Previous Article in Journal
Acoustic-Based Machine Main State Monitoring for High-Speed CNC Drilling
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Finite Element Analysis of Post-Buckling Failure in Stiffened Panels: A Comparative Approach

by
Jakiya Sultana
and
Gyula Varga
*
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Informatics, University of Miskolc, H-3515 Miskolc, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Machines 2025, 13(5), 373; https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13050373 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 19 March 2025 / Revised: 17 April 2025 / Accepted: 28 April 2025 / Published: 29 April 2025

Abstract

Stiffened panels are extensively used in aerospace applications, particularly in wing and fuselage sections, due to their favorable strength-to-weight ratio under in-plane loading conditions. This research employs the commercial finite element software Ansys- 19 to analysis the critical buckling and ultimate collapse load of an aluminum stiffened panel having a dimension of 1244 mm (Length) × 957 mm (width) × 3.5 mm (thickness), with three stiffener blades located 280 mm away from each other. Both the critical buckling load and post-buckling ultimate failure load of the panel are validated against the experimental data found in the available literature, where the edges towards the length are clamped and simply supported, and the other two edges are free. For nonlinear buckling analysis, a plasticity power law is adopted with a small geometric imperfection of 0.4% at the middle of the panel. After the numerical validation, the investigation is further carried out considering four different lateral pressures, specifically 0.013 MPa, 0.065 MPa, 0.085 MPa, and 0.13 MPa, along with the compressive loading boundary conditions. It was found that even though the pressure application of 0.013 MPa did not significantly impact the critical buckling load of the panel, the ultimate collapse load was reduced by 18.5%. In general, the ultimate collapse load of the panel was severely affected by the presence of lateral pressure while edge compressing. Three opening shapes—namely, square, circular, and rectangular/hemispherical—were also investigated to understand the behavior of the panel with openings. It was found that the openings significantly affected the critical buckling load and ultimate collapse load of the stiffened panel, with the lateral pressure also contributing to this effect. Finally, in critical areas with higher lateral pressure load, a titanium panel can be a good alternative to the aluminum panel since it can provide almost twice to thrice better buckling stability and ultimate collapse load to the panels with a weight nearly 1.6 times higher than aluminum. These findings highlight the significance of precision manufacturing, particularly in improving and optimizing the structural efficiency of stiffened panels in aerospace industries.
Keywords: stiffened panels; critical buckling; ultimate collapse; finite element method stiffened panels; critical buckling; ultimate collapse; finite element method

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sultana, J.; Varga, G. Finite Element Analysis of Post-Buckling Failure in Stiffened Panels: A Comparative Approach. Machines 2025, 13, 373. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13050373

AMA Style

Sultana J, Varga G. Finite Element Analysis of Post-Buckling Failure in Stiffened Panels: A Comparative Approach. Machines. 2025; 13(5):373. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13050373

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sultana, Jakiya, and Gyula Varga. 2025. "Finite Element Analysis of Post-Buckling Failure in Stiffened Panels: A Comparative Approach" Machines 13, no. 5: 373. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13050373

APA Style

Sultana, J., & Varga, G. (2025). Finite Element Analysis of Post-Buckling Failure in Stiffened Panels: A Comparative Approach. Machines, 13(5), 373. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13050373

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop