1. Introduction
There are a number of alternative theories of gravity to General Relativity (GR). The 
-type teleparallel theories of gravity are very promising [
1,
2,
3]. In these theories, the geometry is characterized by the torsion which is a function of the coframe, 
, derivatives of the coframe, and a zero curvature and metric compatible spin-connection one-form 
. Hence, in teleparallel gravity, it is necessary to work with a frame basis instead of a metric tensor. In such theories the role of symmetry is no longer as clearly defined as in pseudo-Riemannian geometry, where symmetry is defined in terms of an isometry of the metric or Killing Vectors (KVs). In GR, the Riemannian geometry is completely defined by the curvature of a Levi-Civita connection and calculated from the metric. But this is not really the case for some alternative theories, in particular for teleparallel 
-type gravity.
The development of a frame-based approach for determining the symmetries of a spacetime has been explored [
4,
5,
6]. A possible complication arises due to the possible existence of a non-trivial linear isotropy group: a Lie group of Lorentz frame transformations keeping the associated tensors of the geometry invariant. If a given spacetime has a non-trivial linear isotropy group, determining the group of symmetries requires solving a set of inhomogeneous differential equations [
7]:
      where 
 is the orthonormal coframe basis, 
 is a Lie algebra generator of Lorentz transformations and 
 are the components of the spin connection.
In ref. [
8], Coley et al. introduced a new approach to determine the symmetries of any geometry based on an independent frame and connection which admits the torsion tensor and the curvature tensor as geometric objects. In these theories, the connection is an independent object. They call any geometry where the non-metricity and curvature tensors vanish a 
teleparallel geometry. The approach relies on the existence of a particular class of invariantly defined frames known as symmetry frames, which facilitates solving the differential equations arising from Equation (
1), by fixing the 
 in an invariant way.
This assumes an orthonormal frame where the gauge metric is 
. The spin connection, 
, is defined in terms of an arbitrary Lorentz transformation, 
, through the equation
      
A particular subclass of teleparallel gravitational theories is dynamically equivalent to GR and is called the Teleparallel Equivalent to General Relativity (TEGR), which is based on a torsion scalar 
T constructed from the torsion tensor [
1]. The most common generalization of TEGR is 
-type teleparallel gravity, where 
F is an arbitrary function of the torsion scalar 
T [
9,
10,
11]. In the 
covariant approach to 
-type gravity, the teleparallel geometry is defined in a gauge-invariant manner as a geometry where the spin connection has zero curvature and zero non-metricity. The spin connection will vanish in the special class of proper frames, and will be non-zero in all other frames [
1,
3,
12]. Therefore, the resulting teleparallel gravity theory has Lorentz covariant FEs and is locally Lorentz invariant [
13]. A proper frame is not invariantly defined since it is defined in terms of the connection, which is not a tensorial quantity, which leads to a number of problems when using such a frame to determine symmetries.
There are several papers in the literature about static and non-static spherically symmetric solutions in teleparallel 
 gravity [
14,
15,
16,
17,
18,
19,
20,
21,
22,
23,
24,
25,
26,
27,
28,
29]. There are several perturbative solutions in TEGR (Teleparallel Equivalent of General Relativity) and there are some power-law 
 solutions with power-law frame components (see [
14,
15,
16,
17] and references within). These papers essentially use the Weitzenback gauge (leading to proper frames) because the antisymmetric FEs are trivially satisfied, but there are arising some extra degrees of freedom (DoFs) by imposing the zero spin connection. This requirement leads to only symmetric parts of FEs and the presented solutions are essentially limited to power-law in 
 and frame components by using a complex coframe. Beyond these considerations, even if the symmetric parts of FEs and their solutions are similar between the different gauges, the fact remains that the extra DoF potential issue associated with the proper frame should be resolved by a frame changing. For this requirement, it is necessary to go towards a frame where the spin connections can be found by solving the non-trivial antisymmetric parts of FEs. From there, all the DoFs will be covered by all the FEs and the solutions will be found by a non-trivial approach for the spin-connection and coframe components and then for the 
 solutions.
For rectifying this extra DoF potential issue and going further than power-law 
 solutions, there is a paper on general teleparallel spherically symmetric geometries with an emphasis on vacuum solutions and possible additional symmetry structures [
18]. They found the general FEs in an orthonormal gauge assuming a diagonal frame and a non-trivial spin connection, leading to specific antisymmetric parts of FEs and then to well-determined symmetric parts of FEs without extra DoFs. There are some specific symmetry structures such as static (radial coordinate dependent), Kantowski–Sacks (KS) (time coordinate dependent) and an additional affine symmetry called 
. For static geometries, the study is restricted to find the 
 solutions in the vacuum. They found more power-law solutions, but also more general 
 solutions such as products, quotient, exponential and/or a mix of these type of functions. In this case, the 
 symmetry will be defined by the time-coordinate derivative 
 leading to radial coordinate dependence for coframes, spin connections and FEs.
For non-vacuum spherically symmetric 
 solutions, there are in principle several possible types of energy-momentum sources. The most interesting are the perfect isotropic cosmological and astrophysical fluids, and there are some teleparallel 
 solutions such as Bahamonde and Camci’s [
20]. In this paper, there are some specific power-law 
 solutions leading to some specific types of fluid where they find specific expressions for 
P and 
. But this type of approach is restrictive because this supposes first a power-law 
 solution and then they look for possible 
 and 
P. Alternatively, for finding new solutions, a different approach would assume an energy-momentum source with an equation of state (EoS) (relation between 
P and 
 as 
) and then find all possible 
 solutions satisfying the FEs with these EoS relations.
For this paper, we assume a static (
r-coordinate dependent) spherically symmetric teleparallel geometry in an orthonormal gauge as defined in ref. [
18]. We will focus on finding non-vacuum static spherically symmetric teleparallel 
 solutions. After a brief summary of the static spherically symmetric teleparallel geometry and FEs in 
Section 2, we will find in 
Section 3 several possible 
 solutions for the linear and isotropic perfect fluids. In 
Section 4, we will do the same with a dust fluid, because this special case arises from the conservation laws. In 
Section 5, we will solve FEs and find some 
 solutions for a non-linear perfect fluid.
We will use the notation as follows: the coordinate indices are 
 and the tangent space indices are 
 as in ref. [
8]. The spacetime coordinates will be 
. The frame fields are denoted as 
 and the dual coframe one-forms are 
. The vierbein components are 
 or 
. The spacetime metric is 
 and the Minkowski tangent space metric is 
. For a local Lorentz transformation leaving 
 unchanged, we write 
. The spin-connection one-form 
 is defined as 
. The curvature and torsion tensors are, respectively, 
 and 
. Covariant derivatives with respect to a metric-compatible connection are denoted using a semi-colon, 
.
  3. Perfect Linear Fluid Solutions
As the first case of a non-vacuum solution with an isotropic fluid having a linear EoS, we have 
 with 
 and 
 (i.e., 
), the static perfect cosmological fluid case. First, Equation (
15) will simplify as follows [
18]:
      where 
. By integration, we find as a solution for Equation (
17) the following:
In a such case, the density of the fluid 
 is directly dependent on 
 for 
 and the energy condition constraints to satisfy 
 for positive mass density. For 
 (dust fluid), we will need to solve this case separately to avoid the singular solution for Equation (
18). If we set an ansatz for the 
, 
 will depend directly on this same ansatz according to the conservation laws. But since 
 depends only on 
, one can in principle perform a coordinate change 
 for going to a frame where we have a constant and positive fluid density 
 [
18].
Then, although Equation (
14a) remains unchanged, Equations (
16b) and (
16c) will simplify as follows:
      
With Equations (
19a) and (
19b), we can put them together eliminating 
 to finally have a relation linking 
 and 
:
The torsion scalar is as follows:
There are a number of possible approaches for solutions to the FEs described by Equations (
14a), (
19a), (
19b) and (
21) added by the conservation law solution described by Equation (
18). The main goal is to find several possible 
 solutions from these previous equations. For this purpose, we will solve for 
 constant and 
 as in ref. [
18]. We can do this because there is a set of coordinates where 
 is valuable without any loss of generality and the constant 
 system is the exception to this rule. This consideration is only for a local coordinate definition. The constant 
 case is an exception because we cannot perform a local transformation allowing this to change into a non-constant term. All other non-constant 
 can be changed by a local transformation into an 
 system.
  3.1. Constant  Field Equation Solutions
By setting 
 constant in our FEs, Equations (
14a), (
19a) and (
19b) become the following with Equation (
A2) components:
        
Equation (
21) for torsion scalar becomes the following:
  3.1.1. Power-Law Solutions
We will solve Equations (
22a)–(
22c) by using the following ansatz:
In the supplement, Equation (
18) from the conservation laws becomes the following:
          where 
 and 
. Equations (
22a)–(
23) become the following:
          
For setting Equations (
26a)–(
26c) in terms of torsion scalar 
T, we isolate 
 from Equation (
26d):
By substituting Equation (
27) into Equations (
26a)–(
26c) and by simplifying Equation (
26a), we obtain the following:
          
By putting Equations (
28b) and (
28c) and then by substituting Equation (
28a), we find the following as a solution for 
:
          where 
 and 
. Equation (
29) is a new non-trivial 
 teleparallel solution arising from the 
 constant case. Then, Equation (
25) for the fluid density in terms of 
T will be expressed as follows:
          where 
. Therefore, Equation (
29) has two possible singularities:
: This singularity appears in two terms of Equation (
29) leading to an undefined 
 and then 
 is undefined in all situations. For fluid density, Equation (
30) will lead to the following situations:
- –
  subcase:  is undefined.
- –
  subcase: , the vacuum situation.
Then, Equation (
27) will lead to the following situations:
- –
  subcase:  is undefined.
- –
  subcase: : a point-like singularity.
: This singularity only occurs for 
 and 
. For Equations (
27) and (
30), there are no real consequences because we obtain definite values of 
 and 
. This is only that 
.
For 
, Equation (
29) becomes the following:
          and then Equation (
30) will simplify as follows:
          where 
. The 
 singularity is now the remaining one inside Equation (
31) and leads to an undefined 
. We obtain from Equation (
32) that the fluid density is as follows:
For Equation (
27), we find the following:
For 
 and/or 
, these are constant torsion scalar spacetime cases according to Equation (
26d) and are GR solutions.
  3.1.2. Constant  and Exponential  Solutions
Another possible ansatz for 
 solutions is 
 and 
. We replace the component 
 of the simple power-law ansatz expressed in Equation (
24) by an infinite series of power laws leading to an exponential ansatz defined as 
. We then set 
 for the component 
 of this same ansatz thus generalizing the power-law ansatz as expressed in Equation (
24). Then, Equation (
23) becomes the following:
Equations (
22a)–(
22c) become the following:
          
By putting Equations (
34b) and (
34c) together and then by substituting Equation (
34a), we find the following:
          where 
. Equation (
35) is another new non-trivial 
 teleparallel solution with 
 constant. Then, Equation (
18) for the fluid density in terms of 
T will be as follows:
          where 
 and 
. From Equation (
35), we find three singularities:
For 
, Equation (
33) will be as follows:
          where 
. Then, Equations (
34a)–(
34c) will become the following:
          
By putting Equations (
38b) and (
38c) and then by substituting Equation (
38a) inside, we find the following: 
Then, Equation (
36) for fluid density will be as follows:
          where 
 and 
. In the case of Equation (
39), the only and remaining singularity is 
 leading to an undefined 
, 
 for 
 (vacuum) and an undefined 
 for 
 according to Equation (
40), all with 
 and 
 from Equation (
37).
For 
, we obtain from Equation (
33) that the torsion scalar is constant (i.e., 
), 
 and 
 constant leading to GR solutions.
In comparison with ref. [
18], we obtain as a result for the pure vacuum case a linear 
, which is a GR solution. But for a perfect fluid with 
, we find some new and non-trivial teleparallel 
 specific solutions. These are all new teleparallel fluid non-vacuum solutions for the 
 constant class.
  3.2.  Field Equation Solutions
For 
 FEs, Equations (
14a), (
19a) and (
19b) become the following with Equation (
A3) components:
        
Equation (
21) for torsion scalar becomes the following:
There are a number of approach for solving Equations (
41a)–(
42) to find specific pure 
 new solutions in the general perfect fluid case with 
. For conservation laws, 
 is still described by Equation (
18), because 
 depends only on the 
 component.
  3.2.1. General Power-Law Field Equations
For FEs and conservation law in terms of power-law solutions, we will use the Equation (
24) ansatz in Equations (
25) and (
41a)–(
42). From there, we obtain the following:
          
          where 
 constant and 
. From Equation (
43d), we find the following characteristic eqn for 
:
From Equation (
44), we can in principle isolate for each value of 
a and 
b a relation 
 for finding a specific solution 
, which is the main aim of this rigorous work.
  3.2.2. Simple Spacetime Solutions
Before going to more complex solutions, it is important to consider the simplest case of pure flat cosmological spacetimes where 
. In this case, Equation (
44) becomes the following: 
Then, Equations (
43a)–(
43c) and Equation (
25) become the following:
          
Equations (
46a)–(
46c) are expressed in terms of 
T, 
 and 
 only. By putting Equations (
46b) and (
46c) together, we find the following:
          where 
 is an integration constant. Equation (
47) is a pure power-law solution for static simple cosmological spacetimes where 
, which is similar to Bahamonde–Camci solutions [
20]. If 
, we find that Equation (
47) will be reduced to the TEGR-like solution 
. For a pure flat null torsion spacetime, we require that 
 in Equations (
45)–(
46c), which leads to 
 and 
 constant without any other condition. If then 
, we obtain the pure Minkowski spacetime [
35].
  3.2.3. General Case Solutions
We will consider different cases according to the value of b for the general case (i.e., ):
 case: Equation (
44) will be as follows:
              
              where 
. As for the simple case presented in 
Section 3.2.2, we substitute Equation (
48) into Equations (
43a)–(
43c) by setting 
. After that, by putting Equations (
43b) and (
43c) together, and then by substituting Equation (
43a), we find the following:
              
              where 
 is a constant. Here, we have a power-law solution similar to the Bahamonde–Camci solution where 
 is described by Equation (
25) [
20]. In terms of torsion scalar, this Equation (
25) becomes the following:
              
              where 
. We have a direct density-linked 
 solution in this case.
 case: Equation (
44) will be as follows:
              
The solutions are as follows:
              
              where 
. By putting Equations (
43b) and (
43c) together and then by substituting Equations (
43a) and (
52), we find as a solution:
              
              where 
 is Equation (
52).
 case: Equation (
44) will be as follows:
              
By putting Equations (
43b) and (
43c) together and then by substituting Equations (
43a) and (
54), we find the following:
              
              where 
 is Equation (
54).
 case: Equation (
44) will be as follows:
              
Then, we will set the positive 
 case and 
. By putting Equations (
43b) and (
43c) together and then by substituting Equations (
43a) and (
56), we find the following:
              
              where 
 is Equation (
56).
  3.2.4.  Case Solutions
For solving 
 specific cases, Equation (
44) will simplify as follows:
Then, Equations (
43a)–(
43e) and (
43e) will be simplified as follows:
          
          where 
 is a constant.
From Equation (
58), there are several new subcases arising and leading to new 
 solutions for Equations (
59a)–(
59c). These subcases are as follows:
: Equation (
58) becomes the following:
              
By putting together Equations (
59b) and (
59c) and then by substituting Equations (
59a) and (
60), we obtain a power-law 
 solution:
              
              where 
 is a constant. Equation (
61) is a pure power-law solution and this is similar to the Bahamonde–Camci solution [
20].
: Equation (
58) becomes the following:
              
By putting Equations (
59b) and (
59c) together, and then by substituting Equations (
59a) and (
62), we find the following:
              
              where 
 is Equation (
62).
: Equation (
58) becomes the following:
              
              where 
. By putting Equations (
59b) and (
59c) together, and then by substituting Equations (
59a) and (
64), we obtain the following:
              
, Equation (
58) becomes the following:
              
              where 
. By putting Equations (
59b) and (
59c) together, and then by substituting Equations (
59a) and (
66), we obtain the following:
              
: Equation (
58) becomes the following:
              
              where 
. By putting Equations (
59b) and (
59c) together, and then by substituting Equations (
59a) and (
68), we obtain the following:
              
              where 
 is Equation (
68).
: Equation (
58) becomes the following:
              
By putting Equations (
59b) and (
59c) together, and then by substituting Equations (
59a) and (
70), we obtain the following:
              
              where 
 is Equation (
70).
: Equation (
58) becomes the following:
              
              where 
. By putting Equations (
59b) and (
59c) together, and then by substituting Equations (
59a) and (
72), we obtain the following:
              
              where 
 is Equation (
72).
: Equation (
58) becomes the following:
              
By putting Equations (
59b) and (
59c) together, and then by substituting Equations (
59a) and (
74), we obtain the following:
              
              where 
 is Equation (
74).
: Equation (
58) becomes the following:
              
              where 
. By putting Equations (
59b) and (
59c) together, and then by substituting Equations (
59a) and (
76), we obtain the following:
              
              where 
 is Equation (
76).
  3.2.5.  Case Solutions
For solving 
 specific cases, Equation (
44) will simplify as follows:
Equations (
43a)–(
43c) and (
43e) become the following:
          
          where 
 constant.
The possible cases are:
 case: Equation (
78) becomes the following:
              
By putting Equations (
79b) and (
79c) together, and then substituting Equations (
79a) and (
80) inside, we obtain the following:
              
              where 
 is a constant. Once again, we have a pure power-law solution as in ref. [
20].
 case: Equation (
78) becomes more simple as follows:
              
Equation (
82) leads to only one real solution for 
. By putting Equations (
79b) and (
79c) together, and then substituting Equations (
79a) and (
82) inside, we obtain the following:
              
              where 
 is described by Equation (
82).
 case: Equation (
78) becomes the following:
              
By putting Equations (
79b) and (
79c) together, and then substituting Equations (
79a) and (
84) inside, we obtain the following:
              
              where 
 is described by Equation (
84).
 case: Equation (
78) becomes the following:
              
By putting Equations (
79b) and (
79c) together, and then substituting Equations (
79a) and (
86) inside, we obtain the following:
              
              where 
 is described by Equation (
86).
 case: Equation (
78) will simplify as follows:
              
              where 
. By putting Equations (
79b) and (
79c) together, and then substituting Equations (
79a) and (
88) inside, we obtain the following:
              
              where 
 is Equation (
88).
 case: Equation (
78) becomes the following:
              
By putting Equations (
79b) and (
79c) together, and then substituting Equations (
79a) and (
90) inside, we obtain the following:
              
              where 
 is described by Equation (
90).
 case: Equation (
78) becomes the following:
              
              where 
. By putting Equations (
79b) and (
79c) together, and then substituting Equations (
79a) and (
92) inside, we obtain the following:
              
              where 
 is described by Equation (
92).
 case: Equation (
78) becomes the following:
              
By putting Equations (
79b) and (
79c) together, and then substituting Equations (
79a) and (
94) inside, we obtain the following:
              
              where 
 is described by Equation (
94).
 case: Equation (
78) becomes the following:
              
              where the possible solutions are 
. By putting Equations (
79b) and (
79c) together, and then substituting Equations (
79a) and (
96) inside, we obtain the following:
              
              where 
 is described by Equation (
96).
 case: Equation (
78) becomes the following:
              
By putting Equations (
79b) and (
79c) together, and then substituting Equations (
79a) and (
98) inside, we obtain the following:
              
              where 
 is described by Equation (
98).
 case: Equation (
78) becomes the following:
              
By putting Equations (
79b) and (
79c) together, and then substituting Equations (
79a) and (
100) inside, we obtain the following:
              
              where 
 is described by Equation (
100).
In this section, all these previous non-power-law teleparallel 
 solutions are new. We may also use several different coframe ansatz leading to additional new 
 solutions. Equation (
24) power-law ansatz based 
 solutions are sufficient for the current paper’s aims and purposes. We may study several specific cases such as radiation fluids 
 to name an example [
33,
34]. We are also able to study the physical properties of possible singularities arising from each new previous 
 solution. Even if there are numerous new and more complex singularities in these previous 
 solutions, they may lead to some possible black hole solutions (point-like or not) and/or matter absorbing points. This task is beyond the aims of the paper and might be for potential future works.
  4. Dust Perfect Fluid Solutions ()
This specific case arises from 
 and 
 consideration. By setting 
 inside Equation (
17), the conservation law becomes the following:
We require that 
 constant. Then, Equation (
14a) remains unchanged, but Equations (
19a) and (
19b) will be simplified:
      
By combining Equations (
103a) and (
103b) and substituting Equations (
A1a) and (
A1b) FE components, we will obtain a simplified relation for 
 as follows:
Equation (
14a) becomes the following:
Equation (
21) for the torsion scalar becomes the following:
As for previous cases, we will apply the  coordinate set. The  constant coordinate leads to constant torsion scalar and GR solutions, which is not relevant for the current purpose.
For the 
 coordinate system, Equations (
104)–(
106) become the following:
      
By substituting Equation (
107b) into Equation (
107a), we find the following:
The best way for solving Equations (
107b)–(
108) is by a power-law solution ansatz as 
. Note also that, by setting 
 for static Robertson–Walker spacetimes, we obtain that 
 will be linear and this is a GR solution. Equations (
107b)–(
108) become the following:
      
      where 
. The case 
 is the simple static cosmological spacetime and this case may be considered as a special case. By substituting Equations (
109a) and (
109c) into Equation (
109b), we obtain the simplified DE to solve for 
 in a cosmological dust fluid where 
:
By using Equation (
103a) and then substituting Equations (
110) and (
A3), we find the fluid density:
      where 
 is given by Equation (
110) solutions. We will solve Equation (
110) for some values of 
b. For pure 
 solutions, we need to find from Equation (
109c) the characteristic equation and then solve for 
:
There are some specific values of b leading to an analytic  function and then to an  solution:
: For this simple case of cosmological spacetime, Equation (
112) becomes the following:
          
Equations (
107a)–(
107c) for 
 will be summarized by Equation (
110):
          
We solve Equation (
114) and obtain as a solution for a flat dust fluid:
          
          where 
 for a teleparallel solution (i.e., 
 leads to GR solutions). Once again, we obtain a pure power-law solution as in ref. [
18] for general 
 similarity (here 
 without any other constraint). By using Equation (
111), setting 
 and substituting Equation (
115), the fluid density 
 is as follows:
          
Equation (
116) is again a power-law function of 
T as usual. If 
, we find that 
 for 
.
: Equation (
112) becomes the following:
          
          where 
. Then, Equation (
110) becomes the following:
          
The solution of Equation (
118) is as follows:
          
          where 
. The fluid density 
 will be the following from Equation (
111):
          
: Equation (
112) becomes the following:
          
Equations (
110) becomes a simple DE:
          
The solution of Equation (
122) is as follows:
          
          where 
 and 
 is an integration constant. The fluid density 
 will be the following from Equation (
111):
          
: Equation (
112) becomes the following:
          
          where 
 and 
. Equation (
110) will be a DE and the solution is as follows:
          
          where 
 is an integration constant. The fluid density 
 will be the following from Equation (
111):
          
: We can in principle find analytic 
 solutions to the Equation (
112) characteristic equation. However, these 
 cannot lead to solvable and well-defined 
 solutions and this explains the limited number of possible power-law ansatz analytical 
 solutions for dust fluids.
All these teleparallel 
 solutions found in this section are all new. We may also use several other possible ansatz for finding further new 
 solutions as for 
Section 3. However, we only used in this section power-law ansatz as defined by Equation (
24) with 
 (because of Equation (
102)) and solved for several new and interesting 
 solutions all useful for many types of astrophysical or cosmological dust fluids. We may still study and look in detail for singularities and their related physical characteristics in potential future works as for 
Section 3 solutions. We can also find some point-like singularity solutions and/or matter absorbing singularities in these new 
 solutions.
  6. Discussion and Conclusions
In this paper, we first solved conservation laws and FEs and then found in 
Section 3, 
Section 4 and 
Section 5 dozens of new teleparallel 
 solutions in static spherically symmetric spacetimes for perfect fluids. These new 
 solutions are products of exponential, power, quotients and some mixtures of these types of expression. In some of these new 
 solutions, we found some new singularities which arise to point-like discontinuity or undefined 
 functions. In 
Section 3.1, we found new teleparallel 
 solutions for the constant 
 where we used a power-law ansatz in 
Section 3.1.1 and a special ansatz defined by an 
 constant (i.e., 
 set as in ref. [
18]) and an exponential 
 component in 
Section 3.1.2. This 
 component generalizes the power-law ansatz by a summation of an infinite number of integer power-law terms. By this approach, we found the same singularities as in 
Section 3.1.1 and an additional singularity arising from the new ansatz.
For the rest of the paper (
Section 3.2–
Section 5.2), we used a power-law ansatz approach to find new 
 solutions by choosing an 
 coordinate system. If 
 constant, then we found for slightly quadratic perfect fluid approximation (
 and 
) some new approximated 
 solutions as shown by Equations (
140) and (
141) in 
Section 5.1. The solutions found in 
Section 5.2 for non-linear perfect fluids (in particular 
) are usually generalizing the power-law 
 found in 
Section 3.2.2–
Section 3.2.5 for 
 and are exact. We can easily make the same assumptions for 
 cases for generalizing 
Section 3.2 new solutions. In addition, the new 
 solutions in 
Section 4 for cosmological dust fluids (
) should be useful for studying some cosmological models with baryonic matter [
34].
Then, we look for non-perfect fluid 
 solutions, but we will have at least to add supplementary terms to the Equation (
11) definition of energy momentum. We will at least have to add some factors such as viscosity and any fluid imperfections. Equation (
11) characterizes an ideal fluid without any viscosity or imperfection where the pressure and the density are directly linked by an EoS. But this assumption of Equation (
11) cannot necessarily be performed for non-perfect fluids because of these additional physical factors. Several works may be carried out in the future, but we can expect more complex 
 solutions than those found in this paper.
For astrophysical and cosmological applications, a detailed analysis for each 
 solution obtained will be necessary for determining the stability conditions and their physical processes. There are several recent works on this type of study (see [
34,
36,
37,
38,
39,
40,
41,
42,
43] and references within). They sometimes replace the fluid by a scalar field source in some of these studies [
37,
39]. In addition, we should also study the physical processes around the singularities for each 
 solution in some future works. We can also work with electromagnetic energy-momentum sources for new classes of 
 solutions and for possible “electromagnetic” BH horizons, but new 
 solutions will be necessary [
21,
24,
25,
26,
27]. The teleparallel 
 solutions obtained in this paper can also be used as conditions for dynamical cosmological models. These solutions can be used for 
-coordinates-based 
 solutions in some astrophysical and cosmological problems. In addition, there are in this paper many teleparallel 
 solutions for solving these physical problems and there are necessary ingredients for a complete cosmological analysis.
To proceed further in this approach, there are some ongoing developments concerning Kantowski–Sachs spacetime solutions in teleparallel 
 gravity where we look for general, fluid and other solutions (see [
18] and references within). There are some possible works on axially symmetric teleparallel 
 geometries allowing solving more astrophysical problems with teleparallel gravity [
44,
45]. Another possible work is looking for teleparallel 
-type geometries. All these possibilities deserve serious and tactful considerations.