Next Article in Journal
Tin Mining and Post-Tin Mining Reclamation Initiatives in Indonesia: With Special Reference to Bangka Belitung Areas
Previous Article in Journal
Land Use and Water Stress as Determinants of Ecosystem Resilience: A Panel Data Analysis of Biodiversity Loss Drivers in European Countries
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

How Do Land Use/Cover Changes Influence Air Quality in Türkiye? A Satellite-Based Assessment

by
Mehmet Ali Çelik
1,*,
Adile Bilik
1,
Muhammed Ernur Akiner
2 and
Dessalegn Obsi Gemeda
3,4
1
Department of Geography, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Igdir University, Igdir 76000, Türkiye
2
Department of Environmental Protection Technologies, Vocational School of Technical Sciences, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07058, Türkiye
3
Department of Natural Resource Management, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Jimma University, Jimma P.O. Box 378, Ethiopia
4
Social-Ecological Systems, Policy and Strategy Lab, Dutse 720101, Nigeria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2025, 14(10), 1945; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14101945
Submission received: 13 August 2025 / Revised: 12 September 2025 / Accepted: 15 September 2025 / Published: 25 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers on Land Use, Impact Assessment and Sustainability)

Abstract

Air pollution critically impacts global health, climate change, and ecosystem balance. In Türkiye, rapid population growth, urban expansion, and industrial activities lead to significant land use and cover changes, negatively affecting air quality. This study examined the relationship between land use and land cover changes and six key pollutants (sulfur dioxide, ozone, aerosol index, carbon dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, and formaldehyde) using TROPOMI/Sentinel-5P and European Space Agency Climate Change Initiative data between 2018 and 2024. Satellite-based remote sensing techniques, MODIS data, land surface temperature, and Normalized Vegetation Index analyses were employed. The findings revealed that nitrogen dioxide and carbon dioxide emissions increase with urban expansion and traffic density in metropolitan areas (Istanbul, Ankara, Izmir), while agriculture and deforestation increase aerosol index levels in inland areas. Additionally, photochemical reactions increased surface ozone in the Mediterranean and Aegean regions. At the same time, sulfur dioxide and formaldehyde concentrations reached high levels in highly industrialized and metropolitan cities such as Istanbul, Ankara, and Izmir. This study highlights the role of green infrastructure in improving air quality and provides data-based recommendations for sustainable land management and urban planning policies.

1. Introduction

Air quality is not just about what people breathe; it shapes health, the climate, food systems, and the balance of ecosystems [1,2,3]. Air quality can contribute to the 3rd goal of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (Good health and well-being). Goal 11: Sustainable cities and communities are also addressed if the air quality is suitable for human beings. The air quality is deteriorating both in developed and developing nations. In Türkiye and worldwide, land use is changing fast [4,5,6,7]. Population, cities, and industries are expanding, and farmland is being pushed harder than ever [8,9,10,11]. These shifts do not happen in a vacuum. They change how heat moves through the environment, increase harmful emissions, and make it harder for polluted air to disperse, especially where land development moves quickly [12,13,14].
Major cities like İstanbul, Ankara, İzmir, and Bursa have seen some of the most intense transformations [15,16,17]. They have spread outward, and rural areas have seen forests cut back and farming practices shift [18,19,20]. Urbanization of forests and agricultural lands disrupts natural air purification, leading to heat islands and increased degradation. The country’s diverse climate and geography create regional disparities. Satellite technologies (TROPOMI, Landsat, and MODIS) allow monitoring of land-atmosphere interactions.
The relationship between land use and land cover changes (LULC) and air quality has been the subject of numerous studies on a global scale. Fang et al. [21] examined the impact of urbanization on air quality in China using spatial regression models and revealed a significant relationship between urban sprawl and air pollution. Similarly, Fu and Tai [22] examined the impact of climate and land cover changes on tropospheric ozone concentrations in East Asia and noted that changes in vegetation play a significant role in air quality. In a study of 659 districts in India, Gao et al. [23] emphasized the importance of urban green spaces in improving air quality.
Studies in the United States reveal similar results. Superczynski and Christopher [24] investigated the relationship between land use and air pollution in Alabama using remote sensing and GIS techniques and found that air quality declined significantly in industrial areas. Li et al. [25] examined the effects of urbanization on regional meteorology and air quality in Southern California and stated that the urban heat island effect increases air pollution.
Studies conducted in Asia highlight the importance of regional dynamics. Vadrevu et al. [26] synthesized the relationship between land use changes and air pollution in Asia and emphasized the importance of regional-scale policy development. Zhu et al. [27] analyzed the correlation between land use/cover changes and air pollutants in Wuyishan, China, and demonstrated the positive impact of forested areas on air quality.
The existing literature lacks an integrated study that systematically examines the relationship between LULC changes and multiple air pollutants nationally and over a long time in Türkiye. Addressing this research gap, this study aims to monitor six key pollutants (Sulfur Dioxide (SO2), Ozone (O3), Aerosol Index (AI), Carbon Dioxide (CO2), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), and Formaldehyde (HCHO)) using the TROPOMI sensor on the Sentinel-5P satellite and satellite data from the ESA Climate Change Initiative for the period 2018–2024. Patterns and potential causal relationships will be revealed by comparing the changes in pollutants over time with land use transformations.
The primary objective of this study is to quantitatively understand the impact of LULC changes on air quality in Türkiye (Figure 1) and to provide evidence-based recommendations for land management strategies that can effectively reduce pollution. The findings will help identify high-risk areas, understand pollutant sources, and provide practical guidance based on sophisticated satellite data for urban planning, agriculture, and environmental protection policies.
This study is the first national-scale study to examine the relationship between land use/land cover changes and air quality in Türkiye using six pollutant parameters (SO2, NO2, CO2, O3, AI, and HCHO) and six years of satellite data. The study’s innovative approach goes beyond traditional air quality monitoring methods and relies on the integrated analysis of multiple satellite datasets (Sentinel-5P, MODIS, Landsat) on the Google Earth Engine platform. This comprehensive methodology, with its ability to simultaneously assess both spatial and temporal dynamics, fills the existing gap in the literature and enables the development of policy recommendations tailored to Türkiye’s unique geographical conditions.

Research Questions

This study is structured around how changes in land use/land cover in Türkiye affect the spatial and temporal distribution of multiple air pollutants. The research is structured around four main themes to explore this fundamental question in depth. First, we examine cause-and-effect relationships such as the contribution of land use intensity to the formation of highly polluted regions, the degree to which urban and industrial sprawl is associated with high pollution levels, and the impact of vegetation loss on air quality. Second, we conduct comparative and spatial analyses, such as differences in land use composition between highly and moderately polluted regions, the spatial distribution of high and low-polluted areas, and the distinct terrain patterns exhibited by rural areas with low air quality compared to urban polluted regions. The third theme focuses on the temporal analysis of land use change dynamics in the most polluted regions of Türkiye during the 2019–2024 period and the role of urban-industrial sprawl in worsening air quality trends. Finally, policy and sustainability implications are explored, such as land management strategies to reduce excessive pollution in urban centers and the potential of green space types such as forests and meadows to improve air quality in polluting hotspots. This comprehensive set of questions aims to fill the gap in the existing literature and produce data-driven, actionable outcomes for policymakers.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Sources and Preprocessing

Different datasets were used for this study. Data preprocessing approaches were designed based on the multi-satellite data integration methodologies that Ayoobi et al. [28] and Cakmak et al. [29] proposed. The primary data sources of the study consist of atmospheric pollutant data, thermal data, and land cover data. The atmospheric pollutant data include daily measurements of SO2, NO2, CO2, O3, HCHO, and AI obtained from the TROPOMI sensor on the Sentinel-5P satellite at a spatial resolution of 0.01° × 0.01°. Land Surface Temperature (LST) data from the MODIS (MOD11A2) product at a spatial resolution of 1 km and in the form of 8-day composites were used as the thermal data source. Land cover data were obtained from Landsat with a resolution of 30 m and MODIS terrain classification products with a resolution of 500 m.
In the data preprocessing stage, cloud masking algorithm and atmospheric correction methods were applied [30,31]. Especially for TROPOMI data, the Rayleigh correction was applied to minimize scattering effects. The methodological framework of this study is shown in Figure 2.

2.2. Pollutant Column Density Calculation

For the column density calculations of atmospheric pollutants, the basic physical equation used by Yilmaz et al. [32] in their wildfire emissions study was adopted (Equation (1)).
X = N × A × 10 9 μ × g
where N is the number of molecules per unit area (molecules/cm2), obtained directly from TROPOMI L2 products, A is Avogadro’s number (6.022 × 1023 molecules/mol), μ is the molecular weight of the relevant gas (g/mol). For example, NO2 is 46.0055 g/mol, g: Gravitational acceleration (9.81 m/s2), which may vary slightly depending on latitude and altitude.
These calculations were made in parallel for each Google Earth Engine platform pixel, and monthly averages were created.

2.3. LULC Classification

Landsat 8 OLI/TIRS and MODIS MCD12Q1 data provided by USGS Earth Explorer were downloaded for 2023. MODIS [33,34] and Landsat data [35,36] are frequently used in LULC map production of large areas.
Preprocessing was first applied to these data. Atmospheric Correction, Mosaicization, and Clipping were performed in this phase. In the second phase, a classification algorithm was applied to Türkiye, using the CORINE 2018 classes as a reference. Postprocessing included Filtering and Class Merging. Both maps achieved an accuracy of 85%+ to CORINE standards. Using Landsat and MODIS data, the LULC of the study area was classified into six major classes: irrigated agriculture, dry farming, urban, forest, pasture, and water. This land cover classification is essential to compare air quality between urban and non-urban areas.

2.4. Land Surface Temperature (LST) Calculation

The radiance-based transformation algorithm was used to process MODIS LST data. The general formula for the LST is shown in Equation (2) [37].
LST = BT 1 + λ × BT ρ × ln ε 273.15
where LST is the land surface temperature (°C), BT is the radiance temperature (Kelvin) calculated from thermal bands, MODIS bands 31 (10.78–11.28 μm) and 32 (11.77–12.27 μm) were used, λ is the effective wavelength (μm). 11.03 μm for MODIS band 31 and 12.02 μm for band 32, physical constant ρ: h × c/σ = 1.438 × 10−2 mK (Planck’s constant × speed of light/Stefan-Boltzmann constant), ε is the surface emissivity, calculated based on NDVI and calibrated according to land cover type.
Considering the quality control flags in the MODIS products, these calculations were made, and anomalous values were filtered.

2.5. Vegetation Analysis (NDVI)

The Normalized Vegetation Index (NDVI) method, successfully applied by Hussain et al. [38], was used to analyze vegetation changes as seen in Equation (3).
NDVI = ρ NIR ρ Red ρ NIR + ρ Red
where ρNIR is the near-infrared band reflectance value (B5 for Landsat 8, 0.85–0.88 μm), ρRed is the red band reflectance value (B4 for Landsat 8, 0.64–0.67 μm), NDVI values are normalized in the range [−1, 1], with values above 0.3 indicating healthy vegetation.

2.6. Spatial Statistical Modeling

The Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) model was applied to model the relationships between LULC changes and air quality parameters [39]. The general form of the model is seen in Equation (4).
y i = β 0 u i , v i + β k ( u i , v i ) x i k + ε i
where yi is the dependent variable at location i (e.g., NO2 concentration), (ui,vi) are the coordinates of location i (WGS84 projection), β0 is the constant term (intercept), βk is the regression coefficient of the kth independent variable, xik is the Kth coefficient at location i of the independent variable (e.g., urbanization rate), and εi is the error term.
The analysis of the correlation heatmap provides a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between urban area size and air pollution parameters, offering insights into how urban growth affects air quality dynamics.
The results indicate that a strong positive correlation exists between urban area size and NO2 (0.66), O3 (0.72), and CO (0.54). This finding suggests that as cities expand, the concentrations of these pollutants tend to increase significantly. The elevated levels of NO2 are likely associated with higher traffic density, intensified industrial activities, and increased fossil fuel consumption, all more pronounced in larger metropolitan areas such as Istanbul, Ankara, and Izmir. Similarly, O3, which exhibited the highest correlation, is primarily formed through photochemical reactions involving NOX and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The larger the urban area, the more emissions are generated, creating optimal conditions for ozone formation. The moderate correlation between CO and urban area size further reflects the impact of transportation and residential heating on air quality, albeit to a lesser degree than NO2 and O3.
In contrast, a weak negative correlation was observed between urban area size and SO2 (−0.24). This indicates that SO2 concentrations are less dependent on the extent of urbanization and are instead strongly influenced by specific point sources, such as coal-fired power plants and industrial facilities, which may be located outside densely populated urban cores. HCHO displayed almost no correlation (−0.03) with urban area size, implying that its presence is driven by highly localized factors, including biomass burning, agricultural practices, and specific industrial processes, rather than general urban expansion.
Overall, the findings reveal that urban growth is a key driver of air pollution, particularly for NO2, O3, and CO, which are closely linked to transportation and energy consumption patterns. Conversely, SO2 and HCHO concentrations are shaped by localized and industrial sources, requiring targeted and region-specific monitoring and regulation. These results underscore the necessity of integrated urban planning strategies that address the environmental impacts of rapid urbanization. Policies aimed at improving public transportation, promoting renewable energy, and controlling emissions from industrial and traffic sources are essential to mitigating the detrimental effects of urban expansion on air quality. By doing so, sustainable urban development can be fostered while reducing the adverse health and environmental impacts associated with urban-related air pollution (Figure 3).

2.7. Time Series Analysis

For the temporal analysis, data for 2018–2024 were processed using the spatiotemporal correlation analysis method proposed by Mishra and Mathew [40]. This method includes extracting trend components (STL decomposition), seasonality modeling, and residual analysis. Additionally, cross-wavelet analysis was applied to determine the lagged relationships between urban heat island (UHI) and air pollution [41]. A Gaussian kernel function and adaptive bandwidth were used in the model optimization to minimize spatial autocorrelation.

2.8. Validation

The validation process for the study consisted of two stages. In the first stage, ground measurements from 82 air quality monitoring stations belonging to the Ministry of Environment and Urbanization were compared with satellite measurements using Pearson correlation and RMSE metrics. In the second stage, uncertainty values (5–15%) from sensor documentation were integrated into the final results using propagation formulas. This comprehensive methodological approach allowed for the accurate depiction of both regional differences and temporal dynamics. In particular, thanks to the high processing power provided by Google Earth Engine, six years of data across Türkiye could be analyzed at daily resolution.
It should be noted that while the 5–15% uncertainty in the datasets affects the precision of absolute concentration values, it does not undermine the validity of the spatial and temporal trends identified in this study. Key findings, such as seasonal patterns (increases in NO2/SO2 in winter and O3 in summer) and urban-rural differences, are significantly above the uncertainty range. Therefore, while uncertainty affects the precision of quantitative estimates, relative comparisons and trend analyses are less affected, preserving the robustness of the main conclusions.
The RMSE values calculated from the new dataset indicate the agreement between satellite observations and ground-based measurements for each gas type. These results are crucial for identifying which parameters are more reliable and where caution is needed when interpreting satellite data.
For NO2, the RMSE value is 0.000028, which is extremely low. This indicates a firm agreement between satellite and ground-based measurements. Since NO2 is primarily associated with industrial activities, thermal power plants, and heavy traffic, this low error level suggests that satellite data for NO2 can be confidently used for monitoring and modeling air quality, especially in highly industrialized regions such as Zonguldak, Manisa, and Sivas. Such high reliability strengthens the applicability of these results for policy-making and environmental management.
For HCHO, the RMSE is 0.000096, which is also very low, showing excellent agreement between satellite and ground observations. Formaldehyde is a secondary pollutant produced by biomass burning and industrial processes. The low RMSE value indicates that satellite-based HCHO data can be used effectively alongside ground measurements for accurate air quality assessments, particularly in regions affected by industrial emissions.
SO2 has an RMSE of 0.000491, which is also considered low. This demonstrates strong consistency between satellite and ground station measurements. Since SO2 is predominantly emitted from thermal power plants and specific industrial processes, its low error level is particularly valuable for modeling and monitoring air pollution in industrial areas and evaluating the effectiveness of emission control policies.
For CO2, the RMSE is 0.028765, a low error level. This suggests that satellite and ground data are generally consistent, although some differences may occur in areas with localized emission sources, such as urban traffic hotspots. While CO satellite data are relatively reliable, caution is warranted when analyzing highly localized emission patterns.
O3 shows an RMSE of 0.143497, which represents a low error level. Ozone is a secondary pollutant formed through complex photochemical reactions strongly influenced by meteorological conditions. These factors contribute to discrepancies between satellite observations and ground measurements. Therefore, O3 satellite data should not be used in isolation and must be supplemented with ground-based measurements for accurate interpretation.
Lastly, the AI has a relatively high RMSE of 0.680122, indicating substantial discrepancies between satellite and ground data. Aerosol concentrations fluctuate rapidly and depend highly on local sources and atmospheric conditions. This mismatch becomes even more pronounced in urban environments with complex emission sources. Consequently, AI data should always be interpreted cautiously and validated with local ground measurements.

3. Results

This study investigated the impacts of LULC changes on six key air pollutants in Türkiye during 2019–2024 using TROPOMI/Sentinel-5P data. Landsat and MODIS datasets were integrated to produce detailed LULC maps. This approach revealed the relationships between LULC and air pollutants across Türkiye. The findings indicate that the spatial-temporal distribution of each pollutant is directly related to its LULC composition and change.

3.1. Detected Values for the Air Pollutants

AI values remained high throughout the year, particularly in agricultural areas of Central Anatolia (Konya, Kayseri, Sivas, Turkey) and in the industrially dense provinces of the Marmara Region (Figure 4). In spring and summer, values increased sharply due to dust transport from Syria and Iraq [42]. In inland areas with low wind speeds, aerosols remained suspended in the air for extended periods, negatively impacting visibility and transportation safety.
CO2 levels peaked during winter due to increased heating fuel use and energy production (Figure 5). Compared to other provinces in Türkiye, heavy traffic and construction pressures have led to high CO2 concentrations year-round in metropolitan areas such as Istanbul, Ankara, and Bursa. While relative decreases were observed in the summer, CO2 remained high in regions with ongoing industrial production.
Formaldehyde (HCHO) levels peak during the spring-summer period in industrial zones (Kocaeli, Izmir) and areas of intensive agricultural activity (Figure 6). This increase is associated with biomass combustion and agricultural waste incineration. The toxic and carcinogenic effects of HCHO [43] increase the risk to public health in these regions.
NO2 levels remained high in metropolitan centers yearly (Figure 7). During the winter months, fossil fuel use for heating and inversion conditions increased NO2 accumulation, while traffic congestion and industrial activity continued to have an impact during the summer months. The spatial distribution of NO2 is highly consistent with maps of urban expansion areas.
Ozone (O3) levels have increased along the Aegean and Mediterranean coasts, particularly during summer, due to photochemical reactions (Figure 8). There is a strong correlation between periods of high land surface temperatures and O3 increases. This critical factor can lead to photosynthesis loss and yield reductions in crops [44].
In regions with a high concentration of thermal power plants, such as Zonguldak, Manisa, and Sivas, SO2 values remained higher throughout the year than in other provinces in Türkiye (Figure 9). Peak values were recorded in winter due to increased heating and energy demand. The spatial distribution of SO2 overlaps with the LULC classes, where thermal power plants and heavy industry investments are concentrated.
Multi-figures showing the temporal changes in pollutants in Figure 10, Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13, Figure 14 and Figure 15 show significant increasing trends in NO2 and SO2 in the winter months and AI, HCHO, and O3 in the spring-summer periods between 2019 and 2024. CO2, on the other hand, exhibited a continuous increasing trend, except for the decrease during the pandemic period (2020).

3.2. Change Detection for Pollutants (SO2, O3, AI, CO2, NO2, HCHO)

This section examines changes in SO2, O3, AI, CO2, NO2, HCHO. Red-colored areas on the change detection maps indicate areas where pollutant values have increased. The January map of the AI change detection shows a red-intensive effect in the southern and western parts of Türkiye. This indicates that AI values increased, particularly in western and southern Türkiye in January. In March, western Türkiye is shown in darker red. This indicates a significant increase in AI values in western Türkiye between March 2019 and 2024. In December, AI values increased in the Central Anatolian Region of Türkiye (Figure 10).
The map below illustrates the fluctuations in Türkiye’s CO2 values between 2019 and 2024. Certain regions of Türkiye are worthy of particular attention on this map. In January, there was an increase in CO2 levels in the Eastern Mediterranean Region and the vicinity of Bursa city. As demonstrated in Figure 11, there has been an increase in CO2 levels in the northern part of Türkiye and the central and eastern parts of the Black Sea region in July.
The regions within Türkiye that demonstrated the most substantial alterations in HCHO values were located in the country’s northernmost reaches. The HCHO values exhibited a more substantial increase in the Black Sea region of Türkiye, particularly during August and September, compared to other areas. As illustrated in Figure 12, the highest increases in HCHO values were observed in June in the southern regions of Türkiye, particularly along the Mediterranean coast.
Changes in NO2 levels are observed in different regions of Türkiye monthly. For instance, the most significant changes in January were observed near Gaziantep in the southeast and around Izmir on the Aegean coast. As illustrated in Figure 13, the most significant variations in NO2 levels are observed near the Gaziantep-Osmaniye line and the Ankara-Eskişehir line during February. As demonstrated in Figure 13, the most significant changes in NO2 levels are evident in Istanbul and its surrounding areas in March. In April, Gaziantep and its surrounding areas are prominent in southeastern Türkiye. NO2 alterations are substantial between August and October in Istanbul and its surrounding areas.
O3 levels exhibit regional variation rather than being consistent at the microscale. As demonstrated in Figure 14, there is an increase in O3 levels in southeastern Türkiye and the eastern Mediterranean region in January. Observations have also been made in the Southeastern Anatolia Region, with changes noted in February. Furthermore, a notable increase in O3 levels was evident in the northern sector’s central region of the Black Sea in February. There was a significant increase in O3 levels in northwestern Türkiye during March. There is a significant increase in O3 levels across almost all of Türkiye in April. In June, there was an increase in O3 values in eastern Türkiye.
In April, SO2 changes are particularly evident. During this period, SO2 increases are observed in all regions except some parts of eastern Türkiye. As illustrated in Figure 15, the highest increases in SO2 levels were observed in the eastern region of Türkiye during August.

3.3. Relation Between Land Use and Air Quality

The LULC maps (different resolution datasets) shown in Figure 16 and Figure 17 show the expansion of urban areas, particularly along the Marmara, Aegean, and Mediterranean coasts, while agricultural lands intensify in Central Anatolia. These changes are consistent with the spatial distribution patterns of pollutants.
The findings reported in articles investigating land cover changes in Türkiye are as follows [45,46,47,48,49,50]:
Rapid urban growth across Türkiye is shrinking agricultural land, particularly in the Marmara, Aegean, and Mediterranean regions. While forest areas have increased significantly since the 2000s, some regions are experiencing significant losses due to fires and mining activities. Satellite data can be used to determine crop patterns and estimate yields in agricultural production areas, playing a critical role in food security planning. Drought, land degradation, and depletion of water resources, especially in Southeastern and Central Anatolia, can be identified using satellite-based indicators. The impacts of land use changes on ecosystem services, carbon balance, and biodiversity can be reflected in models.
In urbanized and industrialized areas with low NDVI values, higher NO2, SO2, and HCHO levels are observed compared to other provinces (Figure 17). Forest and grassland areas with high NDVI values generally showed lower pollutant concentrations, demonstrating the role of green cover in improving air quality [51].
High LST values were recorded in areas where the urban heat island effect was particularly intense during summer (Figure 18). These areas are also the provinces with the highest O3 and NO2 levels in Türkiye.
The spatial distribution of AI, CO2, HCHO, NO2, O3, and SO2 by province shows that pollution centers in Türkiye are concentrated in the Marmara and Aegean coasts, Central Anatolian agricultural basins, and thermal power plant regions. These patterns reveal the determinant role of LULC composition and land management policies on air quality.
The Aerosol Index was particularly high in inland regions (e.g., Konya, Kayseri, Sivas) and some Marmara provinces with high industrial density. This indicates that dust, smoke, and similar particulate matter remain suspended in the air for extended periods. Regions with a continental climate may hinder the dispersion of aerosols due to weaker winds.
AI in Türkiye generally increases during dust transport events originating from Syria and Iraq [42]. Aerosols can reflect or absorb sunlight, reducing the amount of solar energy reaching the ground. Furthermore, aerosols, especially PM2.5 (under 2.5 microns), can penetrate the lungs and trigger asthma, bronchitis, COPD, and pneumonia [52]. In places with high AI values, visibility decreases due to air pollution. Land, sea, and air transportation can be negatively affected.
CO2 levels are generally higher in cities with high population density and traffic congestion. Significant CO2 levels have been observed in major cities such as Istanbul, Ankara, and Bursa. Heat emissions can also cause this gas to increase during winter. This gas is lower in some Eastern Anatolia and the Black Sea region rural provinces.
Increased CO2 can cause local and global problems. As CO2 levels increase, heat is trapped in the atmosphere, increasing the earth’s average temperature [53,54]. Some global problems caused by increased CO2 in the atmosphere include glacier melting, rising sea levels, and increased frequency of extreme weather events.
CO2 also harms human health [55]. CO2 is not toxic, but high CO2 levels in indoor environments cause serious health problems. In metropolitan cities, CO2 emissions from energy production, transportation, and construction are particularly high [56].
HCHO is a reactive gas in the atmosphere formed by natural and anthropogenic processes. HCHO levels are primarily due to industrial activities, biomass combustion, and some agricultural practices [57]. Data show this gas is also high in industrial and densely populated areas, while levels are lower in rural and non-agricultural areas. Western provinces (such as İzmir and Kocaeli) and some central Anatolian cities are particularly notable for this gas.
Anthropogenic sources that increase HCHO levels in cities include motor vehicle exhaust (especially diesel), industrial facilities, and burning wood and coal [58]. Furthermore, formaldehyde is a primarily toxic gas and is classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a Group 1 carcinogen (substances known to cause cancer in humans) [43].
NO2 is a reactive gas typically produced by the combustion of fossil fuels (gasoline, diesel, coal, natural gas). It is one of the primary pollutants of urban air and is primarily released into the atmosphere from sources such as vehicle exhaust, industrial chimneys, and power plants [59]. The highest NO2 values are observed in metropolitan areas (especially in industrialized provinces with high traffic density, such as Istanbul, Ankara, and Izmir). Provinces in the Thrace and Marmara Regions (e.g., Tekirdağ, Kocaeli) also have high values. These regions have industry and intensive road transportation. Provinces in Eastern and Southeastern Anatolia (e.g., Hakkari, Bitlis) generally have lower average NO2 values, indicating relatively low industrial and traffic density.
There are two types of ozone. O3 concentrations in the stratosphere are called “good ozone” [60]. Good ozone gases in the stratosphere protect living things by absorbing harmful UV rays from the sun. O3 concentrations formed in the troposphere, near the surface, are called “bad ozone” [60]. This ozone is an air pollutant and is harmful to human health. High surface ozone damages plant tissues: It reduces photosynthesis, causes effects such as leaf spotting, yellowing, and premature aging, and leads to yield reductions, particularly in crops such as wheat, corn, and potatoes [44].
Ozone gas generally accumulates on the surface during sunny, hot, and stable weather conditions. Therefore, provinces in the Aegean and Mediterranean regions (e.g., Aydın, Muğla, Antalya) may have higher values. Moderate O3 concentrations have also been observed in Central Anatolia. Photochemical reactions may increase in these regions due to the high temperature and sunshine duration.
SO2 is most commonly produced by the combustion of fossil fuels (especially coal and diesel). Thermal power plants, stoves, heating systems, diesel-powered vehicles, volcanic activity, and industrial facilities are significant sources of SO2 [61,62].
Provinces with a high concentration of industrial zones and thermal power plants are noteworthy in the SO2 distribution. For example, provinces such as Zonguldak, Manisa, and Sivas may have high values. Sulfur dioxide is primarily emitted from fossil fuel use and industrial chimneys. Therefore, provinces with industrial investments and coal-fired power plants are at the forefront.
A holistic analysis of the findings indicates that air pollution in Türkiye varies seasonally, spatially, and sectorally, with urban expansion, industrial production, and agricultural activities having the dominant impacts on pollution. Between 2019 and 2024, the decrease in green spaces and the increase in artificial surfaces led to persistent increases in NO2, SO2, HCHO, and AI values. These results highlight the urgent need for integrated air quality management, green infrastructure strengthening, and emission control policies.

4. Discussion

This study, conducted using satellite data, assessed the impacts of land use/land cover changes on air quality in Türkiye and revealed how urban expansion, industrial activities, and deforestation shape pollutant concentrations. Our findings are consistent with international literature but offer new perspectives reflecting region-specific dynamics. As in the study conducted by Fang et al. [21] in China, strong correlations were found between urbanization and increases in NO2 levels, particularly evident in metropolitan areas. However, in contrast to their focus on industrial emissions, our study revealed the significant role of agricultural practices in aerosol pollution in Anatolia, a finding more similar to Gao et al.’s [23] findings in agricultural regions of India.
The photochemical ozone formation observed in the Mediterranean region in our study mirrors that documented in Southern Europe. However, it has a higher seasonal amplitude due to Türkiye’s unique topographic and climatic conditions. In contrast to the constant rural-urban pollution gradients identified in European studies, our study revealed sharp transitions at topographic boundaries, particularly between coastal and inland areas.
Compared to Zou et al.’s [63] study on urban sprawl, our study revealed more complex relationships between urban heat islands and pollutant distribution in Turkish cities due to the interaction of sea breezes and topographic influences. Furthermore, while Superczynski and Christopher [24] attributed pollution patterns primarily to transportation in their Alabama study, our multivariate analysis revealed equal contributions from industrial areas, transportation networks, and residential heating in Türkiye.
The vegetation-air quality relationship examined in our study demonstrates similarities and differences with findings from other regions. Guo et al. [23] reported strong negative correlations between green spaces and PM2.5 in Tianjin, while our study found stronger associations with gaseous pollutants (NO2, SO2, O3) in Turkish cities, demonstrating that the role of vegetation extends beyond particle retention to include gas-phase interactions.
This research contributes to the field’s knowledge by integrating multiple satellite datasets to create a comprehensive pollution-LULC interaction model specific to the Eastern Mediterranean region. Our temporal analysis (2018–2024), which includes post-pandemic recovery models, illuminates a topic not addressed in previous studies by revealing how economic recovery accelerates pollution trends in industrial corridors. Our findings provide valuable comparisons to similar developing economies experiencing rapid urbanization while maintaining important agricultural sectors. Vadrevu et al. [26] emphasized in the synthesis study in Asia that the need for regional-scale policy development remains valid in Turkey, and this study provides a data-based contribution to this need.
Urban expansion and industrial activities caused a significant increase in NO2 and CO2 emissions. These findings align with similar observations in metropolitan and heavily industrialized regions following the COVID-19 lockdown period, where renewed human activities resulted in elevated levels of NO2, CO, SO2, and aerosol optical depth, as documented in a recent spatiotemporal analysis of air pollutants in the Dhaka Division by Hossin et al. [64]. Matci et al. [65] documented the decrease in NO2 levels in Türkiye during the COVID-19 restrictions period using Sentinel-5P data, demonstrating the direct impact of urban activities on air quality. Similarly, this study found that traffic and industrial density increased NO2 and CO2 emissions in metropolitan areas such as Istanbul, Ankara, and Izmir. Yagmur Aydin and Aydin [66] estimated ground-level NO2 concentrations in Istanbul using machine learning models, emphasizing the importance of integrating satellite data with ground-based measurements. This finding supports the validity of the TROPOMI data used in this study.
The impact of forest fires on air quality was demonstrated by Yilmaz et al. [32] and Çinar et al. [67] through increased CO2 and aerosol levels in the Manavgat and Marmaris fires. As investigated earlier by Baltaci & Ezber [42], in this study, the elevated AI (Aerosol Index) in inland regions was linked to dust transport from Syria and Iraq and local agricultural activities. A study by Serifoglu Yilmaz [68] documented increases in NO2 and CO2 after the fires, up to 260%, which supports this study’s regional AI findings.
Regarding industrial pollution, Uyar and Akcin [69] analyzed methane emissions from coal mines in Zonguldak. In this study, SO2 was detected at high concentrations in regions with a high concentration of thermal power plants (Manisa, Zonguldak), demonstrating the decisive role of industrial activities on regional air quality. Yücer et al. [70] demonstrated the impact of industrial density on PM10 and SO2 distribution in their study in İzmit, which is consistent with this study’s findings in industrial zones.
The relationship between urban heat island (UHI) and air pollution was investigated by Wang et al. [71] and Fuladlu and Altan [72], finding significant correlations between surface temperature and NO2 and O3. This study also observed that photochemical reactions increase surface ozone in the Mediterranean and Aegean regions. Furthermore, Bhandari and Zhang [51] emphasized the role of green infrastructure in reducing UHI and air pollution, and this finding was supported by the negative correlation between NDVI and pollutants in this study.
Regarding the impact of agricultural activities, Çınar et al. [73] documented how stubble burning increases SO2 levels in Mardin-Diyarbakır. This study confirms the impact of agricultural activities on regional air quality by detecting high AI values in agricultural areas in central Anatolia. A study by Yasan et al. [74] in Istanbul revealed that urban sprawl increased by 14% between 1996 and 2021, significantly impacting air quality.
These findings support the consistency of the TROPOMI data used in this study. Furthermore, a study conducted by Nabizada et al. [75] in Afghanistan emphasized the importance of spatial and temporal analysis of NO2 distribution, consistent with this study’s findings regarding regional differences. The effectiveness of satellite-based monitoring systems (Sentinel-5P, MODIS), in particular, in air quality management has been confirmed by many studies in the literature, including Li et al. [76], Jodhani et al. [77], and Yilgan et al. [78]. These findings further emphasize the importance of data-driven decision support systems for sustainable urban planning and environmental policies. As Mustafa et al. [79] and Saha et al. [80] emphasize, integrated air quality management systems and green infrastructure planning should form the basis of future pollution control strategies.
Using satellite-based data, this study fills a significant gap by revealing the complex relationship between land use/cover changes and air quality in Türkiye. The findings suggest that maintaining and increasing green infrastructure, particularly in urban and industrial areas, can improve air quality and mitigate climate change. Future studies are recommended to develop more detailed local-scale monitoring systems and holistic models incorporating socioeconomic factors. Such studies will guide policymakers in achieving sustainable development goals.
The seasonal findings of this study highlight the need to develop seasonally focused policy strategies for air pollution management in Türkiye. The significant increase in NO2 and SO2 concentrations during the winter months stems from fossil fuel-based heating and energy production and was observed more prominently in regions with a high concentration of thermal power plants and in metropolitan areas. Increases in O3, AI, and HCHO concentrations during the spring and summer months were associated with photochemical reactions, agricultural activities, stubble burning, and industrial emissions. In light of these findings, it is recommended to restrict coal use for heating during the winter, mandate flash gas desulfurization systems in thermal power plants, and install continuous emission monitoring systems in industrial facilities. For the summer months, it is critical to implement measures such as effectively banning stubble burning, imposing seasonal restrictions on industrial facilities with high VOC emissions, and restricting vehicle use in metropolitan areas.
According to a systematic review by Knight et al. [81], the effectiveness of urban greening projects has shown limited effectiveness in reducing surface ozone concentrations, while dense vegetation, in particular, has been reported to reduce ultraviolet radiation exposure by 15–25% and reduce the urban heat island effect by 1–2 °C. Regarding NO2 pollution, Chauhan et al. [82] used machine learning models to predict that a 10% increase in green infrastructure could contribute to a 3–5% reduction in traffic-related NO2 emissions. These findings suggest that plant species selection and layout strategies should be optimized for specific pollutant types when planning green infrastructure investments.

4.1. Limitations

While the findings of this comprehensive study, which evaluates the relationship between land use/changes and air quality at a national scale in Türkiye, yield significant results, the study has some limitations. Addressing these limitations in future research will contribute to a more in-depth understanding of the subject.
There is a trade-off between the spatial and temporal resolutions of the satellite data used in the study. While TROPOMI data provides daily temporal resolution, its spatial resolution of approximately 1.1 km masks hyper-local pollution gradients and small-scale land use characteristics that significantly impact air quality. In contrast, satellites with higher spatial resolution, such as Landsat, have lower temporal resolution.
Meteorological conditions such as cloud cover and atmospheric humidity can affect the quality and continuity of satellite data, leading to data loss or increased uncertainty. This can create gaps in daily datasets, especially during winter months and in coastal areas.
While the study focuses on six major air pollutants, it does not include other pollutants critical to public health and climate change, such as particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10) and methane (CH4). Therefore, the relationship of these pollutants to land use changes has not been fully assessed.
While land use/land cover classifications have been validated with the CORINE dataset, they may not fully reflect local-scale dynamics and nuanced land use details. For example, the classification process may overlook heterogeneous structures within a pixel or differences in agricultural practices.
Finally, the lack of socioeconomic variables such as population growth, energy consumption patterns, and industrial production data in the models prevented the analysis of the indirect effects of the socioeconomic drivers underlying pollution changes.

4.2. Recommendations for Future Studies

Future studies should adopt a multi-scale and interdisciplinary approach to overcome these limitations. Integrating data from unmanned aerial vehicles and ground sensor networks with satellite data is crucial to capturing hyper-local relationships. Machine learning and AI-powered fusion algorithms can enable the creation of continuous, high-resolution datasets by combining datasets with different spatial and temporal resolutions.
Studying pollutants such as PM2.5 and PM10 is critical for identifying public health risks and must be included in future studies. Furthermore, modeling the impacts of agricultural activities, stubble burning practices, and climate change on air quality will enable integrated consideration of rural and urban management strategies.
Integrating socioeconomic data into the model is essential for understanding the anthropogenic factors behind changes in pollution. Ultimately, an integrated monitoring and analysis framework that combines satellite data, ground measurements, socioeconomic indicators, and advanced modeling techniques will provide a more robust data-driven decision support system for sustainable urban planning and environmental policies.

5. Conclusions

This study comprehensively demonstrated the spatial and temporal impacts of LULC changes on air quality in Türkiye during 2019–2024, using high-resolution satellite data and spatial statistical methods. The findings demonstrate that urban expansion, industrial concentration, agricultural activities, and deforestation significantly impact different pollutants. Specifically, it was revealed that NO2 and CO2 emissions are primarily driven by traffic and energy consumption in metropolitan areas. The increase in AI values is directly related to dust transport and agricultural practices in Central and Southeastern Anatolia. O3 levels increase through photochemical reactions due to high temperatures and duration of sunshine along the Mediterranean and Aegean coasts. These patterns were evaluated holistically, not only based on individual pollutants but also using LULC composition, NDVI, and LST data.
One of the study’s most important findings is the quantitative confirmation of green spaces’ air quality regulatory function. The significantly lower pollutant concentrations in areas with forests and meadows with high NDVI values demonstrate that green infrastructure provides a critical ecosystem service at both urban and rural scales. Conversely, the increase in the proportion of artificial surfaces and industrial areas has exacerbated the deterioration trend in air quality indicators. This suggests urban planning policies should focus on spatial growth and maintaining ecological balance.
The study also sheds light on the seasonal patterns of pollutants. Combustion pollutants such as NO2 and SO2 peak in winter, while AI, HCHO, and O3 peak in spring-summer. This finding highlights the importance of implementing seasonally focused measures in air pollution management. For example, promoting emission-reducing technologies for heating fossil fuel use in the winter months and prioritizing traffic management and shading/greening projects to reduce photochemical ozone formation in the summer months would be effective.
The findings from this study indicate that the policy set to reduce air pollution in Türkiye should be shaped along three principal axes:
Green infrastructure and ecosystem protection: Protecting and increasing forests, meadows, and other green areas strategically reduces the urban heat island effect and pollutant accumulation.
Industrial and urban emission management: Advanced filtration technologies and renewable energy sources should be encouraged to control emissions from thermal power plants, heavy industrial facilities, and traffic.
Seasonally focused intervention programs: Preventive and mitigating action plans should be developed to address NO2 and SO2 concentrations in winter, and O3 and AI concentrations in summer.
In conclusion, this research has revealed the multidimensional impacts of LULC changes on air quality in Türkiye at high spatial and temporal resolution, offering important implications for both science and practice. The study powerfully demonstrates that the success of sustainable urbanization, industrial planning, and land management policies depends on holistic and continuous monitoring of environmental data. The results provide a comprehensive understanding of the current situation and a foundation for guiding future environmental planning and national air quality management strategies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A.Ç. and D.O.G.; methodology, M.A.Ç. and D.O.G.; software, M.A.Ç.; validation, M.A.Ç. and A.B.; formal analysis, M.A.Ç. and A.B.; investigation, M.A.Ç.; resources, M.A.Ç. and A.B.; data curation, M.A.Ç.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A.Ç., A.B. and M.E.A.; writing—review and editing, M.A.Ç., M.E.A. and D.O.G.; visualization, M.A.Ç.; supervision, D.O.G.; project administration, M.A.Ç. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Sentinel-5P TROPOMI data are publicly available through the Copernicus Open Access Hub https://scihub.copernicus.eu/ (accessed on 15 April 2025). MODIS data were accessed via Google Earth Engine (GEE).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Igdir University and Jimma University College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine for providing technical infrastructure support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Allan, R.P.; Arias, P.A.; Berger, S.; Canadell, J.G.; Cassou, C.; Chen, D.; Cherchi, A.; Connors, S.L.; Coppola, E.; Cruz, F.A.; et al. Intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC). Summary for policymakers. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2023; pp. 3–32. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kan, H. World Health Organization air quality guidelines 2021: Implication for air pollution control and climate goal in China. Chin. Med. J. 2022, 135, 513–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kaur, H. Air pollution and greenhouse gases emissions: Implications in food production and food security. In Greenhouse Gases: Sources, Sinks and Mitigation; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 107–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Akyıldız, G.K.; Altındağ, A.; Tavşanoğlu, Ü.N. Recent advances in freshwater zooplankton in a conservation hotspot: Türkiye case. Hydrobiologia 2025, 852, 2581–2594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yulu, A. Esenler’de şehirsel yenileme. Geogr. J. 2017, 35, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Çelik, M.A.; Gülersoy, A.E. Işıklı Gölü (Çivril-Denizli) çevresindeki arazi kullanım faaliyetlerinin göl üzerine etkilerinin incelenmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniv. Fen-Ed. Fak. Sos. Bil. Derg. 2013, 29, 191–200. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gülersoy, A.E.; Çelik, M.A.; Sönmez, M.E. Tarsus Şehrinin Alansal Gelişimine (1985–2011) Ekolojik Bakiş. Electron. Turk. Stud. 2014, 9, 741–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ustaoglu, E.; Williams, B. Institutional settings and effects on agricultural land conversion: A global and spatial analysis of European regions. Land 2022, 12, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Goetz, A.R. Transport challenges in rapidly growing cities: Is there a magic bullet? Transp. Rev. 2019, 39, 701–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Reckien, D.; Martinez-Fernandez, C. Why do cities shrink? Eur. Plan. Stud. 2011, 19, 1375–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Biedemariam, M.; Birhane, E.; Demissie, B.; Tadesse, T.; Gebresamuel, G.; Habtu, S. Ecosystem service values as related to land use and land cover changes in Ethiopia: A review. Land 2022, 11, 2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kumar, P.; Morawska, L.; Martani, C.; Biskos, G.; Neophytou, M.; Di Sabatino, S.; Bell, M.; Norford, L.; Britter, R. The rise of low-cost sensing for managing air pollution in cities. Environ. Int. 2015, 75, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Wu, M. Mitigating construction dust pollution: State of the art and the way forward. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 1658–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wieser, A.A.; Scherz, M.; Passer, A.; Kreiner, H. Challenges of a healthy built environment: Air pollution in construction industry. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yılmaz, O. Türkiye’de kentsel dönüşümün uygulayıcı aktörleri ve yaptıkları çalışmaların sayısal verileri. Marmara Turk. Arast. Derg. 2019, 6, 300–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Atmiş, E.; Özden, S.; Lise, W. Urbanization pressures on the natural forests in Turkey: An overview. Urban For. Urban Green. 2007, 6, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Çadırcı, Ç.; Kaya, L. The Effect of Urbanization on Tax Revenues in Türkiye: A Review for the Period 1972–2021. Cumhuriyet Univ. J. Econ. Adm. Sci. 2023, 24, 595–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yılmaz, E.S.; Yılmaz, S. A review on Urbanization, Pollution and Biodiversity in İzmir. Int. J. Environ. Trends 2019, 3, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ozturk, M.; Celik, A.; Yarci, C.; Aksoy, A.; Feoli, E. An overview of plant diversity, land use and degradation in the Mediterranean region of Turkey. Environ. Manag. Health 2002, 13, 442–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yalım, F.; Karavar, M. Agricultural Communication Within the Framework of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: A Review of the Youtube Accounts of the Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry and the Republic of Turkey Ministry of Environment, Urbanization and Climate Change. Trakya Univ. J. Soc. Sci. 2025, 27, 253–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fang, C.; Liu, H.; Li, G.; Sun, D.; Miao, Z. Estimating the impact of urbanization on air quality in China using spatial regression models. Sustainability 2015, 7, 15570–15592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fu, Y.; Tai, A. Impact of climate and land cover changes on tropospheric ozone air quality and public health in East Asia between 1980 and 2010. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2015, 15, 10093–10106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gao, W.W.; Bai, L.Y.; Feng, J.Z.; Cao, D.; Cui, M.R.; Li, Z.W.; Duan, C.Y. Exploring land cover effects on urban air quality: A case of 659 districts in India. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2019, 42, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Superczynski, S.; Christopher, S. Exploring land use and land cover effects on air quality in central Alabama using GIS and remote sensing. Remote Sens. 2011, 3, 2552–2567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Sailor, D.; Ban-Weiss, G. Effects of urbanization on regional meteorology and air quality in southern California. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2019, 19, 4439–4457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vadrevu, K.; Ohara, T.; Justice, C. Land cover, land use changes and air pollution in Asia: A synthesis. Environ. Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 120201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhu, Z.; Wang, G.; Dong, J. Correlation analysis between land use/cover change and air pollutants—A case study in Wuyishan City. Energies 2019, 12, 2545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ayoobi, A.W.; Ahmadi, H.; Inceoglu, M.; Pekkan, E. Seasonal impacts of buildings’ energy consumption on the variation and spatial distribution of air pollutant over Kabul City: Application of Sentinel-5P TROPOMI products. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 2022, 15, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cakmak, N.; Yilmaz, O.S.; Balik Sanli, F. Spatio-temporal Analysis of Pollutant Gases using Sentinel-5P TROPOMI Data on the Google Earth Engine during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Marmara Region, Türkiye. e-Zbornik 2023, 13, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hilker, T.; Lyapustin, A.I.; Tucker, C.J.; Sellers, P.J.; Hall, F.G.; Wang, Y. Remote sensing of tropical ecosystems: Atmospheric correction and cloud masking matter. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 127, 370–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sun, X.; Li, X.; Tan, B.; Gao, J.; Wang, L.; Xiong, S. Integrating Otsu Thresholding and Random Forest for Land Use/Land Cover (LULC) Classification and Seasonal Analysis of Water and Snow/Ice. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yilmaz, O.S.; Acar, U.; Sanli, F.B.; Gulgen, F.; Ates, A.M. Mapping burn severity and monitoring CO content in Türkiye’s 2021 Wildfires, using Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-5P satellite data on the GEE platform. Earth Sci. Inform. 2023, 16, 221–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wardlow, B.D.; Egbert, S.L. Large-area crop mapping using time-series MODIS 250 m NDVI data: An assessment for the US Central Great Plains. Remote Sens. Environ. 2008, 112, 1096–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hu, J.; Zhang, Y. Seasonal change of land-use/land-cover (LULC) detection using MODIS data in rapid urbanization regions: A case study of the Pearl River Delta region (China). IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2013, 6, 1913–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Singh, R.K.; Singh, P.; Drews, M.; Kumar, P.; Singh, H.; Gupta, A.K.; Govil, H.; Kaur, A.; Kumar, M. A machine learning-based classification of LANDSAT images to map land use and land cover of India. Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ. 2021, 24, 100624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mirmazloumi, S.M.; Kakooei, M.; Mohseni, F.; Ghorbanian, A.; Amani, M.; Crosetto, M.; Monserrat, O. ELULC-10, a 10 m European land use and land cover map using Sentinel and Landsat data in Google Earth Engine. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 3041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tanoori, G.; Soltani, A.; Modiri, A. Machine learning for urban heat island (UHI) analysis: Predicting land surface temperature (LST) in urban environments. Urban Clim. 2024, 55, 101962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hussain, S.; Mubeen, M.; Nasim, W.; Karuppannan, S.; Ahmad, A.; Amjad, M.; Fahad, S.; Tariq, A.; Akram, W. Assessing the impact of land use land cover changes on soil moisture and vegetation cover in Southern Punjab, Pakistan using multi-temporal satellite data. Geol. Ecol. Landsc. 2024, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Naikoo, M.W.; Rihan, M.; Shahfahad Peer, A.H.; Talukdar, S.; Mallick, J.; Ishtiaq, M.; Rahman, A. Analysis of peri-urban land use/land cover change and its drivers using geospatial techniques and geographically weighted regression. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 116421–116439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mishra, M.K.; Mathew, A. Investigating the spatio-temporal correlation between urban heat island and atmospheric pollution island interaction over Delhi, India using geospatial techniques. Arab. J. Geosci. 2022, 15, 1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kadaverugu, R.; Nandeshwar, S.; Biniwale, R. Wavelet local multiple correlation analysis of long-term AOD, LST, and NDVI time-series over different climatic zones of India. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2024, 155, 9231–9246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Baltaci, H.; Ezber, Y. Characterization of atmospheric mechanisms that cause the transport of Arabian dust particles to the southeastern region of Turkey. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 22771–22784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Enuneku, A.; Aigbogho, U.G.; Amaechi, C.F.; Ehinlaiye, O.A. Monitoring the trends of carbon monoxide and tropospheric formaldehyde in Edo State using Sentinel-5P and Google Earth Engine from 2018 to 2023. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2025, 197, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Nowroz, F.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Siddika, A.; Parvin, K.; Caparros, P.G.; Nahar, K.; Prasad, P.V. Elevated tropospheric ozone and crop production: Potential negative effects and plant defense mechanisms. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 14, 1244515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tanrivermis, H. Agricultural land use change and sustainable use of land resources in the Mediterranean region of Turkey. J. Arid Environ. 2003, 54, 553–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yücer, A.A. The land use in Turkey: A general assessment and affecting factors. J. Geosci. 2020, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Çakir, G.; Ün, C.; Baskent, E.Z.; Köse, S.; Sivrikaya, F.; Keleş, S. Evaluating urbanization, fragmentation and land use/land cover change pattern in Istanbul city, Turkey from 1971 to 2002. Land Degrad. Dev. 2008, 19, 663–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Çelik, M.A. Islâhiye Ilçesi Arazi Kullanimi Üzerinde Yükselti, Eğim Ve Toprak Faktörlerinin Etkisi. J. Soc. Sci. 2012, 2. [Google Scholar]
  49. Ikiel, C.; Dutucu, A.A.; Ustaoglu, B.; Kilic, D.E. Land use and land cover (LULC) classification using Spot-5 image in the Adapazari Plain and its surroundings, Turkey. Tojsat 2012, 2, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Çelik, M.; Kızılelma, Y.; Gülersoy, A.; Denizdurduran, M. Investigation of the Emerging Change in Wetlands in South of Lower Seyhan Plain by Using Different Remote Sensing Technics (1990–2010). Turk. Stud. 2013, 8, 263–284. [Google Scholar]
  51. Bhandari, S.; Zhang, C. Urban green space prioritization to mitigate air pollution and the urban heat island effect in Kathmandu Metropolitan City, Nepal. Land 2022, 11, 2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sharma, R.; Kurmi, O.P.; Hariprasad, P.; Tyagi, S.K. Health implications due to exposure to fine and ultra-fine particulate matters: A short review. Int. J. Ambient Energy 2024, 45, 2314256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wigley, T.M.; Schlesinger, M.E. Analytical solution for the effect of increasing CO2 on global mean temperature. Nature 1985, 315, 649–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yurak, V.V.; Fedorov, S.A. Review of natural and anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide into the earth’s atmosphere. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2025, 22, 2719–2736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Guo, A.; Ullah, O.; Zeb, A.; Din, N.U.; Hussain, S. Unveiling health dynamics: Exploring the impact of CO2 emissions, urbanization, and renewable energy on life expectancy and infant mortality in SAARC countries (1990–2022). Nat. Resour. Forum 2025, 49, 1795–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tian, Y.; Zuo, S.; Ju, J.; Dai, S.; Ren, Y.; Dou, P. Local carbon emission zone construction in the highly urbanized regions: Application of residential and transport CO2 emissions in Shanghai, China. Build. Environ. 2024, 247, 111007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gupta, P.; Shukla, A.K.; Shukla, D.P. ML-based hybrid SAR and optical image LULC mapping and change analysis with variations in the air quality of the Imphal Valley, North-East India. Earth Space Sci. 2024, 11, e2023EA003176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Mariam, A.; Ishfaq, U.B.E.; Rana, A.D.; Batool, S.A.; Parvez, S.; Iqbal, M. Spatiotemporal variations of tropospheric formaldehyde and its potential sources over Pakistan based on satellite remote sensing. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2025, 16, 102483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Han, S.; Huang, W.; Cui, S.; Gao, B.; Zhai, Y. Productive and Consumptive Emission Characteristics of Energy-related Nitrogen Oxides in Eastern Chinese Cities. Ecosyst. Health Sustain. 2024, 10, 0226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Alvim-Ferraz, M.C.; Sousa, S.I.; Martins, F.G.; Ferraz, M.P. Tropospheric and Stratospheric Ozone: Scientific History and Shifts in Early Perspectives Regarding the Impact on Human Health. Atmosphere 2024, 15, 1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Amritha, S.; Patel, V.K.; Kuttippurath, J. The COVID-19 lockdown induced changes of SO2 pollution in its Human-made global hotspots. Glob. Transit. 2024, 6, 152–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Huang, Y.; Ge, W.; He, J.; Guo, D.; Li, J.; Li, K. Low Carbon Multi Fuel Power Generation Technology for Coal-Fired Power Plants and Its Application in China. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Energy Engineering, Singapore, 7–9 November 2024; pp. 12–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zou, B.; Xu, S.; Sternberg, T.; Fang, X. Effect of land use and cover change on air quality in urban sprawl. Sustainability 2016, 8, 677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Hossin, M.A.; Haque, A.; Saha, O.R.; Islam, R.; Shimin, T.I. A spatiotemporal analysis of air pollutants during and after COVID-19: A case study of Dhaka Division using Google Earth Engine. DYSONA-Appl. Sci. 2025, 6, 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Matci, D.K.; Kaplan, G.; Avdan, U. Changes in air quality over different land covers associated with COVID-19 in Turkey aided by GEE. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2022, 194, 762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Yagmur Aydin, N.; Aydin, I. Estimation of Ground-Level NO2 Concentrations Over Megacities Using Sentinel-5P and Machine Learning Models: A Case Study of Istanbul. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2025, 48, 303–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Çinar, T.; Taşpinar, F.; Aydin, A. Analysis and estimation of gaseous air pollutant emissions emitted into the atmosphere during Manavgat and Milas wildfire episodes using remote sensing data and ground measurements. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 2024, 17, 559–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Serifoglu Yilmaz, C. Assessing Air Pollutant Emissions in the Aftermath of the 2021 Forest Fires in Marmaris and Manavgat, TÜRKİYE: Insights from Satellite-Based Monitoring. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2024, 48, 329–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Uyar, N.; Akcin, H. Investigation of Impact to Climate Change of Metan Emission of Underground Mines and Thermal Power Plants Using Sentinel-5p TROPOMI Satellite Data from GEE Platform. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2025, 48, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Yücer, E.; Erener, A.; Sarp, G. A land use regression model to estimate ambient concentrations of PM10 and SO2 in İzmit, Turkey. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 2023, 51, 1329–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wang, Y.; Guo, Z.; Han, J. The relationship between urban heat island and air pollutants and them with influencing factors in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 129, 107976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Fuladlu, K.; Altan, H. Examining land surface temperature and relations with the major air pollutants: A remote sensing research in case of Tehran. Urban Clim. 2021, 39, 100958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Çınar, T.; Cakır, M.F.; Aydın, A. Assessment of environmental and atmospheric impacts of stubble burning in Mardin-Diyarbakır (Southeastern of Türkiye): A remote sensing approach. Nat. Hazards 2025, 121, 17895–17912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Yasan, D.; Acar, U.; Yılmaz, O.S. Investigating the Relationship between Urbanization and Air Pollution Using Google Earth Engine Platform: A Case Study of Istanbul. Int. J. Environ. Geoinf. 2024, 11, 130–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Nabizada, M.J.; Rousta, I.; Elzein, A.; Olafsson, H. Evaluation of spatial distribution and temporal trend of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) pollution using Sentinel-5P satellite imagery over Afghanistan based on Google Earth Engine. Earth Sci. Inform. 2025, 18, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Li, X.; Messina, J.P.; Moore, N.J.; Fan, P.; Shortridge, A.M. MODIS land cover uncertainty in regional climate simulations. Clim. Dyn. 2017, 49, 4047–4059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Jodhani, K.H.; Gupta, N.; Parmar, A.D.; Bhavsar, J.D.; Patel, H.; Patel, D.; Singh, S.K.; Mishra, U.; jee Omar, P. Synergizing Google Earth Engine and earth observations for potential impact of land use/land cover on air quality. Results Eng. 2024, 22, 102039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Yilgan, F.; Miháliková, M.; Kara, R.S.; Ustuner, M. Analysis of the forest fire in the ‘Bohemian Switzerland’ National Park using Landsat-8 and Sentinel-5P in Google Earth Engine. Nat. Hazards 2025, 121, 6133–6154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Mustafa, A.R.A.; Shokr, M.S.; Alharbi, T.; Abdelsamie, E.A.; El-Sorogy, A.S.; Meroño de Larriva, J.E. Integration of Google Earth Engine and Aggregated Air Quality Index for Monitoring and Mapping the Spatio-Temporal Air Quality to Improve Environmental Sustainability in Arid Regions. Sustainability 2025, 17, 3450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Saha, M.; Al Kafy, A.; Bakshi, A.; Nath, H.; Alsulamy, S.; Rahaman, Z.A.; Saroar, M. The urban air quality nexus: Assessing the interplay of land cover change and air pollution in emerging South Asian cities. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 361, 124877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Knight, T.; Price, S.; Bowler, D.; Hookway, A.; King, S.; Konno, K.; Richter, R.L. How Effective Is ‘Greening’ of Urban Areas in Reducing Human Exposure to Ground-Level Ozone Concentrations, UV Exposure and the ‘Urban Heat Island Effect’? An Updated Systematic Review. Environ. Evid. 2021, 10, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Chauhan, B.V.; Berg, M.J.; Smallbone, K.L.; Rautela, I.; Ballal, S.; Wyche, K.P. Machine Learning Driven Prediction and Analysis of NO2 and Its Catalyst-Based Reduction in Urban Environments. Top. Catal. 2025, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A map showing the study area with the provinces of Türkiye.
Figure 1. A map showing the study area with the provinces of Türkiye.
Land 14 01945 g001
Figure 2. A methodological framework of the research.
Figure 2. A methodological framework of the research.
Land 14 01945 g002
Figure 3. Correlation between urban area and air pollution parameters.
Figure 3. Correlation between urban area and air pollution parameters.
Land 14 01945 g003
Figure 4. Monthly mean TROPOMI Aerosol Index (AI) for Türkiye, between 2019 and 2024.
Figure 4. Monthly mean TROPOMI Aerosol Index (AI) for Türkiye, between 2019 and 2024.
Land 14 01945 g004
Figure 5. Monthly mean CO2 (×1018 molecules/cm2) for Türkiye, between 2019 and 2024.
Figure 5. Monthly mean CO2 (×1018 molecules/cm2) for Türkiye, between 2019 and 2024.
Land 14 01945 g005
Figure 6. Monthly mean HCHO (×1016 molecules/cm2) for Türkiye, between 2019 and 2024.
Figure 6. Monthly mean HCHO (×1016 molecules/cm2) for Türkiye, between 2019 and 2024.
Land 14 01945 g006
Figure 7. Monthly mean NO2 (×1015 molecules/cm2) for Türkiye, between 2019 and 2024.
Figure 7. Monthly mean NO2 (×1015 molecules/cm2) for Türkiye, between 2019 and 2024.
Land 14 01945 g007
Figure 8. Monthly mean O3 (×1018 molecules/cm2) for Türkiye, between 2019 and 2024.
Figure 8. Monthly mean O3 (×1018 molecules/cm2) for Türkiye, between 2019 and 2024.
Land 14 01945 g008
Figure 9. Monthly mean SO2 (×1015 molecules/cm2) for Türkiye, between 2019 and 2024.
Figure 9. Monthly mean SO2 (×1015 molecules/cm2) for Türkiye, between 2019 and 2024.
Land 14 01945 g009
Figure 10. Monthly AI change detection for Türkiye, between 2019 and 2024.
Figure 10. Monthly AI change detection for Türkiye, between 2019 and 2024.
Land 14 01945 g010
Figure 11. Monthly CO2 (×1018 molecules/cm2) change detection for Türkiye, between 2019 and 2024.
Figure 11. Monthly CO2 (×1018 molecules/cm2) change detection for Türkiye, between 2019 and 2024.
Land 14 01945 g011
Figure 12. Monthly HCHO (×1016 molecules/cm2) change detection for Türkiye, between 2019 and 2024.
Figure 12. Monthly HCHO (×1016 molecules/cm2) change detection for Türkiye, between 2019 and 2024.
Land 14 01945 g012
Figure 13. Monthly NO2 (×1015 molecules/cm2) change detection for Türkiye, between 2019 and 2024.
Figure 13. Monthly NO2 (×1015 molecules/cm2) change detection for Türkiye, between 2019 and 2024.
Land 14 01945 g013
Figure 14. Monthly O3 (×1018 molecules/cm2) change detection for Türkiye, between 2019 and 2024.
Figure 14. Monthly O3 (×1018 molecules/cm2) change detection for Türkiye, between 2019 and 2024.
Land 14 01945 g014
Figure 15. Monthly SO2 (×1015 molecules/cm2) change detection for Türkiye, between 2019 and 2024.
Figure 15. Monthly SO2 (×1015 molecules/cm2) change detection for Türkiye, between 2019 and 2024.
Land 14 01945 g015
Figure 16. Landsat-based and MODIS-based LULC map for Türkiye in 2023.
Figure 16. Landsat-based and MODIS-based LULC map for Türkiye in 2023.
Land 14 01945 g016
Figure 17. MODIS-based monthly mean NDVI maps for Türkiye.
Figure 17. MODIS-based monthly mean NDVI maps for Türkiye.
Land 14 01945 g017
Figure 18. MODIS-based monthly LST (°C) maps for Türkiye.
Figure 18. MODIS-based monthly LST (°C) maps for Türkiye.
Land 14 01945 g018
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Çelik, M.A.; Bilik, A.; Akiner, M.E.; Gemeda, D.O. How Do Land Use/Cover Changes Influence Air Quality in Türkiye? A Satellite-Based Assessment. Land 2025, 14, 1945. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14101945

AMA Style

Çelik MA, Bilik A, Akiner ME, Gemeda DO. How Do Land Use/Cover Changes Influence Air Quality in Türkiye? A Satellite-Based Assessment. Land. 2025; 14(10):1945. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14101945

Chicago/Turabian Style

Çelik, Mehmet Ali, Adile Bilik, Muhammed Ernur Akiner, and Dessalegn Obsi Gemeda. 2025. "How Do Land Use/Cover Changes Influence Air Quality in Türkiye? A Satellite-Based Assessment" Land 14, no. 10: 1945. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14101945

APA Style

Çelik, M. A., Bilik, A., Akiner, M. E., & Gemeda, D. O. (2025). How Do Land Use/Cover Changes Influence Air Quality in Türkiye? A Satellite-Based Assessment. Land, 14(10), 1945. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14101945

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop