3.1. Steady-Simulation Results
The numerical performance of the S_A model (refer to
Table 1) at 6000 rpm is shown in
Table 2. The outlet pressure was increased from 110 kPa to 120.0 kPa, and 120.7 kPa was found to be the near-stall point at that speed.
Tip-leakage flow was analyzed at the working points shown in
Table 2. To facilitate the analysis of the tip-leakage flow distribution, the tip-clearance region was divided equally into six sections along the blade chord. As shown in
Figure 6, the local leakage flow rate relative to the mass flow rate in a blade passage was calculated for each section at different outlet pressures. The leakage-flow distributions of the two stages show similar tendencies. The convex distributions of the relative local leakage were found near the design condition; this might be related to the performance of the cascade. With increasing outlet pressure, the relative local leakage flow either increased or stayed almost unchanged. The negative effect of the tip-leakage flow on the main flow might have increased. Once the outlet pressure rose to some extent, the relative local leakage in the front of the blade rose and the distribution changed to monotonic descent along the chord. It was suggested that the distribution variation of the local leakage could be used as a criterion to identify occurrences of instability in the numerical simulation.
The local blade load along the blade chord is defined by the local static pressure difference:
where
ps,p is the static pressure on the pressure surface and
ps,s is the static pressure on the suction surface.
Static pressure at 90% blade height was considered representative of the main flow and potentially related to leakage flow. As shown in
Figure 7, local blade data were plotted against the local relative leakage flow rate at different rotating speeds, different outlet pressures and different stages. The data points were effectively regressed into a quadratic curve with a correlation coefficient of 0.96. The strong correlation suggests that the local leakage flow is driven by the local blade load.
The local blade load is plotted along the blade chords for both stages at the different outlet pressures in
Figure 8a; the inlet volume-flow-rate coefficients of the compressor are shown in
Figure 8b. Slight convex curves were found for both stages operating near the design points. Similarly to the distributions in
Figure 6, the local load in the leading-edge portion increased gradually with increasing outlet pressure; then, monotonic descent curves appeared. The monotonic descent curve of the first stage appeared earlier than that of the second stage. The local load curve of the first-stage became an oblique line, while the local load curve of the second-stage remained a slight convex shape. It can be concluded that even if the first stage reached its maximum pressure-rise operating point, the second stage would still have some potential to increase pressure-rise continuously. The local blade load is shown in
Figure 8b as a 3D plot, with the volume-flow coefficient being the second independent parameter for both stages. It was observed that the second stage always operated under a higher volume flow coefficient. Considering the fact that both stages had a similar blade profile and that the local load curves always showed slight convex shapes, the first stage looks to be the bottleneck of this compressor.
Some in-depth analysis of the first-stage rotor was then conducted.
Figure 9 shows the relative Q-criterion contour in the first-stage rotor of the S_A model under near-stall conditions. It was found that the tip-leakage vortices and the separation vortices on the suction side were generated at the leading-edge portion of the blade. The tip-leakage vortices developed in streamwise, mixed with the end-wall vortices generated from the hub in the middle of the passage, then diffusing near the blade-passage exit. The mixed vortices occupied the most sectional area at the blade-passage outlet, resulting in near-stall conditions.
The effect of the CT was evaluated with the stability enhancement coefficient,
γ:
where
ϕ is the flow-rate coefficient, subscript “stall” represents the near-stall point, subscript “A” represents the smooth wall (without CT), subscript “G” represents the condition with the grooves and subscript “d” represents the design point.
Simulations were conducted with different groove-coverage ranges [
15]. As shown in
Figure 10, the stability-enhancement coefficients increased monotonically with increasing CT coverage. However, the first 50% of coverage contributed to the 70% stability enhancement. It would have been more cost-effective to configure the CT near the leading edge.
Figure 11 showed improvement of the S_B model over the S_A model in compressor performance. The circumferential-groove coverage was about 35% there. The working range was obviously extended via the stability enhancement effect of the circumferential grooves, with a little penalty of a decreasing pressure-rise coefficient.
The local leakage distributions with the S_B model along the blade chords for both stages are shown in
Figure 12. The outlet pressure ranged from 120 kPa to 120.45 kPa to obtain the converged simulation results. Compared with that in
Figure 6, the leakage-flow-distribution data pattern changed. Leakage flow in R1 generally decreased with increasing compressor outlet pressure, and in the 35% region covered in grooves, the leakage flow had a local minimum value.
The local blade-load curves for both stages, with the S_B model, are plotted in
Figure 13. Compared with the results with the S_A model, the convex curves appeared under all of the working conditions, even the near-stall condition. The blade load in the leading-edge portion was reduced via the circumferential grooves. Furthermore, the convex curve of the second stage did not change characteristics with a flow-rate decrease; it maintained a continuous pressure-rise ability. At the same time, the local blade load of the first stage decreased with the flow-rate decrease. As a whole, the local load curves of the second stage were higher than those of the first stage.
It was concluded from the steady-simulation results that the distribution characteristic of local blade load has a strong effect on the maximum pressure-rise capability of the compressor. At least for the compressor under study, the stable operating range was mainly limited by the first stage. Stability enhancement could be achieved with a circumferential-groove casing treatment in the leading-edge portion.
3.2. Unsteady-Simulation Results Analysis
In addition to the steady-state simulation results, an unsteady simulation was necessary to reveal the interaction of rotor/stator cascades and unsteady interaction between the two stages of the compressor.
The convergence process of the unsteady simulation of the U_A model (unsteady and structure A) is shown in
Figure 14a as loops in the phase diagram of the pressure-rise coefficient and the mass flow rate. The range of the loops becomes larger with increasing outlet pressure, indicating a greater possibility of developing into unstable flow. The mass flow rate with 122.5 kPa outlet pressure at each computing step is shown in
Figure 14b. After some time, the mass-flow-rate curve had a significant drop, and the corresponding loop in the phase diagram also broke up. Both phenomena indicate the compressor flow becoming unstable.
The unsteady simulation resulted in a wider stable working range with the U_A model than did the steady simulation with the S_A model. The maximum outlet pressure achieved was 122.4 kPa, with a flow coefficient of 0.294, and the maximum pressure-rise coefficient increased to 0.706. Snapshots of the local load and the corresponding leakage-flow distribution for both stages are shown in
Figure 15, with the exact time step appended to the legend of each curve. While the magnitudes were different, the distribution patterns were very similar to those obtained from the steady simulation. The following discussion focuses on the results for the near-stall flow.
The local blade-load curves for both stages, with the U_A model, are plotted in
Figure 16. The outlet pressure was set from 121 kPa to 122.4 kPa to obtain the converged solutions. On the condition of an outlet pressure of 121 kPa, the local load curves of the two rotor blades were both monotonic descent curves from the leading edge to the trailing edge. The load in the lending portion of the first stage was obviously higher than that of the second stage. Compared with the steady-simulation results given in
Figure 8, a higher local load for the second stage was obtained here.
As the outlet pressure increased, the flow rate of the compressor decreased and the local load in the leading-edge portion of the first-stage rotor dropped distinctly. The first stage might have achieved its flow-rate stall limit. Due to the interaction of the two stages, the overall load distribution of the second stage was obviously reduced and presented as “fatter” curves in the largest part of the chord. This phenomenon was not observed in the steady-simulation results. It was inferred that the influence of the local load on the flow-rate stall limit would be compensated for with the second stage. The load in the leading-edge portion of the first stage was mitigated by the interaction; then, the two-stage compressor as a whole could extend its stable working range to the lower-flow-rate conditions. When the outlet pressure reached 122.3 kPa, the local load of the second stage decreased further, to a negative value, in the leading-edge portion. This suggests that instability, causing interaction between the two stages, might happen. When the outlet pressure was increased to 122.4 kPa, some abrupt changes happened. The overall load curve of the first stage moved downward as a whole, while the trailing-edge portion became negative, which meant the portion lost its normal pressure-rise capability. Meanwhile, the load curve of the second stage remained a monotonic descent curve.
The vortex development in the first stage was explored.
Figure 17 shows snapshots of the relative Q-criterion contours on the sections during the unsteady simulation of the “U_A_122400Pa” model. These vortices occupied more space than those in
Figure 8. The vortex on the suction surface gradually separated from the wall in the flowing process. The leakage vortex and the separation vortex gradually spread to the whole sectional area. The flow with vortices was reorganized via the stator (S1); then, the inlet flow of the second stage was improved to pressurize the fluid normally, while the first-stage flow further reached its lowest flow rate. Referring to the load curve in
Figure 16, the second-stage rotor displayed a maximum pressure-rise capacity in this case.
Figure 18 shows the streamlines of flow in the blade-tip regions of both stages’ rotors in the “U_A_122400Pa” model. The leakage flow (red streamlines) left the blade-tip-clearance region, which was driven by the local load, and mixed with the main stream near the casing in
Figure 18a. Extra momentum from the leakage flow drove the mixed flow to the tip clearance of the adjacent blade.
Figure 18b shows that the tip-leakage flow propagated circumferentially across all blade passages in the second stage. The so-called “leading edge overflow” phenomenon appeared. It was inferred that the second stage was in the extreme load condition, corresponding to the maximum pressure-rise capacity of the two-stage compressor.
It was concluded through the unsteady-simulation results that the extreme local blade load appeared first in the leading-edge portion of the first stage, with a decreasing flow rate. The second stage could compensate for the first-stage performance through reducing its blade load. Therefore, the unsteady simulation gave a lower flow-rate-stall limit for the compressor. Unsteady interaction between the two stages drive them to the near-stall condition.