Priority Setting and Resource Allocation in Coastal Local Government Marine Regulatory Reform: Application of Machine Learning in Resource Optimization
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Research Background and Significance
1.2. Current Status and Challenges of Marine Regulation by Coastal Local Governments
1.3. Application of Machine Learning in Resource Optimization and Task Priority Setting
1.4. Research Objectives and Problem Analysis
2. Literature Review
3. Research Methodology
3.1. Application of Machine Learning in Resource Optimization and Task Priority Setting
- (1)
- Demand for Regulatory Resource Optimization
- (2)
- Application of Machine Learning Algorithms in Resource Optimization
- (3)
- Specific Application Scenarios
- (4)
- Case Studies
3.2. Questionnaire Design and Survey Objects
- (1)
- Qingdao: As one of China’s major marine cities, Qingdao has extensive experience and a unique position in marine resource development and marine environmental protection.
- (2)
- Dalian: Located in Liaoning Province, Dalian boasts abundant marine resources and is a core area for marine economic development in the northeast region.
- (3)
- Xiamen: Situated in Fujian Province along the southeastern coast, Xiamen’s marine economy is a vital pillar industry and a pioneering area for innovation in marine regulation.
3.3. Experimental Design and Model Evaluation
4. Research Findings
4.1. Analysis of Questionnaire Survey Results
4.2. Evaluation of Model Effects in Resource Allocation Plans
5. Discussion
- (1)
- Utilizing alternative data sources: Exploring alternative data sources such as social media data, online news reports, and reports from non-governmental organizations to complement official data shortcomings.
- (2)
- Transfer learning: Employing transfer learning techniques involves utilizing models pre-trained in other domains or regions as a foundation and fine-tuning them to suit local marine regulation requirements.
- (3)
- Ensemble methods: Employing ensemble methods by combining multiple machine learning models enhances model generalization capability and robustness.
- (4)
- Expert knowledge: Integrating expert knowledge and experience through expert systems can aid decision-making in data-scarce scenarios.
- (5)
- Continuous data collection: Establishing mechanisms for ongoing data collection and updates allows for the gradual accumulation of data resources to support model training and optimization.
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
- I.
- Basic Information
- Gender:
- A.
- Male
- B.
- Female
- Age range:
- A.
- 18–30 years old
- B.
- 31–45 years old
- C.
- 46–60 years old
- D.
- 60 years old and above
- Education level:
- A.
- High school and below
- B.
- Bachelor’s degree
- C.
- Master’s degree and above
- II.
- Perception and Evaluation of Marine Regulatory Work
- 4.
- How urgent do you perceive the current marine resource management to be? (Rate from 1 to 5, with 5 indicating extremely urgent)
- A.
- 1
- B.
- 2
- C.
- 3
- D.
- 4
- E.
- 5
- 5.
- How important do you consider the current marine resource management to be? (Rate from 1 to 5, with 5 indicating extremely important)
- A.
- 1
- B.
- 2
- C.
- 3
- D.
- 4
- E.
- 5
- 6.
- Please rank the following marine regulatory tasks in terms of priority:
- A.
- Marine pollution control
- B.
- Fisheries resource management
- C.
- Vessel traffic management
- D.
- Ecological protection area delineation
- 7.
- Which of the above tasks do you believe require additional resource allocation? (Multiple choices allowed)
- A.
- Marine pollution control
- B.
- Fisheries resource management
- C.
- Vessel traffic management
- D.
- Ecological protection area delineation
- III.
- Awareness and Expectations of Machine Learning Technology
- 8.
- How familiar are you with machine learning technology?
- A.
- Completely unfamiliar
- B.
- Somewhat familiar
- C.
- Quite familiar
- 9.
- Are you willing to try using machine learning technology for marine regulatory work?
- A.
- Willing to try
- B.
- Might try
- C.
- Not willing to try
- 10.
- What do you believe are the potential effects of applying machine learning technology in marine regulation? (Multiple choices allowed)
- A.
- Improve regulatory efficiency
- B.
- Enhance prediction accuracy
- C.
- Reduce manpower costs
- D.
- Other (please specify)
- IV.
- Personal Work Background
- 11.
- How many years have you been engaged in marine regulatory work?
- A.
- 0–5 years
- B.
- 5–10 years
- C.
- More than 10 years
- 12.
- What department are you affiliated with?
- A.
- Marine and Fisheries Bureau
- B.
- Maritime Bureau
- C.
- Environmental Protection Bureau
- D.
- Other related departments (please specify)
- V.
- Feedback and Suggestions
- 13.
- What suggestions do you have for improving the current marine regulatory system?
- VI.
- Conclusion
References
- Gonçalves, L.R.; Gerhardinger, L.C.; Polette, M.; Turra, A. An Endless Endeavor: The Evolution and Challenges of Multi-Level Coastal Governance in the Global South. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Zhang, S.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, C.; Dong, X. Risk prediction and credibility detection of network public opinion using blockchain technology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2023, 187, 122177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, S.; Li, J. Do political promotion incentive and fiscal incentive of local governments matter for the marine environmental pollution? Evidence from China’s coastal areas. Mar. Policy 2021, 128, 104505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saengsupavanich, C. Which eroding site is more urgent for the government? A reflection from coastal communities. J. Coast. Conserv. 2020, 24, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bulengela, G. Perception of marine fisheries resources in Tanzania from past to present: Evidence through local knowledge. Marit. Technol. Res. 2024, 6, 267008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Putra, A.; Dewata, I.; Hermon, D.; Barlian, E.; Umar, G. Sustainable development-based coastal management policy development: A literature review. J. Sustain. Sci. Manag. 2023, 18, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, W.; Liu, J.; Ma, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Yu, W.; Chen, B. China’s marine protected area system: Evolution, challenges, and new prospects. Mar. Policy 2020, 115, 103780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Issifu, I.; Sumaila, U.R. A Review of the Production, Recycling and Management of Marine Plastic Pollution. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhu, J. Integration of spatial justice into navigating the combat on illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing in ocean and coastal areas. Front. Mar. Sci. 2024, 11, 1368015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saengsupavanich, C.; Ratnayake, A.S.; Yun, L.S.; Ariffin, E.H. Current challenges in coastal erosion management for southern Asian regions: Examples from Thailand, Malaysia, and Sri Lanka. Anthr. Coasts 2023, 6, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luom, T.T.; Phong, N.T.; Smithers, S.; Van Tai, T. Protected mangrove forests and aquaculture development for livelihoods. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2021, 205, 105553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rocha, C.; Antunes, C.; Catita, C. Coastal indices to assess sea-level rise impacts—A brief review of the last decade. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2023, 237, 106536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Serio, F.; Armenio, E.; Mossa, M.; Petrillo, A.F. How to Define Priorities in Coastal Vulnerability Assessment. Geosciences 2018, 8, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scardino, G.; Miglietta, M.M.; Kushabaha, A.; Casella, E.; Rovere, A.; Besio, G.; Borzì, A.M.; Cannata, A.; Mazza, G.; Sabato, G.; et al. Fingerprinting Mediterranean hurricanes using pre-event thermal drops in seawater temperature. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 8014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lou, R.; Lv, Z.; Dang, S.; Su, T.; Li, X. Application of machine learning in ocean data. Multimed. Syst. 2021, 29, 1815–1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fkun, E. Understanding the Roles and Challenges of Local Government in the Era of Technological Transformation in Indonesia: A Study of Public Policy Literacy. ARISTO 2022, 10, 566–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joshi, A.; Capezza, S.; Alhaji, A.; Chow, M.-Y. Survey on AI and Machine Learning Techniques for Microgrid Energy Management Systems. IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sin. 2023, 10, 1513–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Hu, Z.; Wang, J.; Liu, X.; Shi, Q.; Wang, Y.; Qiao, L.; Li, Y.; Yang, H.; Liu, J.; et al. Deep Learning-Assisted Triboelectric Smart Mats for Personnel Comprehensive Monitoring toward Maritime Safety. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 24832–24839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Scardino, G.; Scicchitano, G.; Chirivì, M.; Costa, P.J.M.; Luparelli, A.; Mastronuzzi, G. Convolutional Neural Network and Optical Flow for the Assessment of Wave and Tide Parameters from Video Analysis (LEUCOTEA): An Innovative Tool for Coastal Monitoring. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 2994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scarrica, V.M.; Aucelli, P.P.C.; Cagnazzo, C.; Casolaro, A.; Fiore, P.; La Salandra, M.; Rizzo, A.; Scardino, G.; Scicchitano, G.; Staiano, A. A novel beach litter analysis system based on UAV images and Convolutional Neural Networks. Ecol. Inform. 2022, 72, 101875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gamage, C.; Dinalankara, R.; Samarabandu, J.; Subasinghe, A. A comprehensive survey on the applications of machine learning techniques on maritime surveillance to detect abnormal maritime vessel behaviors. WMU J. Marit. Aff. 2023, 22, 447–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahrad, B.E.; Newton, A.; Icely, J.; Kacimi, I.; Abalansa, S.; Snoussi, M. Contribution of Remote Sensing Technologies to a Holistic Coastal and Marine Environmental Management Framework: A Review. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 2313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ebrahimi, M.; Nunamaker, J.F.; Chen, H. Semi-Supervised Cyber Threat Identification in Dark Net Markets: A Transductive and Deep Learning Approach. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2020, 37, 694–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Durlik, I.; Miller, T.; Cembrowska-Lech, D.; Krzemińska, A.; Złoczowska, E.; Nowak, A. Navigating the Sea of Data: A Comprehensive Review on Data Analysis in Maritime IoT Applications. Appl. Sci. 2023, 9, 9742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glaviano, F.; Esposito, R.T.; Cosmo, A.d.; Esposito, F.; Gerevini, L.; Ria, A.; Molinara, M.; Bruschi, P.; Costantini, M.; Zupo, V. Management and Sustainable Exploitation of Marine Environments through Smart Monitoring and Automation. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.; Ma, F.; Xu, X.; Chen, Y.; Wang, J. A Novel Ship Collision Avoidance Awareness Approach for Cooperating Ships Using Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2021, 9, 1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.; Zhang, H.; Huang, J.; Zhang, P. The use of alternative fuels for maritime decarbonization: Special marine environmental risks and solutions from an international law perspective. Front. Mar. Sci. 2023, 9, 1082453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, Y.; Jiang, W.Y.; Wang, Z.Y. Economic resilience assessment and policy interaction of coal resource oriented cities for the low carbon economy based on AI. Resour. Policy 2023, 82, 103522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C.; Liang, F.; Liang, Y.; Wang, Z. Low-carbon strategy, entrepreneurial activity, and industrial structure change: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 427, 139183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, D.D.; Guan, X.; Tang, T.T.; Zhao, L.Y.; Tong, W.R.; Wang, Z.Y. The clean energy development path and sustainable development of the ecological environment driven by big data for mining projects. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 348, 119426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, C.; Tang, W.; Liang, F.; Wang, Z. The impact of climate change on corporate ESG performance: The role of resource misallocation in enterprises. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 445, 141263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Guan, X.; Zeng, Y.; Liang, X.; Dong, S. Utilizing data platform management to implement “5W” analysis framework for preventing and controlling corruption in grassroots government. Heliyon 2024, 10, e28601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, J.; Wang, Z. Insight into the nexus between intellectual property pledge financing and enterprise innovation: A systematic analysis with multidimensional perspectives. Int. Rev. Econ. Financ. 2024, 93, 700–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ho, L.T.; Goethals, P.L.M. Machine learning applications in river research: Trends, opportunities and challenges. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2022, 13, 2603–2621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rubbens, P.; Brodie, S.; Cordier, T.; Destro Barcellos, D.; Devos, P.; Fernandes-Salvador, J.A.; Fincham, J.I.; Gomes, A.; Handegard, N.O.; Howell, K.; et al. Machine learning in marine ecology: An overview of techniques and applications. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2023, 80, 1829–1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, S.; Xiong, X.; Wu, X.; Xue, Z. Modeling the SOFC by BP neural network algorithm. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 20065–20077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balki, I.; Amirabadi, A.; Levman, J.; Martel, A.L.; Emersic, Z.; Meden, B.; Garcia-Pedrero, A.; Ramirez, S.C.; Kong, D.; Moody, A.R.; et al. Sample-Size Determination Methodologies for Machine Learning in Medical Imaging Research: A Systematic Review. Can. Assoc. Radiol. J. 2019, 70, 344–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Azizi, S.; Culp, L.; Freyberg, J.; Mustafa, B.; Baur, S.; Kornblith, S.; Chen, T.; Tomasev, N.; Mitrović, J.; Strachan, P.; et al. Robust and data-efficient generalization of self-supervised machine learning for diagnostic imaging. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2023, 7, 756–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Amiri, Z.; Heidari, A.; Navimipour, N.J.; Unal, M.; Mousavi, A. Adventures in data analysis: A systematic review of Deep Learning techniques for pattern recognition in cyber-physical-social systems. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2024, 83, 22909–22973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, Y.; Ahmad, S.F.; Irshad, M.; Al-Razgan, M.; Ali, Y.A.; Awwad, E.M. Impact of Digitalization on Process Optimization and Decision-Making towards Sustainability: The Moderating Role of Environmental Regulation. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Regulatory Task | Urgency Score | Importance Score | Historical Resource Allocation | Predicted Priority Score |
---|---|---|---|---|
Task 1 | 0.8 | 0.9 | Moderate | 0.75 |
Task 2 | 0.7 | 0.8 | High | 0.70 |
Task 3 | 0.9 | 0.7 | Low | 0.65 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Tian, Y.; Wang, Q. Priority Setting and Resource Allocation in Coastal Local Government Marine Regulatory Reform: Application of Machine Learning in Resource Optimization. Water 2024, 16, 1544. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16111544
Tian Y, Wang Q. Priority Setting and Resource Allocation in Coastal Local Government Marine Regulatory Reform: Application of Machine Learning in Resource Optimization. Water. 2024; 16(11):1544. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16111544
Chicago/Turabian StyleTian, Yingying, and Qi Wang. 2024. "Priority Setting and Resource Allocation in Coastal Local Government Marine Regulatory Reform: Application of Machine Learning in Resource Optimization" Water 16, no. 11: 1544. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16111544
APA StyleTian, Y., & Wang, Q. (2024). Priority Setting and Resource Allocation in Coastal Local Government Marine Regulatory Reform: Application of Machine Learning in Resource Optimization. Water, 16(11), 1544. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16111544