Next Article in Journal
Global Drivers of Algal Bloom Occurrence: The Role of Climate, Hydrology, and Morphometry
Previous Article in Journal
Integrating Multiple Levee-Breaching Scenarios and Flood Events to Develop a Probabilistic Spatial Flood-Hazard Map of Etobicoke Creek in Toronto, Canada
Previous Article in Special Issue
Experimental Study on Impedance Spectrum-Based Detection of Water Holdup in Two-Phase Flow under Complex Salinity Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Quantifying Groundwater Flow and Solute Transport Processes Through Modelling and Experiments

1
Department of Geodynamics, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
2
Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management (MINA), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), 1430 Ås, Norway
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2024, 16(24), 3623; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16243623
Submission received: 20 November 2024 / Accepted: 11 December 2024 / Published: 16 December 2024

Summary Editorial

Groundwater is a vital source of water for drinking, irrigation, industrial use, and ecosystem maintenance. Climate conditions determine the amount of renewable water resources, but the significant storage potential of aquifers is key for their use in dry areas, when surface water sources are polluted, or when aiming for better water quality. Even if the water stored in aquifers is essential for life and human activities, its study remains challenging due to our inability to see what is underground, in contrast to surface water, where water processes are visible [1]. To explore underground structures, indirect techniques are frequently used, while direct access through the drilling of boreholes remains a noncontinuous and expensive alternative. The challenge of obtaining accurate data on aquifer properties stems from their inherent heterogeneity, with variations occurring over short distances, complicating analysis and interpretation [2]. This challenge is exacerbated when considering the movement of solutes, as the groundwater quality is affected both by natural conditions and human activities at multiple scales. Sources of diffuse pollution such as agriculture or atmospheric deposition or point sources like landfills, airports, mining, and industry can degrade the quality of groundwater and limit its use. Mitigation techniques require detailed knowledge of the processes and contaminant plume distribution to address or prevent future problems.
The quantification of groundwater flow and the study of contamination and solute transport is frequently linked to the development of models to reproduce flow and aquifer conditions. In the context of global change, numerical modelling techniques with a realistic representation of the subsurface are highly relevant, because they allow for the prediction of future conditions under different scenarios. The exponential growth in computer power combined with the increased user-friendliness of groundwater models has facilitated the use of models [3]. However, numerous challenges remain, from input data availability, the integration of different models, uncertainty of obtained results, and the reproducibility and applicability for end-users. In the case of transport simulation, understanding how the specific chemicals and contaminants behave in a certain environment (degraded, adsorbed, etc.) requires detailed knowledge of the aquifer properties, water chemistry, and solid phases.
A conceptual understanding of how a hydrogeological system works is necessary to feed models. Often, this relies on experiments that can range from the field to lab-scale. New and emerging methods for providing additional or novel information are welcomed to complement and improve the current knowledge about aquifer systems when applying groundwater models. Examples of methods for characterizing and monitoring subsurface properties and processes include hydro-geophysics [4,5], improved well logging techniques [6], and field and lab tests [7]. Hence, subsurface heterogeneity can more easily be implemented in standard groundwater modelling software, which together with parameter estimation tools provide more realistic pictures of transport in groundwater systems. Another emerging technique is the analysis of microbes in aquifers, which provides a totally new perspective on the interaction between the realms of geology and biology [8]. The use of temperature as a tracer is now a frequently used tool for understanding hydrogeological functioning, but still, its application in new settings provides additional perspectives and is a complementary source of information for reducing the uncertainties in aquifer knowledge [9].
With all these improvements, are we able to provide better advice to practitioners on how to deal with groundwater and contaminant issues? The range of water and solute travel times from a few months to hundreds of thousands of years reflects different climate conditions and the complex impact of human activities. Identifying the origin and fate of contaminants requires extensive field campaigns that can later be simulated with numerical models. The choice of conceptual model is still one of the most important steps of modelling, leading to the question of how to establish that these initial simplifications are the best. Despite technical advancements in groundwater flow modelling capabilities, the complexity of bio-geochemical reactions often makes it necessary to simplify the flow to a steady-state situation. Moreover, a straightforward task such as revisiting models after some time to assess their accuracy is rarely undertaken. Implementing post-audit models can enhance model design and functionality; however, it is a challenging endeavour that requires updating models that were developed with older methodologies, collecting current data, and securing sufficient time and funding—tasks which are often beyond the scope of typical research projects or contracts.
The need for improved groundwater models, along with the enduring challenges of accessing sufficient data and testing their efficacy, underscores the importance of continuing the development of experimental and alternative methods for researching groundwater systems. While the availability of comprehensive databases and enhanced computational capabilities may obscure the necessity for generating detailed knowledge, the advancement of hydrogeological sciences relies on this continued effort.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: C.D. and H.K.F.; methodology: C.D. and H.K.F.; writing—original draft preparation: C.D. and H.K.F.; writing—review and editing: C.D. and H.K.F.; funding acquisition: C.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research of CD was funded by the Next-Generation EU funding: Programa María Zambrano Sénior, grant number MZSA03, and the grants PID2022-137711OB-I00 funded by MICIU/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033 and “ERDF/EU”, PCM_00018, funded by Consejería de Universidad, Investigación e Innovación and Gobierno de España and Unión Europea – NextGenerationEU and PCI2024-153503 funded by MICIU/AEI /10.13039/501100011033 and the EU. The research of H.K.F. was funded by the Norwegian Research Council, earthresQue grant number 310042.

Data Availability Statement

In this publication, no new data were created.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

List of Contributions

The list of contributions includes publications that had to be changed to standard publications that are not included in this Special Issue for editorial purposes.
  • Kidmose, J.; Troldborg, L.; Refsgaard, J.C. Post Audit of Groundwater Model Predictions under Changing Conditions. Water 2023, 15, 1144. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15061144.
  • del Carmen Vargas-García, M.; Sola, F.; Vallejos, Á. Comparative Study of Microbial Diversity in Different Coastal Aquifers: Determining Factors. Water 2023, 15, 1337. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15071337.
  • French, H.K.; Hansen, M.C.; Moe, K.G.; Stene, J. Modelling Plume Development with Annual Pulses of Contaminants Released from an Airport Runway to a Layered Aquifer, Evaluation of an In Situ Monitoring System. Water 2023, 15, 985. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15050985Linfeng.
  • Jiménez-Valera, J.A.; Alhama, I.; Trigueros, E. Quantification of Groundwater Vertical Flow from Temperature Profiles: Application to Agua Amarga Coastal Aquifer (SE Spain) Submitted to Artificial Recharge. Water 2023, 15, 1093. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15061093.
  • Cheng; Ke, S.; Shi, H.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, H.; Hu, H. Experimental Study on Impedance Spectrum-Based Detection of Water Holdup in Two-Phase Flow under Complex Salinity Conditions. Water 2024, 16, 2047. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16142047.
  • Dallan, E.; Bottacin-Busolin, A.; Zaramella, M.; Marion, A. A Method for Calibrating the Transient Storage Model from the Early and Late-Time Behavior of Breakthrough Curves. Water 2023, 15, 979. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15050979.
  • Calvache, M.L.; López-Chicano, M.; Blanco-Coronas, Á.M.; de la Torre, B.; Duque, C. Applicability of Single-Borehole Dilution Tests in Aquifers with Vertical Flow. Water 2024, 16, 1305. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16091305
  • Skjennum, A.; French, H.K.; Carotenuto, P.; Okkenhaug, G. Combined Column Test for Characterization of Leaching and Transport of Trace Elements in Contaminated Soils. Water 2023, 15, 874. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15050874.

References

  1. Duque, C.; Nilsson, B.; Engesgaard, P. Groundwater-Surface water interaction in Denmark. WIREs Water 2023, 10, e1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ronayne, M.J.; Gorelick, S.M.; Zheng, C. Geological modeling of submeter scale heterogeneity and its influence on tracer transport in a fluvial aquifer. Water Resour. Res. 2010, 46, W10519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Refsgaard, J.C.; Højberg, A.L.; Møller, I.; Hansen, M.; Søndergaard, V. Groundwater Modeling in Integrated Water Resources Management—Visions for 2020. Groundwater 2010, 48, 633–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rubin, Y.; Hubbard, S.S. Hydrogeophysics; Springer Science & Business Media: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  5. Slater, L.; Binley, A. Resistivity and Induced Polarization, Theory and Applications to the Near-Surface Earth; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2020; ISBN -13978-1108492744. [Google Scholar]
  6. Williams, J.H.; Paillet, F.L. Geophysical Logging for Hydrogeology; United States Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2023; 79p, ISBN 978-1-77470-082-2.
  7. Moore, J.E. Field Hydrogeology, A Guide for Site Investigations and Report Preparation; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2002; 191p. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ruiz-González, C.; Rodellas, V.; Garcia-Orellana, J. The microbial dimension of submarine groundwater discharge: Current challenges and future directions. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2021, 45, fuab010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Rau, G.C.; Andersen, M.S.; McCallum, A.M.; Roshan, H.; Acworth, R.I. Heat as a tracer to quantify water flow in near-surface sediments. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2014, 129, 40–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Duque, C.; French, H.K. Quantifying Groundwater Flow and Solute Transport Processes Through Modelling and Experiments. Water 2024, 16, 3623. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16243623

AMA Style

Duque C, French HK. Quantifying Groundwater Flow and Solute Transport Processes Through Modelling and Experiments. Water. 2024; 16(24):3623. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16243623

Chicago/Turabian Style

Duque, Carlos, and Helen K. French. 2024. "Quantifying Groundwater Flow and Solute Transport Processes Through Modelling and Experiments" Water 16, no. 24: 3623. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16243623

APA Style

Duque, C., & French, H. K. (2024). Quantifying Groundwater Flow and Solute Transport Processes Through Modelling and Experiments. Water, 16(24), 3623. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16243623

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop