Next Article in Journal
Hypercomplex Systems and Non-Gaussian Stochastic Solutions with Some Numerical Simulation of χ-Wick-Type (2 + 1)-D C-KdV Equations
Previous Article in Journal
A Unified Asymptotic Theory of Supersonic, Transonic, and Hypersonic Far Fields
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exploring the Limits of Euler–Bernoulli Theory in Micromechanics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Computation of the Deuteron Mass and Force Unification via the Rotating Lepton Model

by
Constantinos G. Vayenas
1,2,*,
Dimitrios Grigoriou
2,
Dionysios Tsousis
2,
Konstantinos Parisis
3 and
Elias C. Aifantis
3,4,5,*
1
Academy of Athens, Panepistimiou 28 Ave., GR-10679 Athens, Greece
2
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Patras, Caratheodory 1 St, GR-26504 Patras, Greece
3
School of Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GR-54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
4
College of Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA
5
Mechanical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, 90762 Fürth, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Axioms 2022, 11(11), 657; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11110657
Submission received: 12 October 2022 / Revised: 3 November 2022 / Accepted: 14 November 2022 / Published: 20 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applied Mathematics and Mechanics)

Abstract

:
The rotating lepton model (RLM), which is a 2D Bohr-type model of three gravitating rotating neutrinos, combining Newton’s gravitational law, special relativity, and the de Broglie equation of quantum mechanics, and which has already been used to model successfully quarks and the strong force in several hadrons, has been extended to 3D and to six rotating neutrinos located at the vertices of a normal triangular octahedron in order to compute the Lorentz factors, gamma, of the six neutrinos and, thus, to compute the total energy and mass of the deuteron, which is the lightest nucleus. The computation includes no adjustable parameters, and the computed deuteron mass agrees within 0.05% with the experimental mass value. This very good agreement suggests that, similarly to the strong force in hadrons, the nuclear force in nuclei can also be modeled as relativistic gravity. This implies that, via the combination of special relativity and quantum mechanics, the Newtonian gravity gets unified with the strong force, including the residual strong force.

1. Introduction

The strong force or strong interaction binds together the constituents of protons, neutrons, and other hadrons, such as quarks and gluons. It is also the force holding together protons and neutrons to form nuclei. In this case, the strong force is known as nuclear force or the residual strong force. The strong force is thought to be mediated by gluons acting upon quarks, antiquarks and gluons themselves as elaborated upon in the theory of quantum chromodynamics (QCD) [1]. Using special relativity [2,3], in conjunction with the de Broglie equation of quantum mechanics, recent work has shown that quarks have highly relativistic rotational velocities, and that their rest mass is that of neutrinos [4,5,6]. These particles rotate with speeds close to the speed of light; thus, their inertial and gravitational masses become enormous [7], reaching the range of the Planck mass. This suggests that the strong force or strong interaction can be viewed as gravitational attraction between ultrarelativistic quarks or neutrinos [4,5,6,8,9,10]. This is the basis of the rotating lepton model (RLM), which is a two-dimensional (2D) Bohr-type model with gravity as the attractive force [4,5,11], based entirely on three basic equations of Newton, Einstein, and de Broglie, thus combining special relativity and quantum mechanics and leading to semiquantitative (±1%) agreement with the measured hadron and boson masses [11]. Here, the RLM is extended to 3D and is used for the first time to compute the mass of a nucleus, i.e., of the deuteron. The computed mass agrees within 0.05% with the experimental deuteron mass without any adjustable parameters. This very good agreement shows that, similarly to the strong force [11,12], the nuclear force can also be modeled as relativistic gravity.
Gravitational forces between neutrinos or within neutrino–electron pairs are commonly expected to be very weak. This is because the rest masses of neutrinos are very small (Figure 1). However, special relativity [2,3] in conjunction with the equivalence principle [7] dictates that the gravitational masses of neutrinos [4,5] and, thus, the gravitational forces between neutrinos and electrons tend to infinity as their speeds approach the speed of light [4,5,13]. Accordingly, due to their very small rest masses, neutrinos can be easily accelerated to ultrarelativistic speeds and be caught in circular rotational states with speeds very close to the speed of light [4,5]. It has, thus, been shown that these ultrarelativistic rotating neutrinos have the properties of quarks [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11], i.e., their relativistic mass is equal to the rest mass of quarks. This has led to the development of the rotating lepton model (RLM), which allows for the computation of the masses of hadrons and bosons [4,5,6,7,8,9,10] with an astonishing precision of 1% without any adjustable parameters.

2. The Rotating Lepton Model (RLM)

An example for the formation of a neutron from three ultrarelativistic gravitationally confined rotating neutrinos acting as quarks is shown in Figure 2. The equation of motion for each rotating neutrino is obtained by combining the special relativistic equation for circular motion for each rotating neutrino,
F G = γ m o v 2 / r ,
where mo is the neutrino rest mass, and γ is the Lorentz factor (1 − v2/c2)−1/2, with Newton’s gravitational law using the gravitational masses of the neutrinos. According to special relativity [2,3,4], γmo is equal to the relativistic mass of a particle of rest mass mo, while γ3mo is equal to its inertial mass [2,3,4]. According to the equivalence principle, the latter is equal to the gravitational mass, mg, i.e.,
m g = γ 3 m o .
It is worth noting that the gravitational mass, mg, is defined from Newton’s gravitational law, i.e., from
m g 2 = 3 F G r 2 / G ,
thus satisfying by definition Equation (4).
F G = ( G m g 2 ) / ( 3 r 2 ) .
Thus, upon combining with Equations (1) and (2), one obtains
γ m o v 2 r = G m g 2 3 r 2 = G m o 2 γ 6 3 r 2 .
Thus, Equation (5) becomes
r = ( G m o 3 c 2 ) γ 5 [ γ 2 / ( γ 2 1 ) ] .
This equation is plotted in Figure 2 for m o = 0.0437 eV/c2 [4,5,6,7,8,9,10], i.e., a value within the range of the heaviest neutrino mass, 0.048 ± 0.01 eV/c2 [4,14,15], and exhibits bistability, i.e., there are two γ values satisfying Equation (6) for any r value above ( 2.96 ) G m o / c 2 ( = 1.71 × 10 64   m ) [4]. The high γ branch corresponds to highly relativistic speeds; as shown in Figure 2, the model solution is found by the intersection of Equation (6) with the de Broglie equation
r = / γ m o v = / m v ,
which reduces for γ > 102 to
r = / γ m o c = / m c ,
where m ( = γ m o ) is the relativistic neutrino mass. The intersection of Equations (6) and (8) defines the following γ and neutron mass, m n , values:
γ = 7.163 × 10 9 ;   m n = 3 γ m o = 939.565   MeV / c 2 ,
as shown in Figure 2. The computed neutron mass, m n , is in quantitative agreement with the literature value [1]. Furthermore, the r value at the intersection of Figure 2 is also computed from the de Broglie or Compton equation:
r = 3 m n c = 0.630   fm ,
which is in quantitative agreement with the value of the proton radius measured recently by Burkert and coworkers [16], via deep inelastic Compton scattering, i.e., 0.63 fm.
Equations (6) and (8) also yield the following expressions, relating m n and m o :
m n = 3 13 / 12 ( m Pl m o 2 ) 1 / 3 ;   m o = ( m n / 3 ) 3 / 2 / ( 3 1 / 8 m Pl 1 / 2 ) ,
i.e., m n = 939.565 MeV/c2 [13] and m o = 0.0437250 eV/c2 [4,11,12], where the mo value lies again within the range of the heaviest neutrino mass, (0.048 ± 0.01 eV/c2) [4,11,12], and where m Pl ( = c / G ) 1 / 2 = 1.220890 × 10 28   eV / c 2 .
These studies [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,13] show strongly that the strong force can be modeled successfully as relativistic gravity between relativistic neutrinos or, equivalently, between quarks, and that the weak force can be modeled successfully as relativistic gravity between neutrinos and electrons/positrons [6,8,11,13].
Here, we show that gravity, special relativity, and the RLM suffice to describe not only the strong force, i.e., the intrahadron forces between quarks, but also the residual strong forces, i.e., the interhadron forces, commonly termed nuclear forces, between hadrons in nuclei [1,4]. We are, thus, able to model the structure, as well as compute the mass and interaction energy of the deuteron, formed from a proton and a neutron, within 0.05%.

3. The Deuteron Model

The deuteron, i.e., the nucleus of the deuterium, consists of a proton and a neutron and has a mass of 1875.613 MeV/c2, which is 2.225 MeV/c2 smaller than the sum of the proton (938.272 MeV/c2) and neutron (939.565 MeV/c2) masses, respectively. The difference is commonly called the interaction energy.
According to the rotating lepton model (RLM), the neutron, as well as the proton, consists of three neutrinos of the heaviest rest mass, mo, eigenstate, i.e., of mass 3 in the normal hierarchy [4,5,14,15] (Figure 1). These neutrinos in their gravitationally confined relativistic state have γ values as high as 1010; hence, their relativistic mass is of the order of 0.3 GeV/c2, i.e., in the range of quarks, thus acting as u and/or d quarks. Therefore, it follows that the deuteron can be modeled as a composite particle comprising six neutrinos, three from its proton and three from its neutron initial constituents.
The proposed 3D geometry of the deuteron structure is shown in Figure 3. It can be viewed as a neutron placed on top of a proton rotated by 60°, which coincides with the structure of a normal triangular octahedron, a solid body with six vertices, which is one of the five Platonic solids. At the center of this octahedron resides a stagnant positron, originating from the proton [4,5], which combines with a neutron to form the deuteron. The six neutrinos are located at the vertices of the octahedron, and, as shown in Figure 3, they can rotate around seven symmetrically oriented rotational axes.

4. Mathematical Modeling and Mass Computation

The deuteron geometry and its mathematical modeling are shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4. The equation of motion of a neutrino in the “equatorial” rotation (Figure 3b and Figure 4a–c) is given in Equation (12).
F 1 = γ 1 m o v 1 2 / r 1 = [ G m o 2 γ 1 6 / r 2 ] ( 3 1 / 2 + 3 3 / 2 + 2 × 6 3 / 2 ) ,
which, together with the de Broglie quantization condition for a composite particle of nuclear spin 1, i.e.,
r = r 1 = 2 γ 1 m o v 1 ,
and with the definition of the Planck mass ( m Pl = ( c / G ) 1 / 2 ) , gives for v 1 c the expression
γ 1 = 2 1 / 6 ( 3 1 / 2 + 3 3 / 2 + 2 × 6 3 / 2 ) 1 / 6 m Pl 1 / 3 m o 1 / 3 ,
Similarly, the equation of motion of a neutrino in the top–bottom rotation (Figure 3c and Figure 4d,e) is
F 2 = γ 2 m o v 2 2 / r 2 = [ G m o 2 γ 2 6 / r 2 ] ( 2 2 3 + 1 6 ) ,
which, together with the de Broglie quantization condition,
r 2 = ( 6 / 2 ) r = 2 γ 2 m o v 2 ,
gives
γ 2 = 2 1 / 6 ( 2 1 / 2 + 1 / 4 ) 1 / 6 m Pl 1 / 3 m o 1 / 3 .
Thus, upon noting that there are four equatorial rotational axes and three top–bottom rotational axes (Figure 3a,b and Figure 4), and accounting for energy equipartition, it follows that the mean rotational γ value is given by
γ ¯ = ( 4 / 7 ) γ 1 + ( 3 / 7 ) γ 2 .
Consequently, accounting for energy conservation, the rotating deuteron mass, m d , r , is computed from the composite particle relation:
m d , r = 6 γ ¯ m o ,
or, using Equations (14) and (17)–(19), from
m d , r = 2 1 / 6 [ ( 4 / 7 ) [ 3 1 / 2 + 3 3 / 2 + 2 × 6 3 / 2 ] 1 / 6 + ( 3 / 7 ) [ 2 1 / 2 + 1 / 4 ] 1 / 6 ] ( m Pl m o 2 ) 1 / 3
To this value must be added the mass of the positron, i.e., 0.511 MeV/c2 [1,11], located at the center of the structure, to obtain
m d = m d , r + m e = m d , r + 0.511   MeV / c 2 .
Using the mo value of 0.0437250 eV/c2 found to yield exactly the neutron mass via Equation (9), Equations (19) and (20) give md = 1876.368 MeV/c2. Exact agreement with the experimental value of md = 1875.613 MeV is obtained for the value m o , d = 0.0436986   eV / c 2 . This value differs by less than 0.06% from the mo value, denoted m o , n = 0.0437250   eV / c 2 , which gives exact agreement with the neutron mass mn (Equation (9)). Furthermore, if we use m o , n or m o , d to compute both the neutron and the deuteron masses from Equations (9), (19), and (20), the computed values differ by less than 0.05%.
It is worth noting that the rotational radii computed from Equations (13) and (16) are 1.2102 fm and 1.4821 fm, respectively. Using the larger of the two (1.482 fm) and adding to it the average Compton wavelength, / γ ¯ m o c , of the neutrino, i.e., 0.6312 fm, in order to obtain the outer radius of the deuteron, one finds r d = 2.1133   fm , which differs by less than 2% from the experimental value of 2.1413 fm.

5. Conclusions and Future Work

The astonishing agreement between the computed md value (1876.37 MeV/c2) and the experimental value (1875.612 MeV/c2), without use of any adjustable parameters, shows that, similarly to the strong force [4,5,10], the residual strong force or nuclear force can also be modeled quantitatively as relativistic gravity. This force is computed via Equation (5), which accounts for the special relativistic equation for gravitational mass m g ( = γ 3 m o ) [2,3] in conjunction with Newton’s universal gravitational law.
It appears reasonable to expect that the present RLM approach can be useful for computing interaction energies in larger and more complex nuclei as well, in which case the use of approximate [17,18] internuclear, e.g., Yukawa type, potentials might no longer be necessary, and can be replaced by gradient-enhanced potentials (e.g., gradient modification of Newton’s classical gravitational potential). We plan to address this point in future work.
More importantly, the present results imply that both the strong force and the nuclear force can be modeled and computed accurately via the combination of Newtonian gravity and Einstein’s special relativity. The high level of agreement between the experimental values and the RLM predictions, both in the case of the strong force in hadrons [4,5,11] and bosons [6,8,11], and in the present modeling description of the nuclear force in the deuteron nucleus, is apparently due to the fact that the RLM combines in a direct way relativity with quantum mechanics via the Einstein and de Broglie equations (Equations (6) and (7), respectively). This combination of relativity and quantum mechanics has been a long-sought goal, expected to lead to a powerful unifying gravitational theory [19,20,21]. The present results show that this is indeed the case, by demonstrating the unification of gravity with the strong force, including the residual strong force or nuclear force. This, in conjunction with the recently described combination of the weak nuclear force with relativistic gravity [6,11], leaves only two forces, i.e., gravity and electromagnetism.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.G.V., E.C.A., D.G., D.T. and K.P.; Methodology, C.G.V., E.C.A., D.G., D.T. and K.P.; Formal analysis, C.G.V., E.C.A., D.G., D.T. and K.P.; Writing-original draft preparation, C.G.V.; Writing-review and editing, C.G.V., E.C.A., D.G., D.T. and K.P.; Supervision, C.G.V. and E.C.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We thank our reviewers for their very thorough and constructive reviews.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Glossary/Nomenclature/Abbreviations

QCDQuantum chromodynamics
RLMRotating lepton model
m1, m2, m3Rest neutrino eigenmasses
mnNeutron mass
meElectron mass
mμMuon mass
mPl ( c / G ) 1 / 2 = 1.221 × 10 28   eV / c 2 , Planck mass
γLorentz factor = ( 1 v 2 / c 2 ) 1 / 2
moRest mass
vParticle speed
rRotational radius
GGravitational constant, 6.6743 × 10−11 m3/(kgs2)
mgGravitational mass
miInertial mass
cSpeed of light in vacuum
Reduced Planck’s constant
eV/c2Mass unit, 1.783 × 10−36 kg
γ ¯ Mean γ value
F1Centripetal force in the equatorial rotation
F2Centripetal force in the top–bottom rotation
mdTotal deuteron mass
md,rMass of the rotating components of the deuteron
mo,dNeutrino rest mass in the deuteron
mo,nNeutrino rest mass in the neutron
1Equatorial rotation
2Top–bottom rotation
dDeuteron
Quantum chromodynamics (QCD)The strong force theory of the standard model (SM).
Rotating lepton model (RLM)It has the same goals as QCD, but has no adjustable parameters.
DeuteronThe nucleus of the deuterium, comprising a proton and a neutron.
QuarksBuilding blocks of hadrons, identified as relativistic rotating neutrinos in the RLM.
Strong forceForce binding the constituents of hadrons.
Relativistic gravityNewtonian gravity, also accounting for special relativity.
Residual strong forceThe force binding nucleons with other nucleons.

References

  1. Griffiths, D. Introduction to Elementary Particles, 2nd ed.; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  2. Einstein, A. Zür Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper. Ann. Der Physik. 1905, 4, 891–921, English Translation On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies by Jeffery, G.B. and Perrett, W. 1923. Available online: http://fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www (accessed on 22 September 2022). [CrossRef]
  3. French, A.P. Special Relativity; W.W. Norton & Co.: New York, NY, USA, 1968. [Google Scholar]
  4. Vayenas, C.G.; Souentie, S. A Bohr-Einstein-de Broglie Model for the Formation of Hadrons. In Gravity, Special Relativity and the Strong Force; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  5. Vayenas, C.G.; Souentie, S.; Fokas, A. A Bohr-type model of a composite particle using gravity as the attractive force. Physica A 2014, 405, 360–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Vayenas, C.G.; Fokas, A.S.; Grigoriou, D. On the structure, masses and thermos-dynamics of the W± bosons. Physica A 2016, 450, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Roll, P.G.; Krotkov, R.; Dicke, R.G. The equivalence of inertial and passive gravitational mass. Ann. Phys. 1964, 26, 442–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fokas, A.S.; Vayenas, C.G.; Grigoriou, D.P. On the mass and thermodynamics of the Higgs boson. Physica A 2018, 492, 737–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vayenas, C.G.; Grigoriou, D.P. Hadronization via gravitational confinement. In Proceedings of the Particle Physics at the Year of 25th Anniversary of the Lomonosov Conferences, Moscow, Russia, 24–30 August 2017; Studenikin, A., Ed.; World Scientific: Singapore, 2019; pp. 517–524. [Google Scholar]
  10. Grigoriou, D.P.; Vayenas, C.G. Schwarzschild geodesics and the strong force. In Proceedings of the Particle Physics at the Year of 25th Anniversary of the Lomonosov Conferences, Moscow, Russia, 24–30 August 2017; Studenikin, A., Ed.; World Scientific: Singapore, 2019; pp. 374–377. [Google Scholar]
  11. Vayenas, C.G.; Tsousis, D.; Grigoriou, D. Computation of the masses, energies and internal pressures of hadrons, mesons and bosons via the Rotating Lepton Model. Physica A 2020, 545, 123679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Vayenas, C.G.; Tsousis, D.; Grigoriou, D.; Parisis, K.; Aifantis, E.C. Hadronization via gravitational confinement of fast neutrinos: Mechanics at fm distances. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 2022, 102, e202100158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Vayenas, C.G.; Grigoriou, D.; Tsousis, D. Mass generation via gravitational confinement of fast neutrinos. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2001.09760v5. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mohapatra, R.N.; Antusch, S.; Babu, K.S.; Barenboim, G.; Chen, M.-C.; De Gouvêa, A.; De Holanda, P.; Dutta, B.; Grossman, Y.; Joshipura, A.; et al. Theory of neutrinos: A white paper. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2007, 70, 1757–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kajita, T. Discovery of neutrino oscillations. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2006, 69, 1607–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Burkert, V.D.; Elouadrhiri, L.; Girod, F.X. The pressure distribution inside the proton. Nature 2018, 557, 396–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Aifantis, E.C. A concise review of gradient models in mechanics and physics. Front. Phys. 2020, 7, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Aifantis, E.C. Gradient Extension of Classical Material Models: From Nuclear & Condensed Matter Scales to Earth & Cosmological Scales. In Size-Dependent Continuum Mechanics Approaches; Springer: Cham, Germany, 2021; pp. 417–452. [Google Scholar]
  19. Weinberg, S. Dreams of a Final Theory; Pantheon Books: New York, NY, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  20. Penrose, R. The Road to Reality: A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe; Vintage: London, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hawking, S. A Brief History of Time; Transworld Publishers Ltd.: London, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Comparison of computed via the RLM (horizontal dotted lines) [12] and experimental [14,15] neutrino eigenmasses; mn and mμ are the neutron and muon masses, respectively. The m3, m2, and m1 expressions were retrieved from [12]. These equations imply that, interestingly, m3/m2 = m2/m1 ≈ 6.3 ≈ 2π.
Figure 1. Comparison of computed via the RLM (horizontal dotted lines) [12] and experimental [14,15] neutrino eigenmasses; mn and mμ are the neutron and muon masses, respectively. The m3, m2, and m1 expressions were retrieved from [12]. These equations imply that, interestingly, m3/m2 = m2/m1 ≈ 6.3 ≈ 2π.
Axioms 11 00657 g001
Figure 2. Plot of the relativistic equation for circular motion of three gravitating neutrinos each of rest mass mo (Equation (6)) and of the de Broglie equation for each of these particles (Equation (7)), which accounts for its dual wave–particle nature, showing that the intersection of these two curves defines the neutron mass (939.565 MeV/c2) and radius (0.630 fm) in quantitative agreement with experiment [16]. The heaviest neutrino mass value used (mo = 0.0437·eV/c2) is computed from the equation m o = m n 3 / 2 / 3 1 / 8 m Pl 1 / 2 derived from Equations (5) and (7), and it lies within the current experimental uncertainty limits of the heaviest neutrino mass measured at the Super-Kamiokande [14,15]. The neutron mass (939.565 MeV/c2) is a factor of γ (=7.163 × 109) larger than the rest mass of the three neutrinos (0.131 eV/c2) according to Equation (9).
Figure 2. Plot of the relativistic equation for circular motion of three gravitating neutrinos each of rest mass mo (Equation (6)) and of the de Broglie equation for each of these particles (Equation (7)), which accounts for its dual wave–particle nature, showing that the intersection of these two curves defines the neutron mass (939.565 MeV/c2) and radius (0.630 fm) in quantitative agreement with experiment [16]. The heaviest neutrino mass value used (mo = 0.0437·eV/c2) is computed from the equation m o = m n 3 / 2 / 3 1 / 8 m Pl 1 / 2 derived from Equations (5) and (7), and it lies within the current experimental uncertainty limits of the heaviest neutrino mass measured at the Super-Kamiokande [14,15]. The neutron mass (939.565 MeV/c2) is a factor of γ (=7.163 × 109) larger than the rest mass of the three neutrinos (0.131 eV/c2) according to Equation (9).
Axioms 11 00657 g002
Figure 3. Schematic of the RLM structure of the triangular octahedron model (a) for the deuteron, drawn using the de Broglie–Compton wavelength spheres of the rotating neutrinos (b,c) each of radius r = 0.631   f m = / γ ¯ m o c and showing the seven rotational axes, of which four are equatorial type (b) and three are top–bottom type (c).
Figure 3. Schematic of the RLM structure of the triangular octahedron model (a) for the deuteron, drawn using the de Broglie–Compton wavelength spheres of the rotating neutrinos (b,c) each of radius r = 0.631   f m = / γ ¯ m o c and showing the seven rotational axes, of which four are equatorial type (b) and three are top–bottom type (c).
Axioms 11 00657 g003
Figure 4. Centripetal force components (marked by red arrows) of the forces F1 and F2 for the equatorial (ac) and top–bottom (d,e) neutrino rotations, respectively. Equatorial forces: F 1 = 2 F a + 2 F b + F c ;   F a = ( 1 / 2 3 ) ( G m 2 / r 2 ) ;   F b = ( 1 / 6 3 ) ( G m 2 / r 2 ) ;   F c = ( 1 / 3 6 ) ( G m 2 / r 2 ) . Top–bottom forces: F 2 = 4 F d + F e ;   F d = ( 2 / 6 ) ( G m 2 / r 2 ) ;   F e = ( 1 / 6 ) ( G m 2 / r 2 ) .
Figure 4. Centripetal force components (marked by red arrows) of the forces F1 and F2 for the equatorial (ac) and top–bottom (d,e) neutrino rotations, respectively. Equatorial forces: F 1 = 2 F a + 2 F b + F c ;   F a = ( 1 / 2 3 ) ( G m 2 / r 2 ) ;   F b = ( 1 / 6 3 ) ( G m 2 / r 2 ) ;   F c = ( 1 / 3 6 ) ( G m 2 / r 2 ) . Top–bottom forces: F 2 = 4 F d + F e ;   F d = ( 2 / 6 ) ( G m 2 / r 2 ) ;   F e = ( 1 / 6 ) ( G m 2 / r 2 ) .
Axioms 11 00657 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vayenas, C.G.; Grigoriou, D.; Tsousis, D.; Parisis, K.; Aifantis, E.C. Computation of the Deuteron Mass and Force Unification via the Rotating Lepton Model. Axioms 2022, 11, 657. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11110657

AMA Style

Vayenas CG, Grigoriou D, Tsousis D, Parisis K, Aifantis EC. Computation of the Deuteron Mass and Force Unification via the Rotating Lepton Model. Axioms. 2022; 11(11):657. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11110657

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vayenas, Constantinos G., Dimitrios Grigoriou, Dionysios Tsousis, Konstantinos Parisis, and Elias C. Aifantis. 2022. "Computation of the Deuteron Mass and Force Unification via the Rotating Lepton Model" Axioms 11, no. 11: 657. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11110657

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop