Next Article in Journal
Multigene Phylogenetics and Morphology Reveal Five Novel Lasiodiplodia Species Associated with Blueberries
Next Article in Special Issue
Lignans from Bursera fagaroides: Chemistry, Pharmacological Effects and Molecular Mechanism. A Current Review
Previous Article in Journal
F4-Neuroprostanes: A Role in Sperm Capacitation
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effects of Cannabis sativa L. Extract on Oxidative Stress Markers In Vivo
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phytochemical Investigation, Antimicrobial, Antioxidant and Anticancer Activities of Acer cappadocicum Gled

by
Farzana Kausar
1,†,
Muhammad-Awais Farooqi
2,†,
Hafiz-Muhammad-Umer Farooqi
2,3,
Abdul-Rahim-Chethikkattuveli Salih
2,
Atif-Ali-Khan Khalil
4,
Chul-woong Kang
2,
Mohamed H. Mahmoud
5,
Gaber-El-Saber Batiha
6,
Kyung-hyun Choi
2,* and
Abdul-Samad Mumtaz
1,*
1
Department of Plant Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan
2
Department of Mechatronics Engineering, Jeju National University, Jeju-si 63243, Korea
3
National Control Laboratory of Biologicals, Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan, Islamabad 44090, Pakistan
4
Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan
5
Department of Biochemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
6
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Damanhour University, Damanhour 22511, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Both authors contributed equally.
Life 2021, 11(7), 656; https://doi.org/10.3390/life11070656
Submission received: 26 May 2021 / Revised: 29 June 2021 / Accepted: 2 July 2021 / Published: 5 July 2021

Abstract

:
The appearance of novel microbial resistance, diverse cancer ailment and several other morbidities such as appetite loss, hair loss, anemia, cell damage, etc., are among most critical situation that keeps the phytochemical quest on. Thus, this study characterized the antimicrobial, antioxidant, and anticancer potentials of a rarely accessed Acer cappadocicum gled (AC) population thriving in a remote Palas Valley in northern Pakistan. Leaf extracts of the plant were prepared in organic solvents with different polarities through maceration. Extracts were subjected to antimicrobial, antioxidant, and anticancer activities using agar well, DPPH and cell viability assays. A. cappadocicum methanolic extract (ACM) significantly inhibited bacterial growth, followed by n-butanolic extract (ACB) with the second-highest bacterial inhibition. Similar activity was observed against mycelial growth inhibition in plant-fungal pathogen by ACM and ACB. However, human pathogenic fungi did not affect much by extracts. In antioxidant assessment, the chloroform extract (ACC) showed strong scavenging activity and in cytotoxic evaluation, extracts restricted growth proliferation in cancer cells. The inhibitory evidence of extracts, potent scavenging ability, and low cell viability of human-derived cell lines supports the antimicrobial, antioxidant and anticancerous potential of A. cappadocicum. It advances our quest for natural product research.

1. Introduction

Infectious diseases caused by different bacterial species, e.g., Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus subtilis and Proteus vulgaris, pose major public health concerns worldwide. The antibacterial drugs meant to resist infectious agents lose their effectiveness due to the accumulating mutations in bacterial species [1]. Thus antibiotic resistance capability in bacteria eventually becomes very serious in treating pathogenic strains [2,3]. Other morbidities, for instance, cancer, have also been a major cause of death and pose a constant threat worldwide, which is characterized by dysregulation of signalling pathways at multiple steps during cell division. The cells in the human body undergo uncontrolled division resulting in tumor formation of malignant cells with metastatic potential. Recent treatments include chemoprevention, radiation exposure and synthetic medicines [4].
Furthermore, several human ailments are due to the occurrence of free radicals in the human body. These unstable free radicals tend to attain stable form by donating their free electrons to DNA, protein, amino acids, etc., causing extraordinary changes at cellular levels [5,6]. Occasionally, to overcome the deficiency of endogenous antioxidants, it is necessary to rely on herbal and dietary sources of antioxidants. Phytochemicals, such as carotenoids, tannins, polyphenols and phenolics, act as natural radical scavengers and organic sources for antioxidants [7].
Due to antibiotic resistance and toxicity issues of antibacterial agents, it is an unmet need to discover new and novel sources to combat bacterial diseases. The lack of effectiveness in treatment and the risk of potential side effects pushed researchers to find advanced chemoprotective solutions stipulating from plant extracts as natural compounds or derived synthetically from natural prototypes [3]. Many cultivated and wild plant species have been investigated for their inhibiting potential of free radicals. Several studies have successfully led to the drug discovery processes from natural sources, thus increasing interest in various “good food for health” and finding diversity in Phyto-antioxidant sources. Plant metabolites responsible for high antioxidant potential, mostly flavonoid and phenolics, can be further characterized by biochemical tests and spectroscopic methods [8,9,10]. Recently, plants are not only used for their nutritional value but also for treating many health problems. Much consideration has been given to plant extracts possessing different chemical constituents to inhibit bacterial infections. According to Murugan et al. [11], about 80% of the population in developing countries rely on plants for therapeutic purposes.
Plants are a natural source of secondary metabolites, e.g., saponins, tannins, alkaloids, phenolic and flavonoids, etc. These metabolites rich in their structural and functional diversity provide various effective bioactive compounds in extracts that prove efficacious against bacterial infections and cancer development. Moreover, these are less toxic to healthy human cells [12,13]. The genus Acer (a member of the family Aceraceae) is comprised of 129 species globally. Predominantly trees or shrubs, this plant family is famous for traditional uses such as anti-rheumatic, anti-hepatic, against eye disorders, treating bruises and a detoxifier. Members of Genus Acer are comprised of a variety of molecules with diverse functional groups. There have been extensive phytochemical studies on extracts of various Acer species around the world. However, its biological activities remain less discovered till today. Numerous Acer species have been investigated for their biological and pharmacological potentials [14]. Acer cappadocicum (Aceraceae) is a tall tree native to the western Himalayas of Pakistan. Taxonomically synonymized as Acer cultratrum wall., Acer laetum C.A. Meyer and Acer pictium, is locally known as kilpattar or Chinaranga in Pallas valley, Kohistan, KP, Pakistan [2,3]. Traditionally, A. cappadocicum improves blood circulation and relieves pain due to injury or rheumatisms [15]. In the Kohistan region, Acer cappadocicum is an endemic species, and its roots are locally claimed to heal animal foot disease. Hitherto, this species remains undocumented for biological and pharmacognostic aspects. Therefore, the main objective of the current study was to investigate the antimicrobial effect on human pathogenic strains, the antioxidant potential against free radicals, the anticancerous potential on liver, breast, lung and gut cell lines and the phytochemical aspects of various A. cappadocicum extracts.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection and Preparation of Plant Material

The branches of A. cappadocicum with green leaves were collected from Pallas valley, District Kohistan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. The collected plants were authentically identified with the help of a senior plant taxonomist and submitted to the herbarium Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Plant extracts were prepared through maceration following a previously reported method [16]. Dry leaves and branches were pulverized mechanically in a willy mill with mesh size 60, soaked in a solvent (20 g/200 mL) and placed over a shaker for 72 h. The material was then filtered through Whatmann No.1 filter paper and was evaporated at room temperature under shade. The resulting crude extract was then suspended in water and partitioned with n-hexane, ethyl acetate (EtOAc), chloroform and n-butanol (n-BuOH). The concentrated extracts were stored at 4 °C till further use.

2.2. Preliminary Phytochemical Analysis

The crude extract was subjected to a qualitative chemical test for the detection of phytochemicals such as flavonoids using a sodium hydroxide and magnesium ribbon test, alkaloids using the Mayer’s reagent test, the Keller–Killani test for glycosides, for saponins, a froth and emulsion test, for terpenoids (phytosteroids), a chloroform and sulphuric acid test, for tannins, a ferric-chloride and alkaline reagent test, and for proteins, xanthoproteic and Biuret tests, as per reported methods [17,18].

2.3. Antimicrobial Assays

Antimicrobial potential of plant extracts was evaluated using five pathogenic bacterial and four fungal strains. For antibacterial activity, the bacterial strains selected were: Kelabsiella pneumoniae (82431), an opportunistic pathogen with a history of chronic pulmonary diseases, Escherichia coli (52321), Bacilus subtilis, Salmonella enterica and Acinetobacter baumannii. These strains were obtained from the Department of Microbiology, Quaid-i-Azam University Islamabad. The agar well diffusion method was used for evaluating the antimicrobial potential of plant extracts [19,20]. Nutrient agar was prepared for bacteria according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Immediately after autoclaving, the media was allowed to cool at 45–50 °C in the water bath. The freshly prepared cooled media was poured (approximately 4mm depth) into flat bottom Petri dishes (90 mm in diameter). About 0.2 mL of test inoculum of bacteria was spread uniformly on the surface of solidified agar media using a sterile L-shaped glass rod. Four equidistant wells with a 5 mm diameter were made and 4 mm in depth on the agar using a sterile cork borer. Two more wells for positive and negative control at the middle of the agar plate were also made. About 25 μL of plant extracts (in a concentration of 4 mg/mL) and the controls were added into the wells. The positive and negative control wells received Kinamycin and DMSO, respectively. The wells were labelled carefully to correspond to the crude extracts and controls. The plates were stored at 4 °C for at least six hours to allow diffusion of extracts into agar, arresting the growth of test microbes. The plates were then incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. The test was carried out in triplicates. Antimicrobial activity was determined by measuring the diameters of the zone of inhibition.
For another study, the agar tube dilution method was used to elicit the extracts’ effects on the phytopathogen reported by Choudary et al. 1995. Three strains were used, Fusarium fujikuroi, Rhizopus oryzae and Pythium ultimum, which are plant pathogens causing disease in various economical plants. The results were determined as described previously [21].
Percentage   inhibition   of   fungal   growth = 100   linear   growth   in   test   tube   linear   growth   in   control × 100

2.4. DPPH Free Radical Scavenging Assay

A stock solution of 40,000 μg/mL was prepared by dissolving 40 mg of test plant extract in 1 mL of DMSO. Further working dilutions of concentrations 100 μg/mL, 200 μg/mL, 300 μg/mL, 400 μg/mL, 500 μg/mL, 600 μg/mL, 700 μg/mL, 800 μg/mL, 900 μg/mL and 1000 μg/mL were prepared by serial dilution method. DPPH solution (0.1 mM) was prepared by dissolving 0.975 mg DPPH in 25 mL of methanol. Then it was placed on a magnetic stirrer for 30 min in the dark. For the assay, 190 μL of freshly prepared DPPH solution and 10 μL of each sample was mixed in a 96-Well Microtiter Microplate. The negative and positive controls received Ascorbic acid and DMSO, respectively. The reaction plate wrapped in an aluminum foil was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. The absorbance of the test samples was measured at 517 nm. The percentage scavenging activity was calculated following [22,23], as described below:
Scavenging   activity %   = Abs   of   control     Abs   of   sample   Abs   of   control   × 100

2.5. Anticancer Assays

The human-derived cell lines were purchased from Korea Cell line bank, South Korea. These cell lines were grown in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 cell culture media. In contrast, normal cells (primary human cells) were cultured with their respective specific cell culture media. Cell culture media (Thermofisher, Grand Island, NY, USA) were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% v/v Penicillin /Streptomycin antibiotic solution for cell cultures (Thermofisher, Grand Island, NY, USA). The cells were kept in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 at 37 °C. The cytotoxic effect of plant extracts was investigated by MTS assay using Tetrazolium dye (Thermofisher, Grand Island, NY, USA) reduction to formazan deep purple soluble crystals through the metabolic activity of cells. In addition, cell viability was assessed as a function of absorbance at 490 nm.
First, we revived the preincubated cells. The cells were seeded in 96 well-microtiter plates at a concentration of 2000 cells per well/500 μL, followed by overnight incubation in the humidified environment with 5% CO2 at 37 °C. After that, cells were treated with different concentrations (1 mg/mL to 0.1 ng/mL) of plant extracts prepared by serial dilutions for 48 h in the environment of 5% CO2 at 37 °C. The negative control contained cells and media only without test extracts. The positive control had cells, media and tested samples. After 48 h of incubation, the cells were washed with PBS/Dulbecco’s phosphate buffer saline (DBPS) and followed by addition by MTS reagent 25 μL solution. The plate was incubated at 5% CO2 and 37 °C for 30 min. Absorbance was measured at 490 nm using a multimode microplate reader (SpectraMax i3x). The cell viability was estimated by (x − y)/z − y) × 100%, where x was the absorbance of sample, y was the absorbance of blank, and z is the absorbance of control. The IC50 value was calculated by obtaining a linear equation from a plot between the percentages of cell viability vs concentrations. A ‘P’ value p < 0.05 was considered as significant [24,25,26].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Phytochemical Screening

The results of the phytochemical screening of the extracts are summarized in Table 1. The members of Aceraceae are characterized by the presence of flavonoids and tannins, etc. [14]. The alkaloids, glycosides and proteins were confirmed in all extracts. Tannins were present only in methanolic and butanoic extracts. Steroids were found in ACM and phytosteriods in ACB and ACE.

3.2. Antimicrobial Assay

According to the current study, antibacterial activities of methanolic extract at a concentration of 40 mg/mL showed a maximum inhibition zone of diameters of 16.5 ± 1.0 mm against B. subtilus, E. coli and K. pneumonia and 15.0 ± 1.0 mm and 11 ± 2 mm against S. entrica and A. baunanni, respectively (Table 2). The n-butanolic extracts were not significantly different from methanolic extracts with inhibition zone diameters with the mean value of 15.0 ± 1.0 mm, 14.5 ± 1.0 mm and 15.0 ± 1.0 mm against B. subtilis, E. coli and K. pneumonia, respectively. Furthermore, the zone of inhibition exhibited by n-butanolic extracts against S. entrica is 11.5 ± 1.0 mm and 16.0 ± 1.0 mm, which is the highest value against A. buamanni among all extracts [20,27].
Plant extracts were also tested for pathogenic fungal strains mentioned as A. falvus, A. niger and Pythium sp. The extract showed no characteristic mycelial inhibition against fungal species. The percentage of inhibition of mycelial growth of fungal strains F. fujikuroi, R. oryzae and P. ultimum by plant extracts shown in Table 3. F. fujikuroi, a plant pathogen, causes bakanae disease in rice plants resulting in extraordinary elongation of diseased plants, eventually resulting in plant death [28]. R. oryzae is an opportunistic human pathogen causing Mucormycosis and pulmonary infection in immunocompromised patients [29] and P. ultimum, a plant pathogen causing damping-off and root rot disease in a variety of economical plants [30]. All extracts showed moderate activity, around 40–50%. The lowest inhibition was 34% by chloroform extract against F. fujikuroi, and the highest was 56% against P. ultimum of n-hexane extract [17,31].

3.3. Antioxidant Activity

The presence of free radicals in the human body results in various ailments. Antioxidants present in plants have a natural tendency to scavenge free radicals. DPPH is an easy, standardized and economical procedure to investigate the antioxidant potential in phytoextracts using a spectrophotometer [20,21]. IC50 value, the half-maximal inhibitory concentration was calculated to determine the 50% inhibition of DPPH radical by plant extracts. It was calculated by linear regression analysis, the lower the value of IC50, the higher the antioxidant ability of plant extracts [21,31]. The results indicate that chloroform extract has the strongest scavenging activity compared to other extracts. The IC50 values of all sample extracts are 0.5 23 (ACB), 0.5146 (ACE), 0.5987 (ACM) and 0.5108.
The results of DPPH radical scavenging (%) at various concentrations are illustrated in Figures (Figure 1a–f). From these figures, it is clear that plant extracts exhibited strong DPPH inhibitory activity. As shown in the figures, the inhibition rate of extracts is in concentration-dependent form and expressed as IC50 value (Table 4), which requires concentration of samples necessary for 50% inhibition of DPPH by extracts [32]. At higher concentrations, the activity of extracts was also higher. At a lower concentration (1.0 μg/mL), the extracts exhibited similar activity (Figure 1a,c,e). The ACC (Figure 1b) showed maximum inhibiting of DPPH with similar results of B. vahili extract in a study by K. Sowndhararajan and S.C. Kang, 2012 [33].

3.4. Anticancer Activity

The anticancer effects of extracts from A. cappadocicum on the growth of five different human cancer cell lines named Gut cancer (Caco 2 cells), Lung (A549), Breast (MDA MB-321), Lung cancer (NCI-H1437), liver hepG2 cells line and two normal cell lines named Human pulmonary alveolar epithelial cells (HPAEpiC) and Human renal proximal epithelial cells (HRPTEpiC) from ScienceCell were investigated by MTS assay. MTS upon reduction by cells metabolic activity formed soluble formazon dye and quantified by spectroscopic method [23,24]. The cell survival of n-butanolic, chloroform, methanolic and n-hexane extracts was in the order of MDA MB-321 > A549 > Caco2 cells without much difference regarding concentrations (Figure 2A–C). The extracts exhibited strong cytotoxic activity with 20–30% cell survival [34,35]. In addition to that, the cell viability effect on NCH-H1437 chloroform extract shows maximum anticancer activity with low cell viability. In Hepg2 cells, the methanolic extract showed the highest activity with the low survival rate of cells (Figure 2D,E) [36].
The plant extracts exhibited significant (p < 0.05) cytotoxicity against the cancerous cell, while normal cells (primary lung alveolar and renal primary tubular epithelial cells) appeared less sensitive to plant extracts. Relative much higher cell viabilities for normal cells suggested plant extracts were safe/nontoxic to normal cells [37]. The studies have shown that phenolic-rich extracts of Acer species inhibit cell proliferation in tumor cell lines [38]. In another study [39], it is suggested that Acer tegmentosum can be a source of antioxidant and anticancer drugs. Despite many chemical studies in maple plants and interests in its constituents, the cytotoxic effect of Acer species and A cappadocicum still not documented in the literature. In the following research, four types of extracts were used to perform MTS assay, and the results were expressed the percentage of cell viability. Notably, similar to our study, Acer extracts can inhibit the growth of the cells in human cell lines [39]. Plant extracts considerably inhibited cell survival, providing that AC can be a supplementary material for anticancer drug research.
As illustrated by Figure 2, the AC extracts exhibited significant cytotoxicity in cancerous cells in a dose-dependent manner. We screened five different cell lines for inhibition of cancerous activities. Out of five, four cancerous cell lines showed a notable decrease in cell survival rate, implying that extracts are exceptionally active towards cytotoxic effect. This can be attributed to tannins, quinones, steroids, phytosteriods and alkaloids in AC extracts. Moreover, Plant extracts exhibited a significant (p < 0.05) cytotoxicity towards lung (A549) and breast (MDA-MB 321) cell lines in a dose-dependent manner compared to other HepG2, HPAEpi and HPRTEpi cell lines (p < 0.05), respectively, while the normal cells showed much less sensitivity. The IC50 value was calculated to be 5.88, 6.16, 7.11 and 8.97 in A549, caco2, MDA-MB321 and NCI-H1437, respectively (p < 0.05), whereas normal cells showed relatively higher IC50 values. These results were also compared with two standard commercial anticancer drugs, cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin, for the comparative analysis of cell survival rate shown in Figure 2.
The overall potential of cytotoxic in A549 was 10–20%, followed by MDA-MB321 up to 20% and then caco2 cell >20%. In NCI-H1437, 30–40% cell survival rate was followed by 40–50% in HepG2 cells. HepG2 cells showed less cytotoxicity in all tested cell lines as shown in Table 5. Further to this, the cell survival rate in normal cell lines was also studied. The percentage cell viability was 50–68% in HPAEpic and 50–60% in HPRTEpiC, which showed that extracts are less toxic on healthy cells. These findings suggest that A. cappadocicum extracts are exceptionally bioactive against cancerous cell lines with a very low cell survival rate in A549, MDA-MB321 and Caco2 cells. Therefore, the AC plant can be an excellent natural material for anticancer studies in the lung (A549), Breast (MDA-MBA321) and gut (caco2) cancers.

4. Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of AC extracts to determine antibacterial, antioxidant and anticancer properties. The present study showed that AC extracts possess potential antibacterial activity against human pathogens and moderate mycelial inhibition of plant pathogens. In addition, extracts of A. cappadocicum have also shown a significant reduction in cancer cell line proliferation. These findings showed that AC is a rich source of bioactive chemicals with significant potential as nutraceuticals and health benefits. These properties can be connected to intrinsic active secondary metabolites found in AC leaves, including alkaloids, glycosides, quinones and tannins. However, more epidemiological work, research investigations and clinical trials are required in order to isolate the pharmacologically potent compounds that can contribute to the observed effects and explain the possible mechanism of actions of the plant and their potential efficacy on various medicinal formulations and severe diseases.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, F.K. and M.-A.F.; validation, F.K., A.-S.M. and C.-w.K.; formal analysis, F.K., A.-A.-K.K., M.H.M., G.-E.-S.B., H.-M.-U.F. and A.-R.-C.S.; investigation, F.K., H.-M.-U.F. and A.-R.-C.S.; resources, K.-h.C. and A.-S.M.; data curation, F.K., M.-A.F., C.-w.K., A.-A.-K.K. and H.-M.-U.F.; writing—original draft preparation, F.K., M.-A.F., A.-A.-K.K., G.-E.-S.B. and M.H.M.; writing—review and editing, F.K. and A.-A.-K.K.; visualization, A.-A.-K.K.; supervision; K.-h.C. and A.-S.M.; project administration, K.-h.C. and A.-S.M.; funding acquisition, K.-h.C. and A.-S.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting this study are available from corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to extend their gratitude to King Saud University (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) for the funding of this research through Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2021/406).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Neu, H.C. The crisis in antibiotic resistance. Science 1992, 257, 1064–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Baldé, M.A.; Tuenter, E.; Traoré, M.S.; Matheeussen, A.; Cos, P.; Maes, L.; Camara, A.; Haba, N.L.; Gomou, K.; Diallo, M.S.T.; et al. Antimicrobial investigation of ethnobotanically selected guinean plant species. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 263, 113232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nascimento, G.G.; Locatelli, J.; Freitas, P.C.; Silva, G.L. Antibacterial activity of plant extracts and phytochemicals on antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2000, 31, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Greenwell, M.; Rahman, P. Medicinal plants: Their use in anticancer treatment. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2015, 6, 4103–4112. [Google Scholar]
  5. Pham-Huy, L.A.; He, H.; Pham-Huy, C. Free radicals, antioxidants in disease and health. Int. J. Biomed. Sci. 2008, 4, 89–96. [Google Scholar]
  6. Pizzino, G.; Irrera, N.; Cucinotta, M.; Pallio, G.; Mannino, F.; Arcoraci, V.; Squadrito, F.; Altavilla, D.; Bitto, A. Oxidative stress: Harms and benefits for human health. Oxidative Med. Cell Longev. 2017, 2017, 8416763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Rahman, M.M.; Islam, M.B.; Biswas, M.; Alam, A.K. In vitro antioxidant and free radical scavenging activity of different parts of Tabebuia pallida growing in Bangladesh. BMC Res. Notes 2015, 8, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Couture, J.J.; Singh, A.; Rubert-Nason, K.F.; Serbin, S.P.; Lindroth, R.L.; Townsend, P.A. Spectroscopic determination of ecologically relevant plant secondary metabolites. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2016, 7, 1402–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Lee, S.; Oh, D.-G.; Singh, D.; Lee, J.S.; Lee, S.; Lee, C.H. Exploring the metabolomic diversity of plant species across spatial (leaf and stem) components and phylogenic groups. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Tlili, H.; Hanen, N.; Ben Arfa, A.; Neffati, M.; Boubakri, A.; Buonocore, D.; Dossena, M.; Verri, M.; Doria, E. Biochemical profile and in vitro biological activities of extracts from seven folk medicinal plants growing wild in southern Tunisia. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0213049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Murugan, T.; Wins, J.A.; Murugan, M. Antimicrobial activity and phytochemical constituents of leaf extracts of Cassia auriculata. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2013, 75, 122–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Bhaskarachary, K.; Naveena, N.; Polasa, K. Potential benefits of plant metabolites for human health. IJFND 2015, 52, 213–225. [Google Scholar]
  13. Seca, A.M.; Pinto, D.C. Biological Potential and Medical Use of Secondary Metabolites. Medicines 2019, 6, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Bi, W.; Gao, Y.; Shen, J.; He, C.; Liu, H.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, C.; Xiao, P. Traditional uses, phytochemistry, and pharmacology of the genus Acer (maple): A review. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 189, 31–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hamayun, M. Ethnobotanical studies of some useful shrubs and trees of District Buner, NWFP, Pakistan. Ethnobot. Leafl. 2003, 2003, 12. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bandar, H.; Hijazi, A.; Rammal, H.; Hachem, A.; Saad, Z.; Badran, B. Techniques for the extraction of bioactive compounds from Lebanese Urtica Dioica. Am. J. Phytomedicine Clin. Ther. 2013, 1, 507–513. [Google Scholar]
  17. NarasingaRao, V.; Dowluru, K. Phytochemical and biochemical studies of medicinal plant Globba bulbifera. Int. J. Phytother. 2014, 4, 50–53. [Google Scholar]
  18. Weli, A.M.; AL-Hinai, J.R.; Al-Mjrafi, J.M.; Alnaaimi, J.R.; Hossain, M.A.; Saeed, S.; Aktar, M.S. Effect of different polarities leaves crude extracts of Omani juniperus excels on antioxidant, antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities and their biochemical screening. Asian Pac. J. Reprod. 2014, 3, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ventura, J.; Fernandes, P.; Meira, D.; Sales, M.; Costa, H. Antifungal activity of plant extracts with potential to control plant pathogens in pineapple. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2016, 6, 26–31. [Google Scholar]
  20. Arulmozhi, P.; Vijayakumar, S.; Kumar, T. Phytochemical analysis and antimicrobial activity of some medicinal plants against selected pathogenic microorganisms. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 123, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Badshah, H.; Qureshi, R.A.; Khan, J.; Ullah, F.; Fahad, S.; Ullah, F.; Khan, A.M.; Hussain, I.; Khan, N. Pharmacological screening of Morchella esculenta (L.) Pers. Calvatia gigantea (Batsch ex Pers.) Lloyd and Astraeus hygrometricus Pers. mushroom collected from South Waziristan (FATA.). J. Med. Plants Res. 2012, 6, 1853–1859. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ahmad, S.; AbdEl-Salam, N.M.; Ullah, R. In vitro antimicrobial bioassays, DPPH radical scavenging activity, and FTIR spectroscopy analysis of Heliotropium bacciferum. BioMed Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 3818945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Malki, F.; Touati, A.; Moulay, S. Extraction and recrystallization of mesoionic pyrimidinium betaines. Int. J. Chem. Eng. Appl. 2014, 5, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Ogbole, O.; Segun, P.; Akinleye, T.; Fasinu, P. Antiprotozoal, antiviral and cytotoxic properties of the Nigerian Mushroom, Hypoxylon fuscum Pers. Fr.(Xylariaceae). ACTA Pharm. Sci. 2018, 56, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Thakkar, K.; Prasad, A.; Nayak, J.; Iyer, S.V.; Kumar, S. Antioxidant and in vitro cytotoxic activity of extracts of aerial parts of Cocculus hirsutus (L) using cell line cultures (breast cell line). J. Phytopharm. 2014, 3, 395–399. [Google Scholar]
  26. Chan, S.M.; Khoo, K.S.; Sit, N.W. Interactions between plant extracts and cell viability indicators during cytotoxicity testing: Implications for ethnopharmacological studies. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2015, 14, 1991–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Pareira, A.G.; Azevedo, E.; Pereira, F.; Ferreira, L.; Azevedo, R. Antimicrobial Potential of Plant Extracts from the Pitangui-Mg Region, Brazil. Arch. Biomed. Eng. Biotechnol. 2019, 1, 1. [Google Scholar]
  28. Cen, Y.-K.; Lin, J.-G.; Wang, Y.-L.; Wang, J.-Y.; Liu, Z.-Q.; Zheng, Y.-G. The gibberellin producer Fusarium fujikuroi: Methods and technologies in the current toolkit. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Eisen, D.; Robson, J. Complete resolution of pulmonary Rhizopus oryzae infection with itraconazole treatment: More evidence of the utility of azoles for zygomycosis. Mycoses 2004, 47, 159–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Osburn, R.; Schroth, M.; Hancock, J.; Hendson, M. Dynamics of sugar beet seed colonization by Pythium ultimum and Pseudomonas species: Effects on seed rot and damping-off. Phytopathology 1989, 79, 709–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Nazir, N.; Khalil, A.A.K.; Nisar, M.; Zahoor, M.; Ahmad, S. HPLC-UV characterization, anticholinesterase, and free radical-scavenging activities of Rosa moschata Herrm. leaves and fruits methanolic extracts. Braz. J. Bot. 2020, 43, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rezaeizadeh, A.; Zuki, A.; Abdollahi, M.; Goh, Y.; Noordin, M.; Hamid, M.; Azmi, T. Determination of antioxidant activity in methanolic and chloroformic extracts of Momordica charantia. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10, 4932–4940. [Google Scholar]
  33. Sowndhararajan, K.; Kang, S.C. Free radical scavenging activity from different extracts of leaves of Bauhinia vahlii Wight & Arn. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2013, 20, 319–325. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Nemati, F.; Dehpouri, A.A.; Eslami, B.; Mahdavi, V.; Mirzanejad, S. Cytotoxic properties of some medicinal plant extracts from Mazandaran, Iran. Iran. Red Crescent Med. J. 2013, 15, e8871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Soltanian, S.; Sheikhbahaei, M.; Mohamadi, N. Cytotoxicity evaluation of methanol extracts of some medicinal plants on P19 embryonal carcinoma cells. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 7, 142–149. [Google Scholar]
  36. Lombardi, V.R.; Carrera, I.; Cacabelos, R. In vitro screening for cytotoxic activity of herbal extracts. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 2017, 2675631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Nelson, V.K.; Sahoo, N.K.; Sahu, M.; Sudhan, H.H.; Pullaiah, C.P.; Muralikrishna, K.S. In vitro anticancer activity of Eclipta alba whole plant extract on colon cancer cell HCT-116. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2020, 20, 2–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. González-Sarrías, A.; Li, L.; Seeram, N.P. Anticancer effects of maple syrup phenolics and extracts on proliferation, apoptosis, and cell cycle arrest of human colon cells. J. Funct. Foods 2012, 4, 185–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Eo, H.J.; Park, G.H.; Kim, D.S.; Kang, Y.; Park, Y. Antioxidant and Anticancer Activities of Leaves Extracts from Acer tegmentosum. Korean J. Plant Resour. 2020, 33, 551–557. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Free radical scavenging of plant extracts by the DPPH method at different concentrations (μg/mL). Here, (a): ACB extract, (b): ACC extract, (c): ACE extract, (d): ACM extract, (e): ACN extract, (f): standard (ascorbic acid).
Figure 1. Free radical scavenging of plant extracts by the DPPH method at different concentrations (μg/mL). Here, (a): ACB extract, (b): ACC extract, (c): ACE extract, (d): ACM extract, (e): ACN extract, (f): standard (ascorbic acid).
Life 11 00656 g001aLife 11 00656 g001b
Figure 2. Cell viability: MTS assay histograms represent the percentage with respect to control cells (positive control: 20–40% viable cells) after the exposure to 1 ng/mL, 10 ng/mL, 0.1 μg/mL, 1 μg/mL, 10 μg/mL and 100 μg/mL of ACB, ACC, ACM and ACN extracts in Caco 2 cells (A), A549 (B), MDA MB-321 (C), NCI-H1437 (D), HepG2 (E) cancerous cell lines and HPAEpiC cells (F) and HRPTEpiC (G) cell lines. Data shows mean ± SE (n = 3).
Figure 2. Cell viability: MTS assay histograms represent the percentage with respect to control cells (positive control: 20–40% viable cells) after the exposure to 1 ng/mL, 10 ng/mL, 0.1 μg/mL, 1 μg/mL, 10 μg/mL and 100 μg/mL of ACB, ACC, ACM and ACN extracts in Caco 2 cells (A), A549 (B), MDA MB-321 (C), NCI-H1437 (D), HepG2 (E) cancerous cell lines and HPAEpiC cells (F) and HRPTEpiC (G) cell lines. Data shows mean ± SE (n = 3).
Life 11 00656 g002aLife 11 00656 g002bLife 11 00656 g002cLife 11 00656 g002d
Table 1. Phytochemical screening of A. cappadocicum extracts.
Table 1. Phytochemical screening of A. cappadocicum extracts.
ConstituentsTestsACBACCACEACMACN
AlkaloidsMayer’s reagent test+++++
TanninsFeCl3 test++
Alkaline reagent test++
Sterol
Steroids +
Phytosteroids ++
Glycosides +++++
Quinones ++++
Protein detectionxanthoprotiec test+++++
Notes: +: Positive test; −: Negative test.
Table 2. Antibacterial screening of A. cappadocicum extracts against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.
Table 2. Antibacterial screening of A. cappadocicum extracts against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.
IsolatesB. subtilusE. coliK. pneumoniaS. entricaA. baumanni
ExtractsZone of Inhibition (mm)
ACB1514.51511.516
ACC9.510.510014
ACE1213.514.51213
ACM16.516.2516.51511
ACN131111.5012
Zone of inhibition (mm) are expressed as the mean, ACB: n-butanolic extract, ACC: chloroform extract, ACE: ethylacetate extract, ACM: metholic extract and ACN: n-hexane extract of A. cappadocicum.
Table 3. The percentage of inhibition of mycelial growth of F. fujikuroi, R. oryzae and P. ultimum by plant extracts.
Table 3. The percentage of inhibition of mycelial growth of F. fujikuroi, R. oryzae and P. ultimum by plant extracts.
ExtractsF. fujikuroiR. oryzaeP. ultimum
ACB474753
ACC344553
ACE505152
ACM485249
ACN404956
Positive control567962
% age mycelial inhibition expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3); lower inhibition = 20–30%, moderate inhibition = 40–50%; high inhibition = 60–80%, Positive control; Terbinafine.
Table 4. The IC50 value of DPPH radical scavenging activity.
Table 4. The IC50 value of DPPH radical scavenging activity.
SampleIC50 (μg/mL)
ACB0.5233
ACC0.3597
ACE0.5146
ACM0.5987
ACN0.5108
Ascorbic acid15.67
Table 5. The percentage cell viability rate and IC50 values of extracts against various cell lines.
Table 5. The percentage cell viability rate and IC50 values of extracts against various cell lines.
Cell Lines% Age Cell ViabilityIC50 Value
Cancer Cell LinesA54920%5.88
Caco 210–20%6.16
MDA MB-32120%7.11
NCI-H143730–35%8.97
HepG240–50%9.11
Normal Cell LinesHPAEpiC57–68%13.44
HRPTEpiC50–60%14.85
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kausar, F.; Farooqi, M.-A.; Farooqi, H.-M.-U.; Salih, A.-R.-C.; Khalil, A.-A.-K.; Kang, C.-w.; Mahmoud, M.H.; Batiha, G.-E.-S.; Choi, K.-h.; Mumtaz, A.-S. Phytochemical Investigation, Antimicrobial, Antioxidant and Anticancer Activities of Acer cappadocicum Gled. Life 2021, 11, 656. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11070656

AMA Style

Kausar F, Farooqi M-A, Farooqi H-M-U, Salih A-R-C, Khalil A-A-K, Kang C-w, Mahmoud MH, Batiha G-E-S, Choi K-h, Mumtaz A-S. Phytochemical Investigation, Antimicrobial, Antioxidant and Anticancer Activities of Acer cappadocicum Gled. Life. 2021; 11(7):656. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11070656

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kausar, Farzana, Muhammad-Awais Farooqi, Hafiz-Muhammad-Umer Farooqi, Abdul-Rahim-Chethikkattuveli Salih, Atif-Ali-Khan Khalil, Chul-woong Kang, Mohamed H. Mahmoud, Gaber-El-Saber Batiha, Kyung-hyun Choi, and Abdul-Samad Mumtaz. 2021. "Phytochemical Investigation, Antimicrobial, Antioxidant and Anticancer Activities of Acer cappadocicum Gled" Life 11, no. 7: 656. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11070656

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop