Next Article in Journal
Provenance and Geological Significance of Cenozoic Sandstones in the Nankang Basin, Southern Cathaysia Block, China
Previous Article in Journal
Using Brazilian Nepheline Syenite Waste as an Alternative Mineral Resource for Various Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optimizing Technological Parameters for Chromium Extraction from Chromite Ore Beneficiation Tailings

Institute of Metallurgy and Ore Beneficiation, Satbayev University, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2025, 15(6), 555; https://doi.org/10.3390/min15060555
Submission received: 5 May 2025 / Revised: 19 May 2025 / Accepted: 21 May 2025 / Published: 22 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy)

Abstract

:
This study focuses on optimizing the alkali roasting conditions for chromite beneficiation tailings with the goal of enhancing chromium oxide (Cr2O3) extraction. Within the experimental framework, the variables included roasting temperature, the amount of added Na2CO3, and reaction time. The results revealed that temperature is the most critical factor directly affecting the extraction efficiency. Increasing the amount of Na2CO3 contributed to an increase in Cr2O3 recovery, although excessive addition may not be economically justified. The optimal conditions—1000 °C, 120%–130% Na2CO3 (relative to tailings mass), and 120 min—enabled a Cr2O3 extraction rate of up to 98.6% through aqueous leaching. The phase transformation analysis confirmed the breakdown of the spinel structure and formation of water-soluble sodium chromate. Microanalysis observations and measurements validated the progressive destruction of chromite grains and sodium enrichment in the reaction zones. The remaining leaching residue consisted of inert Na2Mg2Si2O7 and MgO, suitable for further metal recovery. The proposed approach enables efficient detoxification of hazardous tailings and serves as a basis for integrated utilization of Cr-bearing industrial waste.

1. Introduction

Chromite ores typically contain 50%–70% Cr2O3 [1]. The primary use of chromium is in ferrochrome production, accounting for 95.2% of total demand [2]. Other uses constitute minor shares: foundry production—2.4%; chemical industry—1.6%; refractories—0.8% [3]. The leading global ferrochrome producers are South Africa, Kazakhstan, and India.
In Kazakhstan, chromite ore from the Kempirsai deposit in the Aktobe region is processed at the Donskoy Mining and Processing Plant (DMPP), which holds the world’s second-largest confirmed chromite reserves [4,5]. These ores are mineralogically heterogeneous, both in terms of composition and grain size of the chromite spinel. Based on the cementing matrix, chromite ores are classified into five groups: spinel grains cemented by magnesium silicates; iron oxides/hydroxides; highly ferruginous serpentine; quartz; and magnesium carbonates [6,7]. Grain size classes include coarse-grained (less than 20% < 0.1 mm), medium-grained (20%–40% < 0.1 mm), and fine-grained (more than 40% < 0.1 mm) chromite ores [8].
DMPP’s processing technology involves conventional gravity separation operations: crushing, heavy media separation, jigging, and spiral separation. While these methods effectively concentrate the coarser ore fractions, fine-grained tailings are poorly beneficiated due to difficulties in separating chromite from complex gangue minerals [9]. Up to 900,000 tons of chromite beneficiation tailings—also known as fine chromite sludge—are generated annually. DMPP has accumulated 14.5 million tons of such waste containing 20%–30% Cr2O3 [10]. These fine-grained tailings (CBTs—chromite beneficiation tailings) represent hazardous anthropogenic waste.
Due to the high toxicity of chromium compounds, such waste is typically subjected to treatment for hexavalent chromium detoxification before being landfilled [11,12,13]. Some chromate species found in chromite residues are highly soluble and can migrate through surface and groundwater, posing risks to human health and ecosystems. In China, for instance, 1800 water wells were contaminated and decommissioned due to chromium waste pollution [14,15].
Toxic chromate salts are primarily associated with sodium dichromate production. When produced by roasting with calcium additives, carcinogenic calcium chromate may form [14].
Stricter environmental regulations and the global push for sustainable resource management make the recycling of such waste not only desirable but economically advantageous. Several technologies have been developed for CBT recovery. One method involves preliminary activation in sodium bicarbonate, followed by leaching in ammonium bisulfate solution and centrifugal gravity concentration, yielding chromite concentrate with 59.2% Cr2O3 and 86.8% recovery [9]. Another method utilizes mild sulfuric acid leaching coupled with ozonation, achieving 65%–70% Cr recovery [16]. Yet another approach employs multi-stage thermal processing: initial thermal activation at 1000 °C, roasting with ammonium sulfate, water, and sulfuric acid at 300 °C, followed by water leaching at 90 °C, yielding a 49% Cr2O3 concentrate with 93.9% extraction efficiency [5].
However, methods targeting chromite concentrate production [5,9,15,16,17] do not achieve full utilization of the waste; the residual tailings still require landfilling. To mitigate environmental risks, a comprehensive recycling approach is needed. CBT has potential as polymetallic feedstock for extracting other valuable metals, such as magnesium, iron, aluminum, nickel, zinc, titanium, platinum group elements (PGEs), and rare earth elements (REEs). Processing technologies must be adapted to the unique chemical and mineralogical characteristics of CBT, aiming to recover the maximum amount of material. This would reduce hazardous waste accumulation, conserve land resources, and create new sources of critical raw materials.
This study investigates the use of alkali roasting as a first-stage processing step for CBT. The method of soda-based roasting is widely applied to chromite concentrates; however, CBT differs in composition, requiring dedicated study to validate the applicability of this method.
The goal of this research is to determine the optimal conditions for CBT roasting with sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) that enables maximum Cr2O3 recovery at reasonable energy and material costs. The roasting parameters (temperature, time, and reagent composition) significantly affect chromium extraction. To systematically study these effects, the Design of Experiments (DoE) methodology was employed, allowing the establishment of quantitative relationships between process variables and Cr2O3 recovery. This approach minimizes the number of experiments that need to be conducted while ensuring the statistical reliability of the results.
A crucial aspect of process optimization is understanding the phase transformations that occur during roasting and leaching. Despite the high chemical resistance of chromite, its interaction with alkaline agents at elevated temperatures leads to the formation of reactive phases, such as sodium chromates. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy with microanalysis (SEM-EPMA) were employed to track the transformations of chromium and other elements at various stages. This is essential for confirming the reaction mechanism and tailoring process parameters to the specific composition of CBT.
The novelty of this study lies in its focus on the efficient processing of low-grade chromite beneficiation tailings, a material typically underutilized due to its complex mineralogy. Unlike conventional works addressing chromite concentrates, this research provides a comprehensive approach combining experimental optimization (via DoE), in-depth phase transformation analysis, and environmental considerations. The proposed method not only achieves high Cr2O3 recovery from hazardous tailings but also aligns with circular economy strategies by enabling integrated waste valorization and resource recovery.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Description of Samples and Apparatus

To perform alkali roasting of chromite beneficiation tailings, a charge mixture was prepared based on the calculated proportions of components. The mixture was thoroughly homogenized in a laboratory ball mill for 30 min at 50 rpm, with a ball-to-powder ratio of 5:1, using 20 mm stainless steel balls in dry milling mode, followed by briquetting under a pressure of 5 MPa using a hydraulic press.
The briquetted samples were roasted at 800–1000 °C in a Nabertherm muffle furnace (Lilienthal, Germany) equipped with an oxygen supply system to maintain an oxidizing atmosphere inside the chamber.
Before leaching, the sintered products were ground in a porcelain ball mill to a particle size of −0.1 mm. Leaching was carried out by repulping the roasted samples in water at 80 °C with a liquid-to-solid (L/S) ratio of 4:1.
To investigate the physicochemical composition of the raw materials and processed products, a range of analytical techniques was employed. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis was conducted using a Venus 200 spectrometer with wavelength-dispersive capabilities (Malvern PANalytical B.V., Almelo, The Netherlands). Chemical composition was determined using an inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES), Optima 2000 DV (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). X-ray diffraction (XRD) data were collected on a Bruker D8 ADVANCE diffractometer (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) using copper Kα radiation at an accelerating voltage of 36 kV and a current of 25 mA. Microstructural and elemental analyses were performed using a JXA-8230 Electron Probe Microanalyzer (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan), operating at 20 mkV.

2.2. Experimental Design

The Design of Experiment (DoE) using response surface methodology (RSM) is a powerful tool for evaluating and optimizing hydrometallurgical process parameters. This mathematical and statistical method is also used to construct a second-degree model (Equation (1)) showing the relationship between the response (metal recovery) and the independent variables (target parameters).
y = b 0   + i = 1 k   b i   x i +     i = 1 k   b i i   x i 2 + i = 1 k 1   j = i + 1 k   b i j   X i X j
where y is the predicted response value, b 0   is a constant factor, and b i   , b i i   , and u  b i j   are the linearity coefficients, quadratic terms, and interactions, respectively; k is the number of factors.
Response surface methodology (RSM) investigates the relationship between several independent variables and one or more response variables [18]. Based on the sintering experimental results, a reasonable range for each experimental parameter was chosen for the experimental design (Table 1). The total number of experiments (N) are determined from Equation (2).
N = 2k + 2k + n0

3. Results and Discussion

Samples of chromite beneficiation tailings (CBTs) were collected from the Donskoy Mining and Processing Plant (DMPP). The chemical composition of the CBT, in wt.%, was as follows: Cr—19.34; Fe—9.45; Ni—0.44; Co—0.03; Zn—0.015; Mg—35.07; Si—31.86; Al—2.21; TiO2—0.21; total rare earth elements (ΣREEs)—0.025.
According to X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, the mineralogical composition of the CBTs is dominated by chemically stable phases, including chromite (49%), which is typical for processed chromite tailings, chrysotile (36%), and clinochlore (14.8%) (Figure 1).
The experimental results for Cr2O3 extraction via aqueous leaching of the soda-roasted CBTs, designed using response surface methodology (RSM), are summarized in Table 2.
Figure 2 presents diagnostic plots that confirm the statistical adequacy of the model constructed to describe Cr2O3 extraction from soda-roasted chromite tailings. Residuals follow a normal distribution (plot a), with random dispersion across predicted values (plot b), run order (plot c), and a strong correlation between actual and predicted values (plot d). The model exhibits no systematic errors and is considered to be statistically sound.
The residual plots presented in Figure 2 provide statistical validation of the regression model used to predict Cr2O3 extraction. The data points in all diagnostic plots are color-coded based on extraction efficiency: red dots represent high Cr2O3 recovery (>90%), blue indicates low values (<40%), while green (40%–70%) and yellow (70%–90%) represent intermediate ranges.
The normal plot of the residuals (Figure 2a) evaluates the normality assumption of the model errors. The residuals are closely aligned along the reference red line, indicating a normal distribution of errors and supporting the model’s adequacy. The internally studentized residuals range between approximately −2.14 and +1.66, which lies within the acceptable limits (±3). The close alignment and symmetric spread confirm that the model accurately describes the system, although minor deviations at the tails may suggest areas for refinement.
The residuals versus predicted values plot (Figure 2b) assesses whether the model exhibits systematic bias across the range of predicted responses. The residuals are randomly distributed around zero without any discernible trend, indicating homoscedasticity and absence of model misspecification. There is no apparent pattern, and all residuals fall within critical bounds (±3). Red points (high recovery) and blue points (low recovery) fall well within the limits, supporting the model’s reliability. This plot confirms that the model remains stable across the experimental domain and effectively captures the interaction of variables.
The residuals versus run plot (Figure 2c) checks for potential drifts or systemic errors over the sequence of experimental runs. The residuals are scattered randomly around the baseline with no trend, suggesting that the experimental process remained consistent over time. No outliers or anomalies were detected beyond the ± 3 threshold, indicating high experimental stability.
Finally, the predicted versus actual values plot (Figure 2d) evaluates the model’s predictive accuracy. Most of the data points are positioned along the diagonal line (y = x), indicating good agreement between the predicted and actual Cr2O3 recovery values. Slight deviations from the diagonal are observed in the low–middle range (up to ~60%), which may indicate minor systematic errors in this range. In the high recovery zone (>85%), predictions are more accurate, with red points closely following the diagonal. This suggests that the model is particularly effective at capturing behavior in the optimal extraction range.
Figure 3 shows the interaction between temperature and Na2CO3 dosage.
Figure 3a illustrates the influence of temperature and Na2CO3 addition on Cr2O3 extraction. The following trends are observed:
  • Cr2O3 extraction increases with rising temperature and Na2CO3 dosage.
  • At low temperatures and low Na2CO3 amounts, the extraction rate remains minimal (~6%–30%).
  • The optimal extraction zone (close to 98%) is achieved at high temperatures (above 950 °C) combined with Na2CO3 additions exceeding 130 g.
  • The response surface exhibits a nonlinear trend, indicating complex interactions between the variables, although a general positive correlation with both factors is evident.
The corresponding contour plot shows a consistent increase in Cr2O3 extraction as the temperature rises from 850 °C to 1000 °C. This behavior is expected, as higher temperatures accelerate phase transformations, enhance chromite reactivity with soda, and promote the formation of soluble chromium compounds.
Similarly, increasing the Na2CO3 addition from approximately 80 g to 150 g leads to moderate improvements in Cr2O3 extraction. However, at lower temperatures (850–900 °C), the benefits of additional soda are limited by insufficient thermal activation, with extraction rates remaining below 40%. Only when the roasting temperature exceeds 950 °C does the addition of 120–130 g Na2CO3 enable optimal Cr2O3 extraction in the range of 70%–98%.
Figure 4 presents the influence of temperature and roasting duration on Cr2O3 extraction under a constant Na2CO3 addition level.
The following conclusions can be drawn from the results:
  • Temperature continues to have a positive effect on Cr2O3 extraction, whereas the influence of roasting duration appears less straightforward.
  • At short roasting times (60–75 min), Cr2O3 extraction remains low, even under high-temperature conditions.
  • The optimal extraction zone is achieved at elevated temperatures (950–1000 °C) combined with roasting durations longer than 90 min.
  • The response surface exhibits a parabolic shape, indicating the existence of an optimal roasting time to achieve maximum Cr2O3 extraction.
Figure 5 shows the influence of Na2CO3 addition and roasting duration on Cr2O3 extraction at a fixed temperature of 925 °C.
Figure 5 illustrates the effect of Na2CO3 dosage and roasting duration on Cr2O3 extraction at a constant temperature of 925 °C.
The following trends are observed:
  • At this temperature, increasing Na2CO3 addition initially enhances Cr2O3 extraction; however, excessive soda levels may lead to a slight decline in extraction efficiency.
  • Roasting duration plays a critical role; at short times (60–75 min), extraction efficiency remains low regardless of Na2CO3 dosage.
  • The highest Cr2O3 extraction is achieved through an optimal combination of Na2CO3 addition (approximately 120–130 g) and roasting durations exceeding 90 min.
Thus, the overall conclusions are:
  • Temperature is the primary factor influencing Cr2O3 extraction, with higher temperatures favoring improved recovery.
  • Na2CO3 addition significantly boosts extraction, but excessive additions are not always economically justified.
  • Roasting durations longer than 90 min are necessary to achieve maximum extraction efficiencies.
The optimal roasting parameters determined for maximizing Cr2O3 recovery during subsequent aqueous leaching are: 1000 °C, 120%–130% Na2CO3 (relative to tailings mass), and 120 min roasting time.
The findings allow refining industrial roasting regimes to enhance the efficiency of chromium recovery processes.
Following roasting under the optimized conditions, a sintered product was obtained (Figure 6).
The chemical composition of the roasted sample (wt.%) is as follows:
Na2O—35.98%; Cr2O3—15.59%; Fe2O3—9.014%; NiO—0.423%; Co3O₄—0.042%; ZnO—0.018%; MgO—26.545%; SiO2—9.785%; Al2O3—1.426%; ΣREE—0.025%.
The phase composition of the roasted product, obtained by X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, is presented in Figure 7.
Figure 7 shows that roasting under optimal conditions leads to the complete breakdown of the original spinel structure, as evidenced by the disappearance of chromite peaks and the formation of water-soluble Na2CrO₄. Concurrently, the reaction of magnesium- and silicate-containing phases with sodium carbonate results in the formation of periclase (MgO) and mixed sodium–magnesium silicates. These transformations are typical for materials subjected to alkaline activation prior to leaching. The reaction for this process can be generalized as follows [19,20]:
4FeCr2O4 + 8Na2 + 7O2 → 8Na2CrO4 + 2Fe2O3 + 2CO2
Mg3Si₄O10(OH)2 + 3Na2CO3 → 3MgO + 4Na2SiO3 + 3CO2↑ + H2O↑
These reactions confirm the alkaline decomposition of refractory spinel and silicate phases and the successful formation of soluble and reactive products for subsequent hydrometallurgical processing.
A microstructural composition analysis was also conducted on the roasted samples using backscattered electron imaging using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), as shown in Figure 8.
The microstructural and analytical features observed in Figure 8 are as follows:
  • Particle structure and contrast: The cross-sectional surface appears heterogeneous, with various grains and inclusions. Some regions show bright contrast (likely indicative of phases rich in chromium, iron oxides, or other high-atomic-number components), while darker areas may correspond to more complex mixed-metal phases involving iron, magnesium, and other elements.
  • Particle size: The visible particle sizes range from several micrometers to tens of micrometers (estimated between 10–100 µm). This suggests that the sintering process caused the agglomeration of previously fine-grained mineral particles, such as chromium or iron oxides.
  • Mineral differentiation: Bright regions may represent concentrated phases, such as Cr- or Fe-rich oxides, formed during high-temperature treatment. On the other hand, less reactive or lower-temperature areas may contain incomplete or fewer crystalline structures.
Elemental distribution maps (Figure 9) indicate the presence of oxygen, silicon, sodium, magnesium, aluminum, and chromium as the main components.
The observed microstructure is typical for sintered materials undergoing chemical transformations intended to liberate valuable metals such as chromium. The presence of diverse grain morphologies and densities confirms a complex material matrix, potentially suitable for further chemical and thermal processing.
To study the reaction progression between the tailings and sodium additives—especially with respect to chromium behavior—four representative locations were selected from the polished cross-sections of the sintered samples (Figure 10):
  • Points 001 and 002: unreacted chromite cores, retained for baseline comparison.
  • Point 003: a partially reacted grain zone.
  • Point 004: a fully reacted area.
The results of the pointwise elemental analysis are presented in Appendix A, Appendix B, Appendix C and Appendix D, which include EDS spectra, tables of elemental mass concentrations, and a comparative diagram illustrating the behavior of key components at different reaction stages.
The EDS analysis (Figure 10, Appendix A) clearly reveals that point 001 corresponds to an unreacted residual of the original chromite grain. The phase is dominated by chromium- and magnesium-rich spinels, with inclusions of iron and aluminum. The particles’ core size is approximately 66 µm.
The high oxygen content confirms the oxide nature of the compound. The lack of sodium signal, particularly in the form of slag phases, indicates that the roasting reaction did not fully penetrate the center of the grain. This is typical of insufficient reaction time or an overly coarse particle size, which hinders complete transformation during solid-state roasting.
Thus, point 001 provides evidence of an unreacted chromite core, likely surrounded by reaction products—a characteristic feature of heterogeneous roasting processes. To enhance Cr2O3 recovery under such conditions, it is advisable to increase the roasting duration, reduce the particle size of the input material, or enhance flux reactivity by increasing the Na2CO3 dosage.
The analysis of point 002 (Figure 10, Appendix B) confirms results similar to point 001. It represents another unreacted chromite grain, retaining its original mineral structure. The size of the unreacted core at this point is approximately 100 µm, suggesting limited diffusion of sodium and incomplete phase transformation. This further reinforces the observation that particle size and reaction time are critical parameters in achieving full conversion during roasting.
Point 003 (Figure 10, Appendix C) is located in a bright grain region, typical of a reaction-altered zone that underwent significant thermochemical transformation. This is the area where active interaction between the tailings and Na2CO3 occurred.
The high oxygen content confirms a dominant oxide phase. The presence of a significant sodium signal indicates successful reaction with sodium carbonate. Compared to unreacted areas, the chromium content is markedly reduced (3.63 wt.%, 1.39 at.%), suggesting either chromium displacement from this phase as a result of alkali interaction, or its redistribution into other less-reactive or insoluble regions (e.g., unreacted chromite cores).
This is consistent with partial reaction and the formation of Na-rich intermediate phases. This region is enriched in Na, Si, and O, typical for glassy or amorphous sodium–silicate-type reaction products; additionally, it contains Al, suggesting partial incorporation or leaching of aluminum into soluble or semi-soluble forms; finally, it shows minimal Cr content, indicating that the Cr-bearing phases have fully decomposed or migrated into extractable forms.
Comparison of points 001–003:
  • Unreacted cores (points 001 and 002) retain high levels of Cr and Fe, indicating preservation of chromite structure;
  • Negligible Na content implies no interaction with sodium carbonate;
  • Structure is chemically inert and resistant to roasting under current conditions.
  • Partially reacted zone (point 003) exhibits the following features: significant increases in Na and O, characteristic of newly formed reaction products; substantial depletion in Cr, confirming effective disruption of Cr-bearing spinels; elevated Si and Al, suggesting the formation of sodium aluminosilicate phases.
According to the EDS data in Figure 10 (Appendix D), point 004 represents a region that has undergone complete chemical transformation. The grain lacks distinct boundaries and appears fully homogenized with the surrounding matrix. No apparent chromium peaks are detected, indicating that the original chromite mineral has been completely decomposed.
The resulting phase is an amorphous or weakly crystalline matrix, likely composed of sodium–aluminosilicate structures. This type of structure is a hallmark of successful alkaline activation, where stable phases such as CrFe2O₄ are broken down and converted into soluble or glassy products.
The absence of chromium and the dominance of Na, Si, and Al, along with minor traces of Mg and Fe, confirm the full completion of the reaction in this zone. Such transformation is essential for maximizing Cr2O3 extraction.
From the data in Table 3, the following conclusions can be drawn:
  • Point 004 is fully reacted, exhibiting high contents of Na, Si, and O; moreover, it has no detectable Cr, confirming complete chromium conversion into soluble compounds.
  • Point 003 is partially reacted; here, Cr is still present, but at a reduced level compared to the unreacted chromite, indicating partial extraction.
  • The unreacted cores (points 001 and 002) are characterized by high levels of Cr, Fe, Al, and Mg, signifying the preserved structure of the original chromite sludge.
The results demonstrate a clear elemental transformation pathway: a decrease in Cr and Al and an increase in Na and Si along the reaction front. These findings confirm the formation of sodium silicates and the effective leaching of chromium into the solution during roasting.
After roasting under optimal conditions and subsequent aqueous repulping at 80 °C, a solid residue (filter cake) was recovered. Its chemical composition (wt.%) is as follows: Na2O—15.1%; Cr2O3—0.245%; Fe2O3—9.624%; NiO—0.47%; Co3O₄—0.029%; ZnO—0.015%; MgO—45.9%; SiO2—22.9%; Al2O3—2.49%; TiO2—0.21%; ΣREE—0.026.
These values confirm that Cr2O3 was almost completely removed from the solid phase, while the residue remains enriched in magnesium and silicon, forming chemically stable, leach-resistant compounds.
The phase composition of the leaching residue was further confirmed by XRD and is presented in Figure 11.
X-ray diffraction analysis confirms that sodium chromate was successfully leached from the roasted material. The residue primarily consists of Na2Mg2Si2O7 and MgO, both of which are resistant to alkaline leaching. These phases are chemically stable and persist in the solid phase after treatment.
This leach residue can serve as a potential feedstock for the further recovery of magnesium, for instance through conversion into magnesium sulfate in downstream processing.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the optimal conditions for alkaline roasting of chromite beneficiation tailings (CBTs) from the Donskoy Mining and Processing Plant were determined using the Design of Experiments (DoE) methodology.
XRD analysis revealed that the untreated tailings consist predominantly of chemically resistant chromite and silicate phases. Roasting at 1000 °C, with Na2CO3 addition at 120–130 wt.% relative to the mass of the tailings, and a duration of 120 min, was found to be effective in breaking down the spinel structure and forming water-soluble Na2CrO4.
SEM-EPMA confirmed the progressive destruction of chromite grains, ranging from partially reacted to fully decomposed structures. The optimized process achieved Cr2O3 extraction efficiencies of up to 98% via aqueous leaching.
The solid residue consists mainly of Na2Mg2Si2O7 and MgO—compounds that are stable under alkaline conditions and can be considered as a secondary resource for the recovery of other valuable elements, such as magnesium, iron, aluminum, and others.
These results confirm the feasibility of the proposed technology for efficient chromium extraction from fine-grained industrial tailings and demonstrate the potential for integrated recovery of multiple metals from complex metallurgical waste.

Author Contributions

R.A.: project administration, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing; N.A.: writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing; S.G. and Y.A.: conceptualization, methodology, writing—review and editing; A.M.: conceptualization; B.S.: formal analysis and investigation, writing—review and editing; N.B.: formal analysis and investigation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research has been funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan under grant funding No. AP23489732.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Figure A1. Elemental composition at the core of the sintered particle (point 001).
Figure A1. Elemental composition at the core of the sintered particle (point 001).
Minerals 15 00555 g0a1aMinerals 15 00555 g0a1b

Appendix B

Figure A2. Elemental composition at the core of the sintered particle (point 002).
Figure A2. Elemental composition at the core of the sintered particle (point 002).
Minerals 15 00555 g0a2

Appendix C

Figure A3. Elemental composition of partially reacted zone (point 003).
Figure A3. Elemental composition of partially reacted zone (point 003).
Minerals 15 00555 g0a3

Appendix D

Figure A4. Elemental composition at the fully reacted grain (point 004).
Figure A4. Elemental composition at the fully reacted grain (point 004).
Minerals 15 00555 g0a4

References

  1. Freese, K.; Miller, R.B.; Cutright, T.; Senko, J.M. A Review of Chromite Ore Processing Residue (COPR). Curr. Environ. Eng. 2014, 1, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Du Preez, S.P.; van Kaam, T.P.M.; Ringdalen, E.; Pistorius, P.C. Ferrochrome Production Processes and Waste: A Review. Minerals 2023, 13, 809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, B.; Shi, P.; Jiang, M. Clean Hydrometallurgical Process for Chromite. Minerals 2016, 6, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Iblaminov, R. Geochemistry of Chromium Ore Genesis. Vestn. Perm. Univ. Geol. 2023, 22, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tastanov, Y.; Serzhanova, N.; Ultarakova, A.; Zhapalov, Y.; Egizbek, K.; Yermekbayev, N.; Badykova, A. Chrome-Containing Waste Recycling in Kazakhstan: Environmental and Technological Perspectives. Processes 2023, 11, 1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, M.; Mao, J.; Zhang, Z.; Li, L.; Long, T.; Chao, W. Current Supply Status, Demand Trends and Security Measures of Chromium Resources in China. Green Smart Min. Eng. 2024, 1, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bespaev, H.; Kenzhaliev, B.; Tastanov, Y. Mineralogical Classification of Chromite Ores from Kempirsai, Kazakhstan. Geol. Min. J. Kaz. 2020, 2, 53–61. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhakupov, A.; Tastanov, Y.; Abenov, T. Classification of Chromite Ore Based on Spinel Grain Size. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2022, 10, 49–57. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gladyshev, S.V.; Abdulvaliev, R.A.; Kenzhaliev, B.K.; Dyusenova, S.B.; Imangalieva, L.M. Development of a Technology for Producing Chromite Concentrate from Sludge Tailings. Kompleksnoe Ispol’zovanie Mineralnogo Syr’ya 2018, 1, 12–17. [Google Scholar]
  10. DonGOK Annual Report. Environmental and Mineralogical Status of Chrome Tailings; DonGOK: Aktobe, Kazakhstan, 2023; (Internal Industrial Publication). [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang, L.; Huang, H.; Zhu, Y. Sustainable Management of Chromium-Contaminated Wastes: A Case Study in China. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 331, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, M.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, Z.; Li, H.; Shan, F.; Ma, T. Anti-Stacking, Recyclable and Electron-Rich Fe3O4 Modified L-Glutamic Acid Functionalized Graphene Oxide towards Cr(VI) Removal by Adsorption-Reduction Behavior. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025, 363, 132090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhao, G.; Tian, C.; Wu, P.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Z.; Chen, X.; Xiong, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, J. Effect of Oxide Interactions on Chromium Speciation Transformation during Simulated Municipal Solid Waste Incineration. J. Environ. Sci. 2024, 142, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gao, Y.; Xia, J. Chromium Contamination Accident in China: Viewing Environment Policy of China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 8605–8606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, H.; Liu, C. Chromium Slag Leachability and Detoxification. Waste Manag. 2020, 105, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ostrovskii, S.V.; Starostin, A.G.; Basov, V.N.; Mikov, A.G. Study of the Leaching Process of Chromium from Chromate Production Sludges for Their Utilization and Detoxification. Vestn. Perm. Nats. Issled. Politekh. Univ. Khim. Tekhnol. Biotekhnol. 2016, 3, 75–90. [Google Scholar]
  17. Xu, H.-B.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Z.-H.; Zheng, S.-L.; Wang, Z.-K.; Qi, T.; Li, H.-Q. Development of a New Cleaner Production Process for Producing Chromic Oxide from Chromite Ore. J. Clean. Prod. 2005, 13, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhao, Y.; Hu, X.-M.; Jiang, B.-H.; Li, L. Optimization of the Operational Parameters for Desalination with Response Surface Methodology during a Capacitive Deionization Process. Desalination 2014, 336, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tinjum, J.M.; Benson, C.H.; Edil, T.B. Mobilization of Cr(VI) from Chromite Ore Processing Residue through Acid Treatment. Sci. Total Environ. 2008, 391, 13–25 . [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Burke, T.; Fagliano, J.; Goldoft, M.; Hazen, R.E.; Iglewicz, R.; McKee, T. Chromite Ore Processing Residue in Hudson County, New Jersey. Environ. Health Perspect. 1991, 92, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction pattern of CBTs showing dominant phases: chromite, chrysotile, and clinochlore.
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction pattern of CBTs showing dominant phases: chromite, chrysotile, and clinochlore.
Minerals 15 00555 g001
Figure 2. Diagnostic plots that confirm the statistical adequacy of the model: (a) normal plot of residuals; (b) residuals vs. predicted; (c) residuals vs. run; (d) predicted vs. actual.
Figure 2. Diagnostic plots that confirm the statistical adequacy of the model: (a) normal plot of residuals; (b) residuals vs. predicted; (c) residuals vs. run; (d) predicted vs. actual.
Minerals 15 00555 g002aMinerals 15 00555 g002b
Figure 3. Three-dimensional plots showing the interacting variables for Cr2O3 extraction: (a) interaction between temperature and amount of added Na2CO3; (b) contour diagram of the effect of temperature and amount of added Na2CO3.
Figure 3. Three-dimensional plots showing the interacting variables for Cr2O3 extraction: (a) interaction between temperature and amount of added Na2CO3; (b) contour diagram of the effect of temperature and amount of added Na2CO3.
Minerals 15 00555 g003
Figure 4. The effect of temperature and roasting duration on Cr2O3 extraction at a fixed Na2CO3 addition level of 115%: (a) interaction between temperature and duration; (b) contour diagram of the effect of temperature and duration.
Figure 4. The effect of temperature and roasting duration on Cr2O3 extraction at a fixed Na2CO3 addition level of 115%: (a) interaction between temperature and duration; (b) contour diagram of the effect of temperature and duration.
Minerals 15 00555 g004
Figure 5. The effect of Na2CO3 dosage and roasting duration on Cr2O3 extraction at a constant temperature of 925 °C: (a) interaction between duration and amount of added Na2CO3; (b) contour diagram of the effect of and duration and amount of added Na2CO3.
Figure 5. The effect of Na2CO3 dosage and roasting duration on Cr2O3 extraction at a constant temperature of 925 °C: (a) interaction between duration and amount of added Na2CO3; (b) contour diagram of the effect of and duration and amount of added Na2CO3.
Minerals 15 00555 g005
Figure 6. Briquettes before roasting (a) and the resulting sintered product after roasting (b).
Figure 6. Briquettes before roasting (a) and the resulting sintered product after roasting (b).
Minerals 15 00555 g006
Figure 7. X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the roasted product.
Figure 7. X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the roasted product.
Minerals 15 00555 g007
Figure 8. The microstructure of the roasted sample in SEM image (backscattered electron mode) at ×100 magnification.
Figure 8. The microstructure of the roasted sample in SEM image (backscattered electron mode) at ×100 magnification.
Minerals 15 00555 g008
Figure 9. Elemental distribution maps of roasted sample.
Figure 9. Elemental distribution maps of roasted sample.
Minerals 15 00555 g009
Figure 10. Polished cross-sections of the sintered samples: points 001 and 002—unreacted chromite cores, retained for baseline comparison; point 003—a partially reacted grain zone; point 004—a fully reacted area.
Figure 10. Polished cross-sections of the sintered samples: points 001 and 002—unreacted chromite cores, retained for baseline comparison; point 003—a partially reacted grain zone; point 004—a fully reacted area.
Minerals 15 00555 g010
Figure 11. XRD analysis of the leaching residue.
Figure 11. XRD analysis of the leaching residue.
Minerals 15 00555 g011
Table 1. Parameters and corresponding levels in optimization experiments.
Table 1. Parameters and corresponding levels in optimization experiments.
IDParametersRange
Variable parameters1Temperature 800–1000 °C
2The amount of added Na2CO350%–200%
3Reaction time30–120 min
Table 2. Data from DOE matrix.
Table 2. Data from DOE matrix.
RunsTemperature (°C)The Amount of Added Na2CO3Duration (min)Extraction of Cr2O3 (%)
18508012044.6
29001009042
385080906.1
410001009097.4
510001506092.6
69001009042
71000806094.3
8900809019.6
910008012098.6
1090010012082.3
11850150906.1
1210001006098.4
139001009042.4
1490015012081.1
15850806052.6
169001006041
17100015012098
1885015012036.8
198501506051.4
Table 3. Comparative summary of elemental composition at different reaction stages, as determined by EDS point analysis (Points 001–004).
Table 3. Comparative summary of elemental composition at different reaction stages, as determined by EDS point analysis (Points 001–004).
ElementContent, wt %
Fully Reacted GrainPartially Reacted ZoneUnreacted Cores
O46.0142.0536.13
Na20.4314.890.28
Mg8.086.1510.45
Al5.994.6512.45
Si12.9010.102.83
Fe6.029.1416.89
Cr03.6318.72
Ca0.580.951.49
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Akhmadiyeva, N.; Abdulvaliyev, R.; Gladyshev, S.; Sukurov, B.; Abikak, Y.; Manapova, A.; Bakhytuly, N. Optimizing Technological Parameters for Chromium Extraction from Chromite Ore Beneficiation Tailings. Minerals 2025, 15, 555. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15060555

AMA Style

Akhmadiyeva N, Abdulvaliyev R, Gladyshev S, Sukurov B, Abikak Y, Manapova A, Bakhytuly N. Optimizing Technological Parameters for Chromium Extraction from Chromite Ore Beneficiation Tailings. Minerals. 2025; 15(6):555. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15060555

Chicago/Turabian Style

Akhmadiyeva, Nazym, Rinat Abdulvaliyev, Sergey Gladyshev, Bulat Sukurov, Yerkezhan Abikak, Alfiyam Manapova, and Nauryzbek Bakhytuly. 2025. "Optimizing Technological Parameters for Chromium Extraction from Chromite Ore Beneficiation Tailings" Minerals 15, no. 6: 555. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15060555

APA Style

Akhmadiyeva, N., Abdulvaliyev, R., Gladyshev, S., Sukurov, B., Abikak, Y., Manapova, A., & Bakhytuly, N. (2025). Optimizing Technological Parameters for Chromium Extraction from Chromite Ore Beneficiation Tailings. Minerals, 15(6), 555. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15060555

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop