Next Article in Journal
Sustainable Agro-Food Industrial Wastewater Treatment Using High Rate Anaerobic Process
Next Article in Special Issue
Mountain Pine Beetles, Salvage Logging, and Hydrologic Change: Predicting Wet Ground Areas
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Spatial Model Assessment of P Transport from Soils to Waterways in an Eastern Mediterranean Watershed
Article

Comparative Assessment of Stormwater and Nonpoint Source Pollution Best Management Practices in Suburban Watershed Management

Department of Chemistry and Environmental Science, New Jersey Institute of Technology, University Heights, Newark, NJ 07102, USA
Water 2013, 5(1), 280-291; https://doi.org/10.3390/w5010280
Received: 18 February 2013 / Revised: 5 March 2013 / Accepted: 7 March 2013 / Published: 13 March 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ecological Watershed Management)
Nonpoint source pollution control and stormwater management are two objectives in managing mixed land use watersheds like those in New Jersey. Various best management practices (BMPs) have been developed and implemented to achieve both objectives. This study assesses the cost-effectiveness of selected BMPs for agricultural nonpoint source pollution control and stormwater management in the Neshanic River watershed, a typical mixed land use watershed in central New Jersey, USA. The selected BMPs for nonpoint source pollution control include cover crops, prescribed grazing, livestock access control, contour farming, nutrient management, and conservation buffers. The selected BMPs for stormwater management are rain gardens, roadside ditch retrofitting, and detention basin retrofitting. Cost-effectiveness is measured by the reduction in pollutant loads in total suspended solids and total phosphorus relative to the total costs of implementing the selected BMPs. The pollution load reductions for these BMPs are based on the total pollutant loads in the watershed simulated by the Soil and Water Assessment Tool and achievable pollutant reduction rates. The total implementation cost includes BMP installation and maintenance costs. The assessment results indicate that the BMPs for the nonpoint source pollution control are generally much more cost-effective in improving water quality than the BMPs for stormwater management. View Full-Text
Keywords: suburban watershed management; stormwater BMPs; agricultural BMPs; cost-effectiveness; Neshanic River watershed; Soil and Water Assessment Tool; nonpoint source pollution suburban watershed management; stormwater BMPs; agricultural BMPs; cost-effectiveness; Neshanic River watershed; Soil and Water Assessment Tool; nonpoint source pollution
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Qiu, Z. Comparative Assessment of Stormwater and Nonpoint Source Pollution Best Management Practices in Suburban Watershed Management. Water 2013, 5, 280-291. https://doi.org/10.3390/w5010280

AMA Style

Qiu Z. Comparative Assessment of Stormwater and Nonpoint Source Pollution Best Management Practices in Suburban Watershed Management. Water. 2013; 5(1):280-291. https://doi.org/10.3390/w5010280

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qiu, Zeyuan. 2013. "Comparative Assessment of Stormwater and Nonpoint Source Pollution Best Management Practices in Suburban Watershed Management" Water 5, no. 1: 280-291. https://doi.org/10.3390/w5010280

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop