Next Article in Journal
Is Football/Soccer Purely Stochastic, Made Out of Luck, or Maybe Predictable? How Does Bayesian Reasoning Assess Sports?
Next Article in Special Issue
New Integral Inequalities via Generalized Preinvex Functions
Previous Article in Journal
Model Predictive Control of COVID-19 Pandemic with Social Isolation and Vaccination Policies in Thailand
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nonlinear EHD Instability of Two-Superposed Walters’ B Fluids Moving through Porous Media
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

On the Finite Dimensionality of Closed Subspaces in Lp(M, ) ∩ Lq(M, )

by
Alexander A. Balinsky
1,† and
Anatolij K. Prykarpatski
2,*,†
1
Mathematics Institute, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF24 4AG, UK
2
Department of Computer Science and Telecommunication, Cracov University of Technology, 31-155 Krakow, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Axioms 2021, 10(4), 275; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms10040275
Submission received: 17 September 2021 / Revised: 11 October 2021 / Accepted: 12 October 2021 / Published: 25 October 2021

Abstract

:
Finding effective finite-dimensional criteria for closed subspaces in L p , endowed with some additional functional constraints, is a well-known and interesting problem. In this work, we are interested in some sufficient constraints on closed functional subspaces, S p L p , whose finite dimensionality is not fixed a priori and can not be checked directly. This is often the case in diverse applications, when a closed subspace S p L p is constructed by means of some additional conditions and constraints on L p with no direct exemplification of the functional structure of its elements. We consider a closed topological subspace, S p ( q ) , of the functional Banach space, L p ( M , d μ ) , and, moreover, one assumes that additionally, S p ( q ) L q ( M , d ν ) is subject to a probability measure ν on M . Then, we show that closed subspaces of L p ( M , d μ ) L q ( M , d ν ) for q > max { 1 , p } , p > 0 are finite dimensional. The finite dimensionality result concerning the case when q > p > 0 is open and needs more sophisticated techniques, mainly based on analysis of the complementary subspaces to L p ( M , d μ ) L q ( M , d ν ) .

1. Introduction

The problems, concerned with the finite dimensionality of closed functional subspaces in L p (in part, in L p ( 0 , 1 ; C ) ), are of long-time interest in analysis, being related to their many applications in operator and approximation theories [1,2,3,4,5], in dynamical systems theory [6,7,8,9,10,11] and other applied fields. As an example, one can recall a central problem in Banach space theory to classify the complemented subspaces of L p up to isomorphism; the finite-dimensional analogue is to find for any given S p L p a description of the finite-dimensional spaces which are S p -isomorphic to S p -complemented subspaces of L p . These problems were thoroughly studied before [12], in particular finite-dimensional versions of this complemented subspaces of the L p problem, yet in both cases their classification is far from over.
It was observed that sometimes, the finite-dimensional version of an infinite- dimensional problem leads to a theory which is much more interesting than the infinite-dimensional theory. Here, one can recall the problem of describing the subspaces of L p which embed isomorphically into a “smaller” L p space; namely, the space l p , for which there is a fairly good answer [12]. One can recall that density on a probability space, M, is a strictly positive measurable function h : M R + for which h d μ = 1 . Such a density h induces for fixed 0 < p < an isometry J h ( p ) from L p ( M , d μ ) onto L p ( M , h d μ ) . The next result, due to D. Lewis [13,14], gives useful information about chosen a priori finite-dimensional subspaces S p L p .
Theorem 1.
Let μ be a probability measure on M, and let S p be a N-dimensional subspace of L p ( M , d μ ) , 0 < p < , with full support. Then, there is a density h > 0 so that the image J h ( p ) S p has a basis { φ 1 , φ 2 , , φ N } L 2 ( M , h d μ ) , which is orthonormal in L 2 ( M , h d μ ) and such that j = 1 , N ¯ | φ j | 2 = N .
Assuming that S p is already a subspace of L p for some finite dim S p N , one can randomly pick a few coordinates and hope that the natural projection onto these coordinates restricted to S p is a good isomorphism. If we do this with no additional preparation, this will not work. Indeed, the subspace S p may contain a vector with small support, say one of the unit vector basis elements of l N , in which case, the chance that a coordinate in its support is picked is small. Of course, if no such coordinate is picked, the said projection cannot be an isomorphism on S p . The point is that one wants to change S p first to another isometric copy of S p , in which each element of S p is spread out. This can be performed by a change of density. This method was used with other tools to produce the best known results.

2. Finite Dimensionality of Closed Subspaces in L p L q

As the imbedding structure of a priori taken finite-dimensional subspaces in L p is in many cases very important and instructive, nonetheless finding the effective criteria for closed subspaces in L p endowed with some additional functional constraints to be finite dimensional remains very important and hard both from theoretical and applied points of view. Below, we are interested in some sufficient constraints on functional closed subspaces S p L p , whose finite dimensionality is not fixed a priori and cannot be checked directly. This is often the case in diverse applications, when a closed subspace S p L p is constructed by means of some additional conditions and constraints on L p with no direct presentation of the functional structure of its elements. In particular, we consider a topological subspace, S p ( q ) , of the functional Banach space, L p ( M , d μ ) , where μ is a probability measure on measurable space M . Moreover, one assumes that additionally, S p ( q ) L q ( M , d ν ) is subject to a probability measure ν on M . Then, we prove the following theorem first announced in [15].
Theorem 2.
Let a closed topological subspace S p ( q ) L p ( M , d μ ) belong to L q ( M , d ν ) , q > max { 1 , p } , p > 0 , where measures μ , ν are probabilistic and the measure μ is absolutely continuous with respect to the measure ν on M . Then the subspace S p ( q ) is finite dimensional, that is dim S p ( q ) < .
Let us consider a closed topological subspace, S p ( q ) , of the functional Banach space, L p ( M , d μ ) , where μ is a probability measure absolutely continuous with respect to the measure ν on M , and satisfies, in addition, the constraint S p ( q ) L q ( M , d ν ) subject to a probability measure ν on M . In order to state Theorem 2, formulated above, we need some lemmas.
Lemma 1.
For any q > p > 0 , there exists a bounded positive constant K p , q , such that
f q , ν K p , q f 1 , ν
for any f S p ( q ) L p ( M , d μ ) L q ( M , d ν ) .
Proof. 
As the topological space S p ( q ) L p ( M , d μ ) L q ( M , d ν ) is closed in L p ( M , d μ ) , one can define the identical imbedding
J : S p ( q ) L p ( M , d μ ) L q ( M , d ν )
If a sequence { f n : n Z + } S p ( q ) converges in S p ( q ) to an element f S p ( q ) with respect to the norm on L p ( M , d μ ) and simultaneously it converges to an element g L q ( M , d ν ) with respect to the norm on L p ( M , d μ ) , owing to the absolute continuity of the measure μ with respect to ν , one can identify these limits f g almost everywhere. Then, we enter into conditions of the Banach closed graph theorem [16,17,18] and can infer that there exists such a positive constant K < that
f q , ν = J f q , ν K f p , μ
for any f S p ( q ) L q ( M , d ν ) , where as usual, we denote f p , μ : = M | f | p d μ 1 / p , f q , ν : = M | f | q d ν 1 / q . It is easy to check, using the classical Young inequality, that for 1 p > 0
f p , μ = f · 1 p , μ f 1 , μ 1 ( 1 p ) , μ h , ν 2 f 1 , ν f 1 , ν ,
giving rise to (1), where we take into account [19,20] that the Radon–Nikodym derivative d μ / d ν = h L 1 ( M , d ν ) L ( M , d ν ) and h , ν 1 . If p > 1 , based on the inequality (3), one can also easily obtain that
f q , ν K p , q f 1 , ν
for any f S p ( q ) L p ( M , d μ ) L q ( M , d ν ) , if q > p > 1 . Indeed, consider the next norm transformations, once more based on the Young inequality:
| | f | | p , μ p = M | f | q ( p 1 ) ( q 1 ) · | f | ( q p ) ( q 1 ) d μ | | h | | , ν M | f | q d ν p 1 q 1 M | f | d ν q p q 1 | | f | | q , ν q ( p 1 ) ( q 1 ) · | | f | | 1 , ν q p q 1 .
Now, making use of the inequality (3), it ensues from (6) that
f p , μ p K q ( p 1 ) ( q 1 ) f q , μ q ( p 1 ) ( q 1 ) · f 1 , ν q p q 1 ,
which reduces, using (3) once more, in the inequality
f q , ν K p ( q 1 ) ( q p ) f 1 , ν : = K p , q f 1 , ν
for all f S p ( q ) L q ( M , d ν ) L p ( M , d μ ) , proving the lemma. □
As a usuful consequence from Lemma 1 and the obvious norm property f 1 f q for any f L 1 ( M , d ν ) , we can deduce that S p ( q ) L 1 ( M , d ν ) L q ( M , d ν ) , which makes it possible to single out from the subspace S p ( q ) L q ( M , d ν ) linear-independent functions φ j S p ( q ) L 1 ( M , d ν ) , j = 1 , N ¯ , for some N N and construct the closed N-diemensional subspace:
S p , N ( q ) : = span C { φ j S p ( q ) L 1 ( M , d ν ) : | | φ j 1 , ν = 1 , j = 1 , N ¯ } .
For fixed N N , the subspace S p , N ( q ) S p ( q ) L 1 ( M , d ν ) , q > max { 1 , p } , p > 0 , characterizes the next lemma.
Lemma 2.
Given the N-dimensional subspace S p , N ( q ) S p ( q ) L 1 ( M , d ν ) L q ( M , d ν ) , defined by (9), q > max { 1 , p } , p > 0 . Then, there exists an N-dimensional subspace S ˜ p , N ( q ) , * L ( M , d ν ) such that
S ˜ p , N ( q ) , * : = span C { ψ j S p , N ( q ) , * L ( M , d ν ) : j = 1 , N ¯ } ,
dim S p , N ( q ) , * = N , and whose basis functions satisfy the biorthogonality condition
M ψ k φ j d ν = δ j k : j , k = 1 , N ¯
for all j , k = 1 , N ¯ . Moreover, owing to the canonical isomorphisms L q ( M , d ν ) L q ˜ ( M , d ν ) , 1 / q ˜ + 1 / q = 1 , and L 1 ( M , d ν ) L ( M , d ν ) , the corresponding subspace S p ( q ) , * L ( M , d ν ) L q ˜ ( M , d ν ) is also closed and S p , N ( q ) , * S p ( q ) , * .
Remark 1.
It is interesting to note here [1] that the spaces L ( M , d ν ) L q ˜ ( M , d ν ) and L ( M , d ν ) L q ˜ ( M , d ν ) are not isomorphic.
Proof. 
Owing to Lemma 1, one can define linear bounded functionals F k : S p , N ( q ) L 1 ( M , d ν ) C , k = 1 , N ¯ , for which
F k ( φ j ) = δ j k
for all j , k = 1 , N ¯ . They are well defined, as the basis function φ j S p , N ( q ) L 1 ( M , d ν ) , j = 1 , N ¯ is linearly independent. Now, making use of the classical Hahn–Banach theorem [16,18], these functionals can be extended as bounded linear functionals on the whole space L 1 ( M , d ν ) , to which one can apply the Riesz representation theorem:
F k ( φ ) : = M φ ψ k d ν
for all φ L 1 ( M , d ν ) , where ψ k L ( M , d ν ) , F k = ψ k < , k = 1 , N ¯ , are the corresponding functional elements, generating the subspace S p , N ( q ) , * L 1 ( M , d ν ) * L ( M , d ν ) and satisfying the condition (11). As q > max { 1 , p } , p > 0 , and the closed subspace S p , N ( q ) S p ( q ) L q ( M , d ν ) L 1 ( M , d ν ) , owing to the canonical isomorphisms L q ( M , d ν ) L q ˜ ( M , d ν ) , 1 / q ˜ + 1 / q = 1 , and L 1 ( M , d ν ) L ( M , d ν ) one easily finds that the subspace S p ( q ) , * L ( M , d ν ) L q ˜ ( M , d ν ) is also closed and S p , N ( q ) , * S p ( q ) , * , thus proving the lemma. □
Proof of Theorem 2.
As follows from Lemma 2, the closed subspace S p ( q ) , * L ( M , d ν ) L q ˜ ( M , d ν ) a priori contains the finite-dimensional subspace S p , N ( q ) , * L ( M , d ν ) L q ˜ ( M , d ν ) , dim S p , N ( q ) , * = N . The latter makes it possible to reduce the finite dimensionality problem subject to the closed subspace S p ( q ) L 1 ( M , d ν ) L q ( M , d ν ) to the one of the closed subspace S p ( q ) , * L ( M , d ν ) L q ˜ ( M , d ν ) , following the Grothendieck [21] scheme. First, we observe that the embedding mapping S p ( q ) , * L q ˜ ( M , d ν ) S p ( q ) , * L ( M , d ν ) is a closed operator, giving rise owing to the Banach closed operator theorem to the inequality
g R g q ˜
for any g S p ( q ) , * L ( M , d ν ) and some positive and bounded number R < . Moreover, making use of the Young inequality, for any > q ˜ > 0 one can find such a positive constant R q ˜ < that
g R q ˜ g 2
for any g S p ( q ) , * L ( M , d ν ) . Taking into account that, according to (14), any g S p ( q ) , * L 2 ( M , d ν ) L ( M , d ν ) , one can choose the finite dimensional subspace (10) such that the set of functions ψ : = { ψ j S p ( q ) , * : j = 1 , N ¯ } can be ortonormal, that is
M ψ ¯ j ψ k d ν = δ j k
for all j , k = 1 , N ¯ . Let now Q D 1 ( 0 ) be a countable everywhere dense subset of the unit disc D 1 ( 0 ) of the Euclidean space E N : = ( C N ; · | · ) . Then, for every vector c D 1 ( 0 ) , one finds that the function g c : = c | ψ L 2 ( M , d ν ) , that is g c 2 1 , owing to (15)
g c R q ˜ .
Taking into account the fact that the set Q D 1 ( 0 ) is countable, one can find such a measurable subset M M that the measure ν ( M ) = 1 and | g c ( u ) | R q ˜ for all vectors c Q D 1 ( 0 ) and all points u M . Since at a fixed point u M the mapping D 1 ( 0 ) c | g c ( u ) | R is continuous on D 1 ( 0 ) E N , one can extend this function on the whole disc D 1 ( 0 ) , obtaining the inequality
| g c ( u ) | R q ˜
already for all c D 1 ( 0 ) and u M . Making use of the arbitrariness of the vector c D 1 ( 0 ) , it can be chosen as c : = ψ ¯ ( u ) | ψ ( u ) | D 1 ( 0 ) S p ( q ) , * , u M , giving rise to the following inequality: | ψ ( u ) | R q ˜ , or
| ψ ( u ) | 2 R q ˜ 2 .
Having integrated the inequality (19) over M M , one finds that N R q ˜ 2 < . The latter means that dim S p ( q ) , * max N < , being equivalent to the condition that dim S p ( q ) max N < , thus proving the theorem. □
As a consequence, we also state that the closed subspace S p ( q ) L p ( M , d μ ) L q ( M , d ν ) is isomorphic to the L 2 -subspace of L ( M , d ν ) L q ˜ ( M , d ν ) , 1 / q + 1 / q ˜ = 1 .

3. Conclusions

We studied a classical problem of finding finite-dimensional effective criteria for closed subspaces in L p , endowed with some additional functional constraints. We considered a closed topological subspace S p ( q ) of the functional Banach space L p ( M , d μ ) and, moreover, assumed that additionally, S p ( q ) L q ( M , d ν ) is subject to a probability measure ν on M . Then, we showed that closed subspaces of L p ( M , d μ ) L q ( M , d ν ) for q > max { 1 , p } , p > 0 , are finite dimensional, if the measures μ , ν are probabilistic on M and the measure μ is absolutely continuous with respect to the measure ν on M . The finite dimensionality result concerning the case when q > p > 0 is open and needs more sophisticated techniques, mainly based on analysis of the complementary subspaces to L p ( M , d μ ) L q ( M , d ν ) .

Author Contributions

The article was conceptualized by A.K.P. and the final manuscript preparation was done jointly by A.A.B. and A.K.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The APC was funded by a local research grant F-2/370/2018/DS from the Department of Computer Science and Telecommunications at the Cracov University of Technology.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to T. Banach, Ya. Mykytyuk and A. Plichko for their instructive discussions and suggestions. They are especially indebted to the referees whose remarks, comments and suggestions were both very useful and instrumental during the preparation of the final version of the manuscript. The acknowledgements belong also to the Department of Computer Science and Telecommunications at the Cracov University of Technology for a local research grant F-2/370/2018/DS.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Astashkin, S.V.; Maligranda, L. Lp + L and LpL are not isomorphic for all 1 ≤ p < , p ≠ 2. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2018, 146, 2181–2194. [Google Scholar]
  2. Banakh, I.; Banakh, T.; Plichko, A.; Prykarpatsky, A.K. On local convexity of nonlinear mappings between Banach spaces. Cent. Eur. J. Math. 2012, 10, 2264–2271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Prykarpatsky, A.K.; Blackmore, D. A solution set analysis of a nonlinear operator equation using a Leray Schauder type fixed point approach. Topology 2009, 48, 182–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Butzer, P.L.; Berens, H. Approximation; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1967. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kreĭn, S.G.; Petunīn, Y.I.; Semënov, E.M. Interpolation of Linear Operators, Translations of Mathematical Monographs; American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, USA, 1982; Volume 54. [Google Scholar]
  6. Foias, C.; Sell, G.R.; Temam, R. Inertial mathifolds for nonlinear evolution equations. J. Diff. Eqs. 1988, 73, 309–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Kato, T. Nonlinear evolution equations in Banach spaces. Proc. Symp. Pure Appl. Math. 1986, 45, 9–23. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ladyzhenskaya, O.A. Finite-dimensionality of bounded invariant sets for Navier–Stokes systems and other dissipative systems. Zap. Nauchnykh Semin. POMI 1982, 115, 137–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ladyzhenskaya, O.A. Estimates of the fractal dimension and of the number of deterministic modes for invariant sets of dynamical sytsems. Zap. Nauchnykh Semin. POMI 1987, 163, 105–129. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ninomiya, H. Some remarks on inertial manifolds. J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 1992, 32, 667–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Temam, R. Infinite-dimernsional Dynamical systems in fluid mechanics. Proc. Symp. Pure Appl. Math. 1986, 45, 431–445. [Google Scholar]
  12. Alspach, D.E.; Odell, E.W. Functional Analysis: Proceedings of the Seminar at the University of Texas, 1986–1987; Odell, E.W., Rosenthal, P., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lewis, D.R. Ellipsoids defined by Banach ideal norms. Mathematika 1979, 26, 18–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Johnson, W.B.; Schechtman, G. Finite Dimensional Subspaces of Lp; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2001; pp. 1–40. [Google Scholar]
  15. Balinsky, A.A.; Prykarpatski, A.K. On finite-dimensionality of closed subspaces in Lp(M, ) ∩ Lq(M, dν). In Proceedings of the Abstracts of the International Conference in Complex and Functional Analysis (Dedicated to the Memory of Bohdan Vynnytskyi), Drohobych, Ukraine, 13–16 September 2021. [Google Scholar]
  16. Banach, S. Theorie des Operations Lineaires; PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 1932. [Google Scholar]
  17. Banakh, T.; Lyantse, W.E.; Mykytyuk, Y.V. -Convex sets and their applications to the proof of certain classical theoremsof functional analysis. Mat. Stud. 1999, 11, 83–84. [Google Scholar]
  18. Reed, M.; Simon, B. Functional Analysis. v. 1. Methods of Mathematical Physics; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  19. Tao, T. An Introduction to Measure Theory, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, v. 126; American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lieb, E.H.; Loss, M. Analysis, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, v. 14; American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  21. Grothendieck, A. Sur certains sous-espaces vectoriels de Lp. Can. J. Math. 1954, 6, 158–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Balinsky, A.A.; Prykarpatski, A.K. On the Finite Dimensionality of Closed Subspaces in Lp(M, ) ∩ Lq(M, ). Axioms 2021, 10, 275. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms10040275

AMA Style

Balinsky AA, Prykarpatski AK. On the Finite Dimensionality of Closed Subspaces in Lp(M, ) ∩ Lq(M, ). Axioms. 2021; 10(4):275. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms10040275

Chicago/Turabian Style

Balinsky, Alexander A., and Anatolij K. Prykarpatski. 2021. "On the Finite Dimensionality of Closed Subspaces in Lp(M, ) ∩ Lq(M, )" Axioms 10, no. 4: 275. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms10040275

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop