Next Article in Journal
Coupled Optimal Results with an Application to Nonlinear Integral Equations
Next Article in Special Issue
Common Fixed Point Results for Almost g-Geraghty Type Contraction Mappings in b2-Metric Spaces with an Application to Integral Equations
Previous Article in Journal
On Convex F-Contraction in b-Metric Spaces
Previous Article in Special Issue
Banach Contraction Principle and Meir–Keeler Type of Fixed Point Theorems for Pre-Metric Spaces
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fixed Points Results for Various Types of Tricyclic Contractions

Laboratory of Algebra, Analysis and Applications (L3A), Departement of Mathematics and Computer Science, Faculty of Sciences Ben M’sik, Hassan II University of Casablanca, Casablanca 20000, Morocco
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Axioms 2021, 10(2), 72; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms10020072
Submission received: 8 March 2021 / Revised: 7 April 2021 / Accepted: 8 April 2021 / Published: 20 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Theory and Application of Fixed Point)

Abstract

:
In this paper, we introduce four new types of contractions called in this order Kanan-S-type tricyclic contraction, Chattergea-S-type tricyclic contraction, Riech-S-type tricyclic contraction, Cirić-S-type tricyclic contraction, and we prove the existence and uniqueness for a fixed point for each situation.

1. Introduction

It is well known that the Banach contraction principle was published in 1922 by S. Banach as follows:
Theorem 1.
Let X , d be a complete metric space and a self mapping T : X X . If there exists k [ 0 , 1 ) such that, for all x , y X , d ( T x , T y ) k d ( x , y ) , then T has a unique fixed point in X .
The Banach contraction principle has been extensively studied and different generalizations were obtained.
In 1968 [1], Kannan established his famous extension of this contraction.
Theorem 2.
Ref. [1] Let X , d be a complete metric space and a self mapping T : X X . If T satisfies the following condition:
d ( T x , T y ) k d ( x , T x ) + d ( y , T y ) f o r a l l x , y X w h e r e 0 < k < 1 2 ,
then T has a fixed point in X .
A similar contractive condition has been introduced by Chattergea in 1972 [2] as follows:
Theorem 3.
Ref. [2] Let T : X X , where X , d is a complete metric space. If there exists 0 < k < 1 2 such that
d ( T x , T y ) k d ( y , T x ) + d ( T y , x ) f o r a l l x , y X ,
then T has a fixed point in X .
We can also find another extension of the Banach contraction principle obtained by S. Reich, Kannan in 1971 [3].
Theorem 4.
Ref. [3] Let T : X X , where X , d is a complete metric space. If there exists 0 < k < 1 3 such that
d ( T x , T y ) k d ( x , y ) + d ( x , T x ) + d ( y , T y ) f o r a l l x , y X ,
then T has a fixed point in X .
In addition, in the same year, Cirić gave the following extension [4].
Theorem 5.
Ref. [4] Let T : X X , where X , d a complete metric space. If there exists k [ 0 , 1 ) such that
d ( T x , T y ) k M a x d ( x , y ) , d ( x , T x ) , d ( y , T y ) , d ( y , T x ) , d ( T y , x ) f o r a l l x , y X ,
then T has a fixed point in X .
Many authors have investigated these situations and many results were proved (see [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]).
In this article, we prove the uniqueness and existence of the fixed points in different types contractions for a self mapping T defined on the union of tree closed subsets of a complete metric space with k in different intervals.

2. Preliminaries

In best approximation theory, the concept of tricyclic mappings extends that of ordinary cyclic mappings. Moreover, in the case where two of the sets, say A and C, coincide, we find a cyclic mapping which is also a self-map, and, hence, a best proximity point result for a tricyclic mappings means also a fixed point and a best proximity point result for a self-map and a cyclic mapping.
Definition 1.
Let A, B be nonempty subsets of a metric space X , d . A mapping T : A B A B is said to be cyclic if:
T A   B , T B   A .
In 2003, Kirk et al. [14] proved that, if T : A B A B is cyclic and, for some k   0 , 1 , d T x , T y   k d x , y for all x A , y B , then A B , and T has a unique fixed point in A B .
In 2017, Sabar et al. [15] proved a similar result for tricyclic mappings and introduced the concept of tricyclic contractions.
Theorem 6.
Ref. [15] Let A , B and C be nonempty closed subsets of a complete metric space X , d , and let a mapping T : A B C A B C . If T A   B , T B   C and T C   A and there exists k   0 , 1 such that D T x , T y , T z   k D x , y , z for all x , y , z   A × B × C , then A B C is nonempty and T has a unique fixed point in A B C ,
where D x , y , z   = d ( x , y ) + d ( x , z ) + d ( y , z ) .
Definition 2.
Ref. [15] Let A , B and C be nonempty subsets of a metric space X , d . A mapping T : A B C A B C is said to be tricyclic contracton if there exists 0 < k < 1 such that:
1.
T A   B , T B   C and T C   A .
2.
D T x , T y , T z   k D x , y , z + ( 1 k ) δ A , B , C for all x , y , z   A × B × C .
where δ A , B , C   = inf { D x , y , z : x A , y B , z C }
Very Recently, Sabiri et al. introduced an extension of the aforementioned mappings and called them p-cyclic contractions [16].

3. Main Results

Definition 3.
Let A , B and C be nonempty subsets of a metric space X , d . A mapping T : A B C A B C is said to be a Kannan-S-type tricyclic contraction, if there exists k   0 , 1 3 such that
1.
T A   B , T B   C , T C   A .
2.
D T x , T y , T z   k d x , T x   +   d y , T y   +   d z , T z for all x , y , z   A × B × C .
We give an example to show that a map can be a tricyclic contraction but not a Kannan-S-type tricyclic contraction.
Example 1.
Let X be R 2 normed by the norm ( x , y ) =   x   +   y , and A = [ 1 , 2 ] × { 0 } , B = { 0 } × [ 2 , 1 ] , C = [ 2 , 1 ] × { 0 } , then
δ A , B , C   = D ( ( 1 , 0 ) , ( 0 , 1 ) , ( 1 , 0 ) ) = 6 .
Put T : A B C A B C such that
T x , 0   =   0 , x + 2 3 i f x , 0   A ,
T 0 , y   =   y 2 3 , 0 i f 0 , y   B ,
T z , 0   =   z 2 3 , 0 i f z , 0   C ,
We have T A   B , T B   C and T C   A , and
D ( T x , 0 , T 0 , y , T z , 0 ) = D ( 0 , x + 2 3 ) , ( y 2 3 , 0 ) , ( z 2 3 , 0 ) = 2 3 ( x y z ) + 4 = 1 3 D ( x , 0 , 0 , y , z , 0 ) + 4 = 1 3 D ( x , 0 , 0 , y , z , 0 ) + ( 1 1 3 ) δ A , B , C
for all x , 0   A , 0 , y   B , z , 0   C .
On the other hand,
D ( T 2 , 0 , T 0 , 2 , T 2 , 0 ) = D ( 0 , 4 3 ) , ( 4 3 , 0 ) , ( 4 3 , 0 ) = 8
and
d ( 2 , 0 , T 2 , 0 ) + d ( 0 , 2 , T 0 , 2 ) + d ( 2 , 0 , T 2 , 0 ) = 10 ,
which implies that
D ( T 2 , 0 , T 0 , 2 , T 2 , 0 )
> 1 3 d ( 2 , 0 , T 2 , 0 ) + d ( 0 , 2 , T 0 , 2 ) + d ( 2 , 0 , T 2 , 0 )
Then, T is tricyclic contraction but not a Kannan-S-type tricyclic contraction.
Now, we give an example for which T is a Kannan-S-type tricyclic contraction but not a tricyclic contraction.
Example 2.
Let X = R with the usual metric. Let A = B = C =   0 , 1 , then δ A , B , C   = 0 . Put T : A B C A B C such that
T x = 1 6 i f 0 x < 1 , T x = 1 4 i f x = 1
For x = 1 , y = 1 and z = 23 24 , we have
D ( T ( 1 ) , T ( 1 ) , T ( 23 24 ) ) = D ( 1 4 , 1 4 , 1 6 ) = 2 d ( 1 4 , 1 6 ) = 1 6 .
and
D ( 1 , 1 , 23 24 ) = 2 d ( 1 , 23 24 ) = 1 12 .
Then, T is not tricyclic contraction.
However T is a Kannan-S-type tricyclic contraction. Indeed:
  • If x = y = z = 1 , we have
    D ( T ( 1 ) , T ( 1 ) , T ( 1 ) ) = 0 9 4 k
    for all k 0 , then for 0 k < 1 3 .
  • If x 0 , 1 , y 0 , 1 and z 0 , 1 , we have
    D ( T x , T y , T z ) = 0 k ( d ( x , 1 6 ) + d ( y , 1 6 ) + d ( z , 1 6 )
    for all k 0 , then for 0 k < 1 3 .
  • If x = 1 , y 0 , 1 and z 0 , 1 , we have
    D ( T 1 , T y , T z ) = D ( 1 4 , 1 6 , 1 6 ) = 1 6
    and
    d ( 1 , T ( 1 ) ) + d ( y , T y ) + d ( z , T z ) = 3 4 + d ( y , 1 6 ) + d ( z , 1 6 ) ,
    then, for k = 2 9 , we have
    D ( T ( 1 ) , T ( y , T z ) k ( d ( 1 , T ( 1 ) ) + d ( y , T y ) + d ( z , T z ) ) .
  • If x = 1 , y = 1 and z 0 , 1 , we have
    D ( T ( 1 ) , T ( 1 ) , T z ) = D ( 1 4 , 1 4 , 1 6 ) = 1 6
    and
    d ( 1 , T ( 1 ) ) + d ( 1 , T ( 1 ) ) + d ( z , T z ) = 3 2 + d ( z , 1 6 ) .
    Then, for k = 2 9 , we have
    D ( T ( 1 ) , T ( 1 ) , T z ) k ( d ( 1 , T ( 1 ) ) + d ( 1 , T ( 1 ) ) + d ( z , T z ) ) .
    Consequently, for k = 2 9 , we have:
    D ( T x , T y , T z ) k ( d ( x , T x ) + d ( y , T y ) + d ( z , T z ) ) f o r a l l x , y , z   A × B × C .
Theorem 7.
Let A , B and C be nonempty closed subsets of a complete metric space X , d , and let T : A B C A B C be a Kannan-S-type tricyclic contraction. Then, T has a unique fixed point in A B C .
Proof. 
Fix x A . We have
d T 3 x , T 2 x   D T 3 x , T 2 x , T x   k d T 2 x , T 3 x   +   d T x , T 2 x   +   d x , T x .
Then,
d T 3 x , T 2 x   k d T 2 x , T 3 x   +   d T x , T 2 x   +   d x , T x ,
which implies
d T 3 x , T 2 x   k ( 1 k ) d T x , T 2 x   +   d x , T x .
Similarly, we have
d T 2 x , T x   k ( 1 k ) d T 3 x , T 2 x   +   d x , T x
d T 2 x , T x   k ( 1 k ) k ( 1 k ) d T x , T 2 x   +   d x , T x   +   d x , T x
d T 2 x , T x   k 1 2 k ( d x , T x ) .
Then,
d T 2 x , T x   t d x , T x where t = k 1 2 k and t   0 , 1 ,
which implies
d T n + 1 x , T n x   t n d x , T x , for all n 1
Consequently,
+ n = 1 d T n + 1 x , T n x   ( + n = 1 t n ) d x , T x < +
implies that { T n x } is a Cauchy sequence in X , d . Hence, there exists z A B C such that T n x z . Notice that { T 3 n x } is a sequence in A , { T 3 n 1 x } is a sequence in C and { T 3 n 2 x } is a sequence in B and that both sequences tend to the same limit z. Regarding the fact that A , B and C are closed, we conclude z A B C , hence A B C .
To show that z is a fixed point, we must show that T z = z . Observe that
d T z , z = lim d T z , T 3 n x lim D T 3 n x , T 3 n 1 x , T z lim k [ d T 3 n 1 x , T 3 n x + d T 3 n 2 x , T 3 n 1 x + d ( z , T z ) ] k d T z , z ,
which is equivalent to
1 k d T z , z = 0 .
Since k 0 , 1 3 , then d T z , z = 0 , which implies T z = z .
To prove the uniqueness of z , assume that there exists w A B C such that w z and T w = w . Taking into account that T is tricyclic, we get w A B C . We have
d z , w = d T z , T w D T z , T w , T w k [ d z , T z + d w , T w + d w , T w ] = 0
which implies d z , w = 0 . We get that z = w and hence z is the unique fixed point of T .  □
Example 3.
Let X be R 2 normed by the norm x , y = x + y , let A = { 0 } × [ 0 , + 1 ] , B = [ 0 , + 1 ] × { 0 } , C = { 0 } × [ 1 , 0 ] and let T : A B C A B C be defined by
T 0 , x   =   x 6 , 0 i f 0 , x   A ,
T y , 0   =   0 , y 6 i f y , 0   B ,
T 0 , z   =   0 , z 6 i f 0 , z   C .
We have
T A   B , T B   C and T C   A
In addition, for all 0 , x   A ,   y , 0   B ,   0 , z   C , we have
D T 0 , x , T y , 0 , T 0 , z   = D x 6 , 0 , 0 , y 6 , 0 , z 6   = 1 3 ( x + y z )
In addition, we have
d 0 , x , T 0 , x + d y , 0 , T y , 0 + d 0 , z , T 0 , z = 7 6 ( x + y z )
This implies
D T 0 , x , T y , 0 , T 0 , z = 2 7 d 0 , x , T 0 , x + d y , 0 , T y , 0 + d 0 , z , T 0 , z .
Then, T is a Kannan-S-type tricyclic contraction, and T has a unique fixed point 0 , 0 in A B C .
Corollary 1.
Let ( X , d ) be a complete metric space and a self mapping T : X X . If there exists k 0 , 1 3 such that
D T x , T y , T z k d x , T x + d y , T y + d z , T z
for all x , y , z X 3 , then T has a unique fixed point.
Now, we shall define another type of a tricyclic contraction.
Definition 4.
Let A , B and C be nonempty subsets of a metric space X , d . A mapping T : A B C A B C is said to be a Chattergea-S-type tricyclic contraction if T A B , T B C , T C A , and there exist k 0 , 1 3 such that D T x , T y , T z k d y , T x + d z , T y + d x , T z for all x , y , z A × B × C .
Theorem 8.
Let A , B and C be nonempty closed subsets of a complete metric space X , d , and let T : A B C A B C be a Chattergea-S-type tricyclic contraction. Then, T has a unique fixed point in A B C .
Proof. 
Fix x A . We have
D T x , T 2 x , T 3 x k d T x , T x + d T 2 x , T 2 x + d T 3 x , x
which implies
D T 3 x , T 2 x , T x k d T 3 x , x
so
d T 3 x , T 2 x k d T 3 x , T 2 x + d T 2 x , T x + d T x , x ( by the triangular inequality )
d T 3 x , T 2 x k ( 1 k ) d T x , T 2 x + d x , T x
and
d T 2 x , T x D T 3 x , T 2 x , T x k ( 1 k ) d T 3 x , T 2 x + d x , T x
d T 2 x , T x k ( 1 k ) k ( 1 k ) d T x , T 2 x + d x , T x + d x , T x
d T 2 x , T x k 1 2 k ( d x , T x )
Then,
d T 2 x , T x t d x , T x where t = k 1 2 k and t 0 , 1 ,
which implies
d T n + 1 x , T n x t n d x , T x
for all n 1 . Consequently,
+ n = 1 d T n + 1 x , T n x ( + n = 1 t n ) d x , T x < +
implies that { T n x } is a Cauchy sequence in X , d . Hence, there exists z A B C such that T n x z . Notice that { T 3 n x } is a sequence in A , { T 3 n 1 x } is a sequence in C, and { T 3 n 2 x } is a sequence in B and that both sequences tend to the same limit z. Regarding that A , B and C are closed, we conclude z A B C , hence A B C .
To show that z is a fixed point, we must show that T z = z . Observe that
d T z , z = lim d T z , T 3 n x   lim D T z , T 3 n x , T 3 n 1 x lim k [ d T 3 n 1 x , T z   +   T 3 n 2 x , T 3 n x   +   d ( z , T 3 n 1 x ) ] k d T z , z ,
which is equivalent to 1 k d T z , z   = 0 . Since k 1 , 1 3 , then d T z , z = 0 , which implies T z = z .
To prove the uniqueness of z , assume that there exists w A B C such that w z and T w = w . Taking into account that T is tricyclic, we get w A B C .
We have
d z , w = d T z , T w D T z , T w , T w k [ d T z , w + d T w , w + d T w , z ] 2 k d z , w .
Then, d z , w = 0 . We conclude that z = w and hence z is the unique fixed point of T .  □
Corollary 2.
Let ( X , d ) be a complete metric space and a self mapping T : X X . If there exists k 0 , 1 3 such that
D T x , T y , T z k d y , T x + d z , T y + d x , T z
for all x , y , z X 3 , then T has a unique fixed point.
In this step, we define a Reich-S-type tricyclic contraction.
Definition 5.
Let A , B and C be nonempty subsets of a metric space X , d .
A mapping T : A B C A B C is said to be a Reich-S-type tricyclic contraction if there exists k 0 , 1 7 such that:
1.
T A B , T B C , T C A .
2.
D T x , T y , T z k D x , y , z + d x , T x + d y , T y + d z , T z for all x , y , z A × B × C .
Theorem 9.
Let A , B and C be nonempty closed subsets of a complete metric space X , d , and let T : A B C A B C be a Reich-S-type tricyclic contraction. Then, T has a unique fixed point in A B C .
Proof. 
Fix x A . We have
d T 2 x , T 3 x D T x , T 2 x , T 3 x k D ( x , T x , T 2 x ) + d T 2 x , T 3 x + d T x , T 2 x + d x , T x
d T 2 x , T 3 x 1 k k [ 2 d T 2 x , T x + 2 d x , T x + d T 2 x , x ]
d T 2 x , T 3 x k 1 k 2 d T 2 x , T x + 2 d x , T x + d T 2 x , x k 1 k 2 d T 2 x , T x + 2 d x , T x + d T 2 x , T x + d T x , x k 1 k 3 d T 2 x , T x + 3 d x , T x
d T 2 x , T 3 x 3 k 1 k [ d T 2 x , T x + d x , T x ]
and
d T 2 x , T x D T x , T 2 x , T 3 x k D ( x , T x , T 2 x ) + d T 2 x , T 3 x + d T x , T 2 x + d x , T x
d T 2 x , T x k 3 d T 2 x , T x + 3 d x , T x + d T 2 x , T 3 x
d T 2 x , T x 1 3 k k [ d T 2 x , T 3 x + 3 d x , T x ]
d T 2 x , T x k 1 3 k d T 2 x , T 3 x + 3 k 1 3 k d x , T x
d T 2 x , T x k 1 3 k 3 k 1 k [ d T 2 x , T x + d x , T x ] + 3 k 1 3 k d x , T x
d T 2 x , T x 3 k 2 1 3 k 1 k d T 2 x , T x + ( 3 k 2 1 3 k 1 k + 3 k 1 3 k ) d x , T x
d T 2 x , T x 1 3 k 2 1 3 k 1 k 3 k 2 + 3 k 1 k 1 3 k 1 k d x , T x
d T 2 x , T x 1 3 k 1 k 3 k 2 ( 3 k 2 + 3 k 1 k ) d x , T x
d T 2 x , T x 1 4 k 3 k d x , T x
d T 2 x , T x 3 k 1 4 k d x , T x .
Then,
d T 2 x , T x t d x , T x where t = 3 k 1 4 k and t 0 , 1 ,
which implies
d T n + 1 x , T n x t n d x , T x ,
consequently
+ n = 1 d T n + 1 x , T n x ( + n = 1 t n ) d x , T x < +
This implies that { T n x } is a Cauchy sequence in X , d . Hence, there exists z A B C such that T n x z . Notice that { T 3 n x } is a sequence in A , { T 3 n 1 x } is a sequence in C and { T 3 n 2 x } is a sequence in B and that both sequences tend to the same limit z. Regarding the fact that A , B and C are closed, we conclude that z A B C , hence A B C .
To show that z is a fixed point, we must show that T z = z . Observe that
d T z , z = lim d T z , T 3 n x lim D T 3 n x , T 3 n 1 x , T z lim k [ d T 3 n 1 x , T 3 n 2 x + d T 3 n 1 x , z + d ( T 3 n 2 x , z ) + d T 3 n 1 x , T 3 n x + d T 3 n 2 x , T 3 n 1 x + d z , T z ] k d T z , z ,
which is equivalent to 1 k d T z , z = 0 .
Since k 0 , 1 7 , then d T z , z = 0 , which implies T z = z .
To prove the uniqueness of z , assume that there exists w A B C such that w z and T w = w . Taking into account that T is tricyclic, we get w A B C .
d z , w = d T z , T w D T z , T w , T w k [ 2 d z , w + d w , w + d z , T z + d T w , w + d T w , w ] 2 k d z , w
implies d z , w = 0 . We conclude that z = w and hence z is the unique fixed point of T .  □
Example 4.
We take the same example 3.
Let X be R 2 normed by the norm x , y = x + y ,
A = { 0 } × [ 0 , + 1 ] , B = [ 0 , + 1 ] × { 0 } , C = { 0 } × [ 1 , 0 ]
and let T : A B C A B C be defined by
T 0 , x = x 6 , 0 i f 0 , x A ,
T y , 0 = 0 , y 6 i f y , 0 B ,
T 0 , z = 0 , z 6 i f 0 , z C ,
We have T is tricyclic and for all 0 , x A , y , 0 B , 0 , z C ,
D T 0 , x , T y , 0 , T 0 , z = D x 6 , 0 , 0 , y 6 , 0 , z 6 = 1 3 ( x + y z ) .
In addition, we have
D ( 0 , x , y , 0 , 0 , z ) + d 0 , x , T 0 , x + d y , 0 , T y , 0 + d 0 , z , T 0 , z
= 2 ( x + y z ) + 7 6 ( x + y z ) = 19 6 ( x + y z ) .
Then,
D T 0 , x , T y , 0 , T 0 , z = 2 19 ( D ( 0 , x , y , 0 , 0 , z ) + d 0 , x , T 0 , x + d y , 0 , T y , 0 + d 0 , z , T 0 , z ) 1 7 ( D ( 0 , x , y , 0 , 0 , z ) + d 0 , x , T 0 , x + d y , 0 , T y , 0 + d 0 , z , T 0 , z )
This implies that T is a Reich-S-type tricyclic contraction, and T has a unique fixed point 0 , 0 in A B C .
Corollary 3.
Let ( X , d ) a complete metric space and a self mapping T : X X . If there exists k 0 , 1 7 such that
D T x , T y , T z k D x , y , z + d x , T x + d y , T y + d z , T z
for all x , y , z X 3 , then T has a unique fixed point in X.
The next tricyclic contraction considered in this section is the Cirić-S-type tricyclic contraction defined below.
Definition 6.
Let A , B and C be nonempty subsets of a metric space X , d , T : A B C A B C be a Cirié-S-type tricyclic contraction, if there exists k   0 , 1 such that
1.
T A   B , T B   C , T C   A
2.
D T x , T y , T z   k M x , y , z for all x , y , z A × B × C .
where M x , y , z = max { D x , y , z , d x , T x , d y , T y , d z , T z }
The fixed point theorem of the Cirić-S-type tricyclic contraction reads as follows.
Theorem 10.
Let A , B and C be nonempty closed subsets of a complete metric space X , d , and let T : A B C A B C be a Cirić-S- type tricyclic contraction, then T has a unique fixed point in A B C .
Proof. 
Taking x A , we have D T x , T y , T z k M x , y , z for all x , y , z A × B × C . If M x , y , z = D x , y , z , Theorem 7 implies the desired result.
Consider the case M x , y , z = d x , T x . We have:
D T x , T 2 x , T 3 x k d x , T x d T x , T 2 x k d x , T x d T n x , T n + 1 x k n d x , T x
Consequently,
+ n = 1 d T n + 1 x , T n x ( + n = 1 k n ) d x , T x < +
which implies that { T n x } is a Cauchy sequence in X , d . Hence, there exists z A B C such that T n x z . Notice that { T 3 n x } is a sequence in A , { T 3 n 1 x } is a sequence in C, and { T 3 n 2 x } is a sequence in B and that both sequences tend to the same limit z; regarding the fact that A , B and C are closed, we conclude z A B C , hence A B C .
To show that z is a fixed point, we must show that T z = z . Observe that
d T z , z = lim d T z , T 3 n x   lim D T 3 n x , T 3 n 1 x , T z k d T z , z ,
which is equivalent to 1 k d T z , z = 0 . Since k 0 , 1 , then d T z , z = 0 , which implies T z = z .
To prove the uniqueness of z , assume that there exists w A B C such that w z and T w = w .
Taking into account that T is tricyclic, we get w A B C .
d z , w = d T z , T w D T z , T w , T w k d ( z , T z ) = 0 implies d z , w = 0 . We conclude that z = w and hence z is the unique fixed point of T .
Consider the case M x , y , z = d y , T y . We have:
D T x , T 2 x , T 3 x k d T x , T 2 x d T x , T 2 x k d T x , T 2 x < d T x , T 2 x ,
which is impossible since k 0 , 1
Consider the case M x , y , z = d z , T z . We have:
D T x , T 2 x , T 3 x k d T 2 x , T 3 x d T 2 x , T 3 x k d T 2 x , T 3 x < d T 2 x , T 3 x ,
which is impossible since k 0 , 1 .  □
Corollary 4.
Let A , B and C be a nonempty subset of a complete metric space X , d and let a mapping T : A B C A B C . If there exists k 0 , 1 such that
1.
T A B , T B C , T C A .
2.
D T x , T y , T z k max { D x , y , z , d x , T x } x , y , z A × B × C .
Then, T has a unique fixed point in A B C .

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S. and A.B.; validation, M.S., J.M. and A.B.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S. and J.M.; writing—review and editing, A.B. and T.S.; supervision, J.M. and A.B.; project administration, M.S. and J.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kannan, R. Some results on fixed points. Bull. Calcutta. Math. Soc. 1968, 60, 71–76. [Google Scholar]
  2. Chatterjea, S.K. Fixed point theorems. C. R. Acad. Bulgare Sci. 1972, 25, 727–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Reich, S. Kannan’s. Fixed point theorem. Boll. Dell’Unione Mat. Ital. 1971, 4, 459–465. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cirić, L.B. A generalization of Bannach’s contraction priciple. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1974, 45, 267–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Reich, S. Some remarks concerning contraction mappings, canad. Math. Bull. 1971, 14, 121–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Eldred, A.A.; Veeramani, P. Existance and converence of best proximity points. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2006, 323, 1001–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Krapinar, E.; Erhan, I.M. Best on different Type Contractions. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 2011, 5, 558–569. [Google Scholar]
  8. Petric, M.A. Best proximity point theorems for weak cyclic Kannan contractions. Filmat 2011, 25, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wong, C. On Kannan maps. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1975, 47, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Todorcević, V. Harmonic Quasiconformal Mappings and Hyper-Bolic Type Metrics; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  11. Radenović, S. Some remarks on mappings satisfying cyclical con- tractive conditions. Afr. Mat. 2016, 27, 291–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zaslavski, A.J. Two fixed point results for a class of mappings of contractive type. J. Nonlinear Var. Anal. 2018, 2, 113–119. [Google Scholar]
  13. Reich, S.; Zaslavski, A.J. Monotone contractive mappings. J. Nonlinear Var. Anal. 2017, 1, 391–401. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kirk, W.A.; Srinivasan, P.S.; Veeramani, P. Fixed point fo mappings satisfyaing cyclical contractive conditions. Fixed Point Theory 2003, 4, 79–89. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sabar, T.; Bassou, M.A. Best proximity point of tricyclic contraction. Adv. Fixed Point Ttheory 2017, 7, 512–523. [Google Scholar]
  16. Sabiri, M.; Mouline, J.; Bassou, A.; Sabar, T. A New Best Approximation Result in (S) Convex Metric spaces. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2020, 2020, 4367482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sabiri, M.; Bassou, A.; Mouline, J.; Sabar, T. Fixed Points Results for Various Types of Tricyclic Contractions. Axioms 2021, 10, 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms10020072

AMA Style

Sabiri M, Bassou A, Mouline J, Sabar T. Fixed Points Results for Various Types of Tricyclic Contractions. Axioms. 2021; 10(2):72. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms10020072

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sabiri, Mustapha, Abdelhafid Bassou, Jamal Mouline, and Taoufik Sabar. 2021. "Fixed Points Results for Various Types of Tricyclic Contractions" Axioms 10, no. 2: 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms10020072

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop