PCR that targets the N gene in the SARS-CoV-2 test (DNA-Technology, Moscow, Russia). As this dual-target assay also detects a region in the E gene, these samples were still correctly identified as SARS-CoV-2 positive. Further sequencing of the entire sequence of the N and E genes of an expanded sample of isolates collected for the period of August 2020 to March 2021 made it possible to reveal the further evolution of the N gene with local accumulation (hotspot) of mutations in the SR region and linker region.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sample Collection and Handling
Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from patients that were admitted to Medical Center Citilab (Moscow, Russia) with presumable SARS-CoV-2 infection between August of 2020 and March of 2021. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Nasopharyngeal swabs were immersed into viral transport medium (STOR-F) immediately after sample collection. Samples were stored at 4 °C until testing.
2.2. Nucleic Acid Extraction
Total nucleic acid was extracted from STOR-F using the Proba-NK-S RNA/DNA extraction kit (DNA-Technology, Moscow, Russia) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Aliquoted nucleic acid and residual samples were stored at −70 °C until further testing with RT-qPCR tests. All samples were tested after one initial freeze–thaw cycle.
2.3. Real-Time Quantitative RT-PCR
Real-time qPCR was performed by using the real-time thermal cycler DTprime (DNA-Technology, Moscow, Russia). Amplification and detection were carried out in 96-well plates, applying SARS-CoV-2/SARS-CoV assay (DNA-Technology, Moscow, Russia), which targets genes E and N of SARS-CoV-2 according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The reaction mix utilizes a 10 μL template and a 15 μL master mix. The detection limit of the kit is 10 copies per 25 μL reaction mix. Briefly, 10 μL of extracted RNA was added to 15 μL of Real-time One-step Buffer and 2019-nCoV Oligo Mix and 0.5 μL of Real-time One-step Enzyme. The amplification conditions consisted of an initial reverse transcription at 35 °C for 20 min, followed by PCR activation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 5 cycles of 10 s at 95 °C and 10 s at 64 °C and then 45 cycles of 5 s at 94 °C and 10 s at 64 °C. The result was analyzed using a cycle threshold value (Ct-value) < 40 for all target genes defined as a positive result. The negative RT-qPCR result was set as a Ct value equal to 40.
2.4. Sanger Sequencing
We sequenced the entire N gene in 207 samples by Sanger sequencing. cDNA was prepared using a SuperScript IV RT cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (Invitrogen), Waltham, MA, USA). Gene N was amplified using 3 sets of primers generating amplicon lengths of about 500 nts with 50 nt overlaps. The sequencing primers of set 1 for the N gene are the following: CovNg-1F 5′-CATGACGTTCGTGTTGTTTTAGAT-3′, CovNg-1R 5′-GCCAATGTGATCTTTTGGTGTATT-3′. Set 2 for the N gene: CovNg-2F 5′-GAATACACCAAAAGATCACATTGGCA-3′, CovNg-2R 5′-TCCTTGTCTGATTAGTTCCTGGTCC-3′. Set 3 for the N gene: CovNg-3F 5′-AAACGTACTGCCACTAAAGCATACA-3′, CovNg-3R 5′-TTATATAGCCCATCTGCCTTGTGT-3′. Gene E was amplified, applying 1 set of primers as follows: CovEg-F 5′-GACTACTAGCGTGCCTTTGTAAGC-3′, CovEg-R 5′-CTGCCATGGCTAAAATTAAAGTTC-3′. Taq DNA Polymerase High Fidelity (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (Invitrogen), Waltham, MA, USA) was used. The sequence of the Wuhan-Hu-1 SARS-CoV-2 isolate was used as the reference genome (NCBI GenBank NC_045512.2). Sequencing was performed using a BigDye™ Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (Invitrogen), Waltham, MA, USA). All procedures were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
3. Results
3.1. PCR and Sequencing Analysis of 12Russian Isolates with the Failure of Detection in the N Gene
In total, over 9800 samples were tested using the DNA-Technology test system for the period of August 2020 to March 2021, of which 574 (5.9%) were SARS-CoV-2 positive. Among them, 12 positive samples showed conflicting results on the simultaneous detection of genes N and E on the target. Three samples were detected as positive for the E gene, the threshold cycle value Cp = 22.8, 25.6, and 28.2, respectively, and were not detected for N. In the remaining samples, the value of the threshold cycle Cp for the target N exceeded Cp for E in the range of 3.7–5.6 cycles (Table 1). Thus, it was suggested that there were possible polymorphisms in the N gene detection site both in the nucleotide sequences of the primers and in the area complementary to the hybridization probe.
To elucidate negative results for the N gene in the assay, we performed the viral target sequencing with a focus on the analysis of the N and E genes for all samples used in this study. The entire nucleotide sequence of the N and E genes of these samples was sequenced. All 12 samples belonged to the B.1.1(20GR) clade, because they carried the triple mutation GGG28881-28883AAC in the N gene, which did not affect the detection of the test system at the target N. The most common mutation was at position G28851C/T, resulting in the S193T/I amino acid substitution. This mutation was detected in 6 samples, including G28851C in 5 samples and G28851T in 1 sample (Table 1). Sequencing revealed that the G28851C/T mutation falls into the 3′region of the forward primer that significantly impairs the detection of the target N of the DNA-Technology test system. In 2 samples undetected for the target N, this mutation was detected together with either the C28905T (A211V) mutation or the C28905T (A211V) and G28376A (A35T) double mutations. In addition, the C28905T (A211V) mutation was detected in 2 other samples. The mutation C28905T (A211V) was mapped in the region of probe hybridization that also leads to the deterioration of detection by the target N. The most interesting was the sample with several mutations, including point mutations at positions G28690T (L139F), A28858G (R195R), G28975T (M234I), and deletion del28896–28919, causing in-frame reduction of 8 amino acid residues, A208—G215. The deletion occurred at the complementation site of the hybridization probe, causing a complete absence of detection by the target N. In addition, a single G28916A mutation causing the G215S amino acid substitution was found in 2 samples with impaired detection for the N gene. C28909T substitution was also found in 2 other samples, which led to a synonymous mutation in the G212 codon.
Sequencing analysis revealed the presence of mutations in all samples with impaired detection in the N gene, either in the 3′region of the forward primer or in the region complementary to the hybridization probe. Notably, none of these results were reported as false negative by the test platform, because the E gene was amplified properly.
3.2. Sequencing the Entire N and E Genes in 195 Clinical Samples
Sequencing of the entire N gene in 195 samples with adequate detection of N and E targets also revealed the presence of single nucleotide substitutions presented with different frequencies of occurrence: the most frequent mutations, G28975T (M234I), were found in 5 samples (2.6% (5/195)), C28866T (T198I) in 3 samples (1.5% (3/195)), C28887T (T205I) in 3 samples (1.5% (3/195)), G28376A (A35T) in 3 samples (1.5% (3/195)), G28655T (D128Y) in two samples (1.0% (2/195)), and C29250T (P326L) in two samples. Out of 195 samples, 152 (i.e., 77.9%) also carried the mutation GGG28881-28883AAC in the N gene and belonged to the B.1.1.20GR clade. Five samples were identified as B.1.1.7 strain and carried the triple mutation GGG28881-28883AAC along with the mutations GAT28280-28282CTA (D3L) and C28977T (S235F) in gene N. The remaining nonsynonymous and synonymous mutations localized along the entire length of the N gene were found in single samples and are shown in Table 2.
A total of 57 nonsynonymous and 23 synonymous mutations were found, localized in all functional regions of the N gene and in disordered regions. Eight nonsynonymous mutations were mapped to the N-terminal domain (NTD) (46–176 aa), 11 mutations were detected in the C-terminal domain (CTD) (247–364 aa), and 17 mutations were detected in the serine/arginine-rich region (SRD) (184–204 aa), while 11 mutations were found in the linker region (205–246 aa).
Ten and 1 mutations were detected in the 5′ and 3′ disordered regions of the N gene, respectively. Interestingly, no mutations were found in the region of the predicted T-cell epitope between 223 and 231 aa [16]. Summarizing the representation of all detected mutations and their localization in gene N, it was noticed that the main local mutation density (49.1% (28/57)) in Russian isolates was observed in the region between amino acid residues S193 and D235 of gene N (Figure 1).
This hotspot mutation region includes both the “SR-rich region”, between amino acids 184 and 204, which contains phosphorylation sites at positions S197, S202, and T205 [17], and the flanking region of low complexity up to position D235. Interestingly, the single mutations S197L, S202N, and T205I, potential phosphorylation sites in the nucleocapsid protein, were detected in several isolates.
Sequencing of the entire E gene revealed the presence of nonsynonymous mutations in the 5′ region of the gene. Nucleotide substitutions C26261T, causing the S6L mutation, and G26257A (V5I) were found in 7 (3.6% (7/195)) and 4 (2.1% (4/195)) samples, respectively. Interestingly, these mutations were found mainly in the samples with mutations in the N gene at positions S193T/I and A211V and in the sample with the A208—G215 deletion. However, the localization of these mutations outside the region of detection by the target of the E gene did not affect the detecting ability of qPCR.
4. Discussion
It was previously noted that the genetic variability of the SARS-CoV-2 virus leads to the accumulation of mutations, including the regions of the main target genes, N and E, used in modern diagnostic test systems for detecting SARS-CoV-2 [18,19,20]. In particular, it was noted that the N gene, the most commonly used SARS-CoV-2 detection target, is one of the most non-conserved genes in the SARS-CoV-2 genome [21]. Sequencing of the entire N and E genes of SARS-CoV-2 from 12 isolates of SARS-CoV-2 from Moscow and the Moscow Region, which showed dubious signals or failure of detection for the N gene by testing with the SARS-CoV-2 assay (DNA-Technology, Moscow, Russia), revealed the presence of mutations both in the complementation regions with the forward primer and in the hybridization probe in the N gene, but not in the E gene.
Our data confirm that in places with a high level of SARS-CoV-2 infection rate, such as Moscow and the Moscow Region, and due to the high transmissibility of the virus and the spread of novel variants with mutations in a primer or probe location, the effectiveness of RT-PCR could be impaired. Several mutations in the binding sites of the target primers or probes in the N gene of SARS-CoV-2/SARS-CoV in almost all used diagnostic test systems for SARS-CoV-2 with the detection of gene N have been reported [13,22,23,24]. That leads to a decrease in the sensitivity of the assay and potentially underestimated diagnostics if only one detection target is used. To help prevent false-negative results in the diagnostic assay due to point mutations or deletions/insertions, continuous mismatch monitoring by sequencing and routine use of at least two SARS-CoV-2 targets should be performed.
Sequencing of 195 SARS-CoV-2 samples with adequate detection of targets in genes N and E collected from August 2020 to March 2021 revealed a number of additional mutations, their frequency and localization, and further evolution of the N gene in clade B.1.1. isolates with the double mutation R203K and G204R.
Although mutations were found through the entire length and in all structural domains in the N gene, the main accumulation of nonsynonymous mutations (49.1% (28/57)) in Russian isolates occurred in the region between amino acid residues S193 and S235 of the N protein. The most common mutations in the N (S193T/I, T198I, T205I, A211V, G215S) and the del28896—28919 (A208—G215) deletion identified in this study are located within the SR-rich region (184-204 aa) and part of the intrinsically unstructured linker region. This mutation-enriched region overlaps a predicted B-cell epitope, suggesting positive selection for immune system avoidance as reported [25]. Besides nonsynonymous mutations in the previously identified phosphorylation sites, S197, S202, and T205 were found in several isolates [26]. Another region with the highest mutation density (M234I, S235F, G238C) was found within the unstructured linker region of the nucleocapsid protein and adjoining the CTD domain. Another region with a significant mutation density was the unstructured region between 3 and 35 aa, where mutations in positions A35T, P13L, and D3L were found. The latter mutation along with S235F was detected in five isolates identified as the British strain B.1.1.7.
The detection of mutations in the two indicated regions of the N gene (5′ unstructured and linker) and their accumulation in Russian isolates reflects further evolution of the B.1.1 lineage with the formation of new variants, such as the recently reported B.1.1.317 (N: A211V) and B.1.1.397 (N: M234I) [27] and a novel variant (N: S193T and A35T).
The majority of the mutations in gene N identified in this study were not unique and were found to belong to lineages of clade B.1.1 of various geographic origins [12]. However, the detected mutation patterns are characteristic of the B.1.1 lineages of the Russian origin.
Another feature was the identification a short sequence 221–231 aa in the linker between the regions with a high mutation density, which was still intact to mutation. This region presumably corresponds to the sequence of the predicted T-cell epitope (222–231 aa) [16], which suggests so far the lack of possible escape mutations that cause escape from CD8 T-cell response.
Here, a reported deletion of 24 nucleotides causing in-frame loss of eight amino acid residues (A208—G215) was unique and the only one among the samples of Russian isolates. Similar deletions of 12 nucleotides in size with a loss of four amino acid residues (206–210 aa) are rare, as previously reported in six American isolates [28]. The deletion affects one of the two predicted in silico motifs of the conserved N-myristoylation site (GDAAL). This modification of viral proteins causes their localization in areas of the cell membrane by binding to lipid fragments with the N-terminal glycine site [29]. The occurring N gene deletion may have a significant impact on the interaction of the nucleocapsid protein and host proteins and viral pathogenesis.
Our results imply continuous evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 N gene with accumulation of mutations mainly in two regions, namely, in the linker region and the unstructured region 5′of the N.
Our study has some limitations. First, a functional study of the identified point and deletion mutations was not performed. Second, epidemiological information of all SARS-CoV-2 samples collected in Moscow and the Moscow Region and used in this study was lacking. Third, the number of isolates was limited, and sequencing data for genes N and E were obtained to compare with samples that showed questionable signals or no detection of the gene N. For these reasons, studies that further investigate the frequency of the novel mutations in Russia and worldwide will be of practical importance for the accurate diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2.
5. Conclusions
Genetic variability and further evolution of the N gene with possible accumulation of mutations in certain regions, primarily in the unstructured linker region and the 5′region of the gene, may cause some false-negative results. The emergence of novel SARS-CoV-2 variants with novel mutations, particularly in gene N, may deteriorate detection by RT-PCR assays based on a single gene target. The use of at least two targets for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, including the more conserved gene E, provides higher diagnostic sensitivity. Our findings may also help to better understand viral pathogenesis and the evolution of individual viral genes during the current COVID-19 pandemic.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, S.A.K.; methodology, S.A.K. and T.A.L.; software, M.V.K. and T.A.L.; validation, S.A.K. and T.A.L.; formal analysis, S.A.K., T.A.L. and M.V.K.; investigation, T.A.L.; resources, S.A.K. and A.P.S.; data curation, S.A.K. and T.A.L.; writing—original draft preparation, S.A.K. and M.V.K.; writing—review and editing, S.A.K. and M.V.K.; visualization, S.A.K. and M.V.K.; supervision, A.P.S.; project administration, S.A.K.; funding acquisition, A.P.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Van Kasteren, P.B.; van der Veer, B.; van den Brink, S.; Wijsman, L.; de Jonge, J.; van den Brandt, A.; Molenkamp, R.; Reusken, C.B.E.M.; Meijer, A. Comparison of seven commercial RT-PCR diagnostic kits for COVID-19. J. Clin. Virol. 2020, 128, 104412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peng, Y.; Du, N.; Lei, Y.; Dorje, S.; Qi, J.; Luo, T.; Gao, G.F.; Song, H. Structures of the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and their perspectives for drug design. EMBO J. 2020, 39, e105938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dutta, N.K.; Mazumdar, K.; Gordy, J.T. The nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV-2: A target for vaccine development. J. Virol. 2020, 94, e00647-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zeng, W.; Liu, G.; Ma, H.; Zhao, D.; Yang, Y.; Liu, M.; Mohammed, A.; Zhao, C.; Yang, Y.; Xie, J.; et al. Biochemical characterization of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 527, 618–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, R.J.; Zhao, L.; Huang, B.Y.; Ye, F.; Wang, W.L.; Tan, W.J. Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay panel for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and its variants. Chin. Med. J. Engl. 2021, 134, 2048–2053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hoque, M.N.; Chaudhury, A.; Akanda, M.A.M.; Hossain, M.A.; Islam, M.T. Genomic diversity and evolution, diagnosis, prevention, and therapeutics of the pandemic COVID-19 disease. PeerJ 2020, 8, e9689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Venkatagopalan, P.; Daskalova, S.M.; Lopez, L.A.; Dolezal, K.A.; Hogue, B.G. Coronavirus envelope (E) protein remains at the site of assembly. Virology 2015, 478, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M.S.; Hoque, M.N.; Islam, M.R.; Islam, I.; Mishu, I.D.; Rahaman, M.M.; Sultana, M.; Hossain, M.A. Mutational insights into the envelope protein of SARS-CoV-2. Gene Rep. 2021, 22, 100997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toto, A.; Ma, S.; Malagrin, F.; Visconti, L.; Pagano, L.; Stromgaard, K.; Gianni, S. Comparing the binding properties of peptides mimicking the envelope protein of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 to the PDZ domain of the tight junction-associated PALS1 protein. Protein Sci. 2020, 29, 2038–2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- De Maio, F.; Lo Cascio, E.; Babini, G.; Sali, M.; Della Longa, S.; Tilocca, B.; Roncada, P.; Arcovito, A.; Sanguinetti, M.; Scambia, G.; et al. Improved binding of SARS-CoV-2 Envelope protein to tight junction-associated PALS1 could play a key role in COVID-19 pathogenesis. Microbes Infect. 2020, 22, 592–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Majumdar, P.; Niyogi, S. SARS-CoV-2 mutations: The biological trackway towards viral fitness. Epidemiol. Infect. 2021, 149, e110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, S.; Islam, R.; Alam, R.; Islam, I.; Hoque, N.; Akter, S.; Rahaman, M.M.; Sultana, M.; Hossain, M.A. Evolutionary dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein and its consequences. J. Med. Virol. 2021, 93, 2177–2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ziegler, K.; Steininger, P.; Ziegler, R.; Steinmann, J.; Korn, K.; Ensser, A. SARS-CoV-2 samples may escape detection because of a single point mutation in the N gene. Eurosurveillance 2020, 25, 2001650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corman, V.M.; Landt, O.; Kaiser, M.; Molenkamp, R.; Meijer, A.; Chu, D.K.; Bleicker, T.; Brünink, S.; Schneider, J.; Schmidt, M.L.; et al. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Eurosurveillance 2020, 25, 2000045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mathuria, J.P.; Yadav, R.; Rajkumar. Laboratory diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2—A review of current methods. J. Infect. Public Health 2020, 13, 901–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cun, Y.; Li, C.; Shi, L.; Sun, M.; Dai, S.; Sun, L.; Shi, L.; Yao, Y. COVID-19 coronavirus vaccine T cell epitope prediction analysis based on distributions of HLA class I loci (HLA-A, -B, -C) across global populations. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 2021, 17, 1097–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bouhaddou, M.; Memon, D.; Meyer, B.; White, K.M.; Rezelj, V.V.; Correa Marrero, M. The global phosphorylation landscape of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cell 2020, 182, 685–712.e19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gand, M.; Vanneste, K.; Thomas, I.; Van Gucht, S.; Capron, A.; Herman, P.; Roosens, N.H.C.; De Keersmaecker, S.C.J. Deepening of In Silico Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Detection RT-qPCR Assays in the Context of New Variants. Genes 2021, 12, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Artesi, M.; Bontems, S.; Göbbels, P.; Franckh, M.; Maes, P.; Boreux, R.; Meex, C.; Melin, P.; Hayette, M.P.; Bours, V.; et al. A Recurrent Mutation at Position 26340 of SARS-CoV-2 Is Associated with Failure of the E Gene Quantitative Reverse Transcription-PCR Utilized in a Commercial Dual-Target Diagnostic Assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2020, 58, e01598-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, R.; Hozumi, Y.; Yin, C.; Wei, G.W. Mutations on COVID-19 diagnostic targets. Genomics 2020, 112, 5204–5213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nalla, A.K.; Casto, A.M.; Huang, M.W.; Perchetti, G.A.; Sampoleo, R.; Shrestha, L.; Wei, Y.; Zhu, H.; Jerome, K.R.; Greninger, A.L. Comparative Performance of SARS-CoV-2 Detection Assays Using Seven Different Primer-Probe Sets and One Assay Kit. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2020, 58, e00557-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fox-Lewis, S.; Fox-Lewis, A.; Harrower, J.; Chen, R.; Wang, J.; de Ligt, J.; McAuliffe, G.; Taylor, S.; Smit, E. Lack of N2-gene amplification on the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay and potential novel causative mutations: A case series from Auckland, New Zealand. IDCases 2021, 25, e01233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hasan, M.R.; Sundararaju, S.; Manickam, C.; Mirza, F.; Al-Hail, H.; Lorenz, S.; Tang, P. A novel point mutation in the N gene of SARS-CoV-2 may affect the detection of the virus by RT-qPCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2021, 59, e03278-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vanaerschot, M.; Mann, S.A.; Webber, J.T.; Kamm, J.; Bell, S.M.; Bell, J.; Hong, S.N.; Nguyen, M.P.; Chan, L.Y.; Bhatt, K.D.; et al. Identification of a polymorphism in the N gene of SARS-CoV-2 that adversely impacts detection by reverse transcription-PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2020, 59, e02369-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jungreis, I.; Sealfon, R.; Kellis, M. SARS-CoV-2 gene content and COVID-19 mutation impact by comparing 44 Sarbecovirus genomes. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peng, T.Y.; Lee, K.R.; Tarn, W.Y. Phosphorylation of the arginine/serine dipeptide-rich motif of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus nucleocapsid protein modulates its multimerization, translation inhibitory activity and cellular localization. FEBS J. 2008, 275, 4152–4163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kozlovskaya, L.; Piniaeva, A.; Ignatyev, G.; Selivanov, A.; Shishova, A.; Kovpak, A.; Gordeychuk, I.; Ivin, Y.; Berestovskaya, A.; Prokhortchouk, E.; et al. Isolation and phylogenetic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 variants collected in Russia during the COVID-19 outbreak. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 99, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.; Won, D.; Kim, C.K.; Ahn, J.; Lee, Y.; Na, H.; Kim, Y.T.; Lee, M.K.; Choi, J.R.; Lim, H.S.; et al. Novel indel mutation in the N gene of SARS-CoV-2 clinical samples that were diagnosed positive in a commercial RT-PCR assay. Virus Res. 2021, 297, 198398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maurer-Stroh, S.; Eisenhaber, B.; Eisenhaber, F. N-terminal N-myristoylation of proteins: Refinement of the sequence motif and its taxon-specific differences. J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 317, 523–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1.
Mutation spectra of the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein in the Russian isolates. (A) AA mutation distribution per 20 aa in amino acid strains through the N protein. (B) Local alignment of the SR-rich and linker region of the N protein with mutation mapping. NTD, N-terminal RNA binding domain; SR, serine/arginine-rich domain; CTD, C-terminal dimerization domain; Tc-epitope, predictive T-cell epitope. Nonsynonymous mutations are highlighted in yellow; synonymous mutations are highlighted in white.
Figure 1.
Mutation spectra of the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein in the Russian isolates. (A) AA mutation distribution per 20 aa in amino acid strains through the N protein. (B) Local alignment of the SR-rich and linker region of the N protein with mutation mapping. NTD, N-terminal RNA binding domain; SR, serine/arginine-rich domain; CTD, C-terminal dimerization domain; Tc-epitope, predictive T-cell epitope. Nonsynonymous mutations are highlighted in yellow; synonymous mutations are highlighted in white.
Table 1.
Summary of RT-PCR assay and sequencing data obtained from the samples with polymorphisms in the N gene-affected N gene detection.
Table 1.
Summary of RT-PCR assay and sequencing data obtained from the samples with polymorphisms in the N gene-affected N gene detection.
| Sample | Test Data | RT-PCR, Cp | Detected Mutations * | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene E | Gene N | Gene E | Gene N | ||||
| Nucleotide | Amino Acid | Nucleotide | Amino Acid | ||||
| AK-1 | 06.10.20 | 27.0 | 31.7 | C26261T | S6L | G28851C C28909T | S193T G212G |
| AK-2 | 06.10.20 | 25.8 | 29.6 | G26257A | V5I | G28851C | S193T |
| AK-3 | 08.10.20 | 26.1 | 29.9 | C26261T | S6L | C28905T | A211V |
| AK-4 | 06.11.20 | 25.6 | n/d ** | n/d | n/d | G28851C C28905T | S193T A211V |
| AK-5 | 06.11.20 | 24.9 | n/d | n/d | n/d | G28376A G28851C C28905T | A35T S193T A211V |
| AK-6 | 06.11.20 | 28.2 | 33.8 | C26261T | S6L | G28851C C28909T | S193T G212G |
| AK-7 | 06.11.20 | 27.3 | 31.5 | n/d | n/d | G28851T | S193I |
| AK-8 | 12.01.21 | 25.7 | 29.6 | n/d | n/d | G28916A | G215S |
| AK-16 | 10.11.20 | 26.4 | 30.5 | n/d | n/d | C28905T | A211V |
| AK-10 | 24.12.20 | 24.0 | n/d | C26261T | S6L | del 28896-28919 G28690T A28858G G28975T | A208-G215 L139F R195 M234I |
| AK-11 | 12.01.21 | 25.3 | 29.6 | n/d | n/d | G28916A | G215S |
| AK-12 | 15.02.21 | 27.8 | 31.7 | n/d | n/d | C28909T | G212G |
* Nonsynonymous and synonymous mutations in genes N and E; ** n/d—no change detected.
Table 2.
Summary of sequencing data obtained from the Russian samples with polymorphisms in the E and N genes.
Table 2.
Summary of sequencing data obtained from the Russian samples with polymorphisms in the E and N genes.
| Sample | Test Data | Detected Mutations | Gene N Region * | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene E | Gene N | |||||
| Nucleotide | Amino Acid | Nucleotide | Amino Acid | |||
| M002 | 06.09.20 | n/d ** | n/d | C28866T | T198I | SR |
| M005 | 07.09.20 | n/d | n/d | G28985T | G238C | LKR |
| M008 | 12.09.20 | n/d | n/d | C28887T | T205I | LKR |
| M009 | 12.09.20 | n/d | n/d | C28887T | T205I | LKR |
| M022 | 15.09.20 | n/d | n/d | G28975T | M234I | LKR |
| M024 | 18.09.20 | n/d | n/d | C28866T | T198I | SR |
| M033 | 22.09.20 | C26261T | S6L | C28863T | S197L | SR |
| M038 | 03.10.20 | n/d | n/d | G28857T | R195I | SR |
| M042 | 09.10.20 | n/d | n/d | G28878A | S202N | SR |
| M044 | 09.10.20 | n/d | n/d | C28866T | T198I | SR |
| M047 | 09.10.20 | n/d | n/d | G28655T | D128Y | NTD |
| M051 | 11.10.20 | n/d | n/d | G29024T | A251S | CTD |
| M068 | 15.10.20 | n/d | n/d | C28830T | S186F | SR |
| M071 | 15.10.20 | n/d | n/d | G28655T | D128Y | NTD |
| AK-9 | 09.12.20 | n/d | n/d | G28975T | M234I | LKR |
| AK-18 | 11.12.20 | C26261T | S6L | G28376A | A35T | 5′DLR |
| AK-23 | 11.12.20 | n/d | n/d | G28975T C28651T | M234I N126 | LKR NTD |
| AK-26 | 11.12.20 | G26257A | V5I | C29095T C29218T | F274 F315 | CTD CTD |
| AK-31 | 14.12.20 | n/d | n/d | G28975T | M234I | LKR |
| AK-32 | 14.12.20 | n/d | n/d | G28655T | D128Y | NTD |
| AK-37 | 14.12.20 | n/d | n/d | G28975T | M234I | LKR |
| AK-39 | 14.12.20 | n/d | n/d | C28697T | P142S | NTD |
| AK-41 | 15.12.20 | n/d | n/d | C28887T G28195T | T205I N140K | LKR NTD |
| AK-46 | 17.12.20 | n/d | n/d | G28985T | G238C | LKR |
| AK-49 | 17.12.20 | n/d | n/d | G29024T | A251S | CTD |
| AK-56 | 18.12.20 | n/d | n/d | G28878A | S202N | SR |
| AK-57 | 18.12.20 | n/d | n/d | G28376A | A35T | 5′DLR |
| AK-72 | 14.01.21 | n/d | n/d | C28755T | L161F | NTD |
| AK-77 | 14.01.21 | n/d | n/d | C28775T | P168S | NTD |
| AK-81 | 14.01.21 | n/d | n/d | C28311T | P13L | 5′DLR |
| AK-84 | 14.01.21 | n/d | n/d | C29250T | P326L | CTD |
| AK-85 | 14.01.21 | n/d | n/d | C29153A | Q294K | CTD |
| AK-92 | 15.01.21 | n/d | n/d | G29315C | D348H | CTD |
| AK-97 | 15.01.21 | n/d | n/d | C28826T C29463T | R185C A397V | SR 3′DLR |
| AK-104 | 15.01.21 | n/d | n/d | C29067T | T265I | CTD |
| AK-113 | 16.01.21 | n/d | n/d | G28376A | A35T | 5′DLR |
| AK-118 | 16.01.21 | n/d | n/d | C29095T | F274F | CTD |
| AK-124 | 16.01.21 | n/d | n/d | G29148C | I292T | CTD |
| AK-135 | 16.01.21 | n/d | n/d | C29250T | P326L | CTD |
| AK-143 | 16.01.21 | n/d | n/d | C29149T | I292I | CTD |
| BB ***-12 | 22.01.21 | n/d | n/d | 28280GAT>CTA C28977T | D3L S235F | 5′DLR LKR |
| BB-28 | 26.02.21 | n/d | n/d | 28280GAT>CTA C28977T | D3L S235F | 5′DLR LKR |
| BB-31 | 26.02.21 | n/d | n/d | 28280GAT>CTA C28977T | D3L S235F | 5′DLR LKR |
| BB-37 | 26.02.21 | n/d | n/d | 28280GAT>CTA C28977T | D3L S235F | 5′DLR LKR |
| BB-37 | 03.03.21 | n/d | n/d | 28280GAT>CTA C28977T | D3L S235F | 5′DLR LKR |
* NTD—N-terminal domain, CTD—C-terminal domain, SR—serine/arginine-rich region, LKR—unstructured linker region, 5′DLR and 3′DLR—5′- and 3′-disordered regions of N gene; ** n/d—no change detected; *** BB—strain B.1.1.7.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Kiryanov, S.A.; Levina, T.A.; Konopleva, M.V.; Suslov, A.P. Identification of Hotspot Mutations in the N Gene of SARS-CoV-2 in Russian Clinical Samples That May Affect the Detection by Reverse Transcription-PCR. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 147. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010147
AMA Style
Kiryanov SA, Levina TA, Konopleva MV, Suslov AP. Identification of Hotspot Mutations in the N Gene of SARS-CoV-2 in Russian Clinical Samples That May Affect the Detection by Reverse Transcription-PCR. Diagnostics. 2022; 12(1):147. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010147
Chicago/Turabian StyleKiryanov, Sergei A., Tatiana A. Levina, Maria V. Konopleva, and Anatoly P. Suslov. 2022. "Identification of Hotspot Mutations in the N Gene of SARS-CoV-2 in Russian Clinical Samples That May Affect the Detection by Reverse Transcription-PCR" Diagnostics 12, no. 1: 147. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12010147
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
