Next Article in Journal
Notes on the Free Additive Convolution
Previous Article in Journal
About Some Unsolved Problems in the Stability Theory of Stochastic Differential and Difference Equations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Remarks on an Identity of Anastase and Díaz-Barrero

1
Morsbacher Straße 10, 51545 Waldbröl, Germany
2
Auf der Bloß 16, 72762 Reutlingen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Axioms 2025, 14(6), 454; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms14060454
Submission received: 4 May 2025 / Revised: 4 June 2025 / Accepted: 5 June 2025 / Published: 9 June 2025

Abstract

:
We extend an algebraic identity of Anastase and Díaz-Barrero (2022) and apply our results to deduce various formulas for sums and series involving (among others) Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, Bernoulli polynomials, and the Riemann zeta function.

1. Introduction and Main Results

In an interesting paper published by Anastase and Díaz-Barrero [1] in 2022, the authors studied several inequalities involving the classical Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, F n and L n . Among others, they proved that for n 2 ,
j = 2 n F j ( F j + 3 2 ) 2 L n + 1 + L n + 3 10 20 ( F n + 2 1 ) .
In order to deduce their results, they applied certain discrete inequalities and the following algebraic identity.
Proposition 1.
Let a j ( 1 j n ; n 3 ) be positive real numbers. Then,
j = 2 n a j ν = 1 j 1 a ν 1 ν = 1 j a ν 1 = a 1 1 j = 2 n a j j = 1 n a j 1 .
Formula (1) (which also holds for n = 2 ) can be written in a simpler form as
j = 2 n a j A j 1 A j = 1 a 1 1 A n ,
where
A ν = j = 1 ν a j .
The aim of this paper is to show that two modified versions of (2) can be used to obtain formulas for certain sums and series, like, for instance,
1 2 5 = 1 j = 0 F 2 j L 2 j 1 L 2 j + 1 1 .
Anastase and Díaz-Barrero proved (1) by induction on n. Here, we apply a different method based upon the binomial theorem and telescoping summation to establish the following extensions of (2).
Theorem 1.
Let a j ( 1 j n ; n 2 ) be non-zero complex numbers with A j 0 ( 1 j n ) . Then, we have for integers m 0 and k 1 ,
1 A m + n k = 1 A m + 1 k + j = m + 2 m + n a j A j 1 A j k ν = 0 k 1 k ν A j a j ν
and
1 A m + n k = 1 A m + 1 k j = m + 2 m + n 1 A j k ν = 1 k k ν a j A j 1 ν .
Proof. 
Let 2 j n , m 0 and k 1 .
(i) Using the binomial theorem gives
A m + j 1 k = ( A m + j a m + j ) k = ν = 0 k 1 k ν A m + j ν ( a m + j ) k ν + A m + j k .
Then
1 A m + n k 1 A m + 1 k = j = 2 n 1 A m + j k 1 A m + j 1 k = j = 2 n A m + j 1 k A m + j k A m + j 1 k A m + j k = j = 2 n 1 A m + j 1 k A m + j k ν = 0 k 1 k ν A m + j ν ( a m + j ) k ν .
This leads to (3).
(ii) We have
A m + j k = ( A m + j 1 + a m + j ) k = A m + j 1 k + ν = 1 k k ν A m + j 1 k ν a m + j ν .
It follows that
1 A m + n k 1 A m + 1 k = j = 2 n A m + j k A m + j 1 k A m + j 1 k A m + j k = j = 2 n 1 A m + j 1 k A m + j k ν = 1 k k ν A m + j 1 k ν a m + j ν .
This gives (4). □
Remark 1.
Setting m = 0 and k = 1 in (3) and (4) leads to (2).
In the next section, we apply (3) and (4) to deduce various formulas for finite sums and series which we could not locate in the literature. Our examples involve (among others) harmonic numbers, the Riemann zeta function, Fibonacci and Lucas numbers, Bernoulli polynomials, and the Pochhammer symbol. The interested reader may easily discover additional results.

2. Applications and Illustrative Examples

I. The harmonic numbers are defined by
H 0 = 0 , H n = j = 1 n 1 j ( n 1 ) .
We set a j = 1 / j . Then, we obtain from (3) with m = 0 :
1 H n k = 1 + j = 2 n 1 j H j 1 H j k ν = 0 k 1 k ν ( j H j ) ν .
If n , then
j = 2 1 j H j 1 H j k ν = 0 k 1 k ν ( j H j ) ν = 1 .
From (5) with k = 2 and k = 3 , we get
j = 2 1 2 j H j ( j H j 1 H j ) 2 = 1
and
j = 2 1 3 j H j + 3 j 2 H j 2 ( j H j 1 H j ) 3 = 1 .
II. Let s , z C with ( s ) > 1 and | z | 1 . The polylogarithm function is defined by
Li s ( z ) = j = 1 z j j s .
The special case z = 1 leads to the Riemann zeta function
Li s ( 1 ) = j = 1 1 j s = ζ ( s ) .
We set
a j = a j ( s , z ) = z j j s a n d A j = A j ( s , z ) = ν = 1 j a ν = Li j , s ( z ) .
Then, (3) with m = 0 gives for z 0 ,
1 Li n , s k ( z ) = 1 z k + j = 2 n z j j s Li j 1 , s ( z ) Li j , s ( z ) k ν = 0 k 1 k ν j s z j Li j , s ( z ) ν .
If n , then we get a formula involving the polylogarithm function,
1 Li s k ( z ) = 1 z k + j = 2 z j j s Li j 1 , s ( z ) Li j , s ( z ) k ν = 0 k 1 k ν j s z j Li j , s ( z ) ν .
From (6) with k = 1 and k = 2 , we obtain
1 Li s ( z ) = 1 z j = 2 z j j s Li j 1 , s ( z ) Li j , s ( z )
and
1 Li s 2 ( z ) = 1 z 2 + j = 2 z 2 j ( j s Li j 1 , s ( z ) Li j , s ( z ) ) 2 1 2 j s z j Li j , s ( z ) .
We set z = 1 in (7) and (8). This leads to identities involving the ζ -function,
1 ζ ( s ) = 1 j = 2 1 j s ζ j 1 ( s ) ζ j ( s )
and
1 ζ 2 ( s ) = 1 + j = 2 1 2 j s ζ j ( s ) ( j s ζ j 1 ( s ) ζ j ( s ) ) 2 ,
with ζ j ( s ) = Li j , s ( 1 ) = ν = 1 j 1 / ν s . In particular, from (9) with s = 2 and s = 3 , we obtain series representations for 1 / π 4 and 1 / ζ 2 ( 3 ) ,
36 π 4 = 1 + j = 2 1 2 j 2 H j ( 2 ) j 2 H j 1 ( 2 ) H j ( 2 ) 2 a n d 1 ζ 2 ( 3 ) = 1 + j = 2 1 2 j 3 H j ( 3 ) j 3 H j 1 ( 3 ) H j ( 3 ) 2 ,
where H n ( 2 ) = ζ n ( 2 ) and H n ( 3 ) = ζ n ( 3 ) are the n-th harmonic number of order 2 and 3, respectively. The number ζ ( 3 ) is known as Apéry constant.
Next, we set z = 1 in (7). Then,
1 ( 1 2 1 s ) ζ ( s ) = 1 + j = 2 ( 1 ) j j s Li j 1 , s ( 1 ) Li j , s ( 1 ) .
If s 1 , then we get from (10)
1 log 2 = 1 + j = 2 ( 1 ) j j S j 1 S j ,
where S j = ν = 1 j ( 1 ) ν + 1 / ν . We use (8) with s = 1 , z = 1 . This gives
1 ( log 2 ) 2 = 1 + j = 2 1 + 2 ( 1 ) j j S j ( j S j 1 S j ) 2 .
Finally, we apply (7) with s = 2 , z = 1 / 2 . We set
Λ j = Li j , 2 ( 1 / 2 ) = ν = 1 j 1 2 ν ν 2
and use
Li 2 ( 1 / 2 ) = π 2 12 log 2 2 2 ;
see Lewin [2] (p. 6). Then, we obtain
j = 2 1 2 j j 2 Λ j 1 Λ j = 2 12 π 2 6 log 2 2 .
III. We set
a j = a j ( x ) = sin ( ( 2 j 1 ) x ) a n d A ν = A ν ( x ) = j = 1 ν a j = sin 2 ( ν x ) sin ( x ) ;
see Milovanović et al. [3] (p. 326). Using (3) with m = 0 yields
sin k ( x ) sin 2 k ( n x ) = 1 sin k ( x ) + j = 2 n sin ( ( 2 j 1 ) x ) sin 2 ( x ) sin 2 ( ( j 1 ) x ) sin 2 ( j x ) k ν = 0 k 1 k ν sin 2 ( j x ) sin ( ( 2 j 1 ) x ) sin ( x ) ν .
We set x = π / ( 3 n ) and k = 1 . Since sin ( π / 3 ) = 3 / 2 , we obtain the summation formula
j = 2 n sin ( ( 2 j 1 ) π 3 n ) sin 2 ( ( j 1 ) π 3 n ) sin 2 ( j π 3 n ) = 1 sin 3 ( π 3 n ) 4 3 sin ( π 3 n ) .
IV. The next example offers formulas involving the binomial coefficient n + 1 / 2 n which is connected with the classical central binomial coefficient by
n + 1 / 2 n = 2 n + 1 2 2 n 2 n n .
We set
a j = 1 2 2 j 2 j j and A j = ν = 0 j a ν = j + 1 / 2 j ;
see Gould [4] (p. 14). We apply (3) with m = 0 (and with A j = ν = 0 j a ν ) and use (11). Simplifying the expressions leads to
1 n + 1 / 2 n k = 1 j = 1 n 1 j 1 / 2 j 1 k 1 2 j 2 j + 1 k .
Since
2 n n 4 n π n ( n ) ,
see Olver et al. [5] (26.3.12), we conclude from (11) that
lim n 1 n n + 1 / 2 n = 2 π .
This leads to the limit relation
lim n n k / 2 1 j = 1 n 1 j 1 / 2 j 1 k 1 2 j 2 j + 1 k = 1 2 π k
and the series formula
j = 1 1 j 1 / 2 j 1 k 1 2 j 2 j + 1 k = 1 .
V. We set
a j = 2 2 j 1 2 j 2 j j and A j = ν = 1 j a ν = 2 2 j 2 j j 1 ;
see Riordan [6] (p. 130). Then, we apply (3) with m = 0 , k = 1 . This gives
2 + 2 2 n 2 n n 1 1 = j = 2 n 2 2 j 2 j 1 2 j j 2 2 ( j 1 ) 2 ( j 1 ) j 1 1 1 2 2 j 2 j j 1 1 .
Using
2 ( j + 1 ) j + 1 = 2 ( 2 j + 1 ) j + 1 2 j j
leads to
4 + 2 2 2 n 2 n n 1 1 = j = 1 n 1 2 2 j C j 2 2 j 2 j j 1 1 2 2 ( j + 1 ) 2 ( j + 1 ) j + 1 1 1 ,
where C n = 2 n n / ( n + 1 ) denotes the n-th Catalan number. Next, we apply the asymptotic formula (12). This yields
j = 1 2 2 j C j 2 2 j 2 j j 1 1 2 2 ( j + 1 ) 2 ( j + 1 ) j + 1 1 1 = 4 .
VI. The Pochhammer symbol (or rising factorial) is defined by
( x ) n = j = 0 n 1 ( x + j ) = Γ ( x + n ) Γ ( x ) .
Let p 1 be an integer. The identity
ν = 1 n 1 ( ν ) p + 1 = 1 p · p ! 1 1 n + p p
is given in Cheon and El-Mikkawy [7]. We set
a j = a j ( p ) = 1 ( j ) p + 1 .
Then, we obtain
A j = A j ( p ) = ν = 1 j a ν = 1 p · p ! 1 1 j + p p .
Applying (4) with m = 0 gives
1 p · p ! 1 1 n + p p k = ( p + 1 ) ! k j = 2 n p · p ! 1 1 j + p p k ν = 1 k k ν 1 ( j ) p + 1 p · p ! 1 1 j 1 + p p ν .
For k = 1 , we obtain
1 1 n + p p 1 = p + 1 p p · p ! j = 2 n 1 ( j ) p + 1 1 1 j + p p 1 1 1 j 1 + p p 1 .
We let n and simplify. This leads to
1 p 2 · p ! = j = 2 1 ( j ) p + 1 1 1 j + p p 1 1 1 j 1 + p p 1 .
VII. The Bernoulli polynomials B n ( x ) are defined by the generating function
t e t x e t 1 = n = 0 B n ( x ) t n n ! .
The numbers B n = B n ( 0 ) are the well-known Bernoulli numbers.
(i) Let p 2 be an integer. We set
a j = a j ( p ) = j p 1 and A j = A j ( p ) = ν = 1 j a ν = B p ( j + 1 ) B p p ;
see Abramowitz and Stegun [8] (p. 804). Applying (4) with m = 0 gives
p B p ( n + 1 ) B p k = 1 j = 2 n p B p ( j + 1 ) B p k ν = 1 k k ν j p 1 p B p ( j ) B p ν .
For k = 1 , we get
p B p ( n + 1 ) B p = 1 p 2 j = 2 n j p 1 B p ( j + 1 ) B p B p ( j ) B p .
We let n and use lim x B p ( x ) = . Then, we obtain
1 p 2 = j = 2 j p 1 B p ( j + 1 ) B p B p ( j ) B p .
Let p 3 be odd. Then, B p = 0 . We set k = 2 and let n . Then, we conclude from (13) that
1 p 3 = 2 j = 2 j p 1 B p ( j ) B p ( j + 1 ) 2 + p j = 2 j p 1 B p ( j ) B p ( j + 1 ) 2 .
(ii) Let p 0 be even. We set
a j = a j ( p ) = ( 2 j 1 ) p and A j = A j ( p ) = ν = 1 j a ν = 2 p p + 1 B p + 1 j + 1 2 ,
see Kilar et al. [9], and apply (4) with m = 0 . This gives
p + 1 2 p B p + 1 ( n + 1 / 2 ) k = 1 j = 2 n p + 1 2 p B p + 1 ( j + 1 / 2 ) k ν = 1 k k ν ( 2 j 1 ) p ( p + 1 ) 2 p B p + 1 ( j 1 / 2 ) ν .
For k = 1 , we get
p + 1 2 p B p + 1 ( n + 1 / 2 ) = 1 ( p + 1 ) 2 4 p j = 2 n ( 2 j 1 ) p B p + 1 ( j + 1 / 2 ) B p + 1 ( j 1 / 2 ) .
If n , then
j = 2 ( 2 j 1 ) p B p + 1 ( j + 1 / 2 ) B p + 1 ( j 1 / 2 ) = 4 p ( p + 1 ) 2 .
VIII. The classical Fibonacci numbers are defined by the recurrence relation
F 0 = 0 , F 1 = 1 , F n = F n 1 + F n 2 ( n 2 ) ,
whereas the Lucas numbers are given by
L 0 = 2 , L 1 = 1 , L n = L n 1 + L n 2 ( n 2 ) .
The numbers F n and L n are related by numerous identities, like, for example,
F 2 n = F n L n , L n = F n 1 + F n + 1 = 2 F n + 1 F n .
(i) We set
a j = F j and A j = ν = 1 j F ν = F j + 2 1 ;
see Rosen at al. [10] (Section 3.1.2). Applying (3) with m = 0 gives
1 ( F n + 2 1 ) k = 1 + j = 2 n F j ( F j + 1 1 ) ( F j + 2 1 ) k ν = 0 k 1 k ν 1 F j + 2 F j ν .
In particular, for k = 1 , k = 2 , and k = 3 , we obtain the formulas
1 F n + 2 1 = 1 j = 2 n F j ( F j + 1 1 ) ( F j + 2 1 ) ,
1 ( F n + 2 1 ) 2 = 1 j = 2 n F j ( F j + 3 2 ) ( F j + 1 1 ) 2 ( F j + 2 1 ) 2 ,
1 ( F n + 2 1 ) 3 = 1 j = 2 n F j F j 2 + 3 ( F j + 1 1 ) ( F j + 2 1 ) ( F j + 1 1 ) 3 ( F j + 2 1 ) 3 .
We let n . Then, (14) leads to
j = 2 F j ( F j + 1 1 ) ( F j + 2 1 ) k ν = 0 k 1 k ν 1 F j + 2 F j ν = 1 .
For k = 1 , k = 2 , and k = 3 , we obtain
j = 2 F j ( F j + 1 1 ) ( F j + 2 1 ) = 1 ,
j = 2 F j ( F j + 3 2 ) ( F j + 1 1 ) 2 ( F j + 2 1 ) 2 = 1 ,
j = 2 F j F j 2 + 3 ( F j + 1 1 ) ( F j + 2 1 ) ( F j + 1 1 ) 3 ( F j + 2 1 ) 3 = 1 .
(ii) We set
a j = F j 2 and A j = ν = 1 j a ν = F j F j + 1 ;
see Rosen et al. [10] (Section 3.1.2). We apply (4) with m = 0 . Then,
1 ( F n F n + 1 ) k = 1 j = 2 n 1 ( F j F j + 1 ) k ν = 1 k k ν F j F j 1 ν .
For k = 2 and k = 3 , we obtain
1 F n 2 F n + 1 2 = 1 j = 2 n F j 1 + F j + 1 F j 1 2 F j F j + 1 2 ,
1 F n 3 F n + 1 3 = 1 j = 2 n 3 F j 1 F j + 1 + F j 2 F j 1 3 F j 2 F j + 1 3 .
And, if n , then
j = 2 1 F j 1 F j F j + 1 2 + j = 2 1 F j 1 2 F j F j + 1 = 1 ,
3 j = 2 1 ( F j 1 F j F j + 1 ) 2 + j = 2 1 ( F j 1 F j + 1 ) 3 = 1 .
(iii) We set
a j = ( 1 ) j F 2 j and A j = ν = 1 j a ν = ( 1 ) j F j F j + 1 ;
see Adegoke et al. [11] and Kılıç et al. [12]. Applying (3) with m = 0 gives
( 1 ) n k ( F n F n + 1 ) k = ( 1 ) k + j = 2 n ( 1 ) j L j F j 1 F j F j + 1 k ν = 0 k 1 k ν F j + 1 L j ν .
For k = 1 , we obtain
( 1 ) n F n F n + 1 = 1 + j = 2 n ( 1 ) j L j F j 1 F j F j + 1
and using
L j 2 2 L j F j + 1 = F 2 j
we get from (15) with k = 2
1 F n 2 F n + 1 2 = 1 j = 2 n F 2 j F j 1 2 F j 2 F j + 1 2 .
If n , then, (16) and (17) lead to
j = 2 ( 1 ) j L j F j 1 F j F j + 1 = 1
and
j = 2 F 2 j F j 1 2 F j 2 F j + 1 2 = 1 .
(iv) We set a j = 1 / F 2 j . Since
ν = 0 j a ν = 3 F 2 j 1 F 2 j ( j 1 ) ,
see Rabinowitz [13], we obtain
A j = ν = 1 j a ν = L 2 j 1 F 2 j .
We apply (3) with m = 0 . Then,
F 2 n L 2 n 1 k = 1 + j = 2 n F 2 j 1 L 2 j 1 1 L 2 j 1 k ν = 0 k 1 k ν ( L 2 j 1 ) ν .
We set k = 1 . This yields
F 2 n L 2 n 1 = 3 2 j = 0 n 1 F 2 j L 2 j 1 L 2 j + 1 1 .
We let n and apply the limit relation
lim n F n L n 1 = lim n 1 5 L n + 1 L n 1 + 1 = ϕ 5 ,
where ϕ = ( 1 + 5 ) / 2 is the golden ratio. Then,
1 2 5 = 1 j = 0 F 2 j L 2 j 1 L 2 j + 1 1 .
If we use (18) with k = 2 , then we obtain the formulas
F 2 n 2 L 2 n 1 2 = 5 4 + j = 0 n 1 F 2 j 2 ( 1 2 L 2 j + 1 1 ) ( L 2 j 1 L 2 j + 1 1 ) 2
and
1 2 5 = 19 20 + j = 0 F 2 j 2 ( 1 2 L 2 j + 1 1 ) ( L 2 j 1 L 2 j + 1 1 ) 2 .

Author Contributions

H.A. and R.F. both contributed to all parts of the writing of this manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

We thank the three referees for their helpful comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Anastase, F.; Díaz-Barrero, J.L. New inequalities involving Fibonacci and Lucas numbers. Arhimede Math. J. 2022, 9, 12–22. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lewin, L. Polylogarithms and Associated Functions; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  3. Milovanović, G.V.; Mitrinović, D.S.; Rassias, T.M. Topics in Polynomials: Extremal Problems, Inequalities, Zeros; World Scientific: Singapore, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gould, H.W. Combinatorial Identities: A Standardized Set of Tables Listing 500 Binomial Coefficient Summations; Taylor & Francis: Morgantown, WV, USA, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  5. Olver, F.W.J.; Lozier, D.W.; Boisvert, R.F.; Clark, C.W. (Eds.) NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions; Cambridge Univ. Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  6. Riordan, J. Combinatorial Identities; Krieger Publ. Co.: Huntington, NY, USA, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  7. Cheon, G.-S.; El-Mikkawy, M.E.A. Generalized harmonic number identities and a related matrix representation. J. Korean Math. Soc. 2007, 44, 487–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Abramowitz, M.; Stegun, I.A. (Eds.) Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables; Dover: New York, NY, USA, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kilar, N.; Bayad, A.; Simsek, Y. Finite sums involving trigonometric functions and special polynomials. Appl. Anal. Discr. Math. 2024, 18, 452–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rosen, K.H.; Michaels, J.G.; Gross, J.L.; Grossman, J.W.; Shier, D.R. Handbook of Discrete and Combinatorial Mathematics; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  11. Adegoke, K.; Frontczak, R.; Goy, T. Partial sum of the products of the Horadam numbers with subscripts in arithmetic progression. Notes Number Theory Discr. Math. 2021, 27, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kılıç, E.; Ömür, N.; Akkus, I.; Uluta, Y.T. Various sums including the generalized Fibonacci and Lucas numbers. Palestine J. Math. 2015, 4, 319–326. [Google Scholar]
  13. Rabinowitz, S. A note on the sum ∑1/wk2n. Missouri J. Math. Sci. 1998, 10, 141–146. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alzer, H.; Frontczak, R. Remarks on an Identity of Anastase and Díaz-Barrero. Axioms 2025, 14, 454. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms14060454

AMA Style

Alzer H, Frontczak R. Remarks on an Identity of Anastase and Díaz-Barrero. Axioms. 2025; 14(6):454. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms14060454

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alzer, Horst, and Robert Frontczak. 2025. "Remarks on an Identity of Anastase and Díaz-Barrero" Axioms 14, no. 6: 454. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms14060454

APA Style

Alzer, H., & Frontczak, R. (2025). Remarks on an Identity of Anastase and Díaz-Barrero. Axioms, 14(6), 454. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms14060454

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop