Next Article in Journal
Exploration of Runoff Simulation Based on Seasonal Precipitation Characteristics and Its Impact on Hydropower Generation
Next Article in Special Issue
Analysis of Soil Salinization Characteristics in Coastal Area of Panjin City, Liaoning Province
Previous Article in Journal
Optimal Water Resource Allocation for Urban Water Systems in the Context of Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction and Recycled Water Utilization
Previous Article in Special Issue
Numerical Simulations of Extratropical Storm Surge in the Bohai Bay Based on a Coupled Atmosphere–Ocean–Wave Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Spatial–Temporal Change and Dominant Factors of Coastline in Zhuhai City from 1987 to 2022

1
State Key Laboratory of Plateau Ecology and Agriculture, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, China
2
School for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
3
Technology Center of Natural Resources and Planning in Zhuhai, Zhuhai 519015, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Water 2025, 17(17), 2569; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17172569
Submission received: 2 July 2025 / Revised: 10 August 2025 / Accepted: 19 August 2025 / Published: 31 August 2025

Abstract

Understanding the spatiotemporal variations and driving mechanisms of coastlines is crucial for their adequate protection, utilization, and sustainable development. In this study, the changes in various coastline types in Zhuhai from 1987 to 2022 were analyzed by using long-term Landsat and GaoFen satellite imagery. The Index of Coastline Type Diversity (ICTD), Index of Coastline Utilization Degree (ICUD) and the Digital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS) analysis indicators were employed to investigate coastline change. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses were integrated to comprehensively elucidate the impacts of various driving factors. The results indicate that the total length of Zhuhai coastline increased from 761.50 km in 1987 to 798.91 km in 2022, with natural coastlines decreasing by 89.82 km and artificial coastlines increasing by 153.40 km. The rapid expansion of artificial coastlines since 2007 led to a marked decline in the ICTD indicator, while the ICUD indicator increased from 146.42 in 1987 to 216.37 in 2022, reflecting the intensified and continuous influence of anthropogenic activities. Additionally, the end point rate (EPR) and Weighted Linear Regression Rate (WLR) changed by 8.09 m/yr and 6.62 m/yr, respectively. The Shoreline Change Envelope (SCE) and Net Shoreline Movement (NSM) exhibited average changes of 331.42 m and 224.32 m, respectively. Gray correlation and regression analyses further revealed that climate factors exhibited the strongest association with natural coastline changes, while economic development indicators showed the strongest correlation with artificial coastline dynamics. The relationship of Number of Berths in Main Ports (Nb) with coastline changes strongly suggests that human activities are the primary driver of these changes. These findings provide a robust scientific basis for coastal zone management in Zhuhai.

1. Introduction

Coastlines, as critical transitional zones between terrestrial and marine environments, function not only as ecologically sensitive corridors but also as pivotal hubs for anthropogenic activities and resource exploitation [1,2,3]. Globally, coastal zones accommodate approximately 50% of the world’s population [4,5]. In China, more than 50% of medium-sized and larger cities are located in coastal areas, contributing over 60% of the nation’s GDP [6], thereby intensifying the conflict between anthropogenic exploitation and ecological conservation. In recent decades, accelerated sea-level rise (SLR) and coastal erosion have further heightened the risks of coastline retreat. For example, projections suggest that by 2050, SLR-driven erosion may submerge up to 70% of Italy’s beaches [7]. Concurrently, anthropogenic interventions (e.g., land reclamation and port construction) have led to significant morphological fragmentation. In China, artificial coastlines expanded at an annual rate of 14.5% before 2010 [8]. These synergistic effects of natural and anthropogenic stressors necessitate a systematic investigation into the spatiotemporal evolution and multidimensional driving mechanisms of coastlines to reconcile development-conservation dilemmas, enhance coastal resilience, and achieve sustainable governance.
Accurate coastline mapping is fundamental to studying the spatial–temporal change and driving factors of the coastline. Traditional coastline mapping methods based on field surveys have gradually been supplanted by remote sensing technologies, owing to the high cost and labor intensity of ground-based approaches [9,10]. The change in coastline mapping has progressed from the use of single aerial or satellite images to the fusion of hyperspectral and LiDAR data, and from manual interpretation and band statistics to machine learning algorithms [11,12,13]. The research has also expanded from localized key areas to global applications [14,15]. It can be seen that the current research on the spatial–temporal change in the coastline has made significant progress in methodology and application scale. However, there remains a significant gap in the long-term analysis of morphological differentiation, spatial heterogeneity, and multidimensional driving mechanisms in Zhuhai—a core coastal city within China’s Special Economic Zone and the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Existing studies on the coastline of Zhuhai mostly focus on short periods [16,17,18,19], and although some studies have analyzed the long time-series changes in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, most of them are based on administrative divisions, which makes it difficult to reveal the changes in a refined way [20,21,22].
Understanding the spatial–temporal change in coastlines is essential for achieving sustainable development. Previous studies have identified both natural processes and anthropogenic activities as the principal factors influencing coastline changes, with natural factors traditionally regarded as the primary drivers [23]. However, in recent years, intensified anthropogenic activities have emerged as the predominant force behind these changes. Zhang et al. demonstrated through layer superposition and impact analysis that anthropogenic interventions, along with variations in material composition and landforms, play a critical role in shaping the coastlines of Southeast Asian islands [24]. Amrouni et al. found that the retreat of North African coastlines, coupled with rapid urban growth, has accelerated inland seawater intrusion by approximately 5 km, thereby negatively affecting crop production and food security [25]. Above results indicate that anthropogenic processes, rather than natural forces, primarily drive coastline retreat. In addition, Lansu et al. reported that coastal infrastructure development restricts the available space for coastal ecosystems, producing irreversible effects on coastline morphology [26]. Most existing research, however, tends to analyze driving factors using either qualitative or quantitative methods in isolation. Yang et al. combined tidal station data and reclamation project statistics to show that anthropogenic activities have dominated the evolution of mainland China’s coastline over the past 30 years [27]. Wang et al. qualitatively evaluated 50 years of coastline change in Huizhou city and concluded that anthropogenic factors play the dominant role, with natural factors having minimal influence [28]. Relying solely on a single analytical approach may underestimate the complexity and relative influence of various driving factors. Therefore, integrating both qualitative and quantitative analyses is necessary to comprehensively assess the factors influencing coastline changes.
To address the shortcomings in existing research on the spatiotemporal changes and driving factors of Zhuhai coastline, this study establishes a research framework comprising spatiotemporal change analysis, dynamic assessments of utilization and locational shifts, and driving factor evaluation. Utilizing methodologies such as utilization evaluation, the Digital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS), gray correlation analysis, and regression analysis, we extract detailed spatiotemporal data on the coastline, assess changes in utilization and position, and quantify the relative influences of natural and socioeconomic factors to determine the dominant drivers. The objective of this study is to provide a robust scientific basis for coastal zone planning in Zhuhai and offer insights applicable to other estuarine cities.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

Zhuhai is located on the western margin of the Pearl River Estuary (21°48′–22°33′ N, 113°03′–114°19′ E) (Figure 1), which contains multiple islands and embayments, including Hengqin, Gaolan, Hebao and Qi’ao, parts of the Wanshan Archipelago, Xianglu Bay and Jiuzhou Bay. Coastal dynamics are governed by semi-diurnal tides and associated residual currents. Seasonal discharge from the Pearl River drives estuarine circulation and sediment plumes. Wave action and typhoon-driven storm surge reshape the shoreline during extreme events. Longshore sediment transport controls the morphology of beaches, tidal flats and shoals. Changes in river sediment supply and human activities have modified local hydrodynamics and sediment budgets. Human activities include large-scale land reclamation, port construction around Gaolan and Jiuzhou and the Hong Kong–Zhuhai–Macao Bridge with its artificial structures. The region has a subtropical climate with warm temperatures year-round and distinct wet and dry seasons [29]. This climate together with the geographic setting increases vulnerability to sea-level rise, coastal erosion and other climate-change stresses. Recent coastal urbanization has substantially altered the natural landscape and expanded artificial shorelines, particularly around Hengqin and Gaolan islands [30].

2.2. Data

In this study, a combination of Landsat series satellite imagery and GaoFen satellite data was employed as the primary data source (Table 1). Landsat imagery was acquired from the United States Geological Survey Earth Explorer platform (https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov (accessed on 12 December 2024)), and GaoFen data were obtained from ChinaGEOSS Data Sharing Network (https://noda.ac.cn (accessed on 13 December 2024)). Following standardized procedures, the imagery underwent radiometric calibration, mosaic merging and geometric correction to ensure spatial and spectral consistency. These preprocessed images formed the basis for coastline extraction. Coastline features were identified through the visual interpretation approach, in which remote sensing data were analyzed based on the spectral signatures of typical coastline elements. The final delineation of the coastline was conducted in accordance with established coastline classification criteria and definitional principles, ensuring both accuracy and consistency across the temporal dataset.

2.3. Coastline Classification System

Based on the current development status of Zhuhai coast and considering features such as image scale, shape, shadow, color, and the surrounding environment derived from Landsat and high-fraction imagery, the continental coastline in the study area is classified into two primary categories: natural and artificial coastlines [8,31,32]. The natural coastline is further subdivided into bedrock, sandy and biological coastline. In contrast, the artificial coastline is categorized according to the marine functional area classification established by the State Oceanic Administration in China, which includes industrial, port terminal, road and breeding. Table 2 presents the complete classification system for the coastline in the study area.

2.4. Visual Interpretation

Given the characteristics of Zhuhai’s coastline, characterized by an intricate configuration, numerous embayments, extensive muddy shores, and ambiguous land-water boundaries in specific sectors, this study utilized visual interpretation for coastline delineation. This methodology integrated manual interpretation of remote sensing imagery with field verification. Initial interpretation leveraged key features within false-color composite imagery, including tone, texture, geomorphology, and surrounding features. Coastline positions were subsequently determined based on specific type, as detailed in Table 2. Uncertain shoreline segments were confirmed via field surveys to generate the final coastline dataset.

2.5. Methods

2.5.1. Coastline Utilization Index

In this study, the index of coastline type diversity (ICTD) and the index of coastline utilization degree (ICUD) were used to quantify the diversity and utilization intensity of coastline types, respectively. ICTD measure the diversity of coastline types based on their relative lengths [33]. The calculation formula is as follows:
ICTD   =   1 i = 1 n L i 2 i = 1 n L i 2 ,
where ICTD represents the diversity of coastline types in the study area in a certain year, n denotes the total number of coastline types; i indexes each type; Li represents the length of the ith coastline type. The ICTD value ranges from 0 to 1, with values closer to 0 indicating lower diversity and those nearer to 1 signifying a greater complexity and diversity in coastline types. This index is closely related to the proportionate lengths of the various coastline types. The ICUD quantifies the intensity of anthropogenic utilization along the coastline by incorporating both the proportion and the weight of different coastline types [34]. The calculation formula is as follows:
ICUD   =   i = 1 n A i   ×   w i   ×   100 ,
where ICUD indicates the utilization intensity of the coastline in the study area in a certain year; i indexes each type; Ai stands for the proportion of ith length relative to the total coastline; Wi indicates the weight reflecting the degree of anthropogenic activity impact on that type. The higher ICUD value implies that anthropogenic activities exert a stronger influence on the coastline. The weighting factors (Wi) for each coastline type are determined by referring to previous studies (see Table 3 for detailed information) [35,36].

2.5.2. DSAS Analysis

Before performing the DSAS analysis (developed by United States Geological Survey, Reston, VA, USA), transect generation was required. Considering the spatial characteristics of the study area and the resolution of the imagery, transects were generated at 100 m intervals and extended to a length of 2000 m. As a result, a total of 1736 transects intersecting the coastline were obtained; their spatial distribution is further detailed in the DSAS index analysis. The Net Shoreline Movement (NSM), End Point Rate (EPR), Weighted Linear Regression Rate (WLR) and Shoreline Change Envelope (SCE) were used to evaluate the shoreline dynamics in the study area. NSM represents the distance between the oldest and the most recent coastlines, thereby quantifying overall coastline change. EPR indicates the rate and direction of coastline movement [37]. WLR—an extension of the Linear Regression Rate (LRR)—determines the best-fit line that characterizes the coastline trend [38]. SCE is defined as the maximum distance between all coastlines intersecting a transect. For a detailed description of the DSAS metrics, see the DSAS Version 5.0 User Guide (https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20181179 (accessed on 5 February 2025)).

2.5.3. Gray Correlation Analysis

Gray correlation analysis quantifies the degree of association between variables by examining the similarity of their trend curves (i.e., the more similar the trends, the higher the correlation). This method is particularly suitable for small sample sizes and data that do not conform to a normal distribution. The analysis proceeds through the following steps [39]:
Step 1: Mean normalization
x i k = x i k 1 n k = 1 n x i k ,
where x i k represent the normalized value of the ith variable in year k. Each raw data series is normalized to remove dimensional effects.
Step 2: Calculation of absolute differences
a =   m i n i m i n k Δ i k ,
b = m a x i m a x k Δ i k ,
where a and b are the minimum and maximum difference between the ith variable and the length of the study area coastline in year k, respectively. Δik is the absolute difference between the ith variable and the length of the study area coastline in year k.
Step 3: Calculation of correlation coefficient
y i k = a + ρ b Δ i k + ρ b ,
where y i k denotes the correlation coefficient of the ith variable with the length of the coastline of the study area in year k, and ρ is the discrimination coefficient, which usually takes the value of 0.5.
Step 4: Gray correlation calculation
Y = 1 n k = 1 n y i k ,
where Y denotes the average correlation coefficient between the ith variable and the length of the coastline in the study area over k years.

3. Results

3.1. Spatial–Temporal Change in Coastline

Figure 2 illustrates the dynamic evolution of the coastline in the study area from 1987 to 2022. Significant spatiotemporal changes were observed over the study period. In 1987, the total coastline length was 761.50 km, comprising 184.63 km (24.24%) of natural coastlines and 103.91 km (13.64%) of artificial coastlines. Among the natural segments, bedrock coastlines dominated, accounting for 83.49% (154.32 km) of the natural coastline, while aquaculture dikes constituted the major component (67.13%, 69.71 km) of the artificial coastline. By 1997, the overall coastline length had increased to 768.62 km; however, the natural coastline decreased to 118.62 km (15.43%), whereas the artificial coastline expanded to 202.27 km (26.31%). Within the natural category, bedrock coastlines continued to predominate (88.67%, 105.23 km). In contrast, the composition of the artificial coastline shifted, with artificial construction becoming the dominant component (62.20%, 125.82 km). In 2007, the total coastline slightly decreased to 750.50 km. Natural coastlines further declined to 107.80 km (14.36%), maintaining bedrock as the primary type (84.00%, 90.55 km), while the artificial coastline exhibited substantial growth, reaching 270.52 km (36.05%), of which artificial construction accounted for 54.54% (147.57 km). By 2017, the total coastline had expanded to 785.15 km—an overall increase of approximately 5.00% since 1987. During this period, natural coastlines experienced a marked reduction to 91.85 km (11.70%), with bedrock coastlines notably declining by 69.39%. Conversely, the artificial coastline surged to 277.89 km (35.39%), with artificial construction comprising 66.53% (184.72 km) of this total. In 2022, the total coastline reached 798.91 km. Natural coastlines were reduced further to 94.81 km (11.87%), reflecting an overall decline of 48.64% since 1987; bedrock coastlines suffered a particularly severe reduction (−69.39%), while biological coastlines paradoxically increased by 158.82%. In contrast, artificial coastlines grew markedly (147.62%), with artificial construction exhibiting an extraordinary rise of 466.73%. Notably, the aquaculture dikes showed an initial increase followed by a subsequent decline over the study period. Spatial analysis revealed a pattern of natural coastline retreat concurrent with artificial coastline expansion, predominantly concentrated in the central and southern regions of the study area (Figure 3). The spatial overlap strongly shows that intensive human activities are the primary driver of coastal transformation, with significant ecological implications arising from the accelerated loss of natural habitats and the proliferation of anthropogenic infrastructure.

3.2. Dynamic Changes in Coastline Utilization and Location

The dynamic evolution of coastline utilization within the study area reveals distinct temporal patterns (Figure 4). ICTD exhibited a notable increase between 1987 and 2007, followed by a significant decline from 2007 to 2022. This temporal trend reflects the trans-formation in the proportional distribution of coastline types over time. During the 1987–2007 period, the proportions of major coastline categories—such as bedrock coastlines (ranging from 83.49% to 88.67% of natural coastlines), artificial construction coastlines (rising from 54.54% to 67.13% of artificial coastlines), and aquaculture dikes (from 62.20% to 75.22%)—exhibited only modest fluctuations. These relatively stable proportions contributed to a higher diversity of coastline types. However, post-2007, substantial structural changes occurred. Bedrock coastlines experienced a sharp decline, decreasing by 69.39% by 2022, while aquaculture dike coastlines also significantly contracted. In contrast, artificial construction coastlines expanded dramatically, with an increase of 466.73%. This rapid expansion of a single artificial type led to a reduction in the overall diversity of coastline types, resulting in the observed decline in ICTD. Simultaneously, ICUD exhibited a steady upward trend, increasing at an average rate of 1.97 units per year from 1987 to 2022. This continuous rise indicates a growing intensity of anthropogenic intervention and utilization along the coastline. The opposite trend of ICTD and ICUD reflects that the coastal development in the study area has shifted from relative balance to increasingly intensive utilization dominated by anthropogenic in the past 35 years.
The DSAS analysis results for the study area from 1987 to 2022, as illustrated in Figure 5, revealed pronounced spatiotemporal changes in the coastline. EPR analysis indicated an average coastline change rate of 8.09 ± 0.01 m/yr, with 26.27% of transects exhibiting statistically significant erosion (mean rate: −7.32 m/yr) and 72.69% showing statistically significant accretion (mean rate: 13.64 m/yr). These results reflect a prevailing trend of coastline progradation over the study period. WLR analysis indicated a slightly lower average rate of 6.62 ± 3.34 m/yr. Among all transects, 26.04% were classified as erosional (only 5.23% statistically significant, with an average rate of −3.29 m/yr) and 73.96% as accretional (of which 13.83% were statistically significant, averaging 10.10 m/yr). These findings further support the general trend of coastline advancement, though localized erosional processes persist. SCE represents the maximum displacement among all observed coastlines at each transect, averaged 331.42 m, ranging from 0.65 m to 1001.95 m, reflecting the spatial heterogeneity of coastline responses across the study area. NSM represents the linear distance between the earliest and most recent coastlines, recording an average change of 224.32 m. Notably, 26.48% of transects showed negative displacement, with a maximum retreat of −859.40 m and an average of −111.68 m, whereas 73.52% of transects experienced positive displacement, with a maximum advancement of 1001.54 m and an average of 345.33 m. Spatially, the most pronounced EPR reductions were concentrated in the eastern region, while localized areas in the south exhibited the highest accretion rates. The spatial patterns of WLR, SCE, and NSM closely aligned with those observed in the EPR analysis, reinforcing the consistency of regional coastline dynamics across multiple indicators.

3.3. Influencing Factors of Spatial–Temporal Change in Coastline

The results of the gray relational analysis revealed that the highest gray relational coefficients with natural coastline were associated with MF (0.85), MAT (0.83), and AP (0.81), followed by PRP (0.65), AA (0.65), Nb (0.65), QL (0.61), and APO (0.61). The lowest coefficients were observed for GDP (0.49) and Ex (0.47), both below the critical threshold of 0.5, indicating weak correlations (Figure 6). In contrast, the highest gray relational coefficients with artificial coastline were observed for Ex (0.64), PT (0.63), TFT (0.61), and GDP (0.60). Coefficients below 0.5 were recorded for PRP (0.49), MF (0.49), MAT (0.49), AA (0.47), and Nb (0.46). Regarding the total coastline, the strongest associations were observed with MAT (0.98) and AP (0.85), while Ex (0.46) was the only factor with a coefficient below 0.5. Overall, climatic variables (specifically MAT and AP) demonstrated the strongest associations with natural coastline changes, whereas economic development indicators such as GDP, TFT, and Ex showed the strongest correlations with artificial coastline dynamics. Further regression analysis revealed that MF and Nb were significantly associated with natural coastlines (Figure 7). Specifically, MF exhibited a significant positive correlation (slope = 1.05, p = 0.01), whereas Nb showed a significant negative correlation (slope = −1.03, p = 0.002). Regarding the artificial coastline, MF, TFT, AA, and Nb all displayed statistically significant correlations. Among these, MF had a significant negative correlation (slope = −1.03, p = 0.03), while TFT, AA, and Nb showed significant positive correlations. No variables were found to be significantly correlated with the total coastline length. However, Nb exhibited an especially strong relationship with coastline change, demonstrating an inverse association with natural coastline and a direct association with artificial coastline. This suggests that anthropogenic activities was the most influential factor driving changes in coastline length.
Similar conclusions can be drawn from typical regional coastline changes. In the southwestern part of the study area, Gaolan Island exhibited a clear trend of seaward expansion from 1987 to 1997, during which road infrastructure connecting the island to the mainland was completed (Figure 8). This expansion trend weakened between 1997 and 2007, although land reclamation began in the northern part of Gaolan Island in 2003, accompanied by the initiation of engineering construction on its western side. By 2022, land enclosure in the northern region had been completed, and construction activities had extended to the western and southern sections connected to the mainland, eventually forming a port. As of 2022, the northern part of the island was fully reclaimed, with ongoing infrastructure development in the west and south, contributing to continued westward expansion of the harbor. Hengqin Island, located in the southern portion of the study area, experienced particularly significant seaward expansion during the 1987–1997 period (Figure 9). The eastern islands underwent widespread outward growth due to polder farming and the development of coastline engineering projects. These efforts resulted in the enclosure of the original natural coastline and the creation of new artificial coastline, leading to a substantial increase in coastal zone area. Consequently, the proportion of artificial coastline steadily approached that of natural coastline. Between 1997 and 2007, this expansion trend diminished, with reclamation and aquaculture mainly concentrated in the Nanwan and Jinwan areas. After 2007, the rate of coastline expansion further declined compared to the previous periods. Expansion became primarily driven by engineering construction projects, while the contribution from reclamation and aquaculture decreased.

4. Discussion

The coastline of Zhuhai has undergone marked spatiotemporal changes from 1987 to 2022, characterized by a dominant trend of artificial coastline expansion and natural coastline retreat. DSAS analysis revealed a prevailing accretional trend, particularly in the southern parts of Zhuhai, such as Gaolan and Hengqin Islands, where extensive land reclamation and coastal infrastructure construction have been concentrated. The average EPR reached 8.09 ± 0.01 m/yr, suggesting strong anthropogenic influence over natural geomorphic processes. In the early period (1987–1997), infrastructure development such as road construction and initial reclamation projects marked the beginning of rapid coastline advancement. Between 1997 and 2007, land enclosure expanded northward and westward in Gaolan Island, while large-scale polder farming and coastline engineering in Hengqin significantly altered the coastline configuration. After 2007, the pace of expansion slowed, replaced by more localized engineering projects. This change aligns with observations in other rapidly urbanizing Chinese coastal cities. Han et al. (2023) found similar patterns of morphological change driven by anthropogenic activity in estuarine environments [40]. Li and Dong (2023) documented phased and spatially uneven ecological transformations in the Pearl River Delta, closely tied to urban development intensity [41]. While the morphological gain from artificial coastline construction supports urban growth and port development, it has also led to a marked reduction in ICTD and ICUD, signaling a shift from balanced land–sea interaction to anthropogenic coastal systems.
The coastal transformation in Zhuhai is shaped by both climatic variables and socio-economic development. Gray relational analysis revealed that natural coastline change was most strongly associated with climate factors, particularly mean annual temperature (MAT, 0.83) and annual precipitation (AP, 0.81). These results suggest that hydroclimatic dynamics affect natural coastline morphology through influencing runoff, erosion, and sedimentation, although their influence is increasingly overshadowed by anthropogenic activity. In contrast, artificial coastlines showed strong correlations with economic indicators such as Ex, PT and TFT, which are closely tied to infrastructure expansion. Regression analysis also highlighted the number of berths (Nb) as a key indicator: negatively correlated with natural coastlines (p = 0.002) and positively with artificial coastlines (p = 0.01), consistent with the narrative of land use transformation. These findings reinforce prior studies on the role of economic growth in coastal change. Han et al. (2023) emphasized how anthropogenic activities have restructured estuarine geomorphology [40]. Li and Dong (2023) identified GDP-driven expansion as a primary contributor to ecological decline in urban coastal zones [41]. In Zhuhai, the shift from natural to engineered coastlines reflects broader national trends, but also suggests an urgent need to balance development with ecological resilience.
However, this study operates within medium-resolution remote sensing data. Firstly, Landsat imagery was established as the robust tool for regional coastline monitoring, imposes inherent limitations on the detection of sub-pixel features such as narrow beach berms or minor scarps [14,42,43]. In addition, the observed reduction in rocky coastline and the variability of biological coasts (including aquaculture areas) likely reflect both human and natural drivers. Reduced riverine sediment supply caused by upstream water diversion and intensive agriculture, together with port construction and other engineering works, can prevent estuarine replenishment of adjacent beaches and alter local hydrodynamics. Enhanced wave attack on exposed promontories and typhoon-driven storm surge also contribute to shoreline change. Disentangling these influences requires higher-resolution imagery, in situ sediment and hydrodynamic measurements, and explicit mapping of aquaculture and reclamation activities; future work should integrate these data with tidal and wave records to better separate anthropogenic from natural controls.
To ensure sustainable coastal development in Zhuhai, it is essential to address the growing tension between economic expansion and environmental conservation. Based on the identified trends and driving mechanisms, several recommendations are proposed. Firstly, coastal ecological zoning should be strengthened to protect remaining natural coastline types, particularly bedrock and biological coastlines that serve vital ecological functions [44]. Designating conservation zones can help prevent irreversible habitat loss caused by unchecked urban encroachment. Secondly, the city should adopt an Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) framework to coordinate land use planning, engineering development, and ecological protection. The integration of nature-based solutions such as mangrove restoration and green buffer zones alongside necessary gray infrastructure has proven effective in enhancing coastal resilience [45]. Thirdly, a long-term dynamic monitoring system should be implemented using remote sensing and coastline analysis tools (e.g., DSAS) to detect early warning signs of erosion, coastline degradation, or ecological decline. Recent studies recommend coupling remote sensing data with hydrodynamic models for improved decision-making. Finally, stakeholder participation and policy coordination between municipal departments, developers, and local communities are crucial. Public awareness campaigns and transparent coastline usage regulations can increase compliance and foster a shared responsibility for coastal stewardship.

5. Conclusions

This study reveals that anthropogenic drivers dominate coastline evolution in rapidly urbanizing coastal zones, with implications for global deltaic and bay cities. Analysis of Zhuhai (1987–2022) demonstrates that land reclamation and infrastructure development drove extensive coastline accretion, particularly in southern areas like Hengqin and Gaolan Islands. Crucially, economic forces (GDP, Ex, TFT) outweighed climatic factors (MAT, AP) in steering artificial coastline changes, while Nb correlations confirm port development as a primary morphological driver. These findings highlight a global-scale paradigm: where coastal urbanization intensifies, economic priorities systematically override natural dynamics. The irreversible transition from natural to anthropogenic coastlines underscores an urgent need for strategic balancing of development and ecological resilience—a critical challenge for coastal cities worldwide.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.M., H.L. and F.Z.; methodology, T.M.; software, H.L.; validation, T.M., H.L. and F.Z.; formal analysis, Y.S., Y.Z. and X.F.; investigation, H.L. and F.Z.; resources, F.Z.; data curation, F.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, T.M., H.L. and F.Z.; writing—review and editing, T.M., H.L. and F.Z.; visualization, Y.S., Y.Z. and X.F.; supervision, T.M. and F.Z.; project administration, F.Z.; funding acquisition, T.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Plateau Ecology and Agriculture, Qinghai University, grant number 2024-ZZ-07.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
GDPGross Domestic Product
FtovThe total output value of fishery
PRPPermanent Residents Population
MFMobile Fishermen
TFTTurnover of Foreign Trade
ElElectricity of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery
ExExpenditures in local government general public budgets/Agriculture, forestry and water affairs
APOAquatic Product Output
AAAquaculture Area
PTPort Throughput
QLQuay Length
NbNumber of Berths in Main Ports
APAnnual Precipitation
MATMean Annual Temperature

References

  1. Luo, Y.; Han, G.; Qin, W.; Chen, L.; Gao, Z. Eco-Environment and Sustainable Management in the Coastal Zone; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  2. Liu, L.; Xu, W.; Yue, Q.; Teng, X.; Hu, H. Problems and countermeasures of coastline protection and utilization in China. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2018, 153, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hou, X.; Wu, T.; Hou, W.; Chen, J.; Wang, Y.; Yu, L. Characteristics of coastline changes in mainland China since the early 1940s. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2016, 59, 1791–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Boye, C.; Appeaning Addo, K.; Wiafe, G.; Dzigbodi-Adjimah, K. Spatio-temporal analyses of shoreline change in the Western Region of Ghana. J. Coast. Conserv. 2018, 22, 769–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Primavera, J.H. Overcoming the impacts of aquaculture on the coastal zone. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2006, 49, 531–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ren, C.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Chen, L.; Xi, Y.; Xiao, X.; Doughty, R.B.; Liu, M.; Jia, M. Rapid expansion of coastal aquaculture ponds in China from Landsat observations during 1984–2016. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2019, 82, 101902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Celata, F.; Gioia, E. Resist or retreat? Beach erosion and the climate crisis in Italy: Scenarios, impacts and challenges. Appl. Geogr. 2024, 169, 103335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, K.; Zhang, L.; Chen, B.; Zuo, J.; Yang, F.; Li, L. Analysis of China’s coastline changes during 1990–2020. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liang, L.; Liu, Q.; Liu, G.; Li, X.; Huang, C. Review of coastline extraction methods based on remote sensing images. J. Geo-Inf. Sci. 2018, 20, 1745–1755. [Google Scholar]
  10. Toure, S.; Diop, O.; Kpalma, K.; Maiga, A.S. Shoreline detection using optical remote sensing: A review. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2019, 8, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ohenhen, L.O.; Shirzaei, M.; Ojha, C.; Sherpa, S.F.; Nicholls, R. Disappearing cities on US coasts. Nat. Commun. 2024, 627, 108–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sunny, D.S.; Islam, K.A.; Mullick, M.R.A.; Ellis, J.T. Performance study of imageries from MODIS, Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2 on measuring shoreline change at a regional scale. Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ. 2022, 28, 100816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rostami, E.; Sharifi, M.; Hasanlou, M. Shoreline extraction using time series of sentinel-2 Satellite images by google earth engine platform. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2023, 10, 653–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zuo, J.; Zhang, L.; Xiao, J.; Chen, B.; Zhang, B.; Hu, Y.; Mamun, M.A.A.; Wang, Y.; Li, K. GCL_FCS30: A global coastline dataset with 30-m resolution and a fine classification system from 2010 to 2020. Sci. Data 2025, 12, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, N.; Li, Y. Fully automatic training sample collection for detecting multi-decadal inland/seaward urban sprawl. Remote Sens. Environ. 2023, 298, 113801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, H. Research on Land Use Spatial-time Evolution Based on Geographical Conditions Monitoring in Development Zone. Geomat. Spat. Inf. Technol. 2018, 41, 151–159. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lin, J.; Tang, D.; Gao, Y.; Li, X. Remote Sensing of the Classification, Development and Utilization of Coastline in Zhuhai City. Ocean. Dev. Manag. 2019, 36, 69–73, 93. [Google Scholar]
  18. Yang, L.; Sun, W.; Ma, Y.; Ren, G. Remote Sensing Analyses of the Spatial and Temporal Changes in Zhuhai Shoreline. Mar. Sci. 2017, 41, 20–28. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhang, H. Monitoring of Coastline Change in Zhuhai Based on High Resolution Remote Sensing. Bull. Surv. Mapp. 2016, 11, 55–59, 71. [Google Scholar]
  20. Yin, N.; Tang, J.; Yang, Y.; Gao, X.; Song, S.; Hu, Q. Variations of shoreline and land use in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area from 1989 to 2021. Mar. Geol. Front. 2023, 39, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  21. Huang, Z.; Fang, L.; Wen, H.; Zhang, K.; Wang, X.; Chen, T. Responses of Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins (Sousa chinensis) to construction of the Hong Kong–Zhuhai–Macao Bridge. Front. Mar. Sci. 2024, 11, 1407937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hu, R.; Yao, L.; Yu, J.; Chen, P.; Wang, D. Remote sensing of the coastline variation of the guangdong–hongkong–macao greater bay area in the past four decades. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2021, 9, 1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Almar, R.; Boucharel, J.; Graffin, M.; Abessolo, G.O.; Thoumyre, G.; Papa, F.; Ranasinghe, R.; Montano, J.; Bergsma, E.W.; Baba, M.W. Influence of El Niño on the variability of global shoreline position. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 3133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, Y.; Li, D.; Fan, C.; Xu, H.; Hou, X. Southeast Asia island coastline changes and driving forces from 1990 to 2015. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2021, 215, 105967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Amrouni, O.; Hzami, A.; Heggy, E. Photogrammetric assessment of shoreline retreat in North Africa: Anthropogenic and natural drivers. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2019, 157, 73–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lansu, E.M.; Reijers, V.C.; Höfer, S.; Luijendijk, A.; Rietkerk, M.; Wassen, M.J.; Lammerts, E.J.; van der Heide, T. A global analysis of how human infrastructure squeezes sandy coasts. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, G.; Huang, K.; Zhu, L.; Sun, W.; Chen, C.; Meng, X.; Wang, L.; Ge, Y. Spatio-temporal changes in China’s mainland shorelines over 30 years using Landsat time series data (1990–2019). Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss. 2024, 2024, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, T.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, K.; Fu, Q. Dynamic changes of the Huizhou Coastline in nearly 50 years based on Landsat images and DSAS. Natl. Remote Sens. Bull. 2024, 28, 689–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ai, B.; Lai, Z.; Zeng, J.; Jian, Z.; Zhao, J.; Sun, S. Detection of wetland degradation and restoration in urbanizing Zhuhai City based on google earth engine. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2025, 261, 107518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zeng, Z.; Lai, C.; Wang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Chen, X. Future sea level rise exacerbates compound floods induced by rainstorm and storm tide during super typhoon events: A case study from Zhuhai, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 911, 168799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhu, L.; Huang, Y.; Yang, G.; Sun, W.; Chen, C.; Huang, K. Information extraction and spatio-temporal evolution analysis of the coastline in Hangzhou Bay based on Google Earth Engine and remote sensing technology. Remote Sens. Nat. Resour. 2023, 35, 50–60. [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang, J.; Wu, Z.; Li, S.; Wang, S.; Zhang, X.; Gao, Q. Coastline and Land Use Change Detection and Analysis with Remote Sensing in the Pearl River Estuary Gulf. Sci. Geogr. Sin. 2016, 36, 1903–1911. [Google Scholar]
  33. Wu, T. Analysis of Spatio-Temporal Characteristics of Mainland Coastline Changes in China in Nearly 70 Years. Ph.D. Thesis, Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yantai, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wu, T.; Hou, X.; Xu, X. Spatio-temporal characteristics of the mainland coastline utilization degree over the last 70 years in China. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2014, 98, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yang, F.; Zhang, L.; Chen, B.; Li, K.; Liao, J.; Mahmood, R.; Hasan, M.E.; Mamun, M.A.A.; Raza, S.A.; Sutrisno, D. Long-term change of coastline length along selected coastal countries of Eurasia and African continents. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 2344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ning, Z.; Jiang, C.; Chen, J.; Wu, Z.; Yao, Z.; Ma, Y.; Deng, T.; Chen, Y. Long-term spatiotemporal analysis of coastline morphological evolutions and their underlying mechanisms in the Pearl River Delta region of China. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2024, 258, 107426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Crowell, M.; Honeycutt, M.; Hatheway, D. Coastal erosion hazards study: Phase one mapping. J. Coast. Res. 1999, 10–20. [Google Scholar]
  38. Keyes, T.K. Applied regression analysis and multivariable methods. Technometrics 2001, 43, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Deng, J. Introduction to grey systems theory. J. Grey Syst. 1989, 1, 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  40. Han, Z.; Wang, H.; Xie, H.; Li, H.; Li, W. How Does Human Activity Shape the Largest Estuarine Bay of the Pearl River Estuary, South China (1964–2019). Water 2023, 15, 4143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, T.; Dong, Y. Phased and polarized development of ecological quality in the rapidly-urbanized Pearl River Delta, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 36176–36189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cai, H.; Li, C.; Luan, X.; Ai, B.; Yan, L.; Wen, Z. Analysis of the spatiotemporal evolution of the coastline of Jiaozhou Bay and its driving factors. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2022, 226, 106246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, Y.; Feng, J.; Cheng, Q.; Tsou, J.Y.; Huang, B.; Ji, C.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Y. Investigating spatiotemporal coastline changes and impacts on coastal zone management: A case study in Pearl River Estuary and Hong Kong’s coast. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2024, 257, 107354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Barbier, E.B.; Hacker, S.D.; Kennedy, C.; Koch, E.W.; Stier, A.C.; Silliman, B.R. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol. Monogr. 2011, 81, 169–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Temmerman, S.; Meire, P.; Bouma, T.J.; Herman, P.M.; Ysebaert, T.; De Vriend, H.J. Ecosystem-based coastal defence in the face of global change. Nature 2013, 504, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The geographic location of study area.
Figure 1. The geographic location of study area.
Water 17 02569 g001
Figure 2. Change trend of coastline length in the study area from 1987 to 2022.
Figure 2. Change trend of coastline length in the study area from 1987 to 2022.
Water 17 02569 g002
Figure 3. Spatial distribution of coastline in the study area from 1987 to 2022.
Figure 3. Spatial distribution of coastline in the study area from 1987 to 2022.
Water 17 02569 g003
Figure 4. Change trend of ICTD and ICUD in the study area from 1987 to 2022.
Figure 4. Change trend of ICTD and ICUD in the study area from 1987 to 2022.
Water 17 02569 g004
Figure 5. Spatial change trend of ICTD and ICUD in the study area from 1987 to 2022. (a) End Point Rate; (b) Weighted Linear Regression; (c) Shoreline Change Envelope; (d) Net Shoreline Movement.
Figure 5. Spatial change trend of ICTD and ICUD in the study area from 1987 to 2022. (a) End Point Rate; (b) Weighted Linear Regression; (c) Shoreline Change Envelope; (d) Net Shoreline Movement.
Water 17 02569 g005
Figure 6. Gray correlation coefficients of different influencing factors in the study area from 1987 to 2022.
Figure 6. Gray correlation coefficients of different influencing factors in the study area from 1987 to 2022.
Water 17 02569 g006
Figure 7. Linear regression of coastline and different influencing factors in the study area.
Figure 7. Linear regression of coastline and different influencing factors in the study area.
Water 17 02569 g007
Figure 8. Spatial change in coastline in Gaolan region from 1987 to 2022. (a) Change from 1987 to 1997; (b) Change from 1997 to 2007; (c) Change from 2007 to 2022.
Figure 8. Spatial change in coastline in Gaolan region from 1987 to 2022. (a) Change from 1987 to 1997; (b) Change from 1997 to 2007; (c) Change from 2007 to 2022.
Water 17 02569 g008
Figure 9. Spatial change in coastline in Hengqin region from 1987 to 2022. (a) Change from 1987 to 1997; (b) Change from 1997 to 2007; (c) Change from 2007 to 2022.
Figure 9. Spatial change in coastline in Hengqin region from 1987 to 2022. (a) Change from 1987 to 1997; (b) Change from 1997 to 2007; (c) Change from 2007 to 2022.
Water 17 02569 g009
Table 1. Remote sensing information used in the study area.
Table 1. Remote sensing information used in the study area.
No.Remote Sensing Data TypeTime
1Landsat5 TM8 December 1987
2Landsat5 TM1 November 1997
3Landsat5 TM29 January 2007
4Landsat7 ETM18 December 2017
5GF-2, GF-73 February 2022
Table 2. Coastline classification system description in the study area.
Table 2. Coastline classification system description in the study area.
CategoryClassDescriptionImage Example
NaturalBedrockBedrock coastlines typically follow the water’s edge line as the shoreline reference, which is often irregular and jagged due to the resistance of exposed rock formations. On remote sensing imagery, the bedrock appears light-toned with striping patterns, and the shores are frequently dotted with reefs, boulders, sea cliffs, and other erosional landforms.Water 17 02569 i001
SandySandy coastlines are typically delineated using the upper beach ridge line or the vegetation line as the shoreline reference. They exhibit a smoother water’s edge line; bright white, uniform hue in areas not reached by the tide, and a darker hue in areas wetted by the tide. Beaches often show striping patterns on remote sensing imagery.Water 17 02569 i002
BiologicalBiological coastline is a special kind of coastal space formed by the special development of a certain kind of organism. Among the types of biological coastlines visible in Zhuhai City, mangrove coastlines are generally mangrove forests, which are distributed in numerous independent patches in the intertidal zone and are dark green in true-color images and red in false-color images.Water 17 02569 i003
ArtificialIndustrial Industrial: Coastline used for waterfront industries for port construction development.Water 17 02569 i004
Port
Terminal
Coastline means coastline used for the construction of port terminals, including coastline used for piers, jetties, and other construction function uses.Water 17 02569 i005
RoadCoastline used to connect land-linked islands, generally straight in shape.Water 17 02569 i006
BreedingBreeding generally refers to the use of aquaculture, fisheries production pond dike coastline, generally located in estuaries, shallow, fish ponds around the perimeter, mostly regular block target.Water 17 02569 i007
Island The water–land boundary of atoll far from land or an island.Water 17 02569 i008
Table 3. Influence weight of anthropogenic activities on coastlines.
Table 3. Influence weight of anthropogenic activities on coastlines.
ClassIslandBedrockSandyBiologicalArtificialBreeding
Weight112344
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, T.; Li, H.; She, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Feng, X.; Zhang, F. Spatial–Temporal Change and Dominant Factors of Coastline in Zhuhai City from 1987 to 2022. Water 2025, 17, 2569. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17172569

AMA Style

Ma T, Li H, She Y, Zhao Y, Feng X, Zhang F. Spatial–Temporal Change and Dominant Factors of Coastline in Zhuhai City from 1987 to 2022. Water. 2025; 17(17):2569. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17172569

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Tao, Haolin Li, Yandi She, Yuanyuan Zhao, Xueke Feng, and Feng Zhang. 2025. "Spatial–Temporal Change and Dominant Factors of Coastline in Zhuhai City from 1987 to 2022" Water 17, no. 17: 2569. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17172569

APA Style

Ma, T., Li, H., She, Y., Zhao, Y., Feng, X., & Zhang, F. (2025). Spatial–Temporal Change and Dominant Factors of Coastline in Zhuhai City from 1987 to 2022. Water, 17(17), 2569. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17172569

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop