Hydrochemical Characteristics and Genetic Analysis of Groundwater in Zhanjiang City, Guangdong Province, South China
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Sample Collection and Analysis
2.3. Methodology
2.3.1. Clustering Method
2.3.2. Hydro-Geochemistry Analysis Methods
2.3.3. Geochemical Modeling
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Basic Statistical Characteristics
3.2. Characteristics of Hydrochemical Types
3.3. Correlation Analysis of Hydrogeochemical Indexes
3.4. Hierarchical Clustering Method
3.5. Analysis of the Formation Mechanism of Hydrochemistry
3.5.1. Rock Weathering Process
3.5.2. Filtration Effect
3.5.3. Evaporative Concentration and Ion Exchange
3.5.4. Impact of Human Activities
4. Conclusions
- (1)
- Groundwater chemical type and ionic characteristics: The dominant cations and anions in the research area are Na+ and HCO3−, respectively. Shallow water is mainly of Cl•SO4 mixed type, followed by HCO3•ClNa•Ca type, which is influenced by various hydrogeochemical processes and human activities. The hydrochemical types are complex and diverse, with unclear zoning. The middle and deep pore water is mainly composed of HCO3Na type water, followed by HCO3Na•Mg type and HCO3Na•Ca type water, with a significant increase in Na+ content along the groundwater flow direction. The hydrochemical types of pore and fissure water are Cl•HCO3Mg•Na type and Cl•HCO3Na type water. Three samples of shallow water exhibit nitrate-type water, whose NO3− concentration is greatly affected by human activities.
- (2)
- Water–rock interactions and human impact: According to Gibbs, rock leaching predominantly affects the hydrochemical composition of groundwater samples. The proportion of major ions further reveals that the dissolution of silicate minerals and evaporite minerals (such as gypsum) are important in the groundwater chemistry affecting the study area. Cluster analyses further revealed the spatial distribution features of groundwater chemical types, indicating similarities and differences between groundwater samples and suggesting common controlling factors. In addition, the chemical composition of intermediate and deep groundwater is influenced by carbonate mineral dissolution and cation exchange processes. Shallow water and fissure water are to some extent controlled by the dissolution of evaporite minerals, and evaporative concentration contributes significantly to the chemical composition of shallow water.
- (3)
- Groundwater management and optimization of mining practices: Shallow water NO3− is commonly present in the research area, mainly sourced from “three wastes”: agricultural fertilization and breeding and domestic sewage. Human activities have a relatively minor impact on the chemical composition of pore and fissure water. However, the well-developed pore and fissure system in volcanic rocks allows human activities to easily influence the chemical composition of these waters. Additionally, pore water receives lateral recharge from pore and fissure water. Therefore, it is more important to focus on prevention and control. The impact of industrial and mining activities on shallow water is significant, while agricultural activities and domestic sewage cannot be ignored, and the ways and degrees of their impact are complex. The middle and deep pore water is mainly affected by industrial and mining activities. Meanwhile, as groundwater extraction continues, shallow and deep water levels drop.
- (4)
- Perceived threats to groundwater quality: The generally low TDS values indicate that most groundwater samples are of good quality. However, the presence of NO3− in some shallow aquifer samples suggests potential contamination from agricultural and industrial activities. Elevated nitrate levels indicate the use of fertilizers and animal waste in agricultural areas, as well as contributions from mining and industrial zones, particularly in regions with high evaporation rates. To effectively manage groundwater quality, it is essential to monitor additional parameters related to specific human activities, such as heavy metals (Pb, Cd, Hg), organic pollutants (pesticides, volatile organic compounds), and microbial indicators (total coliforms, fecal coliforms). Regular monitoring of these parameters, along with NO3−, will provide a comprehensive understanding of groundwater quality and help guide effective groundwater quality management.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Wu, Y.; Luo, Z.; Luo, W.; Ma, T.; Wang, Y. Analysis of the Impact of Urbanization on Shallow Groundwater in Guiyang Region. Saf. Environ. Eng. 2017, 24, 44–58. [Google Scholar]
- Kun, L.; Xing, L.; Jing, L. Analysis of hydrochemical characteristics of groundwater in the Han River zone of the Jianghan Plain. Saf. Environ. Eng. 2020, 27, 1–9+16. [Google Scholar]
- Luan, F.J.; Zhou, J.L.; Jia, R.L.; Lu, C.X.; Bai, M.; Liang, H.T. Groundwater hydrochemical characteristics and genesis in the Balikun Yiwu Basin, Xinjiang. Environ. Chem. 2017, 36, 380–389. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, Y.; Zhang, F.; Niu, Z.; Dong, Z.; Liu, G.; Gao, L. Hydro-chemical characteristics of groundwater in centralized drinking water sources and its quality assessment in northern Anhui Province. J. Univ. Sci. Technol. China 2014, 44, 913–920, 925. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, C.; Chen, R.; Zhang, Z.; Li, W.; Chen, W. Temporal and spatial variation of hydrochemical characteristics of shallow groundwater in Shanxi Province. Arid. Land Geogr. 2018, 41, 314–324. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, G.; Liu, C.; Sun, J.; Zhang, M.; Jing, J.; Li, L. A regional scale investigation on factors controlling the groundwater chemistry of various aquifers in a rapidly urbanized area: A case study of the Pearl River Delta. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 625, 510–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Xu, M.; Li, X.; Qi, J.; Zhang, Q.; Guo, J.; Yu, L.; Zhao, R. Hydrochemical Characteristics and Multivariate Statistical Analysis of Natural Water System: A Case Study in Kangding County, Southwestern China. Water 2018, 10, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bam, E.K.P.; Bansah, S. Groundwater chemistry and isotopes reveal vulnerability of granitic aquifer in the White Volta River watershed, West Africa. Appl. Geochem. 2020, 119, 104662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruiz-Pico, Á.; Pérez-Cuenca, Á.; Serrano-Agila, R.; Maza-Criollo, D.; Leiva-Piedra, J.; Salazar-Campos, J. Hydrochemical characterization of groundwater in the Loja Basin (Ecuador). Appl. Geochem. 2019, 104, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barzegar, R.; Asghari Moghaddam, A.; Tziritis, E.; Adamowski, J.; Bou Nassar, J.; Noori, M.; Aalami, M.T.; Kazemian, N. Exploring the hydrogeochemical evolution of cold and thermal waters in the Sarein-Nir area, Iran using stable isotopes (δ18O and δD), geothermometry and multivariate statistical approaches. Geothermics 2020, 85, 101815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, C.K.; Kumar, A.; Shashtri, S.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, P.; Mallick, J. Multivariate statistical analysis and geochemical modeling for geochemical assessment of groundwater of Delhi, India. J. Geochem. Explor. 2017, 175, 59–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazakis, N.; Mattas, C.; Pavlou, A.; Patrikaki, O.; Voudouris, K. Multivariate statistical analysis for the assessment of groundwater quality under different hydrogeological regimes. Environ. Earth Sci. 2017, 76, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bindal, S.; Singh, C.K. Predicting groundwater arsenic contamination: Regions at risk in highest populated state of India. Water Res. 2019, 159, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, B.; Li, M.; Li, W.; Zhengwen, J.; Khan, U.; Wang, L.; Wang, F.-Y. Machine learning strategies for lithostratigraphic classification based on geochemical sampling data—A case study in area of Chahanwusu River, Qinghai Province, China. J. Cent. South Univ. 2021, 28, 1422–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, S.F.; Cheng, Y.C.; Xie, H.; An, Y.Q.; Jiang, C.L.; Zheng, L. Hydrochemical characteristics and genesis analysis of limestone groundwater in Panxie mining area. Energy Environ. Prot. 2020, 34, 37–43. [Google Scholar]
- Rong, Z.; Zhongmei, W.; Xiangyang, Z. Analysis of hydrochemical characteristics and influencing factors of karst groundwater in Yangchang River Basin. Saf. Environ. Eng. 2019, 26, 15–20. [Google Scholar]
- Romshoo, S.A.; Dar, R.A.; Murtaza, K.O.; Rashid, I.; Dar, F.A. Hydrochemical characterization and pollution assessment of groundwater in Jammu Siwaliks, India. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2017, 189, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, J.P.; Zhang, Q.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Nie, B.W. Groundwater Chemical Characteristics and Analysis of Their Controlling Factors in an Alluvial Fan of Jianjiang River. Huan Jing Ke Xue = Huanjing Kexue 2019, 40, 3089–3098. [Google Scholar]
- El Alfy, M.; Lashin, A.; Abdalla, F.; Al-Bassam, A. Assessing the hydrogeochemical processes affecting groundwater pollution in arid areas using an integration of geochemical equilibrium and multivariate statistical techniques. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 229, 760–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jing, L. Characteristics and Potential Assessment of Groundwater Resources in Leizhou Peninsula. East China Geol. 2018, 39, 299–304. [Google Scholar]
- Jinmei, Y.; Xun, Z.; Juan, L.; Wenyu, D.; Hong, K.X. Hydrogeochemical characteristics and evolution simulation of groundwater in basalts on the Leizhou Peninsula, Guangdong China. Geol. Bull. China 2007, 26, 323–344. [Google Scholar]
- Xiangqing, H.; Huayang, G.; Jianfei, L.; Shunzhi, Z.; Yi, P. Changes in chemical elements of groundwater along the coast of East China Island in Leizhou Bay and the status of water quality. Proc. Water Resour. Water Eng. 2013, 24, 59–65. [Google Scholar]
- Yanyan, L. Groundwater Chemistry and Availability in Typical Coastal Areas of Zhanjiang City and Hainan Island; South China University of Technology: Guangzhou, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Hongxin, Z.; Ya, W.; Yunyu, L.; Wen, C.; Huaiqing, L. Hydrogeochemical characteristics of groundwater in Lingbei area of Zhanjiang City. Environ. Sci. 2020, 41, 4924–4935. [Google Scholar]
- Min, Z.; Ke, P.; Jun, H.; Xinwen, Z.; Shuangxi, C.; Fengmei, L. Study on groundwater environmental characteristics in eastern Zhanjiang City. Undergr. Water 2018, 40, 17–20+116. [Google Scholar]
- Wangqiong, Z. Optimal design of underground water monitoring network in Zhanjiang City. Saf. Environ. Eng. 2017, 24, 95–99. [Google Scholar]
- Lei, L.; Jiangtao, H.; Cong, P.; Zhenguo, W.; Lei, W. Study on visual background values of subsurface components: A case study of Liujiang basin. Front. Geosci. 2018, 25, 267–275. [Google Scholar]
- Xiaoli, L.; Jingtao, L.; Zhantao, H.; Liang, Z.; Yuxi, Z. Geochemical Characteristics and Driving Factors of NO3- Type Groundwater in the Rapidly Urbanizing Pearl River Delta. Environ. Sci. 2021, 42, 4761–4771. [Google Scholar]
- Gibbs, R.J. Mechanisms controlling world water chemistry. Science 1970, 170, 1088–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Songtao, L.; Dong, Z.; Yuhong, L.; Jinmei, Y.; Shuang, Z.; Yongtao, W.; Xingyu, H.; Zhongyi, Z.; Wei, Y.; Baojun, J. River Source and Control Factors of Hydrochemical Composition in Yiluo River Basin. Huanjing Sci. 2020, 41, 1184–1196. [Google Scholar]
- Jiaqi, C.; Xianyue, L.; Haibin, S.; Yanan, S.; Haijun, A.; Jinping, X. Evolution characteristics and formation mechanism of groundwater chemistry in Hetao irrigation area. Huanjing Sci. 2020, 41, 4011–4020. [Google Scholar]
- Li, C.; Gao, X.; Wang, Y. Hydrogeochemistry of high-fluoride groundwater at Yuncheng Basin, northern China. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 508, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, L.; Dong, Y.; Xu, Z.; Qiao, X. Hydrochemical and isotopic characteristics of groundwater in the northeastern Tennger Desert, northern China. Hydrogeol. J. 2017, 25, 2363–2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huiya, L.; Qi, F.; Lijuan, C.; Yu, Z.; Huaide, Y. Chemical characteristics and evolution driving mechanism of groundwater in Minqin oasis irrigation area. Res. Arid. Zone 2017, 34, 733–740. [Google Scholar]
- Hanzhong, W. Study on Groundwater Cycle and Rational Exploitation and Utilization in Zhanjiang City; China University of Geosciences: Wuhan, China, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Bello, M.; Ketchemen-Tandia, B.; Nlend, B.; Huneau, F.; Fouepe, A.; Fantong, W.Y.; Boum-Nkot, S.N.; Garel, E.; Celle-Jeanton, H. Shallow groundwater quality evolution after 20years of exploitation in the southern Lake Chad: Hydrochemistry and stable isotopes survey in the far north of Cameroon. Environ. Earth Sci. 2019, 78, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.W.; Liang, X.; Jin, M.G.; Ma, T.; Mindeng, Y.; Ma, B. Identifying the groundwater flow systems in a condensed river-network interfluve between the Han River and Yangtze River (China) using hydrogeochemical indicators. Hydrogeol. J. 2019, 27, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Worrall, F.; Howden, N.J.K.; Burt, T.P. Evidence for nitrogen accumulation: The total nitrogen budget of the terrestrial biosphere of a lowland agricultural catchment. Biogeochemistry 2015, 123, 411–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, Z.; Jin, H.; Jingjie, L.; Yuetin, C.; Lei, G.; Jinwei, L.; Chao, B.; Yuemei, C. Chemical characteristics and controlling factors of groundwater in the Hamatong River Basin. Environ. Sci. 2018, 39, 4981–4989. [Google Scholar]
- GB/T 14848-2017; Groundwater Quality Standard. China Standards Press: Beijing, China, 2017.
Aquifer | Statistic Value | pH | TDS | K+ | Na+ | Ca2+ | Mg2+ | Cl− | SO42− | HCO3− | NO3− |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shallow aquifer | min | 5.17 | 79.00 | 1.36 | 8.11 | 12.20 | 2.04 | 8.70 | 5.96 | 6.24 | 0.20 |
max | 8.58 | 409.10 | 71.53 | 70.04 | 61.65 | 11.45 | 50.40 | 76.26 | 270.70 | 50.00 | |
mean | 7.02 | 199.54 | 13.61 | 32.91 | 23.47 | 6.94 | 28.83 | 29.69 | 58.99 | 21.39 | |
SD (Standard Deviation) | 1.10 | 98.66 | 23.69 | 21.18 | 16.26 | 2.63 | 18.38 | 22.94 | 87.75 | 24.36 | |
C.V (Coefficient of Variation) | 0.16 | 0.49 | 1.74 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.38 | 0.64 | 0.77 | 1.49 | 1.14 | |
Middle aquifer | min | 5.03 | 38.00 | 0.77 | 1.12 | 1.21 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 3.57 | 4.22 | 0.00 |
max | 9.45 | 358.40 | 62.85 | 185.00 | 18.89 | 13.26 | 64.30 | 36.94 | 239.15 | 17.50 | |
mean | 7.45 | 129.15 | 8.63 | 29.80 | 7.45 | 4.27 | 12.99 | 11.00 | 77.39 | 1.81 | |
sd | 0.88 | 79.73 | 11.32 | 45.65 | 4.18 | 3.22 | 14.42 | 8.23 | 57.76 | 4.59 | |
cv | 0.12 | 0.62 | 1.31 | 1.53 | 0.56 | 0.75 | 1.11 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 2.53 | |
Deep aquifer | min | 7.12 | 158.00 | 1.16 | 9.58 | 13.00 | 9.93 | 30.00 | 5.00 | 30.16 | 11.30 |
max | 7.91 | 266.00 | 4.09 | 64.50 | 26.80 | 23.10 | 59.00 | 17.80 | 85.04 | 19.20 | |
mean | 7.57 | 215.50 | 2.13 | 36.67 | 19.85 | 15.71 | 40.65 | 9.70 | 57.75 | 14.75 | |
sd | 0.33 | 58.06 | 1.38 | 22.90 | 7.47 | 6.49 | 12.66 | 6.10 | 25.71 | 3.43 | |
cv | 0.04 | 0.27 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.38 | 0.41 | 0.31 | 0.63 | 0.45 | 0.23 |
K+ | Na+ | Ca2+ | Mg2+ | Cl− | SO42− | HCO3− | CO32− | TDS | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K+ | 1 | −0.012 | 0.762 ** | 0.523 ** | 0.028 | 0.694 ** | 0.663 ** | −0.035 | 0.366 * |
Na+ | −0.012 | 1 | 0.010 | 0.064 | 0.992 ** | 0.436 ** | 0.498 ** | 0.969 ** | 0.908 ** |
Ca2+ | 0.762 ** | 0.010 | 1 | 0.709 ** | 0.038 | 0.859 ** | 0.690 ** | −0.060 | 0.405 * |
Mg2+ | 0.523 ** | 0.064 | 0.709 ** | 1 | 0.126 | 0.649 ** | 0.504 ** | −0.053 | 0.362 * |
Cl− | 0.028 | 0.992 ** | 0.038 | 0.126 | 1 | 0.463 ** | 0.479 ** | 0.940 ** | 0.914 ** |
SO42− | 0.694 ** | 0.436 ** | 0.859 ** | 0.649 ** | 0.463 ** | 1 | 0.774 ** | 0.352 * | 0.744 ** |
HCO3− | 0.663 ** | 0.498 ** | 0.690 ** | 0.504 ** | 0.479 ** | 0.774 ** | 1 | 0.501 ** | 0.777 ** |
CO32− | −0.035 | 0.969 ** | −0.060 | −0.053 | 0.940 ** | 0.352 * | 0.501 ** | 1 | 0.858 ** |
TDS | 0.366 * | 0.908 ** | 0.405 * | 0.362 * | 0.914 ** | 0.744 ** | 0.777 ** | 0.858 ** | 1 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Yang, J.; Wang, J.; Zhang, L.; Tan, Y.; Xiang, D. Hydrochemical Characteristics and Genetic Analysis of Groundwater in Zhanjiang City, Guangdong Province, South China. Water 2025, 17, 698. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17050698
Wang Y, Liu Z, Yang J, Wang J, Zhang L, Tan Y, Xiang D. Hydrochemical Characteristics and Genetic Analysis of Groundwater in Zhanjiang City, Guangdong Province, South China. Water. 2025; 17(5):698. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17050698
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Ying, Zhenlin Liu, Junyi Yang, Junxia Wang, Ling Zhang, Yongqing Tan, and Dongjin Xiang. 2025. "Hydrochemical Characteristics and Genetic Analysis of Groundwater in Zhanjiang City, Guangdong Province, South China" Water 17, no. 5: 698. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17050698
APA StyleWang, Y., Liu, Z., Yang, J., Wang, J., Zhang, L., Tan, Y., & Xiang, D. (2025). Hydrochemical Characteristics and Genetic Analysis of Groundwater in Zhanjiang City, Guangdong Province, South China. Water, 17(5), 698. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17050698