Next Article in Journal
Flood Damage Modeling on the Basis of Urban Structure Mapping Using High-Resolution Remote Sensing Data
Previous Article in Journal
Tracking Inflows in Lake Wivenhoe during a Major Flood Using Optical Spectroscopy
Article

Comparing Two Methods of Determining Infiltration Rates of Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavers

1
Stormwater Research Group, School of Science and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC 4558, Australia
2
Urban Water Management, Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences, Frankfurt am Main 60318, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2014, 6(8), 2353-2366; https://doi.org/10.3390/w6082353
Received: 30 May 2014 / Revised: 30 July 2014 / Accepted: 4 August 2014 / Published: 8 August 2014
Adequate infiltration through Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavements (PICPs) is critical to their hydraulic performance. Detected by monitoring infiltration performance, reduced infiltration rates can indicate that maintenance is required. Measurement of infiltration rates has previously been problematic on PICPs because of a lack of accepted standard methodologies and the practical difficulties in modifying existing testing methodologies. On large sites, standard methodologies necessitate multiple measurements to achieve accuracy. Standard methods also contend with practical issues such as sealing the rings to the surface to prevent lateral water flow. This study examined the performance of two PICP surface infiltration rate measurement methods: a modified double-ring infiltrometer (DRIT), and a specially designed rainfall simulation infiltrometer (RSIT). A positive correlation (R2 = 0.85) of results was found between the two, demonstrating that the RSIT was comparable to the DRIT. The modified DRIT produced surface infiltration results approximately 60% higher than the RSIT results. The RSIT provided lower variation between tests, requiring fewer measurements in large sites whilst still maintaining accuracy, thereby improving testing efficiency. The new RSIT method also eliminates some of the practical difficulties with existing methodologies such as unrealistic pressure heads artificially increasing infiltration rates, and the use of sealant under test measurement infiltration rings. View Full-Text
Keywords: Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavements; clogging; infiltration testing; water sensitive urban design Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavements; clogging; infiltration testing; water sensitive urban design
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

W.B.Nichols, P.; Lucke, T.; Dierkes, C. Comparing Two Methods of Determining Infiltration Rates of Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavers. Water 2014, 6, 2353-2366. https://doi.org/10.3390/w6082353

AMA Style

W.B.Nichols P, Lucke T, Dierkes C. Comparing Two Methods of Determining Infiltration Rates of Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavers. Water. 2014; 6(8):2353-2366. https://doi.org/10.3390/w6082353

Chicago/Turabian Style

W.B.Nichols, Peter, Terry Lucke, and Carsten Dierkes. 2014. "Comparing Two Methods of Determining Infiltration Rates of Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavers" Water 6, no. 8: 2353-2366. https://doi.org/10.3390/w6082353

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop