Next Article in Journal
Hydrological Design of Two Low-Impact Development Techniques in a Semi-Arid Climate Zone of Central Mexico
Next Article in Special Issue
Valuation of Hidden Water Ecosystem Services: The Replacement Cost of the Aquifer System in Central Mexico
Previous Article in Journal
Regional Correlation between Precipitation and Vegetation in the Huang-Huai-Hai River Basin, China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Is the Achievement of “Good Status” for German Surface Waters Disproportionately Expensive?—Comparing Two Approaches to Assess Disproportionately High Costs in the Context of the European Water Framework Directive
Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

Accounting for the Assimilative Capacity of Water Systems in Scotland

by Paula Novo 1,2
1
Land Economy, Environment and Society Group, Scotland’s Rural College (SRUC), Edinburgh EH9 3JG, Scotland, UK
2
Social, Economic and Geographical Sciences Group, The James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, Scotland, UK
Water 2017, 9(8), 559; https://doi.org/10.3390/w9080559
Received: 16 June 2017 / Revised: 13 July 2017 / Accepted: 21 July 2017 / Published: 26 July 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Water Economics and Policy)
A key methodological challenge in understanding the relationship between the economy and the underlying ecosystem base resides in how to account for the ecosystem’s degradation and the decline of associated ecosystem services. In this study, we use information on nutrients and metals concentrations from the Environmental Change Network (ECN) database and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) for the period 2000–2010 in order to assess the assimilation capacity of water systems. The research covers five upstream sites and 17 downstream sites in northeast Scotland. Our results highlight the relevance of considering a number of pollutants, and suggest that elements such as arsenic, lead and mercury can pose a threat to ecosystems’ sustainability and health. However, little research has been done in terms of their assimilation capacity and their impact on grey water footprint assessments. In addition, the results indicate that background conditions might be relevant when performing sustainability analysis at different spatial scales. The study also poses relevant questions in relation to land management approaches versus traditional ‘end-of-pipe’ water treatment approaches, and the definition of maximum and background concentrations. In this regard, further studies will be required to understand the trade-offs between different ecosystem services depending on how these concentrations are defined. View Full-Text
Keywords: water quality; water pollution level; assimilative capacity; grey water footprint; nutrients; metals; Scotland water quality; water pollution level; assimilative capacity; grey water footprint; nutrients; metals; Scotland
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Novo, P. Accounting for the Assimilative Capacity of Water Systems in Scotland. Water 2017, 9, 559.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop