Next Article in Journal
Design Technique on Speed Control Combined with an Inertial Element for Vibration Suppression
Previous Article in Journal
Hydrogen Supplementation in SI Engines: Enhancing Efficiency and Reducing Emissions with a Focus on Knock Phenomena
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Designing Hybrid Mobility for Agricultural Robots: Performance Analysis of Wheeled and Tracked Systems in Variable Terrain

School of Art and Design, Qilu University of Technology, Jinan 250353, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Machines 2025, 13(7), 572; https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13070572
Submission received: 18 May 2025 / Revised: 20 June 2025 / Accepted: 24 June 2025 / Published: 1 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Robotics, Mechatronics and Intelligent Machines)

Abstract

This study investigates the operational performance of fruit-picking robots under varying terrain slopes and soil moisture conditions, with a focus on comparing wheeled and tracked locomotion systems. A modular robot platform was designed and tested in both controlled environments and actual mountainous orchards in Shandong, China. The experiments assessed key performance metrics—average speed, slip rate, and path deviation—under combinations of four slope levels (0°, 8°, 18°, 28°) and three soil moisture levels (dry 10%, moderate 20%, wet 35%). Results reveal that wheeled robots perform optimally on dry and flat terrain but experience significant slippage and path deviation under steep and wet conditions. In contrast, tracked robots maintain better stability and terrain adaptability, demonstrating lower slip rates and more consistent trajectories across a wide range of conditions. A synergistic deterioration effect was observed when high slope and high soil moisture co-occur, significantly degrading the performance of wheeled systems, while tracked systems mitigated these effects. Complementary semi-structured interviews with 20 orchard stakeholders—including farmers, growers, and hired pickers—highlighted key user expectations: robust traction, terrain adaptability, reduced physical labor, and operational safety. The findings suggest that future agricultural robots should adopt adaptive hybrid mobility systems and integrate environmental perception capabilities to enhance performance in complex agricultural scenarios. These insights contribute practical and theoretical guidance for the design and deployment of intelligent fruit-picking robots in diverse field environments.
Keywords: fruit-picking robot; tracked vs. wheeled locomotion; slope-soil interaction; agricultural terrain adaptability; field robotics; orchard automation; semi-structured interviews fruit-picking robot; tracked vs. wheeled locomotion; slope-soil interaction; agricultural terrain adaptability; field robotics; orchard automation; semi-structured interviews

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, T.; Liu, D.; Li, X. Designing Hybrid Mobility for Agricultural Robots: Performance Analysis of Wheeled and Tracked Systems in Variable Terrain. Machines 2025, 13, 572. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13070572

AMA Style

Wu T, Liu D, Li X. Designing Hybrid Mobility for Agricultural Robots: Performance Analysis of Wheeled and Tracked Systems in Variable Terrain. Machines. 2025; 13(7):572. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13070572

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Tong, Dongyue Liu, and Xiyun Li. 2025. "Designing Hybrid Mobility for Agricultural Robots: Performance Analysis of Wheeled and Tracked Systems in Variable Terrain" Machines 13, no. 7: 572. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13070572

APA Style

Wu, T., Liu, D., & Li, X. (2025). Designing Hybrid Mobility for Agricultural Robots: Performance Analysis of Wheeled and Tracked Systems in Variable Terrain. Machines, 13(7), 572. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13070572

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop