Next Article in Journal
Exploring the Nexus between Displacement and Land Administration: The Case of Rwanda
Next Article in Special Issue
Linking Arable Crop Occurrence with Site Conditions by the Use of Highly Resolved Spatial Data
Previous Article in Journal
Rent-Seeking Practices, Local Resource Curse, and Social Conflict in Uganda’s Emerging Oil Economy
Article Menu
Issue 4 (April) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

Valuing Our National Parks: An Ecological Economics Perspective

1
Department of Geography and the Environment, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208, USA
2
School of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 25 March 2019 / Accepted: 26 March 2019 / Published: 29 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Exploring the Relationships between Land Use and Ecosystem Services)
  |  
PDF [6140 KB, uploaded 29 March 2019]
  |  

Abstract

The annual budget for the United States National Park Service was roughly $3 billion in 2016. This is distributed amongst 405 National Parks, 23 national scenic and historic trails, and 60 wild and scenic rivers. Entrance fees and concessions generate millions of dollars in income for the National Park Service; however, this metric fails to account for the total value of the National Parks. In failing to consider the value of the ecosystem services provided by the National Parks, we fail to quantify and appreciate the contributions our parks make to society. This oversight allows us to continue to underfund a valuable part of our natural capital and consequently damage our supporting environment, national heritage, monetary economy, and many of our diverse cultures. We explore a simple benefits transfer valuation of the United States’ national parks using National Land Cover Data from 2011 and ecosystem service values determined by Costanza et al. This produces an estimate suggesting the parks provide $98 billion/year in ecosystem service value. If the natural infrastructure ‘asset’ that is our national park system had a budget comparable to a piece of commercial real estate of this value, the annual budget of the National Park Service would be roughly an order of magnitude larger at something closer to $30 billion rather than $3 billion. View Full-Text
Keywords: National Parks; ecosystem service value; natural capital; Green New Deal National Parks; ecosystem service value; natural capital; Green New Deal
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Sutton, P.C.; Duncan, S.L.; Anderson, S.J. Valuing Our National Parks: An Ecological Economics Perspective. Land 2019, 8, 54.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Land EISSN 2073-445X Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top