Next Article in Journal
The Unified Description of Abstract Convexity Structures
Previous Article in Journal
Modelling Up-and-Down Moves of Binomial Option Pricing with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

On Lebesgue Constants

by
Manuel Duarte Ortigueira
1,*,† and
Gabriel Bengochea
2,†
1
UNINOVA-CTS and LASI, NOVA School of Science and Technology, NOVA University of Lisbon, Quinta da Torre, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
2
Academia de Matemáticas, Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México, Prolongación San Isidro 151, Col. San Lorenzo Tezonco, Del. Iztapalapa, Mexico City 09790, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Axioms 2024, 13(8), 505; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms13080505
Submission received: 27 May 2024 / Revised: 18 July 2024 / Accepted: 24 July 2024 / Published: 26 July 2024

Abstract

:
Simple formulae for Lebesgue constants arising in the classical Fourier series approximation are obtained. Both even and odd cases are addressed, extending Fejér’s results. Asymptotic formulae are also obtained.

1. Introduction

There are many famous important constants in mathematics, such as e (Napier’s constant or Euler’s number), π (Archimedes’ constant), 2 (Pythagoras’ constant), and γ (Euler’s constant), to cite a few [1]. In this article, we will deal with the Lebesgue constants that were introduced by H. Lebesgue as the best possible upper bound for the approximation of functions through Fourier series [2,3,4]. These numbers are usually expressed in the form
I n = 1 π 0 π | sin ( ( n + 1 / 2 ) t ) | sin ( t / 2 ) d t
where n N .
Several famous mathematicians have worked on these constants and established some properties, such as asymptotic and proposed alternative expressions. Here are some of them.
  • Fejér [5] proved the formula
    I n = 1 2 n + 1 + 2 π k = 1 n 1 k tan k π 2 n + 1 , n N ;
  • Szegö [6] contributed with the formula
    I n = 16 π 2 k = 1 j = 1 ( 2 n + 1 ) k 1 4 k 2 1 1 2 j 1 , n N ;
  • Watson [7] established the following asymptotic expression:
    lim n I n 4 π 2 ln 2 n + 1 = c
    where
    c = 8 π 2 k = 1 ln ( k ) 4 k 2 1 4 π 2 ψ 1 2 = 4 π 2 ( 2.4413238136 ) ,
    and ψ ( x ) is the digamma function;
  • Hardy [8] discovered two integral representations
    I n = 4 0 tanh ( 2 n + 1 ) x tanh x 1 π 2 + 4 x 2 d x = 0 sinh ( 2 n + 1 ) x sinh x ln coth 2 n + 1 2 x d x .
    Later, other mathematicians contributed with two-sided estimates. Zhao [9] discovered bilateral inequalities that help improve Watson’s asymptotic expansion formulae. In [3], new inequalities for the Lebesgue constants I n / 2 were established, which allowed the authors to obtain an asymptotic expansion of I n / 2 in terms of 1 n + 1 . More recently, other contributions have been published. Shakirov approximated the Lebesgue constant using a logarithmic function [10] and using the logarithmic–fractional–rational function [4]. The asymptotic behavior of I n was also studied in [11], although indirectly, since the authors studied the properties of the Dirichlet kernel, which is related to the integrand function appearing in (8). It must be remarked that (1) can be rewritten in the form
    I n = 2 π 0 π / 2 | sin ( ( 2 n + 1 ) t ) | sin ( t ) d t
    where n N . As 2 n + 1 , n N , is an odd integer, we are interested in treating the even case too. Therefore, the main goals of the paper are as follows:
  • Consider the more general expression
    I n = 2 π 0 π / 2 | sin ( n t ) | sin ( t ) d t , n N ,
    keeping the designation “Lebesgue constants”;
  • Reproduce Fejér’s results using a simpler approach;
  • Obtain simple asymptotic formulae.
Below, we describe the steps involved in obtaining Fejér’s formula for Lebesgue numbers of any integer order. The main idea is expressed in the decomposition of the function | s i n ( n t ) | into a finite, well-defined, sum of copies of the same “bump” function (Section 3.1). Then, all that is needed is to integrate such a finite sum and simplify the resulting expression. We consider, separately, the even case ( n = 2 N ), obtaining a new formula stated in (15), and the odd case ( n = 2 N + 1 ), where we reobtain Fejér’s formula (23). Finally, asymptotic formulae are proposed. For them, we study the odd-order case first and deduce the even case from it. The asymptotic properties of the Dirichlet kernel are used [12].
The manuscript is structured as follows. Section 2 contains some important results that will help us find exact closed formulae for (8). In particular, we express the Dirichlet kernel as a finite trigonometric sum. In Section 3, we deduce the formulae that extend the Fejér result. Finally, the asymptotic formulae are studied in Section 4.

2. The Way to the Lebesgue Constants

Lebesgue studied the approximation of periodic functions by means of the partial sum of the Fourier series [2] and obtained a formulation that can be stated as follows [11].
Theorem 1. 
Let f ( t ) be a periodic continuous function on [ π , π ] , and
C k = 1 2 π π π f ( t ) e i k t d t ,
The Fourier coefficients, where i = 1 . If S n ( f ) , n N , denote the n th partial sum of f ( t ) , that is,
S n ( f ) = k = n n C k e i k t ,
Then,
S n ( f ) = 1 2 π π π D n ( τ ) f ( t τ ) d τ ,
where
D n ( t ) = sin ( ( n + 1 / 2 ) t ) sin ( t / 2 ) t 0 2 n + 1 t = 0
is the so-called Dirichlet kernel.
This theorem shows the importance of the Dirichlet kernel and the relation with the Lebesgue constants. Lebesgue showed the following.
Corollary 1. 
If
max π t π f ( t ) 1 ,
then
max π t π | S n ( f ) | 1 2 π π π | D n ( t ) | d t ,
where 1 2 π π π | D n ( t ) | d t is the best possible upper bound.
The Dirichlet kernel verifies the following relation [11]:
4 + 8 π ln n + 1 2 π π D n ( t ) d t 2 π + 4 + 8 π ln ( 2 n ) ,
which can be used to find the asymptotic behavior of the Lebesgue constants. As referred above, we consider the general expression stated in (8).
We propose an alternative approach that leads to exact closed formulae corresponding to any positive value of n N . In the following picture (see Figure 1), we show the result of the numerical integration of (8) for n = 1 , 2 , 3 , 2 L , with L = 16 . We used a log-scale.
We continue by establishing a result that will be useful in a later section. Let us define the Dirichlet-like kernel given by
D ¯ n ( t ) = sin ( n t ) sin ( t )
Theorem 2. 
The Dirichlet-like kernel can be expressed as
D ¯ n ( t ) = sin ( n t ) sin ( t ) = e i ( n 1 ) t + e i ( n 3 ) t + + e i ( n 3 ) t + e i ( n 1 ) t
Proof. 
The proof is immediate. We only need to note that
sin ( n t ) sin ( t ) = e i n t e i n t e i t e i t = e i ( n 1 ) t 1 e i 2 n t 1 e i 2 t
and apply the geometric sum rule. □
The exponents in (13) have the generic form i ( n ( 2 k 1 ) ) t , k = 1 , 2 , . Only if n is odd can it assume the value 0. This results in the following consequence.
Corollary 2. 
Let
N = n 1 2 , if n is odd n 2 , if n is even .
Then,
D ¯ n ( t ) = sin ( n t ) sin ( t ) = 1 + 2 k = 1 N cos ( 2 k t ) if n is odd 2 k = 1 N cos ( ( 2 k 1 ) t ) if n is even .
This expression is suitable for obtaining the primitive of D ¯ n ( t ) .

3. New Formulation

3.1. Preliminaries

Let us conduct a brief study of the kernel that will help us find the solution we are looking for. Consider the function
f ( t ) = | sin ( n t ) | , 0 t π / 2 ,
where the sinusoid sin ( n t ) has the frequency n 2 π and half-period T = π n . Therefore, in the interval 0 t π / 2 , there are N half periods. If n is odd, there is another quarter period. In the half periods with orders 0 , 2 , 4 , the function sin ( n t ) is positive. In the others, it is negative (see Figure 2).
Therefore, the presence of the absolute value in f ( t ) allows us to write
f ( t ) = m = 0 N f m ( t ) ,
where
f m ( t ) = f m 1 ( t T ) , m T t < ( m + 1 ) T , m = 1 , 2 , N 1 ,
with f 0 ( t ) = sin ( n t ) , 0 t < T , and the last term ( m = N ) .
f N ( t ) = f N 1 ( t T ) , N T t < N T + T / 2 , if N is odd 0 , if N is even .
This means that f ( t ) is obtained by juxtaposing N positive half periods of sin ( n t ) . If n is odd, we have to join another one quarter of a period.

3.2. The Even n Case

Theorem 3. 
Let n N be an even number. Then,
I n = 4 π k = 1 n / 2 tan ( 2 k 1 ) π 2 n 2 k 1 .
Proof. 
According to the structure of the numerator of our kernel, we can write
I n = 2 π m = 0 N 1 m T ( m + 1 ) T sin ( n ( t m T ) ) sin ( t ) d t
Attending to
sin ( n t ) = sin ( n ( t + m T m T ) ) = sin ( n ( t + m T ) m π ) = ( 1 ) m sin ( n ( t + m T ) ) ,
we are led to
I n = 2 π m = 0 N 1 ( 1 ) m 0 T sin ( n ( t + m T ) ) sin ( t + m T ) d t ,
which expresses the Lebesgue numbers in a new different way.
To continue, we need to find the primitive of the integrand, which is not a big task. In fact, as we saw above,
sin ( n x ) sin ( x ) = 2 k = 1 N cos ( ( 2 k 1 ) x ) .
It follows that
P n ( x ) = sin ( n x ) sin x d x = 2 k = 1 N sin ( ( 2 k 1 ) x ) 2 k 1 .
For our application, x = t + m T , so that
P n ( t ) = sin ( n ( t + m T ) ) sin ( t + m T ) d t = 2 k = 1 n / 2 sin ( ( 2 k 1 ) ( t + m T ) ) 2 k 1 .
Let us denote the function in brackets in (18) by J m ( n ) . We have
I n = 2 π m = 0 N 1 ( 1 ) m J m ( n ) .
with
J m ( n ) = 0 T sin ( n ( t + m T ) ) sin ( t + m T ) d t = P n ( T ) P n ( 0 ) ,
where T = π / n . Then, m T = π m n , T + m T = ( m + 1 ) π n , and
J m ( n ) = 2 k = 1 N sin ( ( 2 k 1 ) ( m + 1 ) π / n ) 2 k 1 2 k = 1 N sin ( ( 2 k 1 ) m π / n ) 2 k 1 .
Simplifying
J m ( n ) = 2 k = 1 N sin ( ( 2 k 1 ) ( m + 1 ) π / n ) sin ( ( 2 k 1 ) m π / n ) 2 k 1 ,
and using the trigonometric identity sin ( A ) sin ( B ) = 2 cos A + B 2 sin A B 2 , we obtain
J m ( n ) = 4 k = 1 N cos ( ( 2 k 1 ) ( 2 m + 1 ) π / ( 2 n ) ) sin ( ( 2 k 1 ) π / ( 2 n ) ) 2 k 1 .
That inserted into (21) gives the expected result. However, we can manipulate these formulae in an attempt to achieve any simplification. We proceed to reverse the summation order:
m = 0 N 1 ( 1 ) m k = 1 N cos ( ( 2 k 1 ) ( 2 m + 1 ) π / ( 2 n ) ) sin ( ( 2 k 1 ) π / ( 2 n ) ) 2 k 1 = k = 1 N sin ( ( 2 k 1 ) π / ( 2 n ) ) 2 k 1 m = 0 N 1 ( 1 ) m cos ( 2 k 1 ) ( 2 m + 1 ) π / ( 2 n )
By replacing a sinusoid with exponentials and using the sum rule of the geometric sequence, we can show that
m = 0 N 1 ( 1 ) m cos ( 2 k 1 ) ( 2 m + 1 ) π / ( 2 n ) = 1 ( 1 ) N cos N n ( 2 k 1 ) π 2 cos ( 2 k 1 ) π 2 n
Attending to the fact that 2 N = n and cos ( 2 k 1 ) π / 2 = 0 , we can write
m = 0 N 1 ( 1 ) m cos ( 2 k 1 ) ( 2 m + 1 ) π / n = 1 2 cos ( 2 k 1 ) π 2 n
and, finally, (15). □
This formula was never proposed. In Figure 3, we compare the value of I n obtained from (15) with the numerical integration of (8).

3.3. The Odd n Case

Theorem 4. 
Let n N be an odd number. Then,
I n = 2 π k = 1 ( n 1 ) / 2 tan ( k π / n ) k + 1 n
This formula was proposed first by Fejér but deduced using a completely different procedure [5].
Proof. 
Let n = 2 N + 1 . Unlike the even n case, we have
I n = 2 π m = 0 N 1 m T ( m + 1 ) T sin ( n ( t m T ) ) sin ( t ) d t + 2 π N T N T + T / 2 sin ( n ( t N T ) ) sin ( t ) d t .
We joined an extra quarter of a period.
Using (17), the second term on the right of the equality is
N T N T + T / 2 sin ( n ( t N T ) ) sin ( t ) d t = 0 T / 2 sin ( n t ) sin ( t + N T ) d t = 0 T / 2 ( 1 ) N sin ( n ( t + N T ) ) sin ( t + N T ) d t
and
I n = 2 π m = 0 N 1 ( 1 ) m 0 T sin ( n ( t + m T ) ) sin ( t + m T ) d t + 0 T / 2 ( 1 ) N sin ( n ( t + N T ) ) sin ( t + N T ) d t ,
which re-expresses the Lebesgue numbers in a new, different way.
To continue, we need to find the primitive of the integrand, which is not a big task given (14). In fact, we have
sin ( n x ) sin ( x ) = 1 + 2 k = 1 ( n 1 ) / 2 cos 2 k x ,
It follows that
P n ( x ) = sin ( n x ) sin x d x = k = 1 ( n 1 ) / 2 sin 2 k x k + x .
For our application, x = t + m T , so that
P n ( t ) = sin ( n ( t + m T ) ) sin ( t + m T ) d t = k = 1 N sin 2 k ( t + m T ) k + ( t + m T ) .
As above, let us denote the function in brackets in (25) by J m ( n ) and the second term by J N ( n ) so that
I n = 2 π m = 0 N 1 ( 1 ) m J m ( n ) + 2 π J N ( n )
with
J m ( n ) = 0 T sin ( n ( t + m T ) ) sin ( t + m T ) d t = P n ( T ) P n ( 0 ) ,
and
J N ( n ) = 0 T / 2 sin ( n ( t + m T ) ) sin ( t + m T ) d t = P n ( T / 2 ) P n ( 0 ) .
As T = π / n , then m T = π m n , T + m T = ( m + 1 ) π n , and
J m ( n ) = k = 1 N sin 2 k ( m + 1 ) π / n k + ( m + 1 ) π n k = 1 N sin ( 2 k m π / n ) k + m π n .
We obtain
J m ( n ) = k = 1 N sin 2 k ( m + 1 ) π / n sin ( 2 k m π / n ) k + π n .
Using the trigonometric identity sin ( A ) sin ( B ) = 2 cos A + B 2 sin A B 2 ,
J m ( n ) = 2 k = 1 N cos k ( 2 m + 1 ) π / n sin ( k π / n ) k + π n .
Concerning the other term, J N ( n ) , we have
J N ( n ) = k = 1 N sin 2 k ( T / 2 + N T ) k + ( T / 2 + N T ) k = 1 N sin ( 2 k N π / n ) k N T .
But n = 2 N + 1 and T n = π , allowing a simplification of the above expression:
J N ( n ) = k = 1 N ( 1 ) k sin ( k π / n ) k + π 2 n .
Let us manipulate these formulae trying to achieve simplifications. We turn our attention to (27)–(29). Then,
I n = 4 π m = 0 N 1 ( 1 ) m k = 1 N cos k ( 2 m + 1 ) π / n sin ( k π / n ) k + 2 π ( 1 ) N k = 1 N ( 1 ) k sin ( k π / n ) k + 2 n m = 0 N 1 ( 1 ) m + ( 1 ) N 1 n ,
or
I n = 4 π m = 0 N 1 ( 1 ) m k = 1 N cos k ( 2 m + 1 ) π / n sin ( k π / n ) k + 2 π ( 1 ) N k = 1 N ( 1 ) k sin ( k π / n ) k + 1 n .
Let us change the summation order in the first term on the right in expression (30):
m = 0 N 1 ( 1 ) m k = 1 N cos k ( 2 m + 1 ) π / n sin ( k π / n ) k = k = 1 N sin ( k π / n ) k m = 0 N 1 ( 1 ) m cos k ( 2 m + 1 ) π / n .
Observe that
m = 0 N 1 ( 1 ) m cos k ( 2 m + 1 ) π / n = 1 ( 1 ) N cos 2 N n k π 2 cos k π n .
But, 2 N = n 1 , so that
cos 2 N n k π = cos 1 1 n k π = ( 1 ) k cos k π n .
Hence,
m = 0 N 1 ( 1 ) m cos k ( 2 m + 1 ) π / n = 1 ( 1 ) N + k cos k π n 2 cos k π n = 1 2 cos k π n ( 1 ) N + k 1 2 ,
which leads to
m = 0 N 1 ( 1 ) m k = 1 N cos k ( 2 m + 1 ) π / n sin ( k π / n ) k = 1 2 k = 1 N sin ( k π / n ) k 1 cos k π / n ( 1 ) N + k = 1 2 k = 1 N tan ( k π / n ) k ( 1 ) N 2 k = 1 N ( 1 ) k sin ( k π / n ) k .
Inserting it into (30), we obtain
I n = 2 π k = 1 N tan ( k π / n ) k 2 π ( 1 ) N k = 1 N ( 1 ) k sin ( k π / n ) k + 2 π ( 1 ) N k = 1 N ( 1 ) k sin ( k π / n ) k + 1 n .
Finally, we obtain (23). □
In Figure 4, we compare (23) with the integral representation of I n (8).
To make a comparison of the two situations, let us return and rewrite the two expressions for I n , for n = 2 N and n = 2 N + 1 , with 1 < N N . For each N, we obtain
I 2 N = 4 π k = 1 N tan ( 2 k 1 ) π 2 n 2 k 1 I 2 N + 1 = 4 π k = 1 N tan ( 2 k π 2 n ) 2 k + 1 2 N + 1 .
It is interesting to remark the important fact that the first summation involves odd samples of the function tan ( π x ) x , while the second involves even samples.

4. Asymptotic Behavior

Let us consider the odd n case first and turn our attention to (27):
I n = 2 π m = 0 N 1 ( 1 ) m k = 1 N sin 2 k ( m + 1 ) π / n sin ( 2 k m π / n ) k + π n + 2 π k = 1 N ( 1 ) k sin ( k π / n ) k + π 2 n .
Using the formula ([12]),
k = 1 N sin ( k x ) k = 1 2 0 x D N ( t ) 1 d t ,
where
D N ( t ) = sin ( ( N + 1 / 2 ) t ) sin ( t / 2 ) ,
we have
k = 1 N sin 2 k ( m + 1 ) π / n sin ( 2 k m π / n ) k = 1 2 0 2 ( m + 1 ) π / n D N ( t ) 1 d t 1 2 0 2 m π / n D N ( t ) 1 d t .
It follows that
m = 0 N 1 ( 1 ) m k = 1 N sin 2 k ( m + 1 ) π / n sin ( 2 k m π / n ) k = 1 2 0 2 π / n D N ( t ) 1 d t 1 2 2 π / n 4 π / n D N ( t ) 1 d t + + 1 2 ( 1 ) N 1 2 ( N 1 ) π / n 2 N π / n D N ( t ) 1 d t = 1 2 0 2 π / n D N ( t ) d t 2 π / n 4 π / n D N ( t ) d t + + ( 1 ) N 1 2 ( N 1 ) π / n 2 N π / n D N ( t ) d t + min ( 0 , ( 1 ) N 1 ) π n .
It is not difficult to observe that
( 4 k 2 ) π / n 4 k π / n D N ( t ) d t = ( 4 k 2 ) π / n 4 k π / n | D N ( t ) | d t ,
where 1 k N / 2 if N is even or 1 k ( N 1 ) / 2 if N is odd. Then,
m = 0 N 1 ( 1 ) m k = 1 N sin 2 k ( m + 1 ) π / n sin ( 2 k m π / n ) k = 1 2 0 2 N π / n | D N ( t ) | d t + min ( 0 , ( 1 ) N 1 ) π n .
It follows that
I n = 2 π 1 2 0 2 N π / n | D N ( t ) | d t + min ( 0 , ( 1 ) N 1 ) π n + 2 π k = 1 N ( 1 ) k sin ( k π / n ) k + π 2 n .
Using the Fourier series theory, we know that the series
k = 1 ( 1 ) k sin ( k x ) k = x 2 , π < x < π ,
converges absolutely in any closed interval in ( π , π ) . This implies that
lim n k = 1 N ( 1 ) k sin ( k π / n ) k = 0 .
On the other hand, lim n 2 N π / n = π . Then, for high values of n,
1 π 0 2 N π / n | D N ( t ) | d t 1 π 0 π | D N ( t ) | d t = 1 2 π π π | D N ( t ) | d t .
Finally, when n we obtain that [11]
I n 1 2 π π π | D N ( t ) | d t = 4 π 2 ln ( n 1 ) + O ( 1 ) ,
where
0 O ( 1 ) 1 + 2 π + 4 π 2 ln ( 2 ) .
In Figure 5, we depict the extreme case when O ( 1 ) = 1 + 2 π + 4 π 2 ln ( 2 ) in (43).
For even n cases we only need to observe that I n is a increasing function [6]; then, I n I n + 1 with n + 1 odd. From (43), we obtain that
I n 4 π 2 ln ( n ) + O ( 1 ) ,
where
0 O ( 1 ) 1 + 2 π + 4 π 2 ln ( 2 ) .
In Figure 6, we show the extreme case when O ( 1 ) = 1 + 2 π + 4 π 2 ln ( 2 ) in (45).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.D.O.; methodology, M.D.O. and G.B.; formal analysis, M.D.O.; investigation, M.D.O. and G.B.; writing—original draft preparation, M.D.O.; writing—review and editing, M.D.O. and G.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The first author was partially funded by National Funds through the Foundation for Science and Technology of Portugal, under projects UIDB/00066/2020. The second author was funded by the Autonomous University of Mexico City under project UACM CCYT-CON-03.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Finch, S. Mathematical Constants; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lebesgue, H. Sur la représentation trigonométrique approchée des fonctions satisfaisant à une condition de Lipschitz. Société Mathématique Fr. 1910, 38, 184–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chen, C.; Choi, J. Inequalities and asymptotic expansions for the constants of Landau and Lebesgue. Appl. Math. Comput. 2014, 248, 610–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shakirov, I.A. Approximation of the Lebesgue constant of the Fourier operator by a logarithmic-fractional-rational function. Russ. Math. 2023, 67, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fejér, L. Sur les singularités de la série de Fourier des fonctions continues. In Annales Scientifiques de L’École Normale Supérieure; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1911; Volume 28, pp. 63–104. [Google Scholar]
  6. Szego, G. Über die Lebesgueschen konstanten bei den Fourierschen reihen. Math. Z. 1921, 9, 163–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Watson, G. The constants of Landau and Lebesgue. Quart. J. Math. 1930, 1, 310–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hardy, G. Note on Lebesgue’s constants in the theory of Fourier series. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 1942, 1, 4–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhao, D. Some sharp estimates of the constants of Landau and Lebesgue. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2009, 349, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shakirov, I. Approximation of the Lebesgue constant of the Fourier operator by a logarithmic function. Russ. Math. 2022, 66, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Alvarez, J.; Guzmán-Partida, M. Properties of the Dirichlet kernel. Electron. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2023, 11, 96–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Stein, E.; Shakarchi, R. Fourier Analysis: An Introduction; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2011; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Examples for n = 1 , 2 , .
Figure 1. Examples for n = 1 , 2 , .
Axioms 13 00505 g001
Figure 2. Representations of D ¯ n ( t ) and | D ¯ n ( t ) | for n = 8 , 13 , 18 , 23 . .
Figure 2. Representations of D ¯ n ( t ) and | D ¯ n ( t ) | for n = 8 , 13 , 18 , 23 . .
Axioms 13 00505 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of (15) (red) with numerical integration of (8) (black).
Figure 3. Comparison of (15) (red) with numerical integration of (8) (black).
Axioms 13 00505 g003
Figure 4. Comparison of (23) (red) with (8) (black).
Figure 4. Comparison of (23) (red) with (8) (black).
Axioms 13 00505 g004
Figure 5. Extreme case for odd n, when O ( 1 ) = 1 + 2 π + 4 π 2 ln ( 2 ) .
Figure 5. Extreme case for odd n, when O ( 1 ) = 1 + 2 π + 4 π 2 ln ( 2 ) .
Axioms 13 00505 g005
Figure 6. Extreme case for even n, when O ( 1 ) = 1 + 2 π + 4 π 2 ln ( 2 ) .
Figure 6. Extreme case for even n, when O ( 1 ) = 1 + 2 π + 4 π 2 ln ( 2 ) .
Axioms 13 00505 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ortigueira, M.D.; Bengochea, G. On Lebesgue Constants. Axioms 2024, 13, 505. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms13080505

AMA Style

Ortigueira MD, Bengochea G. On Lebesgue Constants. Axioms. 2024; 13(8):505. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms13080505

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ortigueira, Manuel Duarte, and Gabriel Bengochea. 2024. "On Lebesgue Constants" Axioms 13, no. 8: 505. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms13080505

APA Style

Ortigueira, M. D., & Bengochea, G. (2024). On Lebesgue Constants. Axioms, 13(8), 505. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms13080505

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop