Next Article in Journal
Fungal Septic Knee Arthritis Caused by Aspergillus fumigatus following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Next Article in Special Issue
A Nomogram for Predicting Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery during the Endoscopic Resection of Subepithelial Tumors of the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract
Previous Article in Journal
Muscle Oxygenation Level Might Trigger the Regulation of Capillary Venous Blood Filling during Fatiguing Isometric Muscle Actions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Diagnostic Accuracy of Non-Invasive Imaging for Detection of Colonic Inflammation in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Duodenal Pseudomelanosis: A Literature Review

by
Gianluca Lopez
1,2,*,
Marianna D’Ercole
2,
Stefano Ferrero
1,3 and
Giorgio Alberto Croci
1,4
1
Pathology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
2
School of Pathology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
3
Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
4
Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2021, 11(11), 1974; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11111974
Submission received: 11 October 2021 / Revised: 21 October 2021 / Accepted: 22 October 2021 / Published: 24 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnostic Imaging of Gastrointestinal Diseases)

Abstract

:
Duodenal pseudomelanosis (also known as pseudomelanosis duodeni) is a rare endoscopic incidental finding defined by a pigmentation limited to the apex of the intestinal villi, which requires histological confirmation. While its exact pathogenesis is still poorly understood, it appears free from clinical consequences. This condition is believed to be associated with oral iron intake, antihypertensive drugs containing a sulfur moiety (i.e., hydralazine, furosemide), and several chronic diseases (i.e., hypertension, end-stage renal disease, diabetes). However, the exact prevalence of these treatments and comorbidities among patients with duodenal pseudomelanosis is not clearly defined. Several case reports and case series about duodenal pseudomelanosis have been published in recent years. In this review, we aimed to clearly define its endoscopic and microscopic presentation; its epidemiology, associated comorbidities, and drugs; the most useful special histochemical techniques used to classify the nature of the pigmentation; and the most relevant differential diagnoses. In addition, by considering our findings, we also formulated a number of hypotheses about its pathogenesis.

1. Introduction

Duodenal pseudomelanosis (DP, Latin: pseudomelanosis duodeni) is a rare incidental finding encountered during upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy. The usual endoscopic presentation is a black-dotted mucosa, with pigment deposition at the apex of the duodenal villi. Microscopically, the pigmentation has been reported to be composed of iron and other substances, which accumulate in lamina propria macrophages [1]. Several comorbidities and drugs have been associated with this condition, with variable prevalences across different studies. The most frequently reported associated medical conditions in the setting of DP are hypertension, end-stage renal disease, and diabetes. Intake of oral iron and antihypertensive drugs containing a sulfur moiety, such as hydralazine and furosemide, is also frequently reported to be associated with DP [2]. DP is unrelated to colonic melanosis, which is caused by chronic laxative intake and demonstrates lipofuscin deposition in lamina propria macrophages. Although a number of case reports and case series exist, a comprehensive systematic review has not been published to date in the literature, and many clinicopathological associations are not yet clearly defined. Here, we review the published literature so far, to clearly define the endoscopic and microscopic presentation of DP; its epidemiology, associated comorbidities, and drugs; and the most useful special techniques used to classify the nature of the pigmentation. In addition, we discuss the possible pathogenesis of the condition by taking into account the reports reviewed and our clustering of data.

2. Materials and Methods

The online database PubMed was queried for studies published between 2001 and 2021, using the terms “duodenal pseudomelanosis”, “pseudomelanosis duodeni”, “duodenal melanosis”, “duodenal siderosis”, and “duodenal pigmentation”. In total, 216 records were identified and initially screened for inclusion. Inclusion criteria were endoscopic evidence of a DP pattern and/or microscopic evidence of pigmentation at the apex of the villi. After the initial screening, 186 studies were excluded because of a lack of relevance to the topic. A total of 30 studies remained, but 3 were excluded because of impossibility to access the full text. In total, 27 studies were included in this review. Figure 1 displays a flowchart showing the identification, screening, and inclusion of studies in this review.

3. Results

Results are presented in Table 1 and visualized in Figure 2. A total of 51 cases of DP were identified. Among these, 18 cases were male and 32 were female (F:M ratio: 1.8). A single case did not specify the patient’s gender. Patients’ mean age was 62.9 years (range 8–86 years). Two cases did not report the patients’ age.
A total of 38/51 (74.5%) patients had hypertension, 30/51 (58.8%) had renal disease, 20/51 (39.2%) had diabetes, and 5/51 (9.8%) had iron deficiency.
Moreover, 19/51 (37.2%) patients were under treatment with sulfur-containing diuretics (hydralazine, furosemide, hydrochlorothiazide), and 15/51 (29.4%) with iron supplementation; 10/51 (19.6%) patients were taking both types of medications simultaneously.
A total of 41/51 (80.4%) cases had endoscopic evidence of duodenal pigmentation. All cases had histological confirmation of macrophages within the lamina propria containing pigmented granules. In addition, 45/51 (88.2%) cases underwent special stains; 32/45 (71.1%) were positive for Prussian blue, and 3/45 (6.7%) were positive with Fontana-Masson stain. A single case was positive for both stains (1/45, 2.2%).

4. Discussion

The term “melanosis” is defined as an “excessive pigmentation of part of the body owing to a disturbance in melanin pigmentation” in Dorland’s Illustrated Medical Dictionary [28]. The term “pseudomelanosis” should therefore be applied to pigmentations that may resemble melanin deposition but with the demonstration of a different type of underlying pigment [9,29]. The two terms are not synonyms, as true melanosis in different organ sites refers to different clinical settings and has different implications [30,31]; however, they are widely used as synonyms in cases of diffuse pigmentation of the colon associated with excessive laxative use, with deposition of lipofuscin (melanosis coli) [32]. In practical terms, DP refers to a distinct endoscopic presentation, with pigmentation limited at the apex of the villi. The term “duodenal siderosis” could be appropriate for cases in which iron pigment is demonstrated [15].
The most common comorbidity associated with DP is hypertension, followed by renal disease, diabetes, and iron deficiency. The most frequently associated medications are sulfur-containing diuretics. The most widely adopted histochemical methods for the characterization of the pigment in the cases surveyed were Perl’s Prussian blue, which stains ferric iron (Fe3+), and Fontana-Masson, which stains ferrous iron (Fe2+) [22,33]. Among cases that underwent special stains, 34/41 (75.6%) stained positive for either Prussian Blue and/or Fontana-Masson. This demonstrates that the majority of the pigmentation in the setting of DP is due to iron deposition. The main use of Fontana-Masson stain in routine histochemistry is to demonstrate melanin deposition, but none of the Fontana-Masson-positive cases included in this review were interpreted as melanin [19,21]. A single case stained positive for both Perl’s Prussian blue and Fontana-Masson [25]. A single study analyzed a case using X-ray spectroscopy and elemental mapping, which demonstrated the presence of iron and sulfur [12]. A subset of cases (n = 4) focally stained positive for calcium [26].
The association of iron supplementation and DP, albeit widely stated across studies, was not completely evident in our review: only a subset of patients was under iron-pill supplementation (29.4%). In the largest case series to date (n = 17), a survey of duodenal biopsies of age-matched controls with a history of oral iron intake and without hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or end-stage renal disease found no evidence of iron pigmentation [26]. Given those facts, it is plausible to hypothesize that iron supplementation contributes to the pathogenesis of DP, but it is not sufficient as a single factor to induce duodenal pigmentation. The interplay between iron and sulfur may be important in this scenario, given the fact that the pigmented granules have been demonstrated to be most frequently composed of ferrous sulfate [12]. However, the proportion of patients taking sulfur-containing diuretics was also lower than expected (37.2%), as was the proportion of patients taking both medications simultaneously (19.6%). It must be noted that several studies included in this review did not state the medications taken by the patients at the time of diagnosis. When taking into account only the studies with information about treatment at the time of endoscopy (28/51, 54.9%), the proportion of patients undergoing treatment with sulfur-containing diuretics and iron supplements increased (19/28 (67.6%) and 15/28 (53.6%), respectively; 10/28 (35.7%) took both medications simultaneously). On one hand, those findings corroborate the hypothesis of a major role of these two types of medications in the pathogenesis of DP; however, other factors must be considered in order to explain DP in patients that are not under those medical treatments.
Dialysis, in the setting of end-stage renal disease, has been associated with the accumulation of lanthanum in the gastrointestinal mucosa [34]; a similar effect could play a role in duodenal sulfur deposition, possibly even in patients not treated with sulfur-containing diuretics. It is possible that the intake of sulfur and/or iron, contained in drugs and/or food, results in localized accumulation in the site of absorption only in the setting of an impairment of renal function and clearance. Notably, hypertension is a risk factor for chronic heart disease, commonly treated with sulfur-containing diuretics such as furosemide, and chronic renal disease; therefore, there is an indirect link between increased sulfur intake and impaired clearance. Microhemorrhagic events have also been theorized to be involved in the pathogenesis of DP [25]. It has been hypothesized that macrophages in the gastric lamina propria could be exposed to pigments via an iron-pill-induced mucosal injury [7], which was also reported in the duodenum [5]. However, all cases of DP reviewed showed no degree of acute or chronic inflammation. The pigment accumulation at the tip of the duodenal villi supports an iron-absorption-related mechanism. An overview of the possible mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of DP is presented in Figure 3.
Differential diagnoses include iron pill duodenitis (superficial iron deposition associated with erosion and inflammatory infiltrate) [5], clofazimine-related pigmentation (patchy endoscopic presentation) [35,36], eosinophilic enteritis (focal pigmentation, eosinophilic infiltrate within Brunner’s glands) [37], and primary and metastatic melanoma (pigmented tumoral masses) [38,39]. All of these conditions harbor a worse prognosis than DP to various degrees; histopathological and histochemical examinations are thus essential tools for the formulation of a correct diagnosis.

5. Conclusions

DP represents a benign incidental finding caused by pigment deposition (mainly iron) at the apex of duodenal villi and is associated with certain medical conditions (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic renal disease) and related therapies (sulfur-containing diuretics), which may be implicated in the pigment deposition and accumulation (duodenal drugs and iron absorption, microhemorrhages, decreased renal function). Differential diagnoses of duodenal pigmentations include diseases such as true melanosis, iron pill duodenitis, clofazimine-related pigmentation, eosinophilic enteritis, and primary and metastatic melanoma, all of which harbor different endoscopic, histologic, and histochemical findings. Pathological examination of duodenal biopsies in the setting of duodenal pigmentation is a reliable standard for diagnosis.

Author Contributions

G.L.: writing—original draft, investigation, visualization, writing—review and editing; M.D., investigation, writing—review and editing; S.F., supervision, validation, writing—review and editing; G.A.C., supervision, validation, methodology, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tsai, Y.-N.; Tsai, J.-W.; Tai, C.-M. Magnifying endoscopy for pseudomelanosis duodeni. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016, 31, 520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kim, S.Y.; Choung, R.S.; Kwon, B.S.; Hyun, J.J.; Jung, S.W.; Koo, J.S.; Yim, H.J.; Lee, S.W.; Choi, J.H. Small Bowel Pseudomelanosis Associated with Oral Iron Therapy. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2013, 28, 1103–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Cook, D.; Napthali, K. Pseudomelanosis Duodeni. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, e113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kudaravalli, P.; Saleem, S.A.; Riaz, S.; Pendela, V.S.; Vasigh, M.; Heisig, D. Black speckled duodenal mucosa. In Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings; Taylor & Francis: Oxfordshire, UK, 2020; Volume 33, pp. 237–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jeung, J.; Ashour, S.; Fuller, L. Iron pill-induced duodenitis: A distinct pattern of duodenal mucosal injury in a patient with a duodenal mass. Pathol. -Res. Pract. 2020, 216, 152916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nakanishi, Y.; Jetly-Shridhar, R.; De Felice, K. A Case of Pseudomelanosis Duodeni: Striking Endoscopic Features with Subtle but Characteristic Pathologic Findings. Int. J. Surg. Pathol. 2019, 27, 765–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tang, S.-J.; Zhang, S.; Grunes, D.E. Gastric and duodenal pseudomelanosis: A new insight into its pathogenesis. VideoGIE 2019, 4, 467–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Sutaria, A.; Bhutani, M.S. An Alarming but Benign Appearance, A Case of Pseudomelanosis Duodeni. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018, 16, A32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sunkara, T.; Caughey, M.E.; Gaduputi, V. Rare finding of concomitant pseudomelanosis of stomach and duodenum; case report and literature review. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Bed Bench 2018, 11, 86. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Shimamura, Y.; Akram, H.; Winer, S.; Marcon, N. Pseudomelanosis Duodeni and Duodenal Polyp. Intern. Med. 2018, 57, 1049–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Mundi, I.; Pankaj, R.; Chhabra, M.; Banerjee, A.K. Pseudomelanosis Duodeni. Int. J. Surg. Pathol. 2017, 25, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Iwamuro, M.; Oka, S.; Kanzaki, H.; Tanaka, T.; Kawano, S.; Kawahara, Y.; Okada, H. Pseudomelanosis duodeni:a case report. Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi 2017, 114, 1264–1268. [Google Scholar]
  13. AbdelWareth, A.; Molyneux, A.; Madhotra, R.; Ishaq, S.; Rostami, K. Small bowel pigmentation. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Bed Bench 2016, 9, 343–344. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Coelho, R.; Ribeiro, A.; Silva, R.; Rios, E.; Silva, M.; Macedo, G. Pseudomelanosis duodeni: Is there a common denominator? Rev. Española De Enferm. Dig. 2016, 108, 658–659. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kothadia, J.P.; Kaminski, M.; Giashuddin, S. Duodenal siderosis: A rare clinical finding in a patient with duodenal inflammation. Ann. Gastroenterol. 2016, 29, 379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Cochet, A.E.; Cunningham, J.R.; Butler, S.L. Pseudomelanosis duodeni and Strongyloides stercoralis. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 110, 1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sathyamurthy, A.; Chela, H.; Arif, Z.; Holly, J.; Arif, M. Pseudomelanosis Duodeni. ACG Case Rep. J. 2015, 2, 72–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Siderits, R.; Hazra, A.; Mikhail, N.; Chiaffarano, J.; Lou, W.; Fyfe, B. Endoscopically identified pseudomelanosis duodeni: Striking yet harmless. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2014, 80, 508–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Schuerle, T.; Aoun, E.; Clarke, K. Pseudomelanosis duodeni in a postrenal transplant patient. BMJ Case Rep. 2013, 2013, bcr2013200466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Jain, S.S.; Shah, D.K.; Khot, A.A. Pseudomelanosis Duodeni of Undetermined Etiology. Gastroenterol. Res. 2012, 5, 171–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. de Magalhães Costa, M.H.D.M.; Pegado, M.G.F.; Vargas, C.; Castro, M.E.C.; Madi, K.; Nunes, T.; Zaltman, C. Pseudomelanosis duodeni associated with chronic renal failure. World J. Gastroenterol. 2012, 18, 1414–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Felipe-Silva, A.; De Campos, F.P.F.; Da Silva, J.G.N. Duodenal pseudomelanosis (pseudomelanosis duodeni): A rare endoscopic finding. Autops. Case Rep. 2011, 1, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kakati, B.; Krishna, S.; Sharma, S.; Rego, R. Pseudomelanosis duodeni: A rare finding from upper endoscopy. Dig. Endosc. 2011, 23, 201–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yun, L. Gastrointestinal: Pseudomelanosis duodeni. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2010, 25, 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Monajemzadeh, M.; Tayari, N.; Najafi, M.; Madani, A.; Mahjoub, F.; Esfahani, S.T.; Ataei, N.; Ashtiani, M.T.H.; Mohseni, P.; Shams, S. Pseudomelanosis duodeni in a child with chronic renal failure. Saudi J. Kidney Dis. Transplant. 2008, 19, 645–646. [Google Scholar]
  26. Giusto, D.; Jakate, S. Pseudomelanosis duodeni: Associated with multiple clinical conditions and unpredictable iron stainability-a case series. Endoscopy 2008, 40, 165–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cantu, J.A.; Adler, D. Pseudomelanosis Duodeni. Endoscopy 2005, 37, 789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Dorland, W.A.N. Dorland’s Illustrated Medical Dictionary; Elsevier Health Sciences: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  29. Rana, N.K.; Minhas, U.; Mahl, T. A Rare Case of Duodenal Melanosis: Case Report. Cureus 2020, 12, e10475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Amaral, A.C.V.D.; Diniz, L.M.; Lucas, E.A.; Capeli, R.L.D.A. Diffuse cutaneous melanosis: Rare complication of metastatic melanoma. An. Bras. De Dermatol. 2017, 92, 62–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Pasick, L.J.; Paknezhad, H.; Sataloff, R.T. Laryngeal Melanosis. Ear Nose Throat J. 2019, 98, 70–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nesheiwat, Z.; Al Nasser, Y. Melanosis coli. In StatPearls [Internet]; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  33. Suvarna, K.S.; Layton, C.; Bancroft, J.D. Bancroft’s Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques; Elsevier Health Sciences: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  34. Yabuki, K.; Shiba, E.; Harada, H.; Uchihashi, K.; Matsuyama, A.; Haratake, J.; Hisaoka, M. Lanthanum deposition in the gastrointestinal mucosa and regional lymph nodes in dialysis patients: Analysis of surgically excised specimens and review of the literature. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2016, 212, 919–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bhangale, N.P.; Abraham, P.; Joshi, A.; Desai, D. Clofazimine-related duodenal pigmentation. Indian J. Gastroenterol. 2021, 40, 347–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Raftopoulos, S.C.; Fermoyle, S. An unusual cause of small-intestine mucosal pigmentation. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2011, 73, 1285–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Tee, H.; Swartz, D.; Tydd, T.; Leong, R.W. Gastrointestinal: Eosinophilic enteritis manifesting as brown-pigmented duodenal ulcers. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2009, 24, 1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Voudoukis, E.; Mpitouli, A.; Giannakopoulou, K.; Velegraki, M.; Datseri, G.; Bachlitzanaki, M.; Kazamias, G.; Fahouridi, A.; Mastorakis, E.; Vardas, E.; et al. Disseminated metastatic cutaneous melanoma to pancreas and upper gastrointestinal tract diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound: An unusual case. Clin. J. Gastroenterol. 2019, 13, 134–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Houissa, F.; Bouzaidi, S.; Mouelhi, L.; Ben Rejeb, M.; Moussa, A.; Mekki, H.; Dabbeche, R.; Trabelsi, S.; Said, Y.; Salem, M.; et al. Diffuse primary malignant melanoma of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Gastroentérologie Clin. Et Biol. 2010, 34, 85–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flowchart showing identification, screening, and inclusion of studies for this review.
Figure 1. Flowchart showing identification, screening, and inclusion of studies for this review.
Diagnostics 11 01974 g001
Figure 2. A heatmap visualization of the 51 cases of duodenal pseudomelanosis included in this review, with data on patients’ age, gender, histochemical stains positivity, relevant comorbidities, and medical treatments.
Figure 2. A heatmap visualization of the 51 cases of duodenal pseudomelanosis included in this review, with data on patients’ age, gender, histochemical stains positivity, relevant comorbidities, and medical treatments.
Diagnostics 11 01974 g002
Figure 3. An overview of the possible pathogenesis of duodenal pseudomelanosis. The macrophages in the lamina propria at the apex of the villi contain, in most cases, sulfur (S), which is contained in some diuretics, and iron (Fe), which could accumulate due to binging with sulfur after absorption or microhemorrahgic events. Chronic renal disease causes reduced sulfur clearance, contributing to its accumulation. (Created with BioRender.com).
Figure 3. An overview of the possible pathogenesis of duodenal pseudomelanosis. The macrophages in the lamina propria at the apex of the villi contain, in most cases, sulfur (S), which is contained in some diuretics, and iron (Fe), which could accumulate due to binging with sulfur after absorption or microhemorrahgic events. Chronic renal disease causes reduced sulfur clearance, contributing to its accumulation. (Created with BioRender.com).
Diagnostics 11 01974 g003
Table 1. Summary of the studies published between 2001 and 2021 describing cases of duodenal pseudomelanosis and siderosis.
Table 1. Summary of the studies published between 2001 and 2021 describing cases of duodenal pseudomelanosis and siderosis.
StudyEndoscopy ReasonPatient’s GenderPatient’s AgePatient’s HistoryMedicationsSpecial StudiesOther Relevant Info
Cook D, Napthali K, 2020 [3]DysphagiaM83Chronic kidney disease, hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitusHydralazine, irbesartan, lercanidipine, and metoprololNo
Kudaravalli P et al., 2020 [4]Gastrointestinal bleedingF83Hypertension, chronic kidney disease, hypothyroidism, atrial fibrillationAspirin, furosemide, metoprolol, levothyroxine, and warfarinYes (not published)
Jeung J et al., 2020 [5]Early satiety, weight lossF55Iron deficiency anemiaFerrous sulfatePrussian bluePigmentation not evident at endoscopy, Brunner gland cyst, active inflammation, erosion, gastric foveolar metaplasia, reactive mucin loss
Nakanishi Y et al., 2019 [6]Possible Crohn’s diseaseM72Proctocolectomy with end ileostomy, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, gout, arthritisNot statedPrussian blue
Tang SJ et al., 2019 [7]Not specifiedNot statedNot statedIron pill–induced mucositisIron supplementationPrussian blueConcomitant gastric pseudomelanosis
Sutaria A, Bhutani MS, 2018 [8]Epigastric painF77Hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidismNot statedNo
Sunkara T et al., 2018 [9]Determination of bleeding riskF83Atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary hypertension, chronic heart failure, non-Hodgkin’s lymphomaRivaroxaban (discontinued)NoConcomitant pseudomelanosis gastri
Shimamura Y et al., 2018 [10]Gastrointestinal bleedingM68Not statedNot statedPrussian blue
Mundi I et al., 2017 [11]Suspect celiac diseaseM61Chronic renal failureNot statedPrussian blue
Iwamuro M et al., 2017 [12]ScreeningM83Hypertension, chronic kidney disease, chronic heart failure, and chronic myeloid leukemiaFerrous citrate, furosemide, spironolactone, tolvaptan, bisoprolol, nicorandil, warfarin, nilotinib, febuxostat, esomeprazole, digestive enzyme complex, ambroxol, carbocysteine, potassium L-aspartateX-ray spectroscopy, elemental mapping
Abdelwareth A et al., 2016 [13]DyspepsiaM73COPD, ischemic heart disease, Iron deficiency anaemia, colonic polypEsmoeprazole, ranitidine, atorvastain, losartan, inhalers, and ferrous sulfatePrussian blue
Coelho R et al., 2016 [14]DysphagiaF76Diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, iron deficiency anemiaFerrous sulfatePrussian blueSchatzki’s ring
Kothadia JP et, 2016 [15]Anemia, weight lossM84Not statedNot statedPrussian blueDuodenal polyp, duodenitis
Tsai YN et al., 2016 [1]Acid refluxM63HypertensionHydralazineNo
Cochet AE et al., 2015 [16]DiarrheaMNot statedNot statedNot statedNoStrongyloides stercoralis infection
Sathyamurthy A et al., 2015 [17]Intractable nausea and vomitingM55Coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease stage 4, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, iron deficiency anemiaAntihypertensives (not specified)Prussian blue
Siderits R et al., 2014 [18]Abdominal painF80HypertensionHydralazine, laxatives (senna)Prussian blue
Kim SJ et al., 2013 [2]1 Not specifiedF73Diabetes mellitus, hypertensionIron sulfide, antidiabetics, loop diuretics, angiotensin II receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers (not specified)Prussian blue
2 Not specifiedM71Diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic renal failureIron sulfide, antidiabetics, calcium channel blockers, potassium binders (not specified)Prussian blue
3 Not specifiedF70Hypertension, chronic renal failureIron sulfide, loop diuretics, angiotensin II receptor blockers, beta-blockers, statins (not specified)Prussian blue
4 Not specifiedF34Chronic renal failureIron sulfide, loop diuretics, statins, potassium binders (not specified)Prussian blue
5 Not specifiedF69Diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic renal failureIron sulfide, antidiabetics, loop diuretics, angiotensin II receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, beta-blockers, potassium binders (not specified)Prussian blue
6 Not specifiedF55Hypertension, chronic renal failureIron sulfide, loop diuretics, statins (not specified)Prussian blue
Schuerle T et al., 2013 [19]Nausea, vomiting and diarrhoeaF54Diabetes mellitus type 2, end-stage renal disease, kidney transplant, hypertension, anaemia, hypothyroidismInsulin, pantoprazole, hydralazine, losartan, diltiazem, paroxetine, thyroxine, atorvastatin, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazoleFontana-Masson: positive; PAS: negative; Prussian blue: negative
Jain SS et al., 2012 [20]Epigastric painF48NoneProton pump inhibitor (not specified)Prussian blue: positive; Fontana Masson: negative
de Magalhães Costa MH et al., 2012 [21]1Melena, anemiaF66Diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic renal failureAngiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (not specified), furosemide, ferrous sulfate, folic acid and insulinFontana-Masson: positive (interpreted as iron)
2Acid refluxF37Hypertensive nephropathy, renal transplantationFurosemide, propranolol, hydralazine, ferrous sulfateNot stated
3AnemiaF70Diabetes, hypertension, chronic renal failure, nephrolitiasis, nephrectomyCalcium channel blockers (not specified), propranolol, α-methyldopa, furosemide, glibenclamideNot stated
4Epigastric pain, nausea, vomitingF30Diabetes, renal and pancreatic transplantationInsulin, tracolimus, mycophenolate and corticosteroids (not specified)Not stated
Felipe-Silva A et al., 2011 [22]Suspect upper gastrointestinal bleedingF86Hypertension, ischemic strokes, left hemiplegia, central VII nerve palsyHydralazine, captopril, hydrochlorthiazide, aspirinPrussian blue: negative; Fontana-Masson: negativeDistal esophagitis, gastritis and gastric angiodysplasia
Kakati B et al., 2011 [23]AnemiaF65End-stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hypothyroidismZolpidem, aspirin, clonidine, hydralazine, insulin, levothyroxine, and metoprololNot specified
Yun L, 2010 [24]MelenaF67End stage renal disease, coronary artery disease, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, anemia, hypothyroidismAspirin, clopidogrel, hydralazine, frusemide, benazepril, atorvastatin, ezetimibe, levothyroxine, and ironNo
Monajemzadeh M et al., 2008 [25]Abdominal discomfortF8Polycystic kidney disease, nephrotic syndrome, endstage renal disease, kidney transplantHydralazine, clonidine, amilodipine, oral iron supplements, phenytoinPrussian blue: positive; Fontana Masson: positive
Giusto D, Jakate S, 2008 [26]1Not specifiedF86HypertensionNot specifiedPrussian blue: positive
2Not specifiedF65Hypertension, end stage renal diseaseNot specifiedPrussian blue: partial
3Not specifiedF63Hypertension, diabetesNot specifiedPrussian blue: partialNo evidence of mucosal pigmentation at endoscopy
4Not specifiedF68HypertensionNot specifiedPrussian blue: partialNo evidence of mucosal pigmentation at endoscopy
5Not specifiedM60Hypertension, end stage renal diseaseNot specifiedPrussian blue: negative
6Not specifiedF63Hypertension, diabetesNot specifiedPrussian blue: positiveNo evidence of mucosal pigmentation at endoscopy
7Not specifiedF66Hypertension, end stage renal disease, diabetesNot specifiedPrussian blue: partial
8Not specifiedM70Hypertension, end stage renal diseaseNot specifiedPrussian blue: partialNo evidence of mucosal pigmentation at endoscopy
9Not specifiedF34Hypertension, end stage renal diseaseNot specifiedPrussian blue: partialNo evidence of mucosal pigmentation at endoscopy
10Not specifiedM52Hypertension, end stage renal disease, diabetesNot specifiedPrussian blue: partial
11Not specifiedM59Hypertension, diabetesNot specifiedPrussian blue: negativeNo evidence of mucosal pigmentation at endoscopy
12Not specifiedF53Hypertension, end stage renal diseaseNot specifiedPrussian blue: partialNo evidence of mucosal pigmentation at endoscopy
13Not specifiedM65HypertensionNot specifiedPrussian blue: partialNo evidence of mucosal pigmentation at endoscopy
14Not specifiedM52Hypertension, end stage renal diseaseNot specifiedPrussian blue: negativeNo evidence of mucosal pigmentation at endoscopy
15Not specifiedF49Hypertension, end stage renal diseaseNot specifiedPrussian blue: partial
16Not specifiedF58HypertensionNot specifiedPrussian blue: positive
17Not specifiedF67Hypertension, end stage renal disease, diabetesNot specifiedPrussian blue: partialNo evidence of mucosal pigmentation at endoscopy
Cantu JA, Adler DG, 2005 [27]Jaundice after cholecystectomyM49Chronic renal insufficiency, hypertensionHydralazineNot stated
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lopez, G.; D’Ercole, M.; Ferrero, S.; Croci, G.A. Duodenal Pseudomelanosis: A Literature Review. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1974. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11111974

AMA Style

Lopez G, D’Ercole M, Ferrero S, Croci GA. Duodenal Pseudomelanosis: A Literature Review. Diagnostics. 2021; 11(11):1974. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11111974

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lopez, Gianluca, Marianna D’Ercole, Stefano Ferrero, and Giorgio Alberto Croci. 2021. "Duodenal Pseudomelanosis: A Literature Review" Diagnostics 11, no. 11: 1974. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11111974

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop