Next Article in Journal
Impact of Three Different Algorithms for the Screening of SSc-PAH and Comparison with the Decisions of a Multidisciplinary Team
Next Article in Special Issue
Capsule Endoscopy: Pitfalls and Approaches to Overcome
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Updates and Advances in Winiwarter-Buerger Disease (Thromboangiitis Obliterans): Biomolecular Mechanisms, Diagnostics and Clinical Consequences
Previous Article in Special Issue
Patient-Reported Outcomes and Preferences for Colon Capsule Endoscopy and Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Capsule Endoscopy in Crohn’s Disease—From a Relative Contraindication to Habitual Monitoring Tool

1
Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Sackler Medical School, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer 52620, Israel
2
Sackler Medical School, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 67011, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2021, 11(10), 1737; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11101737
Submission received: 18 July 2021 / Revised: 3 September 2021 / Accepted: 16 September 2021 / Published: 22 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Capsule Endoscopy: Clinical Impacts and Innovation since 2001)

Abstract

Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory disorder that may involve the gastrointestinal tract from the mouth to the anus. Habitual disease monitoring is highly important during disease management, aiming to identify and treat disease exacerbations, in order to avoid immediate and future complications. Currently, ilio-clonoscopy is the gold standard for mucosal assessment. However, the procedure is invasive, involves sedation and allows for visualization of the colon and only a small part of the terminal ileum, while most of the small bowel is not visualized. Since CD may involve the whole length of the small bowel, the disease extent might be underestimated. Capsule endoscopy (CE) provides a technology that can screen the entire bowel in a non-invasive procedure, with minimal side effects. In recent years, this technique has gained in popularity for CD evaluation and monitoring. When CE was first introduced, two decades ago, the fear of possible capsule retention in the narrowed inflamed bowel lumen limited its use in CD patients, and a known CD located at the small bowel was even regarded as a relative contraindication for capsule examination. However, at present, as experience using CE in CD patients has accumulated, this procedure has become one of the accepted tools for disease diagnosis and monitoring. In our current review, we summarize the historic change in the indications and contraindications for the usage of capsule endoscopy for the evaluation of CD, and discuss international recommendations regarding CE’s role in CD diagnosis and monitoring.
Keywords: capsule endoscopy (CE); Crohn’s disease (CD); inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); pan-enteric capsule; guidelines; capsule retention capsule endoscopy (CE); Crohn’s disease (CD); inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); pan-enteric capsule; guidelines; capsule retention

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lahat, A.; Veisman, I. Capsule Endoscopy in Crohn’s Disease—From a Relative Contraindication to Habitual Monitoring Tool. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1737. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11101737

AMA Style

Lahat A, Veisman I. Capsule Endoscopy in Crohn’s Disease—From a Relative Contraindication to Habitual Monitoring Tool. Diagnostics. 2021; 11(10):1737. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11101737

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lahat, Adi, and Ido Veisman. 2021. "Capsule Endoscopy in Crohn’s Disease—From a Relative Contraindication to Habitual Monitoring Tool" Diagnostics 11, no. 10: 1737. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11101737

APA Style

Lahat, A., & Veisman, I. (2021). Capsule Endoscopy in Crohn’s Disease—From a Relative Contraindication to Habitual Monitoring Tool. Diagnostics, 11(10), 1737. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11101737

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop