Next Article in Journal
Simplified Flood Inundation Mapping Based On Flood Elevation-Discharge Rating Curves Using Satellite Images in Gauged Watersheds
Next Article in Special Issue
Water Banks: Using Managed Aquifer Recharge to Meet Water Policy Objectives
Previous Article in Journal
Response of Vegetables to Cadmium-Enriched Soil

Economics of Managed Aquifer Recharge

Schlumberger Water Services, 1567 Hayley Lane, Suite 202, Fort Myers, FL 33907, USA
Water 2014, 6(5), 1257-1279;
Received: 2 January 2014 / Revised: 9 April 2014 / Accepted: 6 May 2014 / Published: 9 May 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Policy and Economics of Managed Aquifer Recharge and Water Banking)
Managed aquifer recharge (MAR) technologies can provide a variety of water resources management benefits by increasing the volume of stored water and improving water quality through natural aquifer treatment processes. Implementation of MAR is often hampered by the absence of a clear economic case for the investment to construct and operate the systems. Economic feasibility can be evaluated using cost benefit analysis (CBA), with the challenge of monetizing benefits. The value of water stored or treated by MAR systems can be evaluated by direct and indirect measures of willingness to pay including market price, alternative cost, value marginal product, damage cost avoided, and contingent value methods. CBAs need to incorporate potential risks and uncertainties, such as failure to meet performance objectives. MAR projects involving high value uses, such as potable supply, tend to be economically feasible provided that local hydrogeologic conditions are favorable. They need to have low construction and operational costs for lesser value uses, such as some irrigation. Such systems should therefore be financed by project beneficiaries, but dichotomies may exist between beneficiaries and payers. Hence, MAR projects in developing countries may be economically viable, but external support is often required because of limited local financial resources. View Full-Text
Keywords: MAR; ASR; economics; cost-benefit analysis; aquifers; policy MAR; ASR; economics; cost-benefit analysis; aquifers; policy
MDPI and ACS Style

Maliva, R.G. Economics of Managed Aquifer Recharge. Water 2014, 6, 1257-1279.

AMA Style

Maliva RG. Economics of Managed Aquifer Recharge. Water. 2014; 6(5):1257-1279.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maliva, Robert G. 2014. "Economics of Managed Aquifer Recharge" Water 6, no. 5: 1257-1279.

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop