Next Article in Journal
Epidemiology of Mucopolysaccharidoses Update
Next Article in Special Issue
Differential Diagnosis between Oral Metastasis of Renal Cell Carcinoma and Salivary Gland Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Serological Test to Determine Exposure to SARS-CoV-2: ELISA Based on the Receptor-Binding Domain of the Spike Protein (S-RBDN318-V510) Expressed in Escherichia coli
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Renal Cell Tumors
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 11
Issue 2
10.3390/diagnostics11020272
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Clinical Implications of (Pro)renin Receptor (PRR) Expression in Renal Tumours

by
Jon Danel Solano-Iturri
1,2,3,
Enrique Echevarría
4,
Miguel Unda
5,
Ana Loizaga-Iriarte
5,
Amparo Pérez-Fernández
5,
Javier C. Angulo
6,
José I. López
3,7 and
Gorka Larrinaga
3,4,8,*
1
Department of Pathology, Donostia University Hospital, 20014 Donostia/San Sebastian, Spain
2
Department of Medical-Surgical Specialities, Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 48940 Leioa, Spain
3
Biocruces-Bizkaia Health Research Institute, 48903 Barakaldo, Spain
4
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 48940 Leioa, Spain
5
Department of Urology, Basurto University Hospital, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 48013 Bilbao, Spain
6
Clinical Department. Faculty of Medical Sciences. European University of Madrid, 28905 Getafe, Spain
7
Department of Pathology, Cruces University Hospital, 48903 Barakaldo, Spain
8
Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 48940 Leioa, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2021, 11(2), 272; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11020272
Submission received: 7 December 2020 / Revised: 5 February 2021 / Accepted: 8 February 2021 / Published: 10 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Diagnostic and Predictive Strategies in Renal Cell Tumors)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
(1) Background: Renal cancer is one of the most frequent malignancies in Western countries, with an unpredictable clinical outcome, partly due to its high heterogeneity and the scarcity of reliable biomarkers of tumour progression. (Pro)renin receptor (PRR) is a novel receptor of the renin–angiotensin system (RAS) that has been associated with the development and progression of some solid tumours by RAS-dependent and -independent mechanisms. (2) Methods: In this study, we analysed the immunohistochemical expression of PRR at the centre and border in a series of 83 clear-cell renal cell (CCRCCs), 19 papillary (PRCC) and 7 chromophobe (ChRCC) renal cell carcinomas, and the benign tumour renal oncocytoma (RO, n = 11). (3) Results: PRR is expressed in all the tumour subtypes, with higher mean staining intensity in ChRCCs and ROs. A high expression of PRR at the tumour centre and at the infiltrative front of CCRCC tissues is significantly associated with high grade, tumour diameter, local invasion and stage, and with high mortality risk by UCLA integrated staging system (UISS) scale. (4) Conclusions: These findings indicate that PRR is associated with the development and progression of renal tumours. Its potential as a novel biomarker for RCC diagnosis/prognosis and as a promising therapeutic target should be taken into account in the future.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the most common malignancies in Western Countries [1,2,3]. Nearly half of all cases of RCC are diagnosed in people more than 65 years old [2,4]. The incidence of RCC has been steadily increasing in recent decades, and it is expected that this trend will continue in the future due to the aging population of developed countries [4].
Clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) is by far the most frequent histological subtype of RCCs, accounting for approximately 75–80% of cases, followed by papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) (10–15%) and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC) (5%) [5]. The most commonly accepted origin of CCRCC and PRCC is the proximal convoluted tubule of the nephron. ChRCC shares a common lineage with benign tumor renal oncocytoma (RO) (5%) and both seem to originate from the intercalated cells of the distal nephron [6]. CCRCC is the most aggressive of the RCCs; 30% of patients are metastatic at diagnosis and another 30% of patients with localized disease eventually progress to metastatic disease [5]. A close correlation between some specific genomic signatures and clinical aggressiveness has been detected in recent studies [7], but an easier identification of changes linked to tumour behaviour and clinical outcome is necessary to reach an efficient improvement in the management of CCRCC patients [8]. With this regard, in recent years, novel prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic approaches have been explored. Thus, study of the components of the renin–angiotensin system (RAS) in the context of renal neoplasms and the potential usefulness of drugs that target this peptidergic system has become a promising research field for RCC [9].
The RAS has been traditionally described as a circulating hormone system that regulates cardiovascular and renal function [10]. However, RAS is also locally expressed in several organs and tissues and its paracrine, autocrine, and intracrine signals can regulate long-term biologic processes such as cell growth [9,11]. Thus, the discovery of intrarenal RAS has been crucial to understanding its involvement in non-neoplastic chronic kidney disease [9,12]. For years, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and angiotensin-II receptor (AT1R) inhibitors (ACEis and ARBs) have been widely used in the management of this pathology. The mechanism of action of these drugs is based on the inhibition of the ACE/Ang-II/AT1R axis, which induce cell proliferation, fibrosis and inflammation [9,12].
These phenomena are also part of neoplastic processes and, therefore, the study of RAS and the potential of RAS-targeting therapies has received considerable attention in research into renal cancer [9,11]. Thus, imbalances in components of the intrarenal RAS, such as the up-regulation of AT1Rs in RCC cells and ACE in tumour vessels, have been associated with renal cancer development and progression [13,14,15]. Besides, the use of the abovementioned RAS inhibitors (RASis) has been associated with better response to current treatments and better outcomes of patients with metastatic RCC [16,17,18].
The (pro)renin receptor (PRR) is a novel component of the RAS that was first described in the past decade [19] and that is expressed in several organs and tissues, including the kidney [12]. The most well-known function of this protein is the activation of RAS. PRR binds renin enzyme and its inactive precursor prorenin, which enhances their activity and the production of angiotensin I, which is converted by ACE in angiotensin II, leading to AT1R-mediated signals. PRR is also activated after the binding of (pro)renin, which leads to PI3/AKT/mTOR and MAPK/ERK signalling [12,20,21]. Besides this, PRR is considered to function as a hinge molecule between the Wnt receptor and the V-ATPase that mediates Wnt receptor internalization and the subsequent Wnt/β–catenin signaling [12,21].
These RAS-dependent and -independent signalling pathways contribute to cancer initiation, so it was expected that PRR expression could be altered in tumour tissues [21]. Thus, increases in this protein have been described in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [22,23], glioma [24,25], colorectal [26,27], breast [28] and endometrial cancer [29]. Taking into account that PRR exerts important functions in kidney physiology and that it takes part in inflammatory and fibrotic processes of this organ [12], changes in this protein can also be expected in kidney neoplasms. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) described high mRNA levels of PRR in RCCs when compared with the uninvolved part of the kidney [21]. The Human Protein Atlas (https://www.proteinatlas.org (accessed on 5 February 2021)) described PRR staining in RCCs; however, the analyses were limited to only 11 cases, which was insufficient to understand the association between this protein and tumour progression.
In this study, we analysed PRR immunohistochemical expression in a series of 120 kidney tumours. The series included three subtypes of RCC (CCRCC, PRCC and ChRCC) and the benign tumour RO. Both the centre of the tumour and the infiltration front was analysed to test the possible heterogeneity of PRR expression in these tumours. Since CCRCC is the most frequent RCC [5], we analysed the association between PRR and tumour progression and its impact on the prognosis of CCRCC patients.

2. Materials and Methods

The present study, including all its experiments, comply with current Spanish and European Union legal regulations. The Basque Biobank for Research (OEHUN) (www.biobancovasco.org (accessed on 5 February 2021)) was the source of samples, and the data from employed patients could possibly be used for research purposes. Each patient signed a specific document which was approved by the Ethical and Scientific Committees of the Basque Country Public Health System (Osakidetza) (PI + CES-BIOEF 2018-04).

2.1. Patients

A total of 120 renal tumours, surgically removed at Basurto University Hospital between 2012 and 2016, were collected for the study: 83 CCRCCs (mean age: 61.9 years, 58 males and 25 females), 19 PRCCs (mean age: 53.5 years, 15 males and 4 females), 7 ChRCCs (63.9 years, 6 males and 1 female) and 11 ROs (mean age: 63.4 years, 4 males and 7 females). Samples from the tumour centre and the infiltrating front were included in tissue microarrays (TMAs) for further immunohistochemical analyses. One sample of the uninvolved kidney was also included in each TMA.
Table 1 summarizes the pathological and clinical characteristics of patients with CCRCC. American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) [30] and WHO/ISUP [31] methods were applied to assign tumour, node and metastasis (TNM) Stage and Grade, respectively.

2.2. Immunohistochemistry

Rabbit polyclonal antibody specific for PRR [ref. HPA003156; Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO, USA) at 1/50 dilution] was used for the immunostaining of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumour tissues. The antibody’s specificity was tested previously [27] and the immunostaining process was performed following routine methods in an automatic immunostainer (Dako Autostainer Plus, Dako-Agilent, Santa Clara, California, USA). Briefly, antigen retrieval was carried out in a low-pH buffer (K8005, Dako, Santa Clara, California, USA) for 20 min at 95 °C. The samples were incubated with the primary antibody for 50 min at room temperature. Then, the primary antibody was washed and samples were incubated for 20 min with secondary anti-rabbit antibody (K8021, Dako). EnVision-Flex detection system together with an HRP-enzyme-labelled polymer (SM802, Dako) was employed. A positive reaction was visualized with diaminobenzydine (DAB) solution (DM827, Dako), followed by counterstaining with haematoxylin (K8008, Dako).
Slides were reviewed under light microscopy for staining evaluation. Two observers independently evaluated the slides and, in the event of discrepancies, samples were re-evaluated to arrive at a final conclusion. As previously reported [27], staining patterns were scored as negative, weak and intense cytoplasmic and membranous staining.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was performed with SPSS® 24.0.
We applied a Kolmogorov–Smirnov test to assess if data obtained from tumour tissues followed a normal distribution. Based on this information, data were further analysed using parametric or non-parametric tests.
The correlation between PRR expression in tumour centre and front and patient age and gender was evaluated using Spearman Rho tests. Associations between categorical PRR expression (weak/intense) in renal tumour tissues’ pathological and clinical variables were tested by Chi-square (χ2) test. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) analysis was performed by long-rank test with a cut-off point based on the categorical expression of PRR.

3. Results

3.1. Kidney Tumours Express PRR

The uninvolved part of the kidney showed more intense staining in tubules from the distal nephron than from proximal ones (Figure 1). PRR staining is distributed as cytoplasmic granular staining of renal cells and concentrates close to the cell membrane. This distribution corresponds both to the cell-surface and the cytoplasmic organelles.
Same as has been observed in normal renal tubules, the different subtypes of renal cell carcinomas (CCRCC, PRCC and ChRCC) and RO expressed PRR in the cytoplasm and plasmatic membrane of tumour cells (Figure 2a). Only one case in all the series was PRR negative, so data from IHC analysis are represented by two values: weak and intense.
Nearly half of CCRCCs and PRCCs showed weak staining of PRR, whereas in ChRCC and RO, the staining was mainly intense. Significant differences were found between tumours from distal and proximal nephron both in the centre and tumour front (Figure 2b,c).
We also compared differences in the expression of PRR between the tumour centre and front in each kidney tumour subtype. Both tumour locations showed a similar staining pattern in CCRCC (Chi-square test, p = 0.6), PRCC (p= 0.64), ChRCC (p = 0.3) and RO (p = 0.31).

3.2. PRR Expression in CCRCC Changes Depending on Tumour Aggressiveness

Data from CCRCC tumours were stratified by pathological parameters that were tightly related to tumour aggressiveness such as WHO/ISUP histological grade, tumour necrosis, tumour size, local invasion (pT), the presence/absence of affected lymph nodes (N) and metastases (M), TNM stage and tumour progression (SSIGN scale). The association between PRR and clinical variables such as patients’ sex, age, mortality risk (UISS scale), and 5-year cancer-specific survival was also analysed.
The non-parametric Rho Spearman test was performed to assess if PRR protein expression varies according to the gender or age of the patients. Results showed no statistically significant correlation between PRR and sex (expression in tumour centre: Spearman Rho, r = 0.061, p = 0.58; tumour front: r = −0.01, p = 0.99) and age (expression in tumour centre: r= 0.176, p = 0.11; tumour front: r= 0.183, p = 0.12).

3.2.1. PRR Expression is Higher in High Grade CCRCCs

We stratified cases as low- (G1–G2) and high histological grade (G3–G4). High-grade CCRCCs expressed significantly stronger PRR staining than low-grade tumours, both at the centre and at the infiltrating front (Figure 3).

3.2.2. PRR Staining is Stronger in Large Tumours

CCRCCs were classified in three groups following previously reported classifications [27,32]: tumours with 4 cm or smaller, 4 to 7 cm, and larger than 7 cm. PRR staining was more intense in larger CCRCCs than in small or medium ones. The difference was statistically significant at the centre of the tumour (Figure 4a,b).

3.2.3. PRR Expression is Higher in CCRCCs with Higher Local Invasion (pT)

The series had a limited number of pT4 cases and we stratified local invasion in three groups: pT1 (organ-confined tumours ≤7 cm), pT2 (organ-confined tumours >7 cm) and pT3-pT4 (non-organ-confined tumours). PRR expression at the centre and at the infiltration front of pT2 tumours was significantly higher than in pT1 ones. Non-organ-confined tumours also showed stronger staining of PRR than pT1 ones, with significant results at the tumour centre (Figure 4c,d).

3.2.4. PRR Expression Does Not Vary Significantly in Metastasized and Not Metastasized CCRCCs

Tumours that invaded locorregional lymph nodes (N1) showed a similar trend, towards more intense PRR staining than tumours without lymph node invasion (N0), but data were not statistically significant (at tumour centre, Chi-square p = 0.23; at tumour front, p = 0.33) (Figure 4e,f). Similarly, PRR expression was higher in CCRCCs with distant metastasis (M1) than in tumours without, but not significantly (at tumour centre, Chi-square p = 0.23; at tumour front, p = 0.39) (Figure 4g,h).

3.2.5. PRR Expression is Significantly Higher in High Stage Tumours

CCRCCs were stratified as low-stage (Stage I–II) and advanced- or high-stage (Stages III–IV). PRR staining at the centre of tumours was stronger in advanced than in low-stage CCRCCs (Figure 4i,j).

3.2.6. PRR Expression is Higher in CCRCC Patients with Intermediate and High Mortality Risk (UISS)

We used two validated scales that predict tumour progression and mortality risk of CCRCC patients: the Mayo Clinic stage, size, grade, necrosis (SSIGN) model [33] and the UCLA Integrated Staging System (UISS) model [34]. SSIGN scale was stratified in two groups (low vs. high progression), and UISS was classified in three groups (low vs. intermediate vs. high mortality risk). We also had data of patients’ 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS). The association between SSIGN (Log-rank test, p = 0.026) and UISS scales (Log-rank test, p = 0.013 × 10−5) and 5-year CSS was statistically significant.
PRR at the tumour centre and front showed more intense PRR staining in patients with intermediate and high mortality risk (UISS) than in those with low risk (Figure 5a,b). However, this expression was not associated to the SSIGN scale (PRR at tumour centre, Chi-square test p = 0.23; PRR at tumour front, p = 0.12) (Figure 5c,d), or to the 5-year CSS of these patients (PRR at tumour centre, Log-rank test p = 0.381; PRR at tumour front, p = 0.857).

4. Discussion

RCC is a complex and heterogeneous tumour with only two first-line therapeutic approaches with some efficacy at present: the inhibition of angiogenic pathways by tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and the improvement in anti-tumour immunity by recently included immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) [35]. Clinical data demonstrated that the concomitant use of RASis improves the response to TKI treatment in metastasic RCC patients [16,17,18]. Preclinical studies supported these data, demonstrating a “hypertrophy” of the ACE/AngII/AT1R axis in RCC tissues and proangiogenic and proinvasive effects of AT1R stimulation by AngII [9,13,14,15]. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that AngII/AT1R-signaling contributes to an immunosuppressive microenvironment in different ways and that RASis are promising drugs to improve the response to ICIs [36].
The second most-known axis of the RAS, the ACE2/Ang1-7/Mas axis, counterbalances the actions of AngII. Anti-tumour effects of this axis have been demonstrated in several solid cancers [9,11]; however, its role in RCC development is more controversial [9,11]. On the one hand, it was shown that Ang1-7 induced protumour and proinvasive phenomena in RCC cell lines through Mas/AKT-signalling pathways [37] and that ACE2 protein expression was higher in high-grade CCRCCs [15]. On the other hand, it has recently been described that higher ACE2 mRNA levels in CCRCC are associated with better survival of RCC patients and better response to immunotherapy [38].
The place of PRR in the complex scheme of RAS and renal cancer remains to be determined. As previously reported [12], we observed that this protein is expressed in proximal tubules and in the distal nephron of the uninvolved kidney. Both are topographic origins of the main renal tumours [5] and, as expected, PRR is expressed in three subtypes of RCCs. Besides this, the staining of this protein was more intense in CCRCCs with high histological grade, diameter and stage, and was associated with a higher risk of mortality according to the UISS scale. These results agree with studies carried out in other solid tumours, showing the potential of PRR as a biomarker of worse prognosis [21]. Furthermore, we reported recently that PRR staining was not very different in the centre and front of colorectal cancers [27], a result that was repeated in RCCs. This finding suggests that the intrinsic heterogeneity of these tumours may not affect their analysis, which is favourable for the potential use of PRR as an immunohistochemical prognostic biomarker [27].
The mechanism by which PRR upregulation could affect the progression of kidney could be RAS-dependent or -independent [12,21]. It is known that under pathologic conditions, PRR induces AngII/AT1R-dependent secretion of pro-fibrotic and pro-inflammatory cytokines in cells from the proximal and distal nephron [12]. Treatment with the renin inhibitor aliskiren demonstrated antiproliferative effects of RCC [39]; therefore, it could be hypothesized that the upregulation of PRR could enhance renin activity, contributing to the stimulation of ACE/AngII/AT1R axis in RCC tissues.
The binding of renin or prorenin to PRR can activate the PI3/AKT/mTOR pathway independently of the action of angiotensins [12,21]. This is a well-known oncogenic pathway, which is aberrantly active in CCRCC [40]. Furthermore, PRR is also an important component of the Wnt receptor complex and acts as an adaptor between LRP6 and the V-ATPase. This facilitates the binding of Wnt ligands to the Wnt receptor complex and the activation of the Wnt/β-catenin signalling [12,21] pathway, which is also involved in the pathogenesis of RCC [41]. Recent findings demonstrate that the increased PRR expression can lead to an increase in the activity of these signalling routes in other solid tumours [21], therefore, similar RAS-independent mechanisms should be also taking into account in renal carcinogenetic processes.
PRR can be found in the cell-surface but also in the cytoplasmic organelles. The protein is expressed in the membranes of the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi apparatus, from which it can be released as a soluble isoform (sPRR) after cleaving by ADAM19, furin and Site-1 protease [12,42]. The antibody we used for the IHC analysis detects both membrane-bound and soluble isoforms [42,43]. The sPRR is released to the extracellular space and is found in plasma and urine, where it has been described as a potential diagnostic and/or prognostic indicator of cancer presence and progression [21,22]. PRR is also an essential subunit of vacuolar V-ATPase, a protein complex necessary for the acidification of intracellular compartments (such us lysosomes) and for the regulation of autophagy. This is an important homeostatic phenomenon for neoplastic cells to protect them from intracellular stress, and PRR is also involved in tumour cell proliferation and progression by promoting autophagy [12,21,44,45]. Our data show cytoplasmic granular staining of PRR in RCCs, which could be associated with these intracellular phenomena.
PRR has also been described in benign tumours, such as adrenal [46,47] and colorectal adenomas [27]. In agreement with this, our results showed that PRR was expressed in RO and with the same intensity as in ChRCC, tumours that are histogenetically related [6]. These findings suggest that this protein could induce proliferative but non-invasive signals in some tumours. It should also be noted that, in a previous analysis, we observed that neither ACE nor ACE2 were expressed in RO and ChRCC [15], which suggests that the role of PRR in these tumours could be RAS-independent. The degree to which PRR exerts its RAS-dependent or -independent actions in each kidney tumour subtype and the way in which this affects the onset and progression of the tumour is an issue that needs further investigation.
In summary, this study describes PRR protein in a series of kidney tumours with different topographic origins in the nephron. Furthermore, the results in CCRCCs show that the protein expression is increased in both the centre and the invasive front of the most advanced tumours, as has been observed in other solid tumours [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. Taken together, this evidence indicates that PRR is associated with renal cancer development and progression. Its potential as a novel biomarker for renal cancer diagnosis and prognosis, but also as a promising therapeutic target, should be taken into account in the future [21].

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, G.L., J.I.L. and J.C.A.; data curation, G.L., E.E. and J.D.S.-I.; formal analysis, J.D.S.-I., A.L.-I. and J.I.L.; funding acquisition, G.L., J.C.A. and J.I.L.; investigation, J.D.S.-I., M.U., A.L.-I., A.P.-F. and J.I.L.; methodology, J.D.S.-I. and J.I.L.; project administration, G.L., E.E. and J.I.L.; supervision, G.L., J.C.A. and J.I.L.; writing—original draft, J.D.S.-I. and G.L.; writing—review and editing, G.L., J.D.S.-I., E.E., M.U., A.L.-I., A.P.-F., J.C.A. and J.I.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was funded by the Basque Government (ELKARTEK KK2018-00090 and KK-2020/00069).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The present study including all its experiments comply with current Spanish and European Union legal regulations. The Basque Biobank for Research-OEHUN (www.biobancovasco.org (accessed on 5 February 2021)) was the source of samples and the data from patients employed could possibly be used for research purposes. The study was approved by the Ethical and Scientific Committees of the Basque Country Public Health System (Osakidetza) (PI+CES-BIOEF 2018-04).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Full data will be available from the Corresponding Author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We want to thank to Arantza Pérez Dobaran (UPV/EHU) for her technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2020, 70, 7–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Padala, S.A.; Barsouk, A.; Thandra, K.C.; Saginala, K.; Mohammed, A.; Vakiti, A.; Rawla, P.; Barsouk, A. Epidemiology of Renal Cell Carcinoma. World J. Oncol. 2020, 11, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Esther, J.; Hale, P.; Hahn, A.W.; Agarwal, N.; Maughan, B.L. Treatment Decisions for Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma in Older Patients: The Role of TKIs and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Drugs Aging 2019, 36, 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. MacLennan, G.T.; Cheng, L. Neoplasms of the kidney. In Urologic Surgical Pathology, 3rd ed.; Bostwick, D.G., Cheng, L., Eds.; Saunders: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2014; pp. 76–156. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ng, K.L.; Morais, C.; Bernard, A.; Saunders, N.; Samaratunga, H.; Gobe, G.; Wood, S. A systematic review and meta-analysis of immunohistochemical biomarkers that differentiate chromophobe renal cell carcinoma from renal oncocytoma. J. Clin. Pathol. 2016, 69, 661–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Turajlic, S.; Xu, H.; Litchfield, K.; Rowan, A.; Horswell, S.; Chambers, T.; O’Brien, T.; Lopez, J.I.; Watkins, T.B.; Nicol, D.; et al. Deterministic Evolutionary Trajectories Influence Primary Tumor Growth: TRACERx Renal. Cell 2018, 173, 595–610.e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Semeniuk-Wojtaś, A.; Stec, R.; Szczylik, C.A. Are primary renal cell carcinoma and metastases of renal cell carcinoma the same cancer? Urol. Oncol. Semin. Orig. Investig. 2016, 34, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Sobczuk, P.; Szczylik, C.A.; Porta, C.; Czarnecka, A.M. Renin angiotensin system deregulation as renal cancer risk factor. Oncol. Lett. 2017, 14, 5059–5068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Fyhrquist, F.Y.; Saijonmaa, O. Renin-angiotensin system revisited. J. Intern. Med. 2008, 264, 224–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wegman-Ostrosky, T.; Soto-Reyes, E.; Vidal-Millán, S.; Sánchez-Corona, J. The renin-angiotensin system meets the hallmarks of cancer. J. Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone Syst. 2015, 16, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ichihara, A.; Yatabe, M.S. The (pro)renin receptor in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2019, 15, 693–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Dolley-Hitze, T.; Jouan, F.; Martin, B.; Mottier, S.; Edeline, J.; Moranne, O.; Le Pogamp, P.; Belaud-Rotureau, M.-A.; Patard, J.-J.; Rioux-Leclercq, N.; et al. Angiotensin-2 receptors (AT1-R and AT2-R), new prognostic factors for renal clear-cell carcinoma? Br. J. Cancer 2010, 103, 1698–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Larrinaga, G.; Pérez, I.; Sanz, B.; Blanco, L.; Lopez, J.I.; Candenas, M.L.; Pinto, F.M.; Gil, J.; Irazusta, J.; Varona, A. Angiotensin-converting enzymes (ACE and ACE2) are downregulated in renal tumors. Regul. Pept. 2010, 165, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Errarte, P.; Beitia, M.; Perez, I.; Manterola, L.; Lawrie, C.H.; Solano-Iturri, J.D.; Calvete-Candenas, J.; Unda, M.; López, J.I.; Larrinaga, G. Expression and activity of angiotensin-regulating enzymes is associated with prognostic outcome in clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0181711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Keizman, D.; Huang, P.; Eisenberger, M.A.; Pili, R.; Kim, J.J.; Antonarakis, E.S.; Hammers, H.; Carducci, M.A. Angiotensin system inhibitors and outcome of sunitinib treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A retrospective examination. Eur. J. Cancer 2011, 47, 1955–1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Izzedine, H.; DeRosa, L.; Le Teuff, G.; Albiges, L.; Escudier, B. Hypertension and angiotensin system inhibitors: impact on outcome in sunitinib-treated patients for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Ann. Oncol. 2015, 26, 1128–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. McKay, R.R.; Rodriguez, G.E.; Lin, X.; Kaymakcalan, M.D.; Hamnvik, O.-P.R.; Sabbisetti, V.S.; Bhatt, R.S.; Simantov, R.; Choueiri, T.K. Angiotensin System Inhibitors and Survival Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015, 21, 2471–2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Nguyen, G.; Delarue, F.; Burcklé, C.; Bouzhir, L.; Giller, T.; Sraer, J.-D. Pivotal role of the renin/prorenin receptor in angiotensin II production and cellular responses to renin. J. Clin. Invest. 2002, 109, 1417–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Funke-Kaiser, H.; Zollmann, F.S.; Schefe, J.H.; Unger, T. Signal transduction of the (pro)renin receptor as a novel therapeutic target for preventing end-organ damage. Hypertens. Res. 2009, 33, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, J.; Nishiyama, A.; Matsuyama, M.; Wang, Z.; Yuan, Y. The (pro)renin receptor: a novel biomarker and potential therapeutic target for various cancers. Cell Commun. Signal. 2020, 18, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Shibayama, Y.; Fujimori, T.; Nguyen, G.; Hirose, T.; Totsune, K.; Ichihara, A.; Kitada, K.; Nakano, D.; Kobori, H.; Kohno, M.; et al. (Pro)renin receptor is crucial for Wnt/β-catenin-dependent genesis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Arundhathi, A.; Chuang, W.-H.; Chen, J.-K.; Wang, S.-E.; Shyr, Y.-M.; Chen, J.-Y.; Liao, W.-N.; Chen, H.-W.; Teng, Y.-M.; Pai, C.-C.; et al. Prorenin receptor acts as a potential molecular target for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma diagnosis. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 55437–55448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Juillerat-Jeanneret, L.; Celerier, J.; Chapuis, B.C.; Nguyen, G.; Wostl, W.; Maerki, H.P.; Janzer, R.-C.; Corvol, P.; Gasc, J.-M. Renin and angiotensinogen expression and functions in growth and apoptosis of human glioblastoma. Br. J. Cancer 2004, 90, 1059–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Kouchi, M.; Shibayama, Y.; Ogawa, D.; Miyake, K.; Nishiyama, A.; Tamiya, T. (Pro)renin receptor is crucial for glioma development via the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. J. Neurosurg. 2017, 127, 819–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Wang, J.; Shibayama, Y.; Zhang, A.; Ohsaki, H.; Asano, E.; Suzuki, Y.; Kushida, Y.; Kobara, H.; Masaki, T.; Wang, Z.; et al. (Pro)renin receptor promotes colorectal cancer through the Wnt/beta-catenin signalling pathway despite constitutive pathway component mutations. Br. J. Cancer 2019, 120, 229–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Beitia, M.; Solano-Iturri, J.D.; Errarte, P.; Calvete-Candenas, J.; Loizate, A.; Etxezarraga, M.C.; Sanz, B.; Larrinaga, G. (Pro)renin Receptor Expression Increases throughout the Colorectal Adenoma-Adenocarcinoma Sequence and It Is Associated with Worse Colorectal Cancer Prognosis. Cancers 2019, 11, 881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Ohba, K.; Suzuki, T.; Nishiyama, H.; Kaneko, K.; Hirose, T.; Totsune, K.; Sasano, H.; Takahashi, K. Expression of (pro)renin receptor in breast cancers and its effect on cancer cell proliferation. Biomed. Res. 2014, 35, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Delforce, S.J.; Lumbers, E.R.; De Meaultsart, C.C.; Wang, Y.; Proietto, A.; Otton, G.; Scurry, J.; Verrills, N.M.; Scott, R.J.; Pringle, K.G. Expression of renin–angiotensin system (RAS) components in endometrial cancer. Endocr. Connect. 2017, 6, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Edge, S.B.; Byrd, D.R.; Compton, C.C.; Fritz, A.G.; Greene, F.L.; Trotti, A. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 7th ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  31. Delahunt, B.; Eble, J.N.; Egevad, L.; Samaratunga, H. Grading of renal cell carcinoma. Histopathology 2018, 74, 4–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Siddiqui, S.A.; Frank, I.; Leibovich, B.C.; Cheville, J.C.; Lohse, C.M.; Zincke, H.; Blute, M.L. Impact of tumour size on the predictive ability of the pT3a primary tumour classification for renal cell carcinoma. J. Urol. 2006, 177, 59–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Frank, I.; Blute, M.L.; Cheville, J.C.; Lohse, C.M.; Weaver, A.L.; Zincke, H. An outcome prediction model for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with radical nephrectomy based on tumor stage, size, grade and necrosis: the SSIGN score. J. Urol. 2002, 168, 2395–2400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zisman, A.; Pantuck, A.J.; Dorey, F.; Said, J.W.; Shvarts, O.; Quintana, D.; Gitlitz, B.J.; Dekernion, J.B.; Figlin, R.A.; Belldegrun, A.S. Improved Prognostication of Renal Cell Carcinoma Using an Integrated Staging System. J. Clin. Oncol. 2001, 19, 1649–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chowdhury, N.; Drake, C.G. Kidney Cancer. Urol. Clin. North Am. 2020, 47, 419–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pinter, M.; Jain, R.K. Targeting the renin-angiotensin system to improve cancer treatment: Implications for immunotherapy. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017, 9, eaan5616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Zheng, S.; Yang, Y.; Song, R.; Yang, X.; Liu, H.; Ma, Q.; Yang, L.; Meng, R.; Tao, T.; Wang, S.; et al. Ang-(1-7) promotes the migration and invasion of human renal cell carcinoma cells via Mas-mediated AKT signaling pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 460, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zhang, Z.; Li, L.; Li, M.; Wang, X. The SARS-CoV-2 host cell receptor ACE2 correlates positively with immunotherapy response and is a potential protective factor for cancer progression. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2020, 18, 2438–2444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hu, J.; Zhang, L.-C.; Song, X.; Lu, J.-R.; Jin, Z. KRT6 interacting with notch1 contributes to progression of renal cell carcinoma, and aliskiren inhibits renal carcinoma cell lines proliferation in vitro. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015, 8, 9182–9188. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Sitaram, R.T.; Landström, M.; Roos, G.; Ljungberg, B. Significance of PI3K signalling pathway in clear cell renal cell carcinoma in relation to VHL and HIF status. J. Clin. Pathol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xu, Q.; Krause, M.; Samoylenko, A.; Vainio, S. Wnt Signaling in Renal Cell Carcinoma. Cancers 2016, 8, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Prieto, M.C.; Williams, D.E.; Liu, L.; Kavanagh, K.L.; Mullins, J.J.; Mitchell, K.D. Enhancement of renin and prorenin receptor in collecting duct of Cyp1a1-Ren2 rats may contribute to development and progression of malignant hypertension. Am. J. Physiol. Renal. Physiol. 2011, 300, F581–F588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. González, G.A.; Lara, L.S.; Luffman, C.; Seth, D.M.; Prieto, M.C. The soluble form of the (pro)renin [s(P)RR] is augmented in the collecting duct and urine of chronic angiotensin II-dependent hypertensive rats. Hypertension 2011, 57, 859–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Yoshikawa, A.; Aizaki, Y.; Kusano, K.-I.; Kishi, F.; Susumu, T.; Iida, S.; Ishiura, S.; Nishimura, S.; Shichiri, M.; Senbonmatsu, T. The (pro)renin receptor is cleaved by ADAM19 in the Golgi leading to its secretion into extracellular space. Hypertens. Res. 2011, 34, 599–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Ohba, K.; Endo, M.; Sato, S.; Kashio-Yokota, Y.; Hirose, T.; Takahashi, K. (Pro)renin receptor/ATP6AP2 is required for autophagy and regulates proliferation in lung adenocarcinoma cells. Genes Cells 2020, 25, 782–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Yamamoto, H.; Kaneko, K.; Ohba, K.; Morimoto, R.; Hirose, T.; Satoh, F.; Totsune, K.; Takahashi, K. Increased expression of (pro)renin receptor in aldosterone-producing adenomas. Peptides 2013, 49, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Recarti, C.; Seccia, T.M.; Caroccia, B.; Gonzales-Campos, A.; Ceolotto, G.; Lenzini, L.; Petrelli, L.; Belloni, A.S.; Rainey, W.E.; Nussberger, J.; et al. Expression and functional role of the prorenin receptor in the human adrenocortical zona glomerulosa and in primary aldosteronism. J. Hypertens. 2015, 33, 1014–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Diagnostics 11 00272 g001 550
Figure 1. Immunohistochemical (Pro)renin Receptor (PRR) staining in non-tumour renal tissue. Hematoxylin–Eosin and PRR immunostaining at the uninvolved part of the kidney. Original magnification, ×250. Red arrows point to proximal tubules with weak PRR expression. Blue arrows point to distal nephron tubules with intense PRR staining.
Figure 1. Immunohistochemical (Pro)renin Receptor (PRR) staining in non-tumour renal tissue. Hematoxylin–Eosin and PRR immunostaining at the uninvolved part of the kidney. Original magnification, ×250. Red arrows point to proximal tubules with weak PRR expression. Blue arrows point to distal nephron tubules with intense PRR staining.
Diagnostics 11 00272 g001
Diagnostics 11 00272 g002 550
Figure 2. Immunohistochemical PRR staining in kidney tumours. (a) PRR immunostaining of different tumor subtypes (clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC); papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC); chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC); renal oncocytoma (RO)). Original magnification, ×250. PRR staining intensity both at centre (b) and front (c) of tumours was grouped as weak and intense. ChRCCs and RO showed intense PRR staining, whereas CCRCC and PRCC showed weak staining. Chi-square test was used for data analysis. H&E: Hematoxilin–Eosin.
Figure 2. Immunohistochemical PRR staining in kidney tumours. (a) PRR immunostaining of different tumor subtypes (clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC); papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC); chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC); renal oncocytoma (RO)). Original magnification, ×250. PRR staining intensity both at centre (b) and front (c) of tumours was grouped as weak and intense. ChRCCs and RO showed intense PRR staining, whereas CCRCC and PRCC showed weak staining. Chi-square test was used for data analysis. H&E: Hematoxilin–Eosin.
Diagnostics 11 00272 g002
Diagnostics 11 00272 g003 550
Figure 3. PRR expression according to tumour grade. Immunostaining at the tumour centre of low- and high-grade CCRCCs (a). Original magnification, ×250. H&E: Hematoxilin–Eosin. PRR staining intensity both at centre (b) and front (c) of tumours was grouped as weak and intense. Staining was more intense in high-grade CCRCCs. Chi-square test was used for data analysis.
Figure 3. PRR expression according to tumour grade. Immunostaining at the tumour centre of low- and high-grade CCRCCs (a). Original magnification, ×250. H&E: Hematoxilin–Eosin. PRR staining intensity both at centre (b) and front (c) of tumours was grouped as weak and intense. Staining was more intense in high-grade CCRCCs. Chi-square test was used for data analysis.
Diagnostics 11 00272 g003
Diagnostics 11 00272 g004 550
Figure 4. Immunohistochemical PRR staining according to CCRCC tumour size (a,b), local invasion (pT) (c,d), lymph node (N) (e,f) and distant metastasis (M) (g,h), and TNM Stage (i,j). PRR staining intensity was grouped as weak and intense. Chi-square test was used for data analysis. N0: No lymph node metastasis; N1: lymph node metastasis; M0: No distant metastasis; M1: distant metastasis.
Figure 4. Immunohistochemical PRR staining according to CCRCC tumour size (a,b), local invasion (pT) (c,d), lymph node (N) (e,f) and distant metastasis (M) (g,h), and TNM Stage (i,j). PRR staining intensity was grouped as weak and intense. Chi-square test was used for data analysis. N0: No lymph node metastasis; N1: lymph node metastasis; M0: No distant metastasis; M1: distant metastasis.
Diagnostics 11 00272 g004
Diagnostics 11 00272 g005 550
Figure 5. Immunohistochemical PRR staining according to UISS (mortality risk) (a,b) and SSIGN (disease progression) scales (c,d). PRR staining intensity was grouped as weak and intense. Chi-square test was used for data analysis.
Figure 5. Immunohistochemical PRR staining according to UISS (mortality risk) (a,b) and SSIGN (disease progression) scales (c,d). PRR staining intensity was grouped as weak and intense. Chi-square test was used for data analysis.
Diagnostics 11 00272 g005
Table
Table 1. Pathological and clinical characteristics of clear cell renal cell (CCRCC) cancer patients. WHO/ISUP: World Health Organization / International Society of Urologic Pathologists. TNM: Tumour (T), Node (N), Metastasis (M). SSIGN: Stage, Size, Grade, and Necrosis. UISS: UCLA Integrated Staging System.
Table 1. Pathological and clinical characteristics of clear cell renal cell (CCRCC) cancer patients. WHO/ISUP: World Health Organization / International Society of Urologic Pathologists. TNM: Tumour (T), Node (N), Metastasis (M). SSIGN: Stage, Size, Grade, and Necrosis. UISS: UCLA Integrated Staging System.
VariablesCCRCC Patients (n = 83)
Diameter
≤4 cm26
>4 to 7cm37
>7 cm20
WHO/ISUP grade
Low G1-G243
High G3-G440
Local invasion (pT)
Organ-confined pT1-pT265
Not confined pT3-pT418
Lymph node invasion (N)
No77
Yes6
Distant metastasis (M)
No73
Yes10
TNM Stage
Not-advanced (I-II)62
Advanced (III-IV)21
SSIGN (tumour progression)
Low progression 62
High progression21
UISS (mortality risk)
Low23
Intermediate42
High17
Patients’ Survival
Alive62
Dead of disease15
Dead by other causes6
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Solano-Iturri, J.D.; Echevarría, E.; Unda, M.; Loizaga-Iriarte, A.; Pérez-Fernández, A.; Angulo, J.C.; López, J.I.; Larrinaga, G. Clinical Implications of (Pro)renin Receptor (PRR) Expression in Renal Tumours. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11020272

AMA Style

Solano-Iturri JD, Echevarría E, Unda M, Loizaga-Iriarte A, Pérez-Fernández A, Angulo JC, López JI, Larrinaga G. Clinical Implications of (Pro)renin Receptor (PRR) Expression in Renal Tumours. Diagnostics. 2021; 11(2):272. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11020272

Chicago/Turabian Style

Solano-Iturri, Jon Danel, Enrique Echevarría, Miguel Unda, Ana Loizaga-Iriarte, Amparo Pérez-Fernández, Javier C. Angulo, José I. López, and Gorka Larrinaga. 2021. "Clinical Implications of (Pro)renin Receptor (PRR) Expression in Renal Tumours" Diagnostics 11, no. 2: 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11020272

APA Style

Solano-Iturri, J. D., Echevarría, E., Unda, M., Loizaga-Iriarte, A., Pérez-Fernández, A., Angulo, J. C., López, J. I., & Larrinaga, G. (2021). Clinical Implications of (Pro)renin Receptor (PRR) Expression in Renal Tumours. Diagnostics, 11(2), 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11020272

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop