Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of Zeolites from Greek Fly Ash and Assessment of Their Copper Removal Capacity
Previous Article in Journal
Geophysical Prospecting for Groundwater Resources in Phosphate Deposits (Morocco)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Magma Mingling in Kimberlites: Evidence from the Groundmass Cocrystallization of Two Spinel-Group Minerals
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Coulsonite FeV2O4—A Rare Vanadium Spinel Group Mineral in Metamorphosed Massive Sulfide Ores of the Kola Region, Russia

by
Alena A. Kompanchenko
Geological Institute of the Federal Research Centre “Kola Science Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences”, 14 Fersman Street, 184209 Apatity, Russia
Minerals 2020, 10(10), 843; https://doi.org/10.3390/min10100843
Submission received: 24 August 2020 / Revised: 19 September 2020 / Accepted: 21 September 2020 / Published: 24 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spinel Group Minerals, Volume II)

Abstract

:
This work presents new data on a rare vanadium spinel group mineral, i.e., coulsonite FeV2O4 established in massive sulfide ores of the Bragino occurrence in the Kola region, Russia. Coulsonite in massive sulfide ores of the Bragino occurrence is one of the most common vanadium minerals. Three varieties of coulsonite were established based on its chemical composition, some physical properties, and mineral association: coulsonite-I, coulsonite-II, and coulsonite-III. Coulsonite-I forms octahedral crystal clusters of up to 500 µm, and has a uniformly high content of Cr2O3 (20–30 wt.%), ZnO (up to 4.5 wt.%), and MnO (2.8 wt.%), high microhardness (743 kg/mm2) and coefficient of reflection. Coulsonite-II was found in relics of quartz–albite veins in association with other vanadium minerals. Its features are a thin tabular shape and enrichment in TiO2 of up to 18 wt.%. Coulsonite-III is the most common variety in massive sulfide ores of the Bragino occurrence. Coulsonite-III forms octahedral crystals of up to 150 µm, crystal clusters, and intergrowths with V-bearing ilmenite, W-V-bearing rutile, Sc-V-bearing senaite, etc. Chemical composition of coulsonite-III is characterized by wide variation of the major compounds—Fe, V, Cr. In some crystals of coulsonite-III, relics of chromite are observed. The microhardness of coulsonite-III is 577 kg/mm2, the reflection coefficient changes in relation to iron, vanadium, and chromium content.

1. Introduction

Coulsonite is a naturally occurring iron-vanadium spinel group mineral with formula FeV2O4. According to www.midat.org, the type locality of coulsonite is the Buena Vista Hills east of Lovelock, Nevada (USA) where coulsonite was identified in magnetite-bearing rocks. The mineral occurs as an ilmenite-like exsolution in magnetite and disseminated subhedral crystals in silicate gangue separated from magnetite [1].
Many findings of rare vanadium minerals, including vanadium spinel, are connected with high-grade metamorphic complexes where two main conditions are required: primary enrichment of host rock in vanadium and high degree of metamorphism (up to amphibolite facies). For example, the only tanzanite deposit in the world is in Tanzania [2,3]. A lot of vanadium minerals were found in metamorphic rock of the Sludyanka complex in the southern Baikal area (Russia), such as new mineral species, including magnesiocoulsonite MgV2O4 [4,5,6,7]. Yet, the most significant findings of vanadium spinel group minerals are associated with metamorphosed massive sulfide ores described only in supracrustal units of several Paleoproterozoic rift-related structures of ancient cratons worldwide.
Coulsonite, along with other vanadium minerals, was identified in massive sulfide ores in the Kola region (Russia), the Vihanti (Finland) and the Rampura Agucha (India) deposits [8,9,10,11]. The third vanadium spinel, vourelainenite MnV2O4, was discovered in massive sulfide ores in the Sätra deposit (Sweden) [12] and also found in the Outokumpu deposit (Finland) [13]. All these massive sulfide ore deposits and occurrences have similar main characteristics: geological position (Paleoproterozoic rift-related structure), time of formation (ca. 1.9 Ga), high degree of metamorphism (up to amphibolite or even granulite facies), and mineral composition (the main mineral is pyrrhotite) [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21].
Vanadium mineralization in the Kola region was earlier partially described [22]. This work provides data on a more detailed study of coulsonite, i.e., the main vanadium mineral in the Kola region massive sulfide ores. Data on coulsonite from the Bragino and Pyrrhotite Ravine occurrences after [8] were obtained by the author of this work.

2. Geological Setting

A detailed description of the geological setting was given in [23], therefore in this work only brief overview is presented.
Occurrences and deposits of massive sulfide ores of the Kola region are located in the Pechenga–Imandra–Varzuga Paleoproterozoic riftogenic belt, which formed during 2.5–1.7 Ga [24,25,26,27].
The Bragino massive sulfide ore occurrence is located in basic volcanics of the Mennel formation, which belongs to the central part of the South Pechenga structural zone (Figure 1). These rocks are depleted in K, Sr, Rb, Ta, Zr, Hf, Ti, light and heavy rare-earth elements, and enriched in Ba, Th, and Nb. Host rock for the Bragino occurrence belong to low-alkali and Fe-Mg-enriched rocks of the normal-type mid-ocean ridge basalts (MORB) [28,29]. The vanadium content in volcanics of the Mennel formation varies between 160 and 450 ppm [28], which is just slightly higher than that in the Earth’s crust (138 ppm) [30]. There is an imprecise Sm-Nd age of 1.89 ± 0.04 [29], as well as Rb-Sr isochron whole-rock ages of 1.87 ± 0.05 [31]. The Bragino occurrence host rock was metamorphosed in amphibolite facies [28,29].
According to a previous study [32] and the author’s field observations, an ore body of the Bragino occurrence is a lens up to 7 m in thickness, ca. 100 m in length, and 70–75° dip. The most part of the ore body is covered with quaternary sediments. Thirty samples of massive sulfide ores with an average weight of 2 kg were cut from bedrock outcrops.
Based on the texture of the ores, four of ores types were distinguished within the Bragino occurrence: massive, banded, brecciated, and disseminated. Massive ores are the most common. This ore type can be divided into three subtypes based on their mineralogical composition: massive pyrrhotite ores of type I (mPo-I), massive pyrrhotite ores of the type II (mPo-II), and massive pyrite ores [23]. These ore types will be considered below. The content of V2O5 in these ores does not exceed 0.06%.

3. Methods

The microscopic study of ore minerals in reflected light was conducted using an optical microscope Axioplane. Chemical analyses of the minerals were carried out by the Cameca MS-46 electron probe microanalyzer (Geological Institute, Kola Science Centre of the RAS, Apatity, Russia), WDS (Wavelength Dispersive Spectrometer) mode, 22 kV, 20–30 nA, 5–20 μm beam diameter (Cameca, Gennevilliers, France). The following standards (and analytical lines) were used: diopside (Si, Ca), anatase (Ti), MnCO3 (Mn), pyrope (Al, Mg), magnetite (Fe), chromite (Cr), and metallic vanadium (V). Detection limits of electron microprobe analyses (wt.%): Al—0.05, Si—0.05, Mn—0.01, Fe—0.01, Zn—0.01, Ti—0.02, Cr—0.02, V—0.02. Element distribution, morphology, and intraphase heterogeneity were also determined using a LEO-1450 scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with a Bruker XFlash-5010 Nano GmbH (Bruker, Bremen, Germany) energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) and an SEM Hitachi S-3400N (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a EDS Oxford X-Max 20 (Oxford Instruments, Abington, UK). An EBSD diffraction picture was obtained on an SEM Hitachi S-3400N (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an EBSD-detector Oxford HKL Nordlys Nano (Oxford Instruments, Abington, UK): accelerating voltage 20 kV, beam current 1 nA, acquisition time 16 s. Oxford Instruments AZtecHKL analysis software was used to identify minerals. Preparation of the sample surface for EBSD was made on an Oxford IonFab 300 by argon plasma for 10 min. Registration of reflection spectrum was conducted on an MSF-21 microspectrofotometer (USSR), monochromator slit 0.4 mm, zond 0.1 mm, registration of spectrum is automatic per 20 nm, range 400–700 nm, standard SiC (Reflexionsstandard −474251, № 545, Germany). Microhardness measures were taken using a PMT-3 device on a 50-g load.

4. Results

Coulsonite in massive sulfide ores of the Bragino occurrence is one of the most common vanadium minerals. Three varieties of coulsonite were defined based on the chemical composition, some physical properties and mineral association: coulsonite-I, coulsonite-II, and coulsonite-III. These varieties are briefly described in (Table 1).

4.1. Coulsonite-I

Coulsonite-I was found in massive pyrrhotite ores of type I. It consists of a hexagonal and monocline pyrrhotite mixture (80% of ores) (1 in Figure 2a–c) and microveins of hexagonal pyrrhotite (2 in Figure 2a,b). In the oxidation zone, pyrrhotite is replaced by a pyrite-marcasite intergrowth with “bird’s eye” structure (up to 18% of this ore) (3 in Figure 2a–c). The mineral composition of this ore type is rather poor, 2% is accessory minerals: chalcopyrite, galena, molybdenite, coulsonite, V-bearing phlogopite and clinochlore intergrowth, Sc-V-bearing senaite, and W-V-bearing rutile [23].
Coulsonite-I occurs as octahedral crystals and crystal clusters up to 500 µm (Figure 2d–f). It is saturated by a sulfide inclusion (Figure 2f) or V-W-bearing rutile. In reflected light, coulsonite-I is grey, the internal reflection is not observed (Figure 2f). The chemical composition of coulsonite-I is given in (Table 2). It is characterized by uniformly high content of Cr2O3 (20–30 wt.%), ZnO (up to 4.5 wt.%) and MnO (2.8 wt.%) and low content of FeO. The calculation of coulsonite-I formula and distribution of Fe2+ and Fe3+ according to stoichiometry in the spinel group minerals and charge balance indicates that coulsonite-I does not contain Fe3+. That is perfectly demonstrated in a triangle diagram of cation distribution in the structural positions A-B (Figure 3a,b), where coulsonite-I forms a separate group of points.
Microhardness of coulsonite-I is 743 kg/mm2 (average of 15 measurements), which exceeds microhardness of coulsonite in the literature (338 kg/mm2) [8,34]. A coefficient of coulsonite-I reflection (Table 3) significantly differs from coulsonite from the Pyrrhotite Ravine, which is close to standard coulsonite [8].

4.2. Coulsonite-II

Coulsonite-II was found in relics of quartz–albite veins from massive pyrrhotite ores of type II (Figure 4a,b) and the massive pyrite ore. The relics have a zonal and banded structure where their axial band is composed of albite and two marginal bands built up by quartz. Only the albite axial band hosts a Cr-Sc-V-bearing mineralization (Figure 4c,d).
Coulsonite-II forms thin tabular (needle-like in a section) crystals and crystal clusters (Figure 4e,f), dimensions of which vary from 2 × 10 to 10 × 30 µm. Crystals of coulsonite-II are usually randomly located in albite, yet, in some cases, some orientation is observed. In association with coulsonite-II roscoelite, V-bearing muscovite, thortveitite, Sc-V-bearing crichtonite group minerals, rutile, byrudite and tivanite were defined. In reflected light, coulsonite-II is light grey, and the enrichment of crystals in TiO2 has much higher coefficient of reflection and cream tint (Figure 4f).
The chemical composition of coulsonite-II (Table 2) is rather similar to coulsonite-III. This is characterized by a higher content of FeO and a lower content of V2O3 and Cr2O3. A content of ZnO does not exceed 3 wt.%, while MnO is under 0.5 wt.%. For some crystals of coulsonite-II, an extremely high TiO2 content was established (up to 18 wt.%). These crystals are clearly visible in BSE images (Figure 4e) and reflected polarized light photos (Figure 4f). After [35], a maximum content of TiO2 (3 wt.%) in coulsonite was described for that from Kalgoorli. Due to its unusual morphology and chemical composition, coulsonite-II is similar to nolanite described in [36]. It is impossible to measure microhardness and precise value of the reflection coefficient due to a small size of coulsonite-II crystals. For the same reason, we have only an EDS analysis of coulsonite-II. For coulsonite-II, the EBSD confirmation method was used (Figure 5). It was based on comparison of data obtained for coulsonite-II and taken from AMCSD [37] CIF data for coulsonite (0015774), nolanite (0000910) in an Oxford Instruments AZtecHKL analysis software where coulsonite was confirmed on 12 bands.

4.3. Coulsonite-III

Coulsonite-III is the most common variety in sulfide ores of the Bragino occurrence. It was found in massive pyrrhotite ores of type II and massive pyrite ores. Massive pyrrhotite ores of type II differ from the type I by a strong cracking, presence of relics of quartz–albite veins, hexagonal pyrrhotite predominance (Figure 6a,b), and more diversified mineral composition [23]. The major minerals of this ore type are pyrrhotite, chalcopyrite, sphalerite, pyrite, and marcasite. Arsenopyrite, molybdenite, galena, cobaltite, altaite, hessite, volynskite, rucklidgeite, kotulskite, gold, etc. were defined as minor and rare minerals. The massive pyrite ore consists of coarse-grained pyrite (Figure 6a) and pyrrhotite, chalcopyrite, sphalerite, quartz, albite and siderite in interstitial space. Pyrite contains a lot of inclusions of individual minerals (sulfides, oxides, quartz, etc.) and a mineral association observed only in these pyrite ores [23].
The morphology of coulsonite-III is extremely diverse. It forms individual corroded octahedral crystals up to 150 µm, crystal clusters, and intergrowths with other minerals. For coulsonite-III, four separate mineral associations are typical: 1—coulsonite-III containing relics of chromite, with an intergrowth with V-bearing ilmenite (up to 3 wt.% V2O3) (Figure 6c–i) [9]. Relics of chromite in the central part of coulsonite-III crystals are perfectly distinguished in the reflected light image and element mapping (Figure 6e), however, are not observed in the BSE images because of the proximity of vanadium and chromium atomic mass. It has a lower coefficient of reflection (Table 3), the V2O3 and Cr2O3 contents are 22 wt.% and 32 wt.%, respectively. Ilmenite is saturated in a ferberite inclusion (Figure 6e,i). 2—coulsonite-III in an intergrowth with W-V-bearing rutile and ilmenite (and kyzylkumite only in the pyrite ores) (Figure 6j). 3—coulsonite-III surrounded by a V-bearing magnetite rim V2O3 up to 1.5 wt.% (Figure 6k). 4—coulsonite-III with nolanite in the marginal area or tin inclusion only in the pyrite ores (Figure 7).
The microhardness of coulsonite-III is 577 kg/mm2. The reflection coefficient of coulsonite-III is given in Table 3.

5. Discussion

5.1. Genesis of Coulsonite of the Bragino Occurrence

The vanadium mineralization of the Bragino occurrence was found only in massive sulfide ores and was not established in the host rock. The vanadium mineralization genesis is partially discussed elsewhere [22]. Findings of vanadium oxides or silicates in massive sulfide ores are rather unusual. Formation of vanadium mineralization requires two pre-conditions: (1) primary enrichment of the host rock in vanadium and (2) high degree of metamorphism (up to amphibolite facies). These conditions are met both for the Bragino occurrence and for other objects in which vanadium mineralization was described [9,10,11,12,13,22]. In dispersed state, vanadium is located in sulfide in volcanic-hosted massive sulfide (VHMS) complexes [38]. The source of vanadium can be an organic suspension, which absorbs it from seawater and precipitates with sulfides captured by them [39]. After [40,41,42,43], the metamorphism and secondary hydrothermal stage of primary (where pyrite is the main mineral) massive sulfide ores led to the remobilization and redistribution of elements located in sulfides in the dispersed state and to their concentration in newly formed sulfide minerals or in their own mineral phases. The metamorphic recrystallization of sulfides can possibly form vanadium oxides containing coulsonite-I and coulsonite-III.
The findings of V-Sc-bearing minerals in relics of primary hydrothermal veins of the Bragino sulfide ores suggest that these veins were formed at a hydrothermal event that preceded the metamorphic recrystallization of the sulfide ores and that coulsonite-II is of a hydrothermal origin.

5.2. Chemical Composition of Coulsonite of the Bragino Occurrence

The chemical composition of coulsonite of the Bragino occurrence has several special features distinguishing it from the one of the Pyrrhotite Valley or Vihanti, which are the nearest similar objects. It is related to the genesis of ores enclosing vanadium mineralization and their metamorphic alteration.
Coulsonite-I and coulsonite-III have the similar genesis but they were established in different types of pyrrhotite ores of the Bragino occurrence, and clearly differ in their chemical composition (Table 2, Figure 3). The chemical composition of coulsonite is different because of the wide isomorphic substitution in both structural positions.
In tetrahedral A-position, the main cation is Fe2+ (more than 0.8 apfu) in all coulsonite varieties, Zn and Mn admixtures are more substantial in coulsonite-I (Figure 3a). In octahedral B-position, the main cation is V3+ mainly substituted by Cr3+ and Fe3+ (Figure 3b), Al, Ti, Si are present in small amounts. The vanadium content is approximately the same within coulsonite varieties (about 1 apfu). In B-position of coulsonite-I, V3+ is mainly substituted by Cr3+, Fe3+ is absent according to formulae calculation. In coulsonite-II and coulsonite-III the inverse dependence between Cr3+ and Fe3+ content is observed. The chemical composition of coulsonite-II is similar to coulsonite-III, yet some crystals of coulsonite-II have the high TiO2 content (up to 18 wt.%). Ti probably substitutes Cr3+ and Fe3+ (Table 2).
A massive chromium admixture could be associated with mafic–ultramafic volcanism. The central part of some crystals is enriched in chrome, and can indicate a presence of chromite in primary ores like in the Urals, for example [40] and its subsequent substitution by coulsonite.
After [43], in pyrrhotite ores of massive sulfide deposits embedded in rocks metamorphosed until the amphibolite facies level, there are not only metamorphic alteration of iron sulfides, but significant changes in mineral occurrence forms of zinc, barium, and other elements. These changes in zinc mineralogy were studied in pyrite deposits of the Appalachian and Scandinavian Caledonides, where a substitution of sphalerite by zinc-bearing spinels and silicates was observed [44]. Zinc started accumulating in coulsonite due to metamorphic transformations of sphalerite-bearing ores and redistribution of zinc. Each vanadium spinel has a chrome analogue: chromite FeCr2O4—coulsonite FeV2O4, magnesiochromite MgCr2O4—magnesiocoulsonite MgV2O4, manganochromite MnV2O4—vuorelainenite MnV2O4. Zincochromite ZnCr2O4 still does not have a vanadium analogue, yet, the ability of zinc to substitute iron in coulsonite can help to discover this mineral in massive sulfide ores rich in sphalerite.
It is noted that the Cr content in coulsonite has a direct impact on its physical properties. The high content of Cr2O3 (up to 20 wt.% and higher) leads to microhardness being doubled, on average. Reflection coefficient increases up to 550 nm and decreases after (Table 3). In polarized light, coulsonite enriched by chromium looks darker (Figure 6c,d). A difference between the Cr content in the dark central part and the brown boundary part of the crystal in (Figure 6c,d) is ca. 10 wt.%.

6. Conclusions

Findings of vanadium spinels are typical of the Paleoproterozoic high metamorphic VHMS ores like the Vihanty, Outokumpu or Kola region deposits. Three varieties of coulsonite were defined and described in the Bragino massive sulfide ores in the Kola region, Russia based on their chemical composition, some physical properties, and mineral association: coulsonite-I, coulsonite-II, and coulsonite-III. Wide variations in the chemical composition of coulsonite are caused by the isomorphic substitution between V, Cr and Fe. Coulsonite-I forms octahedral crystal clusters of up to 500 µm, and has a uniformly high content of Cr2O3, ZnO, and MnO. Coulsonite-II was found in relics of quartz–albite veins in association with other vanadium minerals. It forms a thin tabular shape and is enriched in TiO2. Coulsonite-III is the most common variety in massive sulfide ores of the Bragino occurrence. Coulsonite-III forms octahedral crystals and crystal clusters, intergrowths with V-bearing ilmenite, W-V-bearing rutile, etc. In some crystals of coulsonite-III, relics of chromite are observed. The Cr admixture mainly has a direct influence on coulsonite physical properties, such as microhardness and reflection coefficient. Increasing the content of Cr2O3 leads to microhardness being doubled, on average. Three varieties of coulsonite were formed due to metamorphic and hydrothermal alteration of the primary massive sulfide ore, which contains vanadium in a dispersed state in sulfide. In addition, it should be noted that conventional BSE images do not reveal the features of the distribution of Cr and V in Cr-V spinels, and elemental mapping should be used.

Funding

This research was funded by the Geological Institute of the Kola Science Centre of the RAS in the context of scientific themes 0226-2019-0053.

Acknowledgments

The author thanks A.V. Voloshin (GI KSC RAS) for consultation, A.V. Bazai (GI KSC RAS) and N.S. Vlasenko, V.V. Shilovskikh from the Resource Center “Geomodel” of the Saint Petersburg State University for helping in mineralogical investigations. The author is grateful to two anonymous reviewers and the Editor for their help on improving this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Radtke, A.S. Coulsonite, FeV2O4, a spinel-type mineral from Lovelock, Nevada. Am. Mineral. 1962, 47, 1284–1291. [Google Scholar]
  2. Harris, C.; Hlongwane, W.; Gule, N.; Scheepers, R. Origin of tanzanite and associated gemstone mineralization at Merelani, Tanzania. S. Afr. J. Geol. 2014, 117, 15–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Olivier, B. The Geology and petrology of the Merelani tanzanite deposit, NE Tanzania. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa, 2006; 453p. [Google Scholar]
  4. Reznitsky, L.Z.; Skliarov, E.V.; Ushchapovskaia, Z.F. Natalyite Na(V,Cr)Si2O6-A new chromium-vanadium pyroxene from Slyudianka. Proc. Russ. Mineral. Soc. 1985, 114, 630–635. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  5. Reznitsky, L.Z.; Sklyarov, E.V.; Ushchapovskaya, Z.F. Magnesiocoulsonite MgV2O4-A new mineral species in the spinel group. Proc. Russ. Mineral. Soc. 1995, 124, 91–98. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  6. Reznitsky, L.Z.; Sklyarov, E.V.; Armbruster, T.; Ushchapovskaya, Z.F.; Galuskin, E.V.; Polekhovsky, Y.S.; Barash, I.G. The new mineral oxyvanite V3O5 and the oxyvanite-berdesinskiite V2TiO5 isomorphic join in metamorphic rocks of Sludyanka complex (South Baikal region). Proc. Russ. Mineral. Soc. 2009, 138, 70–81. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  7. Cametti, G.; Armbruster, T.; Reznitsky, L.Z.; Sklyarov, E.V.; Della Ventura, G. Crystal structure and crystal-chemistry of vanadio-pargasite: A new amphibole from southern Lake Baikal, Siberia, Russia. Eur. J. Mineral. 2018, 30, 981–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Karpov, S.M.; Voloshin, A.V.; Savchenko, Y.E.; Selivanova, E.A.; Polekhovsky, Y.S. Coulsonite in the Pyrrhotite Canyon deposit (Kola peninsula): The first find in Russia. Dokl. Earth Sci. 2012, 446, 1064–1066. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kompanchenko, A.A.; Voloshin, A.V.; Bazai, A.V.; Polekhovsky, Y.S. Evolution of Cr-V mineralization in volcanic massive sulfide ore of Bragino occurences (South Pechenga structure zone, the Kola region) on example of spinel group minerals. Proc. Russ. Miner. Soc. 2017, 5, 44–59. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  10. Sergeeva, N.E.; Eremin, N.I.; Dergachev, A.L. Vanadium mineralization in ore of the Vihanti massive sulfide base-metal deposit, Finland. Dokl. Earth Sci. 2011, 436, 210–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Höller, W.; Stumpfl, E.F. Cr-V oxides from the Rampura Agucha Pb-Zn-(Ag) deposit, Rajasthan, India. Can. Miner. 1995, 33, 745–752. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zakrzewski, M.A.; Burke, E.A.J.; Lustenhouwer, W.J. Vourelainenite, a new spinel, and associated minerals from the Sätra (Doverstorp) pyrite deposit, central Sweden. Can. Miner. 1982, 20, 281–290. [Google Scholar]
  13. Long, J.V.P.; Vourelainen, Y.; Kuovo, O. Karelianite, a new vanadium mineral. Am. Miner. 1963, 48, 33–41. [Google Scholar]
  14. Rouhunkoski, P. On the geology and geochemistry of the Vihanti zinc ore deposit, Finland. Bull. Comm. Geol. Finl. 1968, 236, 121. [Google Scholar]
  15. Rauhamäki, E.; Mäkelä, T.; Isomäki, O.P. Geology of the Vihanti mine. In Precambrian Ores of Finland. Guide to Excursions 078 A + C, Part 2 (Finland), Proceedings of the 26th International Geological Congress, Paris, France 7 July 1980; Häkli, T.A., Ed.; Geological Survey of Finland: Espoo, Finland, 1980; pp. 14–24. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gandhi, S.M.; Paliwal, H.V.; Bhatnagar, S.N. Geology and ore reserve estimates of Rampura Agucha lead zinc deposit, Bhilwara District. J. Geol. Soc. India 1984, 25, 689–705. [Google Scholar]
  17. Deb, M.; Thorpe, R.L.; Cumming, G.L.; Wagner, P.A. Age, source and stratigraphic implications of Pb isotope data for conformable, sediment-hosted, base metal deposits in the Proterozoic Aravalli-Delhi orogenic belt, northwestern India. Precambrian Res. 1989, 43, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Deb, M. Lithogeochemistry of rocks around Rampura Agucha massive zinc sulfide ore-body, NWIndia–implications for the evolution of a Proterozoic “Aulakogen”. In Metallogeny Related to Tectonics of the Proterozoic Mobile Belts; Sarkar, S.C., Ed.; Balkhema: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1992; pp. 1–35. [Google Scholar]
  19. Höller, W.; Gandhi, S.M. Origin of tourmaline and oxide minerals from the metamorphosed Rampura Agucha Zn-Pb-(Ag) deposit, Rajasthan, India. Miner. Petrol. 1997, 60, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Allen, R.L.; Lunström, I.; Ripa, M.; Simeonov, A.; Christofferson, H. Facies analysis of a 1.9 Ga, contintental margin, back-arc, felsic caldera province with diverse Zn-Pb-Ag-(Cu-Au) sulfide and Feoxide deposits, Bergslagen region, Sweden. Econ. Geol. 1996, 91, 979–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Peltola, E. Origin of Precambrian Copper Sulfides of the Outokumpu Disctrict, Finland. Econ. Geol. 1978, 73, 461–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kompanchenko, A.A.; Voloshin, A.V.; Balagansky, V.V. Vanadium Mineralization in the Kola Region, Fennoscandian Shield. Minerals 2018, 8, 474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kompanchenko, A.A.; Voloshin, A.V.; Bazai, A.V. Mineral composition of paleoproterozoic metamorphosed massive sulfide ore of the Kola region on example of Bragino occurrence in South Pechenga. Proc. Russ. Miner. Soc. 2019, 5, 74–88. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Melezhik, V.A.; Sturt, B.A. General geology and evolutionary history of the early Proterozoic Polmak-Pasvik-Pechenga-Imandra/Varzuga-Ust’Ponoy Greenstone Belt in the north-eastern Baltic Shield. Earth Sci. Rev. 1994, 36, 205–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Glebovitsky, V.A. (Ed.) Early Precambrian of the Baltic Shield; Nauka: Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 2005; p. 711. ISBN 5-02-024950-5. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  26. Melezhik, V.A.; Prave, A.R.; Hanski, E.J.; Fallick, A.E.; Lepland, A.; Kump, L.R.; Srauss, H. (Eds.) The Palaeoproterozoic of Fennoscandia as Context for the Fennoscandian Arctic Russia—Drilling Early Earth Project. In Reading the Archive of Earth’s Oxygenation; Springer: Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; p. 490. [Google Scholar]
  27. Mints, M.V.; Dokukina, K.A.; Konilov, A.N.; Philippova, I.B.; Zlobin, V.L.; Babayants, P.S.; Belousova, E.A.; Blokh, V.I.; Bogina, M.M.; Bush, D.A.; et al. East European Craton: Early Precambrian History and 3D Models of Deep Crustal Structure; Geological Society of America Special Paper 510; Geological Society of America: Boulder, CO, USA, 2015; p. 433. [Google Scholar]
  28. Skuf’in, P.K.; Theart, H.F.J. Geochemical and tectono-magmatic evolution of the volcano-sedimentary rocks of Pechenga and other greenstone fragments within the Kola Greenstone Belt, Russia. Precambrian Res. 2005, 141, 1–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Skuf’in, P.K.; Elizarov, D.V.; Zhavkov, V.A. Geological and geochemical pecularities of volcanics of the the South Pechenga structural zone. Proc. Murm. State Technol. Univ. 2009, 12, 416–435. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  30. Pouret, O.; Dia, A. Vanadium. In Encyclopedia of Geochemistry; White, W.M., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  31. Balashov, Y.A. Paleoproterozoic geochronology of the Pechenga-Varzuga structure, Kola Peninsula. Petrology 1996, 4, 3–25. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  32. Akhmedov, A.M.; Voronyaeva, L.V.; Pavlov, V.A.; Krupenik, V.A.; Kuznetsov, V.A.; Sveshnikova, K.Y. The gold content of the South Pechenga structural zone (the Kola Peninsula): Types of manifestations and prospects for identifying industrial gold contents. Reg. Geol. Metallog. 2004, 20, 143–165. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  33. Whitney, D.L.; Evans, B.W. Abbreviations for names of rock-forming minerals. Am. Miner. 2010, 95, 185–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Anthony, J.W.; Bideaux, R.A.; Bladh, K.W.; Nichols, M.C. (Eds.) Handbook of Mineralogy; Mineralogical Society of America: Chantilly, VA, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  35. Spiridonov, E.M. Titanium coulsonite from Kalgoorlie deposit. Dokl. AS USSR 1979, 245, 447–449. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  36. Gatehouse, B.M.; Grey, I.E.; Nickel, E.H. The crystal chemistry of nolanite, (V,Fe,Ti,Al)10O14(OH)2, from Kalgoorlie, Western Australia. Am. Miner. 1983, 68, 833–839. [Google Scholar]
  37. Downs, R.T.; Hall-Wallace, M. The American Mineralogist Crystal Structure Database. Am. Miner. 2003, 88, 247–250. [Google Scholar]
  38. Maslennikov, V.V.; Ayupova, N.R.; Maslennikova, S.P.; Tret’yakov, G.A.; Melekestzeva, I.Y. Toxic Elements in Massive Sulfide Systems; Institute of Mineralogy, the Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences: Miass, Russia, 2014; p. 340. ISBN 978-5-7691-2411-2. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  39. Butler, I.B.; Nesbitt, R.W. Trace element distribution in the chalcopyrite wall of a black smoker chimney: Insight from laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS). Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1999, 167, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zaykov, V.V.; Maslennikov, V.V.; Zaykova, E.V.; Herrington, R. Ore-Formation and Ore-Facies Analyses of Massive Sulphide Deposits of the Ural Paleoocean; Institute of Mineralogy, the Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences: Miass, Russia, 2001; p. 315. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  41. Vikentiev, I.V. Precious metal and telluride mineralogy of large volcanic-hosted massive sulfide deposits in the Ural. Miner. Petrol. 2006, 87, 305–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Vikent’ev, I.V.; Yudovskaya, M.A.; Moloshag, V.P. Speciation of noble metals and conditions of their concentration in massive sulfide ores of the Urals. Geol. Ore Depos. 2006, 48, 77–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Moloshag, V.P.; Grabezhev, A.I.; Vikent’ev, I.V.; Gulyaeva, T.Y. Ore formation facies of massive sulphide ore deposits and copper-gold-porphyry deposits of Urals. Litosfera 2004, 2, 30–51. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  44. Spry, P.G.; Scott, S.D. Zincian spinel and staurolite in the Appalachians and Scandinavian caledonides. Can. Miner. 1986, 24, 147–163. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Geological map of the South Pechenga structural zone and position of the Bragino occurrence (modified after [22,24,26,28,32]).
Figure 1. Geological map of the South Pechenga structural zone and position of the Bragino occurrence (modified after [22,24,26,28,32]).
Minerals 10 00843 g001
Figure 2. Coulsonite-I (Cou-I) in massive pyrrhotite ores of type I (mPo-I): (a)—sample of mPo-I (1—the main mass of hexagonal and monocline pyrrhotite; 2—microveins of hexagonal pyrrhotite; 3—oxidation zone); (b,c)—mPo-I in a polished section (reflected light images); (d)—intergrowth of coulsonite crystals in mPo-I (SE image); (e,f)—metacrystal of Cou-I in the main mass of pyrrhotite (reflected light images). The mineral abbreviations hereafter are according to [33], apart from those introduced by the author for rare minerals. SE—secondary electron.
Figure 2. Coulsonite-I (Cou-I) in massive pyrrhotite ores of type I (mPo-I): (a)—sample of mPo-I (1—the main mass of hexagonal and monocline pyrrhotite; 2—microveins of hexagonal pyrrhotite; 3—oxidation zone); (b,c)—mPo-I in a polished section (reflected light images); (d)—intergrowth of coulsonite crystals in mPo-I (SE image); (e,f)—metacrystal of Cou-I in the main mass of pyrrhotite (reflected light images). The mineral abbreviations hereafter are according to [33], apart from those introduced by the author for rare minerals. SE—secondary electron.
Minerals 10 00843 g002
Figure 3. Triangle diagrams of cation distribution in coulsonite from different massive sulfide deposits: (a)—in position A; (b)—in position B (according to the main structural formula AB2O4 of the spinel group minerals).
Figure 3. Triangle diagrams of cation distribution in coulsonite from different massive sulfide deposits: (a)—in position A; (b)—in position B (according to the main structural formula AB2O4 of the spinel group minerals).
Minerals 10 00843 g003
Figure 4. Coulsonite-II (Cou-II) in relics of quartz–albite (Qz-Ab) veins: (a)—relics of Qz-Ab veins in the sample of massive pyrrhotite ores of type II (mPo-II) (Rzn—rozenite); (bd)—relics of Qz-Ab veins (dark grey) in a polished section of mPo-II (reflected light images); (e,f)—Cou-II in the BSE image (e) and reflected light images (f). Msc—muscovite. BSE—back-scattering electron.
Figure 4. Coulsonite-II (Cou-II) in relics of quartz–albite (Qz-Ab) veins: (a)—relics of Qz-Ab veins in the sample of massive pyrrhotite ores of type II (mPo-II) (Rzn—rozenite); (bd)—relics of Qz-Ab veins (dark grey) in a polished section of mPo-II (reflected light images); (e,f)—Cou-II in the BSE image (e) and reflected light images (f). Msc—muscovite. BSE—back-scattering electron.
Minerals 10 00843 g004
Figure 5. Coulsonite-II (Cou-II) with a different TiO2 content: (a)—reflected light images; (b)—BSE image; (c,d)—EBSD image for Cou-II. Ab—albite.
Figure 5. Coulsonite-II (Cou-II) with a different TiO2 content: (a)—reflected light images; (b)—BSE image; (c,d)—EBSD image for Cou-II. Ab—albite.
Minerals 10 00843 g005
Figure 6. Coulsonite-III (Cou-III) in the massive pyrrhotite ore of type II (mPo-II): (a)—polished sample of mPo-II (Py—pyrite; Rzn—rozenite); (b)—mPo-II in a polished section (reflected light images), (c,d)—coulsonite (brown) with a relic of chromite (Chr, dark grey) in mPo-II; (reflected light images); (e)—BSE image of coulsonite from (c,d); (fh)—element mapping of coulsonite from (c,d); (i,j)—coulsonite-III intergrowth with V-bearing ilmenite (Ilm) (i) and rutile(Rt)-ilmenite aggregate (j); (k)—rim of magnetite around coulsonite-III. Ab—albite, Qz—quartz, Mrc—marcasite, Sd—siderite, Sp—sphalerite.
Figure 6. Coulsonite-III (Cou-III) in the massive pyrrhotite ore of type II (mPo-II): (a)—polished sample of mPo-II (Py—pyrite; Rzn—rozenite); (b)—mPo-II in a polished section (reflected light images), (c,d)—coulsonite (brown) with a relic of chromite (Chr, dark grey) in mPo-II; (reflected light images); (e)—BSE image of coulsonite from (c,d); (fh)—element mapping of coulsonite from (c,d); (i,j)—coulsonite-III intergrowth with V-bearing ilmenite (Ilm) (i) and rutile(Rt)-ilmenite aggregate (j); (k)—rim of magnetite around coulsonite-III. Ab—albite, Qz—quartz, Mrc—marcasite, Sd—siderite, Sp—sphalerite.
Minerals 10 00843 g006
Figure 7. Coulsonite-III (Cou) crystal with nolanite (Nol) in the marginal area from massive pyrite ores: (a)—reflected light images; (b)—the same image rotated 90°; (c)—BSE images. Ab—albite, Ccp—chalcopyrite, Msc—muscovite, Py—pyrite.
Figure 7. Coulsonite-III (Cou) crystal with nolanite (Nol) in the marginal area from massive pyrite ores: (a)—reflected light images; (b)—the same image rotated 90°; (c)—BSE images. Ab—albite, Ccp—chalcopyrite, Msc—muscovite, Py—pyrite.
Minerals 10 00843 g007
Table 1. Comparison of coulsonite varieties in massive sulfide ore of the Kola region.
Table 1. Comparison of coulsonite varieties in massive sulfide ore of the Kola region.
Characteristics/Varieties of CoulsoniteOre TypeMorphologyMineral ParagenesisSpecial Features of Chemical CompositionPhysical PropertiesAlleged Genesis
Coulsonite [8]Banded pyrrhotite oreCorroded crystals and growth up to 100 µmRim of mukhinite or/and goldmanite, V-bearing epidote and grossularHigh Mn content, low Fe and Cr contentMicrohardness close to reference, coefficient of reflection accepted by author of this work as a standartMetamorphic
coulsonite-IIIMassive pyrrhotite ore of type II and massive pyrite oreVarious, crystals and growth up to 100–150 µm1. W-V-bearing rutile, ilmenite
2. V-bearing ilmenite, ferberite
3. Rim of magnetite
4. Nolanite
Minimal Mn content, high variation of Cr, Fe and V contentIncreased microhardness 577 kg/mm2, coefficient of reflection lower than that to coulsonite Metamorphic
coulsonite-IIRelics of quartz–albite veins in the massive pyrrhotite ore of type II and massive pyriteLamellar (needle-like in slice) crystals and growth up to 10 × 30 µmV-bearing muscovite, roscoelite, crictonite group minerals, rutile, byrudite, tivanite, thortveitite, sideriteIncreased Fe content, and Ti in some crystalsHigh-titanium crystals have the highest coefficient of reflectionHydrothermal
coulsonite-IMassive pyrrhotite ore type 1Octahedral crystals and growth up to 300–500 µmW-V-bearing rutile, V-bearing senaite, V-bearing phlogopiteIncreased Zn and Mn content, almost complete absence of Fe3+, uniformly high Cr content High microhardness 743 kg/mm2, low chromite-like coefficient of reflectionMetamorphic
Table 2. Chemical composition (Wavelength Dispersive Spectrometer (WDS), wt.%) of coulsonite from the massive sulfide ore of the Kola region.
Table 2. Chemical composition (Wavelength Dispersive Spectrometer (WDS), wt.%) of coulsonite from the massive sulfide ore of the Kola region.
SamplesCoulsonite-ICoulsonite-IICoulsonite-IIICoulsonite *
Max CrMin CrAv (22)Max TiMin TiAv
(9)
Max CrMin CrAv (36)
SiO2n.d.n.d.0.01n.d.n.d.n.d.0.05n.d.0.01n.d.
TiO20.290.440.2218.770.538.770.54n.d.0.90n.d.
Al2O30.99n.d.1.020.621.641.152.460.490.89n.d.
Cr2O332.8720.2124.997.0711.579.0528.047.1110.799.90
V2O332.9146.1439.9840.7040.0339.4728.5150.0843.3855.60
FeO25.6927.3327.2131.3042.8638.6635.8239.6140.8325.63
ZnO4.483.323.790.723.112.124.122.042.322.74
MnO2.342.552.31n.d.0.180.100.09n.d.0.025.08
Total99.5799.9999.5399.1899.9299.3299.6399.3399.1599.06 **
apfubased on three cations and four oxygens
Si------0.002---
Ti0.010.01-0.500.02-0.02---
Al0.04--0.030.07-0.110.02--
Cr0.970.59-0.200.35-0.840.22-0.29
V0.981.38-1.151.24-0.861.54-1.67
Fe3+-0.02-0.130.32-0.170.22--
Fe2+0.840.86-0.980.92-0.890.96-0.81
Zn0.100.07-0.020.08-0.110.04-0.08
Mn0.060.07--0.01-0.003--0.16
Note. av ()—average content (quantity of analysis); n.d.—element is not detected; * data after [8]; ** +MgO—0.08 wt.% and CaO—0.03 wt.%. apfu – atoms per formula units. Fe2+ and Fe3+ calculation based on stoichiometry of the spinel group minerals and charge balance. Dash – apfu <0.01 or absent for average content.
Table 3. Coefficients of reflection of the Cr-V spinel group minerals from the Kola region.
Table 3. Coefficients of reflection of the Cr-V spinel group minerals from the Kola region.
Λ, nm12345
40016.1917.7115.7814.9316.64
42016.1217.2415.7915.0116.44
44016.0916.8515.8115.0816.28
46016.0616.615.8315.1416.21
48016.0416.3915.8515.216.18
50016.0116.2415.8815.2516.18
52015.9816.1415.9315.316.23
54015.9516.0715.9815.3416.3
56015.9315.9816.0115.3716.38
58015.9115.9216.0615.416.46
60015.8815.8616.1215.4216.54
62015.8915.816.2115.4516.67
64015.915.7416.3315.4816.83
66015.9415.7416.4515.4917.03
68016.0315.816.5615.5117.26
70016.1315.9916.6615.5317.5
Note. 1—chromite in coulsonite-III. 2—coulsonite-I. 3—coulsonite-III. 4—coulsonite-III with the minimum Cr content. 5—coulsonite after [8].

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kompanchenko, A.A. Coulsonite FeV2O4—A Rare Vanadium Spinel Group Mineral in Metamorphosed Massive Sulfide Ores of the Kola Region, Russia. Minerals 2020, 10, 843. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10100843

AMA Style

Kompanchenko AA. Coulsonite FeV2O4—A Rare Vanadium Spinel Group Mineral in Metamorphosed Massive Sulfide Ores of the Kola Region, Russia. Minerals. 2020; 10(10):843. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10100843

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kompanchenko, Alena A. 2020. "Coulsonite FeV2O4—A Rare Vanadium Spinel Group Mineral in Metamorphosed Massive Sulfide Ores of the Kola Region, Russia" Minerals 10, no. 10: 843. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10100843

APA Style

Kompanchenko, A. A. (2020). Coulsonite FeV2O4—A Rare Vanadium Spinel Group Mineral in Metamorphosed Massive Sulfide Ores of the Kola Region, Russia. Minerals, 10(10), 843. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10100843

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop