Next Article in Journal
Spatial Distribution of Pine Pollen Grains Concentrations as a Source of Biologically Active Substances in Surface Waters of the Southern Baltic Sea
Next Article in Special Issue
The Bacterial Degradation of Lignin—A Review
Previous Article in Journal
A New Cross-Flow Type Turbine for Ultra-Low Head in Streams and Channels
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Role of Oxygenated Functional Groups on Cadmium Removal using Pyrochar and Hydrochar Derived from Guadua angustifolia Residues
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Water
Volume 15
Issue 5
10.3390/w15050974
water-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of Heavy Metal Contamination in Macroalgae from Surface Waters in Djelfa, Algeria

by
Meriem Dehbi
1,
Faouzia Dehbi
1,
Muhammad Imran Kanjal
2,
Hichem Tahraoui
3,
Meriem Zamouche
4,
Abdeltif Amrane
5,
Aymen Amine Assadi
5,6,
Amina Hadadi
7 and
Lotfi Mouni
7,*
1
Laboratory of Physico Chemistry of Materials and Environment, University Ziane Achour of Djelfa, Djelfa 17000, Algeria
2
Department of Chemistry, Government College University, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
3
Laboratory of Biomaterials and Transport Phenomena (LBMPT), Nouveau PôleUrbain, Médéa University, Medea 26000, Algeria
4
Laboratoire de Recherche sur le Médicament et le Développement Durable (ReMeDD), Faculté de Génie des Procédés, Université de Salah Boubnider Constantine 3, Constantine 25000, Algeria
5
Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Rennes, Univ Rennes, CNRS, ISCR-UMR 6226, 35000 Rennes, France
6
College of Engineering, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11432, Saudi Arabia
7
Laboratoire de Gestion et Valorisation des Ressources Naturelles et Assurance Qualité, Faculté SNVST, Université de Bouira, Bouira 10000, Algeria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2023, 15(5), 974; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15050974
Submission received: 6 February 2023 / Revised: 26 February 2023 / Accepted: 1 March 2023 / Published: 3 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Approaches to Nutrients and Pollutants Removal from Wastewaters)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The heavy metals concentration in algae can be used as a bioindicator of the pollution of an ecosystem. In the present study, we determined the levels of the elements Fe, Pb, Cu, and Zn in chlorophyta of the species Cladophora, Spirogyra, Chara, and Zygnema. The samples were collected in February of 2021 in three different locations in Algeria (Dar El Chioukh lake, Oued Mellah, and Oued Boucedira). Our results showed that all four algae species accumulated high levels of heavy metals in surface water, with concentrations ranging from 3.14 to 5600 mg/kg. The Pb levels in all four species exceeded the recommended standard set by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) of 0.574 mg/kg, with the highest concentration of 50.85 mg/kg recorded in Cladophora at the first location. Similarly, Fe and Cu levels were found to be above the recommended standard, with maximum concentrations of 5600 mg/kg and 82.5 mg/kg, respectively. On the other hand, Zn levels were found to be lower than the standard of 128 mg/kg, with the highest concentration of 47.5 mg/kg recorded in Spirogyra at the third location. The results of the principal component analysis (PCA) confirmed that the heavy metal pollution of these waters was of anthropogenic origin, likely stemming from urban, industrial, and agricultural activities.

1. Introduction

Lakes and rivers serve as the principal sources of water for household, industrial, and agricultural operations as a consequence of rapid urbanization and population growth. In many nations, the industrial, manufacturing, and agricultural sectors are the primary contributors to economic growth. These industries’ products emit tons of waste containing metals into the ecosystem [1]. Chromium, cadmium, lead, copper, nickel, and zinc are the most frequent metals detected [2]. This has become a severe environmental issue, causing harmful impacts on flora and animals and even endangering human life. It should also be mentioned that some studies prefer the phrase “potentially toxic elements” to “heavy metals” [3] or propose developing a new categorization for them. We utilized the terminology “heavy metals” or trace metals (TMEs) in our study.
There are heavy metals, such as Fe, Cu, Zn, and Pb, that are essential for the metabolism of living organisms. Their detrimental impact is only detected when the quantity necessary for metabolism implementation is surpassed. Furthermore, among the heavy metals, there are some that are very poisonous and have a harmful impact on living beings even in trace amounts [4].
Different countries are adopting their own limits for heavy metals to prevent the gradual poisoning of land and water, in accordance with World Health Organization recommendations [5]. In order to evaluate the toxicity of metals, the repercussions of their accumulation in ecosystems, and the nature of their influence on living creatures, bioindication and biotesting techniques have become more popular [6]. Bioindication and biotesting involve the use microorganisms, higher plants, animals, and algae [7].
Multiple species coexisting in an ecosystem may give resilience to environmental fluctuation, species stability, the capacity to share metabolites and weather periods of nutrient constraint, and resistance to invasion by other organisms. As a result, photosynthetic microorganisms that are prevalent in the environment and are sensitive to environmental changes may be useful indicators of heavy metals by giving biological reactions when these heavy metals come into contact with them. Algae are a vital component of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems and react rapidly, often preceding higher plants, to external factors, while exhibiting a distinct response to a given anthropogenic cause [8]. It is well known that the responsiveness of algae to metal action is determined by the specific properties of algae species as well as the metals themselves. Heavy metals’ harmful impacts on algae are linked to the development of oxidative stress [9]. It was reported that copper, cadmium, and lead cause lipid peroxidation in cell membranes by attaching to the sulfhydryl of membrane proteins; metal ions such as Zn, Cd, Cu, Hg, Pb, and Ni may substitute the Mg ion in the chlorophyll molecule, hence inhibiting photosynthesis [10]. A change in metabolic pathways is found as a consequence of stress in the cells of algae. An increase in the synthesis of lipids, carbohydrates, and carotenoids by algal cells is indicative of defensive mechanisms that minimize the damage caused by heavy metals [9]. The diverse reaction of algae to the actions of various metals offers several options for their use in assessing the ecological status of ecosystems and determining the toxicity of metals [11].
According to Ramade [12], the development of bio-indication opens the door for broader ecological monitoring that incorporates the impacts on the environment via the use of sentinel species. Moreover, investigations performed directly on water for these kinds of pollutants have a high cost for a random efficacy, but analyzing such pollutants through the bioindicators of accumulation in plants might offer more relevant information at a lower cost.
Our research focuses primarily on the presence of some of the most harmful heavy metals (Cu, Fe, Pb, and Zn) in four types of chlorophyta (Chara, Cladophora, Zygnema, and Spirogyra). Three aquatic habitats were studied in February 2021: lake Dar El Chioukh, Oued Mellah, and Oued Boucedira in the district of Djelfa city, approximately 300 km south of Algiers in the highlands (Algeria).This analysis would then allow us to assess the degree of accumulation of the chosen TMEs in the tissues of the chlorophyta studied and established in two freshwater ecosystems in the Djelfa region, with the goal of finding adequate interventions to slow the deterioration of these environments and minimize the impact of metallic pollution.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

Djelfa is situated in middle northern Algeria, beyond the southern foothills of the Atlas Tellien from the north, with the chief town of Wilaya 300 km south of the capital (Figure 1). It is situated between 2° and 5° east longitude and 33° and 35° north latitude, and has a total area of 32,256.35 km2 (1.36% of the country’s total area). It is now mainly composed of 36 municipalities divided into 12 Dairates [13].

2.2. Hydrology

The hydrographic network in this area is quite dense, extending over all reliefs. The direction of the major rivers varies depending on the terrain, although it is commonly perpendicular to them, running north–south to north-west–south-east (for example, the wadis M’zi, Messad, El Djorf, and so on). It may, however, be in accordance with these reliefs since affluent valleys formed inside depressions are caused by relief inversion, as in the case of the combes of Djebels Lazreg and Tebag in the Southwest of Fernane and the perched syn-clinals of Bou Kahil of Djebel Zerga and Djelfa (Figure 1). Furthermore, the majority of the wadis in this dry to semi-arid environment flow only when it rains [14].

2.3. Climate

The region of Djelfa is characterized by a semi-arid to arid climate with a continental nuance, with an average annual temperature of 14.32 °C. It is characterized by the existence of two seasons: a dry and hot summer season, and a cold winter season (Figure 1).
The three locations were selected for the sampling were:
➢
Site 01: the lake of Dar El Chioukh.
➢
Site 02: Oued Mellah.
➢
Site 03: Oued Boucedira (Figure 1).
The selection of these locations was based on the abundance of algae and their closeness to various wastewater discharges and agricultural and household waste releases.

2.4. Algae Sample Collection and Identification

Samples were collected in February 2021. The hand-driven algae were cleaned of all epiphytes and detritus associated with their tillers, washed in situ with water, and then transferred to plastic bags. After reception at the laboratory, they were sorted by species. Specimen identification and description specimen identification began in the field and continued in the laboratory. The description was essentially based on observation with the naked eye, with a magnifying glass, or with an optical microscope (MOTIC-AE2000AE). Observation with the naked eye made it possible to identify all the most “accessible” morphological characteristics, such as the color (pigment), the nature of the thallus, the shape and amplitude of the ramification of the thallus, and the size and the consistency of the thallus. Observation with a magnifying glass or under a microscope made it possible to see the fine characters, such as the sexual and asexual organs, the rhizines, and the structure of the thallus. In this work, the identification was based on the observation of the morphological characteristics by comparing the data obtained with other works, while being based on the following criteria: the type of ramification, the color, the consistency, the attachment organs, and the aspect of the thallus. Consultation of the WoRMS (World Register Marine Species) and Algea Base databases also facilitated the identification of taxa. All the species collected are described morphologically, photographed to build a photo library, and establish identification keys.
Among these harvested and identified microalgae, four algae were selected on the basis of the dominant species. All of these algae belong to chlorophycophytes (Figure 2). The four chlorophyta are filamentous taxa Chara (Charophyceae), Cladophora (Cladophoraceae), Spirogyra, and Zygnema, which constitute the group Zygnemataceae.
The four selected algae were washed again with tap water, then with distilled water, dried in the open air for 24 h, and finally dried in the oven at 40 °C. for 24 h. These algae were then ground into a fine powder which was later used.

2.5. Mineralization

This stage was accomplished using the aqua regia technique, which is a combination of 3:1 hydrochloric acid and nitric acid that is often employed in mineral and organic chemistry. It permits metal dissolution and the attack of the remaining organic molecules [15]. The steps of mineralization are as follows: 1 g of the sample (powder) is taken and added to 1 mL of Nitric acid (HNO3 65%) and 3 mL of HCl (35–38%); the mixture is then heated under stirring to complete homogenization. This operation is repeated twice. A volume of 50 mL of distilled water is then added to each beaker. The resulting mineralization is filtered through a filter paper and atomic absorption spectrophotometry (UNICAM PYE UNICAM 969) is used to analyze the samples.

2.6. Selection of Contaminants

Although heavy metals may have a natural origin (subsoil rocks, ores), they are mostly caused by the contamination of water by industrial discharges. They have the particularity of accumulating in living organisms and in the trophic chain [16]. These metals may accumulate in living species’ tissues, causing significant harm to the whole food chain [17]. In addition, the accumulation of metals in algal cells can influence the formation of reactive oxygen species. At normal levels, they act as essential molecules to control algal metabolisms such as growth actions, cell death, and defense against pathogenic organisms. When the amount of metals is excessive, it can cause high oxidative potential and contribute to cell damage, which directly interferes with their cellular composition, altering protein and lipid levels and, in many cases, leading to cell death.

2.7. Statistical Data Processing Techniques

The findings were statistically processed using the Excel stat program, version 2007. A Principal Component Analysis (PCA) on reduced centered variables is used in the descriptive statistics technique. The goal of this study is to examine the link between metal concentration and algae observed in surface waters. The use of multivariate exploratory methods (factorial analysis and ascending hierarchical classification) as reported by Belkhiri et al. [18] and Bencer et al. [19] allows for the identification of the most relevant parameters that describe wastewater quality and demonstrate their variability.

3. Results and Discussion

Our research contributes to the study of metal contamination by four heavy metals (Cu, Fe, Pb, Zn) in four chlorophyta (Chara, Cladophora, Spirogyra, and Zygnema), which were collected in the lakes of Dar El Chioukh, Oued Mellah, and Oued Boucedira, three aquatic environments in the city of Djelfa, in February 2021.
The average metal contents are expressed in mg/kg of the four metals (Cu, Zn, Fe, Pb) in algae (Chara, Cladophora, Spirogyra, and Zygnema,), in the three sites (Lake Dar El Chioukh, Oued Mellah, and Oued Boucedira) in Djelfa are reported in Table 1.
The bioaccumulation of the investigated metals seems to be different in the four species of algae tested from one location to another in the city of Djelfa, according to the findings. Metal deposition occurs primarily in algae in proportion to metal availability, organism size, ecology, and morphology, and the time of immersion and exposure of algae [20]. Because of anthropogenic pressures and the establishment of various industrial, economic, and tourist activities, the Oued Mellah, the region’s main watercourse, has undergone and continues to undergo significant degradation as a result of industrial discharges and direct release of domestic waste water. The distribution of metallic elements in the algae investigated reflected these degradations. Indeed, according to the findings of this study, the affinity for certain trace metals differs at the algal level. The accumulation also varies from one location to the other.
According to the various analyses, the amounts of Fe and Pb observed are rather significant in comparison to the other metals analyzed and exceed the requirements (Table 1). Road traffic, raw industrial discharge, and direct release of household wastewater may all explain these amounts [21]. The data demonstrate that Fe is the most abundant element in all of the species tested, with concentrations that exceed the permissible limits (IAEA, 2005). Its presence in all algae species investigated indicates that all three locations have iron contamination. Comparing the metal composition of the four species from the three locations, we found that the highest concentrations of the three metals (Fe, Pb, and Cu) are found in Chara for iron and in Spirogyra for Pb and Cu, with the exception of iron, which exhibits very high levels and surpasses IAEA standards in all four species, most notably in “Chara” at “site 1”. The quantities of metals in various species of algae from the same biotope are observed to vary. In addition, the presence of trace amounts of heavy metals in large concentrations inside living species reveals the contamination of the aquatic environment.
In general, these data demonstrate that metal bioaccumulation varies across species and locations, as is the case with Chara and Cladophora [22]. The trace elements chosen for this study are among the most frequently encountered metal pollutants in soil: Cu, Zn, Fe, and Pb. However, Pb is toxic at high concentrations [23], despite being an element with low mobilization but high toxicity when assimilated by plants [15].
➢
Case of Cu
The greatest value of 82.5 mg/kg was obtained at “site 1” of “Cladophora”, above the IAEA-accepted limit of 23.2 mg/kg, while the lowest value was 13 mg/kg at “site 2” of “Spirogyra”. For Chara: 28.5 mg/kg (site1) > 27 mg/kg (site3) > 26 mg/kg (site1); the levels exceed the standard (23.2 mg/kg). For Zygnema: 38.5 mg/kg (site2 )> 30.5 mg/kg (site1) > 19.5 (site3); the levels exceed the standard for site 1 and 2. For Cladophora: 82.5 mg/kg (site1) > 19 mg/kg (site3) > 14.5 mg/kg (site2); the levels in site 1 exceed the standard (23.2 mg/kg), For Spirogyra: 52.5 mg/kg (site3) > 32.5 mg/kg (site1) > 13 mg/kg (site2); the levels exceed the standard for site 1 and 3 (Figure 3).
Cu data for site 1 indicated very high levels compared to the maximum dose authorized by the IAEA for all species investigated (Lake Dar El Chioukh), high values that exceed the limit in Chara and Zygnema for site 2 (Oued Mellah), and values significantly above the standard in Chara and Spirogyra for site 3 (Oued Boucedira). Some explanations have been proposed to explain these findings. First, since Cu is a necessary nutrient for organisms, it is naturally present in living organisms, and we have identified it in the species analyzed. Furthermore, it may be hazardous only at a certain concentration level [24,25].
➢
Case of Zn
The greatest value is 47.5 mg/kg in “Spirogyra” at “site 3” (Figure 3), and the minimum value is 17.5 mg/kg in “Zygnema” at “site 2” (Figure 3); these reported values do not exceed the IAEA standard (128 mg/kg). For Chara:40 mg/kg (site1) > 39 mg/kg (site3) > 38.5 mg/kg (site2); levels do not exceed the standard (128 mg/kg) for the three sites. For Zygnema:39 mg/kg (site1) > 21 mg/kg (site3) > 17.5 mg/kg (site2); levels do not exceed the standard (128 mg/kg) for all three sites. For Cladophora: 44.5 mg/kg (site1) > 35.5 mg/kg (site3) > 130 mg/kg (site2); levels do not exceed the standard (128 mg/kg) for all three sites. For Spirogyra: 47.5 mg/kg (site3) > 39 mg/kg (site1) > 36 mg/kg (site2); levels do not exceed the standard (128 mg/kg) for all three sites (Figure 4).
These findings indicate that Zn is not a concern to the three locations. Different authors and species have already shown the same outcome. Zn accumulates faster than other heavy metals, such as Cu and Pb. These results are in agreement with those reported earlier [26,27]. Note that the algae “Spirogyra” accumulated more Zn than the algae Chara, Zygnema and Cladophora.
➢
Case of Fe
We record a maximum value of 5600 mg/kg in “Chara” at “site 1” (Figure 5) and the lowest value of 918 mg/kg in “Chara” at “site 2”; these reported values far exceed the IAEA standard (497 mg/kg).
Our findings show that iron accumulates more than other heavy metals, including Zn, Cu, and Pb. It is worth noting that the algae “Chara” accumulated more Zn than the algae Zygnema, Cladophora, or Spirogyra. For Chara: 5600 mg/kg (site1) > 1500 mg/kg (site3) > 918 mg/kg (site2); levels exceed the norm (497 mg/kg) for the three sites. For Zygnema: 1490 mg/kg (site2) > 1485 mg/kg (site1) > 1335 mg/kg (site1); levels exceed the standard (497 mg/kg) for all three sites. For Cladophora: 3030 mg/kg (site2) > 2051 mg/kg (site1) > 1565 mg/kg (site3); levels exceed the standard (497 mg/kg) for all three sites. For Spirogyra: 2295 mg/kg (site3) > 1475 mg/kg (site2) > 772.5 mg/kg (site1); levels exceed the norm (497 mg/kg) for all three sites (Figure 5).
This metal is associated with the usage of fertilizers, which may explain its prevalence in algal tissues. We also observed that Fe is more easily assimilated by these algae than other metals (Cu, Zn, and Pb). We observed that all three locations are very iron-polluted as a result of fertilizers, raw industrial waste, and direct discharge of domestic wastewater.
➢
Case of Pb
Figure 6 depicts the lead levels found in (Table 1) from samples collected at the three locations.
The greatest value is 50.85 mg/kg in “Cladophora” at “site 1”, and the lowest value is 3.15 mg/kg in “Cladophora” at “site 3”; these reported values substantially exceed the IAEA limit (0.574 mg/kg).
Our findings show that Pb accumulates significantly in the four algae investigated. It is worth mentioning that the algae “Cladophora” has accumulated more Pb than the algae Chara, Zygnéma, or Spirogyra. For Chara: 48.1 mg/kg (site1) > 45.25 mg/kg (site2) > 45.1 mg/kg (site3); the levels exceed the standard (0.574 mg/kg) for the three sites. For Zygnema: 34.75 mg/kg (site2) > 30.9 mg/kg (site1) > 16.4 mg/kg (site3); the levels exceed the standard (0.574 mg/kg) for the three sites. For Cladophora: 50.85 mg/kg (site1) > 40.55 mg/kg (site2) > 3.15 mg/kg (site3); the levels exceed the standard (0.574 mg/kg) for the three sites. For Spirogyra: 50.35 mg/kg (site3) > 4.95 mg/kg (site2) > 4.65 mg/kg (site1); the levels exceed the standard (0.574 mg/kg) for the three sites (Figure 6).
This metal may be found in algal tissues. We also observed that Cladophora accumulates more Pb than other algae. We noticed that the three sites are significantly contaminated by Pb, which is caused by vehicle traffic and the release of fine metallic particles into the atmosphere, mostly in metropolitan areas, which are deposited on the ground and may reach the networks [26]. Indeed, metals generated by human sources are present in very reactive chemical forms, posing much greater dangers than metals derived from natural sources, which are often immobilized in relatively harmless forms [28]. The World Health Organization also emphasizes the substantial danger posed by inorganic Pb introduced into humans via drinking water [29]. Pb poisoning has multiple pathological consequences, which may be divided into two categories: physiological and neurological impacts [30]. The former causes a rise in blood pressure, vascular and intestinal damage, and renal problems (Pb nephropathy). Pb may replace Ca in children’s bones, which is readily detected using X-rays [31]. Finally, incidences of sterility have been reported after continuous Pb exposure [32].

3.1. PCA Analysis

Due to the fact that the first two eigenvalues account for 75.72 percent of the inertia, we will restrict ourselves to these two axes and summarize the data by the first two main components (Table 2).
The degressive nature of the successive eigenvalues indicates a significant degree of data variability. Using the cosine square of the angle formed by the points with the projection plane to evaluate the quality of the points’ depictions prevents misinterpretation. In addition, the relative contributions of the points to the development of the axes make it feasible to identify the points that contribute the most to the axes’ meanings (Table 3).
This structure makes it easy to detect approximately X groups of individuals on the factorial plane generated by the first two principal components (Figure 7):
-
Group 1: Spirogyra 1, Spirogyra 2, and Cladophora 3 with Fe
-
Group 2: Zygnema 2, Zygnema 3 with Pb.
-
Group 3: Zygnema 1, Chara 2, Chara 3, and Cladophora 2 with Zn.
-
Group 4: Cladophora 1, Spirogyra 3, and Chara 1 with Cu.
The samples (those in the black circle with Cladophora 2, typically) positioned around the origin of the axis demonstrate random values for the factors under consideration (Figure 8).
The findings of the PCA are overlaid with those of the AHC (see the dashed groups on the factorial plan of the PCA and the dendrogram of the AHC shown in Figure 9).

3.2. Principal Component Analysis (PCA)

In Table 2 and Table 3, the findings of the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) are shown. This analysis enabled the identification of four primary components. The total of the variances is % (Table 3), which is still more than 70 %. These factors account for the variance expressed and explain the information sought. The representation using these factors gives a satisfactory account of the structure of the scatterplots. The affinity that exists between all the variables taken is given by the correlation matrix (Table 2). Table 3 shows significant correlations between algae and trace metals. The results of the PCA are used to select the different factors needed to interpret the different data. The analysis of the graphs of the space of variables, in the factorial plane F1–F2 (Figure 9), shows that this plane alone represents 75.72% of the information sought, that is, of the variance expressed. The community circle (Figure 8) shows that the most important factor F1 is determined by heavy metals. This grouping is dominated by heavy metals that come from urban and industrial pollution. Factor 1 highlights metal pollution of anthropogenic origin related to industrial, agricultural, and domestic activities [33,34,35].
The F2 factor is determined by the different species of algae, which shows the important role of these bioindicators to accumulate these heavy metals. The presence of trace metals (Pb, Fe, Cu, and Zn) with levels exceeding the recommended standards reveals metal pollution of anthropogenic origin.

4. Conclusions

The current study showed that the levels of heavy metals in algae studied in the three chosen sites were higher than the acceptable limit. The accumulations of heavy metals were very high, which reflects the pollution of those sites due to the increased discharge of waste materials and pollutant.
-
The high bioaccumulation abilities of Cladophora, Spirogyra, Chara, and Zygnema algae for selected metals have been confirmed.
-
The results indicate that some species may serve as better biomonitors than others for certain elements. Based on the agreement with the available literature, we suggest Cladophora for Fe and Zn, Chara for Pb, and Spirogyra for Cu.
-
Interestingly, algae could serve as a good bio-indicator for pollution. The dispersal of heavy metals and their increased levels indicate the need for the government to monitor water of those sites more effectively and create public awareness of heavy metal accumulation in food.
The purpose of this study is to assess the level of heavy metal pollution in certain algae from the city of Djelfa. The research conducted on the wastewater of the three locations within the city of Djelfa have enabled the identification of the key findings:
-
In the three sites of the city of Djelfa, the levels of Fe and Pb in the four species of algae exceed the IAEA standard (497 mg/kg and 0.574 mg/kg, respectively). The levels of Cu also exceed the standard (23, 2 mg/kg) in the four species for site 1, in Chara and Zygnema for site 2, and in Chara and Spirogyra for site 3, whereas the levels of Zn remain low and are significantly lower than the standard.
-
Our findings on the amounts of Cu and Zn show the significance of these two metals to the biological processes. We have prioritized the accumulation rates of the four examined metals throughout this investigation. For the three sites, the metal accumulation gradient is as follows: Fe > Cu > Pb > Zn.
Therefore, algae can be a very good aquatic bio-filter plant for the bio-assessment of polluted urban stream ecosystems and polluted waters.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.T.; Methodology, M.D., F.D. and M.Z.; Software, H.T.; Validation, A.H.; Formal analysis, M.I.K. and H.T.; Resources, M.Z.; Writing—original draft, M.D.; F.D.; Writing—review & editing, M.I.K., L.M., A.A., A.A.A. and A.H.; Supervision, L.M., A.A. and A.A.A.; Project administration, L.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank all who assisted in conducting this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Afroz, R.; Rahman, A. Health Impact of River Water Pollution in Malaysia. Int. J. Adv. Appl. Sci. 2017, 4, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jaishankar, M.; Tseten, T.; Anbalagan, N.; Mathew, B.; Beeregowda, K. Toxicity, Mechanism and Health Effects of Some Heavy Metals. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 2014, 7, 60–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Pan, L.; Fang, G.; Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Su, B.; Li, D.; Xiang, B. Potentially Toxic Element Pollution Levels and Risk Assessment of Soils and Sediments in the Upstream River, Miyun Reservoir, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2018, 15, 2364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Odobašić, A.; Šestan, I.; Begić, S. Biosensors for Determination of Heavy Metals in Waters. In Biosensors for Environmental Monitoring; BoD—Books on Demand: Paris, France, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kacholi, D.S.; Sahu, M. Levels and Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Soil, Water, and Vegetables of Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. J. Chem. 2018, 2018, 1402674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Krishnamurti, G.; Subashchandrabose, S.; Mallavarapu, M.; Naidu, R. Assessment of Bioavailability of Heavy Metal Pollutants Using Soil Isolates of Chlorella Sp. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2013, 22, 8826–8832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Maltsev, Y.; Maltseva, A.; Maltseva, S. Differential Zn and Mn Sensitivity of Microalgae Species from Genera Bracteacoccus and Lobosphaera. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Shekhovtseva, O.; Maltseva, I. Physical, Chemical, and Biological Properties of Soils in the City of Mariupol, Ukraine. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2015, 48, 1393–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zamani-Ahmadmahmoodi, R.; Malekabadi, M.; Rahimi, R.; Johari, S.A. Aquatic Pollution Caused by Mercury, Lead, and Cadmium Affects Cell Growth and Pigment Content of Marine Microalga, Nannochloropsis Oculata. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2020, 192, 330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Marinova, G.; Ivanova, J.; Pilarski, P.; Chernev, G.; Chaneva, G. Effect of Heavy Metals on the Green Alga Scenedesmus Incrassatulus. Oxid. Commun. 2018, 41, 318–328. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sultana, N.; Hossain, S.M.; Mohammed, M.; Irfan, M.; Bashirul, H.; Faruque, M.O.; Abdur Razzak, S.; Hossain, M. Experimental Study and Parameters Optimization of Microalgae Based Heavy Metals Removal Process Using a Hybrid Response Surface Methodology-Crow Search Algorithm. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 15068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. François, R. Introduction à L’écotoxicologie: Fondements et Applications; Lavoisier: Cachan, France, 2007; ISBN 2-7430-1979-4. [Google Scholar]
  13. Nedjimi, B.; Beladel, B.; Guit, B. Biodiversity of Halophytic Vegetation in Chott Zehrez Lake of Djelfa (Algeria). Am. J. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 1527–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Koussa, M.; Bouziane, M. Apport Du SIG a La Cartographie Des Zones à Risque d’érosion Hydrique Dans La Région de Djelfa, Algérie. Leban. Sci. J. 2018, 19, 31–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mouni, L.; Belkhiri, L.; Bouzaza, A.; Bollinger, J.-C. Chemical Associations and Sorption Capacity of Pb and Zn: Column Experiments on a Polluted Soil from the Amizour Mining District (Algeria). Environ. Earth Sci. 2016, 75, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pandey, G.; Sharma, M. Heavy Metals Causing Toxicity in Animals and Fishes. Res. J. Anim. Vet. Fish. Sci. 2014, 2, 17–23. [Google Scholar]
  17. Derakhshan, Z.; Faramarzian, M.; Mahvi, A.; Hosseini, M.S.; Miri, M. Assessment of Heavy Metals Residue in Edible Vegetables Distributed in Shiraz, Iran. J. Food Qual. Hazards Control 2016, 3, 25–29. [Google Scholar]
  18. Belkhiri, L.; Mouni, L. Geochemical Characterization of Surface Water and Groundwater in Soummam Basin, Algeria. Nat. Resour. Res. 2014, 23, 393–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Said, B.; Abderrahmane, B.; Mouni, L. Multivariate Statistical Analysis of the Groundwater of Ain Djacer Area (Eastern of Algeria). Arab. J. Geosci. 2016, 9, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Priyadarshini, E.; Priyadarshini, S.; Pradhan, N. Heavy Metal Resistance in Algae and Its Application for Metal Nanoparticle Synthesis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nouacer, I.; Benalia, M.; Henini, G.; Mebrouk, D.; Laidani, Y. Mathematical Modeling and Interpretation of Equilibrium Isotherms of Pb (II) from Aqueous Media by Chlorella Pyrenoidosa Immobilized in Luffa Cylindrica. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2021, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lotmani, B.; Mesnoua, M. Effects of Copper Stress on Antioxidative Enzymes, Chlorophyll and Protein Content in Atriplex Halimus. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10, 10143–10148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Balali-Mood, M.; Naseri, K.; Tahergorabi, Z.; Khazdair, M.; Sadeghi, M. Toxic Mechanisms of Five Heavy Metals: Mercury, Lead, Chromium, Cadmium, and Arsenic. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 643972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Cavalletti, E.; Romano, G.; Palma Esposito, F.; Barra, L.; Chiaiese, P.; Balzano, S.; Sardo, A. Copper Effect on Microalgae: Toxicity and Bioremediation Strategies. Toxics 2022, 10, 527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Laboratoire Environnement Ressources de Concarne. Qualité Du Milieu Marin Littoral. Bultin de la Surveillance, Edition 2008; Département du Finistè: Concarneau, France, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ater, M.; Ali, N.; Kasmi, H. Tolérance et Accumulation Du Cuivre et Du Chrome Chez Deux Espèces de Lentilles d’eau: Lemna Minor L. et Lemna Gibba L. Rev. des Sci. de l’eau 2006, 19, 57–67. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ah-Peng, C. Mise Au Point d’un Outil Diagnostic Basé Sur l’Utilisation de La Mousse Aquatique Fontinalis Antipyretica Hedw. En culture pour l’estimation de la qualité des cours d’eau. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Lille II, Lille, France, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kaimoussi, A.; Mouzdahir, A.; Saih, A. Variations Saisonnières Des Teneurs En Métaux (Cd, Cu, Fe, Mn et Zn) Chez l’algue Ulva Lactuca Prélevée Au Niveau Du Littoral de La Ville d’El Jadida (Maroc). Comptes Rendus Biol. 2004, 327, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chafaa, M. Bio-Surveillance Des Métaux Lourds (Pb, Zn, Cu) à La Sortie de La Station d’épuration de Tiaret (Algérie) Au Moyen Des Végétaux Aquatiques: Plante Lemna Minor, Algue Spyrogyre Link Sp et Bryophyte Fontinalis Antipyretica. Ph.D. Thesis, Université Djilali Liabes, Sidi Bel Abbès, Algeria, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  30. Koehl, L.; Harp, J.; Han, D. Pb Neurotoxicity: Neuropsychological Effects of Lead Toxicity. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 840547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Kumar, V.; Abbas, A.K. Robbins y Cotran. Patología Estructural y Funcional; Elsevier Health Sciences: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; ISBN 84-13-82111-8. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kumar, S.; Sharma, A.; Kshetrimayum, C. Environmental & Occupational Exposure & Female Reproductive Dysfunction. Indian J. Med. Res. 2019, 150, 532. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zeghioud, H.; Assadi, A.A.; Khellaf, N.; Djelal, H.; Amrane, A.; Rtimi, S. Reactive species monitoring and their contribution for removal of textile effluent with photocatalysis under UV and visible lights: Dynamics and mechanism. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2018, 365, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ahmed Amine Azzaz, Salah Jellali, Hanene Akrout, Aymen Amine Assadi, Latifa Bousselmi, Dynamic investigations on cationic dye desorption from chemically modified lignocellulosic material using a low-cost eluent: Dye recovery and anodic oxidation efficiencies of the desorbed solutions. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 201, 28–38.
  35. Zhuang, S.; Lu, X.; Yu, B.; Fan, X.; Yang, Y. Ascertaining the Pollution, Ecological Risk and Source of Metal(Loid)s in the Upstream Sediment of Danjiang River, China. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 125, 107502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Water 15 00974 g001 550
Figure 1. The research region and chosen sites including Oued Boucedira, Dar El Chioukh, and Oued Mellah.
Figure 1. The research region and chosen sites including Oued Boucedira, Dar El Chioukh, and Oued Mellah.
Water 15 00974 g001
Water 15 00974 g002a 550Water 15 00974 g002b 550
Figure 2. Chlorophyta: (a) Chara, (b) Zygnema, (c) Cladophora, (d) Spirogyra.
Figure 2. Chlorophyta: (a) Chara, (b) Zygnema, (c) Cladophora, (d) Spirogyra.
Water 15 00974 g002aWater 15 00974 g002b
Water 15 00974 g003 550
Figure 3. Cu contents of the four algae studied (for the three sites considered).
Figure 3. Cu contents of the four algae studied (for the three sites considered).
Water 15 00974 g003
Water 15 00974 g004 550
Figure 4. Zn contents of the four algae studied (for the three sites considered).
Figure 4. Zn contents of the four algae studied (for the three sites considered).
Water 15 00974 g004
Water 15 00974 g005 550
Figure 5. Fe contents of the four algae studied (for the three sites considered).
Figure 5. Fe contents of the four algae studied (for the three sites considered).
Water 15 00974 g005
Water 15 00974 g006 550
Figure 6. Pb contents of the four algae studied (for the three sites considered).
Figure 6. Pb contents of the four algae studied (for the three sites considered).
Water 15 00974 g006
Water 15 00974 g007 550
Figure 7. F1xF2 factorial design of variables.
Figure 7. F1xF2 factorial design of variables.
Water 15 00974 g007
Water 15 00974 g008 550
Figure 8. F1xF2 factorial design of individuals (samples).
Figure 8. F1xF2 factorial design of individuals (samples).
Water 15 00974 g008
Water 15 00974 g009 550
Figure 9. Structure dendrogram of individuals (samples) according to the CAH.
Figure 9. Structure dendrogram of individuals (samples) according to the CAH.
Water 15 00974 g009
Table
Table 1. Comparison of the values obtained with the limit values (International standards accepted by (IAEA, 2005)).
Table 1. Comparison of the values obtained with the limit values (International standards accepted by (IAEA, 2005)).
Cu (mg/kg)Zn (mg/kg)Fe (mg/kg)Pb (mg/kg)
Values obtained in site 1Chara26 (±0.6)40 (±0.8)5600 (±3.7)48.1
Zygnema30.5 (±0.3)39 (±0.5)1485 (±2.8)30.9
Cladophora82.5 (±0.4)44.5 (±0.9)2051 (±4.4)50.85
Spirogyra32.5 (±0.8)39 (±0.4)772.5 (±3.2)4.65
Values obtained in site 2Chara28.5 (±0.4)38.5 (±0.8)918 (±2.7)45.25
Zygnema38.5 (±0.1)17.5 (±0.3)1490 (±3.9)34.75
Cladophora14.5 (±0.8)30 (±0.7)3030 (±3.4)40.55
Spirogyra13 (±0.7)36 (±0.7)1475 (±4.2)4.95
Norm Values obtained in site 3Chara27 (±0.2)39 (±0.9)1500 (±2.6)45.1
Zygnema19.5 (±0.3)21 (±0.5)1335 (±3.4)16,4
Cladophora19 (±0.7)35.5 (±0.4)1565 (±5.3)3.15
Spirogyra52.5 (±0.6)47.5 (±0.3)2295 (±2.9)50.35
NOR Standards (AIEA, 2005)Algae23.2 (±0.2)128 (±1.4)497 (±1.7)0.574
Table
Table 2. Eigenvalue matrix.
Table 2. Eigenvalue matrix.
F1F2F3F4
Own Value1.971.060.680.29
Variability (%)49.2626.4617.027.26
% Cumulative49.2675.7292.74100.00
Table
Table 3. Explanatory points for axis one.
Table 3. Explanatory points for axis one.
SamplesCoordinatesSquare CosinesContributions
Chara11.6950.29112.147
Chara20.2280.0360.219
Chara30.3780.1490.603
Zygnema10.0020.0000.000
Zygnema2−0.8770.1563.250
Zygnema3−1.8700.79714.782
Cladophora12.6230.70429.105
Cladophora2−0.2030.0170.174
Cladophora3−1.4230.6738.566
Spirogyra1−1.0180.3204.382
Spirogyra2−1.5320.7059.921
Spirogyra31.9960.90516.852
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dehbi, M.; Dehbi, F.; Kanjal, M.I.; Tahraoui, H.; Zamouche, M.; Amrane, A.; Assadi, A.A.; Hadadi, A.; Mouni, L. Analysis of Heavy Metal Contamination in Macroalgae from Surface Waters in Djelfa, Algeria. Water 2023, 15, 974. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15050974

AMA Style

Dehbi M, Dehbi F, Kanjal MI, Tahraoui H, Zamouche M, Amrane A, Assadi AA, Hadadi A, Mouni L. Analysis of Heavy Metal Contamination in Macroalgae from Surface Waters in Djelfa, Algeria. Water. 2023; 15(5):974. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15050974

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dehbi, Meriem, Faouzia Dehbi, Muhammad Imran Kanjal, Hichem Tahraoui, Meriem Zamouche, Abdeltif Amrane, Aymen Amine Assadi, Amina Hadadi, and Lotfi Mouni. 2023. "Analysis of Heavy Metal Contamination in Macroalgae from Surface Waters in Djelfa, Algeria" Water 15, no. 5: 974. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15050974

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop