Next Article in Journal
An Approach Using a 1D Hydraulic Model, Landsat Imaging and Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation for an Approximation of Flood Discharge
Next Article in Special Issue
Impact of Damaging Geo-Hydrological Events and Population Development in Calabria, Southern Italy
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Uncertainties in Flow-Duration-Frequency Relationships of High and Low Flow Extremes in Lake Victoria Basin
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Water 2013, 5(4), 1580-1597;

Flood Risk in Australia: Whose Responsibility Is It, Anyway?

Department of Environment and Geography, Macquarie University, Sydney 2109, Australia
Stockholm Environment Institute, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
Risk Frontiers, Macquarie University, Sydney 2109, Australia
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 5 August 2013 / Revised: 27 August 2013 / Accepted: 18 September 2013 / Published: 7 October 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Flood Estimation and Analysis in a Variable and Changing Environment)
Full-Text   |   PDF [226 KB, uploaded 9 June 2015]


This paper presents research into four key stakeholders in flood risk management in Australia: local councils, the insurance industry, the State Emergency Service (SES), and local residents; examining the perception of their own roles and responsibilities, and those of the other stakeholders. Key informant interviews were conducted in four locations—Brisbane and Emerald, in Queensland, Dora Creek, in New South Wales, and Benalla, in Victoria. We find that understanding of the roles and responsibilities of each stakeholder varied considerably between research participants. Insurance representatives felt their concerns about increasing flood risk costs were unheeded until the 2010–2011 floods made them the “canary in the coal mine”. Councils felt they had limited options for reducing flood risk. SES representatives felt they were too relied upon for event response, with requests for assistance outstripping their capacity to assist, and many residents were uncertain how to prepare for flood, relying on emergency agencies and the local council to protect them. Key lessons for flood risk management in Australia are (a) an urgent need for all stakeholders to better understand each others’ roles and responsibilities; and (b) residents must take greater responsibility for their own personal protection. Only then can the vision of shared responsibility presented by the 2009 National Strategy for Disaster Resilience be achieved. View Full-Text
Keywords: flood risk management; responsibility; stakeholders; perception; 2010–2011 floods; Australia flood risk management; responsibility; stakeholders; perception; 2010–2011 floods; Australia
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Box, P.; Thomalla, F.; van den Honert, R. Flood Risk in Australia: Whose Responsibility Is It, Anyway? Water 2013, 5, 1580-1597.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Water EISSN 2073-4441 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top