Next Article in Journal
Distribution Law of Mine Ground Pressure via a Microseismic Sensor System
Next Article in Special Issue
Age and Petrogenesis of the Dongjin Rare Metal Mineralized Intrusion in the Northern Margin of the North China Craton
Previous Article in Journal
Authigenic Fe Mineralization in Shallow to Marginal Marine Environments: A Case Study from the Late Paleocene—Early Eocene Cambay Shale Formation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of Phosphatization in REY Geochemistry in Ferromanganese Crusts in Line Islands, Central Pacific
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Critical Metals Mineralization in the Late-Stage Intrusions of Salmi Batholith, Ladoga Karelia, Russia

by
Vasily I. Ivashchenko
Institute of Geology KarRC, RAS, 185910 Petrozavodsk, Russia
Minerals 2023, 13(5), 648; https://doi.org/10.3390/min13050648
Submission received: 31 March 2023 / Revised: 3 May 2023 / Accepted: 3 May 2023 / Published: 7 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Critical Metals on Land and in the Ocean)

Abstract

:
The paper reports the results of studies on critical metal mineralization genetically related to the late-stage intrusions of Salmi anorthosite-rapakivi granite batholith (SARGB) in the Riphean age. In, Bi, and Be mineralization in skarn-greisen deposits and occurrences at the SARGB endocontact, as well as REE and Nb-Ta mineralization in Li-F granites, understood as the late intrusive phases of the batholith, were studied. It is the first report on columbite-group minerals, as well as REE-Ta-Nb and REE mineralization in SARGB granites. Optical and scanning electron microscopy, EDS and LA ICP MS microanalysis, X-ray fluorescence spectrometry, Raman spectroscopy, and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) were used. The data obtained show that roquesite formation was mainly triggered by the decay of In-bearing solid sphalerite and chalcopyrite solutions. Zavaritskite, associated with unoxidized sulphides, was derived hypogenically and seldom occurs in ores. A helvine-group mineral association with zinc-enriched spinel (ZnO 22%–25%) seems to have been one of the factors preventing genthelvite formation. The Muzilampi, Hepaoja and Avtodor ore occurrences in Li-F granites display similar REE and Nb-Ta mineralization. They are associated with Y-fluorite and Li-siderophyllite, which contain exceptionally high Nb concentrations (0.25%–0.78%) in Muzilampi granites. Additionally, fluorite-1 is commonly overfilled (to >50%) with micron-sized synchisite and parisite inclusions. Columbite-tantalite-group minerals, present at all the occurrences studied, occur solely as ferricolumbites with a dominant Mn/(Mn + Fe) ratio of <0.2. Biotite and Li-siderophyllite, associated with columbite, have an extremely high iron index Fe/(Fe + Mg) > 0.9 approaching the maximum values (~1.0) in the most differentiated granites.

1. Introduction

Modern high-tech production and science-intensive technologies are largely based on the use of rare metals generally recognized as critical minerals [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Progress in the modern global economy is impossible without critical metals. Their application range is very wide [1,6,7,8,9]. Russia has no government-endorsed list of critical minerals, but there is a list of the basic types of strategic minerals [10], which includes metals critical for Russia [11]. The deposits and occurrences of some of the metals are located in the Ladoga region of Russian Karelia [12]. They are concentrated mainly in the Pitkäranta Mining District (PMD). Their formation is believed to be associated with the SARGB [13,14,15,16,17,18] (Figure 1). The mineralogy of rare and critical metals in skarns from this area has been studied earlier [16,19,20,21]. The first results of the studies were based solely on optical and X-ray structural methods, but no chemical analyses were performed [16,19], resulting in some inaccuracies in identification of the minerals (particularly isomorphic series) and in the determination of rare-metal distribution in ore and skarn minerals. It was assumed, for example [16], that Be in skarn ores is almost entirely present isomorphically in vesuvianite, but the assumption was not quite correct. The main Be-concentrating minerals in greisenized skarns from the study area are danalite, bertrandite and chrysoberyl [19,20]. Recent studies on rare-metal mineralization in PMD dealt mainly with In, Bi and Be mineralogy in skarn-greisen associations [20,21]. However, ore localities in the late-stage intrusions of SARGB, consisting of rare-metal Li-F granites, have not been studied mineralogically.
The present paper reports the results of mineralogo-geochemical studies on ore mineralization (Ta, Nb, REE) in these granites. It is the first attempt to describe columbite-group minerals (CGM), REE-Ta-Nb and REE mineralization in SARGB granites. Earlier evidence for rare-metal mineralization in PMD skarns [20,21] is presented together with new data on their Be, Bi, and In mineralogy. The genesis of critical metal mineralization (CMM) in PMD is discussed and its industrial potential is appraised.

2. Geological Setting of the Salmi Batholith

SARGB is located at the eastern flank of the Ladoga Structure (Figure 1) recognized as part of the Mesoproterozoic Svecofennian Fold Belt, which evolved for over 1 Ga, witnessing continental and ocean-margin rifting and the opening of the Svecofennian Ocean followed by the convergent interaction of newly-formed oceanic crust with an Archean craton, the closure of the ocean and the formation of an accretion-collision orogen [22,23]. Post-collisional uplift, cratonization, and discrete intraplate magmatism took place at the final stage (SARGB—1.55–1.53 Ga) [16,23].
The Archean basement rocks (2.7–2.66 Ga gneiss, granite gneiss, and amphibolite) of the Ladoga Structure persist only as ”rimmed granite-gneiss domes” after P. Eskola [24]. Their formation mechanism has been the subject of long discussion [23,25,26]. The domes are rimmed by Pitkäranta volcanic-sedimentary rocks (Ludicovian 2.1–1.92 Ga) overlain by Ladoga turbidites (Kalevian 1.92–1.8 Ga) (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Pitkäranta carbonate rocks were metamorphosed to marbles, calciphyres, and skarns, with which complex (Sn-Cu-Zn-Fe-Be-In) mineralization at the SARGB exocontact is associated [13,14,15,16]. Ludicovian and Kalevian rocks are cut by Svecofennian (syn- and post-orogenic) granites and pegmatites, as well as SARGB of Riphean age. In the south of the area, all the above structural-mineralogical complexes are overlain through their weathering crust by Jotnian volcanic-sedimentary rocks (1.48 Ga Salmi suite) [16,23] (Figure 1 and Figure 2).
SARGB is part of the Ladoga-Dalecarlian anorthosite-rapakivi granite pluton belt stretching for almost 2000 km along the southern Fennoscandian Shield boundary (Figure 1) [16]. Similarly to most plutons of this belt, it intruded across long-lived weakened zones controlled locally by Late Svecofennian collision sutures. SARGB consists of the Salmi Massif proper, which intruded into Lower Proterozoic (Jatulian, Ludicovian, and Kalevian) supracrustal complexes, and its satellite, the Ulälega Massif, which cuts the Archean Karelian Craton (Figure 1). SARGB was produced by six discrete mafic and felsic magma intrusion impulses during ~17 Ma (1546.7 ± 1.7–1529.9 ± 0.6) [16,27]. The southwestern portion of the batholite is cut by subvolcanic basic rock bodies, comagmates of 1459–1457 Ma Salmi basalts [28], and the northeastern portion is cut by Enäjoki mildly alkaline medium-basic rocks of unknown age.
Geophysical data show that SARGB is a subhorizontal plate-like body varying in thickness from 2 km in its northwestern portion to 10 km in its southeastern portion [17,29]. As the rocks are succeeded locally in the same direction, their basicity and age increase (Figure 1).
The granitoids of the batholith are subdivided arbitrarily into three groups [16,30] recognized earlier [14,15] as intrusion phases: (1) biotite-amphibole granites, (2) biotite granites, (3) inequigranular Li-siderophyllitic and topaz-bearing zinnwalditic Li-F granites. In this series of granites, Ta and Nb concentrations increase gradually and Nb/Ta ratio decreases [30]. Li-F granites are widespread on the northwestern Salmi Massif margin in the southern PMD (Figure 2) and in the northern Ulälega Massif (Figure 1), making up small morphologically complex stock-like bodies and dikes. Their apical and endocontact zones are typically layered, forming striated textures, fluorite mineralization, (Figure 3) and stockscheider. The dark-colored minerals (biotite-lepidomelane, protolithionite, siderophyllite, zinnwaldite, ferrohastingsite, ferrohedenbergite and fayalite) of granitoids in all three groups are rich in iron [Fe/(Fe + Mg)] = 0.8–1.0. Fluorite, zircon, apatite, ilmenite, magnetite, anatase, allanite, uraninite, and thorite commonly occur as accessories. Granites of the second and third groups also contain monazite, bastnäsite, topaz, cassiterite, rutile, ilmenorutile, columbite, pyrochlore, and thorianite.
The REE distribution spectra of highly differentiated rare-metal siderophyllitic and lithium-fluorine (SARGB) granites exhibit a tetrad-effect of M-type [31]. This and other geochemical characteristics systematized by A.M. Larin [16], together with a low Zr/Hf ratio [12,21] (Figure 4), indicate a high rare-metal potential of SARGB’s Li-F granites.
In spite of the Sn-base metal specialization of SARGB granitoids [14], F concentration in the fluid equiponderous with the Li-F granite melt of this batholith is similar to that of Ta deposits in Li-F granites known in other regions [31].

3. Materials and Methods

Critical metal minerals and parent rocks were examined using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), LA ICP MS, X-ray fluorescence (XRF), Raman spectroscopy, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), and wet chemistry at the Institute of Geology, Karelian Research Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences (IG KRC RAS, Petrozavodsk, Russia).
Samples taken from natural rock exposures, exploration workings, ore spoil heaps in old mines, drill cores, as well as thin sections and polished sections kept at the Territorial Geological Fund for the Republic of Karelia, Petrozavodsk were studied.
A total of over 250 samples from the Old and New Ore Fields of the Pitkäranta deposit, the Hopunvaara and Lupikko ore fields, the Kitelä deposit, as well as the Kulismajoki, Muzilampi, Hepaoja and Avtodor occurrences, were analyzed. Specimens for ICP MS and XRF analysis were prepared from all samples and polished sections were created. The polished sections were studied by optical microscopy (an Axiolab pol-u optical microscope equipped with a digital photographic camera and a computer).
The composition of the minerals was analyzed in polished thin sections with a VEGA II LSH scanning electron microscope (Tescan, Brno, Czech Republic). The instrument was equipped with an energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS) Energy 350 system and an SDD X-Act3 detector (Oxford Inca Energy, Oxford, UK). Operating conditions were: 20 kV accelerating voltage, 5 nA probe current, 1 µs EDS process time, 105 cnts/s, 30 s counting time. The spectral lines for each element are CuKα, FeKα, ZnKα, MnKα, SKα, FKα, InLα, AgLα, AuLα, TeLα, SeLα, SnLα, AsLα, BiMα, PbMα, WMα. The standards used were: CaCO3, CaF2, FeS2, PbTe, HgTe, TlSbSe2, InAs, NaCl, Cu, Co, Ni, Zn, Mn, As, Se, Ag, Au, Sn, Te, W, and Bi. SEM-EDS quantitative data were obtained and processed using a Microanalysis Suite Issue 12, INCA Suite version 4.01; standard deviation (S) for In—0.6%–1.8%, Pb—1.3%–4.4%, Bi—0.8%–4.2%, Te—0.4%–2.0%, Se—0.4%–1.3%, Cu—0.7%–2.3%, Zn—1.0%–2.4%, Ag—0.3%–2.3%, S—0.4%–0.7%.
Trace elements in ore minerals were identified by the LA-ICP-MS method on an X-SERIES-2 quadrupole mass-spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a UP-266 Macro Laser Ablation attachment (New Wave Research, MODEL UP266 MACRO AT, Fermont, CA, USA) in the IG KSC RAS following the method described in [33]. The Nd:Yag laser operates at a wavelength of 266 nm and an energy output of 0.133 mJ (scan speed 70 µm/s, impulse frequency 10 Hz). All measurements were performed with identical parameters. Standard NIST 612 (National Institute of Standards and Technology USA) was used for calibration procedures. The trace element concentration values measured have the following relative standard deviation (RSD) parameters: for transition metals (Co, Mn, Cr, V, Cu, Zn) < 15%, for As < 20%, for In, Cd < 25%.
Major element concentrations in the granites were estimated by wet chemistry and XRF. XRF analysis was performed using an ARL ADVANT’X-2331 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Ecublens, Switzerland) wavelength-dispersive spectrometer with a rhodium tube, working voltage of 60 kV, working current of 50 mA, and resolution of 0.01. Preliminarily, 2 g of each powdered sample was heated in ceramic crucibles, at 1000 °C, in a muffle furnace for 30 min. The loss of ignition was determined by a change in sample mass upon heating. For XRF measurements, 1 g of heated sample was mixed with Li-tetraborate flux and heated in an Au-Pt crucible to 1100 °C to form a fused bead.
Trace and rare-earth element concentrations were calculated by ICP-MS using an X Series 2 (Thermo Scientific, Bremen, Germany) mass spectrometer. Powdered samples were digested in acid mixture following a standard procedure [33]. Analytical accuracy was monitored by analyzing the USGS standard BHVO-2.
Raman spectroscopy was used to identify beryllium mineral phases. Raman spectroscopy analysis was conducted on a dispersive Nicolet Almega XR Raman spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with a green laser (532 nm, Nd-YAG (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The spectra were collected at a spectral resolution of 2 cm−1. A confocal microscope with a 50× lens was used to focus an excitation laser beam on the sample and to collect a Raman signal from a 2 µm diameter area. Raman spectra were obtained in an 85–4000 cm−1 spectral region, with exposition time of 30 to 100 s for each scan, depending on signal intensity and a laser power of 2–10 mW to prevent sample disintegration.

4. Results

4.1. Critical Metallic Mineral Occurrence

SARGB-associated critical metal occurrences are divided into three types: skarn, skarn-greisen, and rare-metal Li-F granites.

4.1.1. Skarn and Skarn-Greisen Deposits and Occurrences

The first two types were described in detail earlier [20,21]. Their geology can be briefly described as follows. Skarn and skarn-greisen deposits and occurrences are located at the gently dipping southwestern SARGB exocontact, where the most differentiated rapakivi granites occur (Figure 2). The skarns were derived after Pitkäranta carbonate rocks, rimming remobilized Archean gneissose granite domes (Figure 2). Both lens-shaped and sheeted ore bodies occur. Skarn-greisen occurrences are either spatiously confined to Li-F-granite distribution areas or occur above their domes unexposed by erosion. Fe-Zn-Sn-Be mineralization is associated with them. The bulk of Be (up to 0.85%) is concentrated in vesuvianite [16]. The skarn deposits host Fe-Zn-Cu-Sn mineralization, in which tin of isomorphic form is abundant in garnet [14,15,34], reaching a concentration of about 3% [35]. The results of the Pb-isotopic systematics of PMD’s ores and igneous rocks [27,36,37] have shown that skarn deposits and SARGB granites have a common source of ore matter. Ore formation seems to have been split up into several stages. SARGB-related two-stage ore formation is supported by Sm-Nd mineral isochrones, 1558 ± 30 Ma and 1546 ± 28 Ma, obtained for tin-bearing skarns from the Kitelä deposit [16]. The formation of critical metallic minerals, mainly In, Be, and Bi, seems to be related to a second stage, at which rare-metal siderophyllitic and Li-F granites were involved.

In Mineralization

Indium mineralization is demonstrated by roquesite and In-bearing sphalerite [20,21]. In addition, unusual roquesite-galena association (intergrowths), micron-sized roquesite aggregates at the boundary of chalcopyrite and sphalerite grains and relatively high In concentrations in fluorite, magnetite and wittichenite, where In does not commonly occur, are noteworthy (see Supplementary Materials, Figures S1 and S2).

Bi Mineralization

Bismuth mineralization is demonstrated by a large group of minerals, in which native bismuth and wittichenite are most common and zavaritskite is least common [21]. Zavaritskite occurs in greisenized diopside skarns at W. Lupikko deposit (Figure 2). Xenomorphic zavaritskite aggregates measuring up to 60–80 µm are present in serpentinized diopside with pyrite-sphalerite mineralization (Figure 5a) and scarce fluorite grains (Figure 5b). Thread-like veinlets sometimes extend from its grains (Figure 5c). Zavaritskite-chalcopyrite intergrowths are occasionally encountered (Figure 5d). Zavaritskite has been found earlier [21] only as micron-sized rims evolving on hedleyite. In contrast to stechiometric composition, zavaritskite was found to contain Te and Pb impurities (Table 1).

Be Mineralization

Optical microscopy and X-ray diffraction methods have revealed over ten beryllium minerals in PMD’s greisenized skarns [19], of which helvite-group minerals, e.g., bertrandite and chrysoberyl, are most common. So far, only helvite and danalite have been subjected to chemical analysis [38]. Danalite and helvite often occur in W. Lupikko and Herbertz-1 ores (Figure 2), chrysoberyl at Arsenic Mine, bertrandite in mushketowitic ores from the Bek mine.
Helvite and danalite at W. Lupikko deposit occurs in fluoritized gahnite-phlogopite skarns together with magnetite and micron-sized uraninite and thorianite aggregates in phlogopite (Figure 6). Their reddish-brown crystals measuring 3 cm [39], are variably corroded by phlogopite, biotite, and fluorite (Figure 6 and Figure 7a,c) and contain an abundance of gahnite, biotite, and other minerals present as inclusions (Figure 7b). Helvite-group minerals from W. Lupikko and Herbertz-1 ores are mainly high-Fe varieties of danalite, while the rest of the ore is a helvite variety, as indicated by their chemical composition (see Supplementary Materials, Table S1).
Bertrandite in mushketowitic ores from the Bek mine occurs as idiomorphic long-prismatic and colorless to pale-greyish spear-like crystals making up radiate fan-shaped aggregates, only several millimeters in size (Figure 8). The crystals are present in quartz, which also contains iron-free sphalerite, chlorite, and magnetite. In addition to optical methods and microprobe analysis, Raman spectroscopy was used to identify bertrandite (see Supplementary Materials, Figure S3).

4.1.2. Li-F Granites

A.M. Larin [16] was the first to reliably document the presence of Li-F granites in SARGB. Three rare-metal occurrences are now known. Two of them, Muzilampi and Hepaoja, were discovered by the Karelian Geological Survey [40] and one, Avtodor, by the Institute of Geology, KarRC, RAS.

Muzilampi

The Muzilampi ore occurrence lies in the northwestern mildly eroded portion of the Ulälega Massif (Figure 1). It is located in a mineralized Li-F granite dome (600 × 800 m) controlled by ring and radial faults [40]. The occurrence was studied only in natural rock exposures, because cores from two holes drilled in the 1980s were lost. One core is described briefly below [40] along with Muzilampi granites.
The domal structure of the Muzilampi occurrence resembles a 5–7 m-high ring bank towering over the surrounding terrain and Muzisuo Mire. The dome consists of inequigranular (porphyraceous, pegmatoid) topaz-bearing siderophyllitic granites carrying elevated Li (0.01%–0.03%) and F (up to 0.2%–0.4%) contents. Microcline-perthite is replaced by albite. Albite-oligoclase is sericitiized and albitized. Two varieties of quartz, dark dipyramidal and light xenomorphic, occur. Biotite is scattered, occurring as glomerogranular aggregates, and is variably replaced by muscovite and chlorite. Associated with it are orthite, pyrochlore, rutile, apatite, tourmaline, titanite, magnetite, monazite and fluorite. Striated texture, provoked mainly by the variable abundance of quartz, is occasionally encountered. Albitized zones locally contain fluoritic breccia (fluorite makes up as much as 30% of rock volume) and kaolinite. In mineralized granites with elevated trace element contents (see Supplementary Materials, Table S2), rare-metal mineralization, often with coffinite and zircon, is confined to glomerogranular biotite-siderophyllite and fluorite clusters (Figure 9).
It occurs as a group of REE-minerals, such as bastnesite, parisitite, monazite, euxenite, aeshynite, haleniusite, fluocerite, pyrochlore (Figure 10), as well as Nb and Ta minerals (Figure 11). Most of the above mineral aggregates are less than 100 µm in size. Bastnesite is commonly concentrated in biotite, forming clusters of fine, closely-spaced grains (Figure 10a,f) or making up bigger aggregates in fluorite (Figure 10h). Fluorite is commonly full of micron-sized parisite inclusions (Figure 10e,g), and its pure varieties (Figure 10i) are rich in Y (1.2%–2.8%) and Sc (0.37%–0.93%). Haleniusite-parisite intergrowths in biotite aggregates occur (Figure 10d,e). Pyrochlore, occurring as xenomorphic poorly-defined grains, often together with columbite, bastnesite, and zircon, also occurs there (Figure 10b). Columbite is more common in other mineral associations with: (a) quartz and biotite (Figure 11a), (b) with fluorite and biotite (Figure 11b), and (c) aeschynite, parisite and fluorite (Figure 11c,d) with bastnesite and biotite (Figure 11d). Spongy-textured columbite is genetically interesting and important (Figure 11b). The chemical composition of the above minerals, primarily euxenite-, aeschynite-, columbite- and tantalite-group minerals, is also essential.
Euxenite- and aeschynite-group minerals are difficult to identify due to their variable composition, isomorphism, and metasomatic alterations [41,42]. The composition of these minerals from the Muzilampi occurrence displays considerable variations in Ti, Fe, Ta, and Th concentrations (Table 2), making them hard to identify reliably.
Columbite- and tantalite-group minerals are more persistent in composition (Table 3). All analyses are consistent with ferricolumbite carrying low tantalum and manganese contents, presumably because the samples analyzed were all taken from natural rock exposures typical of only one level of upward differentiation in granites.
Muzilampi granites locally contain accessory ilmenorutile (up to 8% Nb, 0.37%–0.72% In). Forecast resources for the Muzilampi deposit to a depth of 100 m are estimated at 30,000 t Ta2O5, and the average Ta2O5 is 0.03% [40].

Hepaoja

The occurrence of Hepaoja ore appears in the western endocontact zone of the Salmi Massif, near the southeastern end of the Lupikko gneissose granite dome (Figure 1 and Figure 2). At Hepaoja, the Karelian Geological Survey has revealed elevated Nb2O5 (0.008%–0.05%) and Ta2O5 (0.003%–0.015%) contents in albitized and greisenized granites [40]. No drilling has been performed there.
Field work at Hepaoja natural exposures has exposed the apical portion of a stock-like rare-metal granite body made up of greisenized topaz-bearing siderophyllitic granites and stockscheider with elevated trace element contents (see Supplementary Materials, Table S3).
Rare-earth mineralization (bastnesite, parisite, monazite, aeschynite, euxinite, samarskite, and sahamalite) is associated with quartz, muscovite, and albite, less commonly with fluorite, biotite, kaolinite, and K-feldspar (Figure 12). Parisite occurs as laminae, up to 1 mm in size, in quartz-muscovite aggregates (Figure 12b) and as micron-sized inclusions together with bastnesite in fluorite (Figure 12a). The fluorite is less saturated with inclusions than Muzilampi fluorite. Aeschynite, euxenite, and samarskite occur as micron-sized inclusions in biotite. Their chemical composition is too complex (see Supplementary Materials, Table S4) to reliably identify these minerals using the methods proposed [41,42,43]. Bastnesite as the most common rare-earth mineral in Hepaoja granites contains minor Ca and Y impurities, and some analyses show the presence of Pm, Eu, Gd, and Th (Table 4).
Prismatic columbite aggregates, measuring up to 200 µm, are present in biotite, quartz (Figure 13a,b), and feldspars (Figure 13d). Zonal crystals, in which Ta concentration is highly variable, occur (Figure 13c). Compositionally, both Hepaoja and Muzilampi columbites are interpreted as ferricolumbites, but Hepaoja columbite has higher Ta contents and, hence, higher Ta/(Ta + Nb) ratios (Table 5). It typically displays greater variations in W and occasionally high Sc2O3 contents (up to 0.4%).

Avtodor

Avtodor ore occurrence lies in the northeastern Lupikko gneissose granite dome (Figure 2). It is confined to a morphologically complex stock-like Li-F granite body exposed by a crushed stone quarry. The quarry walls show the following zonal structure of the body (from the base upwards): fine-grained leucogranites—striated-textured topaz-bearing leucogranites—greisenized topaz-bearing granites—a fluoritic breccia zone—stockscheider. Zones from greisenized granites upwards are most markedly mineralized (rare-earth minerals, columbite, ilmenorutile, Nb-rutile, molybdenite, wolframite and bismuth). The zones vary greatly in thickness (0–3 to 20–30 m) and morphology. The lateral contacts of the granite body are eruptive, forming compositionally complex breccias containing fluorite-rare-earth mineralization (Figure 14).
Monazite, xenotime, bastnesite, and synchysite are major rare-earth minerals at the Avtodor occurrence. In the greisenized topaz-bearing granite zone, monazite and xenotime are associated with topaz, fluorite, biotite, and molybdenite (Figure 15a–e), often forming intergrowths. Stetendite is scarce (Figure 15i). Bastnesite and synchysite occur jointly in the above zone (Figure 15f–h) and in fluoritic breccias and stockscheider zones (Figure 16c,f). Synchysite commonly evolves after bastnesite. In the fluoritic breccias and stockscheider zones, monazite and xenotime forms both idiomorphic zonal crystals (Figure 16b,d) and xenomorphic grains (Figure 16a). Monazite is overgrown with synchysite and hollandite rims (Table 6; Figure 16e). Avtodor rare-earth minerals are similar in chemistry to those of the Hepaoja occurrence (see Supplementary Materials, Tables S5 and S6). Hepaoja fluorite from the breccia zone is comparable in REE (up to 0.7% Y, up to 2.4% Nd) and Sc (дo 0.6%) contents to Muzilampi fluorite.
Ta-Nb mineralization is poorly developed and occurs mainly as micron-sized (<10 µm) ferricolumbite, ilmenorutile, and Nb-bearing rutile grains. These minerals are sometimes intergrown in topaz replaced by micron-sized kaolinite veinlets (Figure 17a,b). Ilmenorutile and Nb-rutile in the intergrowths are, in turn, closely intergrown. Isolated Nb-rutile aggregates occur together with pyrite in chlorite (Figure 17c). The main difference of Avtodor ferricolumbite from ferricolumbite in other occurrences is its higher Mn contents and higher Mn/(Mn + Fe) ratios (Table 7). It is similar in Ta2O5 contents (<15%) to ilmenorutile with which it is intergrown (Table 7).

5. Discussion

5.1. Formation of Roquesite

The analysis of data on In contents in the various minerals of PMD’s skarn ores and roquesite distribution in them (see Supplementary Materials, Figures S1 and S2) [20,21] reveals something new in the indium formation pattern. Roquesite seems to have been formed due to the release of indium upon the disintegration of its solid solutions in chalcopyrite, sphalerite and, presumably, galena. Micron-sized roquesite aggregates, formed along the boundaries of sphalerite grains present in chalcopyrite (see Supplementary Materials, Figure S2), seem to provide evidence for its formation by the diffusion of In from sphalerite upon a hydrothermal-temperature effect on the ores triggered by SARGB’s late intrusive phases. This formation pattern of roquesite is similar to the mechanism of removal of invisible gold from arsenopyrite’s crystalline lattice, which provoked the formation of independent aggregates upon a rise in temperature [44]. Experimental data [45] and the study of In-bearing base-metal mineralization in Kumi greisens from Vyborg rapakivi batholiths in southern Finland [46] suggest that In could have penetrated isomorphically into galena. Upon further alteration of galena, In may have been released from it, binding in its own mineral—roquesite. This is how roquesite, intergrown with galena, seems to have been derived from propylitized skarns from Valkealampi Mine and the Kitelä deposit (see Supplementary Materials, Figure S2).

5.2. Formation of Zavaritskite

To better understand the origin of zavaritskite, more zavaritskite samples from PMD’s skarn ores are needed. Zavaritskite BiOF is a rare mineral discovered in the Sherlovaya Gora rare-metal deposit in quartz-siderophyllitic greisen located in the eastern Trans-Baikal region [47]. It is now known to occur in skarns [48,49,50], hydrothermal veins in granites [51,52], pegmatites [53,54], and greisens [55,56]. Zavaritskite is assumed to have been formed either hypogenically [12,51,57] or hypergenically [47,56,58]. Geochemical bonding between Bi and F has been described from many ore fields associated with granitoid magmatism [48,51,53]. The main argument in favor of the hypergenic formation of zavaritskite is provided by its late evolution, the replacement of native bismuth, and the formation of zonal (from the center towards the margin) bismuth-zavaritskite-bismite aggregates [58]. This replacement is simultaneous with the hypergenic alteration of other minerals. In PMD’s ores, zavaritskite occurs only in greisenized skarns, forming micron-sized rims around native bismuth and hedleyite grains [35] or independent aggregates in highly altered (serpentine) phlogopite-diopside skarns often intergrown with chalcopyrite (Figure 5). Associated with it in both cases are sulphides (pyrite, sphalerite) unaffected by oxidation. Thus, zavaritskite in PMD skarn ores was most probably derived hypogenically at the final stages of the greysen alteration of skarns. Microprobe chemical analyses of zavaritskite are readily recalculated using its formula, in spite of relatively high Te and Pb concentrations in some of them (Table 1). Hence, further studies are needed, because such impurity contents in zavaritskite have not been reported earlier in scientific publications.

5.3. Formation of Helvite-Group Minerals

Helvite-group minerals in PMD’s skarn ores occur selectively only at W. Lupikko and Herbertz-1 in greisenized skarns with abundant fluorite and magnetite. The unusual composition of minerals in this group (Mn,Fe,Zn)4(Be3Si3O12)S, combining metal orthosilicate and sulphide, is responsible for their high sensitivity to changes in the fugacities of O2 and S2, the activity of phenacite, and the alkalinity of the system [59,60,61,62]. These factors are responsible for the narrow stability field of helvite-group minerals within the above parameters. This applies particularly to danalite [59]. The composition of helvite-group minerals is also strongly controlled by the composition of the host medium [60,63]. Hence, considerable variations in the composition of helvite-group minerals PMD’s ores (Figure 18) indicate a difference in the conditions of their formation.
The prevalence of danalite over helvite and the absence of genthelvite in the samples analyzed suggest the limited volatility of oxygen and sulphur, low alkalinity and the external supply of Fe into the hydrothermal system conducive to danalite stability [64,65]. Furthermore, a helvite-group mineral association in W. Lupikko skarns with zinc-enriched spinel (ZnO 22%–25%) (Figure 6) seems to have been one of the factors preventing genthelvite formation.

5.4. Formation of Critical Metals Mineralization in Li-F Granites

The Muzilampi, Hepaoja, and Avtodor rare-metal occurrences display both similarities and differences. They are all genetically related to well-developed SARGB rare-metal granites, which were the last to intrude. Avtodor granites exhibit some geological (distinctive vertical structure), petrographic (layering, striated textures, and stockscheider) and mineralogo-geochemical (abundant topaz, fluorite and protolithionite) features of Li-F granites, while Muzilampi and Hepaoja granites show none of these features. Therefore, they cannot be studied over a great depth. However, some of the characteristics of these granites, described in Section 4 of the present paper, make it possible to tentatively interpret them as Li-F granites, although stronger arguments are needed.
The biotite of Muzilampi granites, similar in composition to Li-siderophyllite and protolithionite, contains high Nb, Ta and REE contents (Table 8). Such high Nb contents in biotite mica, in comparison with the data of Z. Zhu et al. [66], are the highest of those ever reported for mica from granites. Another distinctive feature is the high saturation (>50%) of fluorite in Muzilampi granites with micron-sized synchysite and parisite inclusions (Figure 10e,g). The same features are displayed by fluorite from Avtodor granites (Figure 14) and, to a lesser extent, by Hepaoja fluorite (Figure 12a). Petrographic data show that in all of the above cases fluorite is the latest primary mineral in granites, forming interstices between their major minerals: K-feldspar, oligoclase-albite, biotite, and quartz.
Hence, at the final stage of granitic melt crystallization, it was probably oversaturated with fluorine, including REE’s fluorine complexes. High F activity continued to dominate at the postmagmatic stage of mineral formation, as indicated by the formation of high-fluorine mineral phases (haleniusite, fluocerite) (Figure 10d,e), the F-bearing minerals of REE (parisite, synchysite ) and the overgrowing of primary Y-bearing fluorite with sterile fluorite rims (Figure 10i). Synchysite is formed even at the latest low-temperature stages of ore mineral formation, encrusting the walls of hollandite-filled micromiaroles (Figure 16a) and, together with the same mineral, evolving as micron-sized rims on monazite (Figure 16e). Cerianite and stetendite seem to have been formed almost simultaneously (Figure 15i), indicating highly oxidative conditions in the mineral-forming system [67].
Muzilampi and Hepaoja granites contain an abundance of aeschynite- and euxenite-group minerals, which are difficult to identify and interpret genetically. These problems were discussed in detail in [41,42]. The grain morphology of these minerals, present in veinlet-like fluorite aggregates (Figure 10a and Figure 12c) and their composition variation trends on the diagram (Figure 19), proposed by T.S Ercit [41], suggest their postmagmatic formation and substantial alterations at a hydrothermal stage. This seems to be the reason for the ambiguous identification of the above minerals based on the diagram (Figure 19) and the criteria proposed by Ewing [43].
Columbite-tantalite-group minerals in all the above occurrences are ferricolumbites (Figure 20). Interestingly, Muzilampi and Hepaoja columbites are rich in Fe. Their Mn/(Mn + Fe) ratio is <0.2 (Figure 20). Ta/(Ta + Nb) ratio in Muzilampi and Hepaoja ferricolumbites varies from 0 to 0.4. In the diagram (Figure 20), it forms an almost vertical trend closely coincident with the columbite composition field of the carbonatite complex. Biotite and siderophyllite in the granites contain maximum Fe concentrations: Fe/(Fe + Mg) = 1. Other dark-colored minerals (amphibole, pyroxene, and fayalite) occurring in SARGB granitoids are also rich in Fe. This distinctive feature of rapakivi magmatism seems to persist at a postmagmatic stage upon the formation of ore associations.
Avtodor columbites contain less Fe, but the number of their analyses is too small to draw any conclusions about the evolution of their composition. The morphology of ferricolumbite aggregates, the degree of idiomorphism, zoning, and intergrowing with various minerals do not provide sufficient evidence for their magmatic or hydrothermal origin. However, the presence of spongy-textured columbite in Muzilampi granites due to regularly distributed micron-sized fluorite inclusions in it (Figure 11b) suggests that it was derived from fluorine-enriched fluids or fluidized melts. The possible transportation of Ta and Nb by F-rich solutions is supported by experimental data and the results of the study of molten and liquid inclusions [69,70,71,72].
The formation of columbite-tantalite-group minerals is the subject of long debate. Some workers support their magmatic origin [73,74], others advocate a hydrothermal origin [75,76], and some [77,78,79] find both options agreeable. It has been shown [80] that columbite of magmatic origin contains more Nb, Sc, Fe, Ti, Y, Zr, U, Th, and W. Hence, an abundance of ferricolumbites in SARGB’s rare-metal granites has been derived magmatically. Few ferricolumbites with spongy structure in the studied granites are hydrothermal, others are probably of igneous origin.

6. Conclusions

1. Critical metal mineralization in the late-stage intrusions of the Salmi Batholith consists of In-Bi-Be in greisenized skarns and REE-Ta-Nb minerals in Li-F granites.
2. In addition to Zn, Cu, and Fe sulphides, magnetite and fluorite are In-concentrating minerals in greisenized skarns. Roquesite, an In mineral, was produced by the exsolution of its solid solutions in chalcopyrite, sphalerite, and, presumably, galena. In diffusion from sphalerite upon a thermal effect seems to have triggered the formation of its micron-sized aggregates at the boundary of contacting sphalerite and chalcopyrite grains.
3. Bismuth mineralization occurs as a large group of minerals, in which native bismuth and wittichenite are most common and zavaritskite least common. In PMD ores, hypogenically derived zavaritskite is associated with sulphides, which have not been oxidized.
4. PMD’s greisenized skarns display over ten beryllium mineral phases; danalite, bertrandite, and chrysoberyl are most common. The predominant occurrence of danalite above helvite and the absence of genthelvite in the samples analyzed suggest limited oxygen and sulphur fugacity, low alkalinity and the external supply of Fe upon its formation. A helvite-group mineral association with zinc-enriched spinel (ZnO 22%–25%) seems to have been one of the factors preventing genthelvite formation.
5. The Muzilampi, Hepaoja, and Avtodor ore occurrences in SARGB’s well-developed rare-metal granites, which were the last to intrude, display similar REE and Nb-Ta mineralization. The granites cannot be studied at depth, hence more arguments are needed for interpreting Muzilampi and Hepaoja granites as Li-F-type granites.
6. Major REE minerals in the above occurrences are bastnesite, synchisite, parisite, monazite, xenotime, aeschynite, euxenite, Nb-Ta—ferricolumbite, ilmenorutile, and Nb-rutile. They are commonly associated with fluorite and Li-siderophyllite, which contains high Nb contents (0.25%–0.78%) in Musilampi granites.
7. Fluorite-1 (interstitional), present in all three occurrences and overfilled (to >50%) with synchisite and parisite micron-sized inclusions, indicates the oversaturation of REE granitic melt with F and F-complexes at the final stage of its crystallization. High F activity persisted at the postmagmatic stage of mineral formation, triggering the formation of fluorite-2 and the high-F mineral phases of REE (håleniusite, fluocerite).
8. Columbite-tantalite-group minerals at all the occurrences discussed are all ferricolumbites with dominant Mn/(Mn + Fe) ratio of <0.2. Biotite and siderophyllite associated with them commonly exhibit a maximum Fe concentration, Fe/(Fe + Mg) = 1. This distinctive feature (high Fe concentration), typical of rapakivi magmatism, persists at a postmagmatic stage upon the formation of ore associations.
9. Unambiguous conclusions regarding their magmatic or hydrothermal origin cannot be drawn on the basis of the morphology of ferricolumbite aggregates, the degree of idiomorphism, zoning, and encrusting on various minerals. However, the presence of spongy-textured columbite in Muzilampi granites due to its evenly distributed fluorite micron-sized inclusions suggests that it was derived from fluorine-enriched fluids.
10. Only indium mineralization, associated with bismuth and beryllium mineralization, for which forecast resources have been estimated, could be of economic significance, based on our knowledge of the mineralization of critical metals [21].

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/min13050648/s1, Figure S1: Roquesite mineralization in skarn-greisen ores, at the boundary of sphalerite and chalcopyrite grains; Figure S2: Indium concentrations in ore minerals from skarn and skarn-greisen deposits and occurrences related genetically to Salmi anorthosite-rapakivi granite batholite granites (LA ICP MS microanalysis); Figure S3: Raman spectra of bertrandite in a 300–1400 cm−1 spectrum range; Table S1: Representative electron microanalyses and atomic proportions of danalite (L1–L15, P3) and helvine (P1, P2); Tadle S2: Trace elements composition of granite occurrence Muzilampi (ICP MS analysis) Table S3: Trace elements composition of granite occurrence Hepaoja (ICP MS analysis).; Table S4: Representative electron microanalyses and atomic proportions of aeschynite (H1, H3), euxenite (H2, H4, H5, H7–H9) and samarskite (H6, H10) occurrence Hepaoja; Table S5: Representative electron microanalyses and atomic proportions of xenotime occurrence Avtodor; Table S6. Representative electron microanalyses and atomic proportions of parasite (Av1, Av2) and synchysite occurence Avtodor.

Funding

This research was funded by state assignment to the Institute of Geology Karelian Research Centre RAS.

Data Availability Statement

All data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank A. Ternovoy for their assistance during the microprobe work, and by A. Paramonov during the acquisition of LA-ICP-MS data. I am grateful to the reviewers for numerous helpful comments and recommendations that helped to improve this paper. I wish also to thank G. Sokolov for her English corrections.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bowles, J.F.W.; Cook, N.J.; Sundblad, K.; Jonsson, E.; Deady, E.; Hughes, H.S.R. Introduction—Special issue on critical raw materials: Critical-metal mineralogy and ore genesis: Contributions from the European Mineralogical Conference held in Rimini, September 2016. Mineral. Mag. 2018, 82 (Suppl. S1), S1–S4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mudd, G.M.; Jowitt, S.M.; Werner, T.T. The world’s by-product and critical metal resources part I: Uncertainties, current reporting practices, implications and grounds for optimism. Ore Geol. Rev. 2017, 86, 924–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Werner, T.T.; Mudd, G.M.; Jowitt, S.M. The world’s by-product and critical metal resources part II: A method for quantifying the resources of rarely reported metals. Ore Geol. Rev. 2017, 80, 658–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Werner, T.T.; Mudd, G.M.; Jowitt, S.M. The world’s by-product and critical metal resources part III: A global assessment of indium. Ore Geol. Rev. 2017, 86, 939–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, 2020—Critical Raw Materials Resilience: Charting a Path towards Greater Security and Sustainability; 3.9.2020 COM 474 final; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2020.
  6. Eilu, P.; Bjerkgård, T.; Franzson, H.; Gautneb, H.; Häkkinen, T.; Jonsson, E.; Keiding, J.K.; Pokki, J.; Raaness, A.; Reginiussen, H.; et al. The Nordic Supply Potential of Critical Metals and Minerals for a Green Energy Transition; Nordic Innovation Report; Nordic Innovation: Oslo, Norway, 2021; ISBN 978-82-8277-115-3. Available online: https://www.nordicinnovation.org/2021/nordic-supply-potential-critical-metals-and-minerals-greenenergy-transition (accessed on 20 September 2021.).
  7. Mackay, D.A.R.; Simandl, G.J. Geology, market and supply chain of niobium and tantalum—A review. Miner. Depos. 2014, 49, 1025–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Blengini, G.A.; Latunussa, C.E.L.; Eynard, U.; Torres de Matos, C.; Wittmer, D.; Georgitzikis, K.; Pavel, C.; Carrara, S.; Mancini, L.; Unguru, M.; et al. Study on the EU’s List of Critical Raw Materials; Final Report; EU Publication Office: Luxembourg, 2020; 152p. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dostal, J.; Gerel, O. Occurrences of Niobium and Tantalum Mineralization in Mongolia. Minerals 2022, 12, 1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. List of the Main Types of Strategic Mineral Raw Materials. Approved by Order of the Government of the Russian Federation dated August 30, 2022 No. 2473-r. Available online: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/405118925/ (accessed on 3 September 2022).
  11. Bortnikov, N.S.; Volkov, A.V.; Galyamov, A.L.; Vikentyev, I.V.; Aristov, V.V.; Lalomov, A.V.; Murashov, K.Y. Mineral resources of high-tech metals in Russia: State of the art and outlook. Geol. Ore Deposits 2016, 58, 83–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ivashchenko, V.I. Main types of rare_metal mineralization in Karelia. Geol. Ore Deposits. 2016, 58, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Trüstedt, O. Die Erzlagerstätten von Pitkäranta am Ladoga-See: Helsingfors, Frenckellska tryckeriaktiebolaget. Bull. Commision Géologique Finl. 1907, 19, 333. [Google Scholar]
  14. Khazov, R.A. Geological Characteristics of Tin Mineralization in the Northern Ladoga Lake Area; Nauka: St. Petersburg, Russia, 1973; p. 87. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  15. Ivashchenko, V.I. Skarn Mineralization of Tin and Tungsten in the Southern Baltic Shield: Mineralogy, Petrography and Genesis; Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 1987; p. 240. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  16. Larin, A.M. Rapakivi Granites and Associated Rocks; Nauka: St. Petersburg, Russia, 2011; p. 402. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  17. Amelin, Y.; Beljaev, A.; Larin, A.; Stepanov, K. Salmi Batholith and Pitkäranta Ore Field in Soviet Karelia; Haapala, I., Ramo, O.T., Salonsaari, P.T., Eds.; Geological Survey of Finland: Espoo, Finland, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  18. Priyatkina, N.; Khudoley, A.K.; Ustinov, V.N.; Kullerud, K. 1.92 Ga kimberlitic rocks from Kimozero, NW Russia: Their geochemistry, tectonic setting and unusual field occurrence. Precambrian Res. 2014, 249, 162–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nefedov, E.I. Mineralogy of the Pitkäranta Deposit: Metal Potential and Mineralogy of Skarnoids in South Karelia and in the Western Kola Peninsula; VSEGEI: St. Petersburg, Russia, 1973; p. 326. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  20. Ivashchenko, V.I. Rare-Metal (In, Bi, Te, Se, Be) Mineralization of Skarn Ores in the Pitkäranta Mining District, Ladoga Karelia Russia. Minerals 2021, 11, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ivashchenko, V.I. Geology, geochemistry and mineralogy of indium resources at Pitkäranta Mining District, Ladoga Karelia, Russia. J. Geochem. Explor. 2022, 240, 107046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nironen, M. The Svecofennian Orogen: A tectonic model. Precambrian Res. 1997, 86, 21–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Alexeyev, I.A.; Amantov, A.V.; Amantova, M.G.; Babichev, A.V.; Baltybaev, S.K.; Bugayenko, I.V.; Voinov, A.S.; Golubtsova, N.S.; Ivashchenko, V.I.; Zhamaletdinov, A.A.; et al. Proterozoic Ladoga Structure: Geology, Deep Structure and Minerageny; Sharov, N.V., Ed.; KarRC RAS: Petrozavodsk, Russia, 2019; p. 435. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  24. Eskola, P. Around Pitkäranta. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Geol. Geogr. 1951, 3, 90. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sudovikov, N.G. Problems in Rapakivi and Late Orogenic Intrusions; Nauka Press: Moscow, Russia, 1967; p. 118. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  26. Grigoryeva, L.V.; Shinkarev, N.F. Conditions of formation of domal structures in the Trans-Ladoga region. Izv. AN SSSR Ser. Geol. 1981, 3, 41–51. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  27. Neymark, L.A.; Amelin, Y.V.; Larin, A.M. Pb-Nd-Sr isotopic and geochemical constraints on the origin of the 1.54-1.56 Ga Salmi rapakivi granite-anorthosite batholith (Karelia, Russia). Mineral. Petrol. 1994, 50, 173–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ramo, O.T.; Manttari, I.; Vaasjoki, M.; Upton, B.G.J.; Sviridenko, L.P. Age and signifi cance of Mesoproterozoic CFB magmatism, Lake Ladoga region, NW Russia. Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. Programs 2001, 33, 6. [Google Scholar]
  29. Dukhovsky, A.A.; Artamonova, N.A.; Ivanova, E.I.; Nikoforov, I.O. 3D model of the Salmi rapakivi granite massif and the distribution pattern of mineralization. Reg. Geol. Metallog. 1994, 4, 24–32. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  30. Konyshev, A.A.; Alferyeva, Y.O.; Anosova, M.O.; Rusak, A.A.; Korepanov, Y.I. Composition of mic from Salmi Batholite granites as an indicator of Nb–Ta mineralization. Mosc. Univ. Geol. Bull. 2019, 74, 401–411. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Konyshev, A.A.; Chevychelov, V.Y.; Shapovalov, Y.B. Two types of highly differentiated topaz-bearing granites of the Salmi Batholite, South Karelia. Geokhimia 2020, 65, 14–30. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  32. Zaraisky, G.P.; Aksyuk, A.M.; Devyatova, V.N.; Udoratina, O.V.; Chevychelov, V.Y. The Zr/Hf ratio as a fractionation indicator of rare-metal granites. Petrologiya 2009, 17, 28–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Svetov, S.A.; Stepanova, A.V.; Chazhengina, S.Y.; Svetova, E.N.; Mikhailova, A.I.; Rybnikova, Z.P.; Paramonov, A.S.; Utitsina, V.L.; Kolodei, V.S.; Ekhova, M.V. Precise ICP-MS and LA-ICP-MS analysis of rock and mineral composition: Technique application and assessment of accuracy of the obtained results on the example of early Precambrian mafic complexes. Tr. Karel. Nauchnogo Tsentra Ross. Akad. Nauk. 2015, 7, 54–73. [Google Scholar]
  34. Larin, A.M.; Amelin, Y.V.; Neymark, L.A. Age and genesis of complex skarn ores in the Pitk¨aranta Ore Province. Geol. Rudn. Mestorozhdeniy 1991, 6, 15–33. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  35. Ivashchenko, V.I. Mineralogo-geochemical signs of the ore specialization of skarns from the Pitkäranta Ore Province (South Karelia, Russia) for rare and noble metals. Zap. RMO 2016, 2, 74–95. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  36. Larin, A.M.; Neymark, L.A.; Gorokhovsky, B.M.; Ovchinnikova, G.V. Relationship of complex skarn mineralization in the Pitkäranta Districy with rapakivi granites of the Salmi massif: Pb-isotope data. Izv. AN SSSR Ser. Geol. 1990, 5, 47–57. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  37. Sundblad, K. Lead isotopic evidence for the orgin of 1.8-1.4 Ga ores and granitoids in the southeastern part of the Fennoscandian shield. Precambrian Res. 1991, 51, 265–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pekov, I.V.; Vlasov, E.A.; Gerasimova, E.I. Pitkäranta Practical Mineralogy Course; Max Press: Moscow, Russia, 2008; p. 60. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  39. Andreyeva, I.P.; Samsonova, N.N. Pitkäranta Ore Province: The Background. In History of the Museum and Its Collections; Vernadsky State Geological Museum RAS: Moscow, Russia, 2019; pp. 97–112. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  40. Mikhailov, V.P.; Aminov, V.N. (Eds.) Republic of Karelia’s Mineral Potential; Karelia: Petrozavodsk, Russia, 2005; V. 1. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  41. Ercit, T.S. Identification and alteration trends of granitic-pegmatite-hosted (Y, REE, U, Th)–(Nb, Ta, Ti) oxide minerals: A statistical approach. Can. Mineral. 2005, 43, 1291–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Szuszkiewicz, A.; Pieczka, A.; Szeł, E.G.E.; Turniak, K.; Ilnicki, S.; Nejbert, K. The euxenite-group minerals and products of their alteration in the hybrid Julianna granitic pegmatite, Piława Go`rna, Sudetes, Southwestern Poland. Can. Mineral. 2016, 54, 879–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ewing, R.C. Mineralogy of Metamict Rare Earth AB2O6-Type Niobium—Tantalum—Titanium Oxides. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  44. Tomkins, A.G.; Mavrogenes, J.A. Redistribution of Gold within Arsenopyrite and Löllingite during Pro- and Retrograde Metamorphism: Application to timing of Mineralization. Econ. Geol. 2001, 96, 525–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kissin, S.A. An investigation of the solubility of indium in hydrothermally synthesized galena and sphalerite. Can. Mineral. 1972, 11, 575. [Google Scholar]
  46. Al-Ani, T.; Ahtola, T.; Kuusela, J.; Al-Ansari, N. Mineralogical and petrographic characteristics of indium and REE-bearing accessory phases in the kymi granite stock, Southern Finland. Nat. Resour. 2018, 9, 23–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dolomanova, E.I.; Senderova, V.M.; Yanchenko, M.T. Zavaritskite (BiOF)—A new oxyfluoride-group mineral. DAN SSSR 1962, 146, 680–682. [Google Scholar]
  48. Ivashchenko, V.I.; Valkama, M.; Sundblad, K.; Golubev, A.I.; Alexeyev, V.Y. New data on the mineralogy and metallogeny of skarns in the Pitkäranta Ore Province. Dokl. RAN 2011, 440, 229–233. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  49. Kolitsch, U.; Rieck, B.; Voudouris, P. Mineralogy and genesis of the Lavrion ore deposit: New insights from the study of ore and accessory minerals. Mitt. Osterr. Mineral Ges. 2015, 161, 66. [Google Scholar]
  50. Yatimov, U.A.; Belogub, E.V.; Shilovskikh, V.V.; Blinov, I.A. Zavaritskite from sulphide-magnetite ores at the Aktash skarn deposit, West Karamazar, Northern Tadjikistan. Zap. RMO 2021, 1, 92–100. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  51. Alexeyev, V.I.; Marin, Y.B. Composition and evolution of the accessory mineralization of Far Eastern Russia’s lithium-fluorine granites as indicators of their ore potential. Zap. RMO 2014, 6, 1–16. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  52. Auer, C. Die Mineralien der Wolfsgrubebei Seizim Liesingtal. Der Steir. Miner. 2019, 34, 5–11. [Google Scholar]
  53. Voloshin, A.V.; Pakhomovsky, Y.A. Minerals and the Evolution of Mineral Formation in the Kola Peninsula’s Amazonitic pegmatites L.; Nauka Press: Saint Petersburg, Russia, 1986; 168p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  54. Ferretti, P.; Camin, C.; Fassina, B.; Gentile, P.; Rocchetti, I.; Vecchi, F. Miniera Tingherla (Frassilongo, Valle del Fersina): Aggiornamento di una localita classica della mineralogia trentina. Riv. Mineral. Ital. 2018, 42, 108–141. [Google Scholar]
  55. Rankin, J.; Lawrence, L.J.; Sharpe, J.L.; Williams, P.A. Rare secondary bismuth, tungsten and molybdenum minerals from Elsmore, New England district of New South Wales. Aust. J. Miner. 2002, 8, 55–60. [Google Scholar]
  56. Sejkora, J.; Ondruš, P.; Fikar, M.; Veselovsky, F.; Mach, Z.; Gabašova, A.; Skoda, R.; Beran, P. Supergene minerals at the Huber stock and Schnod stock deposits, Krasno ore District, the Slavkovsky les area, Czech Republic. J. Czech Geol. Soc. 2006, 51, 57–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ondruš, P.; Veselovsky, F.; Gabašova, A.; Hloušek, J.; Šrein, V.; Vavrin, I.; Skala, R.; Sejkora, J.; Drabek, M. Primary minerals of the Jachymov ore district. J. Czech Geol. Soc. 2003, 48, 19–147. [Google Scholar]
  58. Sejkora, J.; Pauliš, P.; Gramblička, R.; Malíková, R.; Pour, O.; Dolníček, Z.; Ulmanová, J.; Vrtiška, L. The recently found Bi-Co-Ni-As-U-V mineralization of the Přísečnice ore district, Krušné hory Mountains (Czech Republic). Bull. Miner. Petrolog. 2019, 27, 1. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
  59. Burt, D.M. The stability of danalite, Fe4Be3(SiO4)3S. Am. Mineral. 1980, 65, 355–360. [Google Scholar]
  60. Burt, D.M. Stability of genthelvite, Zn3Be3(SiO4)3S: An exercise in chalcophilicity using exchange operators. Am. Mineral. 1988, 73, 1384–1394. [Google Scholar]
  61. Barton, M.D.; Young, S. Non-pegmatitic deposits of beryllium: Mineralogy, geology, phase equilibria and origin. Grew, E.S., Ed; Beryllium: Mineralogy, petrology and geochemistry. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 2002, 50, 591–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bilal, E.; Fonteilles, M. Conditions d’apparition respectives de l’helvite, de la phénacite et du béryl dans l’environnement granitique: Exemple du massif de Sucuri (Brésil). C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris. 1988, 307, 273–276. [Google Scholar]
  63. Zito, G.; Hanson, S.L. Genthelvite overgrowths on danalite cores from a pegmatite miarolitic cavity in Cheyenne Canyon, El Paso County, Colorado. Can. Mineral. 2017, 55, 195–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Robie, R.A.; Hemingway, B.S.; Fisher, J.R. Thermodynamic Properties of Minerals and Related Substances at 298.15 K and 1 Bar (105 Pascals) Pressure and at Higher Temperatures. Geol. Surv. Bull. 1979, 1452, 456p. [Google Scholar]
  65. Fursenko, D.A. Conditions of Synthesis of Helvite-Group Minerals; Nauka Siberian Branch: Novosibirsk, Russia, 1989; 76p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  66. Zhu, Z.; Wang, R.; Marignac, C.; Cuney, M.; Mercadier, J.; Che, X.; Lespinasse, M.-Y. A new style of rare metal granite with Nb-rich mica: The Early Cretaceous Huangshan rare-metal granite suite, northeast Jiangxi Province, southeast China. Am. Mineral. 2018, 103, 1530–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hurai, V.; Huraiová, M.; Konečný, P. REE Minerals as Geochemical Proxies of Late-Tertiary Alkalic Silicate ± Carbonatite Intrusions Beneath Carpathian Back-Arc Basin. Minerals 2021, 11, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Cĕrný, P.; Ercit, T.S. Some recent advances in the mineralogy and geochemistry of Nb and Ta in rare-elemen granitic pegmatites. Bull. Minéral. 1985, 108, 499–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zaraisky, G.P.; Korzhinskaya, V.; Kotova, N. Experimental studies of Ta2O5 and columbite-tantalite solubility in fluoride solutions from 300 to 550 °C and 50 to 100 MPa. Mineral. Petrol. 2010, 99, 287–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Timofeev, A.; Migdisov, A.A.; Williams-Jones, A.E. An experimental study of the solubility and speciation of niobium in fluoride-bearing aqueous solutions at elevated temperature. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2015, 158, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Timofeev, A.; Migdisov, A.A.; Williams-Jones, A.E. An experimental study of the solubility and speciation of tantalum in fluoride-bearing aqueous solutions at elevated temperature. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2017, 197, 294–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wu, M.Q.; Samson, I.M.; Zhang, D.H. Textural and chemical constraints on the formation of disseminated granite-hosted W-Ta-Nb mineralization at the Dajishan deposit, Nanling Range, southeastern China. Econ. Geol. 2017, 112, 855–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Breiter, K.; Škoda, R.; Uher, P. Nb-Ta-Ti-W-Sn-oxide minerals as indicators of a peraluminous P- and F-rich granitic system evolution: Podlesí, Czech Republic. Mineral. Petrol. 2007, 91, 225–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Chudík, P.; Uher, P.; Kohút, M.; Bačík, P. Accessory columbite to tantalite, tapiolite and zircon: Products of extreme fractionation in highly peraluminous pegmatitic granite from the Považský Inovec Mountains, Western Carpathians, Slovakia. J. Geosci. 2008, 53, 323–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Raimbault, L.; Cuney, M.; Azencott, C.; Duthou, J.L.; Joron, J.L. Geochemical evidence for a multistage magmatic genesis of Ta-Sn-Li mineralization in the granite at Beauvoir, French Massif Central. Econ. Geol. 1995, 90, 548–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Reyf, F.G.; Seltmann, R.; Zaraisky, G.P. The role of magmatic processes in the formation of banded Li, F-enriched granites from the Orlovka tantalum deposit, Transbaikalia, Russia: Microthermometric evidence. Can. Mineral. 2000, 38, 915–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Huang, X.L.; Wang, R.C.; Chen, X.M.; Hu, H.; Liu, C.S. Vertical variations in the mineralogy of the Yichun topaz–lepidolite granite, Jiangxi province, Southern China. Can. Mineral. 2002, 40, 1047–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhu, Z.Y.; Wang, R.C.; Che, X.D.; Zhu, J.C.; Wei, X.L.; Huang, X. Magmatic–hydrothermal rareelement mineralization in the Songshugang granite (northeastern Jiangxi, China): Insights from an electron-microprobe study of Nb–Ta–Zr minerals. Ore Geol. Rev. 2015, 65, 749–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Alfonso, P.; Hamid, S.A.; Garcia-Valles, M.; Llorens, T.; López Moro, F.J.; Tomasa, O.; Calvo, D.; Guasch, E.; Anticoi, H.; Oliva, J.; et al. Textural and mineral-chemistry constraints on columbitegroup minerals in the Penouta deposit: Evidence from magmatic and fluid-related processes. Mineral. Mag. 2018, 82 (Suppl. S1), S199–S222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wu, M.; Samson, I.M.; Zhang, D. Textural Features and Chemical Evolution in Ta-Nb Oxides: Implications for Deuteric Rare-Metal Mineralization in the Yichun Granite-Marginal Pegmatite, Southeastern China. Econ. Geol. 2018, 113, 937–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Geological structure of SARGB and its position in the Ladoga-Dalecarlian anorthosite-rapakivi granite pluton belt, Fennoscandian Shield. After: [16,17] modified. (A) Ladoga-Dalecarlian anorthosite-rapakivi granite pluton belt (1660–1530 Ma). 1—East European Platform cover; 2—Jotnian grabens (volcanic-sedimentary rocks and diabase dikes); 3—anorthosite-rapakivi granite plutons; 4–6—Late Svecofennian (post-orogenic) igneous complexes: 4—shoshonitic series intrusives (1815–1770 Ma), 5—Potassium S-granite zones (1814–1806 Ma), 6—HT/LP granulite-facies metamorphic zones; 7—Vepsian depressions (volcanic-sedimentary and sedimentary complexes of the Petrozavodsk and Shoksha suites, 1760 Ma gabbro-dolerite sills); 8—Early Svecofennian volcanic-sedimentary and igneous complexes; 9—Archean rocks of the Karelian Craton; 10—Early Proterozoic depressions (Sumian, Jatulian, Ludicovian) of the Karelian Craton; 11—kimberlitic Kimozero (1.92 Ga) [18]. (B) Geological structure of the SARGB and the distribution of deposits in the PMD, modified after [16,17]. 1—platform cover; 2—Jotnian volcanic-sedimentary rocks (Salmi suite); 3–10—SARGB rocks: 3—topaz-bearing granites (Li–F granites), 4—fine-grained porphyraceous biotite granites, 5—coarse-grained biotite granites, 6—coarse-grained biotite-hornblende granites, 7—ovoid biotite-hornblende rapakivi granites with fine-grained matrix, 8—vyborgites and pyterlites, 9—coarse-grained biotite-hornblende quartz syenites, 10—mafic and intermediate rocks (anorthosite, norite, ferrodiorite, monzonite); 11–12—PR1 supracrustal rocks: 11—from the Svecokarelian Folded Region (a—Ladoga series, b—Sortavala series), 12—from the Karelian Craton; 13—AR2-PR1 remobilized Archean gneiss–granite cupolas; 14–16—Karelian Craton complexes (AR2): 14—granites and migmatite-granites, 15—greenstone belts, 16—тonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite-association; 17—ore deposits and occurrences: a—Sn-Be-base metal deposits PMD, b—Karhu U-base metal deposit, c—Kuivaniemi Mo-occurrence in quartz-feldspathic metasomatic rocks. 18—border of Figure 2. Deposits of the PMD (numbers in a white circle on the scheme): 1–4—skarn-propylitic-Sn-base metal (1—Kulismajoki, 2—Kitelä, 3—Staroye Rudnoye Pole, 4— Heposelka), 5–10—skarn-greisen Sn–Be and Sn-Be-base metal: (5—Novoye Rudnoye Pole, 6—Hopunvaara, 7—Lupikko, 8—South Lupikko, 9—Ristiniemi, 10—Uuksa), 11—Karhu (U).
Figure 1. Geological structure of SARGB and its position in the Ladoga-Dalecarlian anorthosite-rapakivi granite pluton belt, Fennoscandian Shield. After: [16,17] modified. (A) Ladoga-Dalecarlian anorthosite-rapakivi granite pluton belt (1660–1530 Ma). 1—East European Platform cover; 2—Jotnian grabens (volcanic-sedimentary rocks and diabase dikes); 3—anorthosite-rapakivi granite plutons; 4–6—Late Svecofennian (post-orogenic) igneous complexes: 4—shoshonitic series intrusives (1815–1770 Ma), 5—Potassium S-granite zones (1814–1806 Ma), 6—HT/LP granulite-facies metamorphic zones; 7—Vepsian depressions (volcanic-sedimentary and sedimentary complexes of the Petrozavodsk and Shoksha suites, 1760 Ma gabbro-dolerite sills); 8—Early Svecofennian volcanic-sedimentary and igneous complexes; 9—Archean rocks of the Karelian Craton; 10—Early Proterozoic depressions (Sumian, Jatulian, Ludicovian) of the Karelian Craton; 11—kimberlitic Kimozero (1.92 Ga) [18]. (B) Geological structure of the SARGB and the distribution of deposits in the PMD, modified after [16,17]. 1—platform cover; 2—Jotnian volcanic-sedimentary rocks (Salmi suite); 3–10—SARGB rocks: 3—topaz-bearing granites (Li–F granites), 4—fine-grained porphyraceous biotite granites, 5—coarse-grained biotite granites, 6—coarse-grained biotite-hornblende granites, 7—ovoid biotite-hornblende rapakivi granites with fine-grained matrix, 8—vyborgites and pyterlites, 9—coarse-grained biotite-hornblende quartz syenites, 10—mafic and intermediate rocks (anorthosite, norite, ferrodiorite, monzonite); 11–12—PR1 supracrustal rocks: 11—from the Svecokarelian Folded Region (a—Ladoga series, b—Sortavala series), 12—from the Karelian Craton; 13—AR2-PR1 remobilized Archean gneiss–granite cupolas; 14–16—Karelian Craton complexes (AR2): 14—granites and migmatite-granites, 15—greenstone belts, 16—тonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite-association; 17—ore deposits and occurrences: a—Sn-Be-base metal deposits PMD, b—Karhu U-base metal deposit, c—Kuivaniemi Mo-occurrence in quartz-feldspathic metasomatic rocks. 18—border of Figure 2. Deposits of the PMD (numbers in a white circle on the scheme): 1–4—skarn-propylitic-Sn-base metal (1—Kulismajoki, 2—Kitelä, 3—Staroye Rudnoye Pole, 4— Heposelka), 5–10—skarn-greisen Sn–Be and Sn-Be-base metal: (5—Novoye Rudnoye Pole, 6—Hopunvaara, 7—Lupikko, 8—South Lupikko, 9—Ristiniemi, 10—Uuksa), 11—Karhu (U).
Minerals 13 00648 g001
Figure 2. Scheme showing the geological structure of the PMD, modified after [13,16]. 1—Salmi suite: a—sandstones, conglomerates, b—basalts, dolerites; 2–5—rapakivi granites: 2—leucogranites and lithium-fluorine granites, 3—fine–grained granites, 4—medium-grained porphyritic biotite granites, 5a—granite–porphyry, 5b—porphyritic amphibole–biotite granites; 6—pegmatites; 7—synorogenic plagiogranites, granodiorites; 8—remobilized Archean gneissose granitic domes (1—Pitkäranta, 2—Vinberg, 3—Lupikko, 4—Uuksa, 5—Ristiniemi, 6—Heposelka, 7—Juläristi, 8—Pusunsaari, 9—Kulismajoki); 9—Ladoga series: biotite–quartz, quartz–feldspathic–biotite and graphite–bearing schists; 10—Pitkäranta suite: Amphibolites, amphibole, graphite and graphite–bearing schists, dolomitic and calcitic marbles and skarns after them; 11—skarns, greisenized skarns and low-temperature metasomatic rocks after them with Fe–Cu–Zn–Sn and rare–metal mineralization; 12—tectonic dislocations; 13—projection onto the modern erosion surface of the boundary of the sharp bend of the top of the Salmi massif (it delineates the skarn zone with Fe–Cu–Zn–Sn mineralization).
Figure 2. Scheme showing the geological structure of the PMD, modified after [13,16]. 1—Salmi suite: a—sandstones, conglomerates, b—basalts, dolerites; 2–5—rapakivi granites: 2—leucogranites and lithium-fluorine granites, 3—fine–grained granites, 4—medium-grained porphyritic biotite granites, 5a—granite–porphyry, 5b—porphyritic amphibole–biotite granites; 6—pegmatites; 7—synorogenic plagiogranites, granodiorites; 8—remobilized Archean gneissose granitic domes (1—Pitkäranta, 2—Vinberg, 3—Lupikko, 4—Uuksa, 5—Ristiniemi, 6—Heposelka, 7—Juläristi, 8—Pusunsaari, 9—Kulismajoki); 9—Ladoga series: biotite–quartz, quartz–feldspathic–biotite and graphite–bearing schists; 10—Pitkäranta suite: Amphibolites, amphibole, graphite and graphite–bearing schists, dolomitic and calcitic marbles and skarns after them; 11—skarns, greisenized skarns and low-temperature metasomatic rocks after them with Fe–Cu–Zn–Sn and rare–metal mineralization; 12—tectonic dislocations; 13—projection onto the modern erosion surface of the boundary of the sharp bend of the top of the Salmi massif (it delineates the skarn zone with Fe–Cu–Zn–Sn mineralization).
Minerals 13 00648 g002
Figure 3. Fluorite mineralization in Li-F granites at Avtodor occurrence. The arrow shows the vertical direction upwards.
Figure 3. Fluorite mineralization in Li-F granites at Avtodor occurrence. The arrow shows the vertical direction upwards.
Minerals 13 00648 g003
Figure 4. SARGB granites on the classification-forest diagram Zr/Hf-SiO2; partially used data [31]; based on [32]. 1—rare-metal siderophyllitic and Li–F granites; 2—leucogranites and biotite granites; 3—granite-porphyry; 4—biotite-amphibole granites.
Figure 4. SARGB granites on the classification-forest diagram Zr/Hf-SiO2; partially used data [31]; based on [32]. 1—rare-metal siderophyllitic and Li–F granites; 2—leucogranites and biotite granites; 3—granite-porphyry; 4—biotite-amphibole granites.
Minerals 13 00648 g004
Figure 5. BSE images. Zavaritskite mineralization in W. Lupikko ores. (a) Zavaritskite in serpentine. (b) Zavaritskite and fluorite in serpentinized diopside. (c) Zavaritskite in diopside. (d) Zavaritskite intergrown with chalcopyrite. For more detail, see text. Di—diopside, Ccp—chalcopyrite, Flr—fluorite, Phl—phlogopite, Py—pyrite, Sp—sphalerite, Srp—serpentine, Zav—zavaritskite BiOF.
Figure 5. BSE images. Zavaritskite mineralization in W. Lupikko ores. (a) Zavaritskite in serpentine. (b) Zavaritskite and fluorite in serpentinized diopside. (c) Zavaritskite in diopside. (d) Zavaritskite intergrown with chalcopyrite. For more detail, see text. Di—diopside, Ccp—chalcopyrite, Flr—fluorite, Phl—phlogopite, Py—pyrite, Sp—sphalerite, Srp—serpentine, Zav—zavaritskite BiOF.
Minerals 13 00648 g005
Figure 6. Photomicrographs of danalite in transmitted light; W. Lupikko greisenized skarns. (a) Danalite in association with phlogopite and fluorite. (b) Danalite in association with biotite, quartz and Zn-spinel. (c) Danalite in biotite. (d) Danalite in a fine-grained aggregate of biotite and fluorite. For more detail, see text. Bt—biotite, Dan—danalite Be3(Fe,Mn,Zn)4(SiO4)3S, Flr—fluorite, Phl—phlogopite, Qz—quartz, Spl—spinel (ZnO 22%–25%).
Figure 6. Photomicrographs of danalite in transmitted light; W. Lupikko greisenized skarns. (a) Danalite in association with phlogopite and fluorite. (b) Danalite in association with biotite, quartz and Zn-spinel. (c) Danalite in biotite. (d) Danalite in a fine-grained aggregate of biotite and fluorite. For more detail, see text. Bt—biotite, Dan—danalite Be3(Fe,Mn,Zn)4(SiO4)3S, Flr—fluorite, Phl—phlogopite, Qz—quartz, Spl—spinel (ZnO 22%–25%).
Minerals 13 00648 g006
Figure 7. BSE images. Danalite mineralization in W. Lupikko ores. (a) Danalite in biotite, containing inclusions of magnetite, fluorite and Zn spinel. (b) Danalite with microinclusions of biotite, Zn spinel and sphalerite. (c) Danalite is corroded by phlogopite and norbergite. For more detail, see text. Bt—biotite, Chl—chlorite, Dan—danalite Be3(Fe,Mn,Zn)4(SiO4)3S, Flr—fluorite, Mag—magnetite, Nrb—norbergite, Phl—phlogopite, Qz—quartz, Sp—sphalerite, Spl—spinel (ZnO 22%–25%), Tho—thorianite.
Figure 7. BSE images. Danalite mineralization in W. Lupikko ores. (a) Danalite in biotite, containing inclusions of magnetite, fluorite and Zn spinel. (b) Danalite with microinclusions of biotite, Zn spinel and sphalerite. (c) Danalite is corroded by phlogopite and norbergite. For more detail, see text. Bt—biotite, Chl—chlorite, Dan—danalite Be3(Fe,Mn,Zn)4(SiO4)3S, Flr—fluorite, Mag—magnetite, Nrb—norbergite, Phl—phlogopite, Qz—quartz, Sp—sphalerite, Spl—spinel (ZnO 22%–25%), Tho—thorianite.
Minerals 13 00648 g007
Figure 8. Bertrandite mineralization in Bek ores: (a,b)—transmitted light photomicrographs; (c,d)—BSE images; for more detail, see text. Btd—bertrandite Be4Si2O7(OH)2, Chl—chlorite, Mag—magnetite, Qz—quartz, Sp—sphalerite.
Figure 8. Bertrandite mineralization in Bek ores: (a,b)—transmitted light photomicrographs; (c,d)—BSE images; for more detail, see text. Btd—bertrandite Be4Si2O7(OH)2, Chl—chlorite, Mag—magnetite, Qz—quartz, Sp—sphalerite.
Minerals 13 00648 g008
Figure 9. Microphotographs of synchysite, zircon, coffinite and fluorite in transmitted light in Muzilampi granites. (a) Synchysite and zircon in a biotite-fluorite aggregate. (b) Coffinite in albite-fluorite-biotite aggregate. For more detail, see text. Bt—biotite, Cof—coffinite, Flr—fluorite, Qz—quartz, Fsp—feldspar, Syn—synchysite, Zrn—zircon.
Figure 9. Microphotographs of synchysite, zircon, coffinite and fluorite in transmitted light in Muzilampi granites. (a) Synchysite and zircon in a biotite-fluorite aggregate. (b) Coffinite in albite-fluorite-biotite aggregate. For more detail, see text. Bt—biotite, Cof—coffinite, Flr—fluorite, Qz—quartz, Fsp—feldspar, Syn—synchysite, Zrn—zircon.
Minerals 13 00648 g009
Figure 10. BSE images. Rare-earth mineralization in Muzilampi granites. (a) Bastnäsite, euxenite and zircon in biotite. (b) Intergrowths of pyrochlore with bastnäsite and columbite in biotite. (c) Coffinite in association with biotite, albite and fluorite. (d) Intergrowths of håleniusite with parisite in association with biotite and albite. (e) Intergrowths of håleniusite, parisite and fluorite association with biotite and quartz. (f) Biotite with microinclusions of bastnäsite. (g) Fluorite with parisite microinclusions. (h) Fluorite with microinclusions of bastnäsite and parisite. (i) Fluorite-1 with fluorite-2 rim. For more detail, see text. Ab—albite, Bsn—bastnäsite, Bt—biotite, Cof—coffinite, Eux—euxenite, Flr—fluorite, Fsp—feldspar, Hal—håleniusite, Pcl—pyrochlore, Pst—parisite, Qz—quartz, Zrn—zircon.
Figure 10. BSE images. Rare-earth mineralization in Muzilampi granites. (a) Bastnäsite, euxenite and zircon in biotite. (b) Intergrowths of pyrochlore with bastnäsite and columbite in biotite. (c) Coffinite in association with biotite, albite and fluorite. (d) Intergrowths of håleniusite with parisite in association with biotite and albite. (e) Intergrowths of håleniusite, parisite and fluorite association with biotite and quartz. (f) Biotite with microinclusions of bastnäsite. (g) Fluorite with parisite microinclusions. (h) Fluorite with microinclusions of bastnäsite and parisite. (i) Fluorite-1 with fluorite-2 rim. For more detail, see text. Ab—albite, Bsn—bastnäsite, Bt—biotite, Cof—coffinite, Eux—euxenite, Flr—fluorite, Fsp—feldspar, Hal—håleniusite, Pcl—pyrochlore, Pst—parisite, Qz—quartz, Zrn—zircon.
Minerals 13 00648 g010
Figure 11. BSE images. Ferricolumbite mineralization in Muzilampi granites. (a) Columbite in association with biotite and quartz. (b) Columbite with a spongy structure filled with fluorite microinclusions. (c) Columbite intergrown with aeschynite in fluorite. (d) Columbite intergrown with bastnäsite in biotite. For more detail, see text. Ab—albite, Aes—aeschynite, Bsn—bastnäsite, Bt—biotite, Clb—columbite, Flr—fluorite, Fsp—feldspar, Pst—parisite, Qz—quartz, Zrn—zircon.
Figure 11. BSE images. Ferricolumbite mineralization in Muzilampi granites. (a) Columbite in association with biotite and quartz. (b) Columbite with a spongy structure filled with fluorite microinclusions. (c) Columbite intergrown with aeschynite in fluorite. (d) Columbite intergrown with bastnäsite in biotite. For more detail, see text. Ab—albite, Aes—aeschynite, Bsn—bastnäsite, Bt—biotite, Clb—columbite, Flr—fluorite, Fsp—feldspar, Pst—parisite, Qz—quartz, Zrn—zircon.
Minerals 13 00648 g011
Figure 12. BSE images. Rare-earth mineralization in Hepaoja granites. (a) Microinclusions of bastnäsite in fluorite. (b) Parisite in association with muscovite and quartz. (c) Kaolinite and aeschynite in biotite. (d) Intergrowths of monazite with magnetite. (e) Intergrowths of columbite and bastnäsite in fluorite. (f) Zircon in association with biotite, albite and quartz. For more detail, see text. Ab—albite, Aes—aeschynite, Bsn—bastnäsite, Bt—biotite, Chl—chlorite, Flr—fluorite, Fsp—feldspar, Kln—kaolinite, Clb—columbite, Mag—magnetite, Mnz—monazite, Ms—muscovite, Qz—quartz, Zrn—zircon.
Figure 12. BSE images. Rare-earth mineralization in Hepaoja granites. (a) Microinclusions of bastnäsite in fluorite. (b) Parisite in association with muscovite and quartz. (c) Kaolinite and aeschynite in biotite. (d) Intergrowths of monazite with magnetite. (e) Intergrowths of columbite and bastnäsite in fluorite. (f) Zircon in association with biotite, albite and quartz. For more detail, see text. Ab—albite, Aes—aeschynite, Bsn—bastnäsite, Bt—biotite, Chl—chlorite, Flr—fluorite, Fsp—feldspar, Kln—kaolinite, Clb—columbite, Mag—magnetite, Mnz—monazite, Ms—muscovite, Qz—quartz, Zrn—zircon.
Minerals 13 00648 g012
Figure 13. BSE images. Ferricolumbite mineralization in Hepaoja granites. (a) Columbite in association with quartz and biotite. (b) Intergrowths of prismatic crystals of columbite in biotite. (c) Zonal columbite crystal. (d) Veinlet-like grain of columbite. For more detail, see text. Ab—albite, Bt—biotite, Clb—columbite, Flr—fluorite, Fsp—feldspar, Mag—magnetite, Qz—quartz, Zrn—zircon.
Figure 13. BSE images. Ferricolumbite mineralization in Hepaoja granites. (a) Columbite in association with quartz and biotite. (b) Intergrowths of prismatic crystals of columbite in biotite. (c) Zonal columbite crystal. (d) Veinlet-like grain of columbite. For more detail, see text. Ab—albite, Bt—biotite, Clb—columbite, Flr—fluorite, Fsp—feldspar, Mag—magnetite, Qz—quartz, Zrn—zircon.
Minerals 13 00648 g013
Figure 14. Endocontact breccia of Li-F granites at Avtodor occurrence. (a) Siderophyllitic granites and amphibole schists occur as fragments; matrix consists of topaz-protolithionitic granites; orange patch—fluorite filled with micron-sized synchysite inclusions (b), BSE image.
Figure 14. Endocontact breccia of Li-F granites at Avtodor occurrence. (a) Siderophyllitic granites and amphibole schists occur as fragments; matrix consists of topaz-protolithionitic granites; orange patch—fluorite filled with micron-sized synchysite inclusions (b), BSE image.
Minerals 13 00648 g014
Figure 15. BSE images. Rare-earth mineralization in Avtodor granites. (a) Monazite and xenotime in association with topaz, fluorite and biotite. (b) Intergrowth of monazite and xenotime crystals in topaz. (c) Veinlet-like grain of monazite in fluorite. (d) Molybdenite and monazite in association with albite and biotite. (e) Monazite with biotite and pyrite rims. (f) Intergrowth of bastnäsite with synchysite and pyrite. (g) Microinclusions of bastnäsite and synchysite in fluorite. (h) Microinclusions of bastnäsite and synchysite in fluorite. (i) Stetindite in fluorite. For more detail, see text. Ab—albite, Bsn—bastnäsite, Bt—biotite, Chl—chlorite, Flr—fluorite, Mnz—monazite, Mol—molybdenite, Ms—muscovite, Py—pyrite, Qz—quartz, Std—stetindite, Tpz—topaz, Xtm—xenotime, Zrn—zircon.
Figure 15. BSE images. Rare-earth mineralization in Avtodor granites. (a) Monazite and xenotime in association with topaz, fluorite and biotite. (b) Intergrowth of monazite and xenotime crystals in topaz. (c) Veinlet-like grain of monazite in fluorite. (d) Molybdenite and monazite in association with albite and biotite. (e) Monazite with biotite and pyrite rims. (f) Intergrowth of bastnäsite with synchysite and pyrite. (g) Microinclusions of bastnäsite and synchysite in fluorite. (h) Microinclusions of bastnäsite and synchysite in fluorite. (i) Stetindite in fluorite. For more detail, see text. Ab—albite, Bsn—bastnäsite, Bt—biotite, Chl—chlorite, Flr—fluorite, Mnz—monazite, Mol—molybdenite, Ms—muscovite, Py—pyrite, Qz—quartz, Std—stetindite, Tpz—topaz, Xtm—xenotime, Zrn—zircon.
Minerals 13 00648 g015
Figure 16. BSE images. Rare-earth mineralization in Avtodor granites. (a) Micromiarole with synhysite and hollandite in monazite. (b) Zonal xenotime crystal in fluorite. (c) Intergrowths of xenotime and bastnäsite in fluorite. (d) Intergrowths of bastnäsite, synchysite and xenotime in fluorite. (e) Monazite with synhysite and hollandite rims. (f) Bastnäsite and synhysite in an albite-fluorite aggregate. For more detail, see text. Ab—albite, Bsn—bastnäsite, Flr—fluorite, Hol—hollandite, Mnz—monazite, Qz—quartz, Syn—synchysite, Xtm—xenotime.
Figure 16. BSE images. Rare-earth mineralization in Avtodor granites. (a) Micromiarole with synhysite and hollandite in monazite. (b) Zonal xenotime crystal in fluorite. (c) Intergrowths of xenotime and bastnäsite in fluorite. (d) Intergrowths of bastnäsite, synchysite and xenotime in fluorite. (e) Monazite with synhysite and hollandite rims. (f) Bastnäsite and synhysite in an albite-fluorite aggregate. For more detail, see text. Ab—albite, Bsn—bastnäsite, Flr—fluorite, Hol—hollandite, Mnz—monazite, Qz—quartz, Syn—synchysite, Xtm—xenotime.
Minerals 13 00648 g016
Figure 17. BSE images. Ferricolumbite mineralization in Avtodor granites. (a) Zonal veinlet-like grain of fluorite, columbite, ilmenorutile, rutile and muscovite in topaz. (b) Sprouts of ilmerutile in rutile and rutile in ilmenorutile. (c) Nb-bearing rutile and pyrite in chlorite. For more detail, see text. Ab—albite, Chl—chlorite, Clb—columbite, Flr—fluorite, Fsp—feldspar, Ilr—ilmenorutile, Kln—kaolinite, Ms—muscovite, Py—pyrite, Rt—rutile, Tpz—topaz.
Figure 17. BSE images. Ferricolumbite mineralization in Avtodor granites. (a) Zonal veinlet-like grain of fluorite, columbite, ilmenorutile, rutile and muscovite in topaz. (b) Sprouts of ilmerutile in rutile and rutile in ilmenorutile. (c) Nb-bearing rutile and pyrite in chlorite. For more detail, see text. Ab—albite, Chl—chlorite, Clb—columbite, Flr—fluorite, Fsp—feldspar, Ilr—ilmenorutile, Kln—kaolinite, Ms—muscovite, Py—pyrite, Rt—rutile, Tpz—topaz.
Minerals 13 00648 g017
Figure 18. Fe2+, Mn2+, Zn2+ ratio in helvite group minerals W. Lupikko and Gerberz-I.
Figure 18. Fe2+, Mn2+, Zn2+ ratio in helvite group minerals W. Lupikko and Gerberz-I.
Minerals 13 00648 g018
Figure 19. Compositions of the aeschynite, euxenite, and samarskite analyzed on the CV1–CV2 three-group diagram of [41].
Figure 19. Compositions of the aeschynite, euxenite, and samarskite analyzed on the CV1–CV2 three-group diagram of [41].
Minerals 13 00648 g019
Figure 20. Columbite-tantalite-group minerals at Musilampi, Hepaoja, and Avtodor occurrences on a classification diagram [7,68].
Figure 20. Columbite-tantalite-group minerals at Musilampi, Hepaoja, and Avtodor occurrences on a classification diagram [7,68].
Minerals 13 00648 g020
Table 1. Representative electron microanalyses and atomic proportions of zavaritskite.
Table 1. Representative electron microanalyses and atomic proportions of zavaritskite.
wt.%Lu1Lu2Lu3Lu4Lu5Lu6Lu7
Bi2O395.9095.8395.1081.5790.3194.1987.98
TeO2bdbdbd12.13bdbdbd
PbObdbdbdbd4.73bd6.02
F7.187.167.359.527.589.928.76
Total103.08102.99102.44103.22102.62104.11102.76
-O=F23.023.013.094.013.194.183.69
Total100.0699.9899.3599.2199.4399.9399.07
Chemical formula
Bi0.9840.9850.9760.7240.9300.8900.878
Te 0.157
Pb 0.051 0.063
O1.0241.0471.0020.8820.9680.7610.844
F0.9040.9020.9251.0370.9571.1491.072
Table 2. Representative electron microanalyses and atomic proportions of aeschynite. (Mu1, Mu4, Mu5) and euxenite (Mu2, Mu3, Mu6, Mu7) occurrence Muzilampi.
Table 2. Representative electron microanalyses and atomic proportions of aeschynite. (Mu1, Mu4, Mu5) and euxenite (Mu2, Mu3, Mu6, Mu7) occurrence Muzilampi.
wt.%Mu1Mu2Mu3Mu4Mu5Mu6Mu7
CaO3.062.202.021.912.701.891.92
TiO27.6413.0011.7111.5112.3011.2112.57
FeO7.164.456.944.426.177.148.33
Y2O3bd8.357.628.527.908.826.24
Nb2O536.1540.9443.3838.8442.7940.9942.12
Ta2O523.2010.448.759.768.809.389.33
Ce2O33.723.372.053.144.803.043.05
Nd2O32.34bd1.921.43bdbd0.48
WO3bd6.036.086.214.616.044.77
ThO28.654.762.243.492.513.434.38
UO36.955.537.339.666.387.296.49
Total98.8799.09100.04100.0898.9699.2499.67
Chemical formula
Ca0.2270.1510.1350.1330.1800.1280.128
Ti0.3980.6280.5520.5630.5770.5360.588
Fe0.4150.2390.3640.2410.3220.3800.433
Y 0.2860.2540.2940.2630.2980.206
Nb1.1321.1891.2291.1411.2071.1771.184
Ta0.4370.1820.1490.1720.1490.1620.158
Ce0.0950.0790.0470.0840.1100.0710.069
Nd0.058 0.0430.033 0.011
W 0.1000.0990.1050.0740.1000.077
Th0.1370.0700.0320.0520.0360.0500.062
U0.1010.0740.0970.1320.0830.0970.085
O6.0666.2096.1196.0826.0256.0756.046
CV1−1.4210.608−0.0050.5280.324−0.232−0.356
CV2−0.284−1.031−1.738−1.361−1.494−1.867−1.565
CV1, CV2 [41]; CV1 = 0.245 Na + 0.106 Ca − 0.077 Fe* + 0.425 Pb + 0.220 Y + 0.280 LREE + 0.137 HREE + 0.100 U* + 0.304 Ti + 0.097 Nb + 0.109 Ta* − 12.81 (oxide wt.%); CV2 = 0.102 Na − 0.113 Ca − 0.371 Fe* − 0.167 Pb − 0.395 Y − 0.280 LREE − 0.265 HREE − 0.182 U* − 0.085 Ti − 0.166 Nb − 0.146 Ta* + 17.29 (oxide wt.%) Fe* = FeO + Fe2O3 + MnO, U* = UO2 + UO3 + U3O8 + ThO2, and Ta* = Ta2O5 + WO3.
Table 3. Representative electron microanalyses and atomic proportions of columbite occurrence Muzilampi.
Table 3. Representative electron microanalyses and atomic proportions of columbite occurrence Muzilampi.
wt.%Mu1Mu2Mu3Mu4Mu5Mu6Mu7Mu8Mu9Mu10Mu11Mu12Mu13Mu14Mu15Mu16
Ta2O5bdbd1.522.012.322.833.213.454.034.304.314.935.256.066.1714.55
Nb2O576.1876.4172.8273.0172.2873.8473.0472.9173.1168.7974.6671.8174.5667.6170.9559.28
TiO21.711.732.501.462.061.411.591.471.072.171.631.480.821.681.520.70
WO3bdbd2.643.162.451.260.74bd2.361.98bd1.66bd2.162.564.12
Y2O3bdbd1.712.10bdbdbdbdbdbdbdbdbdbdbd2.57
Yb2O3bdbdbdbdbdbdbdbdbd2.16bdbdbdbdbdbd
FeO19.4118.6917.0518.1318.2418.4419.1119.1817.5317.8817.6618.8017.3218.2417.5617.18
MnO2.272.521.301.461.992.231.752.991.471.991.741.951.781.992.320.89
Total99.5799.3699.55101.3499.3310099.4410099.5799.27100100.6399.7297.95101.1099.28
Chemical formula
Ta 0.0240.0310.0360.0440.0490.0530.0640.0680.0670.0770.0830.0970.970.243
Nb1.9181.9321.8931.8691.8701.8971.8781.8461.9261.8041.9331.8481.9541.7921.8431.646
Ti0.0720.0730.1080.0620.0880.0600.0680.0610.0460.0940.070.0630.0350.0740.0660.033
W 0.0390.0460.0360.0190.049 0.0350.030 0.024 0.0330.0380.066
Y 0.0530.063 0.084
Yb 0.039
Fe0.9040.8750.8200.8590.8720.8760.9090.8980.8540.8670.8450.8950.8400.9040.8430.882
Mn0.1070.1190.0640.0710.0970.1070.0840.1420.0730.0980.0840.0940.0870.0990.1130.046
O5.9505.9706.0896.0366.0186.0135.9805.9106.0995.9826.0696.006.0895.9736.0526.041
Ta/(Ta + Nb)000.0130.0160.0190.0230.0250.0280.0320.0360.0340.0400.0410.0510.0500.129
Mn/(Mn + Fe)0.1060.1200.0720.0760.1000.1090.0850.1370.0790.1020.0900.0950.0940.0990.1180.050
Table 4. Representative electron microanalyses and atomic proportions of the bastnäsite occurrence of Hepaoja.
Table 4. Representative electron microanalyses and atomic proportions of the bastnäsite occurrence of Hepaoja.
wt.%H1H2H3H4H5H6
CaObd1.36bd1.733.542.41
Y2O3bdbdbdbd1.314.66
La2O3354.8037.7516.7320.2213.3412.21
Ce2O38.4614.8240.7236.9536.8235.41
Pr2O37.513.783.393.564.264.00
Nd2O318.3614.4814.9111.8514.8714.76
Pm2O3bd2.41bdbdbdbd
Eu2O3bd2.42bdbdbdbd
Gd2O33.132.04bdbdbdbd
ThO21.45bdbdbd2.204.21
CO2*19.9218.8720.0521.2419.8018.67
F9.275.937.257.696.666.33
Total103.90102.50103.05103.24102.80102.66
-O=F23.902.503.053.242.802.66
Total100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00
Chemical formula
Ca 0.055 0.0650.1380.096
Y 0.0250.092
La0.4720.5240.2250.2620.1790.168
Ce0.1110.2040.5450.4760.4900.484
Pr0.0990.0520.0450.0460.0560.054
Nd0.2340.1950.1940.1490.1930.197
Gd0.0370.032
Th0.0240.031 0.0360.071
0.025
CO30.9710.9701.0001.0200.9830.952
F1.0470.7060.8380.8550.7660.748
All analyses were normalized to 100%. CO2*—calculated data.
Table 5. Representative electron microanalyses and atomic proportions of the columbite occurrence of Hepaoja.
Table 5. Representative electron microanalyses and atomic proportions of the columbite occurrence of Hepaoja.
wt. %1234567891011121314151617
Ta2O53.404.605.937.077.448.0111.4912.1112.5612.6012.9414.8217.0718.0421.7525.0038.16
Nb2O572.7873.4970.3869.0469.6368.3861.3265.2565.8664.4663.6063.6060.5858.4755.2750.3338.08
TiO21.461.671.171.071.581.571.680.65bd0.61bd0.710.841.181.411.282.33
WO31.64bd1.882.39bd1.756.241.812.812.562.622.522.35bd3.035.684.40
Sc2O3bdbd0.38bdbdbdbdbdbdbd0.40bdbdbd0.41bdbd
FeO18.5818.3817.8818.5219.3919.0317.6918.1117.3917.8818.3916.7316.9217.0616.4615.9315.38
MnO2.141.862.381.931.961.261.592.081.381.892.061.632.352.171.681.781.64
Chemical formula
Ta0.0520.0710.0930.1120.1150.1260.1880.1950.2070.2050.2090.2450.2820.2990.3680.4350.696
Nb1.8731.8921.8321.8121.7981.7941.6691.7481.8001.7391.7111.7481.6671.6141.5531.4581.155
Ti0.0630.0710.0500.0470.0680.0680.0760.029 0.027 0.0330.0380.0540.0660.0620.118
W0.024 0.0280.036 0.0260.0970.0280.0440.0400.0400.0400.037 0.0490.0940.077
Sc 0.019 0.021 0.023
Fe0.8850.8760.8600.8890.9260.9230.8910.8970.8790.8920.9150.8510.8620.8710.8550.8540.862
Mn0.1040.0890.1160.0950.0950.0620.0810.1040.0710.0960.1040.0840.1160.1130.0890.0960.093
O6.0005.9446.0015.9965.9405.9996.0576.0016.1006.0225.9716.1046.0385.8686.0606.0896.050
Ta/(Ta + Nb)0.0270.0360.0480.0580.0600.0660.1010.1000.1030.1050.1090.1230.1450.1560.1920.2300.376
Mn/(Mn + Fe)0.1050.0920.1190.0970.0930.0630.0830.1040.0750.0970.1020.900.1190.1150.0940.1010.097
All analyses were normalized to 100%.
Table 6. Representative electron microanalyses and atomic proportions of the monazite occurrence of Avtodor.
Table 6. Representative electron microanalyses and atomic proportions of the monazite occurrence of Avtodor.
Wt.%Av1Av2Av3Av4Av5Av6Av7Av8Av9Av10
La2O318.8012.5311.1222.4610.6713.8413.6412.7713.0014.59
Ce2O335.4635.2527.6637.5234.5835.6137.5539.2334.4034.55
Pr2O3bdbdbdbd4.013.08bdbdbd2.80
Nd2O312.3513.2322.008.6616.1910.559.8610.9314.5812.37
ThO2bd5.606,60bd3.8710.028.555.284.376.24
P2O532.0533.3832.8630.7830.2927.2829.3432.3332.2929.32
Total98.6699.99100.2399.4199.60100.3798.94100.5498.6499.87
Chemical formula
La0.2690.1830.1570.3200.1640.2110.2010.1700.1730.216
Ce0.5040.5030.3980.5400.5060.5380.5600.5300.4510.509
Pr 0.0600.046 0.041
Nd0.1720.1830.3040.1200.2300.1550.1400.1400.1910.178
Th 0.0460.063 0.0300.0940.0800.0500.0400.057
P1.0551.0851.0781.0201.0100.9561.0011.1101.1000.999
O4.0554.1084.0524.0204.0254.0034.0144.1354.0534.005
Table 7. Representative electron microanalyses and atomic proportions of the columbite (Av1, Av2), ilmenorutile (Av3-Av8) and rutile (Av9) occurrence Avtodor.
Table 7. Representative electron microanalyses and atomic proportions of the columbite (Av1, Av2), ilmenorutile (Av3-Av8) and rutile (Av9) occurrence Avtodor.
wt. %Av1Av2Av3Av4Av5Av6Av7Av8Av9
TiO21.793.1331.0668.2761.5274.1071.5578.1495.24
FeO13.9413.539.526.907.205.485.765.082.10
MnO4.585.353.68bdbdbdbdbdbd
Nb2O561.3565.2639.4519.6518.0215.8414.2411.362.21
Ta2O514.798.669.334.6112.084.215.984.99bd
WO34.292.806.68bd1.34bd2.86bdbd
Sc2O3bd0.47bdbdbdbdbdbdbd
Total100.7499.2099.7399.43100.1699.64100.3799.5799.55
Chemical formula
Ti0.0810.1380.4130.7640.7220.8120.7980.8460.963
Fe0.7040.6640.1410.0860.0940.0670.0710.0610.024
Mn0.2350.2660.550
Nb1.6731.7290.3150.1320.1270.1040.0950.0740.013
Ta0.2430.1610.4500.0190.0510.0170.0240.019
W0.0670.0420.031 0.005 0.011
O6.0926.057
Ta/(Ta + Nb)0.1270.085
Mn/(Mn + Fe)0.2500.286
Table 8. Trace elements composition of biotite occurrence Muzilampi (LA ICP MS).
Table 8. Trace elements composition of biotite occurrence Muzilampi (LA ICP MS).
ppm123456
Be22.3544.722.35bd18.63bd
Sc39.8944.2245.8646.6840.1249.25
Zn264253.2390.3593.5131199.4
Ga125166.3192.2222.9103.5137.3
Ge29.4926.2230.9532.0419.6639.32
As35.9139.5758.2632.9838.4764.12
Rb249737565805503718112932
Sr183.5134.9125.9135.8182.3335.9
Y14429411258346.4198.9639.2
Zr378.4681.2349.4143.2454.1574
Nb251751177779748726453087
Cdbd23.57bd47.1328.28bd
In10.177.5578.1967.1286.6289.077
Sn43.3764.3268.6998.0925.6148.02
Ba692.4100511101341882.2977.7
Hf20.1533.5820.1520.1516.796.716
Ta307.6611.6908.9939.3323.9517.7
Pb121.7125.5212.8101.782.9190.81
Th43.54879.525.53629.25
U46.4165.2533.8216.4217.478.84
REE4756.852829.524016.571272.6477.931786.21
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ivashchenko, V.I. Critical Metals Mineralization in the Late-Stage Intrusions of Salmi Batholith, Ladoga Karelia, Russia. Minerals 2023, 13, 648. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13050648

AMA Style

Ivashchenko VI. Critical Metals Mineralization in the Late-Stage Intrusions of Salmi Batholith, Ladoga Karelia, Russia. Minerals. 2023; 13(5):648. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13050648

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ivashchenko, Vasily I. 2023. "Critical Metals Mineralization in the Late-Stage Intrusions of Salmi Batholith, Ladoga Karelia, Russia" Minerals 13, no. 5: 648. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13050648

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop