Next Article in Journal
Radioiodide Sorption on Natural and Acid-Treated Zeolite
Previous Article in Journal
The Application of Airborne Gamma-Ray Spectrometric Multi-Element Composite Parameters in the Prediction of Uranium Prospecting Areas in Qinling Region, China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Origin and Reservoir Significance of Authigenic Minerals in Lacustrine Shales: A Case Study from the Paleogene Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin, East China

1
School of Geoscience, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, China
2
College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
3
Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Shengli Oilfield, SINOPEC, Dongying 257022, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2025, 15(5), 493; https://doi.org/10.3390/min15050493
Submission received: 15 February 2025 / Revised: 25 April 2025 / Accepted: 3 May 2025 / Published: 7 May 2025

Abstract

:
Authigenic minerals in shale are products of the co-evolution of organic and inorganic components, affecting the heterogeneity of shale reservoirs. However, due to their fine granularity and complex rock composition, studies on these minerals in shale are still insufficient. This research focuses on the lacustrine shales from the upper sub-member of the fourth member in the Eocene Shahejie Formation, Dongying Sag, East China. Utilizing core samples, thin sections, scanning electron microscope, X-ray diffraction, elemental geochemistry, and organic geochemistry, we systematically characterized the features and origins of authigenic minerals. The results identified several typical authigenic minerals, including authigenic quartz, framboidal and euhedral pyrite, ferroan dolomite, kaolinite, chlorite, and albite. Authigenic quartz is predominantly diagenetic silica formed through smectite illitization, acidic dissolution of K-feldspar, and alkaline dissolution of detrital quartz. Pyrite is a product of microbial sulfate reduction, with framboidal pyrite forming during an early diagenetic stage under conditions with sufficient solute supply and euhedral pyrite forming during a later stage under conditions with insufficient solute supply. Ferroan dolomite originates from the precipitation of Fe and Mg during smectite illitization, with slight contributions from the acidic dissolution of chlorite and calcite. Kaolinite stems from the acidic dissolution of K-feldspar, while chlorite results from the transformation of kaolinite. Albite primarily arises from the alkaline alteration of anorthite and K-feldspar. Most non-clay authigenic minerals likely enhance reservoir quality by slightly reducing the effects of compaction, whereas authigenic clay minerals typically exert detrimental effects on reservoir properties. This study constrains the genesis of authigenic minerals to assess their influence on reservoir quality in lacustrine shale.

1. Introduction

Research on the diagenesis of clastic rocks has evolved over the past few decades from early qualitative observations to quantitative modeling, detailed predictions, and assessments of reservoirs [1,2,3,4,5,6]. This shift has significantly advanced the exploration of oil basins into more sophisticated domains [7,8]. Compared to clastic rocks and carbonate, organic-rich shales display similar detrital and authigenic minerals, but they are characterized by finer grain sizes, diverse compositions, and coexistence with organic matter [9,10,11,12]. Shale diagenesis is governed by both external controls (e.g., tectonic activity, depositional environment, burial history) and internal factors (e.g., lithofacies heterogeneity, organic matter composition and abundance, thermal maturity) [13,14,15,16,17]. The interplay between organic and inorganic diagenetic processes drives the formation of authigenic mineral assemblages, including microquartz, pyrite, sparry calcite, albite, clay minerals, and zeolites, which fundamentally shape reservoir properties [18,19,20]. Systematic analysis of these minerals provides key insights into microscale diagenetic systems and their control on the development of fine-grained reservoirs [6,14,21,22,23,24,25].
Extensive research has focused on diagenesis in organic-rich shales and its contributions to reservoir quality; however, relatively less attention has been paid to authigenic minerals formed during burial, despite their non-negligible impact on reservoir properties [26,27,28,29,30]. The formation of authigenic minerals is fundamentally controlled by diagenetic fluids. In the relatively closed diagenetic system of shale, the diagenetic fluids are primarily composed of connate sedimentary water, hydrocarbons, and acidic fluids released during the thermal maturation of organic matter, as well as interlayer water released during mineral transformation [9,11,31,32]. Early diagenetic processes in organic-rich shales are largely influenced by inherited primary sedimentary water, which has abundant bicarbonate ions, reduced manganese and iron, and sulfide [33,34,35]. They can be cemented into early diagenetic minerals such as calcite, pyrite, siderite, and dolomite [36,37,38,39]. During shallow burial, hydrocarbons are metabolized by biological processes and redox reactions, such as those involving methanogenic bacteria [40,41,42]. Key decomposed products of these reactions include phenols, amino acids, and fatty acids [31,43,44]. When thermal maturities greater than Ro~0.5% are reached, hydrocarbon molecules, organic acids, H2O, CO2, and N2 within OM are released and have been described extensively as a mechanism for acidizing diagenetic systems [10,45,46,47,48]. Additionally, the dehydration of minerals such as clays and gypsum also affects the properties of diagenetic fluids [49,50,51]. Therefore, the complex diagenetic environment driven by these varying fluids highlights the inherent difficulties in resolving the complex origins of authigenic minerals in organic-rich shale successions [52,53], and these minerals are considered of significant importance for the reservoir quality of shales in many published studies [17,28,54]. Previous studies have mainly focused on authigenic minerals within marine shale, especially biogenic microquartz crystals, which generate abundant intercrystalline pores and are considered as critical factors enabling efficient shale gas production in both academia and industry [15,17,24,47]. However, related studies reported in lacustrine shales are limited. The complex petrology and fine grain size of lacustrine shales enhance the reactivity of their components, resulting in unique morphologies and distributions of authigenic minerals. These characteristics may lead to implications in reservoirs that are significantly different from those observed in marine shales.
The upper sub-member of the fourth member of the Eocene Shahejie Formation (Es4U) in the Dongying Sag of Bohai Bay Basin, China, is a typical saline lacustrine organic-rich shale succession and an important unconventional target [55,56]. This interval offers an excellent sample set to investigate the origin and diagenetic evolution of authigenic minerals and their impact on reservoir quality in lacustrine shales. This study focuses on detailed observations of core samples, thin sections, and scanning electron microscope (SEM + EDS), as well as quantitative analyses including X-ray diffraction (XRD), major and trace element analysis, total organic carbon (TOC) measurement, rock pyrolysis, and porosity analysis. The aim is to (i) decipher the formation mechanisms of authigenic minerals, (ii) reconstruct their evolutionary sequence, and (iii) assess their impact on lacustrine shale reservoirs. The findings are critical for reservoir quality evaluation and development optimization.

2. Geological Setting

The Dongying Depression is in the southeastern part of the Bohai Bay Basin, located in eastern China (Figure 1A), which is a typical half-graben rift basin (Figure 1B). The Dongying depression can be subdivided into seven secondary structural units, including the Minfeng Subsag, the Lijin Subsag, the Niuzhuang Subsag, the Boxing Subsag, the Southern Gentle Slope Zone, the Central Anticline Zone, and the Northern Steep Slope Zone, with an area of approximately 5700 km2 (Figure 1C) [57]. The Paleogene strata within the study area are widely distributed and consist, from the bottom up, of the Kongdian Formation, the Shahejie Formation, and the Dongying Formation. The Shahejie Formation can be further divided into the fourth member (Es4), the third member (Es3), the second member (Es2), and the first member (Es1) [58,59]. The Es4 is further divided into the Es4U and Es4L (Figure 1D). The Es4L primarily consists of mudstone, gypsum, coarse sandstone, and carbonate rock, while the Es4U is mainly composed of calcareous shale and dolomitic shale [58].
According to previous research, the Dongying Depression quickly subsided with a large-scale lake expansion, reaching a maximum during the Es4U. The saline, lacustrine, black organic-rich shale succession formed at the lake bottom (~50 m), which are the primary source rocks for the petroliferous depression [60,61]. The water salinity varied from semi-saline to saline within our target layer [62].

3. Samples and Experimental Methods

In total, 136 samples from the NX124 well (3213 to 3243.15 m), FY1 well (3248 to 3430 m), F120 well (3269.5 to 3289 m), and F143 well (3110 to 3141.08 m) were selected to analyze the genesis of authigenic minerals in organic-rich shale. The methods used included X-ray diffraction (XRD), total organic carbon content (TOC) measurement, rock pyrolysis, vitrinite reflectance (Ro) analysis, major and trace element analysis, sporopollen analysis, scanning electron microscopy (SEM + EDS), and helium porosity testing. These samples were obtained from China’s SINOPEC Shengli Oilfield Company and divided into bulk and cylindrical samples. The experiments were conducted in the Reservoir Geology and Basin Analysis Key Laboratory of the China University of Petroleum.

3.1. Petrographic Analysis

We selected 94 bulk samples from the FY1 well and 12 samples from the NX124 well for bulk-rock XRD analysis. First, we ground to powders of less than 300 mesh in size. The X’Pert PRO MPD with CuK α radiation (60 kV, 55 mA) and Ni filtering were used for X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses to identify the bulk mineralogical composition. X-ray diffraction analysis was performed over a 2θ range of 1–160°, with mineral identification and semi-quantitative analysis based on characteristic peak intensities and positions. Subsequently, 43 samples from the FY1 well were separated for clay XRD. The samples were prepared as oriented mounts and subjected to ethylene glycol vapor treatment under 40–50 °C conditions without employing zincite (or similar) internal standards for quantitative calibration.
Thirty samples from the FY1 well were adhered to a standard glass slide with epoxy resin to analyze mineral and sporopollen characterization using a Leica DM2700P high-precision microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany).

3.2. Organic Geochemistry Analysis

The total organic carbon (TOC) contents of 102 bulk samples from the FY1 well and NX124 well were ground to powders of less than 200 mesh in size and treated with 12.5% hydrochloric acid to remove inorganic carbon. After rinsing with deionized water, the samples were filtered to achieve neutrality and dried in an oven at 60–80 °C. Finally, samples were analyzed using a Leco CS-744 carbon-sulfur analyzer with high-temperature oxygen flow combustion.
Rock pyrolysis was performed on 102 bulk samples from the FY1 well and NX124 well. The samples were ground to powders that were 200 mesh in size and placed in the Rock-Eval 6 analyzer. Then, samples were heated isothermally at 300 °C for three minutes to measure the free hydrocarbon content (S1) released from the rock. Following this, the temperature was increased at a rate of 25 °C/min to 600 °C to obtain the pyrolyzed hydrocarbon content (S2) generated from the thermal maturity of organic matter and to determine the temperature at which the maximum S2 yield occurs (Tmax). The hydrogen index (HI) was calculated using the ratio of S2 to TOC. The mixture was heated on a low-temperature hot plate at 140 °C for 48 h.
In addition, 22 samples from the FY1 well were separated for vitrinite reflectance to determine the diagenetic stage.

3.3. Inorganic Geochemistry Analysis

For major and trace element analysis, 12 samples from the NX124 well were ground to approximately 200 mesh. Then, about a 0.05 g sample was placed into a PTFE crucible with 25 mL of water, followed by the addition of 1 mL hydrochloric acid, 1 mL nitric acid, 2 mL hydrofluoric acid, and 0.5 mL perchloric acid. After evaporation to near dryness, 2 mL of a 1:1 nitric acid solution was added, and the sample was transferred to a 50 mL volumetric flask. The sample was then analyzed using an ELEMENT XR high-resolution inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

3.4. SEM and EDS

The scanning electron microscope (SEM) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) analyses were performed on 12 samples selected from the NX124 well. The samples were first cut into slices with a diameter of approximately 1–3 cm and a thickness of about 0.2–1 cm. Then, 12 samples underwent mechanical and Ar-ion polishing to generate super-flat surfaces suitable for SEM examination. Subsequently, a thin layer of carbon film (approximately a few nanometers thick) was uniformly deposited on the sample surfaces. The Zeiss Crossbeam 550 FIB-SEM analyzer equipped with an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) was used as the observation instrument. In addition, 30 SEM samples from the FY1, F120, and F143 wells were analyzed, including Ar-polished images and fresh fracture surfaces images.

3.5. Helium Porosity

The helium porosity of 21 samples from the FY1 well and NX124 well was determined using the KXD-III helium porosity determinator to measure the porosity. Samples were prepared as cylinders with a diameter of 2.5 cm and height of 3 cm. To make helium fully fill the pores in the shale, the working pressure and equilibration time of the helium pycnometry test were 4 MPa for 8 min, respectively. Porosity was obtained from the difference between the bulk density and the skeletal density with a helium expansion method using Boyle’s Law helium porosimetry [44].

4. Results

4.1. Petrologic Features and Lithofacies Types

The mineral composition of shale, as shown in Table S1, is diverse in the study area (Figure 2A). The calcite content is the highest, ranging from 1% to 80%, with an average of 39.95%. Quartz content varies from 4% to 55%, averaging 24.52%. Clay minerals range from 3% to 54%, with an average of 16.85%, primarily consisting of illite (average of 86.81%), followed by mixed layers of illite-smectite (average of 12.95%) (Figure 2B). Dolomite content ranges from 1% to 93%, with an average of 11.65%. The contents of plagioclase and pyrite are relatively low, averaging below 5%. The sporopollen identification shows that its color is light yellow to black.
The Es4U is primarily characterized by calcareous shale, mixed shale, and dolomitic mudstone. Calcareous shale and mixed shale predominantly exhibit a well-lamellar texture, with thin sections revealing three-part laminations of bright carbonate laminae, brown felsic laminae, and dark organo-clay laminae. In contrast, dolomitic mudstone primarily exhibits a massive texture (Figure 2C).

4.2. Geochemical Characteristics

4.2.1. Organic Geochemistry

Organic geochemical data indicate that the TOC values of samples from Es4U range from 0.55% to 9.05%, with an average of 2.27% (Table S2). Among these, 99.02% of the samples have values greater than 1%, and 51.96% have values greater than 2%. The S1 values range from 0.34 to 5.8 mg/g, with an average of 2.28 mg/g (Figure 3A), while S2 values range from 0.93 to 41.08 mg/g, averaging 7.49 mg/g (Figure 3B). The oil saturation index (OSI) can be used to characterize the mobility efficiency of retained hydrocarbons in shale reservoirs [63]. When the OSI exceeds 100, hydrocarbons exceeding the adsorption capacity of the organic matter will exhibit better mobility and oil production potential [19,64]. The OSI values of samples range from 28.82 to 377.52 mg/g, with an average of 107.86 mg/g, indicating that the Es4U shale has good oil potential. The Tmax values range from 431 to 461 °C, with an average of 448.04 °C. The HI values range from 129.17 to 544.69 mg/g, averaging 319.66 mg/g. According to the cross plot of Tmax and HI (Figure 3C), the OM is primarily comprised of type I and minor type II. The measured vitrinite reflectance (Ro) values of 22 samples range from 0.52% to 0.93%, indicating a thermal maturity stage spanning from low maturity to the oil window (Table S3).

4.2.2. Elemental Geochemistry

The major element of samples is shown in Table S4. The most abundant element is SiO2, with a content ranging from 27.4% to 50.2% and an average of 37.76%. The next most abundant elements are CaO and Al2O3, with average contents of 18.26% and 10.43%, respectively. The contents of Fe2O3, MgO, and K2O range from 1% to 5%, while Na2O is approximately 1%. The contents of TiO2, P2O5, and MnO are generally below 1%.
The trace elements of samples are shown in Table S5. The most abundant trace elements are Sr and Ba, with average concentrations of 1985.58 ppm and 692.25 ppm, respectively. Following these are Li, B, V, Cr, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Ga, Rb, Y, and Zr, which have concentrations ranging from 10 to 100 ppm. Be, Sc, As, Nb, Mo, Cd, and Cs have the lowest concentrations, generally falling below 10 ppm.

4.3. Types and Characteristics of Authigenic Minerals

4.3.1. Characteristics of Authigenic Quartz

Authigenic quartz widely appears in forms with short columnar and hexagonal columnar clay-size euhedral microquartz, primarily developing within intergranular pores and adjacent to calcite and illite (Figure 4A).

4.3.2. Characteristics of Pyrite

Two distinct pyrite morphologies dominate the shale samples. Framboidal aggregates are composed of closely packed, submicron equigranular crystals, forming elliptical clusters (Figure 4B). Euhedral pyrites often appear as discrete crystals with cubic and occasionally elliptical morphologies, with the grain sizes ranging from 1 to 5 μm (Figure 4C). The pyrite concentrations in shales range from 0% to 34%, with an average of 2.84%.

4.3.3. Characteristics of Ferroan Dolomite

The ferroan dolomite is in the form of micron-sized euhedral crystals, which are comprised of an irregular core of dolomite and an annular rim of ankerite. Ferroan dolomite is commonly observed within clays, with grain size ranging from 2 to 20 μm (Figure 4D). The crystal surfaces are flat and not curved, exhibiting a relatively complete rhombohedral shape.

4.3.4. Characteristics of Authigenic Clay Minerals

The authigenic clays are primarily comprised of kaolinite and chlorite. The kaolinite appears in book-like and leaf-like shapes, often accompanied by microquartz and dissolution of K-feldspar (Figure 4E,F). Chlorite usually appears in hairy and fibrous filaments (Figure 4G,H). The content of kaolinite and chlorite is limited, occurring only at specific depths (Figure 2B).

4.3.5. Characteristics of Albite

The albite is primarily in the form of small granular and columnar euhedral crystals, with grain sizes ranging from 5 to 10 μm. The albite is commonly observed filling the intergranular pore in association with dissolved K-feldspar and illite (Figure 4I). Compared to other feldspar, the albite was characterized by weak dissolution with no evidence of replacement or cementation by other minerals.

4.4. Porosity Characteristics

Twenty-one samples revealed the porosity characteristics of the Es4U shale, as shown in Table S1. The porosity varies greatly in different wells. Among them, nine samples from the FY1 well showed porosity ranging from 2.65 to 9.43%, with an average of 6.13%. Twelve samples from the NX124 well showed porosity ranging from 7.37 to 15.6%, with an average of 11.25%. Both of them can be classified as low porosity reservoirs.

4.5. Diagenetic Stage

This study used Ro, Tmax, clay mineral types and assemblages, authigenic mineral types, pore types, and sporopollen color as primary indices for classifying the diagenetic stage [65,66,67]. The Ro ranges from 0.52% to 0.93%, and Tmax ranges from 415 to 451 °C, indicating that the maturity of shales is in the low-mature to mature stage. The clay minerals are composed of illite and illite-smectite mixed layers, with the ratio of the illite-smectite mixed layer being 20%, suggesting an ordered mixed layer. The sparry calcite and ferroan dolomite with bright rims are widely observed, and pore types are mainly classified as dissolved pores and recrystallized intergranular pores in samples. The sporopollen color ranges from light yellow to black. Therefore, we conclude that the Es4U shale corresponds to the mesodiagenetic A stage (Table 1).

5. Discussion

5.1. The Origin of Authigenic Minerals

5.1.1. The Origin of Authigenic Quartz

The extensively exposed continuous deep-water mudstone sequences lack definitive petrological evidence for active hydrothermal or volcanic activity in the study area [60,61]. Hydrothermal authigenic quartz typically occurs as coarse-grained anhedral crystals or vein fillings [68]. However, SEM imaging reveals euhedral, clay-sized microquartz crystals spatially associated with clay minerals (e.g., kaolinite, illite) and dissolved K-feldspar (Figure 5A,B), indicating silica release linked to smectite illitization and acidic dissolution of K-feldspar. Additionally, quartz grains adjacent to pyrite and illite exhibit dissolution features (irregular shapes, diffuse boundaries) (Figure 5C,D) consistent with alkaline-mediated dissolution of detrital quartz precursor [69]. The study area represents a saline lacustrine basin with strongly alkaline conditions (Figure 6), where detrital quartz grains are susceptible to dissolution.
Following the principle of mass balance, various silicon components can be quantitatively determined using major element analysis combined with XRD data [70,71]. The calculation of detrital silica (Sidet) is given by the formula Sidet = Alsample ∗ (Si/Al)background, where (Si/Al)background is the ratio between Si and Al in the background detrital flux, which is approximately 3.11 [72]. Additionally, a shale containing 787.2 g illite can generate 197.7 g SiO2 during the smectite illitization [70]. Therefore, the silica released from the smectite illitization (Siclay) can be calculated. Finally, the remaining excess silica (Siexcess) can be calculated using the formula (Si/Al)total − 3.11/(Si/Al)total [71]. The results are shown in Table 2. The content of Sidet ranges from 21.46% to 50.07%, Siclay ranges from 2.89 to 10.26, and Siexcess ranges from 0 to 0.38. The calculated Sitotal shows a good correlation with measured Si, and their values are relatively close (Figure 7A). The lacustrine shales in our study area show no direct evidence (e.g., sponge spicules or radiolarians) of biogenic silica. However, given documented occurrences of silica fauna in lacustrine shale [73], a biogenic silica component cannot be entirely excluded. The SiO2-Zr correlation serves as a reliable proxy for silica provenance, where positive correlation reflects terrigenous input and negative correlation implies biogenic sources [73]. Our geochemical data reveal strong Zr correlations with Sidet and Siclay (confirming terrigenous derivation), contrasted by a clear negative Zr-Siexcess relationship (pointing to potential biogenic contributions) (Figure 7B). Biogenic silica, if present at all, constitutes a volumetrically negligible component (<0.1%) of the total authigenic quartz inventory, with terrigenous sources and diagenetic transformations dominating the silica inventory.

5.1.2. The Origin of Pyrite

Pyrites predominantly appear in samples as framboidal and euhedral pyrites, which are often observed in other marine and lacustrine organic-rich shale successions [14,28,72,74]. According to the cross plot of grain size distribution and standard deviation, pyrites in samples have a grain size of less than 5 μm (Figure 8), primarily forming in a sulfurized environment [75]. The supply of S was derived from bacterial sulfate reduction (MSR) with shallow burial and thermochemical sulfate reduction (TSR) with deep burial. These processes were controlled by the openness of the diagenetic system, solute supply, and temperature and pressure conditions [76,77]. Framboidal pyrites primarily form during the syngenetic or early diagenetic stages [78], which have a strong sulfidic environment and a relatively open diagenetic system. Abundant Fe2+ and HS allow pyrite microparticles to rapidly nucleate, grow, and aggregate, forming an equigranular structure [74,75,79]. Euhedral pyrites form in two stages: (i) directly precipitated from unsaturated solutions of Fe and S during the syngenetic stage [80] and (ii) crystal aggregation and growth of framboidal pyrites during the early stage [38,81]. These origins emphasize that the solute supply in unsaturated fluids is limited, primarily formed by crystal overgrowth [82]. A third formation pathway involves pyrite generation via thermochemical sulfate reduction (TSR) after the mesodiagenetic stage [83]. However, TSR requires higher temperatures and typically occurs after mesodiagenesis [77,83]. The shale of Es4U is in the mesodiagenetic A stage, which may not exhibit the temperature and pressure conditions required for this reaction.

5.1.3. The Origin of Ferroan Dolomite

Dolomite is difficult to directly form at normal temperatures. Previous studies indicate that the minimum temperature required for dolomite precipitation in the laboratory is approximately 50–60 °C [84,85]. However, microbial mediation can overcome limitations that dolomite can directly precipitate at room temperature [86,87]. Analogous studies have been reported in the global Precambrian sedimentary rock record [88,89,90,91]. Ferroan dolomite is generally considered a product of hydrothermalism and burial dolomitization [92,93]. Hydrothermal ferroan dolomite exhibits coarse grain with a saddle texture and an obvious bright rim, with higher Fe contents usually exceeding 50% [94,95,96]. However, observations in samples indicate that ferroan dolomite crystals exhibit fine grains with indistinct bright rims and Fe content that is lower than 15% (Figure 9); thus, it is unlikely to be of hydrothermal origin. Therefore, it is more likely that the ferroan dolomite in samples is primarily a product of burial dolomitization. The Mg2+ and Fe2+ released from the smectite illitization may serve as the major source of ferroan dolomite [97]:
4.5 K + + 8 Al 3 + + Smectite Illite + Na + + 2 Ca 2 + + 2.5 Fe 3 + + 2 Mg 2 + + 3 Si 4 +
Calcite + Fe 2 + + Mg 2 + Ferroan   dolomite
The cross plot of the dolomite content versus values of Mg + Fe reveals a significant positive correlation (Figure 10A), indicating that dolomite is in the main form of ferroan dolomite. There is also a positive correlation between Mg2+ and Fe2+ (Figure 10B), suggesting that their sources and enrichment characteristics are likely similar. Additionally, the positive correlation between K and the values of Fe + Mg also indicates a related origin of these ions (Figure 10C). The K-rich diagenetic system is in favor of the smectite illitization that promotes the release of Fe2+ and Mg2+ as well as the precipitation of ferroan dolomite [98,99]. This is obviously observed in samples where ferroan dolomite is widely distributed within clays.
Additionally, the dissolution of calcite and chlorite driven by CO2 can induce precipitation of ferroan dolomite:
Chlorite + 5 CaCO 3 + 5 CO 2 Ferroan   dolomite + Kaolinite + SiO 2 + 2 H 2 O
In relatively closed diagenetic systems of shale, CO2 is related to hydrocarbon generation [100]. The dissolution of chlorite releases Mg2+ and Fe2+, contributing to the precipitation of ferroan dolomite [101]. Stronger dissolution of chlorite results in increased ferroan dolomite [102], with the reaction being influenced by temperature and pH. The optimal temperature range for this reaction is between 100 °C and 140 °C, and suitable pH conditions are neutral to acidic [103]. Burial temperature can be calculated using vitrinite reflectance (Ro):
T = ( In ( Ro % ) + 1.26 ) / 0.0081
The values of Ro range from 0.52% to 0.93%, corresponding to calculated temperatures between 120.49 °C and 151.66 °C, which partially fall within the optimal temperature range for this reaction. The cross plot of the calcite and ferroan dolomite reveals an obvious negative correlation (Figure 10D), indicating that the above process probably occurs in diagenetic history. However, the dissolution of chlorite is a slow process [104], and its content is relatively low (Figure 2B). The amount of ferroan dolomite formed through this process may be limited.

5.1.4. The Origin of Clay Minerals

Clay minerals in sedimentary basins primarily originate from terrestrial input and diagenetic alteration [98,105,106]. Illite-smectite mixed layers and illite have extremely high content (Figure 2B), closely related to alkaline connate waters [12,107,108]. Smectite rapidly transforms into illite with burial. Therefore, the precursor of current illite-smectite mixed layers and illite is early smectite. Kaolinite is a product of alteration of K-feldspar grains, which originate from thermodynamic reactions of feldspar dissolution and reprecipitation and are stable in an acidic diagenetic system [98,109].
2 K-feldspar + 2 H + + H 2 O Kaolinite + 4 SiO 2 + 2 K +
2 Albite + 2 H + + H 2 O Kaolinite + 4 SiO 2 + 2 Na +
Anorthite + 2 H + + H 2 O Kaolinite + Ca 2 +
Photomicrographs revealed that kaolinite exhibits a booklet shape that grows with microquartz, and obvious dissolved K-feldspar with microquartz was observed in the sample (Figure 5B). The cross plot of kaolinite and feldspar reveals a negative correlation (Figure 11A), further suggesting that the development of kaolinite is primarily related to the acidic dissolution of K-feldspar.
Chlorite fibers are primarily products of kaolinite chloritization. Diagenetic fluids change and enrich Mg2+ through dissolved dolomite and smectite illitization in mesodiagenesis, triggering the kaolinite chloritization [110]. The cross plot of kaolinite and chlorite indicates a negative correlation (Figure 11B), suggesting the growth of chlorite as dissolution of kaolinite. Photomicrographs reveal that chlorite exhibits hairy and fibrous crystals (Figure 4G,H), indicating its diagenetic origin.

5.1.5. The Origin of Albite

Albite in shales has various origins. The occurrence of volcanic and hydrothermal albite in organic-rich lacustrine shales from the Permian Lucaogou Formation has been well documented [68,111]. However, there is not an obvious volcanic and hydrothermal filling record in Es4U shale. SEM observations indicate that albites exhibit well-euhedral crystals with fine-grain size, widely occurring with calcite and illite (Figure 4I). These are interpreted as alkaline alteration products of feldspar [25,69].
Anorthite + 2 Na + + 4 SiO 2 = 2 NaAlSi 3 O 8 + Ca 2 +
2 K-feldspar + 2.5 kaolinite + 2 Na + + 4 SiO 2 = 2 albite + 2 illite   + 5 H 2 O + 2 H +
The alkaline alteration of K-feldspar and anorthite requires a sufficient supply of SiO2 and Na+. This process works synergistically with the reaction in Equation (1), where the release of Si4+ and Na+ from smectite illitization promotes the alkaline alteration of K-feldspar and anorthite. The cross plot of Na+ versus Fe2+ and Mg2+ indicates a positive correlation (Figure 12A), suggesting that Na, Fe, and Mg may all originate from the smectite illitization. The content of K-feldspar is very low and predominantly features plagioclase in shales (Table S1), which have a strong positive correlation with Na+ (Figure 12B). SEM observations reveal that albite is the only observable plagioclase phase in samples (Figure 13). However, feldspar from terrestrial input is unlikely to consist entirely of albite. It is concluded that albite primarily originates from the alkaline alteration of K-feldspar and anorthite.

5.2. The Diagenetic Evolution Sequence of Authigenic Minerals

Organic-rich shale has undergone a lengthy and complex process of organic and inorganic diagenesis, which is in the stage of mesodiagenesis A (Table 1). Based on the morphology, mineral assemblage, and diagenetic features of authigenic minerals, their diagenetic evolution sequence has been established (Figure 14).
During the syngenetic diagenesis stage, clay-rich sediments are rich in connate sedimentary water, with primary porosity reaching up to 70% [112], indicating an open diagenetic system. The diagenetic fluid consists of inherited alkaline primary sedimentary water. Due to the abundance of solutes, particularly S and Fe, framboidal pyrite preferentially precipitates [74,79]. The framboidal pyrite crystals were uniform in size and distributed closely, indicating a relatively open diagenetic system.
In the eodiagenetic A stage, the paleotemperature is less than 65 °C, and Ro is below 0.35%. Calcareous sediments rapidly dewater under the compaction, leading to the closure of the diagenetic system. As the abundance of S and Fe solutes decreases, the formation of framboidal pyrite becomes difficult, and precipitation in the form of euhedral pyrite is noted [32]. The euhedral pyrite crystals were of nonuniform sizes, and their distribution was controlled by pores, indicating a relatively closed diagenetic system. Felsic grains dissolve in an alkaline environment, with ions such as Si4+, K+, Na+, and Ca2+ transferring into the diagenetic fluids.
In the eodiagenetic B stage, the paleotemperature ranges from 65 to 85 °C, and Ro ranges from 0.35 to 0.5%. Here, mechanical compaction is the primary factor leading to a closed diagenetic system [4,11]. More ions are released by smectite illitization, such as Si4+, Mg2+, Na+, Ca2+, and Fe2+, into diagenetic fluids [98,113]. The synergistic effect of smectite illitization that continuously consumes K+, as well as alkaline alteration of feldspar that continuously consumes Na+, leads to a significant decrease in K-feldspar and anorthite, with an increasing number of albites. Ca2+, Mg2+, and Fe2+ of diagenetic fluids will precipitate as ferroan dolomite. When the temperature was about 70 °C, a few organic acids were released by the hydrocarbon generation of organic matter, which acidized the diagenetic environment [45,114]. Any silica precipitated from diagenetic fluids typically forms as microquartz.
In the mesodiagenetic A stage, the paleotemperature ranges from 85 to 140 °C, and Ro ranges from 0.5 to 1.3%. The organic acids and CO2 released by organic matter acidize the diagenetic system, which dissolves feldspar and carbonate minerals [115,116]. Dissolved K-feldspar was accompanied by microquartz and kaolinite precipitate in pores, while the release of K+ promotes smectite illitization [46,117] and further precipitates as ferroan dolomite [93,99]. Additionally, the Mg2+ enriched in diagenetic fluid results from smectite illitization and the dissolution of dolomite, resulting in kaolinite chloritization [103,110]. Small amounts of chlorite and calcite dissolve and precipitate as kaolinite and ferroan dolomite [102,104].

5.3. Implications for Shale Reservoir Quality

Authigenic minerals in shales exhibit complex organic and inorganic interactions that critically influence reservoir quality. The cross plot of diagenetic silica, ferroan dolomite, albite, and pyrite versus porosity shows a relatively positive correlation (Figure 15A–D), suggesting that these minerals have significant implications for shale reservoirs. Although they filled most of the pores, they exhibit important clues for understanding the mechanisms that preserve pores during burial. Beyond overpressure, grain support frameworks constitute the dominant mechanism preserving open intergranular pores throughout shale diagenesis [10,14,118]. Unlike in marine shales where authigenic quartz contributes to pore development [24,38,119], lacustrine authigenic quartz primarily enhances reservoir quality through improved brittleness rather than porosity creation (Figure 4A). While framboidal pyrite develops intercrystalline pores that enhance porosity (Figure 4B), euhedral pyrite promotes hydrocarbon cracking through surface iron ions despite its inability to form pores [100,120]. In some well-documented studies, dolomite, rather than calcite, dominates dissolution within shale reservoirs [118,121]. However, the specific mechanisms are not yet comprehensively understood. A possible explanation was that Mg and Fe incorporation changed the free energy within the crystal and enhanced mineral solubility [122,123,124]. Thus, the dissolution of dolomite may generate more porosity rather than the dissolution of calcite during burial, although dolomite is less common than calcite. Theoretically, alkaline alteration of K-feldspar and anorthite can generate porosity values of 15.4% and 6.92%, respectively [125]. It looks favorable, but the actual content of feldspar is low. Calcites, dolomites, and microquartz crystals are the dominant non-clay minerals in organic-rich shales [34,63,126]. Feldspar grains are chemically unstable and undergo dissolution, forming dissolved pores during deep burial [127]. Based on the photomicrographs, however, dissolved pores are not well-developed in albite (Figure 4I and Figure 14). This process is associated with an increased concentration of Na+ within diagenetic fluids, which in turn leads to albite precipitation but not dissolution [128]. Nevertheless, albites still have the potential to enhance the mechanical strength of rock and preserve porosity. As products of diagenetic alteration, authigenic clay minerals degrade pore structure and intensify pore throat heterogeneity [129,130] (Figure 15E,F), but they may contribute to hydrocarbon adsorption and enrichment [48,131].
This study seeks to decode the origin and diagenetic evolution of authigenic minerals in lacustrine shale to evaluate their implications on reservoir quality. However, the number of samples (12) is insufficient to accurately illustrate the complexity and heterogeneity of authigenic minerals in microscale diagenetic systems. Moreover, the methods used are rather conventional. Considerably more sample sets and high-resolution tests are required for a comprehensive understanding of the multiple origins of authigenic minerals. In particular, in-situ high-resolution crystallographic, mineralogical, and element geochemical data are needed to allow for more precise correlations of nucleation, growth, and dissolution of authigenic minerals across the diagenetic history.

6. Conclusions

This study systematically investigates the formation mechanisms of authigenic minerals in lacustrine organic-rich shales and their multiscale impacts on reservoir quality.
1. Authigenic minerals in lacustrine organic-rich shale are dominated by microquartz, framboidal and euhedral pyrites, ferroan dolomite, kaolinite, chlorite, and albite. These authigenic minerals mostly display submicron-sized euhedral crystals and are distributed in large pores.
2. Euxinic and saline primary sedimentary water dominated the type and abundance of early diagenetic authigenic minerals. Framboidal pyrites precipitated directly from solutions with high sulfur saturation. When the sulfur saturation decreased, framboidal pyrites could further grow and transform into euhedral pyrites. Persistent alkaline alteration of feldspar could be an important mechanism for albite growth and preservation.
3. Acid fluids released by the maturity of organic matter are responsible for the formation of an acidified diagenetic system. The dissolution of K-feldspar and carbonate minerals, as well as smectite illitization, provided ions for a variety of mesodiagenetic mineral cements, which resulted for instance in microquartz crystals, ferroan dolomites, kaolinite, and chlorite cemented in pores.
4. Although most rigid authigenic minerals directly precipitate in intergranular pores, they most likely contributed to reservoir quality via a slight reduction in the impact of compaction.
5. This study can be used to investigate authigenic minerals in comparable lacustrine organic-rich shale. However, significantly larger sample sets and in-situ high-resolution tests would be required to conduct case studies and assess their influence on shale reservoirs.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/min15050493/s1, Table S1: Mineral composition statistics of Es4U shale; Table S2: TOC and pyrolysis parameter statistics of Es4U shale; Table S3: Vitrinite reflectance parameter statistics of Es4U shale in Well FY1; Table S4: Contents of major elements of Es4U shale in well NX124; Table S5: Contents of trace elements of Es4U shale in well NX124.

Author Contributions

Methodology, J.Y. and Z.Y.; Software, Z.Y. and G.F.; Investigation, G.F.; Resources, J.Y., S.C. and P.Z.; Writing—original draft, J.Y. and Z.Y.; Writing—review & editing, J.Y. and Z.Y.; Supervision, J.Y. and S.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41572087).

Data Availability Statement

Restrictions apply to the availability of these data. Data were obtained from Shengli Oilfield and are available from the authors with the permission of Shengli Oilfield.

Acknowledgments

We extend our sincere appreciation to three anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions. Special thanks are also due to Assistant Editor and Academic Editor for their careful review, constructive comments, and assistance which have significantly improved the manuscript. We express our gratitude to the Shengli Oilfield Branch Company (SINOPEC) for generously providing the samples and permission for publication of this study.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Pengfei Zhang was employed by the company Shengli Oilfield. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Giles, M.R.; Marshall, J.D. Constraints on the development of secondary porosity in the subsurface: Re-evaluation of processes. Mar. Pet. Geol. 1986, 3, 243–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ronald, C.S.; Crossey, L.J.; Hagen, E.S.; Heasler, H.P. Organic-inorganic interactions and sandstone diagenesis. AAPG Bull. 1989, 73, 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  3. Giles, M.R.; Boer, R.B.d. Secondary porosity: Creation of enhanced porosities in the subsurface from the dissolution of carbonate cements as a result of cooling formation waters. Mar. Pet. Geol. 1989, 6, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Thyne, G. A model for diagenetic mass transfer between adjacent sandstone and shale. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2001, 18, 743–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Taylor, T.R.; Giles, M.R.; Hathon, L.A. Sandstone diagenesis and reservoir quality prediction: Models, myths, and reality. AAPG Bull. 2010, 94, 1093–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Han, S.; Yu, B.; Ruan, Z.; Bai, C.; Shen, Z.; Löhr, S.C. Diagenesis and fluid evolution in the third member of the Eocene Shahejie Formation, Bonan Sag, Bohai Bay Basin, China. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2021, 128, 105003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dill, H.G.; Luppold, F.W.; Techmer, A.; Chaodumrong, P.; Phoonphun, S. Lithology, micropaleontology and chemical composition of calcareous rocks of Paleozoic through Cenozoic age (Surat Thani Province, central Peninsular Thailand): Implications concerning the environment of deposition and the economic potential of limestones. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2004, 23, 63–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Poursoltani, M.R.; Gibling, M.R.; Pe-Piper, G. Diagenesis, burial history, and hydrocarbon potential of Cambrian sandstone in the northern continental margin of Gondwana: A case study of the Lalun Formation of central Iran. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2019, 172, 143–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Loucks, R.; Reed, R.; Ruppel, S.; Jarvie, D.M. Morphology, Genesis, and Distribution of Nanometer-Scale Pores in Siliceous Mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett Shale. J. Sediment. Res. 2009, 79, 848–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Milliken, K.L.; Rudnicki, M.; Awwiller, D.N.; Zhang, T. Organic matter-hosted pore system, Marcellus Formation (Devonian), Pennsylvania. AAPG Bull. 2013, 97, 177–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Taylor, K.G.; Macquaker, J.H.S. Diagenetic alterations in a silt- and clay-rich mudstone succession: An example from the Upper Cretaceous Mancos Shale of Utah, USA. Clay Miner. 2014, 49, 213–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, S.; Zhang, S.; Wang, Y.; Tan, M. Lithofacies types and reservoirs of Paleogene fine-grained sedimentary rocks Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin, China. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2016, 43, 218–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Aplin, A.C.; Macquaker, J.H.S. Mudstone diversity: Origin and implications for source, seal, and reservoir properties in petroleum systems. AAPG Bull. 2011, 95, 2031–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ruppel, S.C.; Reed, R.M.; Loucks, R.G. Spectrum of pore types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores. AAPG Bull. 2012, 96, 1071–1098. [Google Scholar]
  15. Schicker, A.; Gier, S.; Schieber, J.; Krois, P. Diagenesis of the Malmian Mikulov Formation source rock, Vienna Basin: Focus on matrix and pores. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2021, 129, 105082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gale, J.F.W.; Jon, E.O.; Laubach, S.E. Natural fractures in shale: A review and new observations. AAPG Bull. 2014, 98, 2165–2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Milliken, K.L.; Reed, R.M.; McCarty, D.K.; Bishop, J.; Lipinski, C.J.; Fischer, T.B.; Crousse, L.; Reijenstein, H. Grain assemblages and diagenesis in the Vaca Muerta Formation (Jurassic-Cretaceous), Neuquén Basin, Argentina. Sediment. Geol. 2019, 380, 45–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cobbold, P.R.; Zanella, A.; Rodrigues, N.; Løseth, H. Bedding-parallel fibrous veins (beef and cone-in-cone): Worldwide occurrence and possible significance in terms of fluid overpressure, hydrocarbon generation and mineralization. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2013, 43, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sun, B.; Yang, W. Folded calcite cracks in noncalcareous shales: A window into shale diagenesis and hydrothermal influence. J. Sediment. Res. 2023, 93, 875–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Luo, T.; Guo, X.; He, Z.; Dong, T.; Tao, Z.; Yang, R.; Wang, K. Fluid evolution and gas enrichment in the Wufeng-Longmaxi shale reservoirs of the eastern Sichuan Basin, SW China. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2024, 259, 105905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. O’Brien, N.R. Fabric of Kaolinite and Illite Floccules. Clays Clay Miner. 1971, 19, 353–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Peltonen, C.; Marcussen, Ø.; Bjørlykke, K.; Jahren, J. Clay mineral diagenesis and quartz cementation in mudstones: The effects of smectite to illite reaction on rock properties. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2009, 26, 887–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rodrigues, N.; Cobbold, P.R.; Loseth, H.; Ruffet, G. Widespread bedding-parallel veins of fibrous calcite (‘beef’) in a mature source rock (Vaca Muerta Fm, Neuquén Basin, Argentina): Evidence for overpressure and horizontal compression. J. Geol. Soc. 2009, 166, 695–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Peng, J.; Milliken, K.L.; Fu, Q. Quartz types in the Upper Pennsylvanian organic-rich Cline Shale (Wolfcamp D), Midland Basin, Texas: Implications for silica diagenesis, porosity evolution and rock mechanical properties. Sedimentology 2020, 67, 2040–2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xiong, Z.; Cao, Y.; Liang, C.; Liu, K.; Wang, G.; Zhu, R.; Lei, P.; Wang, Y. Origin and significance of authigenic quartz and albite in lacustrine calcareous fine-grained sedimentary rocks. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2022, 143, 105799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jahren, J.; Bjorlykke, K. Open or closed geochemical systems during diagenesis in sedimentary basins: Constraints on mass transfer during diagenesis and the prediction of porosity in sandstone and carbonate reservoirs. AAPG Bull. 2012, 96, 2193–2214. [Google Scholar]
  27. Friis, H.; Molenaar, N.; Varming, T. Chlorite meniscus cement–implications for diagenetic mineral growth after oil emplacement. Terra Nova 2014, 26, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wilson, R.D.; Chitale, J.; Huffman, K.; Montgomery, P.; Prochnow, S.J. Evaluating the depositional environment, lithofacies variation, and diagenetic processes of the Wolfcamp B and lower Spraberry intervals in the Midland Basin: Implications for reservoir quality and distribution. AAPG Bull. 2020, 104, 1287–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liang, C.; Wu, J.; Cao, Y.; Liu, K.; Khan, D. Storage space development and hydrocarbon occurrence model controlled by lithofacies in the Eocene Jiyang Sub-basin, East China: Significance for shale oil reservoir formation. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2022, 215, 110631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yu, Z.; Chen, S.; Zhang, S.; Liu, X.; Tang, D.; Yan, J. Influence of diagenesis on reservoir performance of shale: A case study of the upper sub-member of Member 4 of Paleogene Shahejie Formation in Dongying sag. J. Palaeogeogr. (Chin. Ed.) 2022, 24, 771–784. [Google Scholar]
  31. Seewald, J.S. Organic–inorganic interactions in petroleum-producing sedimentary basins. Nature 2003, 426, 327–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Taylor, K.G.; Macquaker, J.H.S.; Keller, M. Compositional controls on early diagenetic pathways in fine-grained sedimentary rocks: Implications for predicting unconventional reservoir attributes of mudstones. AAPG Bull. 2014, 98, 587–603. [Google Scholar]
  33. Raiswell, R. Evidence for surface reaction-controlled growth of carbonate concretions in shales. Sedimentology 1988, 35, 571–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Loucks, R.G.; Ruppel, S.C. Mississippian Barnett Shale: Lithofacies and depositional setting of a deep-water shale-gas succession in the Fort Worth Basin, Texas. AAPG Bull. 2007, 91, 579–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, M.; Sherwood, N.; Li, Z.; Lu, S.; Wang, W.; Huang, A.; Peng, J.; Lu, K. Shale oil occurring between salt intervals in the Dongpu Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2015, 152, 100–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Macaulay, C.I.; Haszeldine, R.S.; Fallick, A.E. Distribution, chemistry, isotopic composition and origin of diagenetic carbonates; Magnus Sandstone, North Sea. J. Sediment. Res. 1993, 63, 33–43. [Google Scholar]
  37. Macquaker, J.H.S.; Taylor, K.G.; Gawthorpe, R.L. High-Resolution Facies Analyses of Mudstones: Implications for Paleoenvironmental and Sequence Stratigraphic Interpretations of Offshore Ancient Mud-Dominated Successions. J. Sediment. Res. 2007, 77, 324–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Soliman, M.F.; El Goresy, A. Framboidal and idiomorphic pyrite in the upper Maastrichtian sedimentary rocks at Gabal Oweina, Nile Valley, Egypt: Formation processes, oxidation products and genetic implications to the origin of framboidal pyrite. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2012, 90, 195–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dowey, P.J.; Taylor, K.G.; Hendry, J. Diagenetic mineral development within the Upper Jurassic Haynesville-Bossier Shale, USA. Sedimentology 2020, 67, 47–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Canfield, D.E.; Thamdrup, B.; Hansen, J.W. The anaerobic degradation of oraganic matter in Danish coastal sediments: Iron reduction, manganese reduction, and sulfate reduction. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1993, 57, 3867–3883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Milkov, A.V. Methanogenic biodegradation of petroleum in the West Siberian Basin (Russia): Significance for formation of giant Cenomanian gas pools. AAPG Bull. 2010, 94, 1485–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Waliczek, M.; Machowski, G.; Więcław, D.; Konon, A.; Wandycz, P. Properties of solid bitumen and other organic matter from Oligocene shales of the Fore-Magura Unit in Polish Outer Carpathians: Microscopic and geochemical approach. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2019, 210, 103206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Schlegel, M.E.; McIntosh, J.C.; Petsch, S.T.; Orem, W.H.; Jones, E.J.P.; Martini, A.M. Extent and limits of biodegradation by in situ methanogenic consortia in shale and formation fluids. Appl. Geochem. 2013, 28, 172–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mastalerz, M.; Drobniak, A.; Schimmelmann, A. Porosity of Devonian and Mississippian New Albany Shale across a maturation gradient: Insights from organic petrology, gas adsorption, and mercury intrusion. AAPG Bull. 2013, 97, 1621–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tissot, B.; Durand, B.; Espitalié, J.; Combaz, A. Influence of Nature and Diagenesis of Organic Matter in Formation of Petroleum1. AAPG Bull. 1974, 58, 499–506. [Google Scholar]
  46. Curtis, M.E.; Cardott, B.J.; Sondergeld, C.H. Development of organic porosity in the Woodford Shale with increasing thermal maturity. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2012, 103, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Pommer, M.; Milliken, K. Pore types and pore-size distributions across thermal maturity, Eagle Ford Formation, southern Texas. AAPG Bull. 2015, 99, 1713–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cai, J.; Du, J.; Song, M.; Lei, T.; Wang, X.; Li, Y. Control of clay mineral properties on hydrocarbon generation of organo-clay complexes: Evidence from high-temperature pyrolysis experiments. Appl. Clay Sci. 2022, 216, 106368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Testa, G.; Lugli, S. Gypsum–anhydrite transformations in Messinian evaporites of central Tuscany (Italy). Sediment. Geol. 2000, 130, 249–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ferrage, E.; Vidal, O.; Mosser-Ruck, R.g.; Cathelineau, M.; Cuadros, J. A reinvestigation of smectite illitization in experimental hydrothermal conditions: Results from X-ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy. Am. Mineral. 2011, 96, 207–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, G.; Ran, L.; Xu, J.; Wang, Y.; Ma, L.; Zhu, R.; Wei, J.; He, H.; Xi, Y.; Zhu, J. Technical development of characterization methods provides insights into clay mineral-water interactions: A comprehensive review. Appl. Clay Sci. 2021, 206, 106088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, Y.; Yang, W.; Wang, Q.; Song, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Guo, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J. Influence of the actively migrated diagenetic elements on the hydrocarbon generation potential in tuffaceous shale. Fuel 2019, 256, 115795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Du, J.; Cai, J.; Zeng, X.; Zhang, Y.; Mu, X.; Wang, X. Depositional and diagenetic controls on hydrocarbon generation of mudstones through clay–organic matter interactions: A comparative study of the Dongpu Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2024, 262, 106000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yan, Y.; Wang, M.; Misch, D.; Sachsenhofer, R.F.; Wu, Y.; Li, J. Mineral diagenesis in lacustrine organic-rich shales: Evolution pathways and implications for reservoir characteristics. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2024, 263, 106026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, Y.; Hao, X.; Hu, Y. Orderly distribution and differential enrichment of hydrocarbon in oil-rich sags: A case study of Dongying Sag, Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, East China. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2018, 45, 785–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Song, M.; Liu, H.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y. Enrichment rules and exploration practices of Paleogene shale oil in Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2020, 47, 225–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Qiu, N.; Zuo, Y.; Xu, W.; Chang, J. Meso-Cenozoic thermal structure of the lithosphere in the Bohai Bay Basin, eastern North China Craton: Thermal structure in Bohai Bay Basin. Geol. J. 2015, 51, 794–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Fu, C.; Li, S.; Li, S.; Xu, J. Tectonostratigraphic evolution of a rift basin and corresponding source-to-sink systems: Implications for the western Bohai Bay Basin, North China. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2022, 139, 105587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wu, Q.; Xian, B.; Gao, X.; Bai, Q.; Wang, Z.; Liu, J.; Chen, P.; Li, Y.; Rahman, N.U.; Tian, R.; et al. Differences of sedimentary triggers and depositional architecture of lacustrine turbidites from normal regression to forced regression: Eocene Dongying depression, Bohai Bay Basin, East China. Sediment. Geol. 2022, 439, 106222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhang, J.; Jiang, Z.; Liang, C.; Baars, T.F.; Wang, Y.; Abels, H.A. Astronomical forcing of meter-scale organic-rich mudstone–limestone cyclicity in the Eocene Dongying sag, China: Implications for shale reservoir exploration. AAPG Bull. 2022, 106, 1557–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Liang, C.; Cao, Y.; Wu, J.; Han, Y.; Liu, K.; Hao, F.; Khan, D.; Mei, J.; Zhang, S.; Wang, Y. Water depth–terrigenous input dynamic equilibrium controls the Eocene lacustrine shale laminae records in Jiyang depression, Bohai Bay Basin, East China. AAPG Bull. 2023, 107, 1987–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Khan, D.; Zijun, L.; Qiu, L.; Kuiyuan, L.; Yongqiang, Y.; Cong, N.; Bin, L.; Li, X.; Habulashenmu, Y. Mineralogical and geochemical characterization of lacustrine calcareous shale in Dongying Depression, Bohai Bay Basin: Implications for paleosalinity, paleoclimate, and paleoredox conditions. Geochemistry 2023, 83, 125978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhao, X.; Zhou, L.; Pu, X.; Jin, F.; Shi, Z.; Han, W.; Jiang, W.; Han, G.; Zhang, W.; Wang, H.; et al. Formation conditions and enrichment model of retained petroleum in lacustrine shale: A case study of the Paleogene in Huanghua depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2020, 47, 856–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wang, M.; Ma, R.; Li, J.; Lu, S.; Li, C.; Guo, Z.; Li, Z. Occurrence mechanism of lacustrine shale oil in the Paleogene Shahejie Formation of Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2019, 46, 833–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bjorlykke, K. Clay mineral diagenesis in sedimentary basins; a key to the prediction of rock properties; examples from the North Sea Basin. Clay Miner. 1998, 33, 15–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Merriman, R.J. Clay minerals and sedimentary basin history. Eur. J. Mineral. 2005, 17, 7–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Penghui, Z.; Zhiyong, C.H.E.N.; Lu, X.; YanJun, B.; Yan, F. The differential diagenetic evolution and its influencing factors of Lower Cambrian black rock series in the northwestern margin of Tarim Basin. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2020, 36, 3463–3476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Li, K.; Xi, K.; Cao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Lin, M. Genesis of granular calcite in lacustrine fine-grained sedimentary rocks and its indication to volcanic-hydrothermal events: A case study of Permian Lucaogou Formation in Jimusar Sag, Junggar Basin, NW China. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2023, 50, 541–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhu, H.; Zhong, D.; Yao, J.; Sun, H.; Niu, X.; Liang, X.; You, Y.; Li, X. Alkaline diagenesis and its effects on reservoir porosity: A case study of Upper Triassic Chang 7 tight sandstones in Ordos Basin, NW China. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2015, 42, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. van de Kamp, P.C. Smectite-illite-muscovite transformations, quartz dissolution, and silica release in shales. Clays Clay Miner. 2008, 56, 66–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Niu, X.; Yan, D.; Zhuang, X.; Liu, Z.; Li, B.; Wei, X.; Xu, H.; Li, D. Origin of quartz in the lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation in south Hubei Province, upper Yangtze platform. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2018, 96, 271–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wedepohl, K.H. Environmental influences on the chemical composition of shales and clays. Phys. Chem. Earth 1971, 8, 307–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Li, L.; Bao, Z.; Li, Z.; Chen, L.; Xu, X.; Li, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Song, X. Origin of quartz and its implications for different phase fluids in lacustrine shales from the Qingshankou Formation, southern Songliao Basin, China. Geoenergy Sci. Eng. 2024, 234, 212673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Xi, Z.; Tang, S.; Lash, G.G.; Zhang, B.; Lin, D. Geochemical characteristics of organic carbon and pyrite sulfur in Ordovician-Silurian transition shales in the Yangtze Platform, South China: Implications for the depositional environment. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2021, 563, 110173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wilkin, R.T.; Barnes, H.L.; Brantley, S.L. The Size Distribution of Framboidal Pyrite in Modern Sediments—An Indicator of Redox Conditions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta J. Geochem. Soc. Meteorit. Soc. 1996, 60, 3897–3912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zuo, Q.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, Y. NanoSIMS sulfur isotope studies of pyrite from the Early Paleozoic marine shale: Implications for the sedimentary environment. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2021, 124, 104802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Chao, L.; Shichao, J.; Yingchang, C.; Keyu, L.; Jing, W.; Fang, H. Characteristics, origins, and significance of pyrites in deep-water shales. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2024, 67, 313–342. [Google Scholar]
  78. Love, L.G.; Amstutz, G.C. Review of microscopic pyrite from the Devonian Chattanooga Shale and Rammelsberg Banderz. Fortschr Miner. 1966, 43, 277–309. [Google Scholar]
  79. Baronov, A.; Bufkin, K.; Shaw, D.W.; Johnson, B.L.; Patrick, D.L. A simple model of burst nucleation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. PCCP 2015, 17, 20846–20852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Steinike, K. A further remark on biogenic sulfides; inorganic pyrite spheres. Econ. Geol. 1963, 58, 998–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Popa, R.; Kinkle, B.K.; Badescu, A. Pyrite Framboids as Biomarkers for Iron-Sulfur Systems. Geomicrobiol. J. 2004, 21, 193–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ren, Y.; Yang, X.; Hu, X.; Wei, J.; Tang, C. Mineralogical and geochemical evidence for biogenic uranium mineralization in northern Songliao Basin, NE China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2022, 141, 104556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hao, F.; Zhang, X.; Wang, C.; Li, P.; Guo, T.; Zou, H.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, J.; Cai, Z. The fate of CO2 derived from thermochemical sulfate reduction (TSR) and effect of TSR on carbonate porosity and permeability, Sichuan Basin, China. Earth Sci. Rev. 2015, 141, 154–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Land, L.S. Failure to Precipitate Dolomite at 25 °C fromDilute Solution Despite 1000-Fold Oversaturation after32 Years. Aquat. Geochem. 1998, 4, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Arvidson, R.S.; Mackenzie, F.T. The dolomite problem: Control of precipitation kinetics by temperature and saturation state. Am. J. Sci. 1999, 299, 257–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Roberts, J.A.; Bennett, P.C.; González, L.A.; Macpherson, G.L.; Milliken, K.L. Microbial precipitation of dolomite in methanogenic groundwater. Geology 2004, 32, 277–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Petrash, D.A.; Bialik, O.M.; Bontognali, T.R.R.; Vasconcelos, C.; Roberts, J.A.; McKenzie, J.A.; Konhauser, K.O. Microbially catalyzed dolomite formation: From near-surface to burial. Earth Sci. Rev. 2017, 171, 558–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Vasconcelos, C.; McKenzie, J.A. Microbial mediation of modern dolomite precipitation and diagenesis under anoxic conditions (Lagoa Vermelha, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). J. Sediment. Res. 1997, 67, 378–390. [Google Scholar]
  89. Wright, D.T. The role of sulphate-reducing bacteria and cyanobacteria in dolomite formation in distal ephemeral lakes of the Coorong region, South Australia. Sediment. Geol. 1999, 126, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Vasconcelos, C.; Warthmann, R.; McKenzie, J.A.; Visscher, P.T.; Bittermann, A.G.; Lith, Y.v. Lithifying microbial mats in Lagoa Vermelha, Brazil: Modern Precambrian relics? Sediment. Geol. 2006, 185, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Deng, S.; Dong, H.; Lv, G.; Jiang, H.; Yu, B.; Bishop, M. Microbial dolomite precipitation using sulfate reducing and halophilic bacteria: Results from Qinghai Lake, Tibetan Plateau, NW China. Chem. Geol. 2011, 278, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Hardie, L.A. On the Significance of Evaporites. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 1991, 19, 131–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Bojanowski, M.J. Authigenic dolomites in the Eocene-Oligocene organic carbon-rich shales from the Polish Outer Carpathians: Evidence of past gas production and possible gas hydrate formation in the Silesian basin. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2014, 51, 117–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Li, X.; Zhu, G.; Li, T.; Zhou, L.; Wu, Y.; Shen, B.; Ning, M. Conservative behavior of Mg isotopes in dolomite during diagenesis and hydrothermal alteration: A case study in the Lower Cambrian Qiulitage Formation, Gucheng area, Tarim Basin. Appl. Geochem. 2023, 148, 105540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Mitchell, R.H.; Smith, D.L. Geology and mineralogy of the Ashram Zone carbonatite, Eldor Complex, Québec. Ore Geol. Rev. 2017, 86, 784–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Zhao, W.; Shen, A.; Qiao, Z.; Pan, L.; Hu, A.; Zhang, J. Genetic types and distinguished characteristics of dolomite and the origin of dolomite reservoirs. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2018, 45, 923–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Xiong, Z.; Cao, Y.; Liang, C. Characteristics and origin of crystalline dolomite: A case from Paleogene lacustrine fine-grained rocks in Jiyang depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2024, 162, 106694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Metwally, Y.M.; Chesnokov, E.M. Clay mineral transformation as a major source for authigenic quartz in thermo-mature gas shale. Appl. Clay Sci. 2012, 55, 138–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Mavromatis, V.; Meister, P.; Oelkers, E.H. Using stable Mg isotopes to distinguish dolomite formation mechanisms: A case study from the Peru Margin. Chem. Geol. 2014, 385, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Chen, Z.; Wang, T.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, L. Quantitative evaluation of potential organic-matter porosity and hydrocarbon generation and expulsion from mudstone in continental lake basins: A case study of Dongying sag, eastern China. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2015, 66, 906–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zhang, S.; Yang, L.; De Paolo, D.J.; Steefel, C.I. Chemical affinity and pH effects on chlorite dissolution kinetics under geological CO2 sequestration related conditions. Chem. Geol. 2015, 396, 208–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Lowson, R.T.; Brown, P.L.; Comarmond, M.C.J.; Rajaratnam, G. The kinetics of chlorite dissolution. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2007, 71, 1431–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Liao, R.; Chen, W.; Wang, N.; Zhang, J. Combined effects of temperature, mineral type, and surface roughness on chlorite dissolution kinetics in the acidic pH. Appl. Clay Sci. 2021, 201, 105931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Smith, M.; Wolery, T.; Carroll, S. Kinetics of chlorite dissolution at elevated temperatures and CO2 conditions. Chem. Geol. 2013, 347, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Wooldridge, L.J.; Worden, R.H.; Griffiths, J.; Utley, J.E.P.; Thompson, A. The origin of clay-coated sand grains and sediment heterogeneity in tidal flats. Sediment. Geol. 2018, 373, 191–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Zuo, R.; Cai, J.; Zeng, X.; Cheng, S. Detrital clay mineral input reconstructed based on weathering records and its influence on organic matter enrichment: A case study of the Paleogene Shahejie Formation in the Dongpu Sag, Bohai Bay Basin. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2024, 276, 106360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Mosser, C. The use of B, Li and Sn in determining the origin of some sedimentary clays. Chem. Geol. 1983, 38, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. D’Ascanio, V.; Greco, D.; Menicagli, E.; Santovito, E.; Catucci, L.; Logrieco, A.F.; Avantaggiato, G. The role of geological origin of smectites and of their physico-chemical properties on aflatoxin adsorption. Appl. Clay Sci. 2019, 181, 105209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Xin, C.; Jianhua, Z.; Jing, Y.; Keke, N.; Yuping, Y. Development and formation of Paleogene kaolinite, Bonan subsag. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2009, 36, 456–462. [Google Scholar]
  110. Beaufort, D.; Rigault, C.; Billon, S.; Billault, V.; Inoue, A.; Inoue, S.; Patrier, P. Chlorite and chloritization processes through mixed-layer mineral series in low-temperature geological systems—A review. Clay Miner. 2015, 50, 497–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Liu, Y.; Ma, K.; Hou, J.; Yan, L.; Chen, F. Diagenetic controls on the quality of the Middle Permian Lucaogou Formation tight reservoir, southeastern Junggar Basin, northwestern China. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2019, 178, 139–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Velde, B. Compaction trends of clay-rich deep sea sediments. Mar. Geol. 1996, 133, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Wang, F.; Feng, Z.; Wang, X.; Zeng, H. Effect of organic matter, thermal maturity and clay minerals on pore formation and evolution in the Gulong Shale, Songliao Basin, China. Geoenergy Sci. Eng. 2023, 223, 211507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Milliken, K.L.; Zhang, T.; Chen, J.; Ni, Y. Mineral diagenetic control of expulsion efficiency in organic-rich mudrocks, Bakken Formation (Devonian-Mississippian), Williston Basin, North Dakota, U.S.A. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2021, 127, 104869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Liang, C.; Cao, Y.; Liu, K.; Jiang, Z.; Wu, J.; Hao, F. Diagenetic variation at the lamina scale in lacustrine organic-rich shales: Implications for hydrocarbon migration and accumulation. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2018, 229, 112–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Wang, X.; Liu, L.; Wang, Y.; Sheng, Y.; Zheng, S.; Wu, W.; Luo, Z. Comparison of the pore structures of Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation shales with different lithofacies in the southern Sichuan Basin, China. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2020, 81, 103419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Fishman, N.S.; Hackley, P.C.; Lowers, H.; Hill, R.J.; Egenhoff, S.O.; Eberl, D.D.; Blum, A.E. The nature of porosity in organic-rich mudstones of the Upper Jurassic Kimmeridge Clay Formation, North Sea, offshore United Kingdom. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2012, 103, 32–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Wilson, R.D.; Schieber, J.; Nie, H.; Sun, C.; Liu, G.; Li, Y.; Schieber, J.; Fan, T.; Li, Z.; Schieber, J. The influence of primary and secondary sedimentary features on reservoir quality: Examples from the geneseo formation of New York, U.S.A. AAPG Mem. 2016, 112, 167–183. [Google Scholar]
  119. Dowey, P.J.; Taylor, K.G. Extensive authigenic quartz overgrowths in the gas-bearing Haynesville-Bossier Shale, USA. Sediment. Geol. 2017, 356, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Lalonde, K.; Mucci, A.; Ouellet, A.; Gélinas, Y. Preservation of organic matter in sediments promoted by iron. Nature 2012, 483, 198–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Zhang, S.; Liu, H.; Song, G.; Wang, Y.; Chen, S.; Zhang, S. Genesis and control factors of shale oil reserving space in Dongying sag. Acta Pet. Sin. 2016, 37, 1495–1507,1527. [Google Scholar]
  122. Davis, K.J.; Dove, P.M.; Yoreo, J.J.D. The Role of Mg2+ as an Impurity in Calcite Growth. Science 2000, 290, 1134–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Klasa, J.; Ruiz-Agudo, E.; Wang, L.; Putnis, C.; Valsami-Jones, E.; Menneken, M.; Putnis, A. An atomic force microscopy study of the dissolution of calcite in the presence of phosphate ions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2013, 117, 115–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Naviaux, J.D.; Subhas, A.V.; Rollins, N.E.; Dong, S.; Berelson, W.M.; Adkins, J.F. Temperature dependence of calcite dissolution kinetics in seawater. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2019, 246, 363–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Stefansson, A. Dissolution of primary minerals of basalt in natural waters I. Calculation of mineral solubilities from 0 °C to 350 °C. Chem. Geol. 2001, 172, 225–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Milliken, K. A Compositional Classification for Grain Assemblages in Fine-Grained Sediments and Sedimentary Rocks. J. Sediment. Res. 2014, 84, 1185–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Yuan, G.; Cao, Y.; Gluyas, J.; Jia, Z. Reactive transport modeling of coupled feldspar dissolution and secondary mineral precipitation and its implication for diagenetic interaction in sandstones. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2017, 207, 232–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Aagaard, P.; Egeberg, P.K.; Saigal, G.C.; Morad, S.; Bjorlykke, K. Diagenetic albitization of detrital K-feldspars in Jurassic, Lower Cretaceous and Tertiary clastic reservoir rocks from offshore Norway; II, Formation water chemistry and kinetic considerations. J. Sediment. Res. 1990, 60, 575–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Nicholson, P.H.; Esch, W.L.; Ajdukiewicz, J.M. Prediction of deep reservoir quality using early diagenetic process models in the jurassic norphlet formation, gulf of Mexico. AAPG Bull. 2010, 94, 1189–1227. [Google Scholar]
  130. Porten, K.; Kane, I.; Warchoł, M.; Southern, S.J. A Sedimentological Process-Based Approach to Depositional Reservoir Quality of Deep-Marine Sandstones: An Example from the Springar Formation, Northwestern Vøring Basin, Norwegian Sea. J. Sediment. Res. 2016, 86, 1269–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Liu, D.; Yuan, P.; Liu, H.; Li, T.; Tan, D.; Yuan, W.; He, H. High-pressure adsorption of methane on montmorillonite, kaolinite and illite. Appl. Clay Sci. 2013, 85, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (A) Location of the Bohai Bay Basin in China. (B) Tectonic divisions of the Bohai Bay Basin. (C) The sedimentary environment of the upper sub-member of the 4th member of the Shahejie Formation (Es4U) in the Dongying Depression. (D) Composite lithostratigraphic charts of the Dongying Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, East China. The study interval is the Es4U.
Figure 1. (A) Location of the Bohai Bay Basin in China. (B) Tectonic divisions of the Bohai Bay Basin. (C) The sedimentary environment of the upper sub-member of the 4th member of the Shahejie Formation (Es4U) in the Dongying Depression. (D) Composite lithostratigraphic charts of the Dongying Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, East China. The study interval is the Es4U.
Minerals 15 00493 g001
Figure 2. (A) Mineralogical composition and classification of shales from Es4U. (B) Bar graph showing relative content of clay minerals of shales from Es4U. (C) Core thin sections and XRD data showing lithofacies types and the sedimentary structures of shales from Es4U.
Figure 2. (A) Mineralogical composition and classification of shales from Es4U. (B) Bar graph showing relative content of clay minerals of shales from Es4U. (C) Core thin sections and XRD data showing lithofacies types and the sedimentary structures of shales from Es4U.
Minerals 15 00493 g002
Figure 3. Organic geochemistry characteristics of shales from Es4U. (A) Relationship between S1 and TOC, and OSI showing shale oil potential producibility. (B) Plot of S2 versus TOC showing the hydrocarbon potential. (C) Plot of the hydrogen index (HI) versus pyrolysis Tmax showing the type and maturity of OM.
Figure 3. Organic geochemistry characteristics of shales from Es4U. (A) Relationship between S1 and TOC, and OSI showing shale oil potential producibility. (B) Plot of S2 versus TOC showing the hydrocarbon potential. (C) Plot of the hydrogen index (HI) versus pyrolysis Tmax showing the type and maturity of OM.
Minerals 15 00493 g003
Figure 4. SEM images of typical authigenic minerals. (A) Microquartz appears in intergranular pores of calcite and clays, as shown in images of fresh fracture surfaces from the F143 well at a depth of 3116.82 m. (B) Framboidal pyrite with nearly equigranular submicron-sized crystals, as shown in Ar-polished images of the NX124 well at a depth of 3216 m. (C) Euhedral pyrites with isolated single crystals associated with organic matter, as shown in Ar-polished images of the NX124 well at a depth of 3221 m. (D) Ferroan dolomite exhibits an irregular core and annular bright rim with a size of about 9.5 μm, as shown in Ar-polished images of the NX124 well at a depth of 3221 m. (E) Kaolinite appears in leaf-like shapes, as shown in images of fresh fracture surfaces from the F143 well at a depth of 3128.39 m. (F) Kaolinite appears in book-like shapes with authigenic quartz, as shown in images of fresh fracture surfaces from the F143 well at a depth of 3021 m. (G) Chlorite appears in hairy shapes with calcite, as shown in images of fresh fracture surfaces from the F143 well at a depth of 3110 m. (H) Chlorite appears in plate-like shapes, as shown in images of fresh fracture surfaces from the FY1 well at a depth of 3112.85 m. (I) Euhedral albite appears with dissolved K-feldspar and illite, as shown in images of fresh fracture surfaces from the FY1 well at a depth of 3387.5 m.
Figure 4. SEM images of typical authigenic minerals. (A) Microquartz appears in intergranular pores of calcite and clays, as shown in images of fresh fracture surfaces from the F143 well at a depth of 3116.82 m. (B) Framboidal pyrite with nearly equigranular submicron-sized crystals, as shown in Ar-polished images of the NX124 well at a depth of 3216 m. (C) Euhedral pyrites with isolated single crystals associated with organic matter, as shown in Ar-polished images of the NX124 well at a depth of 3221 m. (D) Ferroan dolomite exhibits an irregular core and annular bright rim with a size of about 9.5 μm, as shown in Ar-polished images of the NX124 well at a depth of 3221 m. (E) Kaolinite appears in leaf-like shapes, as shown in images of fresh fracture surfaces from the F143 well at a depth of 3128.39 m. (F) Kaolinite appears in book-like shapes with authigenic quartz, as shown in images of fresh fracture surfaces from the F143 well at a depth of 3021 m. (G) Chlorite appears in hairy shapes with calcite, as shown in images of fresh fracture surfaces from the F143 well at a depth of 3110 m. (H) Chlorite appears in plate-like shapes, as shown in images of fresh fracture surfaces from the FY1 well at a depth of 3112.85 m. (I) Euhedral albite appears with dissolved K-feldspar and illite, as shown in images of fresh fracture surfaces from the FY1 well at a depth of 3387.5 m.
Minerals 15 00493 g004
Figure 5. SEM images of typical authigenic minerals. (A) Euhedral microquartz crystals distributed with illite, as shown in images of fresh fracture surfaces from the F143 well at a depth of 3019 m. (B) Euhedral microquartz crystal growth and dissolved K-feldspar, as shown in images of fresh fracture surfaces from the FY1 well at a depth of 3327 m. (C) Partly dissolved detrital quartz in contact with pyrite and illite, as shown in Ar-polished images from the NX124 well at a depth of 3214.15 m. (D) Fragmentary detrital quartz and precipitate of pyrite in dissolved pores, as shown in Ar-polished images from the NX124 well at a depth of 3221 m.
Figure 5. SEM images of typical authigenic minerals. (A) Euhedral microquartz crystals distributed with illite, as shown in images of fresh fracture surfaces from the F143 well at a depth of 3019 m. (B) Euhedral microquartz crystal growth and dissolved K-feldspar, as shown in images of fresh fracture surfaces from the FY1 well at a depth of 3327 m. (C) Partly dissolved detrital quartz in contact with pyrite and illite, as shown in Ar-polished images from the NX124 well at a depth of 3214.15 m. (D) Fragmentary detrital quartz and precipitate of pyrite in dissolved pores, as shown in Ar-polished images from the NX124 well at a depth of 3221 m.
Minerals 15 00493 g005
Figure 6. The cross plot of Sr/Ba and n-values (MgO/Al2O3 ∗ 100) for determining the sedimentary environment.
Figure 6. The cross plot of Sr/Ba and n-values (MgO/Al2O3 ∗ 100) for determining the sedimentary environment.
Minerals 15 00493 g006
Figure 7. The determination of the origin of different silica types. (A) The cross plot of calculated Sitotal and measured Si. (B) The cross plot of three types of silica content and Zr.
Figure 7. The determination of the origin of different silica types. (A) The cross plot of calculated Sitotal and measured Si. (B) The cross plot of three types of silica content and Zr.
Minerals 15 00493 g007
Figure 8. The cross plot of the average particle size versus the standard deviation of the framboid sizes, and the lines at the euxinic–anoxic and the anoxic–dysoxic boundaries are obtained from [75].
Figure 8. The cross plot of the average particle size versus the standard deviation of the framboid sizes, and the lines at the euxinic–anoxic and the anoxic–dysoxic boundaries are obtained from [75].
Minerals 15 00493 g008
Figure 9. The elemental characteristics and Ar-polished photomicrographs of ferroan dolomite. (A) The NX124 well at a depth of 3213 m. (B) The NX124 well at a depth of 3223 m.
Figure 9. The elemental characteristics and Ar-polished photomicrographs of ferroan dolomite. (A) The NX124 well at a depth of 3213 m. (B) The NX124 well at a depth of 3223 m.
Minerals 15 00493 g009
Figure 10. The determination of the origin of ferroan dolomite. (A) The cross plot of ferroan dolomite and the value of Mg + Fe. (B) The cross plot of Mg and Fe. (C) The cross plot of K and the value of Mg + Fe. (D) The cross plot of the content of ferroan dolomite and calcite.
Figure 10. The determination of the origin of ferroan dolomite. (A) The cross plot of ferroan dolomite and the value of Mg + Fe. (B) The cross plot of Mg and Fe. (C) The cross plot of K and the value of Mg + Fe. (D) The cross plot of the content of ferroan dolomite and calcite.
Minerals 15 00493 g010
Figure 11. The determination of the origin of clay minerals. (A) The cross plot of the content of feldspar and kaolinite. (B) The cross plot of the content of kaolinite and chlorite.
Figure 11. The determination of the origin of clay minerals. (A) The cross plot of the content of feldspar and kaolinite. (B) The cross plot of the content of kaolinite and chlorite.
Minerals 15 00493 g011
Figure 12. The determination of the origin of albite. (A) The cross plot of Na versus the value of Fe + Mg. (B) The cross plot of Na and the content of plagioclase.
Figure 12. The determination of the origin of albite. (A) The cross plot of Na versus the value of Fe + Mg. (B) The cross plot of Na and the content of plagioclase.
Minerals 15 00493 g012
Figure 13. Ar-polished photomicrographs of albite. (A) The NX124 well at a depth of 3214.15 m. (B) The NX124 well at a depth of 3223 m.
Figure 13. Ar-polished photomicrographs of albite. (A) The NX124 well at a depth of 3214.15 m. (B) The NX124 well at a depth of 3223 m.
Minerals 15 00493 g013
Figure 14. Diagenetic evolution model of authigenic minerals. The thermal evolution characteristics of organic matter and acid concentration changes were modified from [97]. BI + HC + N, S, O-Inherited bitumen + hydrocarbons + nitrogen, sulfur and oxygen compounds; HA-Humic acid; FA-Fulvic acid; CH-Carbohydrates; AA-Amino acid; L-Lipid.
Figure 14. Diagenetic evolution model of authigenic minerals. The thermal evolution characteristics of organic matter and acid concentration changes were modified from [97]. BI + HC + N, S, O-Inherited bitumen + hydrocarbons + nitrogen, sulfur and oxygen compounds; HA-Humic acid; FA-Fulvic acid; CH-Carbohydrates; AA-Amino acid; L-Lipid.
Minerals 15 00493 g014
Figure 15. The influence of authigenic minerals on shale reservoir porosity. (A) The cross plot of Siclay and porosity. (B) The cross plot of ferroan dolomite and porosity. (C) The cross plot of albite (albite is almost the only plagioclase phase from SEM) and porosity. (D) The cross plot of pyrite and porosity. (E) The cross plot of kaolinite and porosity. (F) The cross plot of chlorite and porosity.
Figure 15. The influence of authigenic minerals on shale reservoir porosity. (A) The cross plot of Siclay and porosity. (B) The cross plot of ferroan dolomite and porosity. (C) The cross plot of albite (albite is almost the only plagioclase phase from SEM) and porosity. (D) The cross plot of pyrite and porosity. (E) The cross plot of kaolinite and porosity. (F) The cross plot of chlorite and porosity.
Minerals 15 00493 g015
Table 1. Diagenetic division indices of the Es4U shale.
Table 1. Diagenetic division indices of the Es4U shale.
Dividing IndexNumberDistribution Range (or Main Type)Diagenetic Stage
Ro/%220.52–0.93Mesodiagegesis A
Tmax/°C90431–461 °CMesodiagegesis A
Type and combination of clay minerals43(I/S + I + C)Mesodiagegesis A
43The ratio of I/S is 20%Mesodiagegesis A
43Ordered I/SMesodiagegesis A
30Acicular and flocculentMesodiagegesis A
Type and crystallinity of carbonate minerals30Sparry calciteMesodiagegesis A
30Ferroan dolomiteMesodiagegesis A
Type of pores30Dissolved pores and recrystallized intergranular poresMesodiagegesis A
Color of sporopollen39Light yellow to blackMesodiagegesis A
Table 2. Calculated percentages of quartz of different origins of shales from Es4U.
Table 2. Calculated percentages of quartz of different origins of shales from Es4U.
SamplesDepth/mAl/%Si/%(Si/Al)totalSidet/%Siclay/%Siexcess/%Sitotal/%
NX124-23213.0010.7041.003.8333.284.560.1938.02
NX124-43214.159.8634.803.5330.664.690.1235.48
NX124-73216.0011.1038.403.4634.525.630.1040.25
NX124-103218.007.5427.403.6323.452.890.1426.49
NX124-153221.0012.5042.703.4238.885.930.0944.90
NX124-193223.0011.9043.503.6637.015.150.1542.31
NX124-233226.2510.7036.303.3933.285.220.0838.58
NX124-283229.108.4434.004.0326.254.310.2330.79
NX124-323231.606.9034.505.0021.463.830.3825.67
NX124-383234.158.2432.703.9725.633.710.2229.55
NX124-473238.7011.2037.603.3634.834.700.0739.61
NX124-573243.1516.1050.203.1250.0710.260.0060.33
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yan, J.; Chen, S.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, P.; Feng, G. Origin and Reservoir Significance of Authigenic Minerals in Lacustrine Shales: A Case Study from the Paleogene Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin, East China. Minerals 2025, 15, 493. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15050493

AMA Style

Yan J, Chen S, Yu Z, Zhang P, Feng G. Origin and Reservoir Significance of Authigenic Minerals in Lacustrine Shales: A Case Study from the Paleogene Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin, East China. Minerals. 2025; 15(5):493. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15050493

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yan, Jihua, Shiyue Chen, Zhiyun Yu, Pengfei Zhang, and Guozheng Feng. 2025. "Origin and Reservoir Significance of Authigenic Minerals in Lacustrine Shales: A Case Study from the Paleogene Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin, East China" Minerals 15, no. 5: 493. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15050493

APA Style

Yan, J., Chen, S., Yu, Z., Zhang, P., & Feng, G. (2025). Origin and Reservoir Significance of Authigenic Minerals in Lacustrine Shales: A Case Study from the Paleogene Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin, East China. Minerals, 15(5), 493. https://doi.org/10.3390/min15050493

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop