1. Introduction
Let
stand for the family of functions
f of the form
which are analytic in the open unit disk
. Let
S indicate the class of all functions in
which are univalent in
U.
We can say that
is called a starlike function in
U if
and a function
is called a convex function in
U if
A function
is called a Bazilevič function in
U if (see [
1])
Otherwise, a function
is called a
-pseudo-starlike function in
U if (see [
2])
The estimation of the bounds of Hankel matrices is very much in the focus of the univalent function theory. These matrices and determinants have an important role in many fields of mathematics and have several applications [
3]. Toeplitz determinants and Hankel determinants are closely related. Hankel matrices have constant entries along the reverse diagonal, while Toeplitz matrices have constant entries along the diagonal. The symmetric Toeplitz determinant
for
is defined by
where
,
and
. In particular,
and
Toeplitz determinants appear in all branches of pure and applied mathematics, including statistics and probability, image processing, quantum mechanics, queuing networks, signal processing and time series analysis. Also, Toeplitz matrices have an important role in functional analysis, applied mathematics, physics and also technical sciences (see [
3]). In recent years, several authors have established estimates of the Toeplitz determinant
for various families of univalent functions (see [
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11,
12,
13,
14,
15,
16,
17]).
In our study, we use the following lemmas to derive the desired bounds:
Lemma 1 ([
18])
. If the function is given by the series , then the sharp estimate holds. Lemma 2 ([
19])
. If the function , thenfor some with and . 2. Main Results
First of all, we defined the family in the following way:
Definition 1. A function is in the family if it satisfies the conditionwhere , , and . Theorem 1. Let be given by (1). Then,andwhere Proof. Let
. Then, there exists
such that
where
p has the following series representation:
If we equate the coefficients in (
3), these relations follow:
and
Considering (
4), (
5) and (
6), after simplifying, we find that
and
where
and
N are given by (
2). By applying Lemma 1, we obtain
and
□
Theorem 2. Let be given by (1). Then,where are given by (2). Proof. Considering (
7), (
8) and (
2), it is easy to see that
By applying Lemma 2 to express
in terms of
, we obtain
To simplify the notation, we chose
, and since the function
p is in the family
simultaneously, we supposed that
. Applying the triangle inequality with
, we can see that
It is obvious that on , and thus .
We can note that
has a maximum value at
, when
. It follows that
This concludes the proof. □
Remark 1. Taking and in Theorem 2, we can obtain the result which was proven by Radhika et al. [9] [Theorem 2]. Theorem 3. Let be given by (1). Then,where Proof. Applying (
8), (
9) and (
2) and using Lemma 2, we find
where
To make the notation simple, we select
, and because the function
p is simultaneously in the family
, we can assume that
. Using the triangle inequality with
and
, we obtain
We differentiate
with regard to
with the use of elementary calculus, and obtain
We find that
for
and fixed
. As a result,
is an increasing function of
. Therefore,
. Therefore,
Now, on
at
, we find
□
Remark 2. Taking and in Theorem 3, we can obtain the same result as derived by Radhika et al. [9] [Theorem 3]. Theorem 4. Let be given by (1). Then,where Proof. From (
7), (
8) and (
2), by applying Lemma 2 and some calculations, we obtain
For ease of notation, we select
, and because the function
p is simultaneously in the family
, we can assume that
without losing generality. The result is that, using the triangle inequality with
, we obtain
Hence, at
, we find
□
Remark 3. Taking and in Theorem 4, we can obtain the result which was derived by Radhika et al. [9] [Theorem 4]. Theorem 5. Let be given by (1). Then,where Proof. From (
7), (
9) and (
2) and by applying Lemma 2, we obtain
Applying triangle inequality and
, we find
Using the same methods as in Theorems 2 and 3, we obtain
Also, by using (
7), (
8), (
9) and (
2), applying Lemma 2 and taking
, we find
where
Next, we may find the maximum value of
on the closed area
. We can note that a maximum of
exists at an interior point
. Using differentiation
with regard to
, we obtain
If
,
which has the highest possible value
on
. Also, if
, we obtain
which has the highest possible value
on
. Therefore,
□
Remark 4. Taking and in Theorem 5, we can obtain the result which was obtained by Radhika et al. [9] [Theorem 5]. 3. Conclusions
The primary objective was to define a new family of holormorphic functions, associating the Bazilevič functions and the -pseudo-starlike functions. We generated Taylor–Maclaurin coefficient estimates for the first four determinants of the Toeplitz matrices , , and for the functions belonging to this newly introduced family. Moreover, the results obtained may provide an opportunity for researchers to find the determinants of the Toeplitz matrices for functions of other families.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, A.K.W., S.A.S. and Á.O.P.-S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.K.W. and S.A.S.; writing—review and editing, Á.O.P.-S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Data Availability Statement
No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Singh, R. On Bazilevič functions. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 1973, 38, 261–271. [Google Scholar]
- Babalola, K.O. On λ-pseudo-starlike functions. J. Class. Anal. 2013, 3, 137–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, K.; Lim, L.-H. Every matrix is a product of Toeplitz matrices. Found. Comput. Math. 2016, 16, 577–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allu, V.; Lecko, A.; Thomas, D.K. Hankel, Toeplitz, and Hermitian-Toeplitz determinants for certain close-to-convex functions. Mediterr. J. Math. 2022, 19, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buyankara, M.; Çaglar, M. Hankel and Toeplitz determinants for a subclass of analytic functions. Mat. Stud. 2023, 60, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cotîrlǎ, L.-I.; Wanas, A.K. Symmetric Toeplitz matrices for a new family of prestarlike functions. Symmetry 2022, 14, 1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Firoz, M.A.; Thomas, D.K.; Allu, V. Toeplitz determinants whose elements are the coefficients of analytic and univalent functions. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 2018, 97, 253–264. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Khafaji, N.; Al-Fayadh, A.; Hussain, A.H.; Abbas, S.A. Toeplitz determinant whose its entries are the coefficients for class of non-bazilevic functions. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2020, 1660, 012091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radhika, V.; Sivasubramanian, S.; Murugusundaramoorthy, G.; Jahangiri, J.M. Toeplitz matrices whose elements are the coefficients of functions with bounded boundary rotation. J. Complex Anal. 2016, 2016, 4960704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radhika, V.; Sivasubramanian, S.; Murugusundaramoorthy, G.; Jahangiri, J.M. Toeplitz matrices whose elements are coefficients of Bazilevič functions. Open Math. 2018, 16, 1161–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramachandran, C.; Annamalai, S. On Hankel and Toeplitz determinants for some special class of analytic functions involving conical domains defined by subordination. Int. J. Eng. Res. 2016, 5, 553–561. [Google Scholar]
- Ramachandran, C.; Kavitha, D. Toeplitz determinant for some subclasses of analytic functions. Glob. J. Pure Appl. Math. 2017, 13, 785–793. [Google Scholar]
- Srivastava, H.M.; Ahmad, Q.Z.; Khan, N.; Khan, N.; Khan, B. Hankel and Toeplitz Determinants for a Subclass of q-Starlike Functions Associated with a General Conic Domain. Mathematics 2019, 7, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, H.; Khan, S.; Hussain, S.; Khan, N. Hankel and Toeplitz determinant for a subclass of multivalent q-starlike functions of order α. AIMS Math 2021, 6, 5421–5439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wahid, N.H.A.A.; Mohamad, D. Toeplitz determinant for a subclass of tilted starlike functions with respect to conjugate points. Sains Malays. 2021, 50, 3745–3751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wanas, A.K.; Sakar, F.M.; Oros, G.I.; Cotîrlǎ, L.-I. Toeplitz determinants for a certain family of analytic functions endowed with Borel distribution. Symmetry 2023, 15, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.-Y.; Srivastava, R.; Tang, H. Third-order Hankel and Toeplitz determinants for starlike functions connected with the sine function. Mathematics 2019, 7, 404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pommerenke, C. Univalent Functions; Vandenhoeck and Rupercht: Go¨ttingen, Germany, 1975. [Google Scholar]
- Grenander, U.; Szego¨, G. Toeplitz Forms and Their Applications; California Monographs in Mathematical Sciences University California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1958. [Google Scholar]
| Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).