# Using Fuzzy Logic to Analyze the Spatial Distribution of Pottery in Unstratified Archaeological Sites: The Case of the Pobedim Hillfort (Slovakia)

^{1}

^{2}

^{3}

^{4}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Materials and Methods

#### 2.1. Study Site Description—Pobedim Hillfort

#### 2.2. Fieldwork Methodology

#### 2.3. Fuzzy Sets

#### 2.4. Analytical Workflow

- -
- Field data collection during the archaeological research.
- -
- 3D modeling of the depths of all archeological finds using the ArcScene 10.2.2 software (Figure 5). This particular visualization represents the maximum depth in each individual excavation pit. In this study, 3D models were used for visualization purposes only in order for the reader to have a better idea of the depths of the individual excavation pits.
- -
- Vectorization of data collected in the field using ArcGIS 10.2.2 software.
- -
- Classification of the occurrence of pottery finds and their quantity in specific depth layers, using five intervals (Table 1). Due to the number of excavation pits in individual squares, the interval sorting was not performed since the maximum number of excavation pits in one square was three. Since clusters of archaeological finds (pottery) were created on the basis of two observed criteria (existence of pottery finds and their quantity in specific depth layers), there will be 25 possible combinations (clusters) when using classical statistical methods. If we limit the number of clusters, i.e., they will be determined in advance, those features that will not meet the required criteria will not be classified at all. However, the use of fuzzy set methods allowed us, based on the use of a membership function, to include also those features in the cluster that met the given attribute only to the required level. In this case, the value of 0.9 was used, as mentioned also later.
- -
- Conversion of the vector layers to raster layers using the Feature to Raster tool for further raster analysis in ArcGIS. The reason for converting vector to raster layers is that fuzzy tools, which are mentioned in the next step, work only with raster data.
- -
- Use of fuzzy set theory methods in ArcGIS, specifically the Fuzzy Membership tool (Linear function) and the Fuzzy Overlay tool (gamma operator) to obtain fuzzy clusters.

#### 2.5. Fuzzy Membership (Linear Function)

#### 2.6. Fuzzy Overlay (Gamma Operator)

## 3. Results

## 4. Discussion

## 5. Conclusions

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Data Availability Statement

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Bialeková, D. Výskum a Rekonštrukcia Fortifikácie na Slovanskom Hradisku v Pobedime; Slovenská Archeológia: Nitra, Slovakia, 1978; Volume XXVI-1. [Google Scholar]
- Bialeková, D. Pobedim v Praveku, Pobedim v Dobe Rímskej a v Dobe St’ahovania Národov, Pobedim v Dobe Slovanskej; SAV: Bratislava, Slovakia, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Orlando, L. GPR to constrain ERT data inversion in cavity searching: Theoretical and practical applications in archeology. J. Appl. Geophys.
**2013**, 89, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Fernandes, R.; Geeven, G.; Soetens, S.; Klontza-Jaklova, V. Deletion/Substitution/Addition (DSA) model selection algorithm applied to the study of archaeological settlement patterning. J. Archaeol. Sci.
**2011**, 38, 2293–2300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Terrón, J.M.; Mayoral, V.; Salgado, J.A.; Galea, F.A.; Pérez, V.H.; Odriozola, C.; Mateos, O.; Pizzo, A. Use of Soil Apparent Electrical Resistivity Contact Sensors for the Extensive Study of Archaeological Sites. Archaeol. Prospect.
**2015**, 22, 269–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bitelli, G.; Girelli, V.A.; Sammarini, G. 4-dimensional recording and visualization of urban archeological excavations. Appl. Geomat.
**2018**, 10, 415–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cornett, R.L.; Ernenwein, E.G. Object-Based Image Analysis of Ground-Penetrating Radar Data for Archaic Hearths. Remote Sens.
**2020**, 12, 2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Masini, N.; Capozzoli, L.; Chen, P.P.; Chen, F.L.; Romano, G.; Lu, P.; Tang, P.P.; Sileo, M.; Ge, Q.F.; Lasaponara, R. Towards an Operational Use of Geophysics for Archaeology in Henan (China): Methodological Approach and Results in Kaifeng. Remote Sens.
**2017**, 9, 809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Bikdeli, S. Redevelopment modeling for land suitability evaluation of the suburb brown-fields using fuzzy logic and GIS, northeastern Iran. Environ. Dev. Sustain.
**2020**, 22, 6213–6232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Nabati, J.; Nezami, A.; Neamatollahi, E.; Akbari, M. GIS-based agro-ecological zoning for crop suitability using fuzzy inference system in semi-arid regions. Ecol. Indic.
**2020**, 117, 6646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Aghaloo, K.; Chiu, Y.R. Identifying Optimal Sites for a Rainwater-Harvesting Agricultural Scheme in Iran Using the Best-Worst Method and Fuzzy Logic in a GIS-Based Decision Support System. Water
**2020**, 12, 1913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Seyedmohammadi, J.; Navidi, M.N.; Esmaeelnejad, L. Geospatial modeling of surface soil texture of agricultural land using fuzzy logic, geostatistics and GIS techniques. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal.
**2019**, 50, 1452–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hamer, W.B.; Knitter, D.; Grimm, S.B.; Serbe, B.; Eriksen, B.V.; Nakoinz, O.; Duttmann, R. Location Modeling of Final Palaeolithic Sites in Northern Germany. Geosciences
**2019**, 9, 430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Knitter, D.; Brozio, J.P.; Doerfler, W.; Duttmann, R.; Feeser, I.; Hamer, W.; Kirleis, W.; Mueller, J.; Nakoinz, O. Transforming landscapes: Modeling land-use patterns of environmental borderlands. Holocene
**2019**, 29, 1572–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Coughlan, M.R.; Nelson, D.R. Geostatistical analysis of historical contingency and land use footprints in the prehistoric settlement dynamics of the South Carolina Piedmont, North America. J. Archaeol. Sci.
**2019**, 107, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Taheri, S.M.; Ghadim, F.I.; Kabirian, M. Application of Fuzzy Inference Systems in Archaeology. In Proceedings of the 7th Iranian Joint Congress on Fuzzy and Intelligent Systems (CFIS), Bojnord, Iran, 29–31 January 2019; pp. 79–82. [Google Scholar]
- Belussi, A.; Migliorini, S. A spatio-temporal framework for managing archeological data. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell.
**2017**, 80, 175–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kempf, M. Modeling multivariate landscape affordances and functional ecosystem connectivity in landscape archeology. Archaeol. Anthr. Sci.
**2020**, 12, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zupancich, A.; Mutri, G.; Caricola, I.; Carra, M.L.; Radini, A.; Cristiani, E. The application of 3D modeling and spatial analysis in the study of groundstones used in wild plants processing. Archaeol. Anthr. Sci.
**2019**, 11, 4801–4827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Kaya, A.T. A Spatial Analysis of the Ancient Theater in Konuralp with Respect to the Urban Fabric. In Cultural Sustainable Tourism; Springer: Cham, Germany, 2019; pp. 3–11. [Google Scholar]
- Di Leo, P.; Bavusi, M.; Corrado, G.; Danese, M.; Giammatteo, T.; Gioia, D.; Schiattarella, M. Ancient settlement dynamics and predictive archaeological models for the Metapontum coastal area in Basilicata, southern Italy: From geomorphological survey to spatial analysis. J. Coast. Conserv.
**2018**, 22, 865–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Vojteková, J.; Vojtek, M.; Tirpáková, A.; Vlkolinská, I. Spatial Analysis of Pottery Presence at the Former Pobedim Hillfort (an Archeological Site in Slovakia). Sustainability
**2019**, 11, 6873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Niknami, K.A.; Amirkhiz, A.C.; Jalali, F. Spatial pattern of archaeological site distributions on the eastern shores of Lake Urmia, northwestern Iran. Archeol. Calc.
**2009**, 20, 261–276. [Google Scholar] - Chropovský, B. K otázke postavenia slovanských hradísk na Slovensku a úloha ich výskumu. In Zborník FF Historica 15; Comenius University: Bratislava, Slovakia, 1964; pp. 9–29. [Google Scholar]
- Lieskovský, T.; Faixová Chalachanová, J. The assessment of the chosen LiDAR data sources in Slovakia for the archaeological spatial analysis. In Advances and Trends in Geodesy, Cartography and Geoinformatics II, Proceedings of the 11th International Scientific and Professional Conference on Geodesy, Cartography and Geoinformatics (GCG 2019), Demänovská Dolina, Low Tatras, Slovakia, 10–13 September 2019; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Golden, C.; Murtha, T.; Cook, B.; Shaffer, D.S.; Schroder, W.; Hermitt, E.J.; Firpi, O.A.; Scherer, A.K. Reanalyzing environmental lidar data for archaeology: Mesoamerican applications and implications. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep.
**2016**, 9, 293–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Fisher, C.T.; Fernández-Diaz, J.C.; Cohen, A.S.; Neil Cruz, O.; Gonzáles, A.M.; Leisz, S.J.; Pezzutti, F.; Shrestha, R.; Carter, W. Identifying Ancient Settlement Patterns through LiDAR in the Mosquitia Region of Honduras. PLoS ONE
**2016**, 11, e0159890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Inomata, T.; Pinzón, F.; Ranchos, J.L.; Haraguchi, T.; Nasu, H.; Fernandez-Diaz, J.C.; Aoyama, K.; Yonenobu, H. Archaeological Application of Airborne LiDAR with Object-Based Vegetation Classification and Visualization Techniques at the Lowland Maya Site of Ceibal, Guatemala. Remote Sens.
**2017**, 9, 563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Chase, A.F.; Chase, D.Z.; Weishampel, J.F.; Drake, J.B.; Shrestha, R.L.; Slatton, K.C.; Awe, J.J.; Carter, W.E. Airborne LiDAR, archaeology, and the ancient Maya landscape at Caracol, Belize. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep.
**2011**, 38, 387–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Opitz, R.S.; Cowley, D.C. Interpreting Archaeological Topography: Airborne Laser Scanning, 3D Data and Ground Observation; Oxbow Books: Oxford, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Kokalj, Ž.; Somrak, M. Why Not a Single Image? Combining Visualizations to Facilitate Fieldwork and On-Screen Mapping. Remote Sens.
**2019**, 11, 747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Robinson, V.B. A perspective on the fundamentals of fuzzy sets and their use in geographical information systems. Trans. GIS
**2003**, 7, 3–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Vojteková, J.; Vojtek, M. GIS-Based Landscape Stability Analysis: A Comparison of Overlay Method and Fuzzy Model for the Case Study in Slovakia. Prof. Geog.
**2019**, 71, 631–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hall, G.B.; Wang, F.; Subaryono, F. Comparison of Boolean and fuzzy classification methods in land suitability analysis by using geographical information systems. Environ. Plan. A
**1992**, 24, 497–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ďuračiová, R. Multikriteriálne rozhodovanie pomocou fuzzy množín v prostredí GIS a jeho využitie v archeologickej predikcii. Geod. Carto. Rev.
**2011**, 57, 205–215. [Google Scholar] - Zadeh, L.A. Fuzzy sets. Inform. Control
**1965**, 8, 338–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Zimmerman, H.J. Fuzzy Set Theory—and Its Applications; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1985. [Google Scholar]
- Zimmerman, H.J. Fuzzy decision support systems. In Computational Intelligence: Soft Computing and Fuzzy-Neuro Integration with Applications; Kaynak, O., Zadeh, L.A., Türkşen, B., Rudas, I.J., Eds.; NATO ASI Series (Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences); Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1998; pp. 198–229. [Google Scholar]
- Dubois, D.; Prade, H. Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications; Academic: New York, NY, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
- ESRI. ArcGIS Resources. 2014. Available online: http://resources.arcgis.com (accessed on 2 December 2020).
- MacMillian, W.D. An introduction to the theory of fuzzy sets in the context of the construction of representational spatial economic theory. In Towards the Dynamic Analysis of Spatial Systems; Martin, R.L., Thrift, N.J., Bennett, R.J., Eds.; Pion: London, UK, 1978; pp. 36–52. [Google Scholar]
- Nyimbili, P.H.; Erden, T. A Combined Model of GIS and Fuzzy Logic Evaluation for Locating Emergency Facilities: A Case Study of Istanbul. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Cartography and GIS, Nessebar, Bulgaria, 15–20 June 2020; Bandrova, T., Konečný, M., Marinova, S., Eds.; pp. 191–203. [Google Scholar]
- Bonham-Carter, G.F. Geographic Information Systems for Geoscientists: Modeling with GIS; Pergamon: Oxford, UK, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Bianchini, S.; Solari, L.; Del Soldato, M.; Raspini, F.; Montalti, R.; Ciampalini, A.; Casagli, N. Ground Subsidence Susceptibility (GSS) Mapping in Grosseto Plain (Tuscany, Italy) Based on Satellite InSAR Data Using Frequency Ratio and Fuzzy Logic. Remote Sens.
**2019**, 11, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Gordienko, A.V. The Medieval Batyrskaya Settlement Borovikovo. Tomsk State Univ. J.
**2019**, 440, 106–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Alwan, I.A.; Aziz, N.A.; Hamoodi, M.N. Potential Water Harvesting Sites Identification Using Spatial Multi-Criteria Evaluation in Maysan Province, Iraq. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf.
**2020**, 9, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Espada, R. Integrating information and communications technology (ICT) assets in assessing tropical cyclone risk in the Philippines. Int. J. Disaster Risk Red.
**2019**, 39, 101141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tafreshi, A.M.; Tafreshi, G.M.; Keshavarzi, M.H.B. Qualitative zoning of groundwater to assessment suitable drinking water using fuzzy logic spatial modelling via GIS. Water Environ. J.
**2018**, 32, 607–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kominácká, J. Moderní Informační Technologie pro Podporu Vyhodnocení Prostorových Indikátorů Kvality Života; Konvoj: Brno, Czech Republic, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Murphy, K.M.; Gittings, B.; Crow, J. Visibility analysis of the Roman communication network in southern Scotland. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep.
**2018**, 17, 111–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Hermon, S.; Niccolucci, F. Formally Defining the Time-Space-Archaeological Culture Relation: Problems and Prospects. Archaeol. Calc.
**2017**, 28, 93–108. [Google Scholar] - Malinverni, E.S.; Fangi, G. Comparative cluster analysis to localize emergencies in archaeology. J. Cult. Herit.
**2009**, 10, e10–e19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

**Figure 1.**Reconstruction of the watchtower according to Bialeková [1].

**Figure 3.**LiDAR visualization of the former Pobedim hillfort using CloudCompare 2.12 software (Source of products LLS: Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre Authority of the Slovak Republic). The study site is currently covered by the arable land.

**Figure 7.**Comparison of results using the fuzzy overlay method (gamma operator equals 0.9) and spatial autocorrelation method (as presented by Vojteková et al. [22]).

Depth Intervals | Number of Pottery Fragments in Interval |
---|---|

<30 cm | <70 |

31–60 cm | 71–140 |

61–90 cm | 141–210 |

91–120 cm | 211–280 |

>121 cm | >281 |

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |

© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Tirpáková, A.; Vojteková, J.; Vojtek, M.; Vlkolinská, I.
Using Fuzzy Logic to Analyze the Spatial Distribution of Pottery in Unstratified Archaeological Sites: The Case of the Pobedim Hillfort (Slovakia). *Land* **2021**, *10*, 103.
https://doi.org/10.3390/land10020103

**AMA Style**

Tirpáková A, Vojteková J, Vojtek M, Vlkolinská I.
Using Fuzzy Logic to Analyze the Spatial Distribution of Pottery in Unstratified Archaeological Sites: The Case of the Pobedim Hillfort (Slovakia). *Land*. 2021; 10(2):103.
https://doi.org/10.3390/land10020103

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Tirpáková, Anna, Jana Vojteková, Matej Vojtek, and Ivona Vlkolinská.
2021. "Using Fuzzy Logic to Analyze the Spatial Distribution of Pottery in Unstratified Archaeological Sites: The Case of the Pobedim Hillfort (Slovakia)" *Land* 10, no. 2: 103.
https://doi.org/10.3390/land10020103